thomas young’s double slit experiment

34
Thomas Young’s Double Slit Experiment by Charity I. Mulig 1

Upload: gilon

Post on 23-Feb-2016

198 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Thomas Young’s Double Slit Experiment. by Charity I. Mulig. Historical Backdrop. Publication of Christian Huygen’s treatise on light (1690). He believed that there is a medium between the eye and the objects and the object does something to cause an effect in that medium. . - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Thomas Young’s  Double Slit Experiment

1

Thomas Young’s

Double Slit Experimentby

Charity I. Mulig

Page 2: Thomas Young’s  Double Slit Experiment

2

Historical BackdropPublication of Christian Huygen’s treatise on light (1690). He believed that there is a medium between the eye and the objects and the object does something to cause an effect in that medium.

Page 3: Thomas Young’s  Double Slit Experiment

3

Historical BackdropMid 17th century Fransesco Grimaldi observed the bending of light through narrow slits

Page 4: Thomas Young’s  Double Slit Experiment

4

Historical BackdropThe pervading idea of the nature of light is Newton’s Corpuscular Theory (1704). This is despite the fact that he noticed interference fringes on the edges of the prism that he used.

Page 5: Thomas Young’s  Double Slit Experiment

5

Historical BackdropIn 1801 Thomas Young performed his 2-slit experiment. Augustin-Jean Fresnel’s biprism experiment was later conducted in support to Young’s experiment. Fresnel’s experiment to a large extent was responsible for convincing the scientific community of the wave nature of light.

Page 6: Thomas Young’s  Double Slit Experiment

6

Historical Backdrop

In the mid 19th century James Clerk Maxwell publish his famous

equations.

Page 7: Thomas Young’s  Double Slit Experiment

7

Prerequisite Information

Page 8: Thomas Young’s  Double Slit Experiment

8

Electromagnetic Wave• Produced by

accelerating charges• E and B are mutually

perpendicular to their direction of propagation

Page 9: Thomas Young’s  Double Slit Experiment

9

Huygen’s Principle

Drawings from Huygen’s book Treatise on Light.

“The wave fronts of light waves spreading out from a point source can be regarded as the overlapped crests of tiny secondary waves – wave fronts are made up of tinier wave fronts”

Page 10: Thomas Young’s  Double Slit Experiment

10

Huygen’s Principle

Huygen’s principle applied to reflection and refraction of wave fronts.

Huygen’s principle applied to spherical and plane wave fronts.

Page 11: Thomas Young’s  Double Slit Experiment

11

Diffraction

Simple proof of diffraction. Waves are bent at corners and edges. The smaller the opening, the greater the diffraction.

Page 12: Thomas Young’s  Double Slit Experiment

12

Diffraction

The shadow is fuzzier when the opening is narrower.

Page 13: Thomas Young’s  Double Slit Experiment

13

Interference

“…the phenomena that occurs when two or more waves overlap in the same region or space”

Interference patterns of overlapping waves from two vibrating sources.

Young’s original drawing of 2-source (pinholes) interference pattern.

Page 14: Thomas Young’s  Double Slit Experiment

14

Principle of Superposition

“When two or more waves overlap, the resultant displacement at any point and at any instant is found by adding the instantaneous displacements that would be produced at the point by individual waves if each were present alone.”

Page 15: Thomas Young’s  Double Slit Experiment

15

Requirements for …

Constructive Interference Destructive Interference

r2 – r1 = mλ where m is an integer

r2 – r1 = mλ where m is a non-whole number

Page 16: Thomas Young’s  Double Slit Experiment

16

The Experimental Set-up

Page 17: Thomas Young’s  Double Slit Experiment

17

Geometry of the Set-up

Actual Geometry Approximate Geometry

Page 18: Thomas Young’s  Double Slit Experiment

18

Interference Pattern

Destructive Interference

where m = 0, ±1, ±2, ±3,…

Constructive Interference

md sinwhere m = 0, ±1, ±2, ±3,…

21sin md

Page 19: Thomas Young’s  Double Slit Experiment

19

From the geometry of the set-up

But R>>d; θ is very small and we can make the assumption

So that for small angles

tanRym

tansin

dRmRym

sin

Page 20: Thomas Young’s  Double Slit Experiment

20

The wavelength of the light can then be solved as

INTERESTING FACT:The Young’s experiment was the first

direct measurement of light

Rmdym

Page 21: Thomas Young’s  Double Slit Experiment

21

Improvements

• Use of diffraction gratings instead of slits

• Fresnel’s Biprism experiment

Page 22: Thomas Young’s  Double Slit Experiment

22

Intensity of Interference

Pattern

Page 23: Thomas Young’s  Double Slit Experiment

23

Intensity of Each Source

202

1 cEI

where

tEtEtEtE

cos)()cos(

2

1

Page 24: Thomas Young’s  Double Slit Experiment

24

Phasor Diagram for E1 and E2

Using the following relationships:

