tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/doclib/ntra-may-benchmar… · 4 / 284 national...

286
1 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ة خدمات شب قياس جود نتائجقرير مختصر عن ت كاتول عن شهر مايو المحم2020 إصدار1 وليو ي2020

Upload: others

Post on 20-Jul-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

1 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020

كات تقرير مختصر عن نتائج قياس جودة خدمات شب2020المحمول عن شهر مايو

2020يوليو 1إصدار

Page 2: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

2 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020

" انفوجراف"رمس توضيحي الصوتيةدماتاخلملؤرشات جودة

٢٠٢٠مايواحملمول يف شهر

Page 3: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

3 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020

" انفوجراف"رمس توضيحي البياانت ملؤرشات جودة خدمات

٢٠٢٠مايواحملمول يف شهر

Page 4: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020

طاريف• خدماتجودةراقبةملالقويماملركزاليومأ صدرللمواطنني؛املقدمةالتصالتخدماتجودةحتسنيعيلال تصالتلتنظميالقويماجلهازحرصا

اجراءمتحيثمرص؛يفلعامةلاالتصالترشاكتمناملقدمةوالانرتنتالصوتخدماتودةجلمايوشهرقياساتلنتاجئتقريرهقويمالللجهازالتابعالتصالت

ىلواملقسمة،العربيةمرصمجهوريةيفابلساكناملأ هوةلاملناطقمنمرتكيلوالف26منيقربملاالشهرخاللاخلدمةجودةاختبارات مدينة81منيقربماا

جراءوالبياانتالصوتخلدماتالقياساتمتتحيثويح؛ ىلابل ضافةالاختباريةاملاكملاتمنالآلفمئاتاب .للمحمولياانتالب خدماتاختباراتا

:أ مههامنواليتادلوليةللمعايريوفقاالصوتيةاخلدماتجودةتقيمييمت•

oاملاكملةبدءعدممؤرش(Call block)الصوتيةاملاكملةبدءعىلالعميلقدرةعدمعنيعربوهو.

oاملاكملةانقطاعمؤرش(Call drop)الصوتيةاملاكملةاثناءاخلطانقطاععنيعربوهو.

oاملاكملةصوتجودةمؤرش(Voice quality)الصوتيةاملاكملةاثناءالصوتجودةمس توىمتوسطعنيعربوهو.

:أ مههاملعايريوفقاللمحمولالبياانتخدماتاختباراتجودةتقيميمتيفامي•

oانتالبياتزنيلرسعة(Download Throughput)للعميلالش بكةمناحملتوىتزنيلرسعةويه.

oالبياانتحتميلرسعة(Upload Throughput)الش بكةاىلالعميلمناحملتوىحتميلرسعةويه.

Page 5: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

5 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020

:الصوتيةاخلدماتجودة-

:مايوشهريفالصوتيةاخلدماتجودةيفمشألكمنتعايناهنارصدمتاليت(وأ حياءمدن)املناطقاعدادييلفامي

مرصأ مههامن،املاكملاتبدءعدممؤرشيفتأ ثرمنتعاينويحمدينة(8)عددرصدمتعلهيمالقياساختباراتاجراءمتويحمدينة(81)أ صلمن:فودافونرشكةل •

مدينه(7)عدداملاكملاتصوتجودهحيثومنمدينيت،القاهرةيفوأ مههاويحمدينه(1)عدداملاكملاتانقطاعأ وأ كامتلعدمحيثومن،القاهرةيفوالعباس يةاجلديدة

.الاسكندريةغربمناطقالاسكندريةيفوالرحابالقاهرةيفأ مههاويح

العبورأ مههامناملاكملات،بدءعدممؤرشيفتأ ثرمنتعاىنويحمدينة(22)عددرصدمتعلهيمالقياساختباراتاجراءمتويحمدينة(81)أ صلمن:اوراجنولرشكة•

حيثمنو ،مطروحىسومرالاسكندريةغربو رشقيفمناطق،ال سكندريةيفواجلزية،يفزايدوالش يخاكتوبرمنوالسادسالقاهرةيفوالساماجلديدةومرصوالرحاب

.الاسكندريةوغربرشقيفومناطقالقاهرةيفمشسعنيأ مههاويحمدينه(11)عدداملاكملاتصوتجوده

مدينيتأ مههامناملاكملات،بدءعدممؤرشيفتأ ثرمنتعاىنويحمدينة(20)عددرصدمتعلهيمالقياساختباراتاجراءمتويحمدينة(81)أ صلمن:اتصالتولرشكة•

والعبورمدينيتوأ مههاويحمدينه(6)عدداملاكملاتانقطاعأ وأ كامتلعدمحيثومنالشاميل،والساحلالقاهرةيفاملقطمواخلميةوشرباشربااملنيلونرصوومدينةوالعبور

.القاهرةيفواملنيل

مدينيتأ مههامناملاكملات،بدءعدممؤرشيفتأ ثرمنتعاىنويحمدينة(33)عددرصدمتعلهيمالقياساختباراتاجراءمتويحمدينة(81)أ صلمن:ويولرشكة•

سكندريةويفزايدالش يخاجلزيةويفالقاهرة،يفواملقطمواملعاديوحلواناخلميةوشرباوشرباوالعباس يةنرصومدينةوالرحابوالعبور سكندريةوغربرشقيفناطقم ال ال

.اجلزيةيففيصلأ مههاويحمدينه(5)عدداملاكملاتصوتجودهحيثمنو مدينيت،القاهرةيفوأ مههاويحمدينه(3)عدداملاكملاتانقطاعأ وأ كامتلعدمحيثومن،

Page 6: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

6 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020

:البياانتخدمةجودة-

51يفاوراجنلرشكةمتزيرصدمتامجلهوريةمس توىعىلقياسمنطقة81اجاميلمنأ نهالتفصييلالتقريرمنيتضحالبياانتتزنيللرسعةابلنس بة-

متوسطوبلغمنطقة22يفاتصالتلرشكةمتزيرصدمتبيامنالثانية،يفبيتميجا32امجلهوريةمس توىعىلاوراجنلرشكةالرسعةمتوسطوبلغمنطقة

لرشكةالرسعةمتوسطوبلغمناطق7يففودافونلرشكةمتزيرصدمتو،الثانيةيفبيتميجا28امجلهوريةمس توىعىلاتصالتلرشكةالرسعة

مس توىعىلويةلرشكالرسعةمتوسطوبلغواحدةمنطقةيفويلرشكةمتزيرصدمتو،الثانيةيفبيتميجا22امجلهوريةمس توىعىلفودافون

الثانيةيفبيتميجا24امجلهورية

طاريفالتقريرهذايأ يتو - للمس تخدمنياملرصيالسوقيفالتصالتش باكتمشغيلمناملقدمةاخلدماتجلودةالتصالتلتنظميالقويماجلهازمتابعةا

.اخلدماتهذهجودةمبؤرشاتاملس تخدمنيوعيورفع

:أ و سوء للخدمة حسب لك مشغل ومنطقة جغرافيةوفامي ييل قامئة ابملناطق اليت مت رصد هبا حتسن•

Page 7: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

7 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020

National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020

7 / 284

Page 8: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

8 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020

National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020

8 / 284

Page 9: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

9 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020

National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020

9 / 284

Page 10: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

10 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020

National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020

10 / 284

Page 11: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

11 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 202011

Benchmarking Report No. 11

MAY 2020

Page 12: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

AGENDA

1. Quantitative Information

2. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Cairo

3. Data Service Quality & Performance – Cairo

4. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Giza

5. Data Service Quality & Performance – Giza

6. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria

7. Data Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria

8. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Delta

9. Data Service Quality & Performance – Delta

10. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Canal

11. Data Service Quality & Performance – Canal

12. Voice Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt

13. Data Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt

14. Annexes

12 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Page 13: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

Executive Summary

Due to the fact that NTRA in Egypt is concerned about maintaining the highest standards of the quality of the

network and getting the market insight about how operators are performing in the market from a QoS/QoE

perspective. NTRA along with Rohde and Schwarz carried out an extensive benchmarking survey of the Mobile

networks in Egypt with focus on the performance of the four operator’s network.

The full scope of measurements performed covers Egypt on monthly basis. Measurement is divided over

seven main regions, Cairo, Giza, Alexandria, Delta, Canal, Red Sea and Upper Egypt. Each area is consisting

of some clusters that will be measured during each month. And the results of each month will be discussed on

this presentation.

This presentation gives a summary view of May-20 measurements that took place in May 2020 for Egypt as

defined in later slides of this presentation, during this survey, a distance of ~ 26,000 KM’s were driven. All

measurements were done in Window time from 8AM to 8PM.

This presentation addressed 2nd, 3rd and 4th generation mobile networks (2G,3G,4G) for the Four licensees

Etisalat, Orange, Vodafone and WE (sorted alphabetically) in outdoors measurements. Key performance

indicators used in the survey are included in Annexes slides at the end of this presentation. For this campaign,

Mobile to Mobile voice scenario approach was followed to better represent customer experience in a

modernized manner.

13 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Page 14: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

Quantitative Information

Voice Measurements Number of Tests

Total Number of Voice Calls 63,532

14 / 284

Data Measurements Number of Tests

HTTP Download 68,115

HTTP Upload 68,038

HTTP Browsing - Facebook 67,855

HTTP Browsing – Twitter 67,671

HTTP Browsing – Google 67,971

HTTP Browsing – YouTube 67,901

HTTP Browsing – Yahoo 67,707

YouTube - Video Stream 67,428

Total Ping Attempts 3,434,159

National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Page 15: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

Methodology

NTRA has preformed drive test that cover all governorates and major highways across the country. The tests were in same time and condition for the four operators to ensure fair comparison.

NTRA measures the major “key performance indicators” (KPI) that directly relate to the public’s experience through Outdoor (in-car user experience). These include block, dropped calls, voice quality, data throughput. (all details will be found on annexes slides)

The drive test results represent a snapshot of the mobile service provider’s network in-car user experience and using a particular type of smartphones to simulate end user. The reported level of service quality may therefore not be exactly comparable with the consumer’s own experience;

The threshold for each KPI in license is mentioned in the legend of each graph. (and it is included in the annexes slides) For better understand the results in reference to the threshold value:

• Every result exceeds the threshold value is considered as a violation to the license terms for Voice KPI’s.

• Every result exceeds the threshold value is considered as a violation to the license terms for Data KPI’s except for Download Throughput and Upload throughput.

• Download Throughput and Upload throughput violation counted when the result is lower than the threshold value.

• We Denotes the violations where penalties are applied as dashed Dark RED Line

• We Denotes the violations where penalties are not applied as Solid Black Line

15 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Page 16: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

16 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 202016

Executive

Summary

Page 17: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

17 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 202017

2%

98%

Violated KPI's - Voice Violated KPI's - Data Non-violated KPIs

5% 1%

94%

Violated KPI's - Voice Violated KPI's - Data Non-violated KPIs

3%

97%

Violated KPI's - Voice Violated KPI's - Data Non-violated KPIs

6%

94%

Violated KPI's - Voice Violated KPI's - Data Non-violated KPIs

Licensed-KPI’s Violation Percentage over Egypt (32 zones * 8 KPIs in license = 256 possible violations)

Page 18: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

18 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 202018

75%

25%

Call blocked Rate MOS < 2.8

100%

Call blocked Rate

87%

13%

Call blocked Rate Call Dropped Rate

64%

22%

7%7%

Call blocked Rate MOS < 2.8 SBR DL SBR UL

Licensed-KPI’s Violation Percentage over Egypt

Page 19: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

19 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

Call Blocked Rate

Call Blocked Rate - Zones

19

Page 20: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

20 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Call Dropped Rate - Zones

20

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

Call Dropped Rate

2.61%

2.01%2.45%

2.44%

4.46%

2.17% 3.17%2.26%

3.28%

5.00%

2.11%

Page 21: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

21 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

CSFB Failure Rate - Zones

21

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

CSFB Failure Rate

Page 22: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

22 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Voice Speech Quality - Zones

22

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

Voice Speech Quality on Sample < 2.8

10.84%11.92%

10.36%

10.99%

11.11% 10.89%

10.52%13.03%

10.12%

11.65%

10.78% 11.59%

11.06%

10.50% 14.02%

10.72% 12.24%

16.41%

11.19% 25.84%10.81%

12.29%

12.93%

12.14%

15.45%

13.67%

Page 23: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

23 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Download Throughput [kbps] - Zones

23

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

40,000

45,000

50,000

55,000

HTTP Download Throughput [kbps]

Page 24: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

24 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Upload Throughput [kbps] - Zones

24

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

HTTP Upload Throughput [kbps]

Page 25: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

25 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Download Session Blocked Ratio - Zones

25

0%

5%

10%

15%

Download Session Block Ratio

Page 26: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

26 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Upload Session Blocked Ratio - Zones

26

0%

5%

10%

15%

Upload Session Failure Ratio

Page 27: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

27 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Download Session Setup Time - Zones

27

0

2

4

6

8

10

Download Session Setup Time [sec]

Page 28: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

28 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Upload Session Setup Time - Zones

28

0

2

4

6

8

10

Upload Session Setup Time [sec]

Page 29: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

AGENDA

1. Quantitative Information

2. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Cairo

3. Data Service Quality & Performance – Cairo

4. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Giza

5. Data Service Quality & Performance – Giza

6. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria

7. Data Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria

8. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Delta

9. Data Service Quality & Performance – Delta

10. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Canal

11. Data Service Quality & Performance – Canal

12. Voice Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt

13. Data Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt

14. Annexes

29 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Page 30: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

30 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Zones Definition

30

Cairo

Cair

o Z

1

Madinity

Obour

Rehab

Sherouk

Tagamoaa

Cair

o Z

2 Heliopolis 1

Heliopolis 2

Nasr City 1

Nasr City 2

Cair

o Z

3

Ain Shams

ElMarg

ElSalam

Qobba Gardens

Cair

o Z

4

Abbasia

AlManyal

Shobra

Shobra ElKhamia

Zamalek

Cair

o Z

5 Helwan 1

Helwan 2

Maadi

Mokattam

Page 31: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

31 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 202031

Voice

Service

KPI’s

Page 32: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

32 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

2/3/4G: Short CallAccessibility: Call Blocked Rate

32

Call Blocked Rate represents the ratio between unsuccessful call attempts and all calls made (both successful & unsuccessful).

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5

Call Blocked Rate - Zones

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

Madinity_Badr Obour Rehab Sherouk -Madinet elMostkbal

Tagamoaa Heliopolis 1 Heliopolis 2 Nasr 1 Nasr 2 Ain Shams El Marg El Salam Qobba Gardens Abbasia AlManyal Shobra Shobra ElKhamia Zamalek_DownTown

Helwan 1 Helwan 2 Maadi Mokattam

Call Blocked Rate

2.30%

1.32%

1.12%

0.89%

0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5%

Call Blocked Rate - Overall

Page 33: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

33 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Retainability: Call Dropped Rate

33

Voice Call Retainability is represented by call drop rates.

0.63%

0.78%

0.15%

0.55%

0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5%

Voice Call Droped Rate - Overall

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

Madinity_Badr Obour Rehab Sherouk -Madinet elMostkbal

Tagamoaa Heliopolis 1 Heliopolis 2 Nasr 1 Nasr 2 Ain Shams El Marg El Salam Qobba Gardens Abbasia AlManyal Shobra Shobra ElKhamia Zamalek_DownTown

Helwan 1 Helwan 2 Maadi Mokattam

Voice Call Droped Rate

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5

Voice Call Droped Rate - Zones

2/3/4G: Short Call

Page 34: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

34 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Accessibility: CSFB Failure Rate [%]

34

0.02%

0.00%

0.00%

0.02%

0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5%

CSFB Failure Rate - Overall

CSFB Failure Rate represents the ratio between unsuccessful fall back attempt to lower technology than 4G (LTE) and all calls made (both successful &

unsuccessful). When there is 4G (LTE) present before starting the session.

