tree survey report to bs5837:2012 › media › 3620 › ea... · 2019-11-11 · pruning of...

46
Tree Survey Report BS 5837:2012 Alyth 275 / 400 kV Substation and Associated Works Neil McKay MICFor September 2019

Upload: others

Post on 07-Jul-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Tree Survey Report to BS5837:2012 › media › 3620 › ea... · 2019-11-11 · pruning of branches on one tree in Area C. Baseline Factors . 4.4. The site falls within the jurisdiction

Tree Survey Report BS 5837:2012 Alyth 275 / 400 kV Substation and Associated Works

Neil McKay MICFor September 2019

Page 2: Tree Survey Report to BS5837:2012 › media › 3620 › ea... · 2019-11-11 · pruning of branches on one tree in Area C. Baseline Factors . 4.4. The site falls within the jurisdiction
Page 3: Tree Survey Report to BS5837:2012 › media › 3620 › ea... · 2019-11-11 · pruning of branches on one tree in Area C. Baseline Factors . 4.4. The site falls within the jurisdiction

Contents Summary

1 Introduction 2 Third Party Liability 3 Methodology 4 Tree Survey Results 5 Arboricultural Impact Assessment 6 Tree Protection Measures 7 Mitigating Tree Loss & New Tree Planting 8 Post Development Pressure 9 Summary 10 Recommendations Appendices Appendix A: Tree Survey Areas Appendix B: Schedule of Trees Appendix C: Tree Survey Plan with Root Protection Area Appendix D: Terms used in schedule Appendix E: Tree Protection Plan Appendix F: Photographic Record

Page 4: Tree Survey Report to BS5837:2012 › media › 3620 › ea... · 2019-11-11 · pruning of branches on one tree in Area C. Baseline Factors . 4.4. The site falls within the jurisdiction
Page 5: Tree Survey Report to BS5837:2012 › media › 3620 › ea... · 2019-11-11 · pruning of branches on one tree in Area C. Baseline Factors . 4.4. The site falls within the jurisdiction

Executive Summary

Scottish Hydro Electric Transmission Plc (SHE Transmission) is proposing to construct a new 275 / 400 kilovolt

(kV) substation (and associated infrastructure) (hereafter referred to as the Proposed Development) on land

450 metres (m) to the north-west of Haughend Farm, approximately 3.5 km to the south-east of the town of

Alyth in Perth and Kinross.

The trees to be impacted by the Proposed Development have been surveyed and assessed in accordance with

BS 5837:2012 "Trees in relation to design, demolition and construction – Recommendations1."

Perth and Kinross Council interactive heritage map shows no entries for Tree Preservation Order (TPO) or

other conservation status at the shelterbelts near Haughend Farm.

Enquiry of Scottish Forestry Land Information Search (LIS) listed Native Woodland Integrated habitat –

secondary zone as touching the NW corner of the shelterbelts.

Although the trees likely to be impacted by the Proposed Development have been individually assessed the shelterbelts can be treated as woodlands. The overall condition was considered fair with an overall category B “trees of moderate quality with an estimated remaining life expectancy of at least 20 years” and collectively the tree quality assessment falls into the categories B2 where trees are present in numbers, growing as groups or woodlands, such that they attract a higher collective rating than they might as individuals. The creation of an access for the Proposed Development will require the felling of 26 trees. The remainder should be protected from damage by implementing a Tree Protection Area.

1 The British Standards Institution (2012) Trees in relation to design, demolition and construction

– Recommendations, BSI Standards Publication

Page 6: Tree Survey Report to BS5837:2012 › media › 3620 › ea... · 2019-11-11 · pruning of branches on one tree in Area C. Baseline Factors . 4.4. The site falls within the jurisdiction

Arboricultural Report

1. Introduction

1.1. Scottish Hydro Electric Transmission Plc (SHE Transmission) is proposing to construct a new 275 / 400

kilovolt (kV) substation (and associated infrastructure) (hereafter referred to as the Proposed

Development) on land 450 metres (m) to the north-west of Haughend Farm, approximately 3.5 km to

the south-east of the town of Alyth in Perth and Kinross.

1.2. A tree survey has been carried out by Neil Mckay Forestry Consultant Limited on the trees that are

going to be impacted by construction of the Proposed Development.

2. Third Party Liability

2.1. The limit of Neil McKay Forestry Consultant Limited indemnity over any matter arising out of this

report extends only to the instructing client. Neil McKay Forestry Consultant Limited cannot be held

liable for any third-party claim that arises following this report.

3. Methodology

3.1. The trees have been surveyed and classified in accordance with BS 5837:2012 "Trees in relation to

design, demolition and construction - Recommendations". BS 5837:2012 provides recommendations

relating to tree care, with a view to achieving a harmonious and sustainable relationship between

new construction/existing structures and their surrounding trees. The standard follows a logical

sequence of events that has tree care at the heart of the process, Figure 1 of the standard illustrates

the design and construction process and tree care.2

3.2. The survey was undertaken using the Visual Tree Assessment (VTA) methodology to conduct a

preliminary assessment of the above ground portion of the tree.

Visual Tree Assessment Survey Method

3.3. The trees included in the survey are shown in Appendix A, which include the roadside trees to the

north-west of the Proposed Development (Area A), the shelterbelt to the west of the Proposed

Development (Area B) and roadside trees to the north of the public road (Area C).

3.4. An individual detailed tree inspection was carried out on all trees within Area A and Area C, as there

is potential for trees in these areas to be impacted by the proposed construction works, namely

construction of the proposed access track. All trees within Area B were visited and recorded by

species, but as no intervention is planned, no detailed individual visual tree inspection was carried

out and instead this area is categorised as a woodland group and described in more general terms.

3.5. Each individual tree surveyed referred to the information included under ‘the schedule of trees’ and

‘category grading for the assessment of tree quality’ set out in BS 5837:2012, included in Appendix D

for information.

3.6. The individual tree survey was undertaken from ground level. No aerial inspection nor invasive

probing or drilling has been undertaken. No excavations were carried out nor soil or root samples

taken.

2 BS 5837:2012 Figure 1 The design and construction process and tree care

Page 7: Tree Survey Report to BS5837:2012 › media › 3620 › ea... · 2019-11-11 · pruning of branches on one tree in Area C. Baseline Factors . 4.4. The site falls within the jurisdiction

3.7. The height of each individual tree was estimated using a clinometer and measuring tape.

3.8. The canopy spread of each individual tree was measured on four compass points using a measuring

tape; however, where access was difficult, the spread was estimated.

3.9. Diameter at breast height (dbh) was taken of each individual tree with a rounded down girth tape.

3.10. The position of each tree was recorded using a Trimble Juno handheld GPS. The data was

downloaded onto software designed for the BS 5837:2012 tree survey.

Page 8: Tree Survey Report to BS5837:2012 › media › 3620 › ea... · 2019-11-11 · pruning of branches on one tree in Area C. Baseline Factors . 4.4. The site falls within the jurisdiction

4. Tree Survey Results

Site Overview

4.1. The Proposed Development is located within an agricultural field currently planted with carrots, which is

gently sloping to the south. The site is bounded on the north by a minor public road and to the west by a

ditch and fence separating another agricultural field.

4.2. The trees and woodland recorded by the survey can be described as early mature mixed woodlands

comprising mainly of Douglas fir and sessile oak, while other species are represented in fewer numbers.

The trees are characteristic of planted origin, in the form of a shelterbelt to the north-west corner of the

cultivated arable field.

Project Requirements

4.3. Construction vehicles accessing the proposed substation site would utilise a new proposed access track

adjoining the public road to the north-west of the proposed substation. The track would be used to provide

access for ongoing maintenance during the lifetime of the substation. The new track would be

approximately 5.5 m in width with a 1 m verge either side of the track and would be wider at the road

junction. Construction of the new track would require the removal of a number of trees in Area A, and the

pruning of branches on one tree in Area C.

Baseline Factors

4.4. The site falls within the jurisdiction of Perth and Kinross Council. The Council’s Interactive Heritage Map3

shows no entries for Tree Preservation Order (TPO) or other conservation status at the shelterbelts near

the Proposed Development.

4.5. Scottish Forestry Land Information Search (LIS)4 listed Native Woodland Integrated habitat – secondary

zone as touching the north-west corner of the shelterbelts This has no impact on the trees being surveyed.

Existing Trees

4.6. The full schedule of trees is set out within Appendix B: Schedule of Trees, with the Tree Survey Plans

included as Appendix C and Photographic Records included in Appendix E.

