third supplement the londo - ibiblio.org · of tuesday, the zgth of july, 1947 by finfyotity...

20
(ftumb. 38031 3591 THIRD SUPPLEMENT TO The London Of TUESDAY, the zgth of JULY, 1947 by finfyotity Registered as a newspaper THURSDAY, 31 JULY, 1947 BATTLE OF MATAPAN. The following Despatch was submitted to the Lords Commissioners of the Admiralty on the nth November, 1941, by Admiral Sir Andrew B. Cunningham, G.C.B., D.S.O., Commander-in-Chief, Mediterranean Station. Mediterranean, ntffe November,. 1941. Be pleased to lay before Their Lordships the attached reports of the Battle of Matapan, 27th- 30th March, 1941. Five ships of the enemy fleet were sunk, burned or destroyed as per margin.* Except for the loss of one aircraft in action, our fleet suffered no damage or casualties. 2. The events and information prior to the action, on which my appreciation was based, are already known to Their Lordships. Long and' anxious consideration had been given to the disposition of available forces, important factors being the necessity to maintain the flow of " Lustre "f convoys to Greece, and the difficulty of finding sufficient destroyers for a- fleet operation when demands for convoy escorts were- so heavy. The disablement of H.M.S. YORK at Suda Bay at the outset of these deliberations was a serious .blow. 3. The disposition described in paragraph 7 of 'the Commander-in^Ghiefs narrative was adopted with the intention of countering a possible cruiser raid into the Aegean. It was designed to give flexibility and allowed for a quick change of plan if more intelligence came to hand to clarify the situation. I was concerned to avoid any movement which might alarm the enemy and cause him to defer any operation he might have in mind. To allow a state of suspense to continue, with Operation " Lustre " in full swing, would have imposed an increased strain on the light forces of the fleet. Note:—UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED REFERENCES ARE TO PARAGRAPHS IN THE COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF, MEDITER- RANEAN STATION'S NARRATIVE. * 10,000 ton cruisers:—ZARA, POLA, FIUME. 1,500 ton destroyers, two, probably.—GIOBERTI, MAESTRALE. t Admiralty footnote:—Operation " Lustre " was the transport of British troops and supplies to Greece. 4. The disposition originally ordered left the cruisers without support. The battlefleet could if necessary have put to sea, but very inadequately screened. Further consideration led to the retention of sufficient destroyers to screen the battlefieet. The moment was a lucky one when more destroyers than usual were at Alexandria having just returned from or just awaiting escort duty. 5. It had already been decided to take the battlefleet to sea under cover of night on the evening of the 27th, when air reconnaissance from Malta reported enemy cruisers steaming eastward p.m./27th. The battlefleet accordingly proceeded with all possible secrecy. It was well that it did so, for the forenoon of the 28th found the enemy south of Gavdo and the Vice- Admiral, Light Forces (Vice-Admiral H. D. Pridharn-Wippell), "with Force " B "* in an awkward situation which might have been serious had the support of the battlefleet been lacking. 6. The situation at 0812 (Diagram No. i), when surface contact was first made did not appear unsatisfactory although in fact at this time Force " B " was very uncomfortably placed with a second and powerful enemy cruiser squadron out of sight to the north-east and well placed to cut Force " B " off from the battlefleet. This squadron had actually been sighted and reported by H.M.S. GLOU- CESTER'S spotting aircraft (see paragraph 10 and Report of V.A.L.F., paragraph 11) but fortunately for everybody's peace of mind this report did not get beyond H.M.S. GLOUCESTER'S T.S.f (see diagrams i and 2). 7. Aircraft from H.M.S. FORMIDABLE had sighted and reported a further force to the northward of the cruisers and in one case had reported battleships, but the situation was not very clear. The aircraft were not at this time using duty letters which made for confusion: previous experience 'had taught us how often cruisers of the Italian Navy are reported as * Admiralty footnote:—Force " B " consisted of H.M. Ships ORION (Flag of V.A.L.F.), AJAX, PERTH and GLOUCESTER, the 2nd Destroyer Flotilla comprising ILEX (Captain D.i2), HASTY, HEREWARD and VENDETTA. t Admiralty footnote:—T.S. Transmitting Station.

