uk – recent counter pollution r&d activities

38
[email protected] UK – Recent counter UK – Recent counter pollution R&D activities pollution R&D activities

Upload: uriah-orr

Post on 30-Dec-2015

35 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

UK – Recent counter pollution R&D activities. CPR Research Projects. Currently - 9 research projects running All collaborative – unusual in MCA Approx £670,000 worth of funding Feed into or back up NCP philosophy Support operational requirements. Objectives. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

[email protected]

UK – Recent counter pollution UK – Recent counter pollution R&D activitiesR&D activities

[email protected]

CPR Research ProjectsCPR Research Projects

Currently - 9 research projects Currently - 9 research projects runningrunning

All collaborative – unusual in MCAAll collaborative – unusual in MCA Approx £670,000 worth of fundingApprox £670,000 worth of funding Feed into or back up NCP Feed into or back up NCP

philosophyphilosophy Support operational requirementsSupport operational requirements

[email protected]

ObjectivesObjectives

Move “far from market” project Move “far from market” project areasareas

Target stakeholder beneficiariesTarget stakeholder beneficiaries Fair stakeholder funding Fair stakeholder funding Reduce financial burden on MCAReduce financial burden on MCA

[email protected]

Limiting viscosity project Limiting viscosity project

Controversial issueControversial issue Innovative approachInnovative approach 4 stakeholders4 stakeholders

Responder, regulator, industry, MMSResponder, regulator, industry, MMS

Contributions in kindContributions in kind Limited funding availableLimited funding available

[email protected]

Sea trials - 2003Sea trials - 2003

[email protected]

OutcomesOutcomes

sea temperature of 15ºCsea temperature of 15ºC oil viscosities of 2,000 cP (IFO-180)oil viscosities of 2,000 cP (IFO-180) 7,000 cP (IFO-380) 7,000 cP (IFO-380) waves associated with wind speeds waves associated with wind speeds

of between 7 and 14 knotsof between 7 and 14 knots

[email protected]

Ecological effects of Ecological effects of dispersant usedispersant use

Primary UK response methodPrimary UK response method Controversial, often disputedControversial, often disputed Operator/regulators/industry fundingOperator/regulators/industry funding Will feed into Defra reviewWill feed into Defra review Competent contractorCompetent contractor Benefits – All stakeholders involved Benefits – All stakeholders involved

and agreedand agreed

[email protected]

Consequences of not Consequences of not doingdoing

MCA open to MCA open to challenge on challenge on dispersant dispersant philosophy philosophy (happens anyway)(happens anyway)

Limited data to Limited data to demonstrate demonstrate benefitsbenefits

[email protected]

Resource mapping projectResource mapping project

Update 1990 paper based maps Update 1990 paper based maps and produce new digitised mapsand produce new digitised maps

10 stakeholders – public/private10 stakeholders – public/private Challenging project managementChallenging project management Essential stakeholder involvementEssential stakeholder involvement Question of contractor Question of contractor

competencecompetence

[email protected]

Project Funding PartnersProject Funding Partners

[email protected]

OutcomesOutcomes

Highlighted the need for Highlighted the need for government wide standards of data government wide standards of data collection, storage, etccollection, storage, etc

MAGIC website is maintained / MAGIC website is maintained / regularly updated by Defraregularly updated by Defra

We can add new data – places of We can add new data – places of refuge?refuge?

www.magic.gov.ukwww.magic.gov.uk

[email protected]

ECE monitoringECE monitoring Anglo / French joint opsAnglo / French joint ops Qu of phosphate impact on Qu of phosphate impact on

ecosystemecosystem Deliberate release or recover – cost?!Deliberate release or recover – cost?! Defra / MCA – collaboration / fundingDefra / MCA – collaboration / funding PML / Soton Uni – 2 discrete projectsPML / Soton Uni – 2 discrete projects Outcome – no real impact – OK to Outcome – no real impact – OK to

releaserelease

Wreck siteWreck site

[email protected]

Project outputsProject outputs

Project evaluationProject evaluation Marine Information NoteMarine Information Note Project Report – on MCA siteProject Report – on MCA site Greater benefits through Greater benefits through

collaboration with OGD’s and collaboration with OGD’s and IndustryIndustry

[email protected]

New projectsNew projects

Waste management Waste management (potential showstopper)(potential showstopper)