Cosine law

2cos2cos1 2

21

2cos2

ave

c0

0

Page 25: Thomas Young’s  Double Slit Experiment

25

Solving for EP

2cos2

2cos22

cos12

cos12

cos2

222

22

22

2222

EE

EE

EE

EE

EEEE

p

p

p

p

p

Page 26: Thomas Young’s  Double Slit Experiment

26

Poynting Vector in Vacuum

BxES

1

•Has a direction along the propagation of the wave since the electric and magnetic fields are perpendicular to each other

0EBS

•Its magnitude is equal to the energy flow per unit area per unit time through a cross-section area perpendicular to the propagation direction

“The average value of the magnitude of the poynting vector at a point is called the intensity of the

radiation.”

Page 27: Thomas Young’s  Double Slit Experiment

27

I for Sinusoidal Wave in a Vacuum

cEIS

Ec

EIS

c

andcBIS

kxtBEtxS

then

aa

aa

from

kxtBEtxS

kxtBtxBkxtEtxE

where

txBtxEtxS

ave

ave

ave

02max

0

02max

0

2max

200

max

0

maxmax

2

22

2

0

maxmax

max

max

0

21

21

2

1

)(2cos12

),(

22cos1sin

1cos2sin12cos

)(sin),(

)sin(),(),sin(),(

),(),(),(

0I21I

212avecos

from2

φ2cos0II

2cE02ε0I2

φ2cos2cE02ε2PcE0ε2

1Ithen

2φcos2EpE

substitute

Page 28: Thomas Young’s  Double Slit Experiment

28

I for Interference Pattern

0

2

20

200

220

20

21

21cos

2cos

2

2cos221

2cos2

II

from

II

cEI

cEcEI

then

EE

substitute

ave

P

p

“The intensity of the central bright spot is 4x that of the individual sources

…but the average intensity of the whole interference pattern is just twice the intensity of the individual sources.”

Page 29: Thomas Young’s  Double Slit Experiment

29

Phase and Path Differences

00

0

1212

12

12

2

22

2

nknk

n

rrkrr

rrrr

n

Where•k is the wave number in the material•ko is the wave number in the material•n is the index of refraction•λ is the wavelength of light in the material•λo is the wavelength of light in vacuum

Page 30: Thomas Young’s  Double Slit Experiment

30

Phase and Path Differences

sincos2

cos

sin2sin

sin

22

12

12

dIII

dkdrrk

drrdR

ooIntensity far

from two sources

Page 31: Thomas Young’s  Double Slit Experiment

31

For 2-slit interference, I may also be expressed as…

RdyI

RkdyII oo

22 cos2

cos

Page 32: Thomas Young’s  Double Slit Experiment

32

Bonus!!!Question: What then?Answer:

1. Experiment on electron interference.2. De Broglie Wavelength3. Davisson-Germer Experiment4. Duality of Nature5. Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle

Page 33: Thomas Young’s  Double Slit Experiment

33

Final TriviaThomas Young read fluently at the age of 2; by 4, he had read the Bible twice; by 14, he knew

eight languages. In adult life, he was a physician and scientist, contributing to an

understanding of fluids, work and energy, and elastic properties of materials. He was the first

person to make progress in deciphering Egyptian hieroglyphics. No doubt about it –

Thomas Young was a bright guy!

Page 34: Thomas Young’s  Double Slit Experiment

34

Sources• University Physics by Young and Freedman• Fundamental Physics by Resnick • Conceptual Physics by Hewitt• Beautiful Science:

http://www.huntington.org/exhibitions/beautifulscience/timelines/light_web.html

• Maths.TCD : http://www.maths.tcd.ie/pub/HistMath/People/Huygens/RouseBall/RB_Huygens.html

• Physics 2000:http://www.colorado.edu/physics/2000/schroedinger/electron_interference.html#evidence