this course introduces students on how to write and prepare a research proposal in a systematic...
TRANSCRIPT
FINAL YEAR PROJECT 1KMK 3103
SEMESTER 1 2013/2014
SYNOPSIS
This course introduces students on how to write and prepare a research proposal in a systematic manner. A student proposes or selects a project after discussion and approval of his or her supervisor. Usually, a project is based on a core subject of a program. Although projects may differ between students, students get the same exposure and training when they plan and prepare their research proposal. Discussions with supervisor, presentation of research proposal and writing a research proposal are methods used to meet the learning objectives of this course.
OBJECTIVE
By the end of this course, students will be able to:1. Produce a research proposal which include Chapters One,
Two and Three for a topic area in Cognitive Science, with clear discussions about sections of the chapters such as background, problem statements, research questions, hypotheses, conceptual framework, theories and models, previous research, research articles, research designs, techniques of data collection, sampling, validity and reliability issues and data analysis.
2. Explain and communicate with lecturers and relevant parties about the study, and search at libraries, resource centers, on-line and other sources for relevant information in order to plan about instrument, module, system design or product design that will be developed.
3. Demonstrate the previous research and methodology through individual presentation
TYPE OF PROJECT
1. Common research Quantitative, qualitative or mix
2. System Design and Development 3. Prototype/Product Design 4. Other project type approved by
supervisor
YOUR PLANNING
Early literature survey and review in related field of research
Early meeting and discussion with potential supervisor In a respective semester, at least 6 meetings with supervisor
log book
Individual time management At least 3 hours/week
Data collection Public/private Supervisor’s responsible (letter, communication, etc.)
ASSESSMENT
Report (Chap 1,2,3) = 80%
Presentation = 15%
Aptitude = 5% + log book
Grading (A… C), Above 50%
REPORT (80%)No Criteria % Descriptors1 Adherence to Format & Layout
* Citation & References* Language* Coherence
10
Impressive (10)Good (7 – 9)
Satisfactory (5 – 6)Fair (3 – 4)
Weak (0 – 2)2 Introduction (Chapter 1)
* Background/Context* Problem Statement* Objectives & Research Questions (Hypotheses) * Conceptual Framework* Conceptual & Operational Definitions of Key Terms/Concepts* Significance of Study
30
Impressive (25 - 30)Good (18 – 24)
Satisfactory (12– 17)Fair (6 – 11)Weak (0 – 5)
3 Review of Related Literature (Chapter 2)* Coverage (Breadth & Depth)* Quality of Review (Relevance, Logical Argument)* Theoretical Framework
30
Impressive (25 - 30)Good (18 – 24)
Satisfactory (12– 17)Fair (6 – 11)Weak (0 – 5)
4 Research Design (Chapter 3)* Conceptual Framework* Sampling Procedure* Instrumentation* Reliability & Validity* Procedures for Data Collection & Analysis* Limitations/Delimitations
30
Impressive (25 - 30)Good (18 – 24)
Satisfactory (12– 17)Fair (6 – 11)Weak (0 – 5)
Impressive Good Satisfactory Fair WeakExceptionally clear presentation; all major points sufficiently addressed; very thorough and comprehensive; exemplary work
Clear presentation; almost all major points sufficiently addressed; generally thorough and comprehensive
Generally acceptable, some points sufficiently addressed and some need minor improvement.
May require major revision; include substantial and consistent errors.
Require major revision in almost all major points; include very substantial and consistent error; fail to provide clear presentation.
PRESENTATION (15%)No
CriteriaPoin
tsDescriptors
1 Background of Study/Project Proposed Introduction to topic/area of
investigation (i.e. problem statement, scope of study/project)
Explanation of the purpose of the study/project (i.e. objectives, research questions, hypotheses, potential findings/significance of study, conceptual framework, etc)
Definition of Key Terms/Constructs
9
Impressive (9)Good (6-8)
Satisfactory (4-5)Fair (2-3)
Weak (0 – 1)
2 Related Literature Review of related studies/literature
on area of study/project proposed (i.e. theoretical framework)
9
Impressive (9)Good (6-8)
Satisfactory (4-5)Fair (2-3)
Weak (0 – 1)3 Methodology*
Explanation on method & methodology proposed to achieve purpose/objective of study (i.e. research design, sampling, instrumentation, methods of data collection, data analysis, etc)
(* Based on type of FYP proposed)
9
Impressive (9)Good (6-8)
Satisfactory (4-5)Fair (2-3)
Weak (0 – 1)
4 Oral Presentation Engages attention throughout Well-paced, clear articulation Exhibit confidence, enthusiasm
3Impressive (3)Satisfactory (2)
Weak (0 – 1)
APTITUDE (5%)
Criteria
Exhibit understanding of and capability to undertake the FYP process Demonstrate commitment and determination to complete the FYP successfully Demonstrate capacity for higher order thinking when articulating ideas during
consultation sessions Demonstrate good progress from the beginning of the PTA process
FLOW CHARTMinggu/Tarikh Aktiviti Tindakan
Pembahagian Pelajar-Penyelia Taklimat tentang Prosedur PTA &
Tanggungjawab Pelajar Penyelaras PTA Program
Minggu 1-13 Sesi Penyeliaan: Perjumpaan secara berkala bersama Penyelia
Penulisan Draf PTA 1: Bab 1,2 & 3Pelajar & Penyelia
Minggu 13-14 Seminar Pembentangan PTA 1: Bab 1, 2 & 3 Penyelaras PTA Program,
Pelajar & Penyelia
Minggu 13-16 Penambahbaikan Penulisan PTA 1 (berdasarkan maklumbalas semasa Seminar)
Penulisan Draf Akhir PTA 1 mengikut format yang telah ditetapkan
Pelajar & Penyelia
Minggu 17 Penghantaran PTA 1 ke Pejabat AM FSKPM (jumlah Bab bagi PTA 1 bergantung kepada jenis projek yang dipilih)
*PTA 1 yang dihantar selepas tarikh ini akan diberikan Gred F
PelajarPejabat Am (PP)
Minggu 18 Pemberian Gred kepada Penyelaras PTA Program
Pemaparan Gred pada Papan Notis dan laman web Fakulti (e-markah)
Penyelia
FYP RESEARCH AREA
What? How? When? Where?
COGNITIVE SCIENCE
Cognitive Psychology
Intelligent System
Human Factors
Learning Sciences
Cognitive Neuroscience
Artificial Intelligence
Cognitive Ergonomic
Design-Based Research
Philosophy of Mind
Augmented Reality
Physical Ergonomic
Novice vs Expert learning processors
Virtual Reality Human Computer Interaction
Design Development
21st Century learning
Integration of Teaching to support learning
ANNOUNCEMENT
MORPHEUS Manual Penyediaan Projek Tahun Akhir FSKPM
Key PTA @FSKPM
List of title/area according to cluster
Title/research area Submission date of title/research area before 5PM, 2 MAY 2013 (SELASA)
FYP title/research area form
FYP 2 presentation (13 May – 16 May 2013) Please refer to the schedule at Morpheus/faculty website