transphat ip radios glenn anderson traffic operations – system operations branch 2012 traffic...

43
TransPHAT IP Radios Glenn Anderson Traffic Operations – System Operations Branch 2012 Traffic Engineers Meeting

Upload: omari-beckley

Post on 30-Mar-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: TransPHAT IP Radios Glenn Anderson Traffic Operations – System Operations Branch 2012 Traffic Engineers Meeting

TransPHAT

IP RadiosGlenn Anderson

Traffic Operations – System Operations Branch2012 Traffic Engineers Meeting

Page 2: TransPHAT IP Radios Glenn Anderson Traffic Operations – System Operations Branch 2012 Traffic Engineers Meeting

TransSTAMP, what is it?

• A system to automatically monitor the performance of our roadways

– At this time we are focusing on arterials– Easier to deploy on interstates

Page 3: TransPHAT IP Radios Glenn Anderson Traffic Operations – System Operations Branch 2012 Traffic Engineers Meeting

Bluetooth

• Approx 10% of vehicles have Bluetooth “on”• Ubiquitous

Page 4: TransPHAT IP Radios Glenn Anderson Traffic Operations – System Operations Branch 2012 Traffic Engineers Meeting

TransSTAMP Concept of Operations

• A Bluetooth device constantly broadcasts its unique address (MAC) so that other devices can find it and pair with it.

• If you listen for passing devices you can match the address at downstream locations to determine the travel time.

Page 5: TransPHAT IP Radios Glenn Anderson Traffic Operations – System Operations Branch 2012 Traffic Engineers Meeting
Page 6: TransPHAT IP Radios Glenn Anderson Traffic Operations – System Operations Branch 2012 Traffic Engineers Meeting

Widely used

Page 7: TransPHAT IP Radios Glenn Anderson Traffic Operations – System Operations Branch 2012 Traffic Engineers Meeting
Page 8: TransPHAT IP Radios Glenn Anderson Traffic Operations – System Operations Branch 2012 Traffic Engineers Meeting

In-house solution

Page 9: TransPHAT IP Radios Glenn Anderson Traffic Operations – System Operations Branch 2012 Traffic Engineers Meeting

Why build in-house?• Integration with existing radios and routers– Remote communications to 1300 signals– Existing network can handle the data– Firewall problems previously worked through– No duplicate maintenance costs

• KYTC devices share existing signal network

• Initial reader cost– Commercial units - $5000– KYTC unit $200– Lower cost means we can install hundreds

Page 10: TransPHAT IP Radios Glenn Anderson Traffic Operations – System Operations Branch 2012 Traffic Engineers Meeting

• Contractual issues– Recurring charges• Preferred business model is a service (service = continuous cash flow)• Cellular charges (a router at every reader)

– $50/reader/month

• Data processing charges– $50/reader/month, more cash flow

– Sole Source?• Rebidding issues• Apples vs Oranges if you have multiple vendors

Page 11: TransPHAT IP Radios Glenn Anderson Traffic Operations – System Operations Branch 2012 Traffic Engineers Meeting

• GIS Integration– No national standards for roadway coding• County, Route, Milepoint

– KY milepoints start over at each county line

• Vendors forced into using least common denominator– Google maps– TIGER maps

– TransSTAMP uses the KYTC GIS layers• We leverage our existing GIS data• Segment speed limits• Linking to traffic signal layer

Page 12: TransPHAT IP Radios Glenn Anderson Traffic Operations – System Operations Branch 2012 Traffic Engineers Meeting

• Data ownership– KYTC owns our data and can distribute as we see fit

• Data timeliness– Readers are polled every 5 minutes– Select segments will be automatically processed

• Transparency in data processing– No “secret algorithms”– Performance measures that we define and understand• Still working on the PMs

Page 13: TransPHAT IP Radios Glenn Anderson Traffic Operations – System Operations Branch 2012 Traffic Engineers Meeting

Current Locations

75 TransSTAMP Readers:

Paducah, Murray, Hopkinsville, Elizabethtown, Bardstown, Boone Co, Kenton Co, Frankfort, Versailles, London

Page 14: TransPHAT IP Radios Glenn Anderson Traffic Operations – System Operations Branch 2012 Traffic Engineers Meeting

Radcliff & E-Town

Page 15: TransPHAT IP Radios Glenn Anderson Traffic Operations – System Operations Branch 2012 Traffic Engineers Meeting

8 mile segment, US 60 Versailles to Frankfort, easy peasy

Page 16: TransPHAT IP Radios Glenn Anderson Traffic Operations – System Operations Branch 2012 Traffic Engineers Meeting
Page 17: TransPHAT IP Radios Glenn Anderson Traffic Operations – System Operations Branch 2012 Traffic Engineers Meeting

1 mile segment, Frankfort, Chenault to US 421

Page 18: TransPHAT IP Radios Glenn Anderson Traffic Operations – System Operations Branch 2012 Traffic Engineers Meeting
Page 19: TransPHAT IP Radios Glenn Anderson Traffic Operations – System Operations Branch 2012 Traffic Engineers Meeting

Another source of error – detection raduis300’ range with no attenuationmore attenuation = more precision but fewer samples

Page 20: TransPHAT IP Radios Glenn Anderson Traffic Operations – System Operations Branch 2012 Traffic Engineers Meeting

85th percentile speeds:6:00 – 7:00 46.7 mph7:00 – 8:00 25.5 mph8:00 – 9:00 44.9 mph

1.4 mile segment, Kenton Co.KY 17 Tuscany to I 275

Page 21: TransPHAT IP Radios Glenn Anderson Traffic Operations – System Operations Branch 2012 Traffic Engineers Meeting

