transcript judge isom 9.06am feb 01 2007 conflict

Upload: neil-gillespie

Post on 04-Jun-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/13/2019 TRANSCRIPT Judge Isom 9.06am Feb 01 2007 Conflict

    1/24

    IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUITIN THE STATE OF FLORIDA, IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTYCIVIL DIVISION

    NEIL J . GILLESPIE,P l a i n t i f f , Case No. 05-7205- v s - Div i s i on : "H"

    BARKER RODEMS COOK, P.A. ,a F l o r i d a co r po r a t i on ; WILLIAM J . COOK,Defendan t s .

    /

    TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS

    BEFORE: HONOR BLE CLAUDIACi r cu i t Judge R ISOM

    TAKEN AT: George EdgecombIn ChambersTampa, Flo r i daCour thouse

    DATE TIME: Februa ry 1,9:06 a .m. 2007

    REPORTED BY: Mary E l i z abe t hNotary Pub l i c813-229-8225

    Blaze r

    Be r r yh i l l Assoc i a t e s , Inc .501 Eas t Kennedy Boulevard , Su i t e 1225Tampa, F lo r i d a 33602

  • 8/13/2019 TRANSCRIPT Judge Isom 9.06am Feb 01 2007 Conflict

    2/24

    123456789

    10111213141516171819202122232425

    C

    APPEARANCESFor t h e P l a i n t i f f :

    Ne i l J Gi l l e s p i e Pro Se

    For t h e Defendan t s :RYAN CHRISTOPHER RODEMS ESQUIREarker Rodems ook400 Nor th Ash ley D r iv e S u i t e 2100Tampa F l o r i d a 33602

    813-489-1001

  • 8/13/2019 TRANSCRIPT Judge Isom 9.06am Feb 01 2007 Conflict

    3/24

    123457

    89

    10111213141516171819202122232425

    3

    P R O C E E DIN G STHE COURT: G i l l e s p i e ; you guys a r e p r o b a b l y

    go i ng to t a k e more t ha n 15 -- more t h a n 5 m i n u t e s .So t h e r e s nobody he r e f o r E l e c r a and Wel l s Fargo .Everybody e l s e i s c a n c e l e d .

    So - - my j u d i c i a l a s s i s t a n t s a i d t h a t our 9:30lS c a n c e l e d , which i s a 45-m i nu t e h e a r i n g .

    Oh, yeah . Okay. So w e l l start w i t h yoursand t hen a t 9:15 , w e l l b r e a k .

    You guys a r e G i l l e s p i e , r i g h t ?MR GILLESPIE: Yes, ma am.T H E COURT: All r i g h t . W e l l b r e a k and do

    anybody e l s e that s a p p e a r i n g t e l e p h o n i c a l l yb e c a u s e w e v e go t a little c u s h i o n t h e r e a t 9 :30 .

    Okay. Mr. G i l l e s p i e .MR GILLESPIE: Good morn ing , Your Honor .THE COURT: Good morning .You have e v i d e n t l y j u s t droppe d o f f someth ing

    new t h i s morning t h a t I h a v e n t had a c ha nc e tol o o k a t .

    MR GILLESPIE: That does no t p e r t a i n tot o d a y .

    THE COURT: I t does no t p e r t a i n to t oda y?MR GILLESPIE: No. T h a t s a c o u r t e s y copy of

    a m o t i o n to compel d i s c o v e r y .C

  • 8/13/2019 TRANSCRIPT Judge Isom 9.06am Feb 01 2007 Conflict

    4/24

  • 8/13/2019 TRANSCRIPT Judge Isom 9.06am Feb 01 2007 Conflict

    5/24

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    5

    1234

    6

    7

    89

    111213

    141 6171819

    21222324

    And in d o i n g so -- g o s h , wha t is t h e name o ft h e c a s e ? I f y o u l l l o o k a t t h e c a s e s , there s ac a s e o u t o f So u t h F l o r i d a , p r o b a b l y a b o u t t e n y e a r sag o , in t h a t t ime f r ame , t h a t s t a n d s f o r t h ep r o p o s i t i o n t h a t political c o n t r i b u t i o n s in and o ft h e m s e l v e s a r e n o t d i s q u a l i f y i n g . But I mean ifyou want to a l l e g e o t h e r e x t r a judicial t y p e o ft h i n g s , y o u r e welcome to do so .

    MR GILLESPIE: Thank you , Your H o n o r .MR RODEMS: I f I may I h av e b r o u g h t c o p i e s

    o f b o t h o f t h o s e c a s e s .THE COURT: What i s it? It s n o t Toys R Us

    b u t it s s o m e t h i n g l i k e t h a t , isn t it?MR RODEMS: Mac enzie ve r su s Super Kids

    Barga in S toreTHE COURT: T h a t s S u p e r K id s B a r g a i n S t o r e .

    A l l I c o u l d t h i n k o f was Toys R Us. I knew itw a s n t Toys R Us.

    MR RODEMS: It s a F l o r i d a Su p reme C o u r t c a s ea c t i o n . I ll be happy to g i v e Mr. G i l l e s p i e ac o p y .

    THE COURT: Al l r i g h t .MR RODEMS: T h a t s , f o r t h e r e c o r d , 565 So .2 d

    1 3 3 2 .And I m a l s o gOlOg t o g i v e him Nathanson

  • 8/13/2019 TRANSCRIPT Judge Isom 9.06am Feb 01 2007 Conflict

    6/24

    6

    1

    2

    345

    7

    89

    1011121314151 6171819202122232425

    ve r s u s Korv ick K-O-R-V-I-C-K, which is 577 S o . 2 d943 , which a l s o a d d r e s s e s t h a t t o p i c .

    THE COURT: Yeah.And in p o i n t in f a c t , ev en t h e f e l l o w t h a t I

    u l t i m a t e l y was a b l e t o p r e v a i l o v e r f o r when I ranf o r o f f i c e 17 y e a r s ago , I was o n l y d i s q u a l i f i e df rom -- by p r e c e d i n g o v e r h i s c a s e s f o r t h r e ey e a r s , and t h en o n ly if he wanted me t o . nd lnt h a t i n s t a n c e he d i d n t want me to d i s q u a l i f ym y s e l f b e c a u s e we had ru n a v e r y c l e a n c a m p a i g n andnone o f us had t a k e n any p e r s o n a l s h o t s a t t h eother s c h a r a c t e r o r f a m i l y o r a n y t h i n g , so

    Anyway do t h e r e s e a r c h and if you want tofile a t r u e mo t i o n to d i s q u a l i f y , t h e n I ll r u l eupon it on an e x p e d i t i o u s man n er .

    MR GILLESPIE: A l l r i g h t . Ju d g e , c a n Is p eak ?

    THE COURT: Yes.MR GILLESPIE: Thank you .I m n o t l o o k i n g to d i s q u a l i f y you . I had r e a d

    t h e d i s c l o s u r e on y o u r w e b s i t e and t h a t p ro m p t e d mejust to do a little c h e c k i n g w i t h t h e c a m p a i g nc o n t r i b u t i o n s . I found a c o u p l e t h a t w ere inq u e s t i o n . I m aw are o f t h e l aw on that. So I mn o t a s k i n g you to be d i s q u a l i f i e d on that.