Upload: others

Post on 02-Oct-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: THIRD SUPPLEMENT The Londo - ibiblio.org · Of TUESDAY, the zgth of JULY, 1947 by finfyotity Registered as a newspaper THURSDAY, 31 JULY, 1947 BATTLE OF MATAPAN. The following Despatch

(ftumb. 38031 3591

THIRD SUPPLEMENTTO

The LondonOf TUESDAY, the zgth of JULY, 1947

by finfyotityRegistered as a newspaper

THURSDAY, 31 JULY, 1947BATTLE OF MATAPAN.

The following Despatch was submitted to theLords Commissioners of the Admiralty on thenth November, 1941, by Admiral SirAndrew B. Cunningham, G.C.B., D.S.O.,Commander-in-Chief, Mediterranean Station.

Mediterranean,ntffe November,. 1941.

Be pleased to lay before Their Lordships theattached reports of the Battle of Matapan, 27th-30th March, 1941. Five ships of the enemyfleet were sunk, burned or destroyed as permargin.* Except for the loss of one aircraftin action, our fleet suffered no damage orcasualties.

2. The events and information prior to theaction, on which my appreciation was based,are already known to Their Lordships. Longand' anxious consideration had been given tothe disposition of available forces, importantfactors being the necessity to maintain the flowof " Lustre "f convoys to Greece, and thedifficulty of finding sufficient destroyers for a-fleet operation when demands for convoyescorts were- so heavy.

The disablement of H.M.S. YORK at SudaBay at the outset of these deliberations was aserious .blow.

3. The disposition described in paragraph 7of 'the Commander-in^Ghiefs narrative wasadopted with the intention of countering apossible cruiser raid into the Aegean. It wasdesigned to give flexibility and allowed for aquick change of plan if more intelligence cameto hand to clarify the situation.

I was concerned to avoid any movementwhich might alarm the enemy and cause himto defer any operation he might have in mind.To allow a state of suspense to continue, withOperation " Lustre " in full swing, would haveimposed an increased strain on the light forcesof the fleet.

Note:—UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED REFERENCES ARETO PARAGRAPHS IN THE COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF, MEDITER-RANEAN STATION'S NARRATIVE.

* 10,000 ton cruisers:—ZARA, POLA, FIUME.1,500 ton destroyers, two, probably.—GIOBERTI,MAESTRALE.

t Admiralty footnote:—Operation " Lustre " wasthe transport of British troops and supplies to Greece.

4. The disposition originally ordered left thecruisers without support. The battlefleet couldif necessary have put to sea, but veryinadequately screened. Further considerationled to the retention of sufficient destroyers toscreen the battlefieet. The moment was alucky one when more destroyers than usualwere at Alexandria having just returned fromor just awaiting escort duty.

5. It had already been decided to take thebattlefleet to sea under cover of night on theevening of the 27th, when air reconnaissancefrom Malta reported enemy cruisers steamingeastward p.m./27th. The battlefleet accordinglyproceeded with all possible secrecy. It waswell that it did so, for the forenoon of the 28thfound the enemy south of Gavdo and the Vice-Admiral, Light Forces (Vice-Admiral H. D.Pridharn-Wippell), "with Force " B "* in anawkward situation which might have beenserious had the support of the battlefleet beenlacking.

6. The situation at 0812 (Diagram No. i),when surface contact was first made did notappear unsatisfactory although in fact at thistime Force " B " was very uncomfortablyplaced with a second and powerful enemycruiser squadron out of sight to the north-eastand well placed to cut Force " B " off fromthe battlefleet. This squadron had actuallybeen sighted and reported by H.M.S. GLOU-CESTER'S spotting aircraft (see paragraph 10and Report of V.A.L.F., paragraph 11) butfortunately for everybody's peace of mind thisreport did not get beyond H.M.S.GLOUCESTER'S T.S.f (see diagrams i and 2).

7. Aircraft from H.M.S. FORMIDABLE hadsighted and reported a further force to thenorthward of the cruisers and in one case hadreported battleships, but the situation was notvery clear. The aircraft were not at this timeusing duty letters which made for confusion:previous experience 'had taught us how oftencruisers of the Italian Navy are reported as

* Admiralty footnote:—Force " B " consisted ofH.M. Ships ORION (Flag of V.A.L.F.), AJAX,PERTH and GLOUCESTER, the 2nd DestroyerFlotilla comprising ILEX (Captain D.i2), HASTY,HEREWARD and VENDETTA.

t Admiralty footnote:—T.S. Transmitting Station.

