this article is downloaded from indian...

Indian H is torians: Notorious or Ignorant More than a hundred years ago, when History of India was written under Britishinfluence, there was no room for Ramayan and Mahabharat as historical events. Theywere epics and of no importance for students. It is surprising that India is one countrywhose history has been written by its enemies and the whole nation yet follows it. Nodoubt the history was a strategic attack on Indian civilization and culture that paved wayfor western culture into the nation. With time, truth is evolving back. Science of Indiathat was denied is now accepted through western influence. The myths are suddenlyappearing to be history. And one such history is Ram Sethu. Since, it is a history ofHindus, politics and literates are not ready to accept it as truth.

Ram sethu bridge near rameshwaram I f they are so intelligent, let them go through this artic le. Ichallenge them through few ques tions mentioned in bold in thisartic le. Let us have a background of what politic ians and his torians(British written his tory literates) say about Ram Sethu. His torian B.D. Chattopadhyay of Jawaharlal Nehru Univers ity saysthe archaeological record says nothing of the sort. There is no

This artic le is downloaded from www.malls tuffs .com

evidence of a human presence in the subcontinent, he says , beforeroughly 250,000 to 300,000 years ago. I t is generally believedman's hominid ances tors did not leave their African home untilabout two million years ago.V ery important point here is that Mr. C hattopadhyay has forgotto note that what is said of hominid ances tors is also a belief - abelief generated by Western people and followed by Mr.C hattopadhyay - not T ruth, not Sc ience. Surely Ramayan, if abelief is a belief of eas tern people - Indian P eople. Mr.C hattopadhyay is trying to introduce a belief c lash. Why Mr. Chattopadhyay wants to defy a true instance with afalse belief? Does Mr. Chattopadhyay want to say that LordRama is deep in the heart of billions of Indians to this datewithout any truth? Can false beliefs f ind so deep root in societyand for so long time?I read a s imilar comment from N Ramanujam. Head, P os tGraduate Department of Geology and Research C entre, V .O .C hidambaram C ollege, Tuticorin. He said that Adam's Bridge is only a chain of shoals between thePalk Strait and the Gulf of Mannar, created by sedimentation owingto long shore currents . Explaining the bridge's geological his tory, hesaid both the Palk Strait and the GoM were once part of the Cauverybas in, which was formed during the separation of India andAntarctica about 70 million years ago during the `Gondwanaperiod.' They were combined till a ridge was formed in the region owing tothinning of earth's crus t. The development of this ridge augmentedthe coral growth in the region. "The coral cover acted as a `sandtrapper' leading to the formation of Rameswaram Is land," Dr.Ramanujam said. The long shore currents on the southern s ide ofis land created a discontinuous shoreline eas tward from Dhanuskodito Talaimannar, which's the Adam's Bridge.


C oral reef near rama bridge Let us see what Mr. Ramanujam has said: How many such Chain of Shoals bridging two nations is known toDr. Ramanujam? Is there any other Geographical constructanywhere in the world - deposits of shoals along the coastdoesn’t say that it bridges two land pieces?A gain Mr. Ramanujam is taking support of another belief to beatthe truth. He is talking of Gondwana theory, a theory that has noconcrete proof - an imaginary thes is with some sc ientific logicbehind it. Hundreds of such theory can be generated based onGeographical princ iples , but that do not defy a concrete reasonof exis tence. Why did Gondwana theory leave a trace of only One Bridge onthe Globe?


V ery important - Ramanujam is unable to change the names oftwo places as Dhanuskodi and Talaimannar which are notEnglish names as they already exis t, and hence success fullyaccepts a controvers ial English name of A dam’s Bridge ins teadof Ram Setu. Mr. Ramanujam could very eas ily put his theorywith the name of the Bridge s till as Ram Setu. But he ends up insaying that is A dam’s Bridge - WHY? Why did Mr. Ramanujam accept Adam’s theory to be correct?Does Mr. Ramanujam want to support that Adam and Eveexisted and Lord Rama didn’t exist? I f yes , then A dam and Eve exis ted in India alone as the bridge isin India - A gain controversy - as Manu Shatrupa would be moreknown names in this region and analogy to A dam and Eve.Moreover, acceptance of A dam’s Bridge is acceptance that itwas build by A dam. A c tually, the logic fits oppos ite to them -how can the firs t man on earth build a bridge of that volume? Hewould be immature at firs t place, he is alone at second place andwhy will he ever endeavor to bridge the sea? Though the onlyevidence is with India, no logic fits to the name as ‘A dam’sBridge’. This c learly reflec ts the C hris tian mentality trying toimpose and kill H indu greatness .


