tl 9000 today & benefit of pdr

30
Copyright 2009 QuEST Forum. All Rights Reserved. 1 1 TL 9000 Today & PDR Benefits APAC Best Practices Conference Tokyo, Japan 14 April, 2015 Ken Koffman Global Business Quality Officer & VP Business Excellence - JDSU QuEST Forum Executive Board Director, IGQ & OSWG Liaison

Upload: quest-forum

Post on 13-Aug-2015

41 views

Category:

Technology


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Copyright 2009 QuEST Forum. All Rights Reserved.

11

TL 9000 Today & PDR Benefits

APAC Best Practices Conference

Tokyo, Japan

14 April, 2015

Ken Koffman

Global Business Quality Officer & VP Business Excellence - JDSU

QuEST Forum Executive Board Director, IGQ & OSWG Liaison

TL 9000’sBenefits & Impact

Improves Product Quality & Customer Satisfaction,

Provides a common language

Drives Consistent processes and

measures

Improved efficiency and alignment

Reduce Cost & Waste

A quality mindset of continual improvement in a complex network

of suppliers and supply chains

Standard requirements built upon ISO 9001 and

it’s 8 quality principles. Adds standard metrics

for benchmarking, facilitating

partnerships

Customers

Inte

rna

l

Suppliers

Pa

rtn

ers

hip

s

Quality

Management

System

Over 750 companies are TL 9000 certified at nearly 2000 locations globally2

Copyright 2009 QuEST Forum. All Rights ReservedCopyright

2009 QuEST Forum. All Rights Reserved.

3

TL 9000 Growth

Copyright 2009 QuEST Forum. All Rights ReservedCopyright

2009 QuEST Forum. All Rights Reserved.

4

TL 9000 Registrations by Region

5

TL 9000 Handbooks

• Requirements Handbook R5.5: ISO 9001:2008 plus 92 additional requirements that address

– Planning

– Communication: internal and throughout the supply chain

– Data collection, analysis and use for improvement

• Measurements Handbook R5.0: Defines comparable performance measurements for the Quality Management System implementation, differentiating organizations based on:

– Problem Report handling

– On-Time Delivery

– System Performance (Outages)

– Quality of Hardware, Software, and Services

ISO 9001:2008 ISO 9001:2015 Content

Section Content

Section 1 Introduction

Section 2 Structure

Section 3 TL 9000

Administration

Section 4 Quality Management

System

Section 5 Management

Responsibility

Section 6 Resource

Management

Section 7 Product Realization

Section 8 Measurement,

Analysis and

Improvement

ISO 9001:2008

Copyright 2009 QuEST Forum. All Rights ReservedCopyright

2009 QuEST Forum. All Rights Reserved.

6

ISO 9001:2015

Section Content

Section 1 Scope

Section 2 Normative

References

Section 3 Terms and Definitions

Section 4 Context of the

Organization

Section 5 Leadership

Section 6 Planning for the

Quality Management

System

Section 7 Support

Section 8 Operation

Section 9 Performance

Evaluation

Section 10 Improvement

8

TL 9000 Measurements

• Is TL 9000 Measurement Reporting

Having an Impact?

• Measurement Consistency &

Performance Improvement

• QuEST Forum Industry Reports Tell The

Story

• What about Non-TL Companies?

COPYRIGHT © 2011 ALCATEL-LUCENT. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. ALCATEL-LUCENT — CONFIDENTIAL — SOLELY FOR AUTHORIZED PERSONS HAVING A NEED TO KNOW — PROPRIETARY — USE PURSUANT TO COMPANY

INSTRUCTION

9

Metric Attribute

Without TL 9000 With TL 9000

Priority & Importance

More Internally Focused, Less Uniform Customer Inputs

Determined Through Operator/Supplier Collaboration

Metrics Quantity Too Many “Similar” “Vital Few”

