three waters: auckland as a maritime city

7/28/2019 THREE WATERS: AUCKLAND AS A MARITIME CITY

1/76

PB/1

AUCKLANDAS AMARITIME

CITY

www.committeeorauckland.co.nz

THREE WATERS


2/76

Foreword 2

who are we? 3

PurPose why have we commissionedthis rePort? 4

structure oF this document 5

descriPtion oF the harBours 7w/hk G 7mk hb 9Kp hb 10

executive summary 11

PART ONE: LIVE 13introduction: the harBourscontriButionto aucKlands identity 14

n p b 14

m g: m g pb 15

water, land and transPort:oPPortunities, issues and trade-oFFs 17

a 17a 19n : pp g, kg b? 19ag p 20

marine environment:oPPortunities, issues and trade-oFFs 21

hb p-r 22

education and research 23e r 24r & p 24cg 25

PART TWO: WORK 27introduction:GrowinG the aucKland economy 28

Ports oF aucKland:lonG term PlanninG needed 29

o 29a P ak 30

tourism: underutilisation, oPPortunitiesand trade-oFFs 32

o 32ak 32c p

33

e-t 33c t 34

B wk 35t g 36mk hb 36Kp hb 37

aquaculture: oPPortunities, issuesand trade-oFFs 38

e Pp 38s Pp 39e Pp 39

commercial FishinG 42c Fg 43

Boat BuildinG and marine retailinG 44sp- 44

events: americas cuP and Beyond 45

tidal enerGy 46e Pp 46

mineral extraction 48

e Pp 48

s e 48i 50wk n h 50t (p ) 50e 50cg 51


3/76

2/1

Contents

PART THREE: PLAY 53introduction: First-world leisure andliFestyle 54

w hb 54

hk G 54mk hb 54Kp hb 54a 55

FishinG & BoatinG 56r Fg 56r bg 56w 56

events 57

cg 57overall conclusions 58

PART OUR:THE RECOMMENDATIONS 59

recommendation one: urGent need Forone marine sPatial Plan For all threeharBours 61

recommendation two: council andcentral Government to review currentGovernance arranGements 62

recommendation three: aucKlandcouncil to commence with urGencythe second staGe oF the unisa study 64

reFerences and data 65

dp hb 65P o: l 65P t: wk 65P t: P 66P F: r 66

acKnowledGements 67

committee For aucKland Board 68

committee For aucKland memBers 69


4/76

OREWORDThe Committee or Auckland ocuses on programmes andprojects that will have the greatest transormational eecton making Auckland a dynamic and ullling place to live,work and play.

w bk pg p ak w hb/hk G, mk Kp hb b b 2030,ak gg p g. opp g b 33%, g pp. y pg , .

ak pz b. t . F , ak c s. a g b g g g k, pp ak ad g. y, g , k b g.

a pp g, b b

b p .

w g p p; p b p ; pp k f g ; b p g p; - g b pb; P ak g b g b-p

ak p g .

t pp, -. w p, p akc G g. t c ak pp kg pg , bg g b b b g p, p g .


5/76

2/32/3

WHO ARE WE?The Committee or Auckland is a not-or-protorganisation with a vision to make Aucklandone o the worlds great places in which tolive, work and play. We are an independent,evidence-based thought leadershiporganisation promoting innovative approachesto a range o comple issues.

w b g pj k p p ,, ak p b pp k p b ak n Z.

w k p pp b b, g -g g, gp p - gg pg g.

o g b b b p p b b pp b ak gp k, p.

w g g ak c, g g, k k p msp P p p ak P. ak ppg ak worlds most liveable city.

t c kg p p hk G msp P. w pj pp p ak P, c t r p b g g m sp P.

u - g b bg g p akb.

i ppg p b p b

p b p b g p mk hb. a p ppg p p g.

w k g pb p .

t c k 12 p b b g m sp P.

w k bg b pp ppg , , ak b k g, gg, .

h sExece Deco, Coee fo Aclad


6/76

PurPose why have we commissioned

this rePort?Since its inception in 2004, the Committee or Auckland haspresented key issues aecting the development o a successuland thriving international city. Much o our work over recent timeshas ocussed on the need to streamline Aucklands governancestructure to optimise the regions development.

w b, ak P p p p, b p ak .

i , t wg p i b bg g pg pp.

i 2011 b ak c pg aku ak P b ak g p b. t bp ak , , , , pg g p k.

w p t w: ak m c p p gg ak c G p ak j b.

t p gp pp, p - b, pp g .t - pp p. ag p m spP hk G, b m sp P

b p p b g gbj.

w b pg g b g ak n Z.


7/76

4/5

structure oF this document

PArt OnE: LivE:exae e oppoe ad e aod lg o Acladabo, glg e ade-off ee deco ago eole oe e ad ae ecoedao aodgoeace, acce o e ae, eoeal e adedcao.

PArt twO:wOrk:loo a defg e oppoe fo gog e Aclad ecooad pog be ad eploe ocoe. te Coeebelee geae ad cleae ae plag eeded f Aclad o oe foad a ne Zealad ol gfca globallcoeced c.

PArt thrEE: PLAy:addee e eceaoal oppoe e ejo o Aclad eeabo ad e ece fo copoag Aclade bgof fee ad ea acce o e ae e plag fo fedeelope.

PArt FOur: thE rECOmmEnDAtiOnsoffe ee e ecoedao o a ceag a popeofe fo e abo, Aclad, bee ad cze.


8/76

: bp


9/76

6/76/7

descriPtion oF the harBours

waitemata

The sea approach to Auckland down the Rangitoto Channel culminates in a starboard turn into~180 km2 o the Waitemata Harbour. The Waitemata Harbour orms the north and east coasts o theAuckland isthmus. It is well sheltered rom ocean storms by the outer islands in the Hauraki Gul.

t p . w m b k ( g) b p m p p. agg t w--- ( ) b gg .

t w hb g b b g , f b, p , b .

t b pp b b, b p, b w, b b z b-p ak . t b pp b gb p b b b p p ppg g p b .

t g p g p . h, b

p g b b b g . s w hb p b b p.