  • 8/13/2019 TRANSCRIPT Judge Isom 9.06am Feb 01 2007 Conflict

    7/24

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    7

    1234

    6789

    111213

    1416171819

    21) )

    2324

    I j u s t want to make s u r e , you know, we g e t afair trial he re , a fair h e a r i n g . T h a t was myc o n c e r n .

    And I 'm more co n ce r n ed w i t h p a r t 2 , and nowt h a t w e ' v e a d d r e s s e d t h e i s s u e s 1n p a r t 1 . It hasto do w i th Mr. Rodems ' s -- which I b e l i e v e i s g o i n gto be h i s i n t e n t to b r i n g up some t h i n g s f rom t h ep a s t . And I h av e a copy o f this t e l e p h o n e call tome. It s a copy f o r you . Th i s i s f o r you , J u d g e .

    And if you c o u l d t u r n -- by t h e way, this c a l lwas a call t h a t Mr. Rodems p l a c e d and left on myc e l l p h o n e a n s w e r i n g s e r v i c e on December t h e 1 3 t h .And if you t u r n to p ag e 7, that s w h ere he makesh i s r e f e r e n c e .

    And it goes -- t h e s e c o n d p a r a g r a p h , t h es eco n d s e n t e n c e ; and he s ay s -- this is Mr. Rodems.

    THE COURT: Excuse me. O ff t h e r e c o r d .( O f f - t h e - r e c o r d d i s c u s s i o n . )THE COURT: Okay. Back on t h e r e c o r d .MR GILLESPIE: So a t t h a t t i m e Mr. Rodems

    s a y s , And you a l s o f i l e d c l a i m s a g a i n s t t h e j udge1n P i n e l l a s C o u n ty .

    And t h e n he g o e s , I s u s p e c t y o u ' r e p r o b a b l yd r a f t i n g a c o m p l a i n t a g a i n s t me.

    W i t h o u t g o i n g t h r o u g h t h i s w h o l e p h o n e messag e

  • 8/13/2019 TRANSCRIPT Judge Isom 9.06am Feb 01 2007 Conflict

    8/24

    123456789

    10111213141516171819202122232425

    8

    t h a t he left t h i s was j u s t ad hominem a b u s i v e r a n ti s t h e o n l y way to d e s c r i b e it b u t I m c o n c e r n e d t h a t he i s g o i n g to want to b r i n g this -- make t h i sp a r t o f t h e trial and o r p a r t o f t h ec o n t r o v e r s y . And I went t h r o u g h h e r e d e s c r i b i n gwhat h e s r e f e rr in g to in t h i s phone call.

    And in f a c t , I have t h e s u p p o r t o f G o v e rn o rBush on it. That would be E x h i b i t J I m s o r r y .E x h i b i t 2 i s a t e l e p h o n e mes s ag e f rom t h eG o v e r n o r s o f f i c e on t h a t . And t h e n E x h i b i t 3 lS aletter f rom t he G o v ern o r h i m s e l f .

    So and t h i s t h i s m a t t e r d a t e s b ack to1 9 9 8 , 1 9 9 9 . So h e s r e a l l y g o in g way b ack in t h eh i s t o r y to drudge up r e a l l y what i s a r e d h e r r i n g . And I m c o n c e r n e d t h a t it d o e s n t p r e j u d i c e t h eC o u r t b e c a u se t h e r e s been enough p r o b l em in t h i sc a s e a l r e a d y , and I j u s t want t o a v o i d t h a t a t t h eo u t s e t ; o t h e r w i s e , I am v e r y c o n f i d e n t i n t h e Cour tb e i n g a b l e to h an d le t h i s fairly.

    THE COURT: Okay. So your c o n c e r n a b o u t mep r e s i d i n g o v e r t he c a se b e c a u s e o f a transcript youf i l e d w i t h t he C o u r t ?

    MR GILLESPIE: Becau s e o f this m a t t e r t h a tMr. Rodems i s r e f e r r i n g to which i n v o l v e d ane l e c t i o n c o m p l a i n t t o t h e F l o r i d a E l e c t i o n s

  • 8/13/2019 TRANSCRIPT Judge Isom 9.06am Feb 01 2007 Conflict

    9/24

    12345

    15

    67

    9

    1011121314

    25

    161718192021222324

    9

    C o m m is s io n a b o u t a j u d g e in P i n e l l a s C o u n t y in1999 .

    THE COURT: Okay. So b u t o b v i o u s l y Iw o u l d n ' t know a b o u t this u n l e s s you filed it w i t ht h e C o u r t , w h i ch you have .

    MR. GILLESPIE: It s b een filed. I meanb e f o r e

    THE COURT: So b u t wh a t d o e s it h av eto do w i t h w i t h G i l l e s p i e v e r s u sB a r k e r Rodems Cook?

    MR. GILLESPIE: It has n o t h i n g to do w i t h it.It s h o u l d h av e n o t h i n g t o do w i t h it. Mr. Rodemsf o r w h a t e v e r r e a s o n , is b r i n g i n g it i n t o t h e c a s e .

    In f a c t , in h i s d i sc o v e r y h e ' s a s k e d a b o u tit In h i s d i s c o v e r y and t h a t wo u ld b e i n t h e m o t i o nh e r e , page 3 .

    THE COURT: Oh you g u y s a r e co m in g b a c k ont h e 5 t h ?

    MR. RODEMS: Yes ma 'am.THE COURT: Y o u ' r e co mi n g b a c k on t h e 5 t h ?Oh so we d o n ' t have to wade t h r o u g h

    e v e r y t h i n g t o d a y and make s u r e e v e r y t h i n g lSa d d r e s s e d .

    How l o n g do you have r e s e r v e d on t h e 5 t h ?MR. RODEMS: I b e l i e v e we h a v e a total o f

  • 8/13/2019 TRANSCRIPT Judge Isom 9.06am Feb 01 2007 Conflict

    10/24

    10

    1234567

    910111213

    1415161718192

    212223

    24) cL

    t h r e e h o u r s .MR GILLESPIE: T h ree h o u r s .MR. RODEMS: T h ere a r e p r o b a b l y if I r e c a l l

    c o r r e c t l y e i g h t o r n i n e different m o t i o n s t h a tn eed to be a d d r e s s e d .

    THE COURT: A l l r i g h t . Then f o r t o d a y t h e n wecan do it in f i v e m i n u t e s . In a n u t s h e l l , w h a t st h e s e c o n d h a l f o f t h e mo t i o n you s e t f o r t o d ay ?

    MR. GILLESPIE: J u s t to let t h e C o u r t knowt h a t Mr. Rodems i s g o i n g to be o r a t t e m p t s i sa t t e m p t i n g to blow t h i s m a t t e r o f an e l e c t i o ncamp a i g n c o m p l a i n t f rom 1 9 9 9 , b r i n g t h a t i n t o t h i sc o m p l a i n t . And I want to j u s t make s u r e t h a t youd o n t h av e a p ro b l em w i t h it.

