Training of Master Trainers for SME-ICT project Implementation

Esther Mwiyeria (GESCI)9th – 10th Feb 2012

Esther.wachira@gesci.org

Ground Rules• Everyone participates. Everyone has been invited to contribute and has an opportunity to bring value to

the discussions through ideas, thoughts, opinions

• Different opinions are welcome and valued. We do not all have to agree and can learn from divergent thinking. Disagreement is an opportunity to learn more about an issue and ultimately make a wiser group decision.

• Silence is agreement• One conversation at a time - limit side conversations show respect for others by listening to

their point of view and refraining from side conversations.• Start on time; end on time. You will miss important dialogue and decisions and generally disrupt the

discussion. We should not be "punishing" the prompt by making them wait for the late-comers.

• Challenge ideas, not people. Focus on interests, not positions; separate people from the problem.

• Seek to understand others point of view by asking questions and explaining the reasoning behind someone’s opinion.

• Participate in a positive and constructive manner• Be concise and to the point with interventions to contribute to efficient time management• Stick to the agenda to achieve objectives, outputs and outcomes• No cell phones or email during the sessions unless they are being used as media.• Follow through on agreements.

Feedback on the online validation180 responses

Validation

• Clarity• Relevance• Scope

Clarity of Objectives

Clarity - Accuracy

Relevance

Relevance: Engaging content

Relevance: Promotion of Learning

Scope: Coverage & understanding

Scope – Coverage:

Scope: Is there something missing• The context domain is missing in the TPACK model • Technical skills• The competences could be listed to make them uniform• The reference materials were not enough• The resources should be separated from the modules so that it can be

easier to print and use in case of power downtimes• Tutors should be enabled with laptops• Open office is unfriendly and ambiguous and requires enough time to learn• More specific Math content• Skills to download picture interactive videos and animation• Some of the exercises are there already but for the rest, the facilitator will

have to develop.....however, if there are some missing things it will be better realized during T/L process

• The basic skills for producing multimedia content is very important and should be included in the topic to enhance the production and proper use of Video and Audio

Open discussion

• Collaboration in the zones– How have you achieved collaboration in your zone?– What has worked well?– What has not worked well?– Proposed solutions to challenges encountered

• Capacity building efforts for tutors• Priority topics in digital content resources • Digital resources identification – progress so far• Use of the WIKI space for collaboration

Lesson plans for effective ICT Integration in SME teaching

Esther MwiyeriaSME-ICT Project Coordinator

GESCI9th – 10th Feb 2012

Esther.wachira@gesci.org

Background

Meeting in Mpwapwa – 25th Nov 2011

Feedback on lesson evaluation

“..Although the graphics were attractive and support the content of the lesson with the

teacher helping the students use technology was to a good level, the use of technology to demonstrate complex ideas and to observe things that would otherwise be difficult to

visualize in life was at a minimum…”

Feedback on lesson evaluation• The use of technology to interact and collaborate with students• The ability of the teacher to adapt the use of technology to

different learning activities• Teachers use of technology-based tasks to engage students was

lacking• No opportunity for student collaboration during the learning

process• The teachers judgement on when to use or not to use

technology is largely lacking • However the use of references was limited • Technology was predominantly used to display images and not to

engage and involve students• Skills in teachers reflection should be revisited and enhanced

General Remarks• The teachers pedagogical approach was predominantly

leading (through lecturing and directing class activities)• Teacher used technology to present informationConclusion• The required skills are those related to:

– enhancing the lesson through technology use• using technology to enhance students involvement and

use technology to investigate and construct the meaning of complex ideas

Feedback on lesson evaluation

Review of the prepared technology integrated lesson plans and resources

Objectives of the session

• Develop lesson plans that integrate technology resources

• Develop one technology resource for use in lesson implementation

• Critically evaluate lesson plans and technology resources of peers

Group task

• Form pairs according to subjects– Chemistry– Physics– Biology– Mathematics– English

Resources

• Lesson plans developed at the zonal level in the different subjects

• Module 2• Internet ?

