tripharn teki, nick small, shawn boughey, karolina latkoska spqm / sep

11
Tripharn Teki, Nick Small, Shawn Boughey, Karolina Latkoska SPQM / SEP

Upload: dina-mcbride

Post on 13-Jan-2016

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Tripharn Teki, Nick Small, Shawn Boughey, Karolina Latkoska SPQM / SEP

Tripharn Teki, Nick Small, Shawn Boughey, Karolina Latkoska

SPQM / SEP

Page 2: Tripharn Teki, Nick Small, Shawn Boughey, Karolina Latkoska SPQM / SEP

Tripharn Teki, Nick Small, Shawn Boughey, Karolina Latkoska

What?

Project Plan

•Project Charter•Project Management Plan•Risk Mgt Plan•Change Mgt Plan•Project Quality Plan•Comm Plan•Project Closure Document

Requirements Analysis

•Use Case Diagram•Use Case Narratives•SSDs•DFDs•Domain Diagram

Design Specification•Functional Specifications•System Architecture•Database Specification•GUI Specification

Page 3: Tripharn Teki, Nick Small, Shawn Boughey, Karolina Latkoska SPQM / SEP

Tripharn Teki, Nick Small, Shawn Boughey, Karolina Latkoska

When?

Page 4: Tripharn Teki, Nick Small, Shawn Boughey, Karolina Latkoska SPQM / SEP

Tripharn Teki, Nick Small, Shawn Boughey, Karolina Latkoska

Who?

Project PlanRequirements

Design Specification

TriphanCharter

SchedulingDB Design

KarolinaQuality PlanComm PlanChange Plan

NickRisk Plan

UML ModelsIssues Register

ShawnGUI

ArchitectureFunc Specs

Page 5: Tripharn Teki, Nick Small, Shawn Boughey, Karolina Latkoska SPQM / SEP

Tripharn Teki, Nick Small, Shawn Boughey, Karolina Latkoska

How much?Face to Face •~3 hr/pp/pw

•Client questions, discussion and clarification, of issues, action items, task allocation, presenting to client

Online •~2 hr/pp/pw•Monitoring changes, team communications, client questions

Individual •~6 hr/pp/pw•Writing deliverable documents, reviewing documents from team members

Page 6: Tripharn Teki, Nick Small, Shawn Boughey, Karolina Latkoska SPQM / SEP

Tripharn Teki, Nick Small, Shawn Boughey, Karolina Latkoska

Risks•Limited time•Unclear requirements•Inability to convey requirements

Changes

•Scope confined to design•Additional deliverables

Issues•Format consistency

Page 7: Tripharn Teki, Nick Small, Shawn Boughey, Karolina Latkoska SPQM / SEP

Tripharn Teki, Nick Small, Shawn Boughey, Karolina Latkoska

Risk

ID risk

Assess risk

Manage risk

Monitor risk

Page 8: Tripharn Teki, Nick Small, Shawn Boughey, Karolina Latkoska SPQM / SEP

Tripharn Teki, Nick Small, Shawn Boughey, Karolina Latkoska

Risk Assessment Matrix

CONSEQUENCE

Insignificant Minor Moderate Major Catastrophic

LIKELI

HOOD

Almost certain Medium High High Extreme Extreme

Likely Medium Medium High High Extreme

Possible Low Medium Medium High Extreme

Unlikely Low Medium Medium High High

Rare Low Low Medium Medium High

AS/NZS 4360:2004 Risk Management

Page 9: Tripharn Teki, Nick Small, Shawn Boughey, Karolina Latkoska SPQM / SEP

Tripharn Teki, Nick Small, Shawn Boughey, Karolina Latkoska

Risk ExampleDescription Likelihood Consequence Risk

Rating

Risk Control

Team members have limited time and availability

Almost certain Major Extreme Clear action items each week

Review progress weekly: identify delays, formulate action to address

Communicate requests for help through Wikispaces

Page 10: Tripharn Teki, Nick Small, Shawn Boughey, Karolina Latkoska SPQM / SEP

Tripharn Teki, Nick Small, Shawn Boughey, Karolina Latkoska

Quality

Develop

quality

criteria

Develop

quality test proce

ss

Develop in-

process

quality monito

ring

Conduct in-

process

quality monito

ring

Conduct

quality and UAT

testing

Page 11: Tripharn Teki, Nick Small, Shawn Boughey, Karolina Latkoska SPQM / SEP

Tripharn Teki, Nick Small, Shawn Boughey, Karolina Latkoska

Change

What is

the change?

What is

the benefit?

What will

it take

?

What if we don’t

?

Quality

and risk?