tmdl development for the floyds fork watershed watershed hydrology and water quality calibration and...

32
TMDL Development for the Floyds Fork Watershed Watershed Hydrology and Water Quality Calibration and Water Quality Model Calibration Technical Advisory Committee Meeting #2 Louisville, KY September 6 th , 2012

Upload: barrie-adams

Post on 18-Dec-2015

219 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: TMDL Development for the Floyds Fork Watershed Watershed Hydrology and Water Quality Calibration and Water Quality Model Calibration Technical Advisory

TMDL Development for the Floyds Fork Watershed

Watershed Hydrology and Water Quality Calibration

andWater Quality Model

Calibration

Technical Advisory Committee Meeting #2

Louisville, KYSeptember 6th, 2012

Page 2: TMDL Development for the Floyds Fork Watershed Watershed Hydrology and Water Quality Calibration and Water Quality Model Calibration Technical Advisory

Presenters

• Tim Wool National TMDL Expert Water Quality Modeler, TOM

• Brian Watson Director, Water Resources Group Tetra Tech, Atlanta

Page 3: TMDL Development for the Floyds Fork Watershed Watershed Hydrology and Water Quality Calibration and Water Quality Model Calibration Technical Advisory

Updates Since TAC Meeting #1• Received more data and incorporated into watershed

and instream model• Performed sensitivity analysis on sinkholes• Updated watershed model calibration• Updated watershed modeling report (REV4)• Updated instream model calibration• Updated instream modeling report (REV1)

Page 4: TMDL Development for the Floyds Fork Watershed Watershed Hydrology and Water Quality Calibration and Water Quality Model Calibration Technical Advisory

Summary of Data Sources• KDOW

– Lat/Longs for 73 NPDES Facilities and 11 Water Withdrawals– Lat/Longs for 49 Water Quality sites (26 USGS, 11 Currys Fork WBP, 7

MSD, 3 Bullitt WBP, 2 KDOW)– Water Withdrawal Information (Lat/Longs and pumping data)– KDOW Management Decisions Document. This document contained

key information about expectations of the TMDL effort.– MS4 Information– Lat/Longs for 33 Assessment Points in watershed– Preliminary information on Water Quality Targets for Floyds Fork

watershed

• USGS– Flow Data for Period of Record at 7 Stations – Water Quality Chemistry Data for 2007 and 2008 for 26 stations.

Page 5: TMDL Development for the Floyds Fork Watershed Watershed Hydrology and Water Quality Calibration and Water Quality Model Calibration Technical Advisory

Summary of Data Sources• MSD

– Information for Weather Stations (TR and RG Stations). – Water Quality Chemistry Data. This includes data for 5 stations for the

period of record.– Sonde data at 5 Locations– Floyds Fork Action Plan Update– Septic Tank Shapefile for Floyds Fork Watershed.– Links to key Water Quality Synthesis Reports and other online

documents– SSO Information and data– 11 GIS Coverages including contours, Dfirms, etc.

Page 6: TMDL Development for the Floyds Fork Watershed Watershed Hydrology and Water Quality Calibration and Water Quality Model Calibration Technical Advisory

New Data Sources since TAC#1• Sinkholes• Springs• Land Use Nutrient Application Rates

– Corn and Soybean– Golf Courses

Page 7: TMDL Development for the Floyds Fork Watershed Watershed Hydrology and Water Quality Calibration and Water Quality Model Calibration Technical Advisory

Sensitivity Analysis on Sinkholes• Received document on Curry’s Fork watershed• Contacted NRCS for coverage• Performed sensitivity analysis on number of sinkholes

– Current dataset has 132 acres (<0.1%)– Increased area by 10x (1,320 acres or <1.0%)

Page 8: TMDL Development for the Floyds Fork Watershed Watershed Hydrology and Water Quality Calibration and Water Quality Model Calibration Technical Advisory

Springs• Received location and flow data from USGS• 20 identified springs• Utilized Kentucky Geologic Survey data for water

quality concentrations• Significantly improved hydrology calibration,

particularly baseflow numbers

Page 9: TMDL Development for the Floyds Fork Watershed Watershed Hydrology and Water Quality Calibration and Water Quality Model Calibration Technical Advisory

Non-Point Source Application Rates• Corn and Soybean application rates and yields

– NRCS– Jefferson and Oldham County– Confirmed rates with Kentucky Corn Growers (August 22, 2012)

– Rates much lower than those published in KY tonnage reports

• Golf Course application rates– Superintendent of Golf Courses for the Louisville Metro

Parks and Recreation Department who manages nine Metro Golf Courses in the Louisville area, two of which lie in the Floyds Fork Watershed.

