ting xu and wei gong - transcending the boundaries of urban commons
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Ting Xu and Wei Gong - Transcending the Boundaries of Urban Commons](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042906/589bf6571a28ab40348b6459/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Transcending the Boundaries of Urban Commons – Villages within the City in China
•Ting Xu and Wei Gong•School of Law, University of Sheffield•[email protected]; [email protected]
![Page 2: Ting Xu and Wei Gong - Transcending the Boundaries of Urban Commons](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042906/589bf6571a28ab40348b6459/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
British Academy International Partnership and Mobility Scheme ‘Diversifying Ownership of Land?: Communal Property in the UK and China’, 2014-2017http://www.communalpropertyresearchnetwork.org/
![Page 3: Ting Xu and Wei Gong - Transcending the Boundaries of Urban Commons](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042906/589bf6571a28ab40348b6459/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
The trilogy of ownershipHeller, 2008, The Gridlock Economy, p.33. figure 2.4
![Page 4: Ting Xu and Wei Gong - Transcending the Boundaries of Urban Commons](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042906/589bf6571a28ab40348b6459/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
A mixed property regime
Eg, A Lehavi, the Construction of Property Norms, Institutions, Challenges, Cambridge University Press, 2013.
![Page 5: Ting Xu and Wei Gong - Transcending the Boundaries of Urban Commons](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042906/589bf6571a28ab40348b6459/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Private Property v. Communal Property?
• ‘the sole and despotic dominion which one man claims and exercises over the external things of the world, in total exclusion of the right of any other individual in the universe’.
W Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England, Volume I, Of the Rights of Persons (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1766) 2.
• Emphasis: The right to exclude; individual ownership• Individual ownership equals private property? • ‘Private property is inclusive of individual property, but the
converse does not hold’ (Krier, 2009, ‘Evolutionary Theory and the Origin of Property Rights’, p. 145). • Communal Property as the opposite property regime? • Group access communal property also embodies the right to
exclude.
![Page 6: Ting Xu and Wei Gong - Transcending the Boundaries of Urban Commons](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042906/589bf6571a28ab40348b6459/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Open access commons v. group access commons
•Open access commons: everyone in the world has a right to use the resource; no rules regarding access/entry and exit•Group/limited access commons: a group of
commoners can exclude outsiders but cannot exclude each other within that group; rules regarding entry and exit; the right to exclude; strong homogeneity•Group/limited access commons as a hybrid property
regime where private property and communal property co-exist.
![Page 7: Ting Xu and Wei Gong - Transcending the Boundaries of Urban Commons](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042906/589bf6571a28ab40348b6459/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Definition of communal property
• ‘land and other resources owned and/or used and controlled by a self-interested and self-governing group of people defined by reference to some common characteristics such as kinship, locality, or common interest’. • A Clarke, ‘Integrating Private and Collective Land Rights:
Lessons from China’ (2013) 7 Journal of Comparative Law 177, 181.
![Page 8: Ting Xu and Wei Gong - Transcending the Boundaries of Urban Commons](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042906/589bf6571a28ab40348b6459/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Construction of Communal Property
Resources: used communally or collectivelyInstitutions governing the resource (communities at
different scales, held together by common characteristics eg, kinship, locality, or a variety of bonds eg, sense of belonging, values, ideologies, common interest); interactions between communities, individuals and the state; social interactions, bringing people in ‘property’)
Rules (access/entry, exit, use, control, conservation, sharing, self-governing; from the grassroots rather than simply imposed from the top)
Rights and claims to communal property
![Page 9: Ting Xu and Wei Gong - Transcending the Boundaries of Urban Commons](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042906/589bf6571a28ab40348b6459/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
What if the rules regarding entry and exit are relaxed, and strong homogeneity is broken down…
![Page 10: Ting Xu and Wei Gong - Transcending the Boundaries of Urban Commons](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042906/589bf6571a28ab40348b6459/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Ownership in post-Mao China
•Civil law-making in the post-1978 era has to a significant extent returned to the German Civil Law framework•A tri-ownership system has evolved:state ownership collective ownershipprivate ownership
Public ownership
![Page 11: Ting Xu and Wei Gong - Transcending the Boundaries of Urban Commons](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042906/589bf6571a28ab40348b6459/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Collective ownership
• Property Law (2007), Chap VArticle 59: ‘The immovables and movables collectively owned by the
farmers belong to the members of the collective.’• Article 10 of the Land Administration Law (2004) and Article 60 of
the Property Law (2007) provide that collectively owned land should be managed and administered by the village collective economic organisation (not clearly defined in law), the villagers’ committee (administrative villages), villagers’ teams or a town or township.
![Page 12: Ting Xu and Wei Gong - Transcending the Boundaries of Urban Commons](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042906/589bf6571a28ab40348b6459/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
![Page 13: Ting Xu and Wei Gong - Transcending the Boundaries of Urban Commons](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042906/589bf6571a28ab40348b6459/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
The right to use
•Ownership and the right to use•The right to use: the right to access/not to be
excluded
![Page 14: Ting Xu and Wei Gong - Transcending the Boundaries of Urban Commons](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042906/589bf6571a28ab40348b6459/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Fragmentation of use rights to rural land
Collective ownership
Use rights
Attached to identity as farmers, members of the collectives
Rural households(rights to farming)
Individual farmers, Rural households, collective
economic organisations(rights to construction)Include: use rights to
Residential plots(rights to housing)
Transfer/lease?
Informal norms
Unintended consequences: the emergence
of de facto property
markets and villages within
the city
![Page 15: Ting Xu and Wei Gong - Transcending the Boundaries of Urban Commons](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042906/589bf6571a28ab40348b6459/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Conclusion
•urban commons as a hybrid property regime with open boundaries?
•Thank you!
•Comments and questions welcome!