– Not mainstream MCA work areaNot mainstream MCA work area– But successfully pulling stakeholders But successfully pulling stakeholders

togethertogether– Overall benefits to UK plcOverall benefits to UK plc

Potentially polluting shipwrecksPotentially polluting shipwrecks Surface cleaner efficacySurface cleaner efficacy

[email protected]

New projects 06/07New projects 06/07

Design of large scale waste Design of large scale waste treatment planttreatment plant

Techniques for dealing with Techniques for dealing with submerged and sunken oilsubmerged and sunken oil

HNS Risk assessmentHNS Risk assessment

[email protected]

Potentially polluting wrecksPotentially polluting wrecks To identify locations and identity all To identify locations and identity all

potentially polluting wrecks in UK waters.potentially polluting wrecks in UK waters. Establish methodology to best calculate Establish methodology to best calculate

quantities and types of pollutants are quantities and types of pollutants are present on each wreck type.present on each wreck type.

Agree best format for database structure – Agree best format for database structure – including how best to categorise including how best to categorise information.information.

To provide a clear, well structured and To provide a clear, well structured and searchable, dynamic GIS based database searchable, dynamic GIS based database creating a knowledge platform which will creating a knowledge platform which will readily facilitate risk assessment exercises readily facilitate risk assessment exercises for all UK waters and coastline.for all UK waters and coastline.

[email protected]

Evaluation of surface Evaluation of surface cleanerscleaners

To develop robust protocol in electronic format for To develop robust protocol in electronic format for cleaning hard rock surface and man made cleaning hard rock surface and man made structure using a range of cleaning techniquesstructure using a range of cleaning techniques

Development of a decision making tool to aid the Development of a decision making tool to aid the identification of appropriate, fit for purpose identification of appropriate, fit for purpose techniques for a range of oil and emulsion types techniques for a range of oil and emulsion types over a range of hard substrates. To produce a over a range of hard substrates. To produce a guidance manual for shoreline clean-up operatives guidance manual for shoreline clean-up operatives describing best practice for cleaning hard coast describing best practice for cleaning hard coast structures.structures.

To develop a robust guide for developing To develop a robust guide for developing environmental impact assessments for each environmental impact assessments for each cleaning technique, to include primary cleaning technique, to include primary methodology for mitigating environmental damage. methodology for mitigating environmental damage.

[email protected]

Design of large scale waste Design of large scale waste treatment planttreatment plant

To design a treatment plant capable of dealing To design a treatment plant capable of dealing with thousands of tonnes oily waste.with thousands of tonnes oily waste.

To determine best technology and specific To determine best technology and specific machinery for each element of the operation machinery for each element of the operation taking into account a range of waste types.taking into account a range of waste types.

Critically appraise relative costings for each Critically appraise relative costings for each available processavailable process

Identify sourcing of appropriate equipmentIdentify sourcing of appropriate equipment To establish relationships between process To establish relationships between process

treatment technology and nature of material to treatment technology and nature of material to be processed. Water content, sand and gravel, be processed. Water content, sand and gravel, fines, large foreign debrisfines, large foreign debris

To establish criteria for siting of waste process To establish criteria for siting of waste process plant - logistics, to the satifaction of all UK plant - logistics, to the satifaction of all UK environmental regulators.environmental regulators.

To determine plant footprint requirements.To determine plant footprint requirements.

[email protected]

Techniques for dealing with Techniques for dealing with submerged and sunken oilsubmerged and sunken oil

To identify parameters and their To identify parameters and their significance essential to develop realistic significance essential to develop realistic modelling of partially submerged and modelling of partially submerged and sunken VHFO’s in seawater.sunken VHFO’s in seawater.

Develop a methodology to incorporate Develop a methodology to incorporate such algorithms into existing modelling such algorithms into existing modelling capability.capability.

To determine appropriate and realistic oil To determine appropriate and realistic oil recovery techniques for submerged and recovery techniques for submerged and sunken oils.sunken oils.

[email protected]

HNS Risk assessmentHNS Risk assessment

To identify the highest risk HNS for the To identify the highest risk HNS for the UK PCZ and determine priorities for UK PCZ and determine priorities for modelling and practical work. modelling and practical work.

To determine the fate and effects of To determine the fate and effects of higher risk HNS in the marine higher risk HNS in the marine environment.environment.

