types of studies and study design. research classifications observational vs. experimental...
TRANSCRIPT
Research classifications• Observational vs. Experimental
Observational – researcher collects info on attributes or measurements of interest, but does not influence results.
Experimental – researcher deliberately influences events and investigates the effects of the intervention, e.g. clinical trials and laboratory experiments.
We often use these when we are interested in studying the effect of a treatment on individuals or experimental units.
Experiments & Observational Studies
We conduct an experiment when it is (ethically, physically etc) possible for the experimenter to determine which experimental units receive which treatment.
Experiments & Observational StudiesExperiment Terminology
Experimental Unit Treatment Response
patient drug cholesterol
patient pre-surgery antibiotic infection
mouse radiation mortality
Experiments & Observational Studies
In an observational study, we compare the units that happen to have received each of the treatments.
e.g. You cannot set up a control (non-smoking) group and treatment (smoking) group.
Observational Study
patient smoking lung cancer
RN unit job stresswalleye waterway Hg level
Experiments & Observational Studies
Unit Treatment Response
Experiments & Observational Studies
Note:
Only a well-designed and well-executed experiment can reliably establish causation.
An observational study is useful for identifying possible causes of effects, but it cannot reliably establish causation.
1. Completely Randomized Design
The treatments are allocated entirely by
chance to the experimental units.
1. Completely Randomized Design
Example:
Which of two varieties of tomatoes (A & B) yield a greater quantity of market quality fruit?
Factors that may affect yield:• different soil fertility levels• exposure to wind/sun• soil pH levels• soil water content etc.
Divide the field into plots and randomly allocate the tomato varieties (treatments) to each plot (unit).
8 plots – 4 get variety A
(A) (A) (A)
(A)(B) (B)
(B)
(B)
1. Completely Randomized Design
What if the field sloped upward from left to right?
UPHILL
Discuss for ½ Minute
(B)
(B)
(B) (B
)(A)
(A)
Randomly assign A & B varieties in each strip of similar elevation.
1. Completely Randomized Design
Note:
Randomization is an attempt to make the treatment groups as similar as possible — we can only expect to achieve this when there is a large number of experimental units to choose from.
2. BlockingGroup (block) experimental units by some known factor and then randomize within each block in an attempt to balance out the unknown factors.
Use:•blocking for known factors
(e.g. slope of field in previous example)
and•randomization for unknown factors to try to “balance things out”.
2. Blocking
Example 2: Multi-Center Clinical Trial
Suppose a Mayo clinical trial comparing two chemotherapy regimens in treatment of patients with colon cancer will be conducted using cancer patients in Scottsdale, AZ and Rochester, MN.
Scottsdale Rochester
2. Blocking
How should we allocate treatments to the 12 patients?
Discuss in groups for 1/2 minute.
7 (B)
2 (A)
3 (A)
5 (A) 6 (A)
1 (A)
2 (B)3 (A)
4 (B)
8 (B)
4 (B)
1 (B)
Randomly assign treatments to 4 the patients from Scottsdale and then to the 8 Rochester patients.
2. Blocking
Example 3: Comparing Three Pain Relievers for Headache Sufferers
• How could blocking be used to increase precision of a designed experiment to control to compare the pain relievers?
• What are some other design issues?
Example 4: Comparing 17 Different Leg Wraps on Used on Race Horses
• 17 “boots” tested, each boot is tested n = 5 times. Why?
• Because of the time constraints all boots were not tested on the same day.
• 8 tested 1st day, 5 tested 2nd day, 4 tested 3rd day.
• Leg was placed in freezer and thawed before the 2nd and 3rd days of testing.
Horse Leg Wraps (cont’d)
• What problems do you foresee with this experimental design? Discuss
• What actually happened?
What are the implications of these results? Discuss
Forces readings obtained from cadaver leg when no boot or wrap was used.
3. People as Experimental Units
Example: Cholesterol Drug Study – Suppose we wish to determine whether a drug will help lower the cholesterol level of patients who take it.
How should we design our study?
Discuss for two minutes in groups.
The Salk Vaccine Field Trial
• 1954 Public Health Service organized an experiment to test the effectiveness of Salk’s vaccine.