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

Madinity_Badr Obour Rehab Sherouk -Madinet elMostkbal

Tagamoaa Heliopolis 1 Heliopolis 2 Nasr 1 Nasr 2 Ain Shams El Marg El Salam Qobba Gardens Abbasia AlManyal Shobra Shobra ElKhamia Zamalek_DownTown

Helwan 1 Helwan 2 Maadi Mokattam

CSFB Failure Rate

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5

CSFB Failure Rate - Zones

2/3/4G: Short Call

Page 35: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

35 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Speech Quality: MOS Voice Speech Quality < 2.8

35

3.95%

3.24%

4.89%

4.34%

0% 10% 20%

Voice Speech Quality on Sample < 2.8 - Overall

MOS Voice Speech Quality < 2.8 represents the ratio between total number of MOS samples less than 2.8 all collected MOS samples

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

Madinity_Badr Obour Rehab Sherouk -Madinet elMostkbal

Tagamoaa Heliopolis 1 Heliopolis 2 Nasr 1 Nasr 2 Ain Shams El Marg El Salam Qobba Gardens Abbasia AlManyal Shobra Shobra ElKhamia Zamalek_DownTown

Helwan 1 Helwan 2 Maadi Mokattam

Voice Speech Quality on Sample < 2.8

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5

Voice Speech Quality on Sample < 2.8 - Zones

2/3/4G: Short Call

Page 36: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

36 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Accessibility: Call Access Time [sec.]

36

Call Access Time represents the period of time elapsed from the sending of a complete destination address (target number) to the setting up of a call to

the receiving terminal.

0

5

10

15

Madinity_Badr Obour Rehab Sherouk -Madinet elMostkbal

Tagamoaa Heliopolis 1 Heliopolis 2 Nasr 1 Nasr 2 Ain Shams El Marg El Salam Qobba Gardens Abbasia AlManyal Shobra Shobra ElKhamia Zamalek_DownTown

Helwan 1 Helwan 2 Maadi Mokattam

Call Access Time

0

5

10

15

Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5

Call Access Time - Zones

10.00

9.56

7.60

6.66

0 5 10 15

Call Access Time - Overall

2/3/4G: Short Call

Page 37: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

37 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Accessibility: CSFB Delay [sec.]

37

CSFB Delay represents the period of time to overlay 3G/2G environment instead of handling calls in 4G (LTE). Depending on the CSFB strategy.

0

1

2

3

4

5

Madinity_Badr Obour Rehab Sherouk -Madinet elMostkbal

Tagamoaa Heliopolis 1 Heliopolis 2 Nasr 1 Nasr 2 Ain Shams El Marg El Salam Qobba Gardens Abbasia AlManyal Shobra Shobra ElKhamia Zamalek_DownTown

Helwan 1 Helwan 2 Maadi Mokattam

Circuit Switch Fall Back Delay

0

1

2

3

4

5

Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5

Circuit Switch Fall Back Delay - Zones

0.87

0.83

0.84

0.67

0 1 2 3 4 5

Circuit Switch Fall Back Delay - Overall

2/3/4G: Short Call

Page 38: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

38 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Accessibility: Telephony Return Delay [sec.]

38

Telephony Return Delay measures the time that a UE uses to re-join the LTE (4G) network after call end

0

1

2

3

4

5

Madinity_Badr Obour Rehab Sherouk -Madinet elMostkbal

Tagamoaa Heliopolis 1 Heliopolis 2 Nasr 1 Nasr 2 Ain Shams El Marg El Salam Qobba Gardens Abbasia AlManyal Shobra Shobra ElKhamia Zamalek_DownTown

Helwan 1 Helwan 2 Maadi Mokattam

Telephony Return Delay

0

1

2

3

4

5

Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5

Telephony Return Delay - Zones

0.61

0.59

0.78

0.71

0 1 2 3 4 5

Telephony Return Delay - Overall

2/3/4G: Short Call

Page 39: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

39 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 202039

Voice

Speech

Quality

KPI’s

Page 40: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

40 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Speech Quality: MOS Scores

40

0

1

2

3

4

5

Madinity_Badr Obour Rehab Sherouk -Madinet elMostkbal

Tagamoaa Heliopolis 1 Heliopolis 2 Nasr 1 Nasr 2 Ain Shams El Marg El Salam Qobba Gardens Abbasia AlManyal Shobra Shobra ElKhamia Zamalek_DownTown

Helwan 1 Helwan 2 Maadi Mokattam

Voice Speech Quality

0

1

2

3

4

5

Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5

Voice Speech Quality - Zones

3.39

3.42

3.41

3.41

0 1 2 3 4 5

Voice Speech Quality - Overall

Page 41: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

41 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Speech Quality: Call technology Usage & Codec Base Usage

41

Call technology Usage represents the call technology

used over call period. The more calls on 3G (UMTS) the

better MOS served.

Codec Base Usage represents the codec used over the call where AMR

wideband (AMR WB) leads to better voice quality experience by the end

user than the AMR Narrowband (AMR NB)

99%

99%

100%

98%

1%

1%

0%

2%

0% 25% 50% 75% 100%

We

Etisalat

Orange

Vodafone

Call Technology Usage Overall

3G

2G

0.10%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

AMR NarrowBand

AMR WideBand

EFR

Codec Base Usage

Page 42: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

42 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 202042

Failed &

Dropped

Calls

Causes

Page 43: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

43 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Analysis: Dropped Calls Causes

43

16%3%

38%6%

9%

28% 2G Quality

3G Coverage

3G Quality

Core Network

Mobility Issue

RAN Issue

34%

22%

22%

22%

2G Quality

3G Quality

Core Network

RAN Issue

7%

33%

2%

2%

56%

2G Quality

3G Quality

Core Network

Mobility Issue

RAN Issue

3%

28%

8%

5%

56%

2G Quality

3G Quality

Core Network

Mobility Issue

RAN Issue

Page 44: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

44 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

All Operators: Dropped Calls Locations 1/2

44

Page 45: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

45 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

All Operators: Dropped Calls Locations 2/2

45

Page 46: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

46 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Analysis: Failed Calls Causes

21%

2%

4%

12%

12%

17%

2%

2%

29%

3G Quality

4G Coverage

Core Network

CSFB Issue

Mobility Issue

No service

Other

Paging Issue

RAN Issue

1%

8%11%

1%

14%

18%

47%

3G Coverage

3G Quality

4G Quality

Core Network

CSFB Issue

Mobility Issue

RAN Issue

13%

1%

13%

3%

23%

8%

5%

1%

9%

23%

3G Quality

4G Coverage

4G Quality

Core Network

CSFB Issue

Mobility Issue

No service

Other

Paging Issue

RAN Issue

0.7%

1%

10%

1%

13%

4%

14%

9%5%2%2%

38%

2G Quality

3G Coverage

3G Quality

4G Coverage

4G Quality

Core Network

CSFB Issue

Mobility Issue

No service

Other

Paging Issue

Page 47: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

47 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

All Operators: Blocked Calls Locations 1/2

47

Page 48: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

48 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

All Operators: Blocked Calls Locations 2/2

48

Page 49: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

AGENDA

1. Quantitative Information

2. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Cairo

3. Data Service Quality & Performance – Cairo

4. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Giza

5. Data Service Quality & Performance – Giza

6. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria

7. Data Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria

8. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Delta

9. Data Service Quality & Performance – Delta

10. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Canal

11. Data Service Quality & Performance – Canal

12. Voice Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt

13. Data Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt

14. Annexes

49 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Page 50: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

50 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 202050

Data

Service

KPI’s

Page 51: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

51 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Free Mode Throughput Per Test Type

51

NETWORK PERFORMANCE TEST USER EXPERIENCE TEST

-

20,000

40,000

60,000

80,000

100,000

120,000

140,000

-

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

20 sec Continuous Download(400 MB file)

15 sec Continuous Upload(200 MB file)

20 MB File Download 2 MB File Upload

Max

imu

m t

hro

ugh

pu

t

Ave

rage

th

rou

ghp

ut

Vodafone Orange Etisalat We Vodafone Max Orange Max Etisalat Max We Max

Page 52: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

52 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

FDTT HTTP Download Transfer Throughput – Network Performance

25875

26871

32235

21940

0 2,500 5,000 7,500 10,000 12,500 15,000 17,500 20,000 22,500 25,000 27,500 30,000 32,500 35,000

400 MB File FDTT HTTP Download [kbps] - Overall

0

2,500

5,000

7,500

10,000

12,500

15,000

17,500

20,000

22,500

25,000

27,500

30,000

32,500

35,000

37,500

40,000

42,500

45,000

Madinity_Badr Obour Rehab Sherouk -Madinet elMostkbal

Tagamoaa Heliopolis 1 Heliopolis 2 Nasr 1 Nasr 2 Ain Shams El Marg El Salam Qobba Gardens Abbasia AlManyal Shobra ShobraElKhamia

Zamalek_DownTown

Helwan 1 Helwan 2 Maadi Mokattam

400 MB File FDTT HTTP Download Throughput [kbps]

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

40,000

Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5

400 MB File FDTT HTTP Download Throughput [kbps] - Zones

Page 53: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

53 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

FDTT HTTP Upload Transfer Throughput – Network Performance

14233

20487

24114

10088

0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000

200 MB FDTT HTTP Upload Throughput [kbps] - Overall

01,5003,0004,5006,0007,5009,000

10,50012,00013,50015,00016,50018,00019,50021,00022,50024,00025,50027,00028,50030,00031,50033,00034,50036,000

Madinity_Badr Obour Rehab Sherouk -Madinet elMostkbal

Tagamoaa Heliopolis 1 Heliopolis 2 Nasr 1 Nasr 2 Ain Shams El Marg El Salam Qobba Gardens Abbasia AlManyal Shobra ShobraElKhamia

Zamalek_DownTown

Helwan 1 Helwan 2 Maadi Mokattam

200 MB FDTT HTTP Upload Throughput [kbps]

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5

200 MB FDTT HTTP Upload Throughput [kbps] - Zones

Page 54: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

54 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

HTTP Download Session Blocked Rates

0.20%

0.13%

0.27%

0.17%

0% 5% 10%

Download Session Blocked Ratio - Overall

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

Madinity_Badr Obour Rehab Sherouk -Madinet elMostkbal

Tagamoaa Heliopolis 1 Heliopolis 2 Nasr 1 Nasr 2 Ain Shams El Marg El Salam Qobba Gardens Abbasia AlManyal Shobra Shobra ElKhamia Zamalek_DownTown

Helwan 1 Helwan 2 Maadi Mokattam

Download Session Blocked Ratio

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5

Download Session Blocked Ratio - Zones

Page 55: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

55 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

HTTP Upload Session Blocked Rates

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5

Upload Session Blocked Ratio - Zones

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

Madinity_Badr Obour Rehab Sherouk -Madinet elMostkbal

Tagamoaa Heliopolis 1 Heliopolis 2 Nasr 1 Nasr 2 Ain Shams El Marg El Salam Qobba Gardens Abbasia AlManyal Shobra Shobra ElKhamia Zamalek_DownTown

Helwan 1 Helwan 2 Maadi Mokattam

Upload Session Blocked Ratio

0.35%

0.93%

0.04%

0.17%

0% 5% 10%

Upload Session Blocked Ratio - Overall

Page 56: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

56 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

HTTP Download Average Session Setup Time

0.13

0.16

0.12

0.16

0 2 4 6 8 10

Average Session Setup Time [sec] - Overall

0

2

4

6

8

10

Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5

Average Session Setup Time [sec] - Zones

0

2

4

6

8

10

Madinity_Badr Obour Rehab Sherouk -Madinet elMostkbal

Tagamoaa Heliopolis 1 Heliopolis 2 Nasr 1 Nasr 2 Ain Shams El Marg El Salam Qobba Gardens Abbasia AlManyal Shobra Shobra ElKhamia Zamalek_DownTown

Helwan 1 Helwan 2 Maadi Mokattam

Average Session Setup Time [sec]

Page 57: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

57 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

HTTP Upload Average Session Setup Time

0

2

4

6

8

10

Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5

Average Session Setup Time [sec] - Zones

0

2

4

6

8

10

Madinity_Badr Obour Rehab Sherouk -Madinet elMostkbal

Tagamoaa Heliopolis 1 Heliopolis 2 Nasr 1 Nasr 2 Ain Shams El Marg El Salam Qobba Gardens Abbasia AlManyal Shobra Shobra ElKhamia Zamalek_DownTown

Helwan 1 Helwan 2 Maadi Mokattam

Average Session Setup Time [sec]

0.10

0.11

0.04

0.05

0 2 4 6 8 10

Average Session Setup Time [sec] - Overall

Page 58: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

58 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 202058

Throughput

KPI’s Customer

Experience

Page 59: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

59 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

HTTP Download Throughput – Customer Experience

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

40,000

Madinity_Badr Obour Rehab Sherouk -Madinet elMostkbal

Tagamoaa Heliopolis 1 Heliopolis 2 Nasr 1 Nasr 2 Ain Shams El Marg El Salam Qobba Gardens Abbasia AlManyal Shobra ShobraElKhamia

Zamalek_DownTown

Helwan 1 Helwan 2 Maadi Mokattam

20MB Download Throughput [kbps]

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5

20MB Download Throughput [kbps] - Zones

24,370

27,202

30,953

21,355

0 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000

20MB Download Throughput [kbps] - Overall

Page 60: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

60 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

HTTP Upload Throughput – Customer Experience

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

Madinity_Badr Obour Rehab Sherouk -Madinet elMostkbal

Tagamoaa Heliopolis 1 Heliopolis 2 Nasr 1 Nasr 2 Ain Shams El Marg El Salam Qobba Gardens Abbasia AlManyal Shobra ShobraElKhamia

Zamalek_DownTown

Helwan 1 Helwan 2 Maadi Mokattam

2MB Upload Throughput [kbps]

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5

2MB Upload Throughput [kbps] - Zones

8,539

11,178

11,618

4,350

0 5,000 10,000 15,000

2MB Upload Throughput [kbps] - Overall

Page 61: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

61 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 202061

Browsing

& YouTube

Service

KPI’s

Page 62: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

62 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Session Failure Ratio

62

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

Madinity_Badr Obour Rehab Sherouk -Madinet elMostkbal

Tagamoaa Heliopolis 1 Heliopolis 2 Nasr 1 Nasr 2 Ain Shams El Marg El Salam Qobba Gardens Abbasia AlManyal Shobra Shobra ElKhamia Zamalek_DownTown

Helwan 1 Helwan 2 Maadi Mokattam

Session Failure Ratio

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5

Session Failure Ratio - Zones

0.54%

0.40%

0.07%

0.33%

0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5%

Session Failure Ratio - Overall

Page 63: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

63 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Session Time

63

0

2

4

6

8

10

Madinity_Badr Obour Rehab Sherouk -Madinet elMostkbal

Tagamoaa Heliopolis 1 Heliopolis 2 Nasr 1 Nasr 2 Ain Shams El Marg El Salam Qobba Gardens Abbasia AlManyal Shobra Shobra ElKhamia Zamalek_DownTown

Helwan 1 Helwan 2 Maadi Mokattam

Average Session Time

0

2

4

6

8

10

Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5

Average Session Time - Zones

3.34

4.56

3.66

3.98

0 2 4 6 8 10

Average Session Time - Overall

Page 64: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

64 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Session Failure Ratio

64

0%

5%

10%

Madinity_Badr Obour Rehab Sherouk -Madinet elMostkbal

Tagamoaa Heliopolis 1 Heliopolis 2 Nasr 1 Nasr 2 Ain Shams El Marg El Salam Qobba Gardens Abbasia AlManyal Shobra Shobra ElKhamia Zamalek_DownTown

Helwan 1 Helwan 2 Maadi Mokattam

Session Failure Ratio

0%

5%

10%

Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5

Session Failure Ratio - Zones

0.49%

0.22%

0.04%

0.19%

0% 5% 10%

Session Failure Ratio - Overall

Page 65: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

65 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Session Time

65

0

2

4

6

8

10

Madinity_Badr Obour Rehab Sherouk -Madinet elMostkbal

Tagamoaa Heliopolis 1 Heliopolis 2 Nasr 1 Nasr 2 Ain Shams El Marg El Salam Qobba Gardens Abbasia AlManyal Shobra Shobra ElKhamia Zamalek_DownTown

Helwan 1 Helwan 2 Maadi Mokattam

Average Session Time

0

2

4

6

8

10

Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5

Average Session Time - Zones

1.89

2.18

1.84

2.08

0 2 4 6 8 10

Average Session Time - Overall

Page 66: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

66 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Session Failure Ratio

66

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

Madinity_Badr Obour Rehab Sherouk -Madinet elMostkbal

Tagamoaa Heliopolis 1 Heliopolis 2 Nasr 1 Nasr 2 Ain Shams El Marg El Salam Qobba Gardens Abbasia AlManyal Shobra Shobra ElKhamia Zamalek_DownTown

Helwan 1 Helwan 2 Maadi Mokattam

YouTube Session Failure Ratio

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5

YouTube Session Failure Ratio - Zones

0.70%

0.29%

0.45%

0.65%

0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10%

YouTube Session Failure Ratio - Overall

Page 67: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

67 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Freezing Time [msec]