4.7. The full shelterbelt measures approximately 1.04 hectares.

4.8. A total of 248 trees were recorded in Area A (0.68 ha), 110 trees within Area B (0.28 ha) and 5 trees within

Area C (0.08 ha). Douglas fir and sessile oak (Photographs 1, 2 and 3 in Appendix E) were the most common

species recorded but other conifer and broadleaved species were also found, as summarised in Table 1

below;

3 Perth & Kinross Council Interactive Heritage Map. Available at: https://www.pkc.gov.uk/heritagemap (visited

09/07/2019) 4 Scottish Forestry Information Search. Available at: https://forestry.gov.scot/support-regulations/land-information-search

(visited 09/07/2019)

Page 9: Tree Survey Report to BS5837:2012 › media › 3620 › ea... · 2019-11-11 · pruning of branches on one tree in Area C. Baseline Factors . 4.4. The site falls within the jurisdiction

Table 1: Tree Species Recorded

4.9. The tree form and health vary within the whole woodland surveyed. While there are a number of dead or

dying individual trees, the majority can be described as in fair condition in that while the foliage cover is

full, many individuals have constricted crowns and lack full development.

4.10. There are some 20 trees listed as dead (see photograph 5 in Appendix F).

4.11. The overall form of many of the broadleaved trees are misshapen with distorted stems and some forking.

However, there are a number of Douglas fir and oak in good condition and are fine examples within this

context.

4.12. Typically, there is old mechanical stem damage on some of the trees which face both the public road and

the fields. Notably, where affected beech trees in particular show signs of rot.

4.13. Some field side trees show a distinct undercutting by agricultural activity such as ploughing.

4.14. Overall while the tree form may have been affected by wind there is little evidence of wind-thrown trees

given the good overall rooting conditions.

4.15. There was one noted broken conifer top which was hanging against a tree stem and discarded field wire is

a hazard to walking in the vicinity of tree no. 167.

4.16. The understorey is mainly grasses and some natural regeneration is noted (see photograph 6 in Appendix

E).

Root Protection Area

4.17. The Root Protection Area (RPA) is described in the British Standard as a layout design tool indicating the

minimum area around a tree deemed to contain sufficient roots and rooting volume to maintain the tree’s

viability, and where the protection of the roots and soil structure is treated as a priority.

4.18. The RPA of all trees in Area A have been calculated in accordance with BS 5837:2012 and must be

considered where the proposed new access track is to be developed. The RPA is shown as a pink circle

around each stem position on the Tree Survey Plan (Appendix C).

Tree species No.

Ash (Fraxinus excelsior) 7

Beech (Fagus sylvatica) 20

Cherry, Bird (Prunus padus) 1

Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) 157

Elm sp. (Ulmus sp.) 3

Oak (Quercus petraea) 129

Pine, Scots (Pinus sylvestris) 12

Sycamore (Acer pseudoplatanus) 33

Whitebeam (Sorbus aria) 1

Total trees 363

Page 10: Tree Survey Report to BS5837:2012 › media › 3620 › ea... · 2019-11-11 · pruning of branches on one tree in Area C. Baseline Factors . 4.4. The site falls within the jurisdiction

Tree Quality

4.19. As a woodland, the overall categorization for areas A, B and C is Category B2, “Trees present in numbers,

usually growing as groups or woodlands, such that they attract a higher collective rating than they might as

individuals”.

5. Arboricultural Impact Assessment

5.1. The impact the Proposed Development would have on the shelterbelts results from the requirement to

develop a new access for construction and operation of the substation. No other elements of the Proposed

Development would have further impact on the existing trees.

5.2. Construction of the Proposed Development would result in the removal of 26 trees in an area amounting to

530m2, listed in the Schedule of Trees (Appendix B), in order to establish the proposed access track into the

substation and widening of the public road. The trees to be removed are highlighted on the Tree Survey

Plan (Appendix C). Table 2 below shows the number of trees by species to be removed.

Table 2: Trees to be removed

5.3. One sycamore tree to the north of the public road (Area C) may require pruning without recourse to felling,

to permit the access of large sided vehicles

5.4. Trees to be retained located directly adjacent to those trees to be removed are likely to require protection

from mechanical or other damage during construction and operation of the Proposed Development (see

Section 6 and Appendix E).

6. Tree Protection Measures

6.1. The tree protection measures apply to those trees being retained both adjacent to the proposed access

and from any works within the Proposed Development site.

6.2. The existing trees to be retained should be protected with protective fencing prior to construction, as

detailed in the Tree Protection Plan included in Appendix E of this report.

6.3. The protective fencing should be placed at a minimum of 9.20 m from the remaining trees based on the

calculation of 12 times the dbh.

7. Mitigating Tree Loss and New Tree Planting

7.1. Retention of neighbouring trees and woodland adjacent those trees required to be removed for

construction of the Proposed Development will continue to contribute towards the screening of the works

and long-term landscape character.

7.2. Some careful crown thinning will assist the development of fuller foliage and therefore health and vigour of

the remaining trees. During the same operation some dead trees adjacent to the public road (see Appendix

Species No.

Beech 1

Douglas fir 10

Sessile oak 9

Sycamore 6

Total 26

Page 11: Tree Survey Report to BS5837:2012 › media › 3620 › ea... · 2019-11-11 · pruning of branches on one tree in Area C. Baseline Factors . 4.4. The site falls within the jurisdiction

B: Schedule of Trees) could be removed as a matter of public safety bearing in mind the ecological benefits

of dead or decaying trees where they do not pose a safety concern.

7.3. Some natural regeneration was noted, which, if allowed to develop, will produce a natural understory to

the existing shelterbelts.

7.4. Post construction, native tree planting on earth mounds is proposed to the north, west and east of the

proposed substation (see Chapter 4 of this EA). This offers the positive opportunity to provide long term

screening of the Proposed Development and more than offsets the area of trees lost to the new access.

8. Post Development Pressure

8.1. During operation of the substation, vehicle movements would be constrained to the tarmac access road

and not pose any threat to the existing or new trees.

8.2. Maintenance of the ground around any newly planted native woodland area must safeguard damage from

strimming or mowing or similar management activities.

8.3. The native woodland transplants must be correctly planted and maintained until fully established.

8.4. Consideration must be given to protection from deer or other herbivores by the use of tree shelters.

9. Summary

9.1. The condition of the shelterbelts areas A, B and C as a whole is rated as Category B – “trees of moderate

quality with an estimated remaining life expectancy of at least 20 years” many individuals have an

estimated life expectancy of 20 – 40 years and beyond.

9.2. Felling of 26 no. of trees would be required to create an access to the Proposed Development site. Felling

will have to consider the RPA of the adjacent trees to be retained. Pruning of branches above the public

road of one tree may be required.

9.3. The retention of trees outside the construction area is most important in maintaining mature tree cover

offering some screening and continuity of ecological contribution. Their future should be safeguarded by

excluding any excavation works or deposition of material against stems within the RPA and via the erection

of protective fencing throughout the construction works to prevent damage being inflicted on any of the

existing trees to be retained.

9.4. Some careful light selective thinning would help the development of fuller tree crowns and a greater area

of foliage for continued tree health and vigour while also removing any individual trees which have the

potential to fall on the public road or substation site entrance.

9.5. Mitigation for tree loss is primarily through the planting of native trees on earth mound areas proposed to

the north, west and east of the substation site, while some natural regeneration within the existing

shelterbelt, Area A, will create an understory and continuity of tree cover.

10. Recommendations

10.1. All tree work should be undertaken by trained and competent personnel to current Industry standards and

guidance, including full Health & Safety Risk Assessment during the removal of existing trees to safeguard

the general public and substation site operatives alike.

Page 12: Tree Survey Report to BS5837:2012 › media › 3620 › ea... · 2019-11-11 · pruning of branches on one tree in Area C. Baseline Factors . 4.4. The site falls within the jurisdiction

10.2. Tree felling is close to the public road and the public must be safeguarded during this activity.

10.3. Trees to be felled as listed in the tree survey schedule (Appendix B) must be clearly identified.

10.4. The tree protection measures given in Appendix D should be applied to existing trees to be retained.

10.5. The ground where new trees are to be planted must be suitably prepared and of a suitable growing

medium.

10.6. Newly planted trees must be of good planting stock, planted with best practice plant handling and

adequately protected, inspected and maintained until satisfactorily established.