Metrics Definition Too Many “Similar” Well documented rules

Data Credibility Uncertain – Unknown Rules & Validation

More confident - Validation, 3rd

party audits, errors checks

Benchmarking Ability

Expensive, inefficient,Snapshot in time

Much Less Expensive, monthlyForum industry avg., WIC & BIC

Technology Variants

Not Well Defined Calculations based on ~140 TL 9000 product categories

Infrastructure Cost

High – to address too many “similar” measures from different standards, customers

Lower – as industry continues to

move to TL 9000 measures

Drives Improvement

Difficult due to above Very Likely – and accelerated by joint cust/supplier QIPs

TL 9000 Helps Drive Metric Consistency, Improvement While Reducing Infrastructure Costs

10

Has TL 9000 Improved Industry Quality?

With TL 9000 in its 2nd decade, are

TL 9000 certified companies

demonstrating:

Improved Quality?

Improved Performance?

To answer these questions QuEST Forum Started the

Performance Data Report (PDR) Strategic Initiative to:

Analyze 3rd Party Data

Compile and Publish Industry Reports

Project is ongoing, to-date 10 reports have been published –

“Abridged” Highlights Follow

Details can be found at:

http://questforum.org/resources/industry_reports.html

Improve Member Satisfaction with Performance Data

And Performance Data Reports (PDRs).

EB SI #5 - PDR Improvement Project OverviewTasks

• Data Anomaly

Investigations

• Advisors/Error Checks

• Product Category

Verification Process

• Industry Reports

• Normalization Floors

• “How To” White Paper

Updates

• Continued Workshops

At BPC’s

• Regional Webinar

Delivery

• Agreement with EB #3

For Goal/Path Forward

•Identify Holes

•Identify Potential

Registrants

• Identify “Similar” PC’s

• PC Aggregation

Initiative #1

Improve PDR Accuracy,

Create Industry Reports

Initiative #2

Maximize PDR

Usage Value

Initiative #3

“Fill The Pipe”, i.e.

Expand PDR Scope

Su

rvey

Feed

back

Init

iati

ves

TL 9000 Industry Reports

Copyright 2009 QuEST Forum. All Rights ReservedCopyright

2009 QuEST Forum. All Rights Reserved.

12

• Network Field Maintenance Study

• Wireless Infrastructure Product Family Trends

• Then and Now: On-Time Delivery Measurement Study

2009 vs. 2013

• Repair Service Trends Study

• Network Operator Quality Improvement Trends Study

• Quality Improvements in Simple and Complex Wireless

Devices Study

• Edge Router Product Category Trends Study

• Wireless Return Rate Study

• Problem Report Fix Response Time Study

• On-Time Delivery Measurement Study

All Ten Industry Reports can be found on the

QuEST Forum Web Site

Wireless Study

Copyright 2009 QuEST Forum. All Rights Reserved Copyright

2009 QuEST Forum. All Rights Reserved.

13

Three Wireless Product Categories

• 3.3.2.1-Basic (2G) Base Transceiver Systems

• 3.3.2.2-Advanced (3G) Base Transceiver Systems

• 3.3.2.3-(4G) LTE Base Transceiver Systems

Measurements studied:

• YRR (One Year Return Rate)

• SPR2 (Major Software Problem Reports)

• FRT2 (Major Fix Response Time)

• OTI (On Time Item Delivery)

14

Wireless Study

4G SPR2 IA Improving; 2G and 3G have mature IA

00.00010.00020.00030.00040.00050.00060.00070.00080.0009

Maj

or

Soft

war

e P

rob

lem

Re

po

rts

Pe

r N

etw

ork

Ele

me

nt

pe

r Y

ear

Month

SPR2 Industry Average Trends

Linear (3.3.2.1 (2G)) Linear (3.3.2.2 (3G)) Linear (3.3.2.3 (4G))

Major Software Problem Report Industry Average

15

Wireless Study

4G Approaching 2G and 3G Major Fix Response Time

GO

OD

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

% F

ix R

esp

on

se T

ime

Month

FRT2 Industry Average

3.3.2.1 (2G) 3.3.2.2 (3G) 3.3.2.3 (4G)