67

0

500

1,000

Madinity_Badr Obour Rehab Sherouk -Madinet elMostkbal

Tagamoaa Heliopolis 1 Heliopolis 2 Nasr 1 Nasr 2 Ain Shams El Marg El Salam Qobba Gardens Abbasia AlManyal Shobra ShobraElKhamia

Zamalek_DownTown

Helwan 1 Helwan 2 Maadi Mokattam

Freezing Time

0

100

200

300

400

Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5

Freezing Time - Zones

36

58

32

114

0 50 100 150

Freezing Time - Overall

Page 68: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

68 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Video Quality

68

0

1

2

3

4

5

Madinity_Badr Obour Rehab Sherouk -Madinet elMostkbal

Tagamoaa Heliopolis 1 Heliopolis 2 Nasr 1 Nasr 2 Ain Shams El Marg El Salam Qobba Gardens Abbasia AlManyal Shobra Shobra ElKhamia Zamalek_DownTown

Helwan 1 Helwan 2 Maadi Mokattam

Video Quality - VMOS

0

1

2

3

4

5

Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5

Video Quality [VMOS] - Zones

4.09

4.09

4.09

4.08

0 1 2 3 4 5

Video Quality [VMOS] - Overall

Page 69: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

69 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Time to 1st Picture

69

0

1

2

3

4

5

Madinity_Badr Obour Rehab Sherouk -Madinet elMostkbal

Tagamoaa Heliopolis 1 Heliopolis 2 Nasr 1 Nasr 2 Ain Shams El Marg El Salam Qobba Gardens Abbasia AlManyal Shobra Shobra ElKhamia Zamalek_DownTown

Helwan 1 Helwan 2 Maadi Mokattam

Time to First Picture [s]

0

1

2

3

4

5

Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5

Time to First Picture [s] - Zones

1.69

1.72

1.60

1.93

0 1 2 3 4 5

Time to First Picture [s] - Overall

Page 70: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

70 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Image Resolution

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

1088 720 480 360 240 144

Youtube - Image Resolution

Page 71: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

AGENDA

1. Quantitative Information

2. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Cairo

3. Data Service Quality & Performance – Cairo

4. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Giza

5. Data Service Quality & Performance – Giza

6. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria

7. Data Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria

8. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Delta

9. Data Service Quality & Performance – Delta

10. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Canal

11. Data Service Quality & Performance – Canal

12. Voice Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt

13. Data Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt

14. Annexes

71 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Page 72: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

72 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Zones Definition

72

Giza

Giz

a Z

1

Zayed 1

Zayed 2

6th of Oct 1

6th of Oct 2

Giz

a Z

2 Faisal

Haram

Giz

a Z

3 Embaba

Mohandseen

Page 73: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

73 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 202073

Voice

Service

KPI’s

Page 74: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

74 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Accessibility: Call Blocked Rate

74

Call Blocked Rate represents the ratio between unsuccessful call attempts and all calls made (both successful & unsuccessful).

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3

Call Blocked Rate - Zones

1.03%

0.69%

1.61%

0.55%

0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5%

Call Blocked Rate - Overall

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

6th of Oct 1 6th of Oct 2 Zayed 1 Zayed 2 Faisal Haram Embaba Mohandseen

Call Blocked Rate

2/3/4G: Short Call

Page 75: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

75 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Retainability: Call Dropped Rate

75

Voice Call Retainability is represented by call drop rates.

0.28%

0.37%

0.23%

0.28%

0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5%

Voice Call Droped Rate - Overall

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

6th of Oct 1 6th of Oct 2 Zayed 1 Zayed 2 Faisal Haram Embaba Mohandseen

Voice Call Droped Rate

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3

Voice Call Droped Rate - Zones

2/3/4G: Short Call

Page 76: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

76 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Accessibility: CSFB Failure Rate [%]

76

CSFB Failure Rate represents the ratio between unsuccessful fall back attempt to lower technology than 4G (LTE) and all calls made (both successful &

unsuccessful). When there is 4G (LTE) present before starting the session.

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5%

CSFB Failure Rate - Overall

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

6th of Oct 1 6th of Oct 2 Zayed 1 Zayed 2 Faisal Haram Embaba Mohandseen

CSFB Failure Rate

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3

CSFB Failure Rate - Zones

2/3/4G: Short Call

Page 77: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

77 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Speech Quality: MOS Voice Speech Quality < 2.8

77

MOS Voice Speech Quality < 2.8 represents the ratio between total number of MOS samples less than 2.8 all collected MOS samples

5.76%

3.33%

4.21%

3.49%

0% 5% 10%

Voice Speech Quality on Sample < 2.8 - Overall

0%

5%

10%

15%

6th of Oct 1 6th of Oct 2 Zayed 1 Zayed 2 Faisal Haram Embaba Mohandseen

Voice Speech Quality on Sample < 2.8

0%

5%

10%

Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3

Voice Speech Quality on Sample < 2.8 - Zones

2/3/4G: Short Call

Page 78: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

78 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Accessibility: Call Access Time [sec.]

78

Call Access represents the period of time elapsed from the sending of a complete destination address (target number) to the setting up of a call to the

receiving terminal.

0

5

10

15

6th of Oct 1 6th of Oct 2 Zayed 1 Zayed 2 Faisal Haram Embaba Mohandseen

Call Access Time

0

5

10

15

Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3

Call Access Time - Zones

8.89

7.84

7.67

6.62

0 5 10 15

Call Access Time - Overall

2/3/4G: Short Call

Page 79: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

79 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Accessibility: CSFB Delay [sec.]

79

CSFB Delay represents the period of time to overlay 3G/2G environment instead of handling calls in 4G (LTE). Depending on the CSFB strategy.

0

1

2

3

4

5

6th of Oct 1 6th of Oct 2 Zayed 1 Zayed 2 Faisal Haram Embaba Mohandseen

Circuit Switch Fall Back Delay

0

1

2

3

4

5

Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3

Circuit Switch Fall Back Delay - Zones

0.93

0.79

0.80

0.70

0 1 2 3 4 5

Circuit Switch Fall Back Delay - Overall

2/3/4G: Short Call

Page 80: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

80 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Accessibility: Telephony Return Delay [sec.]

80

Telephony Return Delay measures the time that a UE uses to re-join the LTE (4G) network after call end

0

1

2

3

4

5

6th of Oct 1 6th of Oct 2 Zayed 1 Zayed 2 Faisal Haram Embaba Mohandseen

Telephony Return Delay

0

1

2

3

4

5

Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3

Telephony Return Delay - Zones

0.68

0.62

0.81

0.69

0 1 2 3 4 5

Telephony Return Delay - Overall

2/3/4G: Short Call

Page 81: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

81 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 202081

Voice

Speech

Quality

KPI’s

Page 82: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

82 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Speech Quality: MOS Scores

82

0

1

2

3

4

5

6th of Oct 1 6th of Oct 2 Zayed 1 Zayed 2 Faisal Haram Embaba Mohandseen

Voice Speech Quality

0

1

2

3

4

5

Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3

Voice Speech Quality - Zones

3.39

3.55

3.42

3.40

0 1 2 3 4 5

Voice Speech Quality - Overall

Page 83: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

83 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Speech Quality: Call technology Usage & Codec Base Usage

83

Call technology Usage represents the call technology

used over call period. The more calls on 3G (UMTS) the

better MOS served.

Codec Base Usage represents the codec used over the call where AMR

wideband (AMR WB) leads to better voice quality experience by the end

user than the AMR Narrowband (AMR NB)

99%

99%

100%

100% 0%

0% 25% 50% 75% 100%

We

Etisalat

Orange

Vodafone

Call Technology Usage Overall

3G

2G

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

AMR NarrowBand

AMR WideBand

Codec Base Usage

Page 84: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

84 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 202084

Failed &

Dropped

Calls

Causes

Page 85: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

85 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Analysis: Dropped Calls Causes

85

34%

33%

33%

3G Quality

Core Network

RAN Issue80%

20%

3G Quality

RAN Issue

12%

50%

13%

25%

2G Quality

3G Quality

Core Network

RAN Issue

67%

16%

17%

3G Quality

Other

RAN Issue

Page 86: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

86 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

All Operators: Dropped Calls Locations 1/2

86

Page 87: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

87 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

All Operators: Dropped Calls Locations 2/2

87

Page 88: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

88 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Analysis: Failed Calls Causes

9%

8%

17%

8%

8%

50%

3G Coverage

4G Quality

CSFB Issue

No service

Other

RAN Issue

11%

23%

3%

17%

14%

3%

3%

26%

3G Coverage

3G Quality

4G Quality

CSFB Issue

Mobility Issue

No service

Other

RAN Issue

13%

7%

53%

7%

20%

3G Quality

4G Quality

CSFB Issue

Mobility Issue

RAN Issue

14% 4%

4%

32%

18%

5%

23%3G Quality

4G Quality

Core Network

CSFB Issue

Mobility Issue

Other

RAN Issue

Page 89: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

89 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

All Operators: Blocked Calls Locations 1/2

89

Page 90: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

90 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

All Operators: Blocked Calls Locations 2/2

90

Page 91: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

AGENDA

1. Quantitative Information

2. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Cairo

3. Data Service Quality & Performance – Cairo

4. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Giza

5. Data Service Quality & Performance – Giza

6. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria

7. Data Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria

8. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Delta

9. Data Service Quality & Performance – Delta

10. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Canal

11. Data Service Quality & Performance – Canal

12. Voice Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt

13. Data Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt

14. Annexes

91 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Page 92: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

92 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 202092

Data

Service

KPI’s

Page 93: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

93 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Free Mode Throughput Per Test Type

93

NETWORK PERFORMANCE TEST USER EXPERIENCE TEST

-

20,000

40,000

60,000

80,000

100,000

120,000

140,000

160,000

-

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

40,000

20 sec Continuous Download(400 MB file)

15 sec Continuous Upload(200 MB file)

20 MB File Download 2 MB File Upload

Max

imu

m t

hro

ugh

pu

t

Ave

rage

th

rou

ghp

ut

Vodafone Orange Etisalat We Vodafone Max Orange Max Etisalat Max We Max

Page 94: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

94 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

FDTT HTTP Download Transfer Throughput – Network Performance

25489

29309

36877

19207

0 2,500 5,000 7,500 10,000 12,500 15,000 17,500 20,000 22,500 25,000 27,500 30,000 32,500 35,000 37,500 40,000

400 MB File FDTT HTTP Download [kbps] - Overall

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

40,000

45,000

Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3

400 MB File FDTT HTTP Download Throughput [kbps] - Zones

02,5005,0007,500

10,00012,50015,00017,50020,00022,50025,00027,50030,00032,50035,00037,50040,00042,50045,00047,50050,000

6th of Oct 1 6th of Oct 2 Zayed 1 Zayed 2 Faisal Haram Embaba Mohandseen

400 MB File FDTT HTTP Download Throughput [kbps]

Page 95: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

95 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

FDTT HTTP Upload Transfer Throughput – Network Performance

13655

25673

27610

11538

0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000

200 MB FDTT HTTP Upload Throughput [kbps] - Overall

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3

200 MB FDTT HTTP Upload Throughput [kbps] - Zones

01,5003,0004,5006,0007,5009,000

10,50012,00013,50015,00016,50018,00019,50021,00022,50024,00025,50027,00028,50030,00031,50033,00034,50036,00037,50039,000

6th of Oct 1 6th of Oct 2 Zayed 1 Zayed 2 Faisal Haram Embaba Mohandseen

200 MB FDTT HTTP Upload Throughput [kbps]

Page 96: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

96 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

HTTP Download Session Blocked Rates

0.00%

0.22%

0.08%

0.17%

0% 5% 10%

Download Session Blocked Ratio - Overall

0%

5%

10%

6th of Oct 1 6th of Oct 2 Zayed 1 Zayed 2 Faisal Haram Embaba Mohandseen

Download Session Blocked Ratio

0%

5%

10%

Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3

Download Session Blocked Ratio - Zones

Page 97: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

97 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

HTTP Upload Session Blocked Rates

0.14%

0.40%

0.00%

0.09%

0% 5% 10%

Upload Session Blocked Ratio - Overall

0%

5%

10%

Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3

Upload Session Blocked Ratio - Zones

0%

5%

10%

6th of Oct 1 6th of Oct 2 Zayed 1 Zayed 2 Faisal Haram Embaba Mohandseen

Upload Session Blocked Ratio

Page 98: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

98 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

HTTP Download Average Session Setup Time

0.10

0.17

0.10

0.16

0 2 4 6 8 10

Average Session Setup Time [sec] - Overall

0

2

4

6

8

10

Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3

Average Session Setup Time [sec] - Zones

0

2

4

6

8

10

6th of Oct 1 6th of Oct 2 Zayed 1 Zayed 2 Faisal Haram Embaba Mohandseen

Average Session Setup Time [sec]

Page 99: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

99 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

HTTP Upload Average Session Setup Time [sec]

0

2

4

6

8

10

Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3

Average Session Setup Time [sec] - Zones

0

2

4

6

8

10

6th of Oct 1 6th of Oct 2 Zayed 1 Zayed 2 Faisal Haram Embaba Mohandseen

Average Session Setup Time [sec]

0.12

0.12

0.04

0.06

0 2 4 6 8 10

Average Session Setup Time [sec] - Overall

Page 100: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

100 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020100

Throughput

KPI’s Customer

Experience

Page 101: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

101 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

HTTP Download Throughput – Customer Experience

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

6th of Oct 1 6th of Oct 2 Zayed 1 Zayed 2 Faisal Haram Embaba Mohandseen

20MB Download Throughput [kbps]

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

40,000

Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3

20MB Download Throughput [kbps] - Zones

25,217

28,416

33,309

19,102

0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000

20MB Download Throughput [kbps] - Overall

Page 102: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

102 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

HTTP Upload Throughput – Customer Experience

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

6th of Oct 1 6th of Oct 2 Zayed 1 Zayed 2 Faisal Haram Embaba Mohandseen

2MB Upload Throughput [kbps]

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3

2MB Upload Throughput [kbps] - Zones

7,874

12,524

14,991

4,658

0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000

2MB Upload Throughput [kbps] - Overall

Page 103: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

103 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020103

Browsing

& YouTube

Service

KPI’s

Page 104: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

104 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Session Failure Ratio

104

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

6th of Oct 1 6th of Oct 2 Zayed 1 Zayed 2 Faisal Haram Embaba Mohandseen

Session Failure Ratio

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3

Session Failure Ratio - Zones

0.27%

0.49%

0.00%

0.13%

0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5%

Session Failure Ratio - Overall

Page 105: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

105 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Session Time

105

0

5

10

6th of Oct 1 6th of Oct 2 Zayed 1 Zayed 2 Faisal Haram Embaba Mohandseen

Average Session Time

0

5

10

Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3

Average Session Time - Zones

3.38

4.43

3.79

3.91

0 2 4 6 8 10

Average Session Time - Overall

Page 106: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

106 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Session Failure Ratio

106

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

6th of Oct 1 6th of Oct 2 Zayed 1 Zayed 2 Faisal Haram Embaba Mohandseen

Session Failure Ratio

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3

Session Failure Ratio - Zones

0.32%

0.31%

0.04%

0.04%

0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5%

Session Failure Ratio - Overall

Page 107: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

107 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Session Time

107

0

2

4

6

8

10

6th of Oct 1 6th of Oct 2 Zayed 1 Zayed 2 Faisal Haram Embaba Mohandseen

Average Session Time

0

2

4

6

8

10

Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3

Average Session Time - Zones

2.10

2.30

2.05

2.20

0 2 4 6 8 10

Average Session Time - Overall

Page 108: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

108 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Session Failure Ratio

108

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

6th of Oct 1 6th of Oct 2 Zayed 1 Zayed 2 Faisal Haram Embaba Mohandseen

YouTube Session Failure Ratio

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3

YouTube Session Failure Ratio - Zones

0.37%

0.49%

0.04%

0.04%

0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5%

YouTube Session Failure Ratio - Overall

Page 109: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

109 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Freezing Time [msec]

109

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

6th of Oct 1 6th of Oct 2 Zayed 1 Zayed 2 Faisal Haram Embaba Mohandseen

Freezing Time

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3

Freezing Time - Zones

30.46

33.80

27.33

74.89

0 50 100 150 200

Freezing Time - Overall

Page 110: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

110 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Video Quality

110

0

1

2

3

4

5

6th of Oct 1 6th of Oct 2 Zayed 1 Zayed 2 Faisal Haram Embaba Mohandseen

Video Quality - VMOS

0

1

2

3

4

5

Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3

Video Quality [VMOS] - Zones

4.09

4.09

4.10

4.09

0 1 2 3 4 5

Video Quality [VMOS] - Overall

Page 111: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

111 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Time to 1st Picture

111

0

1

2

3

4

5

6th of Oct 1 6th of Oct 2 Zayed 1 Zayed 2 Faisal Haram Embaba Mohandseen

Time to First Picture [s]

0

1

2

3

4

5

Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3

Time to First Picture [s] - Zones

1.69

1.67

1.58

1.83

0 1 2 3 4 5

Time to First Picture [s] - Overall

Page 112: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

112 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Image Resolution

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

1088 720 480 360 240 144

Youtube - Image Resolution

112

Page 113: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

AGENDA

1. Quantitative Information

2. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Cairo

3. Data Service Quality & Performance – Cairo

4. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Giza

5. Data Service Quality & Performance – Giza

6. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria

7. Data Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria

8. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Delta

9. Data Service Quality & Performance – Delta

10. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Canal

11. Data Service Quality & Performance – Canal

12. Voice Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt

13. Data Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt

14. Annexes

113 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Page 114: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

114 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Zones Definition

114

Alexandria

Ale

x Z

1

East1

East2

East3

East4

East5

Ale

x Z

2 West 1

West 2

Ale

x Z

3

Matrouh

Northencoast

Page 115: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

115 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020115

Voice

Service

KPI’s

Page 116: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

116 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Accessibility: Call Blocked Rate

116

Call Blocked Rate represents the ratio between unsuccessful call attempts and all calls made (both successful & unsuccessful).