– Incorporated into Grassland landuse.

Page 10: TMDL Development for the Floyds Fork Watershed Watershed Hydrology and Water Quality Calibration and Water Quality Model Calibration Technical Advisory

Water Quality Model• Water Quality Analysis

Simulation Program (WASP)• Dynamic Simulation• Full Eutrophication Kinetics• Parameters simulated

– DO– BOD– Ammonia– Nitrate-Nitrite– Organic Nitrogen– Organic Phosphorus– Ortho Phosphorus– Chlorophyll a– pH

Page 11: TMDL Development for the Floyds Fork Watershed Watershed Hydrology and Water Quality Calibration and Water Quality Model Calibration Technical Advisory

Linkage to Water Quality Model• Calibrate LSPC Watershed Model • Removed Point Sources, SSO’s, Water Withdrawals,

Non-failing septics and Springs from the watershed model

• Run watershed model to get Land Use only outputs• Use WRDB to process LSPC outputs into WASP inputs• Processed Point Sources, SSO’s, Water Withdrawals,

Non-failing septics, and Springs to be input into WASP• Create WASP input file• Calibrate WASP model

Page 12: TMDL Development for the Floyds Fork Watershed Watershed Hydrology and Water Quality Calibration and Water Quality Model Calibration Technical Advisory

Land Use Flows and Concentrations

LSPC

WASPPS, SSOWD, NFS, S

Linkage to Water Quality Model

Rates and Constants

Met. Data

Page 13: TMDL Development for the Floyds Fork Watershed Watershed Hydrology and Water Quality Calibration and Water Quality Model Calibration Technical Advisory

WASP Segmentation• Floyds Fork and its tributaries were divided into a series of

computational segments.• A BASINS/WASP plug-in user interface was used to carry out

the segmentation. Used NHDPlus flowlines.• A maximum and minimum travel time was specified to divide

the waterbody into segments of desirable length.• Few segments were also aggregated or divided based on the

location of the point sources, flow and water quality stations.• Segments that were not included in the NHDPlus flowline

coverage but included in the LSPC watershed model were added manually.

Page 14: TMDL Development for the Floyds Fork Watershed Watershed Hydrology and Water Quality Calibration and Water Quality Model Calibration Technical Advisory

WASP Segmentation

Floyds Fork Watershed: WASP SegmentsMaps produced by M.Akasapu, 02-07-2012

NAD_1983_UTM_Zone_17N0 3 61.5

Miles

0 3 61.5Kilometers

Jefferson

Bullitt

Spencer

Shelby

HenryOldham

Legend

WASP Segments

Watershed Delineation

County

Page 15: TMDL Development for the Floyds Fork Watershed Watershed Hydrology and Water Quality Calibration and Water Quality Model Calibration Technical Advisory

WASP Segmentation

68

69

70

42

43

41

66

67

64

99

44

46

81

75

63

78

40

77

73

74

79

82

30

39

62

98

61

53

59

60

31

57

58

38

50

54

56

97

206

55

107

71

45

49

100

29

72

33 36

28

32

52

47

35

101

105103

80

104

106102

48

51

3465

Floyds Fork Watershed: WASP Segments, TopMaps produced by M.Akasapu, 01-10-2012

NAD_1983_UTM_Zone_17N

Shelby

Henry

Oldham

0 1 2 3 40.5Kilometers

0 1 2 3 40.5Miles

250

248

245

246

244

214213

212

210

211

207

226

225

215

217

223220

222

247

249

252257

243

254

253

241

239

238

237

236

240

242

235

268269

272

273

271

270

267

265263

261

262

264

266

255

228230

232

234

233

231

229

199

197

202198

201

200

224

203 205

216

218

221

207

Legend

Point Source

Flow Calibration Station

WQ Station

WASP Segments

Watershed: Top Portion

County

300

WASP ID

Watershed ID

200

Page 16: TMDL Development for the Floyds Fork Watershed Watershed Hydrology and Water Quality Calibration and Water Quality Model Calibration Technical Advisory

WASP Segmentation

85

9

83

89

26

90

23

154

13

94

95

11

118

137

12687

115

151

128

114

113

116

91

127

135

158

119

122

152

159

16

20

175

140

120

92

15

141

111

19

86

117

25

112

153

22

174

93176

129

24

177

148

108

17

21

14

88

121

130

12

145

147

133

134

27

146

150

84

209

178

131

142

132

149

109

125

143

123

10

124

212

110

138

144

18

Floyds Fork Watershed: WASP Segments, MiddleMaps produced by M.Akasapu, 01-10-2012