Page 2: THIRD SUPPLEMENT The Londo - ibiblio.org · Of TUESDAY, the zgth of JULY, 1947 by finfyotity Registered as a newspaper THURSDAY, 31 JULY, 1947 BATTLE OF MATAPAN. The following Despatch

3592 SUPPLEMENT TO THE LONDON GAZETTE, 31 JULY, 1947

battleships from the air. The situation did not,therefore, appear unduly alarming, but the airstriking force was made ready and H.M.S.VALIANT ordered ahead to join V.A.L.F.

8. The sighting by Force " B " of a battle-ship at 1058 (see diagram No. 3) put a verydifferent complexion on affairs. The enemy wasknown to be fast and H.M.S. GLOUCESTERhad been reported only capable of 24 knots.Force " B " looked like being sandwichedbetween the VITTORIO VENETO and the8 inch cruisers they had already engaged. Itwas with great relief that it was realised thatForce " B " was able to make 30 knots andthat the range was not closing.

V.A.L.F. -handled the squadron with greatskill, holding the range open and taking everyadvantage of his smoke screen as he workedround to south-east to close the battlefleet; butthere were some unpleasant minutes with 15inch salvos straddling the cruisers before theintervention of the Torpedo/Bomber strikingforce which gained a hit on sthe VITTORIOhad caused her to turn away (see paragraph 15and diagram No. 4).

9. It had always previously been myintention, if contact were made with theenemy's fleet, to ihold back the torpedo airstriking force until the battleneets had closedwithin about 50 miles of each other, or untilthe enemy had definitely turned away. On thisoccasion owing to the exposed position of thecruisers it was necessary to launch the strikingforce unduly early. Few things could havebeen mare timely than their intervention butit had the effect I had always feared, that thedamaged enemy turned for home with a leadwhich could not be closed to gun range indaylight.

10. Meanwhile the battlefleet was pressing onfast to close the enemy. V.A.L.F.'s signaltimed 1210 reporting he had lost touch actuallyreached me as Force " B " hove in sight at1230. It might be argued that Force " B "should have followed and maintained touchwhen the enemy turned westward, but with theconsiderable chance which then existed of beingcut off by superior force, and adequate airreconnaissance being available, it is consideredthat the Vice-Admiral, Light Forces, wascorrect in his decision to gain visual contactwith the battle fleet and check respectivepositions before resuming the chase. His forcehad been outranged and outgunned by allenemy vessels with which he had so far madecontact.

11. The attacks carried out by Royal AirForce Blenheim bombers from Greece weremost welcome as giving the enemy a taste ofhis own medicine, this being the first time thatour bombing aircraft had co-operated with thefleet at sea. In actual fact it is not thoughtthat any hits were scored, certainly no appreci-able damage was done, but the attacks musthave worried the enemy and made him evenmore chary of approaching our coasts. Thework of 230 Fighter/Bomber Squadron was,as ever, invaluable.

12. It cannot be said for certain how many,if any, further hits were obtained onVITTORIO by the successive Fleet Air Armattacks during the afternoon (diagram No. 5)and evening. All that is certain is that thePOLA was hit and stopped in a dusk attack,but, whatever the result, the gallantry andperseverance of the aircraft crews and the

smooth efficiency of deck and ground crewsin H.M.S. FORMIDABLE and at Maleme aredeserving of high praise.

An example of the spirit of these youngofficers is the case of Lieutenant F. M. A.Torrens Spence, Royal Navy, who, rather thanbe left out, flew with the only available aircraftand torpedo from Eleusis to Maleme and inspite of reconnaissance difficulties and badcommunications arranged his own reconnais-sance and finally took off with a second aircraftin company and took part in the dusk attack.

13. In spite of continual air sighting reportsthe situation towards the end of the afternoonhad become rather confused. This was due tothe presence of both ship iborne and shorebased reconnaissance aircraft, a considerablechange of wind, the presence of several separateenemy squadrons and finally the ever presentdifficulty of distinguishing the silhouettes ofenemy warships. It was difficult to decide thetactics for the night.

