trip report: nevada nuclear waste storage …tines that correspond to the observat1ons made in the...
TRANSCRIPT
6 _I --- Ib
-
WM PrY 1/~X~ tNo. *,
LPDR z_ _ _ _ _ ~ ~ ~ ___S E P -_P 1 6 1981 ,.
(Return to WM, 623 _SS) -___WMHT:- 00 14& -_ I
/0tDistribution: °tWMHT file 'BDttfWMHT r/f RGoldsmithCF HFonteciltaNMSS r/f TMarshWM r/f SLawroskiJBMartin DMoeller-REBrowning - CMark
- RJWright & r/f -LDoyle ..
e d..Lhman
PTPrestholtIvlWBell -
I
. . . . s
MEMORANDUM FOR:
FROM:
Hubert J. Miller. Chief High-Level Waste Technical
Development BranchDivision of Waste Management
Robert J. Wright.High-Level Waste Technical
Development BranchDivision of aste Management
SUBJECT: TRIP REPORT:PEER REVIEW.
NEVADA NUCLEAR WASTE STORAGE INVESTIGATIONSLAS VEGAS, AUGUST24-28, 1981.
0rmanization of MeetingThis meeting, the e ghth n a.sertes, covered a bryoadier spectrum of NWSIpnoject activities than previous ,per reviews The reviewers (dentif ledin figures 1. 2, 3) were divided amongthr.eegeneralsubjects: geology/hydrology, geotechnical/geoengineerng studies. and environmental-studies.From Monday morning. August 24,..through.tariyjTuesday -ilternoon, presenta ionswere made by the investigators to, the collective peer review group. Then,through early Thursday afternoon, the three reyew groups separately heardand discussed presentations on selected topis. Finally, the iellectivelreview group met in executive session through FrIday.,
About 130 observers were on hand., .
On Tuesday I provided to the collective rooup -ashort overview 'onthepresent status of 10 CFR 60. ,
Developments since the.Februiary NRC visitThe most striking impression to.me s thereorientation of the work alongtines that correspond to the observat1ons made in the NRC trip reportcovering the February trip to TS. *Espeocjally.tnotbWi s the attentionnow being given to 10 CFR 60.. which was described as,"the glue that holdsthe pieces together." The requirements of' the site characterization reportand the approach for the NRC review yere accurately escribed (figures4, 5 and 6). The schedule for SCR preparation and the NRC review (threemonths) was presented (figure) aind discussed. The U.S. eologicalSurvey showed a schedule of 19 geologic, hydrologic and geobWysical studiesfor which the SCR is the "drivtng force" In planntng. The SCR was describedas a "very good vehicle to inform-the public" aout project activities.
Other developments, too, are cnsonant with NRC' s trip observations:-
- The Bullfrog tuff is beingaassessed as-to ts strength and theanticipated stresses on underground openings at repository depthi Other. . _J2;>4ocle;1digan aboxe thr t r t ssdlt than lQp ee dep
OFFICEP -are ing examined or favorabil ty.,,. ............ ~......... ............ ..................... ........................... .........,,............
SURNAMEO 6 810916-e-311290243 810916 .... ................ .. .. ...........
DATEti PDR WASTE t I 7--- * 11 PDR .... .......... ........... ......... _ _.. , .... .. _._ _._._.
I NC FORM 318 410O80P NRCM 0240 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
2
-9)uality assurance was entioned as an integral part of sevqralstudies.
- During September, the parameters-,of seismic exploration will bestudied on Yucca Mountain to detefiminewhether a r nefjed seismic approachwill work.
- There is improved integration of project elements..
- An interface with the national ,program is .pjnnedon performanceassessment. .
Pro ect ScheduleATiRb oitionof proJect plnning as taken place ince introduction ofthe test and evaluation facility (TEF).concept.- The TEF s intended to
. demonstrate (and win public confidence in) methods of receiving, transporting,retrieving, and shielding two to three hundred.HIW waste packages. It willbe constructed at one of three places: NTS, BWIP, or salt.
The present schedule is: ,1982 October. 3D performance assessment of tuffhorizons.
December. Select horizon and locate explqratory shaft (ES).