Major Software Fix Response Time Industry Average

Investigation Letter Trial Example (PC 1.2.2)

16

Dear TL 9000 Registration Administrator,

It has been brought to the attention of the QuEST Forum Sub-team charged with monitoring and improving the

TL 9000 data reports that there is a problem with the return rate reporting for Product Category 1.2.2 Access

Multi-Service. The specific issue is there is at least one organization reporting return rates that are extremely

high. This is evident in the Worst-In-Class values for all four of the return rates, but is most evident for ERI

where the value is running over 200% per year. This would mean that on average each new unit is returned

twice within six months of shipment. Since it is highly unlikely this could be true, we are asking all

organizations with TL 9000 Certification in this product category to verify the FR data that they are submitting

before your next data submittal.

Specifically, please verify the following:

1. Only returns received during the month being reported are being counted

2. Each return is included in one and only one basis population

3. The is no factor applied to the number of returns, the actual count is being reported

4. The denominator includes all units shipped that belong to the basis population

If you find there has been an error in your data reporting, you are required to correct and resubmit your data

for up to the last 24 months.

This letter is being sent to all organizations certified in Product Category 1.2.2 and to your Certification

Bodies. The Certification Bodies are asked to confirm that the organization has verified their TL 9000 return

rate data during their next audit. In the interim, the organization shall confirm to QuEST Forum that this

verification has been performed within 30 days of receipt of this e-mail. Failure to do so will result in the

suspension of your TL 9000 Certification until your confirmation has been received.

If you have any questions, please use the “Contact Us” function on the tl9000.org web site.

Thank you for your co-operation in this matter. Correcting this issue is essential in order to provide useful

comparable return rate data for the organizations in this product category.

QuEST Forum TL 9000 Administrator

1.2.2 Example Continued –Investigation Letters Resulted in ERIRates Returning to Typical Levels

Copyright 2009 QuEST Forum. All Rights ReservedCopyright

2009 QuEST Forum. All Rights Reserved.

1724 letters sent, plus reminders as needed.

A few acknowledged issues and resubmitted data.

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

5/2011 8/2011 11/2011 2/2012 5/2012 8/2012 11/2012

1.2.2 ERI

ERI Moved to typical

levels after

resubmissions

Asking Companies to Check Their Data When Anomalies Occur, Can Improve Data Accuracy

18

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

4/2

012

5/2

012

6/2

012

7/2

012

8/2

012

9/2

012

10/2

012

11/2

012

12/2

012

1/2

013

2/2

013

3/2

013

4/2

013

5/2

013

6/2

013

7/2

013

8/2

013

9/2

013

10/2

013

11/2

013

12/2

013

1/2

014

2/2

014

3/2

014

Change in 7.6.1 OTI Worst in Class

NEW WorstInClass

OLD WorstInClass

While Anomalies can occur for valid reasons, if one seems completely

unreasonable, report it via “Contact Us” and the PDR Team will investigate.

19

Correct?

Category added to profile

QF approval noted in profile

Pop-up asks for info

Info Complete?

No

Yes

Verification team notified

Info Sufficient?

No

Yes

Request for more info

No

Yes

Feedback to organization

Info received

1) Description

2) Product name and/or model number

(hardware/software products –

Families 1-6 and 8)

3) Primary function (hardware/software

products – Families 1-6 and 8)

4) Competitors products name or

model numbers (hardware/software

products– Families 1-6 and 8)

5) Link(s) to material on web

6) Attach brochure(s)

A New Product

Category Approval

Process Has Been

Approved to Improve

Product Category

Selection Accuracy –

Useful PDR Whitepapers

• PDR Usage

• PDR Measurements Outputs and

Calculations

• Product Category Selection

• TL 9000 Data Submission

Methods

Copyright 2009 QuEST Forum. All Rights ReservedCopyright

2009 QuEST Forum. All Rights Reserved.

20

COPYRIGHT © 2011 ALCATEL-LUCENT. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. ALCATEL-LUCENT — CONFIDENTIAL — SOLELY FOR AUTHORIZED PERSONS HAVING A NEED TO KNOW — PROPRIETARY — USE PURSUANT TO COMPANY

INSTRUCTION

21

Answer:

How Would You Know?