10/76

hauraKi GulF

The Hauraki Gul (area ~4,000 km) lies between the eastern side o north Auckland and the westernsides o the Coromandel Peninsula and Great Barrier Island.

t g g g w hb: P i,wk i, t mg rg i, mp i b . t p b tk s rgc. o g B i (mk), m i, Pk i,Pk i, rk i r i g; tk i j wk;

mk i wg i c P; l B c i g. a hk G , F t. B hk P, b w Pk r. t hrg c P F.

m g hk G m Pk (hGmP) 1.2 ,g hk G, w hb, F t cP. w b m F t.

t pk b b g Fb 2000. w pg g g, hk G m Pk a 2000 b g bj

g . t pg a p g g , g p bpp, p i, g. mg pp akg p b g , , , b -ppg p .


11/76

8/9

manuKau harBour

The Manukau Harbour is to the southwest o the Auckland isthmus, and opens out into the Tasman Sea.Maori traditions o the Great Migration tell o the canoe Tainui being hauled across the Tamaki isthmusto become the rst o the great canoes to reach the Manukau. The aniety o Hoturoa, Te-Manuka-O-Hoturoa, as he steered Tainui towards the breakers at the harbour entrance, has been suggested asthe origin o the name Manuka, rst applied to the heads, then etended to cover the harbour, andsince corrupted to Manukau. Other suggested derivations include bathing place or sea birds (manu,bird, kau, a swim), place o the wading birds, nothing but birds, and a corruption o the nameo the ubiuitous scrubland plant, manuka.

t mk g n Z b b ( 394 k2) g ~380 k. h, g b b (1,800 ) b bk k g z. a g p b b g b b .

t p f p mk hb gbg b g g pb p, k, g . t f pp18,000 p , p gg b p.

sb b , p () g (b-) . c pg.

t mk hb p p b . i g k.


12/76

KaiPara harBour

The Kaipara Harbour is a large enclosed harbour estuary comple on the northwestern side o theNorth Island. According to Maori tradition, the name Kaipara had its origins in the 15th century whenthe Arawa chie, Kahumatamomoe, travelled to the Kaipara to visit his nephew at Pouto. At a east, hewas so impressed with the cooked root o the para ern, he named the area Kai-para.

t Kp 60 k g p. i g b ( 947 k2 g , 409 k2 p f f ) g ~600 k. t b

~640,000 ( p g).

t Kp hb g z, p , g . s g f Kp, bk,g- b p p g (b) pg z. thb f, b p .

t f b- pp -g g, gb g b g . t Kp p , g pp pp, g , f g .

t Kp hb g b g b g akg p b.

t bk Kp p g g g b b- g, b b , b b dp c n Z tc s.

t Kp hb g i k p bpp g p pg k. i gp pg k g, g p b. t gp, ig Kp hbmg Gp (iKhmG) b gp b 2005 b ng Kk t a Kp. t iKhmG b t u h s t g Kk u, ehg t - ng w ng r Kp. t pp iKhmG p g g g kkg Kphb .

t Kp m h m rk wkk ig sg P a (n2012) p b g g b, -k pp b pp. a , , p Kp hb p b


13/76

This report aims to illustrate the opportunities and issues, the tensions and trade-os that are inherentin managing Aucklands three harbours, the jewels in the Auckland regions crown. It does not seekto solve the many problems aecting governance, commercial development, environmental integrityand recreational utilisation. The report instead aims to highlight the act that our harbour assets areunder-analysed, under-utilised and under-appreciated resources o supreme importance to theregions vision o creating The Worlds Most Liveable City.

we have concluded:

ak pj pp 2 b 2031 p g b.

t p b.

m g t a pb g, gg p pg .

t mk Kp hb g - -pp; b g pp p . om sp P b g.

t -p b pp g g.

mg n dp () g k. a p g dp , . d dp b k, g m w.

P ak b k- k bgk p kg. h, g g ak, p p ak b pp g .

a g pp -g g gb b b p ak c.

the committees central recommendations are:

1. ak c , g, p m sp P

b p pg k kg b :

g , pp b p p ,

p , p .

2. ak c G g g

w, Kp, mk b g hk G.

3. ak c g g unisa P s. ip, p k p g g

ak, g p b p ak b

pp .

ExECUTIVE SUMMARY

10/1110/11


14/76


15/76

12/1312/13

PART ONE:

LIVE


16/76

introduction: the harBours contriBution

to aucKlands identityAucklands international and domestic identity is based around its three harbours: Waitemata,Manukau and Kaipara. These three waters make Auckland uniue among large modern cities.Auckland Councils ambition is to create the Worlds Most Liveable City, a goal the Committee shares.Liveability reuires proper governance to ensure its assets are managed properly.

i , c g p gg p. i, pp - g , p . e g p k , .

no cohesive Plan For maritime activities across all three harBours

t p b. Pg p k g , p .

t ak c j pb u P p p pg b. t c b m sp P b b k g.

sp b pg p, p P ak p , . t bg b b . i , b p g kg gp Kp mk.

a m sp P g u P. a p b -b ( ) -b k pk, pk pp g b. t k p pp upg p pg p.

t c b b , ,

b g b p ppp g g . ak c, m w, c G g g g .


17/76

14/15

marine Governance: many aGencies are resPonsiBle

t w, hk G, Kp mk g g g g, , g p g. t g g pb g - b -p .

t g p b p pg ak b.

t b kg, g g -g p

g p b .

te agece cel epoble fo o ee ae clde1 (ad o led o):

ak c

dp c

hk G F

ig Kp hbmg Gp

Kp d c2

mk hb F

m n Z

m e

m d

m B, i ep

m P i

m tp

n i w ap r

n rg c3

wg d c4

wk rg c

w ak.

1. t m w kkg gp . a t sng p m w b g g .

2. l g n, Kp wg c p b p m sp P g Kp.