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

East Alex West Alex Northen Coast

Call Blocked Rate - Zones

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

East1 East2 East3 East4 East5 West1 West2 Matrouh Northencoast

Call Blocked Rate

1.76%

0.51%

1.97%

0.51%

0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5%

Call Blocked Rate - Overall

2/3/4G: Short Call

Page 117: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

117 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Retainability: Call Dropped Rate

117

Voice Call Retainability is represented by call drop rates.

0.15%

0.37%

0.22%

0.37%

0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5%

Voice Call Droped Rate - Overall

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

East1 East2 East3 East4 East5 West1 West2 Matrouh Northencoast

Voice Call Droped Rate

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

East Alex West Alex Northen Coast

Voice Call Droped Rate - Zones

2/3/4G: Short Call

Page 118: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

118 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Accessibility: CSFB Failure Rate [%]

118

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5%

CSFB Failure Rate - Overall

CSFB Failure Rate represents the ratio between unsuccessful fall back attempt to lower technology than 4G (LTE) and all calls made (both successful &

unsuccessful). When there is 4G (LTE) present before starting the session.

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

East1 East2 East3 East4 East5 West1 West2 Matrouh Northencoast

CSFB Failure Rate

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

East Alex West Alex Northen Coast

CSFB Failure Rate - Zones

2/3/4G: Short Call

Page 119: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

119 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Speech Quality: MOS Voice Speech Quality < 2.8

119

4.51%

4.13%

9.52%

3.67%

0% 10% 20%

Voice Speech Quality on Sample < 2.8 - Overall

MOS Voice Speech Quality < 2.8 represents the ratio between total number of MOS samples less than 2.8 all collected MOS samples

0%

10%

20%

East1 East2 East3 East4 East5 West1 West2 Matrouh Northencoast

Voice Speech Quality on Sample < 2.8

0%

10%

20%

East Alex West Alex Northen Coast

Voice Speech Quality on Sample < 2.8 - Zones

2/3/4G: Short Call

Page 120: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

120 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Accessibility: Call Access Time [sec.]

120

Call Access Time represents the period of time elapsed from the sending of a complete destination address (target number) to the setting up of a call to

the receiving terminal.

0

5

10

15

East1 East2 East3 East4 East5 West1 West2 Matrouh Northencoast

Call Access Time

8.61

7.24

8.65

6.48

0 5 10 15

Call Access Time - Overall

0

5

10

15

East Alex West Alex Northen Coast

Call Access Time - Zones

2/3/4G: Short Call

Page 121: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

121 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Accessibility: CSFB Delay [sec.]

121

CSFB Delay represents the period of time to overlay 3G/2G environment instead of handling calls in 4G (LTE). Depending on the CSFB strategy.

0

1

2

3

4

5

East1 East2 East3 East4 East5 West1 West2 Matrouh Northencoast

Circuit Switch Fall Back Delay

0.76

0.64

0.98

0.66

0 1 2 3 4 5

Circuit Switch Fall Back Delay - Overall

0

1

2

3

4

5

East Alex West Alex Northen Coast

Circuit Switch Fall Back Delay - Zones

2/3/4G: Short Call

Page 122: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

122 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Accessibility: Telephony Return Delay [sec.]

122

Telephony Return Delay measures the time that a UE uses to re-join the LTE (4G) network after call end

0

1

2

3

4

5

East1 East2 East3 East4 East5 West1 West2 Matrouh Northencoast

Telephony Return Delay

0.69

0.66

1.03

0.74

0 1 2 3 4 5

Telephony Return Delay - Overall

0

1

2

3

4

5

East Alex West Alex Northen Coast

Telephony Return Delay - Zones

2/3/4G: Short Call

Page 123: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

123 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020123

Voice

Speech

Quality

KPI’s

Page 124: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

124 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Speech Quality: MOS Scores

124

0

1

2

3

4

5

East1 East2 East3 East4 East5 West1 West2 Matrouh Northencoast

Voice Speech Quality

3.41

3.53

3.33

3.41

0 1 2 3 4 5

Voice Speech Quality - Overall

0

1

2

3

4

5

East Alex West Alex Northen Coast

Voice Speech Quality - Zones

Page 125: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

125 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Speech Quality: Call technology Usage & Codec Base Usage

125

Call technology Usage represents the call technology

used over call period. The more calls on 3G (UMTS) the

better MOS served.

Codec Base Usage represents the codec used over the call where AMR

wideband (AMR WB) leads to better voice quality experience by the end

user than the AMR Narrowband (AMR NB)

99%

99%

98%

99%

1%

1%

2%

1%

0% 25% 50% 75% 100%

We

Etisalat

Orange

Vodafone

Call Technology Usage Overall

3G

2G

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

AMR NB

AMR WB

HR

Codec Base Usage

Page 126: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

126 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020126

Failed &

Dropped

Calls

Causes

Page 127: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

127 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Analysis: Dropped Calls Causes

127

20%

40%

20%

20%

2G Quality

3G Quality

Core Network

RAN Issue100%

3G Quality

40%

60% 3G Quality

RAN Issue

50%50%

3G Quality

Core Network

Page 128: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

128 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

All Operators: Dropped Calls Locations 1/2

128

Page 129: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

129 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

All Operators: Dropped Calls Locations 2/2

129

Page 130: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

130 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Analysis: Failed Calls Causes

14%

43%

29%

14%

3G Quality

Mobility Issue

No service

RAN Issue

4%

4%

4%

29%

11%

48%

3G Quality

4G Coverage

4G Quality

CSFB Issue

Mobility Issue

RAN Issue

14%

29%

43%

14%

3G Quality

CSFB Issue

No service

RAN Issue

4%

4%

9%

17%

29%

25%

4%8%

3G Quality

4G Coverage

Core Network

CSFB Issue

Mobility Issue

No service

Paging Issue

RAN Issue

Page 131: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

131 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

All Operators: Blocked Calls Locations 1/2

131

Page 132: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

132 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

All Operators: Blocked Calls Locations 2/2

132

Page 133: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

AGENDA

1. Quantitative Information

2. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Cairo

3. Data Service Quality & Performance – Cairo

4. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Giza

5. Data Service Quality & Performance – Giza

6. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria

7. Data Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria

8. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Delta

9. Data Service Quality & Performance – Delta

10. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Canal

11. Data Service Quality & Performance – Canal

12. Voice Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt

13. Data Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt

14. Annexes

133 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Page 134: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

134 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020134

Data

Service

KPI’s

Page 135: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

135 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Free Mode Throughput Per Test Type

135

NETWORK PERFORMANCE TEST USER EXPERIENCE TEST

-

20,000

40,000

60,000

80,000

100,000

120,000

140,000

160,000

180,000

200,000

220,000

-

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

40,000

20 sec Continuous Download(400 MB file)

15 sec Continuous Upload(200 MB file)

20 MB File Download 2 MB File Upload

Max

imu

m t

hro

ugh

pu

t

Ave

rage

th

rou

ghp

ut

Vodafone Orange Etisalat We Vodafone Max Orange Max Etisalat Max We Max

Page 136: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

136 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

FDTT HTTP Download Transfer Throughput – Network Performance

25353

36392

36602

31304

0 2,500 5,000 7,500 10,000 12,500 15,000 17,500 20,000 22,500 25,000 27,500 30,000 32,500 35,000 37,500 40,000

400 MB File FDTT HTTP Download [kbps] - Overall

05,000

10,00015,00020,00025,00030,00035,00040,00045,00050,00055,000

East Alex West Alex Northen Coast

400 MB File FDTT HTTP Download Throughput [kbps] - Zones

02,5005,0007,500

10,00012,50015,00017,50020,00022,50025,00027,50030,00032,50035,00037,50040,00042,50045,00047,50050,00052,50055,00057,50060,00062,50065,000

East1 East2 East3 East4 East5 West1 West2 Matrouh Northencoast

400 MB File FDTT HTTP Download Throughput [kbps]

Page 137: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

137 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

FDTT HTTP Upload Transfer Throughput – Network Performance

15908

23450

24503

11963

0 1,500 3,000 4,500 6,000 7,500 9,000 10,50012,00013,50015,00016,50018,00019,50021,00022,50024,00025,50027,000

200 MB FDTT HTTP Upload Throughput [kbps] - Overall

0

3,000

6,000

9,000

12,000

15,000

18,000

21,000

24,000

27,000

30,000

East Alex West Alex Northen Coast

200 MB FDTT HTTP Upload Throughput [kbps] - Zones

01,5003,0004,5006,0007,5009,000

10,50012,00013,50015,00016,50018,00019,50021,00022,50024,00025,50027,00028,50030,000

East1 East2 East3 East4 East5 West1 West2 Matrouh Northencoast

200 MB FDTT HTTP Upload Throughput [kbps]

Page 138: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

138 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

HTTP Download Session Blocked Rates

0.38%

0.96%

0.18%

0.32%

0% 5% 10%

Download Session Blocked Ratio - Overall

0%

5%

10%

East Alex West Alex Northen Coast

Download Session Blocked Ratio - Zones

0%

5%

10%

15%

East1 East2 East3 East4 East5 West1 West2 Matrouh Northencoast

Download Session Blocked Ratio

Page 139: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

139 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

HTTP Upload Session Blocked Rates

0%

5%

10%

East Alex West Alex Northen Coast

Upload Session Blocked Ratio - Zones

0%

5%

10%

15%

East1 East2 East3 East4 East5 West1 West2 Matrouh Northencoast

Upload Session Blocked Ratio

0.46%

0.89%

0.18%

0.26%

0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10%

Upload Session Blocked Ratio - Overall

Page 140: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

140 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

HTTP Download Average Session Setup Time

0.12

0.11

0.12

0.13

0 2 4 6 8 10

Average Session Setup Time [sec] - Overall

0

2

4

6

8

10

East Alex West Alex Northen Coast

Average Session Setup Time [sec] - Zones

0

2

4

6

8

10

East1 East2 East3 East4 East5 West1 West2 Matrouh Northencoast

Average Session Setup Time [sec]

Page 141: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

141 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

HTTP Upload Average Session Setup Time

0

2

4

6

8

10

East Alex West Alex Northen Coast

Average Session Setup Time [sec] - Zones

0

2

4

6

8

10

East1 East2 East3 East4 East5 West1 West2 Matrouh Northencoast

Average Session Setup Time [sec]

0.13

0.13

0.06

0.05

0 2 4 6 8 10

Average Session Setup Time [sec] - Overall

Page 142: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

142 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020142

Throughput

KPI’s Customer

Experience

Page 143: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

143 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

HTTP Download Throughput – Customer Experience

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

40,000

45,000

50,000

55,000

East1 East2 East3 East4 East5 West1 West2 Matrouh Northencoast

20MB Download Throughput [kbps]

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

40,000

45,000

50,000

East Alex West Alex Northen Coast

20MB Download Throughput [kbps] - Zones

25,604

34,281

34,706

29,256

0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 40,000

20MB Download Throughput [kbps] - Overall

Page 144: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

144 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

HTTP Upload Throughput – Customer Experience

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

East1 East2 East3 East4 East5 West1 West2 Matrouh Northencoast

2MB Upload Throughput [kbps]

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

East Alex West Alex Northen Coast

2MB Upload Throughput [kbps] - Zones

8,580

12,482

11,481

4,676

0 5,000 10,000 15,000

2MB Upload Throughput [kbps] - Overall

Page 145: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

145 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020145

Browsing

& YouTube

Service

KPI’s

Page 146: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

146 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Session Failure Ratio

146

0%

5%

10%

15%

East1 East2 East3 East4 East5 West1 West2 Matrouh Northencoast

Session Failure Ratio

0.54%

0.96%

0.25%

0.19%

0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5%

Session Failure Ratio - Overall

0%

5%

10%

East Alex West Alex Northen Coast

Session Failure Ratio - Zones

Page 147: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

147 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Session Time

147

0

5

10

15

East1 East2 East3 East4 East5 West1 West2 Matrouh Northencoast

Average Session Time

3.55

4.05

3.72

3.79

0 2 4 6 8 10

Average Session Time - Overall

0

2

4

6

8

10

East Alex West Alex Northen Coast

Average Session Time - Zones

Page 148: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

148 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Session Failure Ratio

148

0%

5%

10%

East1 East2 East3 East4 East5 West1 West2 Matrouh Northencoast

Session Failure Ratio

0.54%

1.16%

0.12%

0.19%

0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10%

Session Failure Ratio - Overall

0%

5%

10%

East Alex West Alex Northen Coast

Session Failure Ratio - Zones

Page 149: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

149 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Session Time

149

0

2

4

6

8

10

East1 East2 East3 East4 East5 West1 West2 Matrouh Northencoast

Average Session Time

2.04

2.05

1.89

1.97

0 2 4 6 8 10

Average Session Time - Overall

0

2

4

6

8

10

East Alex West Alex Northen Coast

Average Session Time - Zones

Page 150: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

150 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Session Failure Ratio

150

0%

5%

10%

East1 East2 East3 East4 East5 West1 West2 Matrouh Northencoast

YouTube Session Failure Ratio

1.46%

0.96%

0.37%

0.33%

0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10%

YouTube Session Failure Ratio - Overall

0%

5%

10%

East Alex West Alex Northen Coast

YouTube Session Failure Ratio - Zones

Page 151: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

151 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Freezing Time [msec]

151

0

50

100

150

200

250

East1 East2 East3 East4 East5 West1 West2 Matrouh Northencoast

Freezing Time

0

50

100

150

East Alex West Alex Northen Coast

Freezing Time - Zones

25

26

36

11

0 50 100 150 200

Freezing Time - Overall

Page 152: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

152 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Video Quality

152

0

1

2

3

4

5

East1 East2 East3 East4 East5 West1 West2 Matrouh Northencoast

Video Quality - VMOS

0

1

2

3

4

5

East Alex West Alex Northen Coast

Video Quality [VMOS] - Zones

4.08

4.08

4.09

4.10

0 1 2 3 4 5

Video Quality [VMOS] - Overall

Page 153: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

153 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Time to 1st Picture

153

0

1

2

3

4

5

East1 East2 East3 East4 East5 West1 West2 Matrouh Northencoast

Time to First Picture [s]

0

1

2

3

4

5

East Alex West Alex Northen Coast

Time to First Picture [s] - Zones

1.80

1.67

1.72

1.69

0 1 2 3 4 5

Time to First Picture [s] - Overall

Page 154: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

154 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Image Resolution

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

1088 720 480 360 240 144

Youtube - Image Resolution

154

Page 155: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

AGENDA

1. Quantitative Information

2. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Cairo

3. Data Service Quality & Performance – Cairo

4. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Giza

5. Data Service Quality & Performance – Giza

6. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria

7. Data Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria

8. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Delta

9. Data Service Quality & Performance – Delta

10. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Canal

11. Data Service Quality & Performance – Canal

12. Voice Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt

13. Data Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt

14. Annexes

155 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Page 156: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

156 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Zones Definition

156

Delta Cities

Delt

a Z

1 Banha

Qalyoub

Qanatir

Delt

a Z

2 10th of ramadan

Faqous

Zagazig

Delt

a Z

3 Damnhour

Kafr Eldawar

Delt

aZ

4 Kafr el Zayat

Tanta - Mahalla

Delt

a Z

5 Desouk

Kafr El sheikh

Delt

a Z

6 Mansoura

Senbelawen

Delt

a Z

7 Domyat

Ras El bar

Delt

a Z

8 Menoufbagour

Shebin el Koum

Page 157: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

157 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020157

Voice

Service

KPI’s

Page 158: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

158 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Accessibility: Call Blocked Rate

158

Call Blocked Rate represents the ratio between unsuccessful call attempts and all calls made (both successful & unsuccessful).

