top 10 consultation mistakes and how to avoid them

27
consultationinstitute.org Top 10 29 October 2014

Upload: fraser-henderson

Post on 17-Jul-2015

33 views

Category:

Government & Nonprofit


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

consultationinstitute.org

Top 10

29 October 2014

consultationinstitute.org

Housekeeping!

@TCInews

• Fire exits & facilities…• Documentation etc• Phone etiquette • Twitter?

consultationinstitute.org

The Consultation Institute Not-for-profit; Best Practice organisation; founded 2003

Consultation & Public Engagement ‘Think Tank’

UK…& beyond

Centre of Excellence

CPD1,020+members

Quality Assurance

Advanced Practitioner

Certificate (APC)Centre for Communications &

Consultation Research

Consultation-related events

eg #TCI11 Conference 22 October 2014

consultationinstitute.org

10

Missing Mandatory Considerations

Equalities Impact Assessment

consultationinstitute.org

Missing Impact Assessment

Legal requirement

• Not complete• Done retrospectively

consultationinstitute.org

Secretary of State for Education

Versus

Luton BC, Nottingham CC, Waltham Forest LB, Newham LB, Kent CC, Sandwell MBC

Cancel “Building Schools for the Future”

• Ministers are not “above the law”

Birmingham City Council versus “R”

Changes to social care policy

consultationinstitute.org

9

Survey Error

Wrong questions/bad design

consultationinstitute.org

Survey Error

Can skew entire consultation

• No framing questions• No narrative / out of context• Too complex• Broken logic

consultationinstitute.org

8

No scope/scope creep

No clarity/focus shift

consultationinstitute.org

No scope/scope creep

Lack of clarity about what can and can’t be influenced

• Creates confusion• Helps focus evaluation• Clouds key issues• Less meaningful

consultationinstitute.org

7

Public meeting shambles

Wrong venues/badly managed

consultationinstitute.org

Public meeting shambles

Mismanagement

• Poor facilitation• Venue choice (parking?)• Format• Inequalities

consultationinstitute.org

6

Poor publicity

Wrong audience, no visibility

consultationinstitute.org

Poor publicity

Missing voices, poor participation rates

• Can create inequalities• Not reviewed• Not proactive

consultationinstitute.org

5

Disclosure

Closed facts

consultationinstitute.org

Save our Surgery Ltd

Versus

The Joint Committee of PCTs

Avoid closure of Cardiac Unit at Leeds Infirmary

• Did not reveal sub-scores from panel• Refused requests for information on scoring

consultationinstitute.org

Disclosure

Consultation does not allow for intelligent consideration

• Missing information• Two-way disclosure• Transient stages

consultationinstitute.org

4

Managing stakeholders

Social media

consultationinstitute.org

Managing stakeholders

Inform, feedback cycle

• Identification of key ones• Social listening & intelligence• Dealing with complaints• Missing voices

consultationinstitute.org

3

Fair interpretation

Conscientious consideration

consultationinstitute.org

Fair interpretation

Balanced & honest findings

• Perceived bias (credibility)• Presentation of results• Improper analysis tools

consultationinstitute.org

2

Data handling

Collecting & considering evidence

consultationinstitute.org

Data handling

Balanced & honest findings

• Dealing with qualitative data• Activity evidence• Coding

consultationinstitute.org

1

Predetermination

Burden of proof & transparency

consultationinstitute.org

Predetermination

Honest integrity

• Stepping back• Preferred options• Pre-consultation• Honey trap

consultationinstitute.org

Parting dale Lane Residents Association

Versus

London Borough of Barnet

Order to re-open previously closed road

• Elected member speeches and emails said it would happen

• Evidentiary value of emails etc. in establishing that decision maker had made up their mind

consultationinstitute.org

Top 10

29 October 2014