3. ib 2

4. ib 2


18/76

t G g r mg a p pp g() b k b. i G gg b g g b pb. t g pb :

i p pg p, p pg g pb gg, g p.

a k , p-- g p b , p g -kg ,

b bj p pp .

i p g , pp gg p.

a - e c pp / b b p g.

hg g pg , p p.

a k pb kg b p , p g.

ifb pp r mg a p g pp , p pj.

tg g p . t fp, p b, p p.

w p -b , g g b, pg p k. t g, b . i , b b .

i pg G p p b g , pb gg p g p bg , , -bg .

B pp p P F r.


19/76

16/17

water, land and transPort:

oPPortunities, issues and trade-oFFsThe management o Aucklands harbour assets reuires identiyingthe opportunities and the issues aecting public, customary/cultural and commercial use o the waters and managing thetrade-os that are necessary when aced with competing interests.As part o that process, the regulatory authority must ensure there iseective supervision and administration o those assets.

i , g , p b g b.

access to water

t b ak k .

w 300,000 5 ak g g ( ), j pg bg, kkg, g, g g p.

mg k g g.a b c b pp g p g p ak g , g j j p b bg.

t mk hb r s mk. i 2011 akP b, s gg j,b p g b. w ak pp g p p p g , k p p.

t c gg p ( g pg) b g b 2031 p pp pp. t p P p.

5. t g g b p g 20 p pp g.


20/76

TOTAL AUCKLAND REGION

RATIO O ASSETS PER 100,000 PEOPLE ASSUMING NO CHANGE IN THECURRENT NUMBER O ASSETS

ADDITIONAL

REqUIREDBY 2031 TO

MAINTAIN 2011RATIO2011 2016 2021 2026 2031

Boat ramps (number) 10.2 9.5 8.8 8.2 7.7 49

Boat moorings (number) 431.6 402.9 373.5 347.8 325.7 2084

Wharves & jetties (number) 2.2 2.0 1.9 1.7 1.6 10

erry terminals (number) 1.0 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.8 5

Cruise ship berths (length m) 70.4 65.7 60.9 56.7 53.1 340m

Cargo ship berths (length m) 233.2 217.6 201.8 187.8 176.0 1126m

Marine parks (area km2) 269.3 251.4 233.1 217.0 203.2 1300km2

Marine reserves (area km2) 2.1 2.0 1.8 1.7 1.6 10km2

Auaculture arms (area ha) 23.0 21.5 19.9 18.5 17.4 111ha

Coastguard units (number) 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.6 4

Yacht clubs (number) 2.6 2.4 2.2 2.1 1.9 12


21/76

18/19

alternative uses

mg pb ak pp - b g .

P ak g p p 50% pp ak c,g p pb .

t P p wk ,

b.

d gg pb b ak , b , b b .

naval land: oPPortunity For livinG, worKinG or Both?

t dp n. t g g g pp f - bk . sg, b j b n Z g . t .

t n gg k, cp, b g f. t g a sgp -k . a g b cp .

r ng w bg p k , b pb j . t b g j p b k p .


22/76

comment

mg n dp () b - . h pp dp n b g. t dp j ngg B g p b .sb pg pp w q, g dp , .

activatinG water transPorttp p pp 1:100,000. a pp g, b b g pb p.

ak pb p p b b (~75% bg), (~15%) (~10%). t j .

F pg bg , gg pp 350,000 J 450,000 p J (2010), pp 4.8 pg (p ).

w g pp, g p p pb p

p b.

c b g b pp g p. F p, b p s h,tkp, og wk, b p pp(g j bg ). t b kk k b g pg g b .

rg p p p pp b, g , , , g b

g b j .

s: ak tp: Pb tp s cp ( k)


23/76

20/2120/21

marine environment:

oPPortunities, issues and trade-oFFsThe Hauraki Gul Marine Park was created through the Hauraki Gul Marine Park Act 2000 andmanaged by the Hauraki Gul orum, a statutory body responsible or the promotion, acilitation, andintegrated management, protection and enhancement o the Hauraki Gul. Every three years a Stateo the Environment Report is submitted to ministers and other key stakeholders measuring progresstoward achieving the vision o the Hauraki Gul orum which aims or a uture where environmentaluality is maintained and the Hauraki Gul is rich in diversity, with thriving sh and shellsh (kaimoana).It also seeks to ensure that resources are used wisely to grow a vibrant economy and to protect ourcultural heritage.

t p gg g pg gg g, g b pp .

Exaple clde:

t g g ak. a b g F t . G 21 50 g b akc.

F 42 b ak g bJ 2006 ap 2009 g bg . eg g g, , p k.

a b p g b g.

m p g .

s b p g , , g.

a 139 -g p b hkG. F p 10 b p g g : m (sb pz); bb (s ); a Kp (up); Jp b(cb jp). t p.

lg . P p pb g p .


24/76

t p p g g bj hk G m a2000 g g .

te eao aed ae:

eeo o of ffce cale o e

lac of clea eoeal goal

e gap aagee epoe

pleeao gap

fageao

oadbloc.

t s e p p g p ak, g bg g p .

ag k m sp P hk G ,

b p .

t p g b - g p m sp P b. a b pp , , j .

harBour saFety in a Post-rena world

w mv r g ab r (o) B P ob 5, 2011, pp ak c gg k p b.

t k b: J 2013, 19 b p k w b.

a -pp j ak hb f J 2013, bg p g p. e b z, bg , m n Z pp - p. F p p p p. t n p p b .


25/76

22/23

education and researchThe Auckland region has signicant potential to develop a well-coordinated academic programmearound marine research and boat building and enhance current seaaring crew and reight logisticscapability programmes.

t n i w ap r (niwa) g b b g n Z p. niwa k , g , g (B Bg c), p (m e c, b), p g .

t u ak s P c m s (sPcms) lg b G i , b, b k p , b g p . o k p, bg , , pg, pk, g. sPcms pp g g pg g .

u pp g g gpg ( gg, b bg), pp g.

t n Z m s, n Z c m Fg lg tg,

g mk i tg gb g pg g- g g g p.

F 2013, ak u tg (aut) a m cg B egg m egg.