Page 13: Tree Survey Report to BS5837:2012 › media › 3620 › ea... · 2019-11-11 · pruning of branches on one tree in Area C. Baseline Factors . 4.4. The site falls within the jurisdiction

Appendix A:Tree Survey Areas

Page 14: Tree Survey Report to BS5837:2012 › media › 3620 › ea... · 2019-11-11 · pruning of branches on one tree in Area C. Baseline Factors . 4.4. The site falls within the jurisdiction

41

41

4141

41

41

41

41

41

41

41

42

42

42

40

B A

NA

NCNB

B

b

a

c

C

AUX.POWER

A

C

NEW

CABL

E TREN

CH

MSCDN

CT/M

K

STATCOM COMPOUND

SIZE 50x60m

(BASED ON RFI)

21C

22

23U

24B

25B

26B

27B

28B

29B

30B

31B32B

33U34B

35B36C

37B

38B39B

40U

41B42B43B

44B

45B

46B

47B

48B49B50B

51B52B

53B

54B

55B56B57B58B

59B60B

61B 62B 63B 64B65B

66B

67B68B

69B70U 71B

72C

73B

74B

75C

76B77C 78B

79B80B81B

82B

83B

84B

85C

86B87U

88B89B

90B

91C92B

93B94U95B

96U 97C

98B

99B

100B

101B

102B

103B

104B105B

106B

107B108U

109B110C

111C

112B

113B114B

115B

116B

117B118B

119B

120C

121B122B123B

124B

125U

126B127B

128B

129B130B

131B

132B

133B

134B

135C

136B137B

138B

139C140B

141B142B

143U

144B

145C 146B147C148B149B

150B151B

152C

153B

154B 155B

156B157B

158C159B

160B

161B

162B

163B164C

165B

166B 167B168B169B

170B171B172C

173B174B

175B

176B

177B178B179C180C

181B182B

183B184B185B

186C187B

188B189B

190B191B192B

193C194B

195C

196B197B 198C199B

200B201B

202B203C

204B

205B

206B

207B208B

209U

210C

211B

212B 213B

214B215B216C 217B 218B

219C220B

221U222B

223C

224B

225B226U

227U

228B229B

230B

231B232B

233B

234B

235B236B237B

238B

239B

240B 241C

242B243B244B

245B

246B

247B

248C

249C

250C

251C

252C

253C

±

Drawing NoDate

Alyth

1:800Scale:

Contains Ordnance Survey Open Data © Crown Copyright andDatabase Right 2019.

Neil_McKay_Rev6.017 September 2019

[email protected]

James England NDF, BSc(Hons)For, MicForGIS - Forestry - Arboriculture - Website Design

Tree Survey

@ A3 Scale

Contains OS data © CrownCopyright and database right2019

N e i l M c K a yN e i l M c K a yForestry Consultant Ltd

Grange FarmTundergarthLockerbie

DG11 2QG

Page of

Map No:

User
Rectangle
User
Typewritten Text
Overview
User
Typewritten Text
Area A
User
Typewritten Text
Area B
User
Typewritten Text
Area C
User
Pencil
User
Pencil
User
Pencil
Page 15: Tree Survey Report to BS5837:2012 › media › 3620 › ea... · 2019-11-11 · pruning of branches on one tree in Area C. Baseline Factors . 4.4. The site falls within the jurisdiction

Appendix B: Schedule of Trees

Refer to Appendix D for explanation of the Tree Survey Schedule terms

Page 16: Tree Survey Report to BS5837:2012 › media › 3620 › ea... · 2019-11-11 · pruning of branches on one tree in Area C. Baseline Factors . 4.4. The site falls within the jurisdiction

ID To Fell Species Age Tree Height (m)

DBH (mm)

Condition Estimated Life Expectancy (years)

BS5837 Category

Easting Northing

Area A 1 Douglas fir M: mature 26 800 Poor 5-10 U 328722.9 747190.1 2 Douglas fir M 20 400 Dead 5-10 U 328728.6 747146.5 3 Douglas fir M 17 260 Fair 10-20 C3 328725.1 747140.7 4 Douglas fir M 30 800 Fair 20-40 C2 328725.9 747144.9 5 Douglas fir M 25 440 Fair 20-40 C2 328716.7 747143.9 6 Douglas fir M 24 380 Fair 20-40 C2 328723.1 747140.8 7 Sessile Sessile oak EM: early-

mature 20 650 Fair >40 C2 328721.0 747138.0

8 Douglas fir EM 25 530 Good >40 C2 328722.4 747141.9 9 Sessile oak SM: semi-

mature 19 380 Fair >40 C2 328716.8 747141.7

10 Sessile oak SM 18 330 Good >40 C2 328713.8 747139.7 11 Douglas fir EM 20 420 Fair >40 C2 328712.5 747134.7 12 Douglas fir Y: young 8 380 Poor <5 U 328714.1 747130.6 13 Douglas fir Y 8 210 Dead <5 U 328707.2 747126.7 14 Beech (Fagus sylvatica) EM 18 600 Poor 20-40 C2 328711.2 747136.1 15 Douglas fir Y 19 310 Fair >40 C2 328705.2 747131.0 16 Douglas fir SM 26 390 Fair >40 C2 328733.8 747104.1 17 Sycamore (Acer

pseudoplatanus) EM 15 770 Fair >40 C2 328709.8 747128.1

18 Douglas fir SM 8 180 Poor <5 U 328707.0 747125.8 19 Douglas fir Y 11 270 Poor <5 U 328703.2 747127.4 20 Sessile oak SM 23 610 Good >40 C2 328701.7 747131.9 21 Douglas fir SM 20 430 Fair >40 C2 328697.3 747123.4 22 Douglas fir SM 19 410 Fair >40 B2 328698.7 747117.4 23 Douglas fir Y 8 210 Poor <5 U 328694.2 747123.9

Page 17: Tree Survey Report to BS5837:2012 › media › 3620 › ea... · 2019-11-11 · pruning of branches on one tree in Area C. Baseline Factors . 4.4. The site falls within the jurisdiction

ID To Fell Species Age Tree Height (m)

DBH (mm)

Condition Estimated Life Expectancy (years)

BS5837 Category

Easting Northing

24 Sessile oak EM 19 770 Fair >40 B2 328693.2 747129.2 25 Sessile oak SM 15 360 Poor >40 B2 328686.3 747120.5 26 Douglas fir Y 20 250 Fair >40 B2 328694.2 747123.8 27 Douglas fir EM 14 330 Poor 20-40 B2 328693.4 747117.8 28 Douglas fir EM 15 310 Poor 20-40 B2 328688.6 747113.8 29 Douglas fir SM 19 360 Fair >40 B2 328684.6 747116.1 30 Sessile oak SM 19 520 Good >40 B2 328687.7 747127.1 31 Sessile oak EM 18 530 Fair >40 B2 328678.7 747120.4 32 Douglas fir EM 21 450 Good >40 B2 328682.7 747117.8 33 Douglas fir SM 5 200 Poor <5 U 328682.8 747112.2 34 Sessile oak EM 22 670 Fair 20-40 B2 328689.2 747110.3 35 Sessile oak EM 19 530 Fair >40 B2 328676.1 747114.7 36 Douglas fir SM 15 370 Poor 10-20 C2 328674.3 747112.1 37 Douglas fir SM 21 370 Fair 20-40 B2 328679.1 747108.3 38 Douglas fir M 16 330 Poor 20-40 B2 328686.9 747111.9 39 Douglas fir EM 21 570 Good >40 B2 328678.4 747110.6 40 Sessile oak Y 6 220 Poor <5 U 328675.3 747114.5 41 Douglas fir Y 11 260 Good >40 B2 328671.7 747107.2 42 Douglas fir Y 11 220 Fair 20-40 B2 328670.6 747106.8 43 Douglas fir SM 16 300 Poor 20-40 B2 328682.5 747104.3 44 Douglas fir EM 21 580 Fair 20-40 B2 328678.2 747104.6 45 Douglas fir SM 25 480 Good 20-40 B2 328675.2 747109.3 46 Sessile oak EM 18 870 Good >40 B2 328668.3 747113.9 47 Douglas fir SM 18 350 Good 20-40 B2 328669.8 747110.7 48 Douglas fir SM 19 400 Fair >40 B2 328676.0 747105.0 49 Sessile oak EM 19 690 Fair >40 B2 328671.2 747104.8

Page 18: Tree Survey Report to BS5837:2012 › media › 3620 › ea... · 2019-11-11 · pruning of branches on one tree in Area C. Baseline Factors . 4.4. The site falls within the jurisdiction

ID To Fell Species Age Tree Height (m)

DBH (mm)

Condition Estimated Life Expectancy (years)