NAD_1983_UTM_Zone_17N

Jefferson

Spencer

Shelby

Oldham

0 1 2 3 40.5Kilometers

0 1 2 3 40.5Miles

136 137

135

167

164166

162

163

161

160

158

168

178

177

176

174

179

151

153

154

155

156

157

159

170

171

276

192

191

190

186

193

195

196

278

282

290289

288

287

286

284

285

283

293

296

295294

291

152

275

274

260

277

259

256

258

257

280

279

281182

184

175

172

181

183

185

187189

194

188

165

Legend

300

WASP ID

Watershed ID

200

Point Source

Flow Calibration Station

WQ Station

WASP Segments

Watershed: Middle Portion

County

Page 17: TMDL Development for the Floyds Fork Watershed Watershed Hydrology and Water Quality Calibration and Water Quality Model Calibration Technical Advisory

WASP Segmentation

6

4

2

5

1

8

3

172

165

192

191

171

189

205

169

160 161

155

187

156

190

167200

199

203

173

182

204

184

198

170

201

164

166

179 7

202

181

168

196

186

183

157

162

197

188 180

194193

163

Floyds Fork Watershed: WASP Segments, BottomMaps produced by M.Akasapu, 01-10-2012

NAD_1983_UTM_Zone_17N

Jefferson

Bullitt

Spencer

Salt River

0 1 2 3 40.5Kilometers

0 1 2 3 40.5Miles

300

299

298

297292

302

147

301

150

149

146

148

143

144

141

134

142

140

138

139

132

130

133

121

123

110

102

101

103 104

105

106

107

108

109

117

116

114

115

119

124

125

127

126

122

129

120

112 145

131

Legend

300

200

Watershed ID

WASP ID

Point Source

Flow Calibration Station

WQ Station

WASP Segments

Watershed: Bottom portion

County

Page 18: TMDL Development for the Floyds Fork Watershed Watershed Hydrology and Water Quality Calibration and Water Quality Model Calibration Technical Advisory

• LSPC Flows and Concentrations (Land Use only)– Instream– Overland

• Water Temperature Functions• Meteorological Data

– Wind - Fraction of Daylight– Solar Radiation– Light

• Point Source Dischargers• Water Withdrawals• SSOs• Non-Failing Septics• Springs

Boundary Conditions

Same inputs as watershedmodel

Page 19: TMDL Development for the Floyds Fork Watershed Watershed Hydrology and Water Quality Calibration and Water Quality Model Calibration Technical Advisory

Boundary Conditions

68

43

41

66

64

99

46

81

76

40207

73

74

79

30

39

53

59

31

38

50

97

206

107

71

29

33

36

28

32

52

101

105

103

104

9634

65 37

Floyds Fork Watershed: WASP SegmentsMaps produced by M.Akasapu, 08-20-2012

NAD_1983_UTM_Zone_17N

Shelby

Henry

Oldham

0 1 2 3 40.5Kilometers

0 1 2 3 40.5Miles

Legend

Flow Input

Watershed: Top Portion

County

WASP Segment

Point Source Input

Water Withdrawal Input

Spring Input

Page 20: TMDL Development for the Floyds Fork Watershed Watershed Hydrology and Water Quality Calibration and Water Quality Model Calibration Technical Advisory

Boundary Conditions

9

83

89

19

26

90

23

154

13

95

11

12

118

137

126

151

114

113

116

91

135

119

122

152

159

140

120

92

111

86

25

174

93

129

24

177

17

27

14

88

121

147

133

134

150

84

175

142

149

125

123

110

138

Floyds Fork Watershed: WASP Segments, MiddleMaps produced by M.Akasapu, 08-20-2012

NAD_1983_UTM_Zone_17N

Jefferson

Spencer

Shelby

Oldham

0 1 2 3 40.5Kilometers

0 1 2 3 40.5Miles

Legend

Point Source Input

SSO Input

Flow Input

WASP Segments

Watershed: Middle portion

County

Water Withdrawal Input

Spring Input

Page 21: TMDL Development for the Floyds Fork Watershed Watershed Hydrology and Water Quality Calibration and Water Quality Model Calibration Technical Advisory