Task description

• Each subject team should take one lesson plan from the zones

• Go through the planned objectives, activities, resources and timeframes– Is there any indication on where the ICT resource will be

used in the lesson plan?– Has TPCK been integrated in the lesson plan

• What does the team like about the lesson plan and choice of resources

• Suggest improvements

Plenary

• Teams present their evaluation of the lesson plans and resources

• Teams discuss suggestions for improvement of lesson plans

Summary

• Feedback from the facilitators

Monitoring and Evaluation tools

Overview (tools)• Workshop processes

– General workshop evaluation tools – Teachers self assessment tool– E-diary– E-portifolio

• Application of ICT in SME Teaching– Classroom observation protocol – to be administered by the

visiting tutor

– Teacher self-reflection framework • Reflection on the lesson before teaching • Reflections on the Lesson after teaching

– Did the lesson differ from your expectations? – What do you think are the reasons for the way things happene– What would you do differently next time to make the lesson more

effective

Overview (tools)• Impact on students learning environment– Students questionnaire– Students ICT questionnaire

• School visits– Project team– Tutors– Inspectors

Teacher self-assessment tool(during workshop processes)

Tool 1• This is a questionnaire for measuring teacher

competency in applying technology, pedagogy and content knowledge (TPACK) in teaching and learning of Science, mathematics and English (SME) subjects.

• Who can use the tool: Tutors/teachers• When to use the tool: at the beginning of a

lesson/workshop

E-diary Tool 2• The e-diary is a teacher reflection tool that is

integrated into workshop activities. The tool is designed to encourage teachers to

a) reflect on past teaching experiences; b) reflect on the way they teach now; c) reflect on the way they experience the activities in the workshop module; d) reflect on change as they experiment with technology use in their classroom practice.

What is in the e-diary?• Before the activity–What do I understand about the new

Pedagogy in Science, Mathematics and English teaching:

• After the activity–What I have learnt from my group tasks about

the new pedagogies and constructivist approach for teaching Science, Mathematics and English

–What I feel about my progress so far

E-portifolioTool 3• The e-portfolio is a collection of documents and artefacts that can be

used for assessing/ monitoring the work produced by participants as they complete modules in each workshop programme.

• What for?– Teachers can use the e-portfolio to store and review all of the documents

and artifacts (PowerPoint presentations, lesson plans, concept maps etc) that they produce during the workshops.

– They can share their portfolio documents/ artifacts with other teachers in their schools when they return to their schools from the workshops.

– They can use their portfolio documents/ artifacts as a reference to retrieve and apply workshop ideas, concepts and artifacts (lesson plans/ group work activities etc) in classroom practice.

When will these be of use?

• The workshop facilitators should gather samples (photocopies) of teacher portfolios to demonstrate the quality of products that teachers have developed in workshop activities in March and subsequent trainings

• The school visit teams (college tutors, inspectors and national teams) can also gather samples of teacher portfolios as part of the school visit programme.

• National project management team will analyze the portfolio workshop/ school visit artifacts and include these assessments in monitoring and evaluation reports

Monitoring project outcomes

• Student Survey Questionnaire– To measure the initial impact of project activities on student

performance in relation to Cognitive (performance & Achievement), Affective (Attitudes & Disposition) and Psychomotor (Skills & Behaviors) domains. The focus is to continually improve all aspects of the project design and facilitation based on field observation and student feedback

• ICT Student Questionnaire – What Students think about Laptops in the Classroom

Level 5: Student learning Outcomes in Project Pilot Schools Tools: Student Questionnaires; School records examination results To be used by students

Level 4: Teacher Use of New Knowledge & Skills in Project Pilot Schools Tools: TPCK Observation Checklist; Teacher Reflection on Lesson Implementation; Teacher and Student artifacts To be used by tutors and teachers

Level 3: Organization Support & Change in Pilot Schools Tools: School Inspector Checklist ; School Visit Protocol for Zonal Teams; To be use by: College tutors. District Inspectors, National Team)

Level 2: Teacher Learning – Workshop capacity building & reflection workshops Tools: Teacher Self-Assessment ; Teacher workshop E-portfolios ; Teacher Workshop E-Diaries To be used by: Workshop participants

Level 1: Teacher Reaction - Workshop Capacity Building Tools: Teacher Workshop Evaluation – Offline (hard copy)/ online (survey monkey) To be used by: workshop facilitators

Overview of Monitoring and Evaluation Tools

Asante!