26/76

education and research

in the Future

n Z - p gg, gg , b niwa, autu, u ak sPcms.

c b g pg g k mi tg, u sp, G tu, g gg.

a s n a,j - gk g pbg. w p p $10 , g b pp pg autu, u ak.

research & develoPment

t p b bg, p g p- b n Zg g bg. n Zp pp p

p b bg g ppb c acp m, u ak.

comment

m Pk P t P g n Z - . t k p , pp

g b k sv, s Bk u.

w - p ak pp g .ak b .

t m B ar i p n Z p. i gus$225 p (2004 g)g g, . i bg g b p, g p gg

, n Z gb p.a g-g k k b gp.

a -g pb b g g.


27/76

24/25

concludinG commentary

In this section we have highlighted that Auckland is a growingcity with an additional 500,000 people due to arrive by 2030. Theincrease in population will place signicant pressure on our currentharbour assets and we need to plan or the uture use o the threeharbours. Planning will have substantial benets that will addressknowledge and data gaps, manage tensions between competinguses, and set priority objectives across all three harbours.

t g gp pb gg b. w , g pp. a g g g p.

t pp pg p g p g ppg , g p , gw q k pp dp ,pg bg - , .


28/76


29/76

26/27

PART TWO:

WORK


30/76

introduction:

GrowinG the aucKland economyThe Auckland region is the powerhouse o the national economy. orecast population growth will beconcentrated in Auckland, with our in every ten New Zealanders calling the city home by 2031. Notonly will Auckland be a growing population it will be a younger population compared to other cities inNew Zealand.

w k b pp p g, p g p pp . ak 2012 g 2.8%, g 10- g, g g g gb .

c b p p k b b.

t p , p, g, - p b g g p jb -k p, , g p- p .

ag k, p p g pp k p ( k, b, pb pp k) pb p p. w p 15-19 33.5% 20-24 13.3%, pp g k p . o b b p p .

a, b-bg , g, j gpp .

m , m sp P p g p p p b g p g. cb, b pp f p k g b - pb w m lb c.


31/76

28/2928/29

Ports oF aucKland:

lonG term PlanninG neededoverview

Ports o Auckland has, and continues to be, a dominant activity on the Auckland waterront. A busyand thriving port is an essential part o the economic vitality and vibrancy o the waterront.

t p p g p ak b p m sp P.

t b g b b P ppg b ak n Z p b g p g

30 .

P ak p p b 77 , g 79 2016. i p p p:

g B w b 135 (5.5 p) cp ck w g

g B w b 179 (6.6 p) g cp ck w c pb .

t p p P ak p Pcp upp n i sg a (unisa) p .

comment

The epansion plans are highly controversial and the division o views across Auckland is wellrepresented within the Committees own membership. However, there is consensus that there shouldbe no urther majorreclamation o the harbour or the container port. Major reclamation will lead to asignicant narrowing o the harbour, the impact o which will be elt across a range o commercial andrecreational sectors.

t unisa p gg pp n i p p pj30- g . h, c b p p p g b p. h gg

p k p b 30- z. t p b b pg g .

t p, , g .


32/76

w e eed fo a baal ee e po ad coece apo face oe eex e ea, e eal gae-cagg qeo a old be aed ae:

i b b p ?

a b ?

w pp ?

w b g p

p ?

P ak b k- k bgk p kg.

t pp b b b g , g b p p g , g p g ak . t g b k g.

t g g- ak pg g b .

alternative uses For Ports oF aucKland land

i g , b g p :

p $380 p $1,250 p . r g , , g, p, p g.

t p g pp , p pp ak g b b n Z.

t b pg p b b g p , p b p b p ak.c b g p b pp .


33/76

30/31

comment

t c b b p g ak b ak b g . t ak c P ak p b, g G, j p p, p p p.

a g, c b p. lg- p g b b g

g . t P p, pp g p-- , p k p. t g bk , g.

sg unisa b pp. t c g g pg. t :

g z, b 30-100

p p p

p p

g- p pg p

b p

p p , ,

p g b f p p ( b ).

t b g bg b 30- z, p g k , g pp p ak g .


34/76


35/76

32/33

cruise shiP industry

ak p p , b $190.9 g p (GdP) 2009-2010. d p ak $65.6 b $63 g GdP. t b$346 2010-2011. t b ak 2010-2011 b $180. w p s 10 pg q w, p g p.

P w p p , q w p

p. t $14.6 pg q p 50% bg p p g p 3000 pg.

up-- p g bb b 2010 Pcp p 4,533 pp p g - 2009, 1000 Fte. B 2040, 3,400 b p- p.

ak p k n Z p g p, p g. c p p p ak b g. w pp p ak.

eco-tourism

t g gb -. n Z pp -, pg ak.

ab ak - b-g p, (b g), g p, b p, /g p.ak bg b .

ak pp pp gg - g.

t hk G pg p.

m g hk G m Pk 1.2 , g hk G, w hb, F t c P.w b m F t.


36/76

c b k g pp p g p.

rg k b ak, g g ak .

B i mk p p .

G B ak g g g.

r b s a, pk.

rk , 150 s Gg G b .

h l B b p g pn Z.

t g- - p pg g . F p p b .

s, p mk hb.

t Kp hb g z, p , g . t Kp p , gpp pp, g , f g .

comment

i b g p g. w g, g p, b g g b ak.

og b g p. t p -g k pb, g g p p p . t

p g b .

cultural tourism

ak g pp m g 19 ( ). t p g pp ak g pp .

n Z g . c g p , m g. t g , g, , p p

m n Z.


37/76

34/35

m g k , b p . t p m g g p.

c m p b ak qk- , m mg (/) b mk w g -b b . qk nZ , p k ( b) g , p m. t g m p b , f g b g r, n Zm p.

n Z g gg c k p pp g. t pp pp g g b nZ G c s a, pg pg .

comment

t p pp b p ggp p. t gg gg b pp n Z. a b ppg g g pp g.

Build on waiheKes success

m 195,000 wk 2008 - , 475,000 p p. m .

t b ( gb p) gg p pp g kg g ak p. B pp p, ak u s e.

i g . w gg b wk p p g p g.

t -p , p p g wk , p ak, , , b, kg k k s B g p.

t g h: sp G 10 b p. t n yk t p k -.


