tracking research and research systems
TRANSCRIPT
Tracking research and research systemsChair: Catherine Grout, Jisc
06/07/2016
1
01/05/2023
IntroductionChair: Catherine Grout, Jisc
01/05/2023
Digital scholarship and identifiersGeoffrey Builder, Crossref
01/05/2023
Share updateElliot Shore, Association of Research Libraries
SHARE UpdateJisc/CNI
International Advances in Digital ScholarshipJuly 6, 2016
Elliott [email protected]
Mission
SHARE is a higher education initiative whose mission is to maximize research impact by making research widely accessible, discoverable, and reusable. To fulfill this mission SHARE is building a free, open data set about research and scholarly activities across their life cycle.
Five System of Action Areas
ARL Framework
Open infrastructure for open access
OA advocacy & policy is more mature than OA infrastructure & implementation
OA implementation infrastructure should be open
MetadataStandards and identifiersCode, platforms, and APIs
The future of open scholarship
“We find ourselves two decades into the transition of research communication from a paper-based endeavor to a web-based digital enterprise, and
well into the transition of the research process itself from a largely hidden activity to one that
becomes plainly visible on the global network.”
Herbert Van de Sompel“Reminiscing About 15 Years of Interoperability Efforts” (DLib Magazine, Nov./Dec. 2015)
“... the world’s repositories need some common application programming interfaces (APIs). This is where SHARE is making huge strides, by pulling together data sets from many of the world’s most-used repositories, such as figshare. In turn, SHARE’s aggregating of data sets can feed discovery of content in sites that may not have the same exposure as figshare or discovery of data from across disciplines. “
Mark Hahnel, figshare
Interoperability through APIs
3Collaborators:
Association of American Universities; Association of Public and Land-grant Universities; Center for Open Science
117Number of SHARE Content Providers (June 2016)
7.5 millionResearch Release Events
Percentage of research release events that include a “contributor’s affiliation name” (i.e. institution) field
1.4
SHARE Notify providers by type
What we’ve learned
Variability and availability of metadataComplexity of institutional policies & workflowPower of community infrastructureOpen data for interoperability
The lifecycle approach
“All scholarly digital research objects—from data to analytical pipelines—benefit from application of these [FAIR data] principles, since all components of the research process must be available to ensure transparency, reproducibility, and reusability.”
Nature. Scientific Data Comment. Wilkinson, et al. “The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship” March 15, 2016.
NotifyProviders ConsumersGather
Phase I: pipeline for normalized notifications
Phase II: Clean, enhance, link
Automation, e.g. subject tagging with machine learning
Expert human curation
SHARE Phase III
IntegrationSystems and workflowsTeaching and learning
ARL Focal Areas Fall 2015
“I am energized by the new directions that ARL is taking”
Committee on Coherence at Scale in Higher Education
Questions?Elliott [email protected]
01/05/2023
Jisc Monitor updateNeil Jacobs, Jisc
Jisc tracking research and research systems
»The typical OA article lifecycle and Jisc services»Outline of Jisc Monitor services»Some data flows for Monitor Local, and flavour»Some data flows for Monitor UK, and a flavour»Timeline from now
01/05/2023Title of presentation (Insert > Header & Footer > Slide > Footer > Apply to all) 30
OA through an article lifecycle
Title of presentation (Insert > Header & Footer > Slide > Footer > Apply to all)
Submission Acceptance Publication Use
SHERPA JULIET
SHERPA RoMEO
SHERPA REF R&D:Beta
SHERPA Fact
Monitor UK R&D:Alpha
Jisc collections
OpenDOAR
Publications Router R&D:Alpha
Monitor local R&D:Alpha
CORE
IRUS-UK
RIOXX
Guidance, consultancy, technical support, and OA good practice
Research publication lifecycle
Jisc services
Report on complian
ce
Deposit in
repository
Manage costs
Check complian
ceSelect Journal
Maximise impact
Record impact Report
OA through an article lifecycle
Title of presentation (Insert > Header & Footer > Slide > Footer > Apply to all)
Submission Acceptance Publication Use
SHERPA JULIET
SHERPA RoMEO
SHERPA REF R&D:Beta
SHERPA Fact
Monitor UK R&D:Alpha