Boundary Conditions

6

4

2

5

1

8

3

172

165

192

191

7

171

189

205

169

155

187

190

167

200

199

203

173

182

198

170

166

179

202

181

185

160

197

162

180

193

Floyds Fork Watershed: WASP Segments, BottomMaps produced by M.Akasapu, 08-20-2012

NAD_1983_UTM_Zone_17N

Jefferson

Bullitt

Spencer

Salt River

0 1 2 3 40.5Kilometers

0 1 2 3 40.5Miles

Legend

WASP Segments

Watershed: Bottom portion

County

Flow Input

Point Source Input

SSO Input

Water Withdrawal Input

Spring Input

Page 22: TMDL Development for the Floyds Fork Watershed Watershed Hydrology and Water Quality Calibration and Water Quality Model Calibration Technical Advisory

LSPC output vs. WASP output

Page 23: TMDL Development for the Floyds Fork Watershed Watershed Hydrology and Water Quality Calibration and Water Quality Model Calibration Technical Advisory

LSPC vs. WASPHydrology Calibration – Qualitative

Page 24: TMDL Development for the Floyds Fork Watershed Watershed Hydrology and Water Quality Calibration and Water Quality Model Calibration Technical Advisory

LSPC vs. WASPWater Quality Calibration – Qualitative (TN)

Page 25: TMDL Development for the Floyds Fork Watershed Watershed Hydrology and Water Quality Calibration and Water Quality Model Calibration Technical Advisory

LSPC vs. WASPWater Quality Calibration – Qualitative (TP)

Page 26: TMDL Development for the Floyds Fork Watershed Watershed Hydrology and Water Quality Calibration and Water Quality Model Calibration Technical Advisory

Water Quality Calibration• Calibration period

– January 1, 2001 through December 31, 2010

• 26 USGS Stations– Primary period of data – 2007 and 2008– 8 Main Stem– 18 Tributaries

• 5 MSD– 3 Main Stem– 2 Tributaries (Lower Chenoweth Run)

• Quantitative Calibration• Qualitative Calibration• Focusing on Nutrient Species and Chlorophyll-a

Page 27: TMDL Development for the Floyds Fork Watershed Watershed Hydrology and Water Quality Calibration and Water Quality Model Calibration Technical Advisory

WASP CalibrationCBODU at 03298135

Date

Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

2007 2008

0

10

20

30

40

CB

OD

U,

mg

/L

Measured Simulated

TEMP. at 03298135

05/01/2007 09/01/2007 01/01/2008 05/01/2008 09/01/2008

Date

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Tem

pera

ture

, C

elc

ius

Measured Simulated

DO at 03298135

Date

Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

2007 2008

0

5

10

15

20

DO

, m

g/L

Measured Simulated

Page 28: TMDL Development for the Floyds Fork Watershed Watershed Hydrology and Water Quality Calibration and Water Quality Model Calibration Technical Advisory

WASP CalibrationTN at 03298135

Date

Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

2007 2008

0

1

2

3

4

TN

, m

g/L

Measured Simulated

3 03298135NH at

Date

Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

2007 2008

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

3,

/N

Hm

gL

Measured Simulated

03298135NOX at

Date

Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec2007 2008

0.0

05.

10.

15.

20.

25.

, /

NO

Xm

gL

Measured Simulated

ORGN at 03298135

Date

Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

2007 2008

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

OR

GN

, m

g/L

Measured Simulated

Page 29: TMDL Development for the Floyds Fork Watershed Watershed Hydrology and Water Quality Calibration and Water Quality Model Calibration Technical Advisory

WASP Calibration 03298135TP at

DDDD

Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

2007 2008

.000

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.30

, TP

mg

/L

Measured Simulated

PO4 at 03298135

Date

Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

2007 2008

0.00

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.10

0.12

0.14

0.16

PO

4, m

g/L

Measured Simulated

ORGP at 03298135

Date

Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

2007 2008

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

OR

GP,

mg

/L

Measured Simulated

Page 30: TMDL Development for the Floyds Fork Watershed Watershed Hydrology and Water Quality Calibration and Water Quality Model Calibration Technical Advisory

WASP Calibration

Page 31: TMDL Development for the Floyds Fork Watershed Watershed Hydrology and Water Quality Calibration and Water Quality Model Calibration Technical Advisory

Next Steps• Next TAC Meeting – Address any comments on

modeling reports• Evaluate water quality targets• Begin running scenarios

Page 32: TMDL Development for the Floyds Fork Watershed Watershed Hydrology and Water Quality Calibration and Water Quality Model Calibration Technical Advisory

Questions?