Produce a guidance document, easily Produce a guidance document, easily searchable for prediction of fate and searchable for prediction of fate and effects of generic higher risk HNS.effects of generic higher risk HNS.

MIMAC – BRUGGES

OCTOBER 2006

[email protected]

Very Heavy Fuel OilsVery Heavy Fuel OilsRisk analysis of their transport in UK Risk analysis of their transport in UK

waterswaters

Kevin Colcomb, UK Maritime and Kevin Colcomb, UK Maritime and Coastguard AgencyCoastguard Agency

[email protected]

What are VHFOs?What are VHFOs? Not an industry standard definitionNot an industry standard definition Purposely used term to distinguish Purposely used term to distinguish

heavier fuel oils from lighter fuelsheavier fuel oils from lighter fuels Defined as FOs of 380cSt or higher at Defined as FOs of 380cSt or higher at

50°C50°C Transported VHFO includes:Transported VHFO includes:

– Cargoes of Residual Fuel OilCargoes of Residual Fuel Oil– Bunkers of IFO380, IFO500, IFO700Bunkers of IFO380, IFO500, IFO700

[email protected]

Production of VHFOsProduction of VHFOs VHFO cargoes are RFO from refineriesVHFO cargoes are RFO from refineries Almost all RFO can be categorised as Almost all RFO can be categorised as

VHFOVHFO Examples are Examples are ErikaErika (555cSt at 50°C) (555cSt at 50°C)

and and PrestigePrestige (615cSt at 50°C) (615cSt at 50°C) VHFO bunkers produced by blending VHFO bunkers produced by blending

RFO with lighter oil productsRFO with lighter oil products VHFO bunkers used by ships with VHFO bunkers used by ships with

slower enginesslower engines

[email protected]

Properties of VHFO in Properties of VHFO in seawaterseawater

Initial viscosity increases to 20,000 – Initial viscosity increases to 20,000 – 50,000 cSt or almost solid50,000 cSt or almost solid

Remain in thick layer, fragmenting Remain in thick layer, fragmenting after a few daysafter a few days

May sink, drop below waves or float May sink, drop below waves or float below surfacebelow surface

Do not respond to dispersantsDo not respond to dispersants Can be difficult to recover even by Can be difficult to recover even by

mechanical meansmechanical means

[email protected]

VHFO Traffic in the UKPCZVHFO Traffic in the UKPCZ No direct No direct

information from information from commercial sourcescommercial sources

Statistical data Statistical data sources:sources:– EUROSTATEUROSTAT– IEAIEA– UK GovernmentUK Government– Etc.Etc.

[email protected]

UK production and consumption of RFO (DTI, UK production and consumption of RFO (DTI, 2003)2003)

-2,022

-867

-6,385

394

-1,540

11,517

-10,000-5,00005,00010,00015,000

Thousand tonnes of RFO

PRODUCTION

IMPORTS

EXPORTS

INTERNATIONAL MARINEBUNKERS

REFINEY USE

OTHER USES

[email protected]

NW Europe Production and Consumption (EUROSTAT, NW Europe Production and Consumption (EUROSTAT, 2002)2002)

-15000

-10000

-5000

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

BE DK FR DE IR NL NO UK

Th

ou

san

d t

on

nes

Production Imports

Exports International Marine Bunkers

Domestic Supply

[email protected]

RFO imports to Netherlands RFO imports to Netherlands ’93-’05’93-’05

(IEA, 2003 and EUROSTAT, 2005)(IEA, 2003 and EUROSTAT, 2005)

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

14,000

16,000

18,000

1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006

Year

Th

ou

sa

nd

To

nn

es

[email protected]

Seaborne Russian Fuel oil Exports

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

40,000

45,000

50,000

1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004

Year

tho

usa

nd

to

nn

es

Black Sea

Baltic Sea

RFO exports from Russia RFO exports from Russia (Poten and Partners, 2005)(Poten and Partners, 2005)

[email protected]

Major transfers of VHFO cargoes through Major transfers of VHFO cargoes through UKPCZUKPCZ

From Quantity (thousands of

tonnes)