1983 March. Start site preparation fortheES. See figures 8 and 9 forcost estimates.and aetivities schedule ,,
June. Submit the SCR to NRC.,September. Start to sink ES. , .. ,
1984 June. Complete repository..coqeptual design report.
1985 September. "Confirm site" forW - ,
1986 December. Start at-depth)test fiac-1ty for,detailed. .s1te-_> characterization. Start TEF, ifKS is selected, among three
sites, for the TEF.,
The schedule for national program a4ctylytes 1s shown.,1ftgure 10. TheNNYSI program through FY 86 is sipwn 1r,,figure,11 ,
CommentsThere is a new note, n the NNWSi prject, qf heightened attention to licensingneeds and programmatic milestones.,, A number of geosc1qnce and geotechnicalquestions are, naturally, outstanding., These are being addressed and there isa sense of improved coordination amorqg .thq tasks.
However, two problems are presented to us in theplanning for the site '
characterization report. ,
_
OFFICE ...
SURNAMEO .......... ........
EDATEO ,
_ I _ __ = __ _ _ _ _ _ I _ _.. _ _..
. .__ _
NRC FORM 318 110/80) NRCM 240 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY * USGPCF'%80�,329_624
1. The SCR will cover only tES and-the mited teitng therein.This s perceived as satisfying .the site thracthei rat on_wict1on describedin 10 CFR 60. -. . ..
2. Only 3 months allowed for aalyses ofhe SCR byNRC..QPJGID;AL SIGNED~ pY
Pbert J. WrightHigh-Level Waste Technical
Development BranchDivision of Waste Management _*,
=
V.--
EnclosuressAs stated
i
iIiI
I
Ii
I
iiII
ii
-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~, --
OFFICE . WMHT M, ~~~~~~~~~..... ...................... ..................... ..................... ..................... ..................SRAEO ] Jr m T ...................... ................ ...,......... ................. ........ ..................... ....................IDATEt 9/ /8i 9ljc /81.................. ...... . ......... ............ ......... ..................... .......... ................ ........................ ..... ....................
SURNAM~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ J~~~~~~yi~~~~~~~g*~~~~~~~*;1m~~~~~~~~~~dT. yes'~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
NRC FORM 318 tO0X80) NRCM 0240 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY * USGPO: 1980-329-24
ft
N EVADANUCLEAR WASTE STORAGE
INVESTIGATIONS.
PEER REVIEW- I -
inUU U - -
RIVIERA HOTELLAS VEGAS, NEVADA
AUGUST 24-28, 1981
I - UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY-'4NEVADA OPERATIONS OFFICE- LAS VEGAS. NEVADAIi-
I 4
NNWSI
GEOLOGICAL/HYDROLOGICAL
PEER REVIEW
SESSION CHAIRMAN:.P
PEER LIAISON:
W. S.
J. T.TWENHOFEL
NEAL
PEER REVIEWER
PATRICK A. DOMENICO
LARRY T. LARSON
HOWARD P. Ross
RUDY C. Eis
ALAN S. RYALL
H. FRANK MORRISON
AFFILIATION
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS
UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA, RENO
UNIVERSITY OF UTAH
RESEARCH INSTITUTE
COLORADO SCHOOL OF MINES
UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA, RENO
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA,
BERKELEY
GEORGE A. THOMPSON
ROBERT N. FARVOLDEN
PAUL R. FENSKE
JOHN B. FARR
KONRAD B. KRAUSKOPF
STANFORD UNIVERSITY
UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO
DESERT RESEARCH INSTITUTE
WESTERN GEOPHYSICAL CO.
STANFORD UNIVERSITY
" _ T.S
I
NNWSI
GEOTECHNICAL/GEOENGINEERING
PEER REVIEW
SESSION CHAIRMAN: M* ' KUNICH
PEER LIAISON: JqAA. FERNANDEZ
.
-
J
-i
EE ELEkER-
JOHN W. HANDIN
RICHARD V. WYMAN
CHRISTOPHER M. ST. JOHN
ROGER STAEHLE
JOSEPH BUSCH
PETER K. FROBENIUS
AE.J. .. ..
TEXAS A & M
UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA,
LAS VEGAS
J.F.T. AGAPITO ASSOC IATE
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
KAISER ENGINEERS
BECHTEL NATIONAL, INC.