Single point data – no matching• “Delay” – number of times a single device is detected before it leaves the area• “Volume” – raw number of unique MAC addresses detected

Page 22: TransPHAT IP Radios Glenn Anderson Traffic Operations – System Operations Branch 2012 Traffic Engineers Meeting

Pros• Continuous 24/7 travel time runs by thousands of

“real” drivers• Long term trends visible• Reduces the need for GPSTravel data collection• Supports MAP-21 federal initiative• Can identify the time of day a problem is occurring• Can identify if the congestion on a certain day was

abnormal• Bonus data such as “delay” and “volume”• O-D Studies possible

Page 23: TransPHAT IP Radios Glenn Anderson Traffic Operations – System Operations Branch 2012 Traffic Engineers Meeting

Cons• Accuracy suffers on shorter segments– For length < .3 mi the data is essentially unusable

• Delay includes all approaches– Good for an overall PM of the arterial– Bad since you cannot see just the coordinated

direction• Does not replace eyes in the field• Does not show exactly where the delay is

occurring or how to fix it• Outlying data points inevitable

Page 24: TransPHAT IP Radios Glenn Anderson Traffic Operations – System Operations Branch 2012 Traffic Engineers Meeting

Sharing the data

• GIS Layer (future)– Standard Segments– Standard Time Periods– Standard Performance Measurements– Color coded map

• Custom Segments and periods – call– User friendly tool for analyzing data

• O-D tools (future)

Page 25: TransPHAT IP Radios Glenn Anderson Traffic Operations – System Operations Branch 2012 Traffic Engineers Meeting
Page 26: TransPHAT IP Radios Glenn Anderson Traffic Operations – System Operations Branch 2012 Traffic Engineers Meeting

Our biggest obstacle:

Finance Cabinet IT Procurement

$51

Page 27: TransPHAT IP Radios Glenn Anderson Traffic Operations – System Operations Branch 2012 Traffic Engineers Meeting

TransPHAT NewsVersion 3.0.8 – April 2012Adds some support for IP Radios

Page 28: TransPHAT IP Radios Glenn Anderson Traffic Operations – System Operations Branch 2012 Traffic Engineers Meeting

TransPHAT News

• Changes due to IP Radios– Communicate with multiple signals simultaneously– TransACT (Automatic Timing Comparison) not finished– System Wide observe features may be possible• Second by second display may be limited by radio bandwidth

– Automatic monitoring of RSSI and Temperature possible

Page 29: TransPHAT IP Radios Glenn Anderson Traffic Operations – System Operations Branch 2012 Traffic Engineers Meeting

TransPHAT News

• An update is coming– LabVIEW 2012 Run Time Engine– Full installation will be required for next version– At least its not Adobe Flash Player…

• Questions, Problems, Suggestions?– Very little feedback the last few years – is this good?

Page 30: TransPHAT IP Radios Glenn Anderson Traffic Operations – System Operations Branch 2012 Traffic Engineers Meeting

New Controllers, The Future?

Page 31: TransPHAT IP Radios Glenn Anderson Traffic Operations – System Operations Branch 2012 Traffic Engineers Meeting

IP Radios• Old network– Ethernet (router) at master cabinet– Serial radios at locals

• New network– Ethernet (router) at master cabinet– Ethernet radios at each local• Multiple devices can now share the network

– TransSTAMP– Conflict Monitors– Cameras– Detectors– Controllers

Page 32: TransPHAT IP Radios Glenn Anderson Traffic Operations – System Operations Branch 2012 Traffic Engineers Meeting
Page 33: TransPHAT IP Radios Glenn Anderson Traffic Operations – System Operations Branch 2012 Traffic Engineers Meeting
Page 34: TransPHAT IP Radios Glenn Anderson Traffic Operations – System Operations Branch 2012 Traffic Engineers Meeting

IP Radio Benefits• Small size• Extremely sensitive – good range• Remote Access and diagnostics• Multiple Repeating possible• Network ID is text – easier to interpret• Easy to program• Serial and Ethernet interface• Lower cost by about 1/2

Page 35: TransPHAT IP Radios Glenn Anderson Traffic Operations – System Operations Branch 2012 Traffic Engineers Meeting
Page 36: TransPHAT IP Radios Glenn Anderson Traffic Operations – System Operations Branch 2012 Traffic Engineers Meeting
Page 37: TransPHAT IP Radios Glenn Anderson Traffic Operations – System Operations Branch 2012 Traffic Engineers Meeting
Page 38: TransPHAT IP Radios Glenn Anderson Traffic Operations – System Operations Branch 2012 Traffic Engineers Meeting
Page 39: TransPHAT IP Radios Glenn Anderson Traffic Operations – System Operations Branch 2012 Traffic Engineers Meeting

Repeating Example:3 levels of repeaters

Page 40: TransPHAT IP Radios Glenn Anderson Traffic Operations – System Operations Branch 2012 Traffic Engineers Meeting

IP Radios – current issues

• “De sensitization” in certain installations– Repeaters?– Cabinets/Poles/Spans with grounding problems

– New model adds additional surge protection

– Have same problems with Encom 5200, we just do not have the ability to see it happening remotely

Page 41: TransPHAT IP Radios Glenn Anderson Traffic Operations – System Operations Branch 2012 Traffic Engineers Meeting

Remote management via browser

• IP address of the router• ID of the traffic signal• The number 51000

• 166.136.115.88:51006– Port = 51000+ID (#6)– Username = admin– Password = zombie

Page 43: TransPHAT IP Radios Glenn Anderson Traffic Operations – System Operations Branch 2012 Traffic Engineers Meeting

Questions?

[email protected]• 502-564-9900 x3888