38/76

t jzz pp b .

comment

t pp g hk G -b g pg , p.

t Kp mk pp b g .

the Gold card economy

a 700,000 n Z p g g 2007. i p , wk i, b p. n F 13% slk g . l g g 28 Fb 2009 200 p .

ag g p g , b p-pgp b , pg $100 .

a -t g g g

. t p g pp p ak a k, p pkg b b .

manuKau harBour

t b p p mk hb, n Z g b (b 350k2) g p 6.4. dg 2011-2012 , 14 bg b 76% p b g, p 86% 2010-2011. ag kg p , k .Pg mk b b b p p gg pp.

comment

t c bg g g mk ( , Kp). t g gg m sp P g b. a p msp P p, g , kg k ppp g .

t mk hb r s6 b b g , g bg pp.t g g , pgg P og , p og b

p b.

6. t mk hb r s 2011 p mk hb. i b p b wp s h. t s, k g p p b, p g b.


39/76

36/37

Pg p g g . ak c gp ,ak k b g jb, b b mk .

KaiPara harBour

t Kp pp - g b , g b,ggp g g b n Z

g p. Kp p pp, , f g, p p pg g b p,g.

r g j, g b-g , g b p b. a b b g 2007. i b 98% pp pp Kp.

t p b pg b , bb g, , g g, bp , p .

h Kp , g r d c 2003 p p 6% Fte p g g 2.78% GdP. i b 2006 p gg b p Kp hb g , g , gg pp, b , -pb p k b b b g .

comment

ak j b g p .

i b b j pp . t - p pp p g pp ak .

t b b kk- b gg pp ak b.


40/76

aquaculture: oPPortunities, issues

and trade-oFFseconomic PersPective

The auaculture industry has been identied as one with growth potential, both within New Zealandand worldwide. Auaculture is the astest growing sea ood sector with the ood and AgriculturalOrganisation predicting that global consumer demand or seaood will almost double rom 45 to 85million tonnes by 2015. The growth o global sh protein consumption by 2020 will be rom developingcountries- over hal o which will come rom the Asia-Pacic region.

t pp p p, p b gg pg p $1 b b 2025.

i 2008-2009, ak g 2,648 890 . t 3% p 26% p. F p, gp (17,426 ). F pg ak p g g.

a b $72 (2004) p ak 2009. tp $28.2 (2004) g GdP, 0.06 p ak g GdP.

i p, 507 Fte g g.t p 341 g pg jb, 141 jb

, 25 jb g.

i p p 80% n Z , 57% 36% .

i p , p 18% p. G g , g p g , b p g p ak.

t , gg pp , p g p (p , ), b p.

t ak, b g , k . t , p g p. a b .

t p g -b g. aa, g b, gg b b . t p g p pk, p pj, p pp, p .


41/76

38/39

a b p p p k. t p bg p b p k niwa g g, g .

t ak, b g p , k . t , p g p. t b .

t p g b g g g gg g aa, p ( ) b b akg.

a b p p p k. t p bg p b p k niwa - g g, g .

social PersPectives

t p f b b -b pp -b ( p b) g .

sg b k , . t p g, g bg p b p b.

m -b p p p. t p pb , pp , , .

environmental PersPectives

t p b .

F p, b f b - g g. m g g - . sb a k g , p g g . t b .

n p bg g, g kg, pk, pg, ,k, b (g - p ). t p b b, b, b .


42/76

t b pp g p

te codeao ll eed o clde:

t p b g, g pkp, b p, , g b b p.

t p , g g- p , g-

kg p f , g /p .

F z -g -g. o, p, b p - , g .

MARINE AqUACULTURE

PROS CONS

p

p k

b

: p g pg

p: nZ p (57% o harvesteported) & (80%) ~$220 2011;

nZ ~$400 (60% p)

(p ): p.g. kg, pk, pg, , k,

b (g p )

: p ,g , p

: g g ( b k) p gb p, p p (.g. , ), p bb b

g gg -

p g p b p b

p g bg, g,

p , ,pb (.g. g b), pp

g

p b g .g. pkp, b p, , g b b p

p p g , , g kg, p f, p

z g -g, p b p - ,

- b


43/76

40/41

comment

a p g gp. G pp g $1 b b 2025. ak p b g p b . r bg g pp g g g g.

w ak pp g , p b g b

. w b b g , b b p, pp g g , b p p.

G b g gg k pg gg b pg p.


44/76

commercial FishinGThe 4.3m km2 o New Zealands eclusive economic zone and territorial sea is home to around 15,000identied marine species o which 130 are commercially shed by trawling, line shing, net shing,seining, dredging and other methods such as using pots and traps.

t g ak. t g- b p mk w hb g lg.

t q mg s (qms), b m P i, p b g p ggp . a p ggp bg pp. e p qms b p k b q mg a.

n Z 100 p ( p gpg) bj qms. t p 636 p k. e k g p p b . t p g ( b).

t p (gp, , , , g, pp, f),p- (k, k, g, g g, - 70% p- ), (, p, p, , , b) g p (.g. ,).

t $4 b (2009).

t g p pp 1,300 g , 220 p , p 7,155 Fte (1,773 g, 1,086 , 3,678 pg, 616 ).

t j , , ak p ak p b g pg.

mj g f g g p k n t p g .

t b g f g pp g pp. B b p g (s r Fg).


45/76

42/4342/43

customary FishinG

m f pp 30% n Z (50% ). t o K (t mF t) k m pp g .

comment

w p p ak p . c b w q gp k p .a ak w g. lg- p b lg, p

g g.