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

Qaliobia Sharkeya AlBeheira alGharbeya Kafr El sheikh Dakahleya Domyat Menofeya

Call Blocked Rate - Zones

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

16%

18%

20%

22%

24%

Banha Qalyoub Qanatir 10th oframadan

Faqous Zagazig Damnhour Kafr Eldawar Kafr el Zayat Tanta -Mahalla

Desouk - KafrGhounim

Kafr El sheikh Mansoura Senbelawen Domyat Ras el Bar Menouf -bagour

Shebin elKoum

Call Blocked Rate

2.19%

1.88%

1.22%

0.84%

0% 2% 4% 6% 8%

Call Blocked Rate - Overall

2/3/4G: Short Call

Page 159: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

159 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Retainability: Call Dropped Rate

159

Voice Call Retainability is represented by call drop rates.

0.43%

0.47%

0.27%

0.50%

0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5%

Voice Call Droped Rate - Overall

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

Banha Qalyoub Qanatir 10th oframadan

Faqous Zagazig Damnhour Kafr Eldawar Kafr el Zayat Tanta -Mahalla

Desouk - KafrGhounim

Kafr El sheikh Mansoura Senbelawen Domyat Ras el Bar Menouf -bagour

Shebin elKoum

Voice Call Droped Rate

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

Qaliobia Sharkeya AlBeheira alGharbeya Kafr El sheikh Dakahleya Domyat Menofeya

Voice Call Droped Rate - Zones

2/3/4G: Short Call

Page 160: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

160 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Accessibility: CSFB Failure Rate [%]

160

CSFB Failure Rate represents the ratio between unsuccessful fall back attempt to lower technology than 4G (LTE) and all calls made (both successful &

unsuccessful). When there is 4G (LTE) present before starting the session.

0.04%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5%

CSFB Failure Rate - Overall

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

Banha Qalyoub Qanatir 10th oframadan

Faqous Zagazig Damnhour Kafr Eldawar Kafr el Zayat Tanta -Mahalla

Desouk - KafrGhounim

Kafr El sheikh Mansoura Senbelawen Domyat Ras el Bar Menouf -bagour

Shebin elKoum

CSFB Failure Rate

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

Qaliobia Sharkeya AlBeheira alGharbeya Kafr El sheikh Dakahleya Domyat Menofeya

CSFB Failure Rate - Zones

2/3/4G: Short Call

Page 161: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

161 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Speech Quality: MOS Voice Speech Quality < 2.8

161

MOS Voice Speech Quality < 2.8 represents the ratio between total number of MOS samples less than 2.8 all collected MOS samples

5.30%

4.12%

6.07%

5.06%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20%

Voice Speech Quality on Sample < 2.8 - Overall

0%

10%

20%

Qaliobia Sharkeya AlBeheira alGharbeya Kafr El sheikh Dakahleya Domyat Menofeya

Voice Speech Quality on Sample < 2.8 - Zones

0%

10%

20%

Banha Qalyoub Qanatir 10th oframadan

Faqous Zagazig Damnhour Kafr Eldawar Kafr el Zayat Tanta -Mahalla

Desouk - KafrGhounim

Kafr El sheikh Mansoura Senbelawen Domyat Ras el Bar Menouf -bagour

Shebin elKoum

Voice Speech Quality on Sample < 2.8

2/3/4G: Short Call

Page 162: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

162 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Accessibility: Call Access Time [sec.]

162

Call Access represents the period of time elapsed from the sending of a complete destination address (target number) to the setting up of a call to the

receiving terminal.

0

5

10

15

Banha Qalyoub Qanatir 10th oframadan

Faqous Zagazig Damnhour Kafr Eldawar Kafr el Zayat Tanta -Mahalla

Desouk - KafrGhounim

Kafr El sheikh Mansoura Senbelawen Domyat Ras el Bar Menouf -bagour

Shebin elKoum

Call Access Time

0

5

10

15

Qaliobia Sharkeya AlBeheira alGharbeya Kafr El sheikh Dakahleya Domyat Menofeya

Call Access Time - Zones

8.62

8.04

7.68

6.75

0 5 10 15

Call Access Time - Overall

2/3/4G: Short Call

Page 163: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

163 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Accessibility: CSFB Delay [sec.]

163

CSFB Delay represents the period of time to overlay 3G/2G environment instead of handling calls in 4G (LTE). Depending on the CSFB strategy.

0

1

2

3

4

5

Banha Qalyoub Qanatir 10th oframadan

Faqous Zagazig Damnhour Kafr Eldawar Kafr el Zayat Tanta -Mahalla

Desouk - KafrGhounim

Kafr El sheikh Mansoura Senbelawen Domyat Ras el Bar Menouf -bagour

Shebin elKoum

Circuit Switch Fall Back Delay

0

1

2

3

4

5

Qaliobia Sharkeya AlBeheira alGharbeya Kafr El sheikh Dakahleya Domyat Menofeya

Circuit Switch Fall Back Delay - Zones

0.80

0.73

0.69

0.62

0 1 2 3 4 5

Circuit Switch Fall Back Delay - Overall

2/3/4G: Short Call

Page 164: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

164 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Accessibility: Telephony Return Delay [sec.]

164

Telephony Return Delay measures the time that a UE uses to re-join the LTE (4G) network after call end

0

1

2

3

4

5

Banha Qalyoub Qanatir 10th oframadan

Faqous Zagazig Damnhour Kafr Eldawar Kafr el Zayat Tanta -Mahalla

Desouk - KafrGhounim

Kafr El sheikh Mansoura Senbelawen Domyat Ras el Bar Menouf -bagour

Shebin elKoum

Telephony Return Delay

0

1

2

3

4

5

Qaliobia Sharkeya AlBeheira alGharbeya Kafr El sheikh Dakahleya Domyat Menofeya

Telephony Return Delay - Zones

0.78

0.89

1.13

0.65

0 1 2 3 4 5

Telephony Return Delay - Overall

2/3/4G: Short Call

Page 165: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

165 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020165

Voice

Speech

Quality

KPI’s

Page 166: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

166 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Speech Quality: MOS Scores

166

0

1

2

3

4

5

Banha Qalyoub Qanatir 10th oframadan

Faqous Zagazig Damnhour Kafr Eldawar Kafr el Zayat Tanta -Mahalla

Desouk - KafrGhounim

Kafr El sheikh Mansoura Senbelawen Domyat Ras el Bar Menouf -bagour

Shebin elKoum

Voice Speech Quality

0

1

2

3

4

5

Qaliobia Sharkeya AlBeheira alGharbeya Kafr El sheikh Dakahleya Domyat Menofeya

Voice Speech Quality - Zones

3.38

3.49

3.35

3.40

0 1 2 3 4 5

Voice Speech Quality - Overall

Page 167: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

167 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Speech Quality: Call technology Usage & Codec Base Usage

167

Call technology Usage represents the call technology

used over call period. The more calls on 3G (UMTS) the

better MOS served.

Codec Base Usage represents the codec used over the call where AMR

wideband (AMR WB) leads to better voice quality experience by the end

user than the AMR Narrowband (AMR NB)

99%

100%

99%

98%

1%

0%

1%

2%

0% 25% 50% 75% 100%

We

Etisalat

Orange

Vodafone

Call Technology Usage Overall

3G

2G

0.07%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

AMR NB

AMR WB

EFR

Codec Base Usage

Page 168: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

168 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020168

Failed &

Dropped

Calls

Causes

Page 169: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

169 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Analysis: Dropped Calls Causes

169

46%

16%

15%

23%

3G Quality

Core Network

Mobility Issue

RAN Issue

28%

43%

29%

3G Coverage

3G Quality

RAN Issue

9%

8%

33%

17%

33% 2G Quality

3G Coverage

3G Quality

Mobility Issue

RAN Issue

9%

37%

18%

36%2G Quality

3G Quality

Mobility Issue

RAN Issue

Page 170: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

170 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

All Operators: Dropped Calls Locations 1/2

170

Page 171: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

171 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

All Operators: Dropped Calls Locations 2/2

171

Page 172: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

172 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Analysis: Failed Calls Causes

18%

14%

4%

5%

27%

18%

5%9%

3G Quality

4G Coverage

4G Quality

Core Network

CSFB Issue

Mobility Issue

Paging Issue

RAN Issue

3%

3%

13%

3%

6%

22%

3%

47%

2G Quality

3G Coverage

3G Quality

Core Network

CSFB Issue

No service

Paging Issue

RAN Issue

2%

6%

8%2%

8%

2%

4%68%

3G Coverage

3G Quality

CSFB Issue

Mobility Issue

No service

Other

Paging Issue

RAN Issue

4%

4%

2%

28%

11%9%

9%

5%

4%

26%

3G Coverage

3G Quality

4G Quality

Core Network

CSFB Issue

Mobility Issue

No service

Other

Paging Issue

RAN Issue

Page 173: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

173 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

All Operators: Blocked Calls Locations 1/2

173

Page 174: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

174 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

All Operators: Blocked Calls Locations 2/2

174

Page 175: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

AGENDA

1. Quantitative Information

2. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Cairo

3. Data Service Quality & Performance – Cairo

4. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Giza

5. Data Service Quality & Performance – Giza

6. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria

7. Data Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria

8. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Delta

9. Data Service Quality & Performance – Delta

10. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Canal

11. Data Service Quality & Performance – Canal

12. Voice Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt

13. Data Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt

14. Annexes

175 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Page 176: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

176 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020176

Data

Service

KPI’s

Page 177: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

177 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Free Mode Throughput Per Test Type

177

NETWORK PERFORMANCE TEST USER EXPERIENCE TEST

-

20,000

40,000

60,000

80,000

100,000

120,000

140,000

-

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

20 sec Continuous Download(400 MB file)

15 sec Continuous Upload(200 MB file)

20 MB File Download 2 MB File Upload

Max

imu

m t

hro

ugh

pu

t

Ave

rage

th

rou

ghp

ut

Vodafone Orange Etisalat We Vodafone Max Orange Max Etisalat Max We Max

Page 178: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

178 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

FDTT HTTP Download Transfer Throughput – Network Performance

2699029008

31077

24209

0 2,500 5,000 7,500 10,000 12,500 15,000 17,500 20,000 22,500 25,000 27,500 30,000 32,500 35,000

400 MB File FDTT HTTP Download [kbps] - Overall

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

40,000

Qaliobia Sharkeya AlBeheira alGharbeya Kafr El sheikh Dakahleya Domyat Menofeya

400 MB File FDTT HTTP Download Throughput [kbps] - Zones

02,5005,0007,500

10,00012,50015,00017,50020,00022,50025,00027,50030,00032,50035,00037,50040,00042,50045,00047,50050,000

Banha Qalyoub Qanatir 10th oframadan

Faqous Zagazig Damnhour Kafr Eldawar Kafr el Zayat Tanta -Mahalla

Desouk - KafrGhounim

Kafr El sheikh Mansoura Senbelawen Domyat Ras el Bar Menouf -bagour

Shebin elKoum

400 MB File FDTT HTTP Download Throughput [kbps]

Page 179: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

179 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

FDTT HTTP Upload Transfer Throughput – Network Performance

14355

17871

17477

12101

0 1,500 3,000 4,500 6,000 7,500 9,000 10,500 12,000 13,500 15,000 16,500 18,000

200 MB FDTT HTTP Upload Throughput [kbps] - Overall

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

Qaliobia Sharkeya AlBeheira alGharbeya Kafr El sheikh Dakahleya Domyat Menofeya

200 MB FDTT HTTP Upload Throughput [kbps] - Zones

01,5003,0004,5006,0007,5009,000

10,50012,00013,50015,00016,50018,00019,50021,00022,50024,00025,50027,00028,50030,00031,50033,000

Banha Qalyoub Qanatir 10th oframadan

Faqous Zagazig Damnhour Kafr Eldawar Kafr el Zayat Tanta -Mahalla

Desouk - KafrGhounim

Kafr El sheikh Mansoura Senbelawen Domyat Ras el Bar Menouf -bagour

Shebin elKoum

200 MB FDTT HTTP Upload Throughput [kbps]

Page 180: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

180 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

HTTP Download Session Blocked Rates

0.12%

0.11%

0.24%

0.45%

0% 5% 10%

Download Session Blocked Ratio - Overall

0%

5%

10%

Banha Qalyoub Qanatir 10th oframadan

Faqous Zagazig Damnhour Kafr Eldawar Kafr el Zayat Tanta -Mahalla

Desouk - KafrGhounim

Kafr El sheikh Mansoura Senbelawen Domyat Ras el Bar Menouf -bagour

Shebin elKoum

Download Session Blocked Ratio

0%

5%

10%

15%

Qaliobia Sharkeya AlBeheira alGharbeya Kafr El sheikh Dakahleya Domyat Menofeya

Download Session Blocked Ratio - Zones

Page 181: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

181 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

HTTP Upload Session Blocked Rates

0.12%

0.07%

0.17%

0.30%

0% 5% 10%

Upload Session Blocked Ratio - Overall

0%

5%

10%

15%

Qaliobia Sharkeya AlBeheira alGharbeya Kafr El sheikh Dakahleya Domyat Menofeya

Upload Session Blocked Ratio - Zones

0%

5%

10%

15%

Banha Qalyoub Qanatir 10th oframadan

Faqous Zagazig Damnhour Kafr Eldawar Kafr el Zayat Tanta -Mahalla

Desouk - KafrGhounim

Kafr El sheikh Mansoura Senbelawen Domyat Ras el Bar Menouf -bagour

Shebin elKoum

Upload Session Blocked Ratio

Page 182: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

182 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

HTTP Download Average Session Setup Time

0.13

0.11

0.15

0.15

0 2 4 6 8 10

Average Session Setup Time [sec] - Overall

0

2

4

6

8

10

Qaliobia Sharkeya AlBeheira alGharbeya Kafr El sheikh Dakahleya Domyat Menofeya

Average Session Setup Time [sec] - Zones

0

2

4

6

8

10

Banha Qalyoub Qanatir 10th oframadan

Faqous Zagazig Damnhour Kafr Eldawar Kafr el Zayat Tanta -Mahalla

Desouk - KafrGhounim

Kafr El sheikh Mansoura Senbelawen Domyat Ras el Bar Menouf -bagour

Shebin elKoum

Average Session Setup Time [sec]

Page 183: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

183 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

HTTP Upload Average Session Setup Time

0

2

4

6

8

10

Qaliobia Sharkeya AlBeheira alGharbeya Kafr El sheikh Dakahleya Domyat Menofeya

Average Session Setup Time [sec] - Zones

0

2

4

6

8

10

Banha Qalyoub Qanatir 10th oframadan

Faqous Zagazig Damnhour Kafr Eldawar Kafr el Zayat Tanta -Mahalla

Desouk - KafrGhounim

Kafr El sheikh Mansoura Senbelawen Domyat Ras el Bar Menouf -bagour

Shebin elKoum

Average Session Setup Time [sec]

0.11

0.13

0.08

0.06

0 2 4 6 8 10

Average Session Setup Time [sec] - Overall

Page 184: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

184 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020184

Throughput

KPI’s Customer

Experience

Page 185: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

185 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

HTTP Download Throughput – Customer Experience

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

40,000

45,000

Banha Qalyoub Qanatir 10th oframadan

Faqous Zagazig Damnhour Kafr Eldawar Kafr el Zayat Tanta -Mahalla

Desouk - KafrGhounim

Kafr El sheikh Mansoura Senbelawen Domyat Ras el Bar Menouf -bagour

Shebin elKoum

20MB Download Throughput [kbps]

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

40,000

Qaliobia Sharkeya AlBeheira alGharbeya Kafr El sheikh Dakahleya Domyat Menofeya

20MB Download Throughput [kbps] - Zones

26,265

28,196

29,720

22,613

0 10,000 20,000 30,000

20MB Download Throughput [kbps] - Overall

Page 186: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

186 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

HTTP Upload Throughput – Customer Experience

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

Banha Qalyoub Qanatir 10th oframadan

Faqous Zagazig Damnhour Kafr Eldawar Kafr el Zayat Tanta -Mahalla

Desouk - KafrGhounim

Kafr El sheikh Mansoura Senbelawen Domyat Ras el Bar Menouf -bagour

Shebin elKoum

2MB Upload Throughput [kbps]