To

Russian Federation 16,811 Non W. European Destinations Russian Federation 3,916 Netherlands Estonia 2,167 Netherlands Germany 1,621 United States United Kingdom 1,540 United Kingdom Russian Federation 1,283 France France 1,258 United Kingdom United Kingdom 1,169 Italy United Kingdom 949 Spain Belgium 875 United States United Kingdom 812 United States Italy 762 United Kingdom Russian Federation 638 Spain Netherlands 634 United States Sweden 628 United Kingdom Netherlands 536 United Kingdom

[email protected]

BunkersBunkers Very difficult to determine accurate information for Very difficult to determine accurate information for

IFO380+ bunkers:IFO380+ bunkers:– Cannot determine from statisticsCannot determine from statistics– Blending to grade may occur at point of saleBlending to grade may occur at point of sale– Estimation techniques inaccurate (e.g. vessels > 20,000 Estimation techniques inaccurate (e.g. vessels > 20,000

DWT tonnes)DWT tonnes) In 2002, 27 million tonnes of RFO sold for In 2002, 27 million tonnes of RFO sold for

‘international marine bunkers’ in NW Europe and ‘international marine bunkers’ in NW Europe and Baltic (EUROSTAT, 2003) but does not includeBaltic (EUROSTAT, 2003) but does not include– RussiaRussia– Domestic trafficDomestic traffic– Vessels not bunkering in NW EuropeVessels not bunkering in NW Europe

‘‘International marine bunkers’ data is also a International marine bunkers’ data is also a confusing term and may be misreported in confusing term and may be misreported in statistics statistics

[email protected]

Is it possible to estimate Is it possible to estimate bunkers?bunkers?

2004 Dover Strait vessel traffic data supplied, including:2004 Dover Strait vessel traffic data supplied, including:– Vessel classVessel class– Vessel deadweight tonnageVessel deadweight tonnage

Typical bunker tank size data obtained for each classTypical bunker tank size data obtained for each class Assume tanks on average half fullAssume tanks on average half full Assume vessels >20,000 DWT tonnes carry IFO380+Assume vessels >20,000 DWT tonnes carry IFO380+ Bunkers passing through Dover Strait in 2004 = 30 Bunkers passing through Dover Strait in 2004 = 30

million tonnesmillion tonnes Value seems high compared with other estimates, Value seems high compared with other estimates,

perhaps because tanks not always filled when perhaps because tanks not always filled when bunkeringbunkering

Also does not include non-Dover Strait vessels in UKPCZAlso does not include non-Dover Strait vessels in UKPCZ Bunker volume results inconclusive: probably Bunker volume results inconclusive: probably

between 20 and 30 million tonnes in UKPCZbetween 20 and 30 million tonnes in UKPCZ For routeing plots, 30 million tonnes in UKPCZ usedFor routeing plots, 30 million tonnes in UKPCZ used

[email protected]

Trends – BP Review of World Energy Trends – BP Review of World Energy 20042004

Global Demand for RFO

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020

Year

Mill

ion

to

nn

es

Bunkers

Inland demand

[email protected]

Trends in UKPCZTrends in UKPCZ VHFO Cargoes almost doubled in volume VHFO Cargoes almost doubled in volume

between 1998 and 2003:between 1998 and 2003:

1998 1998 26 million tonnes26 million tonnes

20032003 50 million tonnes50 million tonnes Imports to Netherlands increased from 8 million Imports to Netherlands increased from 8 million

tonnes to 16 million tonnes (1998 to 2003).tonnes to 16 million tonnes (1998 to 2003). Russian RFO traffic thro’ Baltic Sea increased Russian RFO traffic thro’ Baltic Sea increased

from 12.5 million tonnes to 27.5 million tonnesfrom 12.5 million tonnes to 27.5 million tonnes Estimate that bunkers increased from 23 million Estimate that bunkers increased from 23 million

tonnes to 30 million tonnes but no accurate tonnes to 30 million tonnes but no accurate datadata

[email protected]

VHFO bunkers and cargoes VHFO bunkers and cargoes routeingrouteing

Annual tonnage

40,000,000 to 50,000,00030,000,000 to 40,000,00020,000,000 to 30,000,00010,000,000 to 20,000,000

5,000,000 to 10,000,0002,000,000 to 5,000,0001,000,000 to 2,000,000

0 to 1,000,000

LegendUK Pollution Control Zone

[email protected]

Thank you for listeningThank you for listening

That’s the sharp end - not so sharp as it used to be of course.

Questions?

[email protected]