46/76

Boat BuildinG and marine retailinGThe boat building and marine supplies industry is one o New Zealands largest manuacturing sectors,accounting or 10% o the countrys manuactured goods. It is estimated to generate about $1.7 billiona year, with eports accounting or about $650 million o that gure. Aucklands share is approimately64% or $1.08 billion. The high New Zealand dollar, global nancial crisis and subseuent worldwidedeleveraging has resulted in a slight revenue decline or the sector since 2008 (Auckland: $1.22 billion;nationally: $1.9 billion). But the past two years have seen a recovery, reports the New Zealand MarineIndustry Association, and the new marine industry precinct in Aucklands northwest is set to deliverurther real benets to the boat building sector when complete.

suPer-yachts

w p- n Z g p b b bg g . i 2002-2003, 104 p- ak a cp, b g pg 2000. t p p- b p , k , p .

t p- b g- p gb p . ak p- ,jg 93% k p y 37, p.

comment

t p p: 200 b p 600 pp g 16-21 G ppp pg. n Z g pp bb .

t pp p , p j b bb a cp, b p p p g-, g-k,p- g ak .

o : p g , g p p b bg p. F p

f g g.t b me .


47/76

44/45

events: americas cuP and BeyondThe Americas Cup is once more within reach. The premier international sailing event will take placeon San rancisco waters in July and August this year, with the nals held in September. New Zealand isin a strong position to reclaim the silverware it lost ten years ago.

t g pp, p p p . t b g g: pg $497 2000-2003; $450 ak ; 8,180 Fte jb .

ag j p pg g ($171 ) p ($155 ), pg p b, , p, .

i, b bg p g p b bk g a cp 1995. i pg p p n Z b-bg ,p p- .

t b bb , v o r $15.3 p b p g. t b GdP p jg $50 p .

comment

t , b g b, p g b ak . F p , g , p, g $90 p GdP.

t p g k b a cp b p 2003 p p-pg g b p.


48/76

tidal enerGyTidal energy converts the renewable energy o tides into useul orms o power. Tidal energy may haveadvantages over other sustainable sources because the timing and scale o tidal fows is predictableand underwater turbines are invisible and silent. While the economic costs remain a hurdle, thetechnology represents a signicant opportunity in an undeveloped area o alternative energy sources.

economic PersPective

Kaipara

c eg b g p Kp

hb p g f n Z ( = 1,9903, gf = 2.2 k). t Kp hb p , b p, pp 2-g mk hb, g n Z.

t pj pp 200 b 31-52 p, g 10 k b,g p k g p, f pgp. t pp $600 10 g . t pk p 200mw, pg dc g b g h.t p p 250,000 3% n Z, . t b g (ak n) p p g tp g p.

t pb p g g w mk hb.

Environmental perspective

t g b p 1.8g co2 p kw p 3g co2 pkw, 4.6g co2 p kw, g 6.3g co2 p kw, b g 200-300g co2 p kw, 400-1,000g co2 p kw).

t b b , g b ; j -b b.

h b . c g

b p , b m p, Kp g pp pg g. t p b ( ) p b b g j.

comment

ag b b pg g, g, p g g pp k b g . t pp b b b gpg, p , s P c m s.


49/76

46/47

TIDAL ENERGY

PROS CONS

pb pp

b p: = 1.8 g co2 p Kw( = 3, = 4.6, g = 6.3, b g = 200-300, = 400-1,000)

b b ( )

p bj g

k ppg Kp( , b )

g Kp

p Kp

b gg g g

pj

pp : cb uc a egg - gg g p, g p nZ b gg pb b - p g bj g b: =$600 10 , $200 b p n ak, $200 b

b

pb b , .g. , g b

b- p .g.pp, m p

z b: 25 (k), l eg/r l

k

p b (~7 ) b

b b


50/76

mineral extractioneconomic PersPective

sand extraction

c ( g) p akg. s p ggg p p g, -b p. s g b pj m B.

c g p , . t b g, g p. t g b g pp, pp bg . s g bj bk bg .

Fe coaal pe cel (2007) pode fo ad exaco fo e Aclad coaal ae aea:

p g 76,000 b p (- Pk) p 2,000,000b , b p 1,200,000 b 24- p, ( lB i) p g 400,000 b p , , g g (Kp hb , f ).

c pp 151,000 b p 219,000 b p Kp . s Kp hb b 50% ak.

t b g g b g , p p g k g .


51/76

48/49

SAND ExTRACTION

PROS CONS

b ak g g b g p g g, bg

b .g. m B

p b

g p

gg p g:

b b

, .g.

: b , g pb j pp Kp ( ni pp pp)

, ,f

g - p jb


52/76

iron sand

i g -g p. t p : n h wk r . o t, K ak g; g ak b. t p b 1.44 b . t tk .

waiKato north head

app 5 p p b 1.2 p -g p Gbk 18 k g g pp k g p.

taharoa (exPort only)

t g p pp 1 p -g, / g 3 k g pp g p p bk p a ( Jp, c).

i p pp $30 p 40 Ftep.

environmental eFFects

te eod ad locao of ad exaco ad dedgg a poeal adee eoeal effeccldg:

b b

g b (b) b

f .

c kg (g bg) p, p bg .

h, nZ s p g g .e -g g g . n . t , g, p g . tg p g . m g p p b p b . t g g . t . a p pg bg p b . i , b p.


53/76

50/51

IRONSAND ExTRACTION

PROS CONS

p (wk nh, Gbk)

650,000 p p

5% nZ GdP

Gbk .o .

g p (t)

~ nZ$30 p

g p b 2014

p -g , g

g

g g

ogg g b .s , p p.

comment

s p ak p g b g k kg wk.

w g g p, p g p k pp b. t g p g pp p.


t b p g g ak p p.t , b bg, j p b gp pb b ak g w mlb c.

w gg b b ak g b g. ak p k p.

w pp p p, p ak b . t b b

g gpp .


54/76


55/76

52/53

PART THREE:

PLAY


56/76

introduction: First-world leisure and liFestylewaitemata harBour

t w hb ak . i b g , f b, p b .t g b p b b b p P ak ppg g p b . t b p g b b g . s w hb p b b p.

hauraKi GulF

t hk G p g ggp 1.2 .i pk, , 30 j gp, p g , nZ bgg b, n Z b, p . a g P ak, , , , g, .

manuKau harBour

t mk hb, ak pg

t s, n Z g b. a g p b b, g p g p, k, g , b. t b k p g b p .