BS5837 Category

Easting Northing

50 Sycamore EM 20 350 Fair 20-40 B2 328674.4 747102.7 51 Sycamore EM 20 370 Fair 20-40 B2 328669.8 747099.6 52 Douglas fir SM 18 310 Fair 20-40 B2 328664.4 747097.4 53 Sessile oak EM 18 680 Good >40 B2 328661.8 747102.2 54 Sessile oak EM 19 560 Fair >40 B2 328662.0 747111.5 55 Sessile oak EM 18 460 Good >40 B2 328659.6 747099.0 56 Sessile oak M 19 660 Fair >40 B2 328622.2 747120.2 57 Sessile oak Y 11 160 Fair >40 B2 328659.8 747098.6 58 Douglas fir EM 20 550 Good >40 B2 328657.6 747096.4 59 Douglas fir EM 22 740 Good 20-40 B2 328652.8 747099.4 60 Sessile oak EM 15 530 Good >40 B2 328650.1 747099.5 61 Sycamore EM 17 630 Fair 20-40 B2 328645.8 747093.6 62 Douglas fir M 23 480 Good >40 B2 328684.1 747195.9 63 Sessile oak SM 10 320 Fair 20-40 B2 328653.7 747091.8 64 Sessile oak SM 14 350 Fair 20-40 B2 328656.2 747091.6 65 Sycamore EM 17 610 Fair 20-40 B2 328653.3 747091.7 66 Douglas fir EM 22 750 Good 20-40 B2 328646.8 747088.1 67 Sessile oak Y 11 270 Good >40 B2 328642.6 747094.6 68 Sessile oak SM 6 480 Poor 10-20 B2 328636.7 747094.7 69 Douglas fir EM 20 330 Good 20-40 B2 328636.8 747087.6 70 Douglas fir SM 11 230 Poor <5 U 328641.5 747088.9 71 Sessile oak EM 11 430 Poor 10-20 B2 328648.3 747088.2 72 Douglas fir SM 13 290 Poor 5-10 C2 328642.9 747082.2 73 Douglas fir EM 20 520 Good >40 B2 328638.5 747086.1 74 Douglas fir EM 19 630 Fair 20-40 B2 328637.8 747094.1 75 Sessile oak SM 13 490 Poor 10-20 C2 328637.2 747091.0

Page 19: Tree Survey Report to BS5837:2012 › media › 3620 › ea... · 2019-11-11 · pruning of branches on one tree in Area C. Baseline Factors . 4.4. The site falls within the jurisdiction

ID To Fell Species Age Tree Height (m)

DBH (mm)

Condition Estimated Life Expectancy (years)

BS5837 Category

Easting Northing

76 Douglas fir EM 20 440 Good 20-40 B2 328634.4 747086.5 77 Douglas fir SM 12 240 Poor 10-20 C2 328632.8 747085.8 78 Douglas fir EM 15 330 Good 20-40 B2 328637.6 747084.9 79 Sessile oak EM 15 380 Fair >40 B2 328639.3 747081.0 80 Sessile oak EM 17 320 Fair >40 B2 328640.1 747078.9 81 Douglas fir EM 23 500 Fair 20-40 B2 328638.2 747077.7 82 Beech SM 15 220 Good >40 B2 328635.6 747081.4 83 Sessile oak Y 11 160 Good >40 B2 328634.4 747085.2 84 Sycamore EM 13 380 Fair >40 B2 328629.3 747093.0 85 Douglas fir SM 9 210 Poor 10-20 C2 328629.5 747088.2 86 Douglas fir EM 20 550 Good 20-40 B2 328629.6 747080.7 87 Douglas fir SM 11 21 Dead <5 U 328627.7 747079.5 88 Douglas fir EM 20 390 Good 20-40 B2 328634.2 747084.0 89 Sessile oak EM 15 280 Fair >40 B2 328633.4 747082.8 90 Ash (Fraxinus excelsior) EM 15 380 Fair 20-40 B2 328629.2 747076.3 91 Douglas fir EM 19 290 Fair 10-20 C2 328634.7 747077.9 92 Douglas fir EM 20 440 Good 20-40 B2 328629.7 747075.7 93 Sessile oak EM 18 780 Good >40 B2 328625.5 747083.3 94 Douglas fir SM 11 220 Dead <5 U 328624.2 747081.0 95 Douglas fir EM 19 350 Fair 20-40 B2 328618.5 747079.4 96 Douglas fir SM 15 230 Poor <5 U 328617.6 747074.2 97 Douglas fir SM 15 220 Poor 10-20 C2 328619.2 747073.4 98 Sessile oak EM 16 230 Fair >40 B2 328618.6 747069.2 99 Sessile oak M 17 790 Fair 20-40 B2 328624.9 747072.2 100 Douglas fir EM 24 580 Good 20-40 B2 328619.0 747068.9 101 Douglas fir EM 20 510 Good 20-40 B2 328613.1 747074.4

Page 20: Tree Survey Report to BS5837:2012 › media › 3620 › ea... · 2019-11-11 · pruning of branches on one tree in Area C. Baseline Factors . 4.4. The site falls within the jurisdiction

ID To Fell Species Age Tree Height (m)

DBH (mm)

Condition Estimated Life Expectancy (years)

BS5837 Category

Easting Northing

102 Douglas fir SM 17 240 Good 20-40 B2 328612.9 747077.4 103 Sessile oak EM 17 470 Fair 20-40 B2 328611.3 747071.2 104 Sessile oak EM 18 670 Good >40 B2 328610.8 747066.0 105 Sessile oak EM 18 510 Fair >40 B2 328607.4 747063.9 106 Douglas fir EM 15 3390 Fair 20-40 B2 328607.9 747067.4 107 Scots pine (Pinus

sylvestris) EM 15 270 Fair >40 B2 328609.6 747073.6

108 Ash EM 12 400 Dead <5 U 328604.9 747072.5 109 Sessile oak EM 16 630 Fair 20-40 B2 328604.0 747067.5 110 Douglas fir SM 12 280 Poor 10-20 C2 328603.4 747064.7 111 Douglas fir Y 12 190 Poor 5-10 C2 328597.2 747068.2 112 Douglas fir EM 18 420 Fair 20-40 B2 328605.7 747064.0 113 Sessile oak EM 23 540 Fair >40 B2 328601.4 747060.2 114 Sessile oak EM 20 360 Good >40 B2 328597.5 747061.5 115 Douglas fir EM 21 480 Good 20-40 B2 328595.2 747059.2 116 Sessile oak EM 19 890 Good >40 B2 328595.3 747063.9 117 Douglas fir EM 18 240 Good 20-40 B2 328593.8 747057.2 118 Sessile oak EM 19 350 Good >40 B2 328593.9 747057.3 119 Douglas fir EM 20 470 Good 20-40 B2 328592.6 747059.6 120 Sessile oak EM 15 800 Poor 5-10 C2 328585.1 747061.4 121 Douglas fir EM 20 350 Good 20-40 B2 328586.8 747053.7 122 Douglas fir EM 19 300 Fair 10-20 B2 328589.1 747044.8 123 Sessile oak EM 18 330 Fair >40 B2 328585.2 747051.9 124 Douglas fir EM 19 250 Fair 20-40 B2 328582.7 747055.3 125 Douglas fir EM 10 180 Dead <5 U 328577.2 747051.1 126 Sessile oak EM 18 570 Fair >40 B2 328578.1 747056.5

Page 21: Tree Survey Report to BS5837:2012 › media › 3620 › ea... · 2019-11-11 · pruning of branches on one tree in Area C. Baseline Factors . 4.4. The site falls within the jurisdiction

ID To Fell Species Age Tree Height (m)

DBH (mm)

Condition Estimated Life Expectancy (years)

BS5837 Category

Easting Northing

127 Douglas fir EM 20 240 Fair 20-40 B2 328577.4 747054.4 128 Sessile oak EM 17 450 Fair >40 B2 328580.6 747054.9 129 Douglas fir EM 20 320 Good >40 B2 328579.8 747050.0 130 Sessile oak EM 18 460 Good >40 B2 328576.1 747047.6 131 Sessile oak EM 20 620 Fair >40 B2 328579.7 747045.5 132 Douglas fir EM 18 350 Fair 20-40 B2 328571.4 747047.6 133 Sessile oak EM 18 450 Fair 20-40 B2 328567.8 747042.2 134 Sessile oak EM 18 650 Fair >40 B2 328569.7 747046.1 135 Douglas fir EM 15 240 Poor 5-10 C2 328566.4 747037.3 136 Sessile oak EM 19 400 Fair >40 B2 328570.6 747042.5 137 Douglas fir EM 23 590 Good 20-40 B2 328567.0 747039.6 138 Beech EM 18 870 Fair 20-40 B2 328565.2 747045.9 139 Sessile oak M 18 630 Poor 20-40 C2 328560.3 746997.8 140 Sessile oak EM 16 380 Fair >40 B2 328548.4 746973.1 141 Douglas fir EM 17 310 Fair 20-40 B2 328556.4 747033.0 142 Sessile oak EM 15 250 Fair >40 B2 328554.0 747033.0 143 Douglas fir EM 14 320 Poor <5 U 328550.3 747036.1 144 Douglas fir EM 20 430 Good 20-40 B2 328553.5 747038.6 145 Douglas fir EM 12 200 Poor 5-10 C2 328551.9 747034.9 146 Douglas fir EM 20 410 Good >40 B2 328557.5 747033.4 147 Douglas fir EM 10 290 Poor 5-10 C2 328558.6 747032.7 148 Sycamore EM 19 290 Fair 20-40 B2 328559.8 747032.6 149 Sycamore EM 19 430 Fair >40 B2 328560.0 747031.7 150 Sycamore EM 20 400 Fair >40 B2 328559.9 747033.3 151 Douglas fir EM 19 330 Fair 20-40 B2 328558.2 747030.3 152 Douglas fir EM 18 400 Poor 10-20 C2 328554.4 747030.9