    B e c a u s e a s a jU d g e , I would t h i n k t h a t t h a tw o u ld be s o m e t h i n g t h a t you would be sensitivea b o u t , ev en t h o u g h it was r e s o l v e d I t h i n k fairlyf o r all parties.

    THE COURT: ( P au s e . )Okay. Wel l , if you d o n t want me t o be aware

    o f t h i n g s t h a t has been s a i d exjudicially I meano u t s i d e t h e c o u r t r o o m s e t t i n g , you d o n t h a v e tofile transcripts l i k e this. If you do w an t me t obe aw are o f them, which e v i d e n t l y this o n e you d i dwant me to be aware o f it j u s t as k them to h o ld .

  • 8/13/2019 TRANSCRIPT Judge Isom 9.06am Feb 01 2007 Conflict

    11/24

    11

    1

    34

    6789

    10111213

    141516171819202122232425

    So I mean you f i l e d t h i s . As f a r a s I mc onc e rne d i s t h i s go ing to be a nonJ ury o r aJ u r y trial?

    MR GILLESPIE: This one i s g o i n g to j u r ytrial

    THE COURT: A Ju ry trial?So e s p e c i a l l y in a j u r y trial s i t u a t i o n , I

    d o n t se e how it would be r e l e v a n t b e c a u s e it l ooksl i k e t he comments made by c o u n s e l had more to dow i th your he was s p e c u l a t i n g on why you mighthave d i f f i c u l t y f i n d i n g new c o u n s e l . And I d o n ts e e t h a t t h a t would be s o me th in g t h a t would bep l a c e d b e f o r e a j u r y b e c a u se n o r m a l l y ana t t o r n e y wel l , I j u s t d o n t s e e how it would ber e l e v a n t to any i s s u e b e f o r e a j u r y .

    MR GILLESPIE: And it s h o u l d n t be r e l e v a n t ,Judge .

    THE COURT: Yeah.MR GILLESPIE: I a gre e w i th you. But

    Mr. Rodems i s making it r e l e v a n t .And I m j u s t going to s p e c u l a t e f o r a moment

    t h a t y o u r e no t r e a l f a m i l i a r w i th t h i s c a s e a tt h i s p o i n t .

    THE COURT: Well , I mean I I r e v i e we v e r y t h i n g t h a t you t h a t you file and Mr. Rodems

  • 8/13/2019 TRANSCRIPT Judge Isom 9.06am Feb 01 2007 Conflict

    12/24

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    12

    1234

    678

    111213

    1 416171819

    21222324

    files, b u t In t e rms o f -- I r e v i e w t h em i n t e r m s o fdo I need to do someth ing t o d a y on this. And l i k eI s a i d w i t h t he one where you f i l e d t h e n o t i c e o fconflict, it w a s n t i n t he f o r m a t where I n e e d e d toa c t upon it.

    MR GILLESPIE: In o t h e r w o r d s , J u d g e , a r e youaware t h a t t h i s c a s e has been t r a n s f e r r e d f roma n o t h e r judge?

    THE COURT: Yes I do know t h a t b e c a u s e t hec l e r k hand d e l i v e r s them w h e n e v e r t h e y g e tr e a s s i g n e d t o a n o t h e r d i v i s i o n .

    MR GILLESPIE: And t h e r e a s o n t h a t it wasr e a s s i g n e d -

    MR RODEMS: Your Honor a t this p o i n t Io b j e c t . W e r e g o i n g f a r a f i e l d o f wha t t h e mot ionon t h e t a b l e is. His s p e c u l a t i o n s a b o u t wha t I maybe d o i n g o r what may happen , it s n o t n e c e s s a r y f o rr e s o l v in g t o d a y s m a t te r s . And I really o b j e c t tohim g i v i n g h i s s p i n on what he t h i n k s lS h a p p e n i n gIn t h i s c a s e so f a r .

    THE COURT: Al l r i g h t . At this p o i n t , it i s9: 15. So I m g o i n g to t a k e a b r e a k f rom y o u r c a s eand g e t t h e 9 :15 -- t h e t e l e p h o n i c s d o n e .

    ( R e c e s s e d f rom 9 :19 a .m . until 9 : 2 8 a . m . )THE COURT: A l l r i g h t . So back t o you guys .

  • 8/13/2019 TRANSCRIPT Judge Isom 9.06am Feb 01 2007 Conflict

    13/24

    13

    12345678910111213

    14151617181920212223242 ,)

    What was t h e nar row t h i n g we were d o i n g t o d a ys i n c e y o u r e coming b a c k f o r s e v e r a l h o u r s on t h e5 t h ?

    MR. GILLESPIE: J u d g e , wh a t I w a n t e d t o knowwas a b o u t t h e d e f e n d a n t Mr. C o o k s 150 paym ent tot h e C o u r t s husband , and what o t h e r r e l a t i o n s h i p hem i g h t h a v e .

    THE COURT: e we d o n t have any s o c i a l ,b u s i n e s s o r b l o o d r e l a t i o n s h i p w i t h Mr. Cook.Mr. Cook, a s f a r as I know, ba s e d upon wha t yous a i d , I v e n e v e r even r e a d a list o f my h u s b a n d sc o n t r i b u t o r s . Based upon your i n f o r m a t i o n I assumeMr. Cook gave my h u s b a n d a political c o n t r i b u t i o nwhen he r a n f o r judge u n s u c c e s s f u l l y a few y e a r sago .

    MR. GILLESPIE: I s e e .THE COURT: But we d o n t have any b u s i n e s s ,

    s o c i a l or f a m i l y r e l a t i o n s h i p w i t h Mr. Cook.MR. GILLESPIE: Thank you, Your Honor .THE COURT: Uh-huh.MR. GILLESPIE: And I j u s t want t h e r e c o r d to

    reflect t h a t I m r e p r e s e n t i n g m y s e l f t o d a y o u t o fn e c e s s i t y . I would much r a t h e r h a v e an a t t o r n e yh e r e . And I m still work ing on that And I mayh e a r so m e t h i n g t oda y o r t omor row.

  • 8/13/2019 TRANSCRIPT Judge Isom 9.06am Feb 01 2007 Conflict

    14/24

    14

    12

    345

    7

    8

    9

    10111213141 I

    1 617181920212223245

    THE COURT: Okay. A l l r i g h t . So i s t h e r ea n y t h i n g e l s e you needed?

    MR GILLESPIE: The o n l y o t h e r m a t te r would beMr. Rodems a t t e m p t t o b r i n g i n t o this h e a r i n g t h i sm a t t e r f rom 1998 , 1999 , and w h e t h e r o r n o t he ll bep e r m i t t e d to do t h a t , and if t h a t w o u ld affect t h eC o u r t s v iew o f me.