KaiPara harBour

t Kp hb g b p n i. t Kp g b , g 60k g p . i g z, p , g . t b p , g pp pp, g

f .


57/76

54/55

access to water

a ak b , . i k .

t pp p b g,g b b bg - b , ak ,

p z -. n, nZ 450,000 , , p , 10% b p.

comment

ak p 10.4 b p p 100,000 pp ,g pj pp, 49 bp b p 20 p ( ).

a, Kp hb g

g p.

RATIO O ASSETS PER 100,000 PEOPLE ASSUMING NO CHANGE IN THECURRENT NUMBER O ASSETS Additional reuired

by 2031 to maintain2011 ratio

2011 2016 2021 2026 2031

Boat ramps(number)

10.2 9.5 8.8 8.2 7.7 49

Boat moorings(number) 431.6 402.9 373.5 347.8 325.7 2084

Wharves & jetties(number)

2.2 2.0 1.9 1.7 1.6 10

erry terminals(number)

1.0 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.8 5

s: c b 2012


58/76

FishinG & BoatinGrecreational FishinG

app 20% n Z pp gg g, b , , , p p. i ak, 300,000 pp, , b p b, b g.

t g b bg7 z b p, gg p, .

t f b g g

. i n Z , p b , g .

t ak pp pp g pp b b . t ppp b p.

recreational BoatinG

a g 450,000 p - n Z 116 g bg b, b ak g. m g pp b. ak c s ( , g 40%

b b 14% ).

m w hk G; , g b mk Kp.

a pp pp pp pp bg. t b p pkg ,, b, g pp

water quality

a l , p ak

b j . o b ak gb J 2006 ap 2009 g. t g , , g b -g p p ak g pg g b.

comment

t k p pp mk Kp , g j b p . ak p g b b z j.

ag k b p .

7. i ak K F mg a bg 20 p .


59/76

56/57

eventso 29 J (ak a ), p 900 z b p g . i g g- g p b.

t p, b g p , p g p $40 p , g , p.

o ak g b p itu w t s.c- g ak t e e dp g pp j pg ak bg $2.1 pp 2013-2014 .

ak p sp c a 2012 l.


ak zg g. o k g. t b p . a k , , b, b p b .


60/76

OVERALL CONCLUSIONSThis report provides a glimpse o the issues, opportunities and trade-os that eist across our three waters. The harbours provide a richresource and an attractive advantage or all to enjoy, in particularas to how we live, work and play. Overall, we have ound that:

t g pb gg,pg pg ak b,g g p, g pg kg.

F pg p b b b. t :

i b b p ?

a b ?

w pp ?

w b g p ?

mg g b b , k g, p p, p g g pb.

t mk Kp hb -p , pp hk G .

t g gp

mk Kp hb.

t b pp b p.

G p p bgg g .

F p b b.


61/76

58/59

PART OUR:THE

RECOMMENDATIONS


62/76


63/76

60/61

recommendation one: urGent need For one

marine sPatial Plan For all three harBoursThe Committee or Auckland notes there is an eisting process underway to develop a Hauraki GulMarine Spatial Plan.

t c ak g c, g g kk p b t r m spP (msP) w, Kp mk hb.

t c gg m sp P p b b p t r pp . i g t r , , .

a g msP pg z, kg gp b, p pp g b p g k. t b g b kg p p p p.

F , b b , ak n Z pg g . hg b p pg b pp kg ak gp k, p.

K msP g p ,

p p , , g k p b b . t b gg kg p p, p, g- p .

ke beef of a msP ae:

g bp

p

g p

b p , , bj

b

p- pp kg

pp g

p b kg

b gg

k pp

f .


64/76

recommendation two: council and centralGovernment to review current Governance

arranGementsThe Committee or Auckland recommends that the Auckland Council and central Governmentcollaborate in reviewing the roles and responsibilities o the many agencies and organisations involvedin the governance o the Waitemata, Hauraki Gul, Kaipara and Manukau Harbours.

ip msP b b gp ppp , p bg bj p.

a p g g bg p, - b ppg , b p , .

t G g p n Z, , -bg. w p r mg a, c b g k b g ak j b. w , g g.

tee ae de o:

i : m g k b hb .

lk g: m k g b hb . a g . t p g g.

K gp g p: k b k gp g -p g b p g ;

ip gp: t g p g pg g g

g g p

Fg: k g g b gg. F p p p g b g g r mg a. t g b pg g ak wk g

rbk: i , p, bk p p .


65/76

62/63

case study:

uK marine manaGement orGanisation

t u Kg m mg og (mmo) b k b b p p uK g , , , p bg .

t mmo -p pb b (ndPB) b g p m c a a 2009. t g-bkg bg g k -kg p .

t mmo p k m F ag (mFa) p , pp - p p p dp eg c cg (decc) dp tp (dt).

t b mmo -g p k pg, gg g p bp.

The MMO has a wide range of responsibilities, including:

pg pg g g , p p ;

pg g g ,p k g ;

gg uK g f p uK ;

kg n eg J n c c (Jncc) g k p ( z ep ) g p b b p uK ;

pg g g g;

pg g pp mmo -kg p.


66/76

recommendation three: aucKland councilto commence with urGency the second

staGe oF the unisa studyThe Ports o Aucklands epansion plans are highly controversial. The Committee believes there shouldbe no urther majorreclamation o the harbour or the container port. Major reclamation will lead to asignicant narrowing o the harbour, the impact o which will be elt across a range o commercial andrecreational sectors.

t P ak bg p p unisa p, b p g ak.

w b p p

, g-gg b k :

i b b p ?

a b ?

w pp ?

w b g p p ?

t b, ak c unisa p k p g g ak, g p b p ak b pp .

P p p .

t c g g pg. t :

g z, b 30-100 .

g p p p

g p p

g- p pg p

b p

p p , , ,

p g b f p p ( b ).

t b g bg b 30- z, p g k , g pp p ak g .