Page 22: Tree Survey Report to BS5837:2012 › media › 3620 › ea... · 2019-11-11 · pruning of branches on one tree in Area C. Baseline Factors . 4.4. The site falls within the jurisdiction

ID To Fell Species Age Tree Height (m)

DBH (mm)

Condition Estimated Life Expectancy (years)

BS5837 Category

Easting Northing

153 Douglas fir EM 18 330 Fair 20-40 B2 328547.6 747027.8 154 Douglas fir EM 20 490 Fair 20-40 B2 328545.9 747023.1 155 Sessile oak EM 18 570 Fair >40 B2 328547.8 747021.8 156 Sessile oak EM 21 500 Good >40 B2 328544.9 747024.9 157 Douglas fir EM 20 330 Good 20-40 B2 328541.3 747024.2 158 Douglas fir EM 17 40 Poor 10-20 C2 328543.2 747034.8 159 Sycamore EM 20 550 Fair >40 B2 328538.9 747032.6 160 Douglas fir EM 16 320 Fair 20-40 B2 328536.8 747030.6 161 Scots pine M 20 560 Fair >40 B2 328540.6 747026.3 162 Sycamore M 20 660 Fair 20-40 B2 328539.1 747020.8 163 Sessile oak M 21 100 Good >40 B2 328536.5 747026.1 164 Douglas fir Y 6 220 Poor 5-10 C2 328532.7 747026.3 165 Sessile oak SM 18 390 Fair >40 B2 328527.2 747023.5 166 Douglas fir M 25 640 Good 20-40 B2 328523.0 747019.2 167 Douglas fir SM 20 380 Fair 20-40 B2 328530.4 747018.5 168 Sessile oak EM 18 280 Fair >40 B2 328530.7 747017.4 169 Sessile oak SM 13 240 Fair >40 B2 328528.4 747018.1 170 Sessile oak EM 19 460 Fair >40 B2 328528.5 747014.3 171 Douglas fir EM 21 490 Fair 20-40 B2 328527.1 747011.6 172 Douglas fir EM 15 220 Poor 10-20 C2 328523.2 747010.5 173 Fell Douglas fir EM 18 30 Fair 20-40 B2 328526.4 747008.5 174 Fell Sessile oak EM 15 360 Fair >40 B2 328523.0 747008.1 175 Douglas fir M 23 690 Good 20-40 B2 328519.8 747011.6 176 Sessile oak EM 19 340 Good >40 B2 328520.9 747014.3 177 Sessile oak EM 19 430 Good 20-40 B2 328522.6 747020.5 178 Ash EM 20 500 Fair 20-40 B2 328517.7 747019.2

Page 23: Tree Survey Report to BS5837:2012 › media › 3620 › ea... · 2019-11-11 · pruning of branches on one tree in Area C. Baseline Factors . 4.4. The site falls within the jurisdiction

ID To Fell Species Age Tree Height (m)

DBH (mm)

Condition Estimated Life Expectancy (years)

BS5837 Category

Easting Northing

179 Sessile oak SM 11 190 Poor 10-20 C2 328519.6 747016.8 180 Sessile oak SM 15 420 Poor 10-20 C2 328515.9 747015.9 181 Sycamore EM 15 240 Fair 20-40 B2 328512.7 747018.4 182 Sycamore EM 17 260 Fair 20-40 B2 328514.0 747018.9 183 Fell Sessile oak EM 20 470 Fair >40 B2 328508.2 747011.0 184 Fell Douglas fir EM 20 370 Good 20-40 B2 328507.0 747008.2 185 Fell Douglas fir EM 20 470 Good 20-40 B2 328506.9 747007.3 186 Fell Sessile oak M 13 600 Poor 10-20 C2 328504.2 747008.5 187 Fell Sessile oak EM 20 520 Good >40 B2 328512.1 747006.1 188 Fell Douglas fir SM 24 380 Good 20-40 B2 328516.6 747002.9 189 Fell Douglas fir M 24 550 Good 20-40 B2 328515.1 747002.9 190 Fell Sycamore EM 18 470 Fair 20-40 B2 328513.4 746996.5 191 Fell Sycamore EM 19 510 Fair 20-40 B2 328514.0 746996.1 192 Fell Sycamore EM 19 380 Fair 20-40 B2 328513.6 746994.4 193 Fell Beech M 18 710 Fair 10-20 C2 328509.3 747000.6 194 Fell Sessile oak M 19 580 Good >40 B2 328505.6 747001.7 195 Fell Douglas fir EM 17 230 Fair 10-20 C2 328499.6 747002.9 196 Fell Sycamore EM 14 300 Fair 20-40 B2 328500.3 747005.0 197 Fell Sessile oak EM 17 330 Fair 20-40 B2 328493.4 747003.7 198 Fell Sycamore EM 18 320 Fair 20-40 C2 328495.7 747003.2 199 Fell Sessile oak EM 18 450 Good >40 B2 328498.0 747001.4 200 Fell Douglas fir EM 19 360 Good 20-40 B2 328500.1 746997.9 201 Fell Douglas fir EM 21 300 Fair 20-40 B2 328502.2 746998.6 202 Fell Sessile oak M 20 620 Good >40 B2 328503.3 746995.9 203 Fell Douglas fir EM 21 280 Poor 10-20 C2 328500.1 746994.5 204 Beech EM 19 42 Fair >40 B2 328499.0 746986.6

Page 24: Tree Survey Report to BS5837:2012 › media › 3620 › ea... · 2019-11-11 · pruning of branches on one tree in Area C. Baseline Factors . 4.4. The site falls within the jurisdiction

ID To Fell Species Age Tree Height (m)

DBH (mm)

Condition Estimated Life Expectancy (years)

BS5837 Category

Easting Northing

205 Sessile oak SM 19 480 Fair >40 B2 328500.4 746990.5 206 Douglas fir EM 18 270 Good 20-40 B2 328493.7 746987.3 207 Sessile oak M 19 680 Good >40 B2 328490.8 746992.2 208 Sessile oak M 21 740 Good >40 B2 328489.1 746991.1 209 Douglas fir EM 12 280 Poor 5-10 U 328487.8 746994.8 210 Fell Douglas fir EM 10 250 Poor 10-20 C2 328487.4 746999.2 211 Fell Sycamore EM 16 320 Good 20-40 B2 328492.6 747000.8 212 Fell Sessile oak EM 20 590 Good >40 B2 328480.9 746997.0 213 Douglas fir EM 19 260 Fair 20-40 B2 328482.5 746996.5 214 Douglas fir EM 19 460 Fair 20-40 B2 328481.5 746991.5 215 Douglas fir EM 20 460 Good 20-40 B2 328481.7 746990.6 216 Beech M 16 880 Poor 10-20 C2 328475.2 746990.2 217 Sessile oak M 19 500 Good >40 B2 328477.0 746989.1 218 Douglas fir EM 18 260 Fair 20-40 B2 328479.5 746987.5 219 Sessile oak EM 16 400 Poor 20-40 C2 328485.0 746982.1 220 Douglas fir EM 21 480 Good 20-40 B2 328486.8 746980.1 221 Douglas fir Y 7 220 Poor 5-10 U 328490.6 746982.9 222 Sessile oak EM 18 280 Good >40 B2 328491.5 746984.5 223 Douglas fir EM 17 220 Poor 10-20 C2 328490.9 746977.8 224 Sessile oak EM 18 220 Fair >40 B2 328496.1 746981.1 225 Sessile oak M 20 490 Good >40 B2 328496.6 746985.2 226 Douglas fir SM 15 220 Poor <5 U 328497.0 746984.2 227 Sessile oak EM 6 200 Poor <5 U 328499.1 746993.3 228 Sycamore EM 18 390 Fair 20-40 B2 328509.4 746984.8 229 Sycamore EM 18 500 Fair 20-40 B2 328512.9 746986.2 230 Sessile oak M 20 450 Good >40 B2 328505.4 746980.5

Page 25: Tree Survey Report to BS5837:2012 › media › 3620 › ea... · 2019-11-11 · pruning of branches on one tree in Area C. Baseline Factors . 4.4. The site falls within the jurisdiction