    THE COURT: Okay. L i k e I s a i d , if you d o n twant to b r i n g in t h i s e x t r a n e o u s stuff, d o n t filetranscripts o f it. And it would n o t -- if it s aj u r y trial, t h e e v i d e n c e w i l l be w h a t s l e g a l l ya d m i s s i b l e and co mp e ten t . And just b a s e d uponr e v i e w i n g t h a t t r a n s c r i p t , I d o n t I d o n t seea t this moment how it would be l e g a l l y a d m i s s i b l eo r c o m p e t e n t . So, no, it w o u l d n t have any e f f e c t .

    J u d g e s h e a r stuff all t h e t i m e that s n o tr e l e v a n t and t h e y and t h e y d i s r e g a r d it. Fori n s t a n c e , l i k e in p r e s i d i n g o v e r a mo t io n tos u p p r e s s an illegal s e a r c h o r an illegalc o n f e s s i o n , we p r e s i d e o v e r it, r u l e on it, andt h e n we d i s r e g a r d it in t e r ms o f what g o e s on lateron in t h e c a s e . So j u d g e s , i n c l u d i n g m y s e l f , a r ep e r f e c t l y c a p a b l e o f d i s r e g a r d i n g irrelevant o ri n c o m p e t e n t i n f o r m a t i o n when p r e s i J i n g o v e r am a t t e r .

  • 8/13/2019 TRANSCRIPT Judge Isom 9.06am Feb 01 2007 Conflict

    15/24

  • 8/13/2019 TRANSCRIPT Judge Isom 9.06am Feb 01 2007 Conflict

    16/24

    16

    123456789

    10111213

    14151 61718192021222324)c

    c o n s i d e r i n g r e p r e s e n t i n g you?MR. GILLESPIE: I v e b een ln t o u c h w i t h th e

    H i l l s b o r o u g h C o u n t y Bar A s s o c i a t i o n .THE COURT: Oh t h e l a w y e r referral?MR. GILLESPIE: Lawyer R e f e r r a l S e r v i c e .THE COURT: Okay.MR. GILLESPIE: And I ve b e e n getting what

    w o u l d call -- w e l l , h e r e s t h e p r o b l e m a s I s e e it.The l a w y e r s a r e l o o k i n g f o r c a s e s that a r e w o r t hs e v e r a l h u n d r e d t h o u s a n d dollars i n d a m a g e s , andthis c a s e is b e lo w that. So i t s -- a part o f itis a f i n a n c i a l i s s u e .

    THE COURT: W el l , it must be a t least S 1 5 , 0 0 0o r e l s e you w o u l d n t be in circuit c o u r t .

    MR. GILLESPIE: Yes .And t h e o t h e r m a t te r is if if t h e -- t h e

    B ar t h e referral s e r v i c e h a s a b o u t e x h a u s t e dwh a t t h e y can do . y n e x t move w o u l d b e t o p l a c ean ad i n t h e n e w s p a p e r and t r y an d solicit c o u n s e lthat way.

    THE COURT: W el l , you c o u l d try Pinellas,P i n e l l a s isn t t h a t f a r away , if t h e y h a v e areferral s e r v i c e .

    MR. GILLESPIE: Yes that s what H i l l s b o r o u g hs u g g e s t e d .

    I

  • 8/13/2019 TRANSCRIPT Judge Isom 9.06am Feb 01 2007 Conflict

    17/24

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    17

    1234

    6789

    111213

    141 6171819

    21222324

    THE COURT: Oh t h e y d i d ?MR GILLESPIE: Yes. The p ro b l e m i s w i th

    t h a t , it s v e ry i n e f f i c i e n t g o in g to one l a w y e r a ta t ime r a t h e r t han p u t t i n g it ou t t h e r e f o rsomebody t o c o n s i d e r b r o a d l y . Because g o i n g a t itone l awyer a t a t ime h a s n t - - h a s n t p r o v i d e da n y t h i n g .

    The o t h e r - - one l aw y e r t h a t was g o i n g to t a k et h e c a s e s p e c i f i c a l l y was c o n c e r n e d t h a t once t hel a w y e r f i l e d an a p p e a ra n c e , t h a t b e c a u s e t h ed e f e n d a n t i s r e p r e s e n t i n g h i m s e l f , t h a t t h e y r e notp a y i n g f o r l e g a l f e e s , so t h e y r e j u s t g o i n g toc h u rn t he c a se o v e r and o v e r and r u n t h e bill upand t h e n you w o u l d n t let t h e l a w y e r r e p r e s e n t i n gme o u t o f t he c a s e r e s u l t i n g in a h i g h l e g a l bill.That was a n o t h e r c o n c e rn . Tha t l a w y e r d e s c r i b e dt h a t s i t u a t i o n to me as i n v o l u n t a r y s e r v i t u d e .So

    (Cour t l a u g h i n g . )-- t h a t was - - t h a t was a p ro b l e m t h e r e .THE COURT: Wel l , I d o n t I don t know bu t

    in t e rms o f your s e a r c h fo r l e g a l c o u n s e l , youknow I c a n t g i v e you any a d v i c e

    MR GILLESPIE: I u n d e r s t a n d .THE COURT: beyond what t h e referral

  • 8/13/2019 TRANSCRIPT Judge Isom 9.06am Feb 01 2007 Conflict

    18/24

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    18

    12

    34

    6789

    11121314

    1 617181 9

    21222324

    s e r v i c e has a l r e a dy g iven you soMR. GILLESPIE: Than k you, LTudge.THE COURT: Okay. See you guys on t h e 5 t h .MR. RODEMS: Thank you, Judg e .THE COURT: Thank you , Madam Cou r t Repo r t e r .Conc luded a t 9 :35 a .m . )

  • 8/13/2019 TRANSCRIPT Judge Isom 9.06am Feb 01 2007 Conflict

    19/24

    19

    234r'

    678

    910111213

    4151617181920212223242

    COURT CERTIFICATE

    STATE OF FLORIDACOUNTY OF HILLSBOROUGH

    I M RY ELIZABETH BLAZER c e r t i f y t h a t I wasau t ho r i z e d to and d id s t e nog r a ph i c a l l y r e po r t t h ef o r ego i ng p roc e ed i ng s and t h a t t h e t r a n s c r i p t i s a t r u er e c o r d .