'Fe 2-
II'
II
A
1ls
1
1
1
l
7
I,
NNWSI
VIRONMENTAL STUDIES
PEER REVIEW
H. W MELANCON
* LINCOLN
SESSIONICHAIRMAN:
PEER LIAISON:
PEER REVIEWER
PRESTON H. HUNTER
HELEN F. GRAM
ROBERT F. KAUFMAN
FORD, BACON DAVIS
Los ALAMOS TECHNICAL
ASSOCIATES
CONVERSE WARD DAVIS
DIXON, INC.
. L. .. A
j C j ; , I r v r i , , , ! 1 , ! t - - ! tL S i .- *.'
c
f , 't It3 ,*4 -
-,c.- OiJECTIVES SITE CATACTERIZATION
0 Collect uff i dent ,n4formVnci s.&that cofnstruction-
appIicdr(On wtI b cpbafe, in0 M R-...... i. . ttihat mean l;ngfuI *c- g w .............. ._ . .
evgaluation will e poss i ble rejarcL ivi9 sLte
s LitaO b i Lt9 a n cotrepositorJ f1or 1h
nomt-tifX f desi*Mt 0. - Iw- -, .-i, >, " . "_ 5 . . ,.,
fartic lar Sdt .
a spe ct of &L
'N Coll ect recessar9 tt f rc m a errimtwe sifes.. . .
I anc[ medli to permit NRC to ma1(e. di MEPA f.nd,,n (
onf the.
appl,'3 . I..'ft Proposed in DOE-s I
CLTeo n
..
t I i ; -1 1. * . t ! r> S , a !. , , .
SITE CHARACTERIZATION REPORT*
* WHERE WE ARE
- GEOGRAPHICAL
- TECHNICAL
* IkL WE GOT THERE- SELECTION METHOD/CRITERIA
* WHY CHOSEN
O IaUEa AND MEANS OF RESOLUTION
mT~J O SITE CHARACTERIZATION PROGRAM/QA
* R&D
*1OCFR60 (ADMIN) - FEBRUARY 25, 1981
. .. j .,
NRC REVIEW OF SCR
1. HAVE IMPORTANT ISSUES BEEN IDENTIFIED?
2. DOES SCR SPECIFICALLY ADDRESS AND LEAD TO RESOLUTION
OF EACH ISSUE?
3. ARE TESTING AND ANALYTICAL METHODS APPROPRIATE?
4. RE #3, HAVE ALTERNATIVE METHODS BEEN EVALUATED
THOROUGHLY?
5. WILL THE DATA GENERATED IN THE TESTING AND USED IN
THE ANALYSES BE OF ADEQUATE QUALITY?
.:~ ot (
I I I I f t p * ? I i '* :-J '; ,i1 'I _!
( SITE
. - _.. _.~ _ _ ._,! .. tj r
CIIARACTERI( TIOs REPJij-i' 1, !XIl .J .% ,.. & ._ti4r ~
N#JWS I
SCR II 'nni;;
Forma Ito CM60
-Tec h- Ride- v~~~~-reti _ew
5a~thri 9I
ConftrdbtorI~~~~~~~~~~~refraonr -I
,e i tM af ammsZ-,
Arf t1t SCR,
I NWTSSCR
\--
1
Iarevist revisio" / \
NRCreview I
commence{ IEX p forcaterg
SUAzt A
FY FY 83
I I i. I i $ I j., ., I:- .1 k� " a I , i 4, .. a I. � . 8 I Al a a k . a 4 .. . I .. . I . 0I
C C
I
EXPLORATORY SHAFTPRO J ECT COST EST I MATE
(DOLLARS I N TOUSAN4DS)
ENGINEERING $2,200
CONSTRUCT I ONS ITE WORK AND SURFACE FAC I LI TIES 4,100DR ILL ING AND CAS ING 23,300MINING 14.600
MAI NTIENANCE AND OPERAT IONS 3,0800
SUBTOTAL BAS IC OPERAT ING EXPENSE $48,000
CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 6,400