ID To Fell Species Age Tree Height (m)

DBH (mm)

Condition Estimated Life Expectancy (years)

BS5837 Category

Easting Northing

231 Douglas fir EM 20 450 Fair 20-40 B2 328503.6 746973.7 232 Cherry, Bird (Prunus

padus) EM 17 260 Fair 20-40 B2 328503.7 746974.8

233 Douglas fir EM 17 330 Fair 20-40 B2 328499.2 746979.4 234 Douglas fir EM 19 440 Fair 20-40 B2 328499.4 746981.5 235 Sessile oak EM 18 350 Fair >40 B2 328493.5 746973.7 236 Sessile oak EM 17 340 Fair >40 B2 328489.1 746975.0 237 Elm sp. (Ulmus sp.) EM 17 330 Poor 20-40 B2 328488.1 746973.8 238 Ash EM 17 330 Fair 20-40 B2 328482.6 746971.7 239 Ash EM 17 350 Fair 20-40 B2 328486.2 746974.7 240 Sessile oak EM 16 190 Fair >40 B2 328489.2 746970.0 241 Scots pine M 17 510 Fair 10-20 C2 328491.9 746969.6 242 Sessile oak M 18 260 Fair >40 B2 328492.9 746973.7 243 Sessile oak M 20 300 Good >40 B2 328498.7 746974.0 244 Douglas fir M 20 270 Good 20-40 B2 328498.8 746973.7 245 Sessile oak M 16 240 Fair >40 B2 328500.7 746969.2 246 Douglas fir M 21 430 Good 20-40 B2 328502.2 746971.1 247 Beech M 18 810 Good >40 B2 328497.3 746965.5 248 Sycamore EM 16 410 Fair >40 C2 328575.1 747058.0 Area C 249 Ash EM 11 320 Poor 5-10 C2 328556.2 747050.4 250 Beech EM 14 500 Fair 20-40 C2 328543.8 747042.9 251 Beech EM 13 500 Fair 20-40 C2 328529.7 747032.4 252 Ash EM 15 480 Fair 20-40 C2 328513.0 747026.1 253 Sycamore EM 18 480 Good >40 C2 328470.7 746996.0 Area B

Page 26: Tree Survey Report to BS5837:2012 › media › 3620 › ea... · 2019-11-11 · pruning of branches on one tree in Area C. Baseline Factors . 4.4. The site falls within the jurisdiction

ID To Fell Species Age Tree Height (m)

DBH (mm)

Condition Estimated Life Expectancy (years)

BS5837 Category

Easting Northing

256 Elm EM 18 320 Fair 20-40 B2 257 Elm EM 18 320 Fair 20-40 B2 258 Scots pine EM 15 270 Fair 20-40 B2 259 Scots pine EM 15 270 Fair 20-40 B2 260 Scots pine EM 15 270 Fair 20-40 B2 261 Scots pine EM 15 270 Fair 20-40 B2 262 Scots pine EM 15 270 Fair 20-40 B2 263 Scots pine EM 15 270 Fair 20-40 B2 264 Scots pine EM 15 270 Fair 20-40 B2 265 Scots pine EM 15 270 Fair 20-40 B2 266 Scots pine EM 15 270 Fair 20-40 B2 267 Douglas fir EM 25 350 Fair 20-40 B2 268 Douglas fir EM 25 350 Fair 20-40 B2 269 Douglas fir EM 25 350 Fair 20-40 B2 270 Douglas fir EM 25 350 Fair 20-40 B2 271 Douglas fir EM 25 350 Fair 20-40 B2 272 Douglas fir EM 25 350 Fair 20-40 B2 273 Douglas fir EM 25 350 Fair 20-40 B2 274 Douglas fir EM 25 350 Fair 20-40 B2 275 Douglas fir EM 25 350 Fair 20-40 B2 276 Douglas fir EM 25 350 Fair 20-40 B2 277 Douglas fir EM 25 350 Fair 20-40 B2 278 Douglas fir EM 25 350 Fair 20-40 B2 279 Douglas fir EM 25 350 Fair 20-40 B2 280 Douglas fir EM 25 350 Fair 20-40 B2 281 Douglas fir EM 25 350 Fair 20-40 B2

Page 27: Tree Survey Report to BS5837:2012 › media › 3620 › ea... · 2019-11-11 · pruning of branches on one tree in Area C. Baseline Factors . 4.4. The site falls within the jurisdiction

ID To Fell Species Age Tree Height (m)

DBH (mm)

Condition Estimated Life Expectancy (years)

BS5837 Category

Easting Northing

282 Douglas fir EM 25 350 Fair 20-40 B2 283 Douglas fir EM 25 350 Fair 20-40 B2 284 Douglas fir EM 25 350 Fair 20-40 B2 285 Douglas fir EM 25 350 Fair 20-40 B2 286 Douglas fir EM 25 350 Fair 20-40 B2 287 Douglas fir EM 25 350 Fair 20-40 B2 288 Douglas fir EM 25 350 Fair 20-40 B2 289 Douglas fir EM 25 350 Fair 20-40 B2 290 Douglas fir EM 25 350 Fair 20-40 B2 291 Douglas fir EM 25 350 Fair 20-40 B2 292 Douglas fir EM 25 350 Fair 20-40 B2 293 Douglas fir EM 25 350 Fair 20-40 B2 294 Douglas fir EM 25 350 Fair 20-40 B2 295 Douglas fir EM 25 350 Fair 20-40 B2 296 Douglas fir EM 25 350 Fair 20-40 B2 297 Douglas fir EM 25 350 Fair 20-40 B2 298 Douglas fir EM 25 350 Fair 20-40 B2 299 Douglas fir EM 25 350 Fair 20-40 B2 300 Douglas fir EM 25 350 Fair 20-40 B2 301 Douglas fir EM 25 350 Fair 20-40 B2 302 Douglas fir EM 25 350 Fair 20-40 B2 303 Sessile oak EM 18 220 Good 20-40 B2 304 Sessile oak EM 18 220 Good 20-40 B2 305 Sessile oak EM 18 220 Good 20-40 B2 306 Sessile oak EM 18 220 Good 20-40 B2 307 Sessile oak EM 18 220 Good 20-40 B2

Page 28: Tree Survey Report to BS5837:2012 › media › 3620 › ea... · 2019-11-11 · pruning of branches on one tree in Area C. Baseline Factors . 4.4. The site falls within the jurisdiction

ID To Fell Species Age Tree Height (m)

DBH (mm)

Condition Estimated Life Expectancy (years)

BS5837 Category

Easting Northing

308 Sessile oak EM 18 220 Good 20-40 B2 309 Sessile oak EM 18 220 Good 20-40 B2 310 Sessile oak EM 18 220 Good 20-40 B2 311 Sessile oak EM 18 220 Good 20-40 B2 312 Sessile oak EM 18 220 Good 20-40 B2 313 Sessile oak EM 18 220 Good 20-40 B2 314 Sessile oak EM 18 220 Good 20-40 B2 315 Sessile oak EM 18 220 Good 20-40 B2 316 Sessile oak EM 18 220 Good 20-40 B2 317 Sessile oak EM 18 220 Good 20-40 B2 318 Sessile oak EM 18 220 Good 20-40 B2 319 Sessile oak EM 18 220 Good 20-40 B2 320 Sessile oak EM 18 220 Good 20-40 B2 321 Sessile oak EM 18 220 Good 20-40 B2 322 Sessile oak EM 18 220 Good 20-40 B2 323 Sessile oak EM 18 220 Good 20-40 B2 324 Sessile oak EM 18 220 Good 20-40 B2 325 Sessile oak EM 18 220 Good 20-40 B2 326 Sessile oak EM 18 220 Good 20-40 B2 327 Sessile oak EM 18 220 Good 20-40 B2 328 Sessile oak EM 18 220 Good 20-40 B2 329 Sessile oak EM 18 220 Good 20-40 B2 330 Sessile oak EM 18 220 Good 20-40 B2 331 Sessile oak EM 18 220 Good 20-40 B2 332 Sessile oak EM 18 220 Good 20-40 B2 333 Sessile oak EM 18 220 Good 20-40 B2

Page 29: Tree Survey Report to BS5837:2012 › media › 3620 › ea... · 2019-11-11 · pruning of branches on one tree in Area C. Baseline Factors . 4.4. The site falls within the jurisdiction

ID To Fell Species Age Tree Height (m)

DBH (mm)

Condition Estimated Life Expectancy (years)