Jisc collections
OpenDOAR
Publications Router R&D:Alpha
Monitor local R&D:Alpha
CORE
IRUS-UK
RIOXX
Guidance, consultancy, technical support, and OA good practice
Research publication lifecycle
Jisc services
Report on complian
ce
Deposit in
repository
Manage costs
Check complian
ceSelect Journal
Maximise impact
Record impact Report
OA through an article lifecycle
Title of presentation (Insert > Header & Footer > Slide > Footer > Apply to all)
Submission Acceptance Publication Use
SHERPA JULIET
SHERPA RoMEO
SHERPA REF R&D:Beta
SHERPA Fact
Monitor UK R&D:Alpha
Jisc collections
OpenDOAR
Publications Router R&D:Alpha
Monitor local R&D:Alpha
CORE
IRUS-UK
RIOXX
Guidance, consultancy, technical support, and OA good practice
Research publication lifecycle
Jisc services
Report on complian
ce
Deposit in
repository
Manage costs
Check complian
ceSelect Journal
Maximise impact
Record impact Report
OA through an article lifecycle
Title of presentation (Insert > Header & Footer > Slide > Footer > Apply to all)
Submission Acceptance Publication Use
SHERPA JULIET
SHERPA RoMEO
SHERPA REF R&D:Beta
SHERPA Fact
Monitor UK R&D:Alpha
Jisc collections
OpenDOAR
Publications Router R&D:Alpha
Monitor local R&D:Alpha
CORE
IRUS-UK
RIOXX
Guidance, consultancy, technical support, and OA good practice
Research publication lifecycle
Jisc services
Report on complian
ce
Deposit in
repository
Manage costs
Check complian
ceSelect Journal
Maximise impact
Record impact Report
Jisc Monitor: Two separate but integrated services
Monitor Local:› Institutions can record
and report data relating to their OA publications– Costs (APCs)– Policy compliance– Status in workflow
› Cloud application, interfacing with local and third party services
Monitor UK:»Shared application
aggregating and presenting data analytics
»Institutions and funders can evaluate cost and compliance data
»Working toward international view
June 2016
36
Some data flows for Monitor Local
June 2016
37
Some data flows for Monitor Local
June 2016
Journal and funder policy data
Repository / article data
Article-level metadata
Journal-level metadata
Correct and complete data, via API??
Licence data
38
A flavour of Jisc Monitor Local
June 2016
39
Some data flows for Monitor UK
June 2016
Monitor UK
Monitor Local
Lantern / OA Gauge
Jisc Collections
Other university systems / spreadsheets / etc
Research funders
40
A flavour of Jisc Monitor UK / 1
June 2016
41
A flavour of Jisc Monitor UK / 2
June 2016
Timeline from now
01/05/2023Title of presentation (Insert > Header & Footer > Slide > Footer > Apply to all) 42
Pilot
Handover
Live
To July
From August
From September
23 pilot universities
From Sero et al, to in-house Jisc team
Live for pilot universities, phased release for others
43
Find out more…
29.09.2014
Thanks for listening.
Neil Jacobs, [email protected]@njneilj
Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under CC-BY-NC-ND
01/05/2023
Infrastructure and services to track research activityDaniel Hook, Digital Science
Infrastructure and services to track research activity
Daniel W. HookJisc / CNI Conference, Oxford
7th July 2016
Four forces driving academic behaviour
Research: enabling technology
Research: collaboration / internationalism
Government: Social pressure & accountability
Institutions:Professionalisationof research management
How do we locate “research event”?
How do we locate “research event”?
Isn’t funding also part of “location”?
What about Impact?
What else could we be tracking?
Pre-1995 Circa 2005 Circa 2015
University of Cambridge
http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1507607
Research Data Mechanics
Research Data Mechanics
Research Data Mechanics
Research Data Mechanics
Understanding collaboration
Research Data Mechanics & Open DataResearch Data Mechanics of the type that we’ve described is only possible if:
1. People (researchers and administrators) capture data systematically – this means at the point of production wherever possible
2. Identifiers are assigned proactively –again, wherever possible at the point of production
3. Data are made openly available wherever reasonable (modulo ethics etc) –while its nice to have publishers and others do this for you, it’s also possible tobe active in this, e.g. VIVO, Profiles RNS, Dryad, Figshare etc.
4. Ideally, data are made available in structured open APIs.
Thank [email protected]
Tracking research and research systems
06/07/2016
60