A dam and eve or ( H indu manu and shantarupa) A nd poor H is torians of India, brought up in the education sys temof English, unable to break the boundary of false arrogance ofbeing high literary, seems to be helpless ly saying that Ram SetuBandh is not his torical. They cannot even hold a petty vis ionthat humans have build wall of length of Great wall of C hina thatis vis ible from even Satellite; what would s top humans to buildRam Setu Bandh and what is surpris ing or oppos ing to the fac tthat it was built as a part of Ramayan as a his tory. Does Mr. Ramanujam want to say that if Adam built it, it ishistory, but if Lord Rama built it it is a Myth and a naturalconstruct?P rofessor Dupey says that as per A rcheological survey, remainsfrom A yodhya controvers ial s ite has found temple remains


whose age do not go beyond 600 B.C . Mr. Dubey: Do you want to say that if I build a temple today,you will conclude that Lord Rama existed since today and notbefore?Temples are building and rebuild and their age can only sayabout the age of the temple and the age of the personality whoseworship is done in the temple. We need to unders tand certain points here, modern A rcheologyand Sc ience is far different than what used to exis t in anc ientIndia. For ins tance, old temples of India, yet exis ting, were builton a different technology than what we find in modern c ivilengineering. This doesn’t mean that anc ient archeology was nothaving mathematics maturity - in fac t, if we look at Temples ofIndia, Jagannath P uri temple for ins tance, we do not find any ironor pillars used to build the temple - yet it s tands from hundredsof years to a height of around 200 ft.

Assume that Puri temple would have been razed some 10000years ago, what technology or archeological proofs would bederived to conclude that the temple was 200 ft high? Similarly, the Ram Setu bandh has seen ages , and that too noton land, but in sea - a turbulent sea. The major of the mass is


already washed off - a ques tion to be pondered is that whatremains is jus t a trace of the ac tual bridge - not the whole bridgeas it was . Ramayan mentions that the bridge was built over the sea water,with support of Sea - this implies that there was no supportingarcheology involved in cons truc ting the bridge - this is eas ilysupported by the failure of A rcheology ground to trace suchcons truc ts under ground. Yet the presence of shoals below thebridge and their type indicate that they cannot be found in sea inthe manner it exis ts at Ram Sethu. Now, Mr. Dubey accepts that the age of Shoals found at RamSethu goes around 1 million years . He misguides people, as heis a literate of H is tory written by British, that Ramayan was firs twritten around 10000 years ago and not 1 million years ago. Mr.Dubey, here is a s imple calculation for you to furtherinves tigate: The age of the bridge as per sc ientific dating comes to around 1million years . A s per H indu sc riptures , Ramayan took place in‘T reta Yug’. C alculating by H indu sc riptures (T reta Yug with atenure of 12 ,96,000 years , Dwapar Yug with a tenure of 8 ,64,000 years , Kali Yug has jus t seen 5 ,000 years ): We knowthat T reta Yug was before Dwapar Yug. So, one thing is quiteevident. The Bridge was cons truc ted at leas t 8 ,64,000 yearsago, i.e., 0 .86 million years ago, which is pretty c lose to 1million years . T reta Yuga itself is 1 .3 million years of age.


How is that scientif ic age of the shoals and the Hindu calendarage of Lord Rama matches exactly? Will Mr. Dubey and otherhistorians dare to come out of the falsehood of our enemyteachings and try to explore some mathematics of Hindusbefore they say make such stupid comparison of scientif ic ages?2. Analysis of Valmiki Ramayan over RAM SETHU Now, let us go into the Valmiki Ramayan and dig out more history out of it. Let us besure that if we want to dig history, we have to touch Valmiki Ramayan alone and not anyother Ramayan, because all other Ramayan are written with purpose of promoting


Ramayan and recording the event. Here are certain points from Valmiki Ramayan to be considered: 1. There is no other book than Ramayan that has put into scriptures describing suchgeographical constructs. 2. Ramayan says that it was build under the supervision of an Architect Nala - son ofthe greatest Architect of all times ‘Vishwakarma’ (Note: ‘Vishwakarma’ is a designationgiven to the greatest archeologist and builder of the era in ancient Hindu society, asimilar practice as we have in modern world of ‘Nobel Prize’). Thus, the book makes surethat such a bridge can be constructed by only architect of highest skill.