BS5837 Category

Easting Northing

334 Sessile oak EM 18 220 Good 20-40 B2 335 Sessile oak EM 18 220 Good 20-40 B2 336 Sessile oak EM 18 220 Good 20-40 B2 337 Sessile oak EM 18 220 Good 20-40 B2 338 Sessile oak EM 18 220 Good 20-40 B2 339 Sessile oak EM 18 220 Good 20-40 B2 340 Sessile oak EM 18 220 Good 20-40 B2 341 Sessile oak EM 18 220 Good 20-40 B2 342 Sessile oak EM 18 220 Good 20-40 B2 343 Sessile oak EM 18 220 Good 20-40 B2 344 Beech EM 16 550 Fair 20-40 B2 345 Beech EM 16 550 Fair 20-40 B2 346 Beech EM 16 550 Fair 20-40 B2 347 Beech EM 16 550 Fair 20-40 B2 348 Beech EM 16 550 Fair 20-40 B2 349 Beech EM 16 550 Fair 20-40 B2 350 Beech EM 16 550 Fair 20-40 B2 351 Beech EM 16 550 Fair 20-40 B2 352 Beech EM 16 550 Fair 20-40 B2 353 Beech EM 16 550 Fair 20-40 B2 354 Beech EM 16 550 Fair 20-40 B2 355 whitebeam (Sorbus aria) EM 15 320 Fair 20-40 B2 356 Sycamore EM 15 770 Good 20-40 B2 357 Sycamore EM 15 770 Good 20-40 B2 358 Sycamore EM 15 770 Good 20-40 B2 359 Sycamore EM 15 770 Good 20-40 B2

Page 30: Tree Survey Report to BS5837:2012 › media › 3620 › ea... · 2019-11-11 · pruning of branches on one tree in Area C. Baseline Factors . 4.4. The site falls within the jurisdiction

ID To Fell Species Age Tree Height (m)

DBH (mm)

Condition Estimated Life Expectancy (years)

BS5837 Category

Easting Northing

360 Sycamore EM 15 770 Good 20-40 B2 361 Sycamore EM 15 770 Good 20-40 B2 362 Sycamore EM 15 770 Good 20-40 B2 363 Sycamore EM 15 770 Good 20-40 B2 364 Sycamore EM 15 770 Good 20-40 B2 365 Sycamore EM 15 770 Good 20-40 B2

Page 31: Tree Survey Report to BS5837:2012 › media › 3620 › ea... · 2019-11-11 · pruning of branches on one tree in Area C. Baseline Factors . 4.4. The site falls within the jurisdiction

Appendix C

Tree survey plans with Root Protection Area

Overview Plan and Sheets 1 to 5 with access detail

Page 32: Tree Survey Report to BS5837:2012 › media › 3620 › ea... · 2019-11-11 · pruning of branches on one tree in Area C. Baseline Factors . 4.4. The site falls within the jurisdiction

41

41

41

41

41

40164C

165B166B

167B168B

169B170B171B

172C

173B

174B

175B

176B

177B

178B179C

180C

181B 182B

183B184B185B

186C

187B

188B189B

190B191B192B

193C

194B

195C

196B

197B 198C199B

200B 201B202B

203C

204B

205B206B

207B208B

209U

210C 211B

212B 213B

214B215B

216C 217B218B

219C220B

221U222B

223C224B

225B226U

227U

228B 229B230B

231B232B

233B

234B

235B

236B237B238B

239B

240B 241C

242B243B244B

245B246B

247B

252C253C

±

Drawing NoDate

Alyth

1:260Scale:

Contains Ordnance Survey Open Data © Crown Copyright andDatabase Right 2019.

Neil_McKay_Rev6.017 September 2019

[email protected]

James England NDF, BSc(Hons)For, MicForGIS - Forestry - Arboriculture - Website Design

Tree Survey

@ A3 Scale

2 3 51 4

Contains OS data © CrownCopyright and database right2019

N e i l M c K a yN e i l M c K a yForestry Consultant Ltd

Grange FarmTundergarthLockerbie

DG11 2QG

Page 1 of 5

Map No: 1

Rotated 327 degrees

User
Rectangle
Page 33: Tree Survey Report to BS5837:2012 › media › 3620 › ea... · 2019-11-11 · pruning of branches on one tree in Area C. Baseline Factors . 4.4. The site falls within the jurisdiction

41

41

42

111

114115B

116B

117B118B

119B

120C

121B122B123B

124B125U

126B127B 128B

129B130B

131B

132B133B

134B

135C

136B137B

138B139C140B

141B

142B

143U144B

145C

146B147C 148B149B

150B151B

152C153B

154B155B

156B

157B

158C159B160B

161B

162B

163B

164C165B166B

167B168B

169B170B171B

172C

173B

174B

175B

176B

177B

178B179C

180C

181B 182B

183B184B185B

186C

187B

188B189B

190B191B192B

193C

194B

195C

196B

197B 198C199B

200B 201B202B

203C

204B

205B206B

207B208B

209U

210C 211B

C220B

221U222B

223C224B

225B226U

227U

228B 229B230B

231B232B

233B

234B

235B

236B237B

239B

240BC

242B243B244B

B246B

248C249C250C

251C252C

±

Drawing NoDate

Alyth

1:260Scale:

Contains Ordnance Survey Open Data © Crown Copyright andDatabase Right 2019.

Neil_McKay_Rev6.017 September 2019

[email protected]

James England NDF, BSc(Hons)For, MicForGIS - Forestry - Arboriculture - Website Design

Tree Survey

@ A3 Scale

2 3 51 4

Contains OS data © CrownCopyright and database right2019

N e i l M c K a yN e i l M c K a yForestry Consultant Ltd

Grange FarmTundergarthLockerbie

DG11 2QG

Page 2 of 5

Map No: 2

Rotated 327 degrees

User
Rectangle
Page 34: Tree Survey Report to BS5837:2012 › media › 3620 › ea... · 2019-11-11 · pruning of branches on one tree in Area C. Baseline Factors . 4.4. The site falls within the jurisdiction

41

41

41

42

42

555658B

59B

60B61B 62B

63B 64B

65B66B

67B

68B

69B 70U

71B72C

73B

74B75C

76B77C

78B

79B80B81B

82B

83B

84B

85C

86B87U88B89B

90B 91C92B

93B94U

95B

96U 97C

98B 99B100B

101B

102B

103B

104B105B

106B

107B

108U

109B110C

111C

112B113B

114B115B

116B

117B118B

119B

120C

121B122B123B

124B125U

126B127B 128B

129B130B

131B

132B133B

134B

135C

136B137B

138B139C140B

141B

142B

143U144B

145C

146B147C 148B149B

150B151B

152CB

B

248C249C

±

Drawing NoDate

Alyth

1:260Scale:

Contains Ordnance Survey Open Data © Crown Copyright andDatabase Right 2019.

Neil_McKay_Rev6.017 September 2019

[email protected]

James England NDF, BSc(Hons)For, MicForGIS - Forestry - Arboriculture - Website Design

Tree Survey

@ A3 Scale

2 3 51 4

Contains OS data © CrownCopyright and database right2019

N e i l M c K a yN e i l M c K a yForestry Consultant Ltd

Grange FarmTundergarthLockerbie

DG11 2QG

Page 3 of 5

Map No: 3

Rotated 327 degrees

User
Rectangle
Page 35: Tree Survey Report to BS5837:2012 › media › 3620 › ea... · 2019-11-11 · pruning of branches on one tree in Area C. Baseline Factors . 4.4. The site falls within the jurisdiction

41

41

41

42

42

42

5C

7C

9C10C

11C

12U13U

14C15C16C

17C18U

19U

20C

21C

22B

23U

24B

25B 26B

27B28B

29B

30B31B

32B

33U

34B

35B36C

37B 38B

39B

40U

41B42B

43B

44B

45B

46B

47B

48B

49B

50B51B52B

53B

54B

55B56B57B58B

59B

60B61B 62B

63B 64B

65B66B

67B

68B

69B 70U

71B72C

73B

74B75C

76B77C

78B

79B80B81B

82B

83B

84B

85C

86B87U88B89B

90B 91C92B

93B94U

95B

96U 97C

98B 99B100B

101B

102B

103B

104B

B

±

Drawing NoDate

Alyth

1:260Scale:

Contains Ordnance Survey Open Data © Crown Copyright andDatabase Right 2019.

Neil_McKay_Rev6.017 September 2019

[email protected]

James England NDF, BSc(Hons)For, MicForGIS - Forestry - Arboriculture - Website Design

Tree Survey

@ A3 Scale

2 3 51 4

Contains OS data © CrownCopyright and database right2019

N e i l M c K a yN e i l M c K a yForestry Consultant Ltd

Grange FarmTundergarthLockerbie

DG11 2QG

Page 4 of 5

Map No: 4

Rotated 327 degrees

User
Rectangle
Page 36: Tree Survey Report to BS5837:2012 › media › 3620 › ea... · 2019-11-11 · pruning of branches on one tree in Area C. Baseline Factors . 4.4. The site falls within the jurisdiction

4141

42

42

42

1U

2U

3C

4C

5C

6C7C

8C

9C10C

11C

12U13U

14C15C16C

17C18U

19U

20C

21C

22B

23U

24B

25B 26B

27B28B

29B

30B31B

32B

33U

34B

35B36C

37B 38B

39B

40U

B

43B

44B

45B

48B50B

±

Drawing NoDate

Alyth

1:260Scale:

Contains Ordnance Survey Open Data © Crown Copyright andDatabase Right 2019.