    Dated t h i s 20 th day o f Februa ry 2007 .l' ', ,' ~ . , , , , ~ ; L I . . . . ~ , , \ / ~ ~ , - - - - - , - - - - M - i R - Y - - E - c r z - A - B - E - - H - ~ B - C A - Z - E - R - - - - - - - - - - - -

  • 8/13/2019 TRANSCRIPT Judge Isom 9.06am Feb 01 2007 Conflict

    20/24

    943 [ ] 6 29:06 [1 ] 1 2 29:15 [3] 3/9 12 22 12 239:19 a m [1] 12/249:28 a m [1 ] 12/249:30 [2] ] 6 3/149:35 a m [1 ] 1 8 6A

    1 9 1 5blood [1] 13 9blow [1] l 11]both [1] 1 Lbreach [1 ] I. / l.-break [3 ] j / C 3 2 1 .2 /2 2b r in g [6] 7 7 8 3 10/12 14

    111 9 1 5 7b r in g in g [1] 9 13broad ly [1] 1 7 5brought [1] 5 1 0Bush [1] 8 8business [2] 13 9 13/17but [11] 4/14 4/21 5 6 5/1 3

    8 2 9 3 9 8 1 1 1 9 12/1 13/17/21c

  • 8/13/2019 TRANSCRIPT Judge Isom 9.06am Feb 01 2007 Conflict

    21/24

    17/22

    C e l ec t i o n [3]~ l e t i o n s [1] 0/ ,.::::: l U I 118/25 1 ~ ] / 4

    corpora t ion [1] 1/10 El izabe th [3] 1/23 19 /10 19/15co r rec t l y [1] 10/4 e l se [6] 3/5 3 /13 4/7 14/2could [4] 4/22 5/17 7/10 16/21 15/25 16/14counsel [4] 11/9 11/11 16 /19COUNTY [5] 1/1 7/22 9/1 1 6 /31 ) / 8couple [1] 6/23court [12] ] 11 4/3 5 /19 8 /16

    8/18 8 / 22 9 /5 1 0 /9 16/1417/19 1 8 /5 1 9 /5Court ' s [2] 1 3 / 6 1 4 / 7cour tesy [2] 3/24 4/21Courthouse [1] 1 /1 9courtroom [1] 10/22

    j-:c:..:u:..:s:..:;h:.=i;.::o.:;n'--'[.::1-'-] __ .:::3.:. ./..::;1... :4odamages [1] 16/10DATE [1] 1/21Dated [1] 19/14da tes [1] 8112day [2] 15/18 19/14December [1] 7/12defendant [2] 13/5 17/11Defendants [2] 1/11 2 /6del ivers [1] 12/10descr ibe [1] 8 / 2descr ibed [1] 17/16descr ib ing [1] 8/5

    4/18 G/g 6/14 6/20disqual i fy ing [1] 5 /6d i s re g a rd [2] 14/17 14/21dis regard ing [1] 14/23div is ion [3] 1 /2 1 /9 12/11do [19] 3/12 4 /19 5/8 6/136/22 7/6 9 /9 9/11 9/12 9/2410/7 10/23 11/9 12/2 12 /2

    12/9 14/6 15/6 16/18do the [1] 6/13docket [1] 4/9does [3 ] 3f?1 3/23 9 /8doesn ' t [1] n/ doing [3] 5/1 12/17 13/1d o l l a r s [1] 16/10don ' t [15] g / L l 10/14 10/20

    1 ) ? ~ ~ L1/S 11111 11/14 13/8D / 1 7 14/8 14/9 14 /13 14 /1317/21 17/21

    done [1] 12 /2 3dra f t ing [1] 7/24Drive [1] 2 /8dropped [1] 3/18

    j-::d:.::r.=u:::d;;z.g,e=-- ,,[ : : . , , ] ~ . . . . : : 8 . . . . : / . . . . : 1 : : . . . . 4 : - -EEdgecomb [ 1] 1 /19e f fec t [1) 14/15eigh t [ 1] 1 () / 4e i ther [1] 4/23Elecra [1] 3/4

    enough [1] 8/16esp ec i a l l y [1] 11/7ESQUIRE [1] 2/7even [ 3] 6 / 4 1 0 /1 7every [1] 4/6Everybody [1] 3/5every th ing [3] 9/22evidence [1] 14/11e v id e n t ly [2] 3/H:Excuse [1] 7/17exhausted [1] 16/17

    13 /11

    9/22 11/2510/='4

    Exhib i t [3 ] 8/8 8/9 8/10---l Exhib i t 2 [1] 8 /9Ex h ib i t 3 [2] 8/8 8/10- - - j ex jud ic ia l ly [1] 10/21expedi t ious [2] 4/23 6 /15ex t ra [1] 5/7ex t raneous [1] 14/9I-Ffac t [3) 6/4 817 /14f a i r [2] '7 / ) 7/ ; .f a i r l y [2] ~ i l q i I / ~ / f ami l i a r [1] 11/2, 'family [2] 6/12 1311efa r [5] 11/1 12/15 12/20

    16/22did [4] 4/15 10/24 17/1 19/11 Fargo [1] 3/4didn t [1 ] 6/9 fashion [1] 4/23d i f f e r e n t [1] 10/4 February [3] 1/21 15/11 19/14d i f f i c u l t y [1] 11/11 fees [1] 17/12disclose [1] 4/15 fe l low [1] 6/4disclosure [2] 4/10 6/21 few [1] 13/14discovery [5] 3 /2 5 9/14 9/15 f i l e [5] 4/18 6/14 10/23 11/25lS/2 1 5 /9 14/9discuss ion [1] 7/18 f i l e d [7] 7/21 8/22 9/4 9/6disqua l i f i ed [2] 6/6 6/25 11/1 I N 3 17!lOd i sq u a l i fy [7] 4/11 4/12 4 /16 f i l e s [1] L U I

    f i n an c i a l [1] 1.6/ Uf ind ing [1] iI/IIf i rm ' s [1] 15/6f ive [1) 10/7FLORIDA [9] 1/1 1/10 1/20 2 / 8

    5/3 5/19 8/25 15 /4 19/7foregoing [1] 19/12format [1] 12/4found [1] 6/23frame [1] 5/4

    ~ f ~ r : . . : : : a ~ u ~ d - - - i [ - = 1 . L ] - - ~ 1 . : : . . 5 . . . . / . : . . . 7 - - - - - - - - ~ ' 11 [ 3 ] 4 / :: n :: / 20 h'" 14Ggave [1] .I .c: / 1_'George [1] l . / t Qg e t [4] 4 7 1 1 2 1 1 0 1 2 2 3ge t t ing [1] 1617GILLESPIE [8] 1/7 2 /3 3 /2 3 /10

    3/15 4/7 5 /20 9/9give [3] 5/20 5/25 1 7 /23given [1] 18/1giv ing [1] 12/19goes [4] 4/11 7/15 7/23 14/21

    ---1 going [16] 3/3 5 / 25 7 / 6 7 / 258/3 8/13 10/10 11/2 11/411/21 12/15 12/22 17/3 1 7 /517/8 1 7 / 1 ~ :

    gone [1] 1 ':0 / 2 0Good [2] 3 / J6 3 / 1 'gosh [1] 5/1

    - j h e ' l l [1] U I

    13/10

    got [1] J ! l 4Governor [2] 8/'7 8/11Governor ' s [1] 8/10guess [1] 1 5 /8guys [6] 3/2 3 /1 0 9/17 12/2

    15/20 18/3Hhad [6] 3 /1 9 4/14 6/10 6/11

    6/20 1 1 /9h a l f [1] 1 0 /8hand [1] 12 / 1(lhandle [1] 8 l qhappen [1] 1 2. / 17happening [1] 12/1 Qhappy [1] 5 /2 0has [9] 4/21 4 /23 4/25 7 / 5