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

Qaliobia Sharkeya AlBeheira alGharbeya Kafr El sheikh Dakahleya Domyat Menofeya

2MB Upload Throughput [kbps] - Zones

8,378

10,132

9,024

5,297

0 5,000 10,000 15,000

2MB Upload Throughput [kbps] - Overall

Page 187: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

187 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020187

Browsing

& YouTube

Service

KPI’s

Page 188: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

188 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Session Failure Ratio

188

0%

5%

10%

Banha Qalyoub Qanatir 10th oframadan

Faqous Zagazig Damnhour Kafr Eldawar Kafr el Zayat Tanta -Mahalla

Desouk - KafrGhounim

Kafr El sheikh Mansoura Senbelawen Domyat Ras el Bar Menouf -bagour

Shebin elKoum

Session Failure Ratio

0%

5%

10%

Qaliobia Sharkeya AlBeheira alGharbeya Kafr El sheikh Dakahleya Domyat Menofeya

Session Failure Ratio - Zones

0.28%

0.43%

0.38%

1.87%

0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10%

Session Failure Ratio - Overall

Page 189: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

189 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Session Time

189

0

5

10

15

Banha Qalyoub Qanatir 10th oframadan

Faqous Zagazig Damnhour Kafr Eldawar Kafr el Zayat Tanta -Mahalla

Desouk - KafrGhounim

Kafr El sheikh Mansoura Senbelawen Domyat Ras el Bar Menouf -bagour

Shebin elKoum

Average Session Time

0

5

10

15

Qaliobia Sharkeya AlBeheira alGharbeya Kafr El sheikh Dakahleya Domyat Menofeya

Average Session Setup - Zones

3.51

4.24

4.20

4.25

0 2 4 6 8 10

Average Session Setup - Overall

Page 190: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

190 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Session Failure Ratio

190

0%

5%

10%

Banha Qalyoub Qanatir 10th oframadan

Faqous Zagazig Damnhour Kafr Eldawar Kafr el Zayat Tanta -Mahalla

Desouk - KafrGhounim

Kafr El sheikh Mansoura Senbelawen Domyat Ras el Bar Menouf -bagour

Shebin elKoum

Session Failure Ratio

0%

5%

10%

Qaliobia Sharkeya AlBeheira alGharbeya Kafr El sheikh Dakahleya Domyat Menofeya

Session Failure Ratio - Zones

0.28%

0.43%

0.24%

1.12%

0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10%

Session Failure Ratio - Overall

Page 191: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

191 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Session Time

191

0

2

4

6

8

10

Banha Qalyoub Qanatir 10th oframadan

Faqous Zagazig Damnhour Kafr Eldawar Kafr el Zayat Tanta -Mahalla

Desouk - KafrGhounim

Kafr El sheikh Mansoura Senbelawen Domyat Ras el Bar Menouf -bagour

Shebin elKoum

Average Session Time

0

2

4

6

8

10

Qaliobia Sharkeya AlBeheira alGharbeya Kafr El sheikh Dakahleya Domyat Menofeya

Average Session Setup - Zones

2.00

2.17

2.03

2.16

0 2 4 6 8 10

Average Session Setup - Overall

Page 192: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

192 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Session Failure Ratio

192

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

Banha Qalyoub Qanatir 10th oframadan

Faqous Zagazig Damnhour Kafr Eldawar Kafr el Zayat Tanta -Mahalla

Desouk - KafrGhounim

Kafr El sheikh Mansoura Senbelawen Domyat Ras el Bar Menouf -bagour

Shebin elKoum

YouTube Session Failure Ratio

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

Qaliobia Sharkeya AlBeheira alGharbeya Kafr El sheikh Dakahleya Domyat Menofeya

YouTube Session Failure Ratio - Zones

0.40%

0.68%

0.70%

0.90%

0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10%

YouTube Session Failure Ratio - Overall

Page 193: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

193 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Freezing Time [msec]

193

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

Banha Qalyoub Qanatir 10th oframadan

Faqous Zagazig Damnhour Kafr Eldawar Kafr el Zayat Tanta -Mahalla

Desouk - KafrGhounim

Kafr El sheikh Mansoura Senbelawen Domyat Ras el Bar Menouf -bagour

Shebin elKoum

Freezing Time

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

Qaliobia Sharkeya AlBeheira alGharbeya Kafr El sheikh Dakahleya Domyat Menofeya

Freezing Time - Zones

55

60

23

75

0 100 200 300 400 500

Freezing Time - Overall

Page 194: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

194 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Video Quality

194

0

1

2

3

4

5

Banha Qalyoub Qanatir 10th oframadan

Faqous Zagazig Damnhour Kafr Eldawar Kafr el Zayat Tanta -Mahalla

Desouk - KafrGhounim

Kafr El sheikh Mansoura Senbelawen Domyat Ras el Bar Menouf -bagour

Shebin elKoum

Video Quality - VMOS

0

1

2

3

4

5

Qaliobia Sharkeya AlBeheira alGharbeya Kafr El sheikh Dakahleya Domyat Menofeya

Video Quality [VMOS] - Zones

4.07

4.07

4.09

4.07

0 1 2 3 4 5

Video Quality [VMOS] - Overall

Page 195: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

195 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Time to 1st Picture

195

0

1

2

3

4

5

Banha Qalyoub Qanatir 10th oframadan

Faqous Zagazig Damnhour Kafr Eldawar Kafr el Zayat Tanta -Mahalla

Desouk - KafrGhounim

Kafr El sheikh Mansoura Senbelawen Domyat Ras el Bar Menouf -bagour

Shebin elKoum

Time to First Picture [s]

0

1

2

3

4

5

Qaliobia Sharkeya AlBeheira alGharbeya Kafr El sheikh Dakahleya Domyat Menofeya

Time to First Picture [s] - Zones

1.75

1.79

1.78

1.94

0 1 2 3 4 5

Time to First Picture [s] - Overall

Page 196: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

196 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020196

Image Resolution

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

1088 720 480 360 240 144

Youtube - Image Resolution

Page 197: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

AGENDA

1. Quantitative Information

2. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Cairo

3. Data Service Quality & Performance – Cairo

4. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Giza

5. Data Service Quality & Performance – Giza

6. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria

7. Data Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria

8. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Delta

9. Data Service Quality & Performance – Delta

10. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Canal

11. Data Service Quality & Performance – Canal

12. Voice Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt

13. Data Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt

14. Annexes

197 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Page 198: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

198 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Zones Definition

198

Canal City

Can

al

Z1 Fayed Abou Sultan

Ismailia

Qantara

Can

al

Z2

Sokhna

Suez

Can

al

Z3

PortSaid

Can

al

Z4

Hurghada

Page 199: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

199 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020199

Voice

Service

KPI’s

Page 200: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

200 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Accessibility: Call Blocked Rate

200

Call Blocked Rate represents the ratio between unsuccessful call attempts and all calls made (both successful & unsuccessful).

2/3/4G: Short Call

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

Ismailia Suez PortSaid RedSea

Call Blocked Rate - Zones

2.03%

1.20%

1.04%

0.60%

0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6%

Call Blocked Rate - Overall

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

Fayed Abou Sultan Ismailia Qantara Sokhna Suez PortSaid Hurghada - Sahl Hashish - Somabay

Call Blocked Rate

Page 201: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

201 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Retainability: Call Dropped Rate

201

Voice Call Retainability is represented by call drop rates.

2/3/4G: Short Call

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

Fayed Abou Sultan Ismailia Qantara Sokhna Suez PortSaid Hurghada - Sahl Hashish - Somabay

Voice Call Droped Rate

0.38%

0.53%

0.15%

0.23%

0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5%

Voice Call Droped Rate - Overall

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

Ismailia Suez PortSaid RedSea

Voice Call Droped Rate - Zones

Page 202: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

202 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Accessibility: CSFB Failure Rate [%]

202

CSFB Failure Rate represents the ratio between unsuccessful fall back attempt to lower technology than 4G (LTE) and all calls made (both successful &

unsuccessful). When there is 4G (LTE) present before starting the session.

2/3/4G: Short Call

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5%

CSFB Failure Rate - Overall

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

Fayed Abou Sultan Ismailia Qantara Sokhna Suez PortSaid Hurghada - Sahl Hashish - Somabay

CSFB Failure Rate

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

Ismailia Suez PortSaid RedSea

CSFB Failure Rate - Zones

Page 203: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

203 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Speech Quality: MOS Voice Speech Quality < 2.8

203

MOS Voice Speech Quality < 2.8 represents the ratio between total number of MOS samples less than 2.8 all collected MOS samples

2/3/4G: Short Call

3.60%

3.50%

6.21%

6.22%

0% 5% 10% 15%

Voice Speech Quality on Sample < 2.8 - Overall

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

Fayed Abou Sultan Ismailia Qantara Sokhna Suez PortSaid Hurghada - Sahl Hashish - Somabay

Voice Speech Quality on Sample < 2.8

0%

10%

20%

30%

Ismailia Suez PortSaid RedSea

Voice Speech Quality on Sample < 2.8 - Zones

Page 204: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

204 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Accessibility: Call Access Time [sec.]

204

Call Access represents the period of time elapsed from the sending of a complete destination address (target number) to the setting up of a call to the

receiving terminal.

2/3/4G: Short Call

0

5

10

15

Fayed Abou Sultan Ismailia Qantara Sokhna Suez PortSaid Hurghada - Sahl Hashish - Somabay

Call Access Time

0

5

10

15

Ismailia Suez PortSaid RedSea

Call Access Time - Zones

8.73

7.65

7.08

6.50

0 5 10 15

Call Access Time - Overall

Page 205: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

205 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Accessibility: CSFB Delay [sec.]

205

CSFB Delay represents the period of time to overlay 3G/2G environment instead of handling calls in 4G (LTE). Depending on the CSFB strategy.

2/3/4G: Short Call

0

1

2

3

4

5

Fayed Abou Sultan Ismailia Qantara Sokhna Suez PortSaid Hurghada - Sahl Hashish - Somabay

Circuit Switch Fall Back Delay

0

1

2

3

4

5

Ismailia Suez PortSaid RedSea

Circuit Switch Fall Back Delay - Zones

1.00

0.95

0.65

0.88

0 1 2 3 4 5

Circuit Switch Fall Back Delay - Overall

Page 206: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

206 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Accessibility: Telephony Return Delay [sec.]

206

Telephony Return Delay measures the time that a UE uses to re-join the LTE (4G) network after call end

2/3/4G: Short Call

0

1

2

3

4

5

Fayed Abou Sultan Ismailia Qantara Sokhna Suez PortSaid Hurghada - Sahl Hashish - Somabay

Telephony Return Delay

0

1

2

3

4

5

Ismailia Suez PortSaid RedSea

Telephony Return Delay - Zones

0.67

0.67

0.95

0.76

0 1 2 3 4 5

Telephony Return Delay - Overall

Page 207: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

207 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020207

Voice

Speech

Quality

KPI’s

Page 208: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

208 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Speech Quality: MOS Scores

208

0

1

2

3

4

5

Fayed Abou Sultan Ismailia Qantara Sokhna Suez PortSaid Hurghada - Sahl Hashish - Somabay

Voice Speech Quality

0

1

2

3

4

5

Ismailia Suez PortSaid RedSea

Voice Speech Quality - Zones

3.43

3.55

3.38

3.38

0 1 2 3 4 5

Voice Speech Quality - Overall

Page 209: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

209 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Speech Quality: Call technology Usage & Codec Base Usage

209

Call technology Usage represents the call technology

used over call period. The more calls on 3G (UMTS) the

better MOS served.

Codec Base Usage represents the codec used over the call where AMR

wideband (AMR WB) leads to better voice quality experience by the end

user than the AMR Narrowband (AMR NB)

99%

99%

99%

96%

1%

1%

1%

4%

0% 25% 50% 75% 100%

We

Etisalat

Orange

Vodafone

Call Technology Usage Overall

3G

2G

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

AMR NarrowBand

AMR WideBand

Codec Base Usage

Page 210: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

210 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020210

Failed &

Dropped

Calls

Causes

Page 211: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

211 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Analysis: Dropped Calls Causes

211

67%

33%

3G Quality

Mobility Issue

50%50%

3G Quality

RAN Issue

14%

57%

29%

3G Coverage

3G Quality

RAN Issue

20%

80%

3G Coverage

3G Quality

Page 212: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

212 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

All Operators: Dropped Calls Locations 1/2

212

Page 213: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

213 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

All Operators: Dropped Calls Locations 2/2

213

Page 214: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

214 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Analysis: Failed Calls Causes

25%

12%

13%

25%

25%

3G Quality

4G Coverage

Core Network

Mobility Issue

No service

14%7%

7%

29%

22%

21%3G Quality

4G Quality

Core Network

CSFB Issue

Mobility Issue

RAN Issue

19%

6%

13%

6%

56%

3G Coverage

3G Quality

CSFB Issue

No service

RAN Issue

4%15%

7%

7%

4%4%

59%

3G Coverage

3G Quality

Core Network

Mobility Issue

No service

Paging Issue

RAN Issue

Page 215: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

215 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

All Operators: Blocked Calls Locations 1/2

215

Page 216: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

216 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

All Operators: Blocked Calls Locations 2/2

216

Page 217: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

AGENDA

1. Quantitative Information

2. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Cairo

3. Data Service Quality & Performance – Cairo

4. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Giza

5. Data Service Quality & Performance – Giza

6. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria

7. Data Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria

8. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Delta

9. Data Service Quality & Performance – Delta

10. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Canal

11. Data Service Quality & Performance – Canal

12. Voice Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt

13. Data Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt

14. Annexes

217 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Page 218: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

218 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020218

Data

Service

KPI’s

Page 219: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

219 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Free Mode Throughput Per Test Type

219

NETWORK PERFORMANCE TEST USER EXPERIENCE TEST

-

20,000

40,000

60,000

80,000

100,000

120,000

140,000

160,000

-

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

20 sec Continuous Download(400 MB file)

15 sec Continuous Upload(200 MB file)

20 MB File Download 2 MB File Upload

Max

imu

m t

hro

ugh

pu

t

Ave

rage

th

rou

ghp

ut

Vodafone Orange Etisalat We Vodafone Max Orange Max Etisalat Max We Max

Page 220: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

220 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

FDTT HTTP Download Transfer Throughput – Network Performance

26058

30136

32684

25916

0 2,500 5,000 7,500 10,000 12,500 15,000 17,500 20,000 22,500 25,000 27,500 30,000 32,500 35,000

400 MB File FDTT HTTP Download [kbps] - Overall

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

40,000

45,000

Ismailia Suez PortSaid RedSea

400 MB File FDTT HTTP Download Throughput [kbps] - Zones

02,5005,0007,500

10,00012,50015,00017,50020,00022,50025,00027,50030,00032,50035,00037,50040,00042,50045,00047,50050,00052,50055,000

Fayed Abou Sultan Ismailia Qantara Sokhna Suez PortSaid Hurghada - Sahl Hashish - Somabay

400 MB File FDTT HTTP Download Throughput [kbps]

Page 221: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

221 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

FDTT HTTP Upload Transfer Throughput – Network Performance

16369

21587

21621

10985

0 1,500 3,000 4,500 6,000 7,500 9,000 10,500 12,000 13,500 15,000 16,500 18,000 19,500 21,000 22,500 24,000

200 MB FDTT HTTP Upload Throughput [kbps] - Overall

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

Ismailia Suez PortSaid RedSea

200 MB FDTT HTTP Upload Throughput [kbps] - Zones

01,5003,0004,5006,0007,5009,000

10,50012,00013,50015,00016,50018,00019,50021,00022,50024,00025,50027,00028,50030,00031,50033,00034,50036,000

Fayed Abou Sultan Ismailia Qantara Sokhna Suez PortSaid Hurghada - Sahl Hashish - Somabay

200 MB FDTT HTTP Upload Throughput [kbps]

Page 222: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

222 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

HTTP Download Session Blocked Rates

0.14%

0.42%

0.13%

0.78%

0% 5% 10% 15%

Download Session Blocked Ratio - Overall

0%

5%

10%

15%

Fayed Abou Sultan Ismailia Qantara Sokhna Suez PortSaid Hurghada - Sahl Hashish - Somabay