Neil_McKay_Rev6.017 September 2019

[email protected]

James England NDF, BSc(Hons)For, MicForGIS - Forestry - Arboriculture - Website Design

Tree Survey

@ A3 Scale

2 3 51 4

Contains OS data © CrownCopyright and database right2019

N e i l M c K a yN e i l M c K a yForestry Consultant Ltd

Grange FarmTundergarthLockerbie

DG11 2QG

Page 5 of 5

Map No: 5

Rotated 327 degrees

User
Rectangle
Page 37: Tree Survey Report to BS5837:2012 › media › 3620 › ea... · 2019-11-11 · pruning of branches on one tree in Area C. Baseline Factors . 4.4. The site falls within the jurisdiction

41

4141

41

153

154B 155

156B157B

160

161B

162B

163B164C

165B

166B 167B168B169B

170B171B172C

173B174B

175B

176B

177B178B179C180C

181B182B

183B184B185B

186C187B

188B189B

190B191B192B

193C194B

195C

196B197B 198C199B

200B201B

202B203C

204B

205B

206B

207B208B

209U

210C

211B

212B 213B

214B215B216C 217B218B

219C220B

221U222B

223C

224B

225B226U

227U

228B229B

230B

231B232B

233B

234B

235B236B237B

238B

239B

240B 241C

242B243B244B

245B

246B

247B

253C

±

Drawing NoDate

Alyth

1:265Scale:

Contains Ordnance Survey Open Data © Crown Copyright andDatabase Right 2019.

Neil_McKay_Rev6.017 September 2019

[email protected]

James England NDF, BSc(Hons)For, MicForGIS - Forestry - Arboriculture - Website Design

Tree Survey

@ A3 Scale

Contains OS data © CrownCopyright and database right2019

N e i l M c K a yN e i l M c K a yForestry Consultant Ltd

Grange FarmTundergarthLockerbie

DG11 2QG

Page of

Map No:

530m2

User
Rectangle
Page 38: Tree Survey Report to BS5837:2012 › media › 3620 › ea... · 2019-11-11 · pruning of branches on one tree in Area C. Baseline Factors . 4.4. The site falls within the jurisdiction

Appendix D

Terms Used In Schedule

Page 39: Tree Survey Report to BS5837:2012 › media › 3620 › ea... · 2019-11-11 · pruning of branches on one tree in Area C. Baseline Factors . 4.4. The site falls within the jurisdiction

Tree survey BS 5837:2012 4.4.2.5 1 Tree reference number: identification number as cross referenced with the Tree Survey plan. 2 Species: trees have been given their common and botanical name where specifically known. 3 Height: estimated rather than measured. 4 Stem diameter at breast height (dbh): calculated by measuring the circumference at a height of 1.5m from ground level to determine the diameter. 5 Branch spread: the circles indicated on the Tree Survey Plan are a representation of the overall spread of the crown. 6 Height of crown clearance: given in metres above adjacent ground level. (not shown) 7 Age class: young (YNG) up to 10 years, semi-mature (SM) 1/3 life expectancy, early mature (EM) 2/3 life expectancy, mature (M) over 2/3 life expectancy, over mature (OM) declining/moribund, veteran (V) exceptionally old tree at the end of its life. 8 Condition & Comments: the overall physiological and structural condition: good (G) sound tree needing little or no attention, fair (F) minor but rectifiable defects, poor (P) major structural and/or physiological defects that would be inappropriate to retain and/or expensive, dead (D) no longer alive or those dying and unlikely to recover. 9 Estimated remaining contribution: defined in years; less than 10, 10-20, 20-40, or over 40. 10 Category grading: trees have been given a grade to classify the quality of each tree based on the Condition Classes and subcategories given within BS 5837:2012 (see category grading below). 11 Root Protection Area: protective measures as per BS 5837:2012 section 4.6 which states that an area based on a radius equal to 12 times the stem diameter should be protected against damage to roots known as the “Root Protection Area” (RPA), given in m². A radius has also been given and shown around each tree stem on the Tree Survey Plan (Appendix C). Category grading for the assessment of tree quality (in accordance with Table 1 "Cascade chart for tree quality assessment" within BS 5837:2012) is described below: Category U: Trees unsuitable for retention - Those in such a condition that they cannot realistically be retained as living trees in the context of the current land use for longer than 10 years. Category A: Trees of high quality - With an estimated remaining life expectancy of at least 40 years. Category B: Trees of moderate quality - With an estimated remaining life expectancy of at least 20 years. Category C: Trees of low quality - With an estimated remaining life expectancy of at least 10 years, or young trees with a stem diameter below 150 mm. Subcategory grades for the assessment of tree quality (in accordance with Table 1 "Cascade chart for tree quality assessment" within BS 5837:2012) are described below: 1 Mainly arboricultural qualities - Trees that are a particularly good example of their species, especially if rare or unusual. 2 Mainly landscape qualities - Trees, groups or woodlands of particular visual importance as arboricultural and/or landscape features. 3 Mainly cultural values, including conservation - Trees, groups or woodlands of significant conservation, historical, commemorative or other value, such as veteran trees or wood-pasture.

Page 40: Tree Survey Report to BS5837:2012 › media › 3620 › ea... · 2019-11-11 · pruning of branches on one tree in Area C. Baseline Factors . 4.4. The site falls within the jurisdiction

Appendix E

Tree Protection Plan

In order to avoid disturbances to trees to be retained and to ensure their survival, it is essential to consider, make allowances for, and plan all construction operations which will be undertaken in the vicinity of the trees, in particular: a) Site construction access; b) The intensity and nature of the construction activity; c) Contractor’s car parking; d) Phasing of construction works; e) The space needed for all foundation excavations and construction works; f) The availability of special construction techniques; g) The location and space needed for all service runs including foul and surface water drains, land drains, soakways, gas, oil, water, electricity, telephone, television or other communication cables; h) All changes in ground level, including the location of retaining walls, steps and making adequate allowance for foundations of such walls and backfillings; i) Spaces for cranes, plant, scaffolding and access during works; j) Space for site huts, temporary latrines (including their drainage) and other temporary structures; k) The type and extent of landscape works which will be needed within the protected areas and the effects these will have on the root system; l) Space for storing (whether temporary or long-term) materials, spoil and fuel and the mixing of cement and concrete; m) The effects of slope on the movement of potentially harmful liquid spillages towards or into protected areas.

DEFAULT SPECIFICATION FOR PROTECTIVE BARRIER

Page 41: Tree Survey Report to BS5837:2012 › media › 3620 › ea... · 2019-11-11 · pruning of branches on one tree in Area C. Baseline Factors . 4.4. The site falls within the jurisdiction

Appendix F

Photographic Record

Page 42: Tree Survey Report to BS5837:2012 › media › 3620 › ea... · 2019-11-11 · pruning of branches on one tree in Area C. Baseline Factors . 4.4. The site falls within the jurisdiction

PHOTOGRAPH 1: OVERVIEW AREA A

Page 43: Tree Survey Report to BS5837:2012 › media › 3620 › ea... · 2019-11-11 · pruning of branches on one tree in Area C. Baseline Factors . 4.4. The site falls within the jurisdiction

PHOTOGRAPH 2: OVERVIEW AREA B

Page 44: Tree Survey Report to BS5837:2012 › media › 3620 › ea... · 2019-11-11 · pruning of branches on one tree in Area C. Baseline Factors . 4.4. The site falls within the jurisdiction

PHOTOGRAPH 3: AREA A ADJACENT TO PUBLIC ROAD

Page 45: Tree Survey Report to BS5837:2012 › media › 3620 › ea... · 2019-11-11 · pruning of branches on one tree in Area C. Baseline Factors . 4.4. The site falls within the jurisdiction

PHOTOGRAPH 4: ROADSIDE TREES OPPOSITE THE SHELTERBELT

Page 46: Tree Survey Report to BS5837:2012 › media › 3620 › ea... · 2019-11-11 · pruning of branches on one tree in Area C. Baseline Factors . 4.4. The site falls within the jurisdiction

PHOTOGRAPH 5: DEAD SCOTS PINE TREE PHOTOGRAPH 6: NATURAL REGENERATION