Luv kush rec iting V almiki ramayana Why do the politicians mislead the nation by saying that LordRama was a Superman who build the bridge, when Ramayanclearly says that it is not Lord Rama but the Architect Nala andNeela who build the bridge? 3. The bridge was (Ramayan mentions the bridgecons truc ted in 5 days: 14 + 20 + 21 + 22 + 23 = 100 yojans)


100 Yojans long and 10 Yojans wide. Data to be cons ideredhere: 4 . The data s tarts from 14 yojans as firs t day, which is lessthan other day’s data, confirming a logic that firs t day as abeginning had taken time to gear up all V anars . Second day ittook momentum and res t of the days the dis tance of the bridgecons truc ted is found to be nearly same. A logical conc lus ion ofthis sort is made only when the event have occurred in reality. Why did Valmiki thrust his imagination to get the bridgecompleted only in 5 days? He could have well increased thenumber of days to help people of today understand it morelogically. Or he could have even reduced the number of days tohighlight the power of Lord Rama. 5. The data that more than a c rore (10 million) V anaraswere involved in building it, seems to be logical to fit to supportthe volume of the bridge cons truc ted. Now, the count may not beexac t, but surely V almiki wants to say that there was a hugetask force working for the bridge. Valmiki could have easily shown Lord Rama winning the battlewith few hundred Vanars as his soldiers - why 10 million? 6. The width vs . length ratio also looks sc ientific andsupportive to help carry such a huge mass ac ross the bridge.The bridge is wide enough so as to withs tand the weight ofc rores of V anaras and allow passage to all of them. 7 . The bridge is said to be built in 5 days , giving an idea thatbridge had to be built in a very short period of time, failing whichthe O pponent King Ravana would have come to know about itand would have attacked never allowing the bridge to becons truc ted. Thus , the period fits the war logic . 8 . The bridge is said to be cons truc ted by around a c roreV anaras , the count fits the poss ibility of getting the bridgecons truc ted in such a small time - a huge task force doing it.


Though, the methodology of cons truc tion is not elaborated andshortened by mentioning that various ‘Yantras ’ or Machinerywere used to build the bridge, but it gives an indication thatmachinery were applied to do the task. I t should be a subjec t tos tudy about our pas t. V almiki Ramayan: Yuddha Kanda, 22.60: ‘Has timatran Mahakayah P ashananshch Mahabalah P arvatanshch Samutpatya Yantraiyah P arivahanti C ha’

V anaras building bridge What was the need to mention that certain Machineries were used for constructingthe bridge? How did an ancient man imagine of machineries?9. Very interestingly, Rama is not said to have built the bridge and the point clarifiesthat building it was the skill of an architect - Nala and not Rama or Hanuman, the heroof the book. Had Ramayan been a fantasy of Maharishi Valmiki, he would easilyfantasized and written something like Rama built a bridge of Arrows as Rama was thehero in fantasy. But it is not so, making one think that it is not fantasy writing. Why didn’t he tell the world that it was Lord Rama who builds it and give the credit to


someone else of this great happening? After all, Lord Rama was the hero of hisimagination.10. Ramayan also depicts the materials used in making the bridge clarifying that it wasa possibility, but not under imagination of human capacity under technology supportof today. 11. Seeing the time constraint, it looks logical to have Vanars who are brisk in theirmovement collecting materials and fitting it in place as directed. 12. The places mentioned in Ramayan exactly matches to the current location of thebridge, thus confirming that the book is not a story. 13. The length of the bridge matches to what is mentioned in Ramayan. So, looking at Ramayan alone one can conclude that the Bridge is not a naturalconstruct. Having proven on the point of Bridge alone that Ramayan is not a book ofmyth, but a book of History, it straight away brings the truth that Maharishi Valmiki wasthe first Historian known to man kind 3. Current Findings on RAM SETHU and their analysis However, we need to further analyze current findings as well. 1. The first thing to consider is that under the current scientific evaluation, thebridge is proved to have a chain of shoals is 30 to 35 km long in Palk Street, and itsunique curvature confirms that it is man made, and is not a Geographical Construct atall. 2. Archeological findings have proven that first signs of human inhabitants in SriLanka date back to primitive age of about 1,750,000 years of the same era as Ramayan(‘Treta Yug’, which lies exactly mid way to above number). 3. Sri Lankan Government has done Archeological Survey and found some veryinteresting data: 1. A mountain covered completely with herbal plants of same type that is found inHimalayas. There is no other mountain in whole Sri Lanka of that kind. This stands as anevidence that the mountain was brought by Lord Hanuman to Sri Lanka - How was thisdone is subject to study? To my knowledge, Sri Yantra of Hindu myth (or may be similarconstructs) is actually a anti-gravitation theory which was know to our Rishis in thosedays and these things were possible only by such means. Someday, science will surelyunderstand this. 2. Ashok Vatika is traced with complete Greenery and while soil. With a gap ofhardly 10-20 meters, soil suddenly turns to be black and burnt and it stretches to miles.