Non-TL companies generally don’t use TL measures

Some “claim” to provide TL data but - Their data processes are not subject to 3rd party audit

They do not submit data to the Forum

Benchmarking them is difficult and expensive

Have NON – TL 9000 Certified Companies Improved?

22

Benchmarking with TL 9000 Data

If You Are Not using QuEST Forum

TL 9000 Benchmark Data …..

are you driving at night without headlights?

With demonstrated real time industry

improvements of 30%, 75% even 130%

for some measurements –

Do you know if you’re making the right

improvement investments, or are your

competitors passing you by?

Make sure you are headed

In the right direction!

Contact Information:

Ken KoffmanJDSU+1 (240) [email protected]

Copyright 2009 QuEST Forum. All Rights Reserved.

124

Backup Slides

ISO 9001:2015 Status Update

25

CD available 2013

DIS available 05/2014

FDIS expected AFTER 07/2015

ISO 9001:2015 to be published

09/2015

3-Year Transition Proposed

ISO Stan

dard

s Develo

pm

ent P

rocess

IAF Informative Document - Transition Planning Guidance for ISO 9001:2015

Published

TC 176 SC 2/WG 23 Communication & Product Support – Ashok Dandekar

(QuEST Forum Representative)

International ballot on the DIS closed on Oct. 10, 2014 –Results were APPROVE DIS by 90%

ISO/NP TS 9002 “Guidelines for the application of ISO 9001” may be

published in 2015

“Key” Detailed Changes:

• New version of Figure 1; ISO 9001 still follows PDCA

• “documented information” remains

• “procedures” and “records” are not mentioned instead “maintain documented information” and “retain documented information”

• A quality manual and a management representative are no longer required

• “products and services” replaces products• ISO 9000 will be updated to address changes in terms & definitions

• “applicability” replaces “exclusions”

• risks are to be determined and addressed, but there is no requirement for formal risk management or risk approach

• New/different requirements from ISO 9001:2008 include organizational context and knowledge management

• Annex A to provide general guidance on implementation and other Annexes will be included such as a summarized analysis of key enhancements between ISO 9001:2008 and ISO 9001:2015

26

ISO 9001:2015 Key Changes

TL 9000 Industry Report #10Network Field Maintenance Study

Copyright 2009 QuEST Forum. All Rights Reserved Copyright

2009 QuEST Forum. All Rights Reserved.

27

7.3.1 Product Category

Measurements studied:

• NPR4 (Problem Reports)

• FRT4 (Fix Response Time)

• OFR4 (Overdue Fix Response Time)

• OTI (On Time Service)

• SQ (Service Quality)

• SSO (Support Service Caused Outages)

28

On Time Service Industry Average

Approaching 100% in 2014

50

55

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

% O

n T

ime

Se

rvic

e

Month

7.3.1 On Time Service Industry Average

7.3.1-IA

Linear (7.3.1-IA)

29

Service Quality Industry Average

Improving to less than 0.5%

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

% D

efe

ctiv

e S

erv

ice

Tra

nsa

ctio

ns

Month

7.3.1 Service Quality Industry Average

7.3.1-IA

Linear (7.3.1-IA)

2014 TL PDR Investigations Conducted

30

Product

Category Name Issue # of Certs. # Responded Suspended

Dropped

Cert

Still

Suspended

Reported

Corrected

Data

3.2.5

Fiber to the

User FR - WIC 18 17 0 1 0 1

7.6.1

Procurement

Services OTI - WIC 16 15 0 1 0 1

3.1.1.1.1

Metallic

Conductor

Cable NPRs 19 17 4 0 2 4

3.1.1.2.1

Fiber Optic

Cable NPRs 28 26 6 0 2 7

Tracking of Investigation Responses is Currently Done Manually.

The Team Is Considering Mechanized Methods Going Forward.

No Response Has

Resulted in

Suspensions!