    9/11 10/21 12 /7 16/17 18/1h as n ' t [2] 17/6 17/6have [25]haven ' t [1] 3 / 1 9he [12] 6 /8 6/9 7/13 7/16 7

    8/1 8 /3 11/10 12/19 13/613/14 15/3

    h e ' s [3] 8/6 : '1 /1 3 0/14hear [2] i 3 ; . , . ~ . , I-1/Jbh e a r in g [4 ] . - : /7 i I 14/4 15here [5] i/-4 7 / 2 i : : / ~ )

  • 8/13/2019 TRANSCRIPT Judge Isom 9.06am Feb 01 2007 Conflict

    22/24

    I mat te rs [1] 12/18 obv i ous l y [1] 9 /3r- ~ ~ m a y [4] 5 / 10 12 / 16 12 / 17 13 / 24 o f f [3] 3 / 18 7 / 17 7/18involved [1] 8/24 me [16] 4/11 4/18 4 /22 6 /8 6 / 9 Off - th e - r eco rd [ l J 7/18i r r e l e v a n t [1] 14 / 23 6/21 7 /9 7/17 7/24 8 / / 0 10/20 o f f i c e [2] 6/ C, 8 / 1 0i s [33] 10/23 ]0 /2 5 H / 7 1 7 / J ~ , 17/17 Oh [5] ,I:' 9 / J 7 " / 21 16/4 1isn't [2] /l. 3 16/22 mean [5] 5 / 6 9 / 6 l 0/21 11 / 1 Okay [16] 3 J / . l5 l ] i3150M [1] 1 / 18 11 /24 - IJ < :} 8 /2 I 9 /3 1n/ 20 1 4 l 1i s sue [2] 11 / 15 16/12 means [1] 4/24 15 / 13 1: , /17 151;:4 16 / 6 1;',/i s sues [1] 7 /5 media t ion [1] 15/21 on [28]it [54] message [2] 7/25 8 /9 once [1] 1 7 /9it's [12] 4/144/245/125/13 might [2] 1 l /1 0 13/7 one [6] 10 / 24 1 l / 4 12/3 17/

    5/197/0 , 9 /6 1 2 / 1 7 1 4 / 1 0 15/7 minute [1] 3/7 1 7 /6 1 7 /81 6 / 1 1 1 7 / 3 minutes [2] 3 / 3 10 / 7 on l y [4] 6/66/88/214/3i t ems [1] 15 / 8 moment [2] I I / 21 14/14 o r [ 17] 4 / 13 4 / 24 6 /12 6/12

    ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m o r e [4] 3/3 3 /3 7/4 11 / 9 8 / 4 10 / 4 10 / 10 11 / 2 12/17r- ~ ~ m o r n i n g [3] 3/16 3/17 3 / 19 1 3 /9 13 / 18 13 / 25 14 / 5 14/1judge [16] 1/186/167/97/21 motion [13] 3 / 2 5 4 / 1 0 4 / 1 1 1 4 / 1 9 1 4 / 2 3 1 6 / 1 4

    9/1 :I 0 / 15 11/1 7 1 2 /6 12 / 8 4/12 4 /16 4/18 4 /24 6 /14 9/15 o rd e r [1] 4 / fi13/4 13/14 15/1 15112 15119 10/8 12/15 14/18 15/1 '1 o th er [6] , I i 12 / 6 13 / 6 14/18/2 18/4 mot ions [1] 10/ '! I l , / l t I l I : ~ judges [2] 1 4 / 1 6 1 4 / 2 2 move [1] 16/l :: o t h e r ' s [1] 6 / ] ~ ~

    j u d i c i a l [6] 111 3 /6 4/17 4 /19 Mr. [18] 3 / 15 4 / l 5 / 20 7/6 o t he r wi se [1] B / H ~ ' i /7 l i / ~ 7/11 7/16 7/20 8/24 9/12 our [1] 3 /6

    ju ry [7] 111 3 11 / 4 11 / 6 11 /7 10/1 0 11/20 I I / 25 13 / 5 13 / 9 ou t [4] 5 / 3 13 /2 2 17 / 4 ] 7/111/13 11/15 14/11 13/10 13/13 13/18 14/4 o u t s e t [1] 8 / 18

    j u s t [14] 31184/86/227/1 Mr. Cook [4] 1 3 / 9 1 3 / 1 0 1 3 / 1 3 o u t s id e [1] 10/22(1/1 8 /1 7 1 0 / 9 10 / 13 10 / 25 13/18 over [ 8] 6 /5 6/7 8 /2 1 14 / 1811 /14 11 /2 1 13/21 14/12 17/12 Mr. Cook 's [1] 13 / 5 1 4 /20 14 /24 1 7 / 13 17/13K Mr. Gi l l e s p ie [2] 3 / 15 5 / 20 P

    r : tMr. Rodems [9] 4/1 7 / I I 7 / 16K-O-R-V-1-C-K [1] 6/1 7 /20 8/24 9/12 10/10 11/20 P.A [1] 1 /1 0Kids [2] 5 / 1 4 5 / 1 6 11125 page [2] 7 /1 3 q / 16knew [1] 5 / 1 7 Mr. Rodems' [1] 14 /4 page 3 [ 1] q / 1 t;know [8] 7 / 1 9/4 10 / 9 12 / 9 Mr. Rodems' s [1] -/ / 6 page 7 [ 1] 7 / J J1 3 / 4 1 3 / 1 0 1 7 / 2 1 1 7 / 2 3 much [2] 13/23 1 5 / 1 : ~ pa r ag r aph [1] 7 / 15

    FK:.::oc=r.:.-vc=i.:::c::..:k_'..[=-1 -]_ 6:..../.::;,1 ----tmust [1] 16/13 p a r t [6] 7/'1 7 /5 8/4 8 /4 15my [7] 3 / 6 4/9 7/2 7/11 13 / 11 16 / 11L 13/13 16/18 p a r t i e s [1] 10/18

    l a t e r [1] 14/21 myse l f [3] 6 / 1 0 1 3 / 2 2 1 4 / 2 2 p a s t [1] 7 /8l aughing [1] 17 /19 F N : . I . . . = = = - ~ . . . - - ' : : : ' : : : ' ' : : : ' ' ' ' ' = ' : ' ' ' ' : : ' : : ' ' - ' ' ; : ; ' ' : ' ' : ' ' ' ' ' : ; ; ' : : ' ' ' ' - - l [1]ause 1 0 /191aw.[2] 6/24 1 5 /6 r- ~ ~ ~ l a y i n g [1] 17 / 12lawsui t [1] 15 / 8 name [2] 4/4 5/1 payment [1] 1 3 /5lawyer [8] 1 6 / 4 1 6 / 5 1 7 / 3 17 / 6 narrow [1] 13/1 p e r f e c t l y [1] 14 / 23