Download Session Blocked Ratio

0%

5%

10%

15%

Ismailia Suez PortSaid RedSea

Download Session Blocked Ratio - Zones

Page 223: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

223 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

HTTP Upload Session Blocked Rates

0.48%

0.28%

0.07%

0.64%

0% 5% 10%

Upload Session Blocked Ratio - Overall

0%

5%

10%

Ismailia Suez PortSaid RedSea

Upload Session Blocked Ratio - Zones

0%

5%

10%

Fayed Abou Sultan Ismailia Qantara Sokhna Suez PortSaid Hurghada - Sahl Hashish - Somabay

Upload Session Blocked Ratio

Page 224: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

224 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

HTTP Download Average Session Setup Time

0.16

0.20

0.13

0.16

0 2 4 6 8 10

Average Session Setup Time [sec] - Overall

0

2

4

6

8

10

Ismailia Suez PortSaid RedSea

Average Session Setup Time [sec] - Zones

0

2

4

6

8

10

Fayed Abou Sultan Ismailia Qantara Sokhna Suez PortSaid Hurghada - Sahl Hashish - Somabay

Average Session Setup Time [sec]

Page 225: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

225 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

HTTP Upload Average Session Setup Time

0

2

4

6

8

10

Ismailia Suez PortSaid RedSea

Average Session Setup Time [sec] - Zones

0

2

4

6

8

10

Fayed Abou Sultan Ismailia Qantara Sokhna Suez PortSaid Hurghada - Sahl Hashish - Somabay

Average Session Setup Time [sec]

0.11

0.14

0.06

0.05

0 2 4 6 8 10

Average Session Setup Time [sec] - Overall

Page 226: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

226 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020226

Throughput

KPI’s Customer

Experience

Page 227: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

227 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

HTTP Download Throughput – Customer Experience

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

Fayed Abou Sultan Ismailia Qantara Sokhna Suez PortSaid Hurghada - Sahl Hashish - Somabay

20MB Download Throughput [kbps]

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

40,000

45,000

Ismailia Suez PortSaid RedSea

20MB Download Throughput [kbps] - Zones

25,649

28,740

30,547

25,294

0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000

20MB Download Throughput [kbps] - Overall

Page 228: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

228 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

HTTP Upload Throughput – Customer Experience

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

Fayed Abou Sultan Ismailia Qantara Sokhna Suez PortSaid Hurghada - Sahl Hashish - Somabay

2MB Upload Throughput [kbps]

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

Ismailia Suez PortSaid RedSea

2MB Upload Throughput [kbps] - Zones

8,959

11,220

11,053

4,522

0 5,000 10,000 15,000

2MB Upload Throughput [kbps] - Overall

Page 229: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

229 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020229

Browsing

& YouTube

Service

KPI’s

Page 230: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

230 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Session Failure Ratio

230

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

Fayed Abou Sultan Ismailia Qantara Sokhna Suez PortSaid Hurghada - Sahl Hashish - Somabay

Session Failure Ratio

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

Ismailia Suez PortSaid RedSea

Session Failure Ratio - Zones

0.62%

0.98%

0.00%

0.79%

0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5%

Session Failure Ratio - Overall

Page 231: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

231 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Session Time

231

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

Fayed Abou Sultan Ismailia Qantara Sokhna Suez PortSaid Hurghada - Sahl Hashish - Somabay

Average Session Time

0

2

4

6

8

10

Ismailia Suez PortSaid RedSea

Average Session Time - Zones

3.57

5.16

4.11

4.19

0 2 4 6 8 10

Average Session Time - Overall

Page 232: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

232 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Session Failure Ratio

232

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

Fayed Abou Sultan Ismailia Qantara Sokhna Suez PortSaid Hurghada - Sahl Hashish - Somabay

Session Failure Ratio

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

Ismailia Suez PortSaid RedSea

Session Failure Ratio - Zones

0.69%

1.32%

0.26%

0.93%

0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5%

Session Failure Ratio - Overall

Page 233: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

233 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Session Time

233

0

2

4

6

8

10

Fayed Abou Sultan Ismailia Qantara Sokhna Suez PortSaid Hurghada - Sahl Hashish - Somabay

Average Session Time

0

2

4

6

8

10

Ismailia Suez PortSaid RedSea

Average Session Time - Zones

2.00

2.39

2.05

2.31

0 2 4 6 8 10

Average Session Time - Overall

Page 234: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

234 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Session Failure Ratio

234

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

Fayed Abou Sultan Ismailia Qantara Sokhna Suez PortSaid Hurghada - Sahl Hashish - Somabay

YouTube Session Failure Ratio

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

Ismailia Suez PortSaid RedSea

YouTube Session Failure Ratio - Zones

0.77%

0.56%

4.20%

0.94%

0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5%

YouTube Session Failure Ratio - Overall

Page 235: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

235 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Freezing Time [msec]

235

0

200

400

Fayed Abou Sultan Ismailia Qantara Sokhna Suez PortSaid Hurghada - Sahl Hashish - Somabay

Freezing Time

0

200

400

Ismailia Suez PortSaid RedSea

Freezing Time - Zones

95

11

97

26

0 100 200 300

Freezing Time - Overall

Page 236: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

236 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Video Quality

236

0

1

2

3

4

5

Fayed Abou Sultan Ismailia Qantara Sokhna Suez PortSaid Hurghada - Sahl Hashish - Somabay

Video Quality - VMOS

0

1

2

3

4

5

Ismailia Suez PortSaid RedSea

Video Quality [VMOS] - Zones

4.09

4.09

4.08

4.09

0 1 2 3 4 5

Video Quality [VMOS] - Overall

Page 237: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

237 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Time to 1st Picture

237

0

1

2

3

4

5

Fayed Abou Sultan Ismailia Qantara Sokhna Suez PortSaid Hurghada - Sahl Hashish - Somabay

Time to First Picture [s]

0

1

2

3

4

5

Ismailia Suez PortSaid RedSea

Time to First Picture [s] - Zones

1.68

1.70

1.80

1.89

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

Time to First Picture [s] - Overall

Page 238: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

238 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020238

Image Resolution

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

1088 720 480 360 240 144

Youtube - Image Resolution

Page 239: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

AGENDA

1. Quantitative Information

2. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Cairo

3. Data Service Quality & Performance – Cairo

4. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Giza

5. Data Service Quality & Performance – Giza

6. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria

7. Data Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria

8. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Delta

9. Data Service Quality & Performance – Delta

10. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Canal

11. Data Service Quality & Performance – Canal

12. Voice Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt

13. Data Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt

14. Annexes

239 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Page 240: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

240 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Zones Definition

240

Upper Egypt

Up

pe

r Z

1

Fayoum

SinurisTirsa

up

pe

r Z

2 BanySwif

Wasta

Up

pe

r Z

3 AbuQurqas

Menya

Up

pe

r Z

4

Asyut

DayroutManfalout

Up

pe

r Z

5

Sohag

TahtaAkhmim

Up

pe

rZ

6 Kharga

Dakhla

Farafra

Up

pe

r Z

7

Qena

Nagaa

Up

pe

r Z

8

Esna

Luxor

Up

pe

r Z

9

Aswan

Abu Semble

Komombo

Page 241: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

241 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020241

Voice

Service

KPI’s

Page 242: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

242 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Accessibility: Call Blocked Rate

242

Call Blocked Calls represents the ratio between unsuccessful call attempts and all calls made (both successful & unsuccessful).

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

Fayoum Bany Swif ElMenya Asyut Sohag New Valley Qena Luxor Aswan

Call Blocked Rate - Zones

3.00%

1.96%

2.66%

1.09%

0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10%

Call Blocked Rate - Overall

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

Fayoum Sinuris - Tirsa Bany Swif Wasta Abu Qurqas Menya Asyut Dayrout -Manfalout

Sohag Tahta -Akhmim

Kharga -Fararfra

Nagaa Hamadi- Farashut

Qena Esna Luxor Aswan Kom ombo -Daraw - Abu

Sembele

Call Blocked Rate

2/3/4G: Short Call

Page 243: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

243 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Retainability: Call Dropped Rate

243

Voice Call Retainability is represented by call drop rates.

0.24%

0.28%

0.40%

0.20%

0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5%

Voice Call Droped Rate - Overall

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

Fayoum Sinuris - Tirsa Bany Swif Wasta Abu Qurqas Menya Asyut Dayrout -Manfalout

Sohag Tahta -Akhmim

Kharga -Fararfra

Nagaa Hamadi- Farashut

Qena Esna Luxor Aswan Kom ombo -Daraw - Abu

Sembele

Voice Call Droped Rate

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

Fayoum Bany Swif ElMenya Asyut Sohag New Valley Qena Luxor Aswan

Voice Call Droped Rate - Zones

2/3/4G: Short Call

Page 244: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

244 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Accessibility: CSFB Failure Rate [%]

244

CSFB Failure Rate represents the ratio between unsuccessful fall back attempt to lower technology than 4G (LTE) and all calls made (both successful &

unsuccessful). When there is 4G (LTE) present before starting the session.

0.00%

0.05%

0.05%

0.00%

0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5%

CSFB Failure Rate - Overall

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

Fayoum Sinuris - Tirsa Bany Swif Wasta Abu Qurqas Menya Asyut Dayrout -Manfalout

Sohag Tahta -Akhmim

Kharga -Fararfra

Nagaa Hamadi- Farashut

Qena Esna Luxor Aswan Kom ombo -Daraw - Abu

Sembele

CSFB Failure Rate

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

Fayoum Bany Swif ElMenya Asyut Sohag New Valley Qena Luxor Aswan

CSFB Failure Rate - Zones

2/3/4G: Short Call

Page 245: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

245 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Speech Quality: MOS Voice Speech Quality < 2.8

245

MOS Voice Speech Quality < 2.8 represents the ratio between total number of MOS samples less than 2.8 all collected MOS samples

5.66%

5.34%

5.67%

5.77%

0% 10% 20%

Voice Speech Quality on Sample < 2.8 - Overall

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

Fayoum Sinuris - Tirsa Bany Swif Wasta Abu Qurqas Menya Asyut Dayrout -Manfalout

Sohag Tahta -Akhmim

Kharga -Fararfra

Nagaa Hamadi- Farashut

Qena Esna Luxor Aswan Kom ombo -Daraw - Abu

Sembele

Voice Speech Quality on Sample < 2.8

0%

5%

10%

15%

Fayoum Bany Swif ElMenya Asyut Sohag New Valley Qena Luxor Aswan

Voice Speech Quality on Sample < 2.8 - Zones

2/3/4G: Short Call

Page 246: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

246 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Accessibility: Call Access Time [sec.]

246

0

5

10

15

Fayoum Sinuris - Tirsa Bany Swif Wasta Abu Qurqas Menya Asyut Dayrout -Manfalout

Sohag Tahta -Akhmim

Kharga -Fararfra

Nagaa Hamadi- Farashut

Qena Esna Luxor Aswan Kom ombo -Daraw - Abu

Sembele

Call Access Time

0

5

10

15

Fayoum Bany Swif ElMenya Asyut Sohag New Valley Qena Luxor Aswan

Call Access Time - Zones

8.78

8.08

7.79

6.27

0 5 10 15

Call Access Time - Overall

2/3/4G: Short Call

Page 247: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

247 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Accessibility: CSFB Delay [sec.]

247

0

1

2

3

4

5

Fayoum Sinuris - Tirsa Bany Swif Wasta Abu Qurqas Menya Asyut Dayrout -Manfalout

Sohag Tahta -Akhmim

Kharga -Fararfra

Nagaa Hamadi- Farashut

Qena Esna Luxor Aswan Kom ombo -Daraw - Abu

Sembele

Circuit Switch Fall Back Delay

0

1

2

3

4

5

Fayoum Bany Swif ElMenya Asyut Sohag New Valley Qena Luxor Aswan

Circuit Switch Fall Back Delay - Zones

0.96

0.88

0.84

0.72

0 1 2 3 4 5

Circuit Switch Fall Back Delay - Overall

2/3/4G: Short Call

Page 248: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

248 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Accessibility: Telephony Return Delay [sec.]

248

Telephony Return Delay measures the time that a UE uses to re-join the LTE (4G) network after call end

0

1

2

3

4

5

Fayoum Sinuris - Tirsa Bany Swif Wasta Abu Qurqas Menya Asyut Dayrout -Manfalout

Sohag Tahta -Akhmim

Kharga -Fararfra

Nagaa Hamadi- Farashut

Qena Esna Luxor Aswan Kom ombo -Daraw - Abu

Sembele

Telephony Return Delay

0

1

2

3

4

5

Fayoum Bany Swif ElMenya Asyut Sohag New Valley Qena Luxor Aswan

Telephony Return Delay - Zones

0.80

0.71

1.18

0.90

0 1 2 3 4 5

Telephony Return Delay - Overall

2/3/4G: Short Call

Page 249: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

249 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020249

Voice

Speech

Quality

KPI’s

Page 250: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

250 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Speech Quality: MOS Scores

250

0

1

2

3

4

5

Fayoum Sinuris - Tirsa Bany Swif Wasta Abu Qurqas Menya Asyut Dayrout -Manfalout

Sohag Tahta -Akhmim

Kharga -Fararfra

Nagaa Hamadi- Farashut

Qena Esna Luxor Aswan Kom ombo -Daraw - Abu

Sembele

Voice Speech Quality

0

1

2

3

4

5

Fayoum Bany Swif ElMenya Asyut Sohag New Valley Qena Luxor Aswan

Voice Speech Quality - Zones

3.40

3.50

3.36

3.38

0 1 2 3 4 5

Voice Speech Quality - Overall

Page 251: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

251 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Speech Quality: Call technology Usage & Codec Base Usage

251

Call technology Usage represents the call technology

used over call period. The more calls on 3G (UMTS) the

better MOS served.

Codec Base Usage represents the codec used over the call where AMR

wideband (AMR WB) leads to better voice quality experience by the end

user than the AMR Narrowband (AMR NB)

97%

97%

99%

95%

3%

3%

1%

5%

0% 25% 50% 75% 100%

We

Etisalat

Orange

Vodafone

Call Technology Usage Overall

3G

2G

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

AMR NarrowBand

AMR WideBand

HR

Codec Base Usage

Page 252: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

252 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020252

Failed &

Dropped

Calls

Causes

Page 253: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

253 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Analysis: Dropped Calls Causes

253

40%

20%

20%

20%

2G Coverage

2G Quality

3G Coverage

RAN Issue

60%30%

10%

3G Quality

No service

RAN Issue

14%

43%

43%

3G Coverage

3G Quality

RAN Issue

67%

16%

17%

3G Quality

Mobility Issue

RAN Issue

Page 254: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

254 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

All Operators: Dropped Calls Locations 1/2

254

Page 255: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

255 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

All Operators: Dropped Calls Locations 2/2

255

Page 256: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

256 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Analysis: Failed Calls Causes

3%11%

3%

3%4%

11%

36%

11%

18%

3G Coverage

3G Quality

4G Coverage

4G Quality

CSFB Issue

Mobility Issue

No service

Other

RAN Issue

9%

7%

13%

13%35%

2%

21% 3G Coverage

3G Quality

CSFB Issue

Mobility Issue

No service

Other

RAN Issue

2%

2%18%

22%2%16%8%

30%

2G Quality

3G Coverage

3G Quality

CSFB Issue

Mobility Issue

No service

Other

RAN Issue

1%

20%

1%9%

9%

4%30%

4%

7%

15%

3G Coverage

3G Quality

4G Coverage

Core Network

CSFB Issue

Mobility Issue

No service

Other

Paging Issue

RAN Issue

Page 257: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

257 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

All Operators: Blocked Calls Locations 1/2

257

Page 258: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

258 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

All Operators: Blocked Calls Locations 2/2

258

Page 259: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

AGENDA

1. Quantitative Information

2. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Cairo

3. Data Service Quality & Performance – Cairo

4. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Giza

5. Data Service Quality & Performance – Giza

6. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria

7. Data Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria

8. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Delta

9. Data Service Quality & Performance – Delta

10. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Canal

11. Data Service Quality & Performance – Canal

12. Voice Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt

13. Data Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt

14. Annexes

259 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Page 260: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

260 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020260

Data

Service

KPI’s

Page 261: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

261 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Free Mode Throughput Per Test Type

261

NETWORK PERFORMANCE TEST USER EXPERIENCE TEST

-

20,000

40,000

60,000

80,000

100,000

120,000

-

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

20 sec Continuous Download(400 MB file)

15 sec Continuous Upload(200 MB file)

20 MB File Download 2 MB File Upload

Max

imu

m t

hro

ugh

pu

t

Ave

rage

th

rou

ghp

ut

Vodafone Orange Etisalat We Vodafone Max Orange Max Etisalat Max We Max

Page 262: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

262 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

FDTT HTTP Download Transfer Throughput – Network Performance

20643

23771

29944

16757

0 2,500 5,000 7,500 10,000 12,500 15,000 17,500 20,000 22,500 25,000 27,500 30,000 32,500 35,000

