transformation in central europe
DESCRIPTION
Transformation in central europe. Tereza VorlovÁ Jan Hauser Monash European and EU Centre / Charles university, Prague. Central Europe. Europe b efore 1989. Europe t oday. CEE countries before 1989. Not all part of Soviet Union - communist regimes more or less aligned with USSR. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Transformation in central europe](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062302/56816497550346895dd66cd5/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
www.monash.edu
TRANSFORMATION IN CENTRAL EUROPE
TEREZA VORLOVÁJAN HAUSER
MONASH EUROPEAN AND EU CENTRE / CHARLES UNIVERSITY, PRAGUE
![Page 2: Transformation in central europe](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062302/56816497550346895dd66cd5/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
www.monash.edu 2
CENTRAL EUROPE
Europe before 1989 Europe today
![Page 3: Transformation in central europe](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062302/56816497550346895dd66cd5/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3www.monash.edu
Not all part of Soviet Union - communist regimes more or less aligned with USSR
CEE COUNTRIES BEFORE 1989
![Page 4: Transformation in central europe](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062302/56816497550346895dd66cd5/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
www.monash.edu 4
“COMMUNISM” IN CEEPolitics:
- One party rule- No division of power- No independent courts- No pluralism- No basic freedoms- No free media
Society:
- No civil society - No real trade unions- No prof. organisations- Disinformation
Result? Result? Result?
Economy:
- Centrally planned- No private property- Collective ownership
![Page 5: Transformation in central europe](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062302/56816497550346895dd66cd5/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
www.monash.edu 5
40 YEARS OF COMMUNISM: RESULTS
Prague 1968
• Economic underperformance• Political repressions• Social unrest• Numerous uprisings:
• 1956, 1968, 1970, 1981, 1989
![Page 6: Transformation in central europe](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062302/56816497550346895dd66cd5/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
www.monash.edu 6
WIND OF CHANGE: 1980S
glasnost – openness
perestroika – restructuring
demokratizatsiia – democratisation
![Page 7: Transformation in central europe](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062302/56816497550346895dd66cd5/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
www.monash.edu 7
1989
![Page 8: Transformation in central europe](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062302/56816497550346895dd66cd5/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
www.monash.edu 8
WHAT CHANGE AFTER 1989?The Promise of 1989:
- Political transition- Economic transition - Legal - Societal- Change of mindsets (“minds and hearts”)
![Page 9: Transformation in central europe](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062302/56816497550346895dd66cd5/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
www.monash.edu 9
WHAT CHANGE AFTER 1989?
Politics: Democratically elected governments, institutions & decision-
making, power-sharing, rule of law: human rights (freedom of speech, religion, media freedoms) government non-interferenceEconomy:
Private ownership allowed, free trade (fewer restrictions) no more economic dependence on authorities: dependence on consumers (demand – supply rule), dualism: public & private sectorsSociety:
Pluralistic society with rights & freedoms, values & rules – most difficult, taking a long time
“There is no transformation without rehabilitation, lustration and restitution.” Vojtěch Cepl, 1995
![Page 10: Transformation in central europe](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062302/56816497550346895dd66cd5/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
www.monash.edu 10
ECONOMIC TRANSFORMATION: MASS PRIVATIZATIONExample: Coupon privatization in Czech Republic• “Shock Therapy”
• Over 1800 state companies privatized over 4 years• Poor institutional and legal environment
• Results: decreasing GDP, bankruptcy, corruption, tunneling• Asset-stripping instead of investment
• Mass delusion vs. Economic growth and attracting large amounts of FDI
• “It turns out that the rule of law is probably more basic than privatization. Privatization is meaningless if you don’t have the rule of law.” Milton Friedman, 2002
![Page 11: Transformation in central europe](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062302/56816497550346895dd66cd5/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
www.monash.edu 11
PRIVATIZATION: WHAT HAPPENED?
Bankruptcy• D
ecreasing GDP, growing unemployment
![Page 12: Transformation in central europe](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062302/56816497550346895dd66cd5/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
www.monash.edu 12
INITIAL CHALLENGES• Economic recession
• Corporate governance system that had to develop simultaneously
• Corruption
• Immature banking system
• Capital flight
• Strong reliance on foreign aid and foreign direct investment (FDI) to provide missing capital, which means conditionality and fragility
![Page 13: Transformation in central europe](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062302/56816497550346895dd66cd5/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
www.monash.edu 13
INITIAL CHALLENGES• Rising unemployment
(especially significant considering the “absence” of unemployment during communism)
• Living standards plummet
• Poverty and mortality rates increased, fertility rates dropped (lack of funding and history of such welfare problems)
• Inequality increased (amongst the rich and the poor, but also based on age, education, and region)
• Mass emigration due to poverty and internal conflicts
• Populism in politics (playing up to the fears of people without providing strong policy proposals)
![Page 14: Transformation in central europe](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062302/56816497550346895dd66cd5/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
www.monash.edu 14
WHAT HAPPENED TO THE COMMUNISTS?• Renamed (Hungary, East Germany)• Dissolved/Disappeared (Poland)• Continued (Czech Rep.)
Czech Rep. regional elections 2012 – overall results
![Page 15: Transformation in central europe](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062302/56816497550346895dd66cd5/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
www.monash.edu 15
MID-TERM GOALSMembership in the European Union:
• Democratic• Free market-economy• Stable institutions• Not involved in conflicts• Capacity to implement EU body of law
Membership in International Organisations(thus legal changes):
• Council of Europe • WTO • OECD• NATO
Václav Havel in U.S. Congresshttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zplMpbZkEaM
![Page 16: Transformation in central europe](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062302/56816497550346895dd66cd5/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
www.monash.edu 16
“RETURN TO EUROPE”Alignment with the EU:
Requirements consistent with CEE’s chosen path
External pressure consolidates changes
All CEE states complied with EU laws by 2004
Central Europe as a power block within EU
![Page 17: Transformation in central europe](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062302/56816497550346895dd66cd5/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
www.monash.edu 17
RETURN TO EUROPETransition in Central and Eastern Europe has been difficult
CEE as testing ground for simultaneous introduction of democracy and a neo-liberal market economy
Exact circumstances and outcomes differ widely from country to country
Stability has proven to be a very important factor for a successful economy
The role of democracy is uncertain, though there is a moral commitment to it because of the role of CEE countries in international organisations
It is uncertain how the countries of CEE will fare in the short-term, and what their role will be in an enlarged Europe
![Page 18: Transformation in central europe](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062302/56816497550346895dd66cd5/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
www.monash.edu 18
MISSION ACCOMPLISHED?
Successes Challenges remainingCEE = consolidated democracies (by all standards)
- Low trust in key institutions - Politicised key institutions - Parliaments’ fragmentation - Weak political parties - Corruption still a problem
Functioning free marketRemarkable economic growth
- CEE still as Europe’s periphery- Recent crisis: affected CEE
Transition without economic chaos, ‘valley of tears’ & social upheavals
Rapid social changeCohesive citizenry
- Democratic norms still not fully ingrained / accepted
Successful EU membership - Still a catalyst for change- Declining support for EU integration