    1 7 / 8 1 7 / 1 0 1 7 / 1 4 1 7 / 1 6 Nathanson [1] 5/25 p e r m i t t e d [1] 1 4 /6lawyers [1] 16/9 necessary [1] 12/17 p e rs o n a l [1] 6/11l e a s t [1] 16 / 13 n e c e s s i ty [1] 13 / 23 p e r t a i n [2] 3/21 3 /23l e f t [2] 7 / 1 1 8 / 1 need [3] 4 / 1 9 1 0 / 5 1 2 / 2 phone [2] 7 / 2 5 8 / 6l e g a l [3] 17/12 17/15 17 / 22 needed [2] 12/4 14 / 2 P i n e l l a s [4] '7/22 QIl 16/21l eg a l ly [2] 1 4 / 1 1 1 4 / 1 4 NEIL [2] 1/7 2 /3 16 / 22l e t [2] 1 0 /9 17/14 never [1] 13/11 p l a c e [1] 16 / 18let's [1] 4/7 new [2] 3/19 l l l l p la c e d [2] 7 / 11 11/13l e t t e r [1] n 11 newspaper [1] 16 / 19 P l a i n t i f f [2] 11 8 2/7.l i k e [6] ~ ) / 1 3 10 / 23 1 1 /9 12 / 2 nex t [1] 16/18 plaintiff's [1] 4 / 9

    14/8 14 / 18 n i ce [1] 15/18 p lease [1] 4121list [1] 13/11 n i ne [1] 10 / 4 p o i n t [4] 6/4 11/23 1 2 l 4l i t i g a t i o n [1] 15 / 22 no [4] 1 / 8 3/24 14/15 15/23 12 / 21little [2] 3/14 6 /22 nobody [1] 3/4 p o l i t i c a l [3] 4 / 15 5 / 5 13/1long [1] 9/24 none [2] 6/11 15 / 5 p r eced i ng [1] 6 / 7look [2] 3 / 20 5 /2 nonjury [1] 11/2 p re ju d i ce [1] 8 / 15l ooking [2] 6 / 2 0 1 6 / 9 normal ly [1] 11/13 p res id e [1] 14 / 20

    ~ l : . : : o : . : : o . : . : k . : : : s - . . [ = - 1 - ] - . : : ; , 1 . : : ; , 1 : . . . . / . : : : 8 - - - - - - - - _ _ _ l N o r t h[1] 2/8 p res id in g [3] 8121 14/18 14M no t [14] 3121 3 / 23 4/11 4/15 p r e v a i l [1] b/"5 / 6 5 /12 6/20 U 5 J 11 n Pro [1] ;:: I rna' am [3] 3 / 11 IJ /2

  • 8/13/2019 TRANSCRIPT Judge Isom 9.06am Feb 01 2007 Conflict

    23/24

    Q s h o t s [1] 6/111------------------ . . sho uld [1] 9/12que s t i on [1] 6/24 s h o u l d n t [1] 11/16

    ~ l q ~ l u ~ e ~ s ~ t = i ~ o ~ n ~ s ~ [ ~ 1 ~ ] - ~ 1 ~ 5 ~ / = 2 - - - - - - ~ s i n c e [2] 4/14 13/2R s i t u a t i o n [2] 11/7 17 /17I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - i so [31]ran [2] 6/5 13/14 So .2 d [2] 5/23 6 /1ra nt [1] 8 / 1 s o c i a l [2] 13/8 13/18ra t her [2] 13 /23 17 / 4 solici t [1] 1 6/19read [2] 6 /20 13 /11 some [1] 7 /7r e a l [1] 11/22 somebody [2] 15/25 17 /5r e a l l y [3] 8/13 8/14 12/18 something [7] 3/18 4 /7 5/13reason [2] 9/13 12/12 10/16 11 /12 12/2 13/25r e a s s i g n e d [2] 12/11 12/13 sor r y [1] 8/8r e c a l l [1] 10/3 South [1] 5/3Recessed [1] 12/24 speak [1] 6/17reco rd [6] 5 /23 7/17 7 /18 7/19 s p e c i f i c [1] 15 /3

    13/2J. 19/13 s p e c i f i c a l l y [1] 17 /9red [2] 8/14 15/7 s p e c u l a t e [1] 11/21r e f e r e n c e [1] 7/14 s p e c u l a t i n g [1] 11/10r e f e r r a l [5] 16/4 16/5 16/17 s p e c u l a t i o n s [1] 12/16

    1 f / :2. \ 17 /25 s p i n [ 1] 12/19r e f e r r i n g [2] 8 / 6 8/24 s t a n d s [1] 5/4r e f l e c t [1] 13/22 s t a r t [1] 3/8reg a rd [1] 1512 STATE [2] 1/1 19/7r e l a t i n g [1] 15/3 s t e n o g r a p h i c a l l y [1] l q /11r e l a t i o n s h i p [3] 13 / 6 13/9 still [1] 13/24

    13/18 Stor e [2] 5/15 5 /16r e l e v a n t [5] 11/8 11 /15 11 /16 s t u f f [2] 14/9 14/16

    11 20 14/17 s u b j e c t [1] 15/13r e p o r t [1] 19/11 sugge s te d [1] 16/25REPORTED [1] 1 / 23 S u i t e [1] 2/8Reporter [2] 4/3 18/5 Super [2] 5/14 5/16r e p r e s e n t i n g [4] 13/22 16/1 suppo r t [1] 8/7

    17 / 11 17 / 14 supported [2] 4 /13 4 /25r e que s t [1] 4/14 suppress [1] 14/19r e s e a r c h [1] 6 /13 Supreme [1] 5 /19r e s e r v e d [1] 9/24 s u r e [3] 7/1 9/22 10/13

    th i nk [4] 5 /17 10/1715/25t h i n k s [1] 12 / 19THIRTEENTH [1] 1/1t h i s [3 7 ]t h o s e [2] 5 /11 15/9tho ug h [1 ] 10/17t ho usa nd [1] 16 /10t h r e e [3] 6/7 10/1 10/2thro ug h [3 ] 7/25 8 /5 9/21t i m e [7] 1/21 4 / 6 5/4 7 /20

    14 /16 17/4 17 / 6t o da y [9] 3 /22 3 /23 9/22 10

    10/8 12/2 13 /1 13/22 13/25t o d a y s [1] 12 /18tomorrow [1] 13 /25t o p i c [1] 6/2t o t a l [1] 9/25t o uch [ 1 ] 1 6/2Toys [3] 5 /12 5 /17 5/18t r a n s c r i p t [4] 1/16 8/21 14

    19 /12t r a n s c r i p t s [2] 10/23 14/10t r a n s f e r r e d [1] 12/7t r e a t [2] 4 /16 4/20tri l [7] 7n. }1 / 4 l J /3 I I i ~