• Need for experiment:– Polio, an epidemic disease with cases
varying considerably from year to year. A drop in polio after vaccination could mean either:• Vaccine effective• No epidemic that year
The Salk Vaccine Field Trial
Subjects: 2 million, Grades 1, 2, and 3
• 500,000 were vaccinated– (Treatment Group)
• 1 million deliberately not vaccinated– (Control Group)
• 500,000 not vaccinated - parental permission denied
The Salk Vaccine Field TrialNFIP Design
• Treatment Group: Grade 2
• Control Group: Grades 1 and 3 + No Permission
Flaws ? Discuss for 30 seconds.• Polio contagious, spreading through contact.
i.e. incidence could be greater in Grade 2 (bias against vaccine), or vice-versa.
• Control group included children without parental permission (usually children from lower income families) whereas Treatment group could not (bias against the vaccine).
The Salk Vaccine Field TrialDouble-Blinded Randomized Controlled Experimental Design• Control group only chosen from those with
parental permission for vaccination• Random assignment to treatment or control
group• Use of placebo (control group given injection of
salted water)• Diagnosticians not told which group the subject
came from (polio can be difficult to diagnose)• i.e., a double-blind randomized controlled
experiment
(NFIP rate)
(25) Grade 2
(54) Grade 1/3
(44) Grade 2
The Salk Vaccine Field Trial
The double-blind randomized controlled experiment (and NFIP) results
Size ofgroup
Rate per 100,000
Treatment 200,000 28
Control 200,000 71
No consent 350,000 46
3. People as Experimental Units• control group:
– Receive no treatment or an existing treatment
• blinding: – Subjects don’t know which
treatment they receive• double blind:
– Subjects and administers / diagnosticians are blinded
• placebo: – Inert dummy treatment
3. People as Experimental Units
• placebo effect:– A common response in humans
when they believe they have been treated.
– Approximately 35% of people respond positively to dummy treatments - the placebo effect
Observational Studies
• There are two major types of observational studies:
prospective and retrospective studies
Observational Studies
1. Prospective Studies– (looking forward)
– Choose samples now, measure variables and follow up in the future.
– E.g., choose a group of smokers and non-smokers now and observe their health in the future.
Observational Studies
– Looks back at the past.– E.g., a case-control study
• Separate samples for cases and controls (non-cases).
• Look back into the past and compare histories.
• E.g. choose two groups: lung cancer patients and non-lung cancer patients. Compare their smoking histories.
2. Retrospective Studies – (looking back)
Observational Studies
Important Note:
1. Observational studies should use some form of random sampling to obtain representative samples.
2. Observational studies cannot reliably establish causation.
Controlling for various factors
• A prospective study was carried out over 11 years on a group of smokers and non-smokers showed that there were 7 lung cancer deaths per 100,000 in the non-smoker sample, but 166 lung cancer deaths per 100,000 in the smoker sample.
• This still does not show smoking causes lung cancer because it could be that smokers smoke because of stress and that this stress causes lung cancer.
Controlling for various factors
• To control for this factor we might divide our samples into different stress categories. We then compare smokers and non-smokers who are in the same stress category.
• This is called controlling for a confounding factor.
Example 1• “Home births give babies a good chance”
NZ Herald, 1990– An Australian report was stated to have said that
babies are twice as likely to die during or soon after a hospital delivery than those from a home birth.
– The report was based upon simple random samples of home births and hospital births.
Q: Does this mean hospitals are dangerous places to have babies in Australia? Why or why not? Discuss for 1 minute in groups.
Example 2
• “Lead Exposure Linked to Bad Teeth in Children” ~ USA Today
The study involved 24,901 children ages 2 and older. It showed that the greater the child’s exposure to lead, the more decayed or missing teeth.
Q: Does this show lead exposure causes tooth decay in children? Why or why not?
Discuss for 1 minute.
Example 2 ~ cont’d
• “Lead Exposure Linked to Bad Teeth in Children” ~ USA Today
Researcher:
“We controlled for income level, the proportion of diet due to carbohydrates, calcium in the diet and the number of days since the last dental visit.”
Additional Example 1 – Determine Whether Age at 1st Pregnancy is a Risk Factor for Cervical Cancer
How might we proceed?
Discuss
Additional Example 2 – Conduct a study to determine if sentencing of convicted felons is racially biased?
How might we proceed? Discuss