67/76

64/6564/65

reFerences and datadescriPtion oF the harBours

c ak p ak u d d,m 2011 pg 6

Kgk.g.z

s n Z

t a ep n Z

w, B c, n ZGgp s, dp s i r

Part one: live

ak c p://.acladcocl.go.z/En/eeecle/OAclad/edaeleae/Page/coclegeabopoeco.apx

cbg m s, p://.ae.aclad.ac.z/oa/oe/abo/e-ad-ee/e/e/eplae/e_e.jp?cd=493773

c s - r hb a 2012

mk hb r s,sb ak P 2011

m e ipg r mg s: a pg 16.

Pk, m w t P t P:w cg n Z w ad o r G u. 2010

P ak c rP p i d,nb 2011

s G tkp m hkG, s e rp, 2011

Part two: worK

a n Z p://aqacle.og.z/d/oee/

ak c t rp,t e v hk G, nb 2012

ak c, ak c

Pp ak c, B e

ak, ap 2013

ak t, e edp p://beacladz.co/eco/o

ak t, e edp p://beacladz.co/eco/al-deelope

ak t, e e

dp, ak

cb u c a egg 2010

d Pp: F s P ak, c p 2012

p://.pegold.go.z/abo-e-cad/e-pegold-cad.l

mk hb r s,sb lg t rg P

m 2012

m P i asg F y a P spp a, ap 2012.


68/76

m, c.; md, G.; (2010).a: e p ak g. J pp b ak rg c mke l ak rgc. ak rg cd. t rp . 009,2010.

n Z a c (2006),

t n Z a sg.

n Z m i a

n G n rp(2006)

n rg c, b p p

nZ h, 28 sp, 2012

P ak, p; s

b, 21 m 2012

Pc, h g p upp ni? 2012

s ak m rp c mk hb rpg a, J2012

s n Z

t e ip 2003a cp d b mke m t

t pak , Pwc, nb2010

t e v wrp, Pwc, nb 2010

t wk Pj, s e, u ak, m2010

t wk Pj, s e, u ak, m2010

w ak idp P

w d, opp sb e dp Kp hb rg i Pb

P, ak 2006

Part three: Play

ak c, t ev hk G, nb2012

c s r hb a 2012

yg nZ, 2011

Part Four: recommendations m sp Pg a sp b

sp app -b g, iogp c, m G n. 53 icam d n.6


69/76

66/6766/67

acKnowledGementste Coee fo Aclad e o acoledge ad ae follog ebe ogaao fo e og ppo adcoe fo pojec.


70/76

Chairmanr db

Directorse G (dp c)d mc (dp c)a Bkba cr hJ r

P w

Trusteesr dbd mcB mggd rb

COMMITTEE OR AUCKLAND BOARD


71/76

68/69

Becad cGp d P dp Gph, s & rk

BnZ BaP Bh i Bkg

Boffa mell

r lb,d

Capa tppB s,P

te Cofeece CopaJ tk,mgg d

Coope ad Copam ck,

c e o

Coba Cola LdB cb,d

Coe maa Dc heal BoadG m,c e o

Deloed e,s P

E & yogs oc,mgg P

Flece Bldg LedG d,c e c

Fj Xeoxn wk,c e o

AIA NZw B,c e o

AnZ Bamk h,G mg, n c

AsB BaBb cp,

c e o

Aclad Apoc sp,G mg, cp a

Aclad A Feald i,c e o

Aclad Coe Fodaomk B,c e o

Aclad Cocldg mK,c e o

Aclad Dc heal Boada c,c e o

Aclad to, Ee & Ecooc DeelopeB or,c e o

Aclad wa meoal mer c,c e o

Aut uedk mck,v c

Aut ueP J r,dp v c

COMMITTEE OR AUCKLAND MEMBERS


72/76

Ge-s m,G mg, cp c

hea of e Ca sc e o

iAG nZ LdJ J,

c e o

te icehoea h,c e o

Jaaxr h,d

Joe Lag Laalled wgn d v

kbaK K-s,h sp mk, sg dp

k icoe Pope tc Gg,c e o

kPmGP h,c e o

Lego Coacoa s,G mg

Local Goee nZm a,c e o

maa ie of tecologd P B,c e o

mae ued s m,v c

mcCoell Ledd mc,

mgg d

mg re PoeF w,G mg G

m of Foeg Affa & tadeJ a,c e o

me Ello rdd wamk s,mgg P

ne Zealad BZ Fj,c e o

ne Zealad Cocl fo ifaceDevelopmentsp s,c e o

ne Zealad ie of Acecr G,c

Pacfc Be tP cz,c e o

Pee Bole Acec LdP B,d


73/76

70/71

seee veJ v,c e o

todd Pope Gope d,c e o

uec nZd rk e,

c e o

ue of Acladt G,rg

vodafoe nZr s,c e o

te waeoePj ok,G mg, op

waecae sece Ldmk F,c e o

waefo AcladJ dz,c e o

wepac nZP c,c e o

wt Paepsp Gg,d

Pecc Popee nZ Lds P,c e o

PceaeoeCoopeB h,c e o

Pope Cocl of nZc t,

n d

regoal Facle Acladrb d,c e o

rcar y,c e o

saac ad saac nZn B,c e o

spo Geoe G,P

scla kg mezr h,rg mg

skyCity Eeae Gopng m,c e o

so Pacfc PceJ B,mgg d

seeo Gopmk Fk,c e o


74/76

hooa mebe:

Sir Ron CarterP,c ak

Bryan Mogridget,c ak

Diane Robertson,c mak c mt, c ak

Australian Trade Commissionm cc G

Consulate General o Chinan qgbc G

Consulate General o theUnited States o AmericaJ e dg,c G

Consulate General o VanuatumKz K,c G

Salvation Armymj cpb rb,n d

iddal mebe:

Ae Blacbi b

Alaa Caei b

rcad Ddbi b

t c,c ak

sall Gaei b

Dae Je Gbbi b

Dad igi b

C macei b

Pee mezei b

Pee walli b


75/76

72/7372/73


76/76

COMMITTEE OR AUCKLAND

Po B 3403,s s,ak 1140,n Ztp: +64 9 300 1234

.k..z

three waters: auckland as a maritime city

Documents