The situation was however rapidly clearedup by about 1800. V.A.L.F.'s cruisers werejust gaining touch ahead and two aircraft, DutyV of H.M.S. FORMIDABLE and Duty Q fromH.M.S. WARSPITE had made contact.Mention must here be made of the excellentwork of H.M.S. WARSPTTE'S catapult aircraft(Lieutenant-Commander A. S. Bolt, D.S.C.,Royal Navy, Observer). This aircraft had, bya fortunate mistake, returned to the shipinstead of going to Suda Bay as ordered. Itwas recovered, refuelled and catapulted asDuty Q at 1745. Within an hour and a halfthis experienced observer had presented mewith an accurate picture of the situation whichwas of the utmost value at this time (diagramNo. 6).

14. The last report, however, showed that adifficult problem was before us. The enemyhad concentrated in a mass which presented amost formidable obstacle to attack by cruisersand destroyers. By morning he would bedrawing under cover of dive bombing aircraftfrom Sicily. The question was whether to 'sendthe destroyers in now to attack this difficulttarget or wait until morning in the hope ofengaging at dawn, but with the certainty ofexposing the fleet to a heavy scale of air attack.Decision was taken to attack with destroyersand to follow up with the battlefleet.

15. Meanwhile the Vice-Admiral, LightForces, was also faced with difficult decisions.As dusk fell he was drawing up on the enemywith his cruisers spread, to maintain contact.In the last of the afterglow it appeared that anenemy squadron was turning back towards himwhich obliged him to concentrate his force.This was undoubtedly a right decision, but fromthen onward every time he wished to spreadhis cruisers to resume the search he was foiledby some circumstances, not least of which wasthe decision of Captain (D) I4th DestroyerFlotilla to lead the destroyer flotillas round thenorthern flank of the enemy before attacking.This decision of Captain 0.14 was most un-fortunate, as it cramped the cruiser squadronand left the southern flank of the enemy openfor escape (diagram No. 6). It is thought thatthe- enemy did in fact " jink " to the southabout this time and thus get away.

16. The battleship night action (diagram Nos.7 and 8) presented no novel aspect, apart fromthe employment of Radar and the outstandingsuccess of the indirect illumination provided by

Page 3: THIRD SUPPLEMENT The Londo - ibiblio.org · Of TUESDAY, the zgth of JULY, 1947 by finfyotity Registered as a newspaper THURSDAY, 31 JULY, 1947 BATTLE OF MATAPAN. The following Despatch

SUPPLEMENT TO THE LONDON GAZETTE, 31 JULY, 1947 3593

H.M.S. GREYHOUND, but a curious contrastof opinion has arisen over the actual targetsengaged. The technical records of the actionshow that H.M.S. WARSPITE engaged therear-most ship first and subsequently shiftedtarget left to the second ship in the enemy line(the leading ship is now thought to have beena destroyer).

*My own opinion supported by the Chief ofStaff, the Captain of the Fleet and several StaffOfficers, is that H.M.S. WARSPITE engagedthe leading 8 inch cruiser (2nd in the line) andsubsequently shifted fire right to the rear ship.It is a point which cannot be absolutely de-cided until the full story of this action fromboth sides is known, but it appears that theGunnery Records must -be wrong.

17. On conclusion of the battlefleet action,the signal was made " All forces not engagedin sinking the enemy, retire north-east ". Theorder was intended to ensure withdrawal onparallel tracks clear of the destroyer melee,and was made under the impression thatcruisers and striking force were in contact withthe enemy. Heavy fighting had been observedto the south westward which supported thisbelief. Unfortunately the cruisers were not infact engaged and the Vice-Admiral, LightForces, accordingly withdrew to the north-east.He had sighted a red pyrotechnic signal somedistance to the north-west 40 minutes earlierand was at this time about to spread to in-vestigate (see report of V.A.L.F., paragraph35). This red light signal was sighted simul-taneously by Captain 0.14 bearing oio degrees,who seeing it in the direction of the 7th CruiserSquadron and knowing from their fG.A.B.signal they had seen it, forebore to investigate.

There seems little doubt, from subsequentanalysis, that this, must have been the re-mainder of the Italian Fleet withdrawing tothe north-west (see diagram No. 9).