400 MB File FDTT HTTP Download [kbps] - Overall

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

40,000

Fayoum Bany Swif ElMenya Asyut Sohag New Valley Qena Luxor Aswan

400 MB File FDTT HTTP Download Throughput [kbps] - Zones

02,5005,0007,500

10,00012,50015,00017,50020,00022,50025,00027,50030,00032,50035,00037,50040,00042,50045,00047,50050,000

Fayoum Sinuris - Tirsa Bany Swif Wasta Abu Qurqas Menya Asyut Dayrout -Manfalout

Sohag Tahta -Akhmim

Kharga -Fararfra

NagaaHamadi -Farashut

Qena Esna Luxor Aswan Kom ombo -Daraw - Abu

Sembele

400 MB File FDTT HTTP Download Throughput [kbps]

Page 263: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

263 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

FDTT HTTP Upload Transfer Throughput – Network Performance

14202

17250

15238

9573

0 1,500 3,000 4,500 6,000 7,500 9,000 10,500 12,000 13,500 15,000 16,500 18,000

200 MB FDTT HTTP Upload Throughput [kbps] - Overall

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

Fayoum Bany Swif ElMenya Asyut Sohag New Valley Qena Luxor Aswan

200 MB FDTT HTTP Upload Throughput [kbps] - Zones

01,5003,0004,5006,0007,5009,000

10,50012,00013,50015,00016,50018,00019,50021,00022,50024,00025,50027,00028,50030,000

Fayoum Sinuris - Tirsa Bany Swif Wasta Abu Qurqas Menya Asyut Dayrout -Manfalout

Sohag Tahta -Akhmim

Kharga -Fararfra

NagaaHamadi -Farashut

Qena Esna Luxor Aswan Kom ombo -Daraw - Abu

Sembele

200 MB FDTT HTTP Upload Throughput [kbps]

Page 264: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

264 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

HTTP Download Session Blocked Rates

1.29%

0.52%

1.76%

0.48%

0% 5% 10%

Download Session Blocked Ratio - Overall

0%

10%

20%

30%

Fayoum Sinuris - Tirsa Bany Swif Wasta Abu Qurqas Menya Asyut Dayrout -Manfalout

Sohag Tahta -Akhmim

Kharga -Fararfra

Nagaa Hamadi- Farashut

Qena Esna Luxor Aswan Kom ombo -Daraw - Abu

Sembele

Download Session Blocked Ratio

0%

10%

20%

30%

Fayoum Bany Swif ElMenya Asyut Sohag New Valley Qena Luxor Aswan

Download Session Blocked Ratio - Zones

Page 265: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

265 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

HTTP Upload Session Blocked Rates

1.37%

0.44%

1.54%

0.40%

0% 5% 10%

Upload Session Blocked Ratio - Overall

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

Fayoum Bany Swif ElMenya Asyut Sohag New Valley Qena Luxor Aswan

Upload Session Blocked Ratio - Zones

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

Fayoum Sinuris - Tirsa Bany Swif Wasta Abu Qurqas Menya Asyut Dayrout -Manfalout

Sohag Tahta -Akhmim

Kharga -Fararfra

Nagaa Hamadi- Farashut

Qena Esna Luxor Aswan Kom ombo -Daraw - Abu

Sembele

Upload Session Blocked Ratio

Page 266: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

266 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

HTTP Download Average Session Setup Time

0.16

0.18

0.18

0.15

0 2 4 6 8 10

Average Session Setup Time [sec] - Overall

0

2

4

6

8

10

Fayoum Bany Swif ElMenya Asyut Sohag New Valley Qena Luxor Aswan

Average Session Setup Time [sec] - Zones

0

2

4

6

8

10

Fayoum Sinuris - Tirsa Bany Swif Wasta Abu Qurqas Menya Asyut Dayrout -Manfalout

Sohag Tahta -Akhmim

Kharga -Fararfra

Nagaa Hamadi- Farashut

Qena Esna Luxor Aswan Kom ombo -Daraw - Abu

Sembele

Average Session Setup Time [sec]

Page 267: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

267 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

HTTP Upload Average Session Setup Time

0

2

4

6

8

10

Fayoum Bany Swif ElMenya Asyut Sohag New Valley Qena Luxor Aswan

Average Session Setup Time [sec] - Zones

0

2

4

6

8

10

Fayoum Sinuris - Tirsa Bany Swif Wasta Abu Qurqas Menya Asyut Dayrout -Manfalout

Sohag Tahta -Akhmim

Kharga -Fararfra

Nagaa Hamadi- Farashut

Qena Esna Luxor Aswan Kom ombo -Daraw - Abu

Sembele

Average Session Setup Time [sec]

0.36

0.20

0.12

0.08

0 2 4 6 8 10

Average Session Setup Time [sec] - Overall

Page 268: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

268 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020268

Throughput

KPI’s Customer

Experience

Page 269: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

269 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

HTTP Download Throughput – Customer Experience

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

40,000

45,000

Fayoum Sinuris - Tirsa Bany Swif Wasta Abu Qurqas Menya Asyut Dayrout -Manfalout

Sohag Tahta -Akhmim

Kharga -Fararfra

NagaaHamadi -Farashut

Qena Esna Luxor Aswan Kom ombo -Daraw - Abu

Sembele

20MB Download Throughput [kbps]

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

40,000

45,000

Fayoum Bany Swif ElMenya Asyut Sohag New Valley Qena Luxor Aswan

20MB Download Throughput [kbps] - Zones

21,946

24,200

29,968

17,835

0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000

20MB Download Throughput [kbps] - Overall

Page 270: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

270 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

HTTP Upload Throughput – Customer Experience

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

Fayoum Sinuris - Tirsa Bany Swif Wasta Abu Qurqas Menya Asyut Dayrout -Manfalout

Sohag Tahta -Akhmim

Kharga -Fararfra

NagaaHamadi -Farashut

Qena Esna Luxor Aswan Kom ombo -Daraw - Abu

Sembele

2MB Upload Throughput [kbps]

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

Fayoum Bany Swif ElMenya Asyut Sohag New Valley Qena Luxor Aswan

2MB Upload Throughput [kbps] - Zones

8,254

9,576

7,690

4,927

0 5,000 10,000 15,000

2MB Upload Throughput [kbps] - Overall

Page 271: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

271 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020271

Browsing

& YouTube

Service

KPI’s

Page 272: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

272 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Session Failure Ratio

272

0%

10%

20%

Fayoum Sinuris - Tirsa Bany Swif Wasta Abu Qurqas Menya Asyut Dayrout -Manfalout

Sohag Tahta -Akhmim

Kharga -Fararfra

Nagaa Hamadi- Farashut

Qena Esna Luxor Aswan Kom ombo -Daraw - Abu

Sembele

Session Failure Ratio

0%

5%

10%

15%

Fayoum Bany Swif ElMenya Asyut Sohag New Valley Qena Luxor Aswan

Session Failure Ratio - Zones

1.33%

1.13%

2.03%

1.38%

0% 5% 10%

Session Failure Ratio - Overall

Page 273: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

273 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Session Time

273

0

5

10

Fayoum Sinuris - Tirsa Bany Swif Wasta Abu Qurqas Menya Asyut Dayrout -Manfalout

Sohag Tahta -Akhmim

Kharga -Fararfra

Nagaa Hamadi- Farashut

Qena Esna Luxor Aswan Kom ombo -Daraw - Abu

Sembele

Average Session Time

0

2

4

6

8

10

Fayoum Bany Swif ElMenya Asyut Sohag New Valley Qena Luxor Aswan

Average Session Time - Zones

4.47

5.00

4.64

4.01

0 2 4 6 8 10

Average Session Time - Overall

Page 274: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

274 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Session Failure Ratio

274

0%

10%

20%

Fayoum Sinuris - Tirsa Bany Swif Wasta Abu Qurqas Menya Asyut Dayrout -Manfalout

Sohag Tahta -Akhmim

Kharga -Fararfra

Nagaa Hamadi- Farashut

Qena Esna Luxor Aswan Kom ombo -Daraw - Abu

Sembele

Session Failure Ratio

0%

5%

10%

15%

Fayoum Bany Swif ElMenya Asyut Sohag New Valley Qena Luxor Aswan

Session Failure Ratio - Zones

1.75%

1.37%

2.47%

1.30%

0% 5% 10% 15%

Session Failure Ratio - Overall

Page 275: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

275 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Session Time

275

0

2

4

6

8

10

Fayoum Sinuris - Tirsa Bany Swif Wasta Abu Qurqas Menya Asyut Dayrout -Manfalout

Sohag Tahta -Akhmim

Kharga -Fararfra

Nagaa Hamadi- Farashut

Qena Esna Luxor Aswan Kom ombo -Daraw - Abu

Sembele

Average Session Time

0

2

4

6

8

10

Fayoum Bany Swif ElMenya Asyut Sohag New Valley Qena Luxor Aswan

Average Session Time - Zones

2.45

2.40

2.30

2.18

0 2 4 6 8 10

Average Session Time - Overall

Page 276: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

276 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Session Failure Ratio

276

0%

20%

40%

Fayoum Sinuris - Tirsa Bany Swif Wasta Abu Qurqas Menya Asyut Dayrout -Manfalout

Sohag Tahta -Akhmim

Kharga -Fararfra

Nagaa Hamadi- Farashut

Qena Esna Luxor Aswan Kom ombo -Daraw - Abu

Sembele

YouTube Session Failure Ratio

0%

20%

40%

Fayoum Bany Swif ElMenya Asyut Sohag New Valley Qena Luxor Aswan

YouTube Session Failure Ratio - Zones

3.15%

1.50%

3.71%

0.70%

0% 1% 2% 3% 4%

YouTube Session Failure Ratio - Overall

Page 277: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

277 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Freezing Time [msec]

277

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

Fayoum Sinuris - Tirsa Bany Swif Wasta Abu Qurqas Menya Asyut Dayrout -Manfalout

Sohag Tahta -Akhmim

Kharga -Fararfra

Nagaa Hamadi- Farashut

Qena Esna Luxor Aswan Kom ombo -Daraw - Abu

Sembele

Freezing Time

0

1,000

2,000

Fayoum Bany Swif ElMenya Asyut Sohag New Valley Qena Luxor Aswan

Freezing Time - Zones

446

121

126

98

0 200 400 600 800

Freezing Time - Overall

Page 278: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

278 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Video Quality

278

0

1

2

3

4

5

Fayoum Sinuris - Tirsa Bany Swif Wasta Abu Qurqas Menya Asyut Dayrout -Manfalout

Sohag Tahta -Akhmim

Kharga -Fararfra

Nagaa Hamadi- Farashut

Qena Esna Luxor Aswan Kom ombo -Daraw - Abu

Sembele

Video Quality - VMOS

0

1

2

3

4

5

Fayoum Bany Swif ElMenya Asyut Sohag New Valley Qena Luxor Aswan

Video Quality [VMOS] - Zones

4.03

4.06

4.05

4.07

0 1 2 3 4 5

Video Quality [VMOS] - Overall

Page 279: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

279 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Time to 1st Picture

279

0

2

4

6

8

10

Fayoum Sinuris - Tirsa Bany Swif Wasta Abu Qurqas Menya Asyut Dayrout -Manfalout

Sohag Tahta -Akhmim

Kharga -Fararfra

Nagaa Hamadi- Farashut

Qena Esna Luxor Aswan Kom ombo -Daraw - Abu

Sembele

Time to First Picture [s]

0

2

4

6

8

10

Fayoum Bany Swif ElMenya Asyut Sohag New Valley Qena Luxor Aswan

Time to First Picture [s] - Zones

2.36

2.03

2.07

1.93

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

Time to First Picture [s] - Overall

Page 280: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

280 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020280

Image Resolution

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

1088 720 480 360 240 144

Youtube - Image Resolution

Page 281: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

AGENDA

1. Quantitative Information

2. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Cairo

3. Data Service Quality & Performance – Cairo

4. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Giza

5. Data Service Quality & Performance – Giza

6. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria

7. Data Service Quality & Performance - Alexandria

8. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Delta

9. Data Service Quality & Performance – Delta

10. Voice Service Quality & Performance - Canal

11. Data Service Quality & Performance – Canal

12. Voice Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt

13. Data Service Quality & Performance – Upper Egypt

14. Annexes

281 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Page 282: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

Call Blocked Rate: (licensed KPI)

The percentage of unsuccessful call setup attempts to the total

number of call attempts in a specified period.

Threshold value = 2 %

Call Dropped Rate: (licensed KPI)

The percentage of dropped or interrupted calls without the

subscriber’s permission after successful call establishment to the

total number of successfully established attempts.

Threshold value = 2 %

Bad Speech Voice Quality Rate: (licensed KPI)The percentage of bad speech voice calls (less than 2.8) scored on MOS score which is a measure for end-to-end (mouth to ear) speech quality of a voice service call to the total number of completed calls. Threshold value = 10 %

CSFB Call Setup Failure Rate (licensed KPI)The ratio between unsuccessful CSFB Call setup attempts to all successful CSFB Call setup attempts for the calling UE.Threshold value = 4 %

Call Access: (non-Licensed KPI)Represents the period of time elapsed from the sending of a complete destination address (target number) to the setting up of a call to the receiving terminal.

CSFB Delay: (non-Licensed KPI)Represents the period of time to overlay 3G/2G environment instead of handling calls in 4G (LTE). Depending on the CSFB strategy.

Telephony Return Delay: (non-Licensed KPI)Measures the time that a UE uses to re-join the LTE (4G) network after call end

KPI definitions - Voice KPIs

282 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Page 283: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

Session Blocked Rate: (Licensed KPI’s)

The Percentage ratio of number of data sessions setup that failed

to attach on the network data domain to the total number of

sessions.

Average Session Setup Time: (Licensed KPI’s)

The time taken in seconds to access network data domain

averaged over all sessions.

Average http download throughput: (Licensed KPI’s)The average rate of successful data downloaded over a communication channel. The throughput is measured in bits per second (bit/s or bps).

Average http Upload throughput: (Licensed KPI’s)The average rate of successful uploaded data over a communication channel. The throughput is measured in bits per second (bit/s or bps).

YouTube Session Failure: (Non-Licensed KPI’s)Stream session failure rate in percentage equal Total number of Streams / Total number of failed Streams .

Freezing Time: (Non-Licensed KPI’s)Average freezing during stream in miliseconds. The relative amount of freezing in the stream, that is, the ratio between the total time of freezings and the video sequence duration.

Video Quality: (Non-Licensed KPI’s)Average of visual quality from an average of visual quality per video stream. The predicted MOS value lies in the range of 1 to 5, where 1 stands for bad, and 5 for excellent stream quality.

Time to 1st Picture: (Non-Licensed KPI’s)Average Time to first picture appear in seconds for the sessions.

Image Resolution: (Non-Licensed KPI’s)The total percentage of Image resolutions using in the clips.

Browsing Session Failure: (Non-Licensed KPI’s)The percentage of failed browsing sessions.

Browsing Session Time : (Non-Licensed KPI’s)Presents the average time needed for browsing (download) a webpage.

KPI definitions - Data KPIs

283 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Page 284: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

Causes Definition will be added

Classification Definition

2G Coverage Weak GSM (2G) Coverage

2G Quality Weak GSM (2G) Quality

3G Coverage Weak UMTS (3G) Coverage

3G Quality Weak UMTS (3G) Quality

4G Coverage Weak LTE (4G) Coverage

4G Quality Weak LTE (4G) Quality

Core Network Problem related to core recourses not radio recourses

CSFB Issue Problem related to transfer the call to lower than LTE (4G) technology

Mobility Issue Problems related to transfer call from one base station to another

No service No service

Paging Issue Problem related to delayed or missing paging

RAN Issue Problems related to grant the radio access

Other Timeouts

284 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Page 285: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

Quantitative Information

Calls License Target value

Call Blocked Rate 2%

Dropped Call Rate 2%

Speech Voice Quality 10%

CSFB Call Setup Failure Rate 4%

285 / 284

Calls License Target value

Session Blocked Rate 10%

Average Session Setup Time 10 Sec

Average http download throughput 2.5 Mbps

Average http upload throughput 1.5 Mbps

National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020

Page 286: tra.gov.egtra.gov.eg/en/industry/quality-of-service/DocLib/NTRA-May-Benchmar… · 4 / 284 National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 10 | April 2020 ا٣دخ

THANK YOU

National Telecom Regulatory Authority | Benchmarking Report No. 11 | May 2020286 / 284