    11 / 6 11 / 7 .1 II / 11t r i e d [1] 15/21t r u e [2 ] 6/14 1 9 /12t r y [2] 16/19 16/21t u r n [3] 4 / 6 7 / 1 0 7 /13t v o e [1] 5/7uUh [ 1 ] 13 /20Uh-huh [1] 13 /20u l t i m a t e l y [1] 6/5under [2 ] 4/17 4 /19

    r e s o l v e [1] 15/21 ~ s ~ u ~ s ~ p e ~ c ~ t ~ [ ~ 1 ~ ] _ 7 ~ / ~ 2 ~ _ ~ 1 ~ u n d e r s t a n d [1] 17/24r e s o l v e d [1] 10/17 T u n l e s s [1] 9/4r e s o l v i n g [1] 12/18 - - l u n s u c c e s s f u l l y [1] 13/14r e s u l t i n g [1] 17/15 t a b l e [1] 12/16 u n t i l [1] 12/24rev iew [2] 11 /24 12 / 1 .take [4] 3/3 4 / 8 12/22 17 / 8 up [3] 7 / 7 8 / 1 4 1 7 / 13rev iewing [1] 14 /13 ta ken [2] 1/19 6/11 upon [5] 6 /15 12/5 13/10 13r i g h t [10] 3 /10 3/12 5/22 6/16 Tampa [2] 1/20 2/8 14 /12

    10/6 12 /21 12 /25 14 /1 15 /15 t e l e p h o n e [2] 7 /8 8/9 u s [4] 5 /12 5 /17 5/18 6/111 /1 7 t e l e p h o n i c a l l y [1] 3/13 vRO EMS [13] 1 / 1 0 2 / 7 2/7 4/1 t e l e p h o n i c s [1] 12/237 / 1 1 7 / 1 6 7 / 2 0 8 / 2 4 9 / 1 0 9 / 1 2 t e n [1] 5/3 v e r i f i e d [2] 4 / 1 3 4 / 2 410 / ] 0 11 20 11 /25 terms [4] 12/1 12 /1 14 /21 v e r s u s [3] 5 / 1 4 6 / 1 9/9

    Rodems [1] 14 /4 17/22 v e r y [4] 6 /10 8/18 15/17 17Rodems ' s [ 1 ] 7 / 6 than [3] 3/3 3 /3 17 / 4 j - : v : . : i : : . : : e : . : w : . . . . . . . . J [ ~ 1 : . . . ] _ _ _ . . . : l o . . . : 4 ~ / : . . . . 7 : . . . -r u l e [ 4 ] 4 /14 4 /22 6/14 1 4 /20 Thank [10] 5/9 6/1 9 13 /1 9 15 /1 WRules [2] ,1/17 4 /19 15/15 15/17 15/19 18/ : ' 18/4run [2] 6/ 1 0 17 / 13 1 8 I wade [ 1 ] " / 2 ]

    f=R : :Y::: AN::: .=.1- ..]_=L.:..../....:.7 tha t [71] wai t [1] l / l. 4t h a t s [9] 3/13 3 /?4 5 /16 5 /23 want [13] 4/18 5/7 6/9 6 /1Js 7/13 14 /16 15 /13 15 /25 16/24 7 /1 8 /3 8 /17 10/13 10/20

    s a i d [6] 3/6 10/21 12/3 13/11 them [5] 4/8 10/24 10/25 12/1 10 /23 10/25 13/21 14/91'1 15/25 12/10 wanted [2] b /8 13/4

    sa y s [2] 7 / 1 6 7 / 2 1 t hemse lv es [1] 5/6 was [19] 4 / 1 2 4 / 1 2 5 / 1 7 6 / 5Se [1] 2 / 3 then [ 12 ] 3 / 9 4 / 13 4 /2 0 6 / 8 6 / 6 7 / 2 7 /11 8 /1 1 0 /1 7 I I /1sea rch [2] 14 /19 17 /22 6/14 7/23 8/10 10 /6 10/6 12/12 13 /1 13 / 5 17/8 17/9s eco nd [3] 7 / 15 7 / 16 10 /8 14/21 15/14 17/14 17/16 17/20 17 /20 19/10s e e [8] 11/8 11 /12 11/14 13/16 the r e [5] 3/14 10/3 14/1 17/4 w a s n t [2] 5/18 12/4

    ]4 /13 15/24 16 /8 18/3 17 /20 way [ 5 ] 4 /20 7 /1 0 8 /2 8/13s e n s i t i v e [1] 10 /16 t h e r e ' s [3 ] 3/4 5/2 8 /1 6 16 /20se nte nc e [1] 7/16 these [1] 15/8 we [1 3 ] 4 ! q -) /1 0 7 / l 9/71 Qs e r v i c e [5]7 12 16/5 16/17 t hey [7] 4 /8 1 2 /10 1 4 /17 1 4 / 1 7 1 0 / 6 ] 3 / 1 1 3 / R 1 3 8 13/17

    16/23 18/1 16/18 16/22 17/1 J4/20 14/21 s e r v i tude [1] 17/17 t h e y r e [ 2] 17 /11 1 7 ! l 2 w e ' l l [ 5 ] :3 / 8 3 9 3 1 511s e t [2] 4/8 10 /8 t h i n g [1] 13/1 1 ~ 2 4 s e t t i n g [1] 10/22 t h i n g s [3] 5/8 7 /7 10/21 We re [1] 12 !.I. 5s e v e r a l [2] 13 /2 16 /10 w e v e [ 2 ] 3 L 4 7 / 5

  • 8/13/2019 TRANSCRIPT Judge Isom 9.06am Feb 01 2007 Conflict

    24/24

    ww e b s ~ t e [1] 6 21welcome [1] 5 8w e l l [7] 10 20 11 14 11 24

    16 A 16 13 16 21 17 21Wells [1] 3 4went [1] 8 5were [3] 4 8 6 2 3 13 1what [ 18 ] 5 1 5 12 8 / 6 8 1 49 8 12 15 12 16 12 17 12 19

    13 1 13 4 13 6 13 10 14 21]6 /7 16 18 16 24 17 25

    w h a t s [ 2 ] 1 0 17 14 11whatever [1] 9 13when [3] 6 5 13 14 14 24whenever [1] 12 10where [3] 7 13 12 3 12 4whether [1] 14 /

    w h ~ c h [1 ] 3/7 4 12 4 24 b 16 2 7 G 8 24 9 5 10 24 15 5

    whole [1] 7 2why [1] 11 /10

    w ~ l l [1] 14 11WILLI M [1] 1 10

    w ~ t h o u t [2] 7 25 15 21words [ ] 12 / 6w o r k ~ n g [1] 13 24worth [1] 16 9would [17] 4 13 8 8 9 15 10 151U 16 10 16 11 8 11 12 11 12]1 14 13 23 14 3 14 6 14 10

    14 14 16 8 16 18wo uldn t [ 4] 9/4 1 4 5 1 6 / ] 417 14yyeah [3] 3/8 6 3 11 18y ea rs [4] 5 3 6 6 6 8 13 14Yes [1 ] 3 11 4 2 6 18 9 19

    12 9 15 12 15 12 16 15 16 2417 2

    you [61]y o u l l [1] 5 2y o u r e [5] S 8 7 23 9 20 11 22

    U / 2your [13] 3 /J6 4/4 5 / Q 6 21

    H 20 Ll 10 12 14 12 22 13 12l ~ J ~ 15 23 1 122

    yours [1] 3 / 8