TOTAL BASIC PROJECT ESTIMATE $54,400
ADDITIONAL CAPITAL EQUIPMENT $2,200 to 7,800
ADDITIONAL OPERATING EXPENSE EQUIPMENT 0 o 2,200
TOTAL PROJECT COST ESTIMATE (RANGE) $56,600 to 62,300
r~~~r~~s Aflrb~~~~~~ WX-4 7-81
c -i
(pTI
0
QN)I
iuw kw A" * 6w 6A% Lg , u. L.-A a , . w-A ko-- -- I
C cI
EXPLORATORY SHAFT
DES I GN AND CONSTRUCT I ON SCHEDULE
ACT I VI TY
CONCEPTUAL DES I GN REPORT (DRAFT)
START COMPLETE
T I TLE I AND 11 ENG I NEER I NGS I TE WORK AND SURFACEDR I LL I NG OPERAT I ONSMINING OPERATIONS
4/81
4/8210/8210/83
FACILITIES
9/81
3/845/835/84
CONSTRUCT I ON AND T I TLE III ENG I NEER I NGSITE WORK AND SURFACE FACILITIESDR I LL I NG OPERAT I ONSOUTFITTING SHAFT AND SURFACE PLANTMININGHORIZONTAL DRILLING
-1
1/839/836/848/8412/84
4/8210/8210/82
5/845/84
1/849/85
1/846/831/84
CCAPITAL EQUIPMENTSITE WORK ANDDRILLINGMINING
PROCUREMENTSURFACE FACILITIES
Lmma WX-4 -1All�u� WX-4 8-81
L .. 1 t I t l !t; ' t ( ! -! ! - !
f9z C I * C ! t, ! t ; : I I !''l try il'4
C C.;I '
i
TCALUMMIAL ISOLATION PROGnA[wE <i A
YE*{AS@ 81YEARS 131 18 o '8 I 7 ' 89' '91 93 96 1 971 99 1 l 03' '06 I
T E E FACILITY INCREMENT CASEPLANNINO En| t I1NSTRUC
I -8ESQN
__I I _
HANPORD BASALT 8HAR f-
_
IAt I3
, ~I It t-HNOLOGY I, I
, - bMtLOPMRINT / ~~tM 5Jt
.A. CA.F - _1~ c. _m = =3
NTS TUFFI �--i O.L.
a _ _ p
IW.. ~f
BEDDED SALTISHAFT I II
FInhtREPloOhldf
1I 7- v--rn --
tDESIGN
-�-
CONSTRUCT SALT HARDROCK CDOME SALT
.__
I6HAffSITE 4 AND
_ _ __ _" _ ISITES AVAILABLE FOR
LATER SELECTION
KA STAnTV COMPLETE* STARTUPo REPOSITORY SITE SUITABILITY DETERMINED* SITE SELECTION
L.A. LICENSE APPLICATIONC.A. CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIzATIONO.L. OPERATING LICENSE
J
t- s t t r i -r . j oW: t-- aX~ . i I..; .j i;f .' t .~ L.!:c i ; .... ........... t 1. , ? .. 1
NNWS1 PROIECT INTEGRATIONc , . .
..~ .,
I4,
9
NVTSDOCUS
i
GNtVuR.STUsiEs
MAVlt .
\Pait
EACRDATA
INVENTORP.4
.1 4 EIS
RepostoUj
S;e.ation
, E 3M
AESDATA COLLECTION$ ANALYSIS 4 AssEsSMcN7 - - j',
LiCatIsNoDrAft ScRSCRA N WTS A
'REVIEW/
TITLE x g TITLE I 9 F
TEF CDRCONCEPT CONCEPTUALA
DEVELOPMENT OESIGN
SEIIANNUAL UPDATES , _
CON C;EPTUALDESIGN4
FUNCTIONALDtESIG
1AFT C4TRUCTIO4H F ozsrtNr 0
TEFS. crf.
7/8S
R' pit s2tar
\ cm 7/86&
TEF TITLE IDESIGN
TITLE IDESIGN
9/86£rPas, TORYCONtCIP TMAL
ORSIGA/ 1 /84,REPO/etr REMRTMY
7TIw*__W""
! 2Y I FY8aqa I
I FY*83 I FY* 84. I FY * 85 I 86 I