This highly unnatural and it stands to prove that Lord Hanuman had burnt Lanka.

A ssumed ashok vatika of s ri lanka There are many other proofs that have come up, but I consider these two points asstrong as the Bridge itself. Can our Historians consult the British again and create more theory around theseevidences, so that they can be included in History books against Ramayan? 1. From Ayodhya to Sri Lanka, most of the places still hold the names as it wasaround a million years ago. Even the devastating Muslim invasion could not eliminatethe names. Ayodhya, Chitrakut, Panchvati, Rameswaram, Lanka - all the names are asmentioned in the book. Rameswaram is the place where Lord Rama worshipped LordShiva and established the idol ‘Shiv Lingam’, exist to date as a place of worship. Ramayantalks about Mahendragiri Mountain as the highest point and best point to watch acrossthe sea. Geographically, it is proven that Mahendragiri is the highest mountain in thatarea and gives a visibility of around 60 km range.


Lord Rama worshipping shiv lingam Why don’t these politicians and historians say how are these mentioned in Ramayan?Did these places pre-existed and Valmiki traveled a lot to create this story? Or theseplaces were named after people read Valmiki Ramayan? The more logical answer is, these places pre-existed and the event took place whichValimiki wrote as poetic history. 1. Another important fictitious topic of Ramayan is ‘Pushpak Viman’ - a vehicle thatcould take aerial route to travel. No doubt the Pusphak Viman no more exists, but itcannot be fantasy as we have similar air planes telling about it. What challenges theconcept of Viman is the understanding that technology has developed in current eraand people were devoid of such high-tech products in ancient India. But then Ramayangives a background of Pushpak Viman in terms of how it was acquired, thereby making


one think that it was not a mere fantasy. It should not be expected from the bookRamayan to describe the details of Pushpak Viman creation. The question that shouldbe asked is where the actual scientific data of Hindu researches about building thePushpak Viman got lost - and true history of India and world will evolve.


Lord rama came to ayodhya on Ravana pushpak vimana Do our Historians want to say that if Pushpak Viman existed then Valmiki would havementioned how it was built? How many history book of today contains the scientificmethodology of building machinery - why don’t our historians first do this? 1. What seems to be mythical to the Historians and Science is the concept ofMonkey building the Bridge. But they forget to expand the vision on this, purelybecause of their biased attitude to defeating Hindu faith. We all know now that there aremany species that do not exist now and the largest known to human is Dinosaur. Whycan’t different specie exist around 1 million years ago with the capacity of humanintelligence and monkey like physical structure - something that was called as Vanars inthose days? Science do not forget to mention that man evolved out of monkeys - butdefeats Hindus to consider that Vanars were the in between form of the evolution theevidence present in those days. But no view would consider this, simply because then


the religion of peace would win then. Yet, there is no doubt that evolution theory isagain a controversial theory existing and taught to people, without any scientificevidence around it. 2. No historian can deny the fact that there is a coincidence and only onecoincidence between a reality and its occurrence in a book called Ramayan. Instead, ofnow having set a direction to find out how such thing took place, these catholicfollowers are simply applying all forces and theories to falsify a fact. Science is now saying that the age of earth is around 4 billion years - can scienceproduce a history of 4 billion years with concrete proof - no one asks this questionand believes science. No one knows how many generation of humanity evolved and gotdestroyed since the earth was formed. No one knows when the earth was exactlyformed. Actual fictions and stories lie on this side as well - but our dear Historians donot have the courage to flatter about it. I do not understand, if such an amazing construct is not within the reach of modernscience, why can’t this bridge be put as one of the Wonders? Why can’t it be listedunder World Heritages (yet maintain it as Hindu sacred place)? Instead, the anti-Hindumoves are motivating Congress to destroy the bridge. If the destruction of a 500 year old Babri Masjid is not tolerable and it created havocin the world, why is million year old constructs not protected? Thousands of Hindutemples have been destroyed and are being destroyed to date in Kashmir, Pakistan,Bangladesh, Malaysia, and so many other countries. Neither media nor politics talksabout it. Why shouldn’t Hindus stand now to protect Ram Sethu, which is a directproof of One million old history of India?By Chanchal Malviya<http://www.articlesbase.com/authors/chanchal-malviya/27034> <http://www.artic lesbase.com/religion-artic les /ram-sethu-proof-of-great-sc ience-of-anc ient-pas t-499823.html>


http://www.articlesbase.com/authors/chanchal-malviya/27034

http://www.articlesbase.com/religion-articles/ram-sethu-proof-of-great-science-of-ancient-past-499823.html

this article is downloaded from indian...

Documents