I am of the opinion that the course I selectedfor withdrawal led the fleet too far to the east-ward, and that a more northerly course shouldhave been steered.

18. I hoped when ordering the eightdestroyers of the striking force to attack thatthe cruisers would regain touch to assistCaptain D.I4 to launch his attack. The bearingand distance of the enemy given to the strikingforce when detached (286 degrees 35 miles fromH.M.S. WARSPITE) was based on the plotand was in fact approximately correct but theenemy's course appears to have been 45 degreesfurther to the north-westward than that esti-mated. In spite, therefore, of Captain D.i4'sintention to pass to the northward of the enemy,the striking force apparently passed under thestern of the enemy to his southern flank whilstthe cruisers were steering on an approximatelyparallel course on the enemy's northern flank(see diagram No. 7). The red pyrotechnic wasshown between these two British forces.

19. The mistake made by H.M.S. HAVOCK(paragraph 38) in reporting the POLA as aLITTORIO class did not actually bring aboutany ill effect, since the flotillas had by thenmissed the VITTORIO and did useful work inpolishing off the damaged cruisers (diagramNo. 10). The movements and the results

*Admiralty footnote:—Subsequent analysis tends toshow that WARSPITE first engaged FIUME, thesecond cruiser, and that she then shifted target andwith VALIANT fired at ZARA the leading cruiser.

t Admiralty footnote:—G.A.B. signifies GeneralAlarm Bearing".

achieved by H.M.'A.S. STUART's divisionduring the'night remain most obscure. H.M.S.HAVOCK certainly sank an enemy destroyer.

They had an exciting night and did consider-able execution, but the presence of undamagedenemy cruisers in the area at that time seems un-likely and it is not improbable that the ships soreported by H.M.A.S. STUART were in factsome of the others of 'his own division.

20. It seems that the enemy must have beenable to increase speed again during the night,since although extensive reconnaissance wasflown next morning, he remained unsighted andmust by then have been nearing the Italiancoast. The search for survivors was interruptedby the appearance of German aircraft and itwas decided to withdraw the fleet before theexpected heavy air attacks developed, as nomore useful work appeared to remain to 'be.done.

The fleet was in fact subjected to a fairlysevere dive bombing attack by Ju 88s at 1530,.when H.M.S. FORMIDABLE was narrowlymissed by several bombs.

21. The mistake which prevented the Greek:destroyer flotilla taking part in the action was?perhaps not unfortunate (see paragraph 39 J.These destroyers had been sent through theCorinth Canal to Argostoli with admirablepromptitude to a position where they were wellplaced to intercept the retreating enemy fleet,a task which they would certainly have under-taken with characteristic gallantry. Neverthe-less the presence of yet another detached forcein the area, and that force one with which Icould not readily communicate, would haveseriously added to the complexity of the situa-tion. It was, however, disappointing for theGreeks.

22. The results of the action cannot be viewedwith entire satisfaction, since the damagedVITTORIO VENETO was allowed to escape.The failure of the cruisers and destroyers tomake contact with her during the night wasunlucky and is much to be regretted. Never-theless substantial results were achieved in thedestruction of the three ZARA Class cruisers.These fast well armed and armoured ships hadalways been a source of anxiety as a threat toour own less well armed cruisers and I waswell content to see them disposed of in thissummary fashion. There is little doubt thatthe rough handling given the enemy on thisoccasion served us in good stead during thesubsequent evacuations of Greece and Crete.Much of these later operations may be saidto have been conducted under the cover ofthe Battle of Matapan.

(Signed) A. B. CUNNINGHAM,AdmiraL

NARRATIVE OF THE COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF,MEDITERRANEAN.

Preliminary Intelligence.From the 25th March onwards various in-

dications were noticed of increasing activity onthe part of German and Italian forces. Featuresof the activity noticed were an increasinglyactive sea reconnaissance by aircraft to thesouth and west of Greece and Crete and dailyattempts to reconnoitre Alexandria harbour.

2. These activities together with the obviousimminence of the German attack on Greece andYugo Slavia led to 'belief that some importantstep by the enemy was impending. The un-usual keenness with which the enemy was

Page 4: THIRD SUPPLEMENT The Londo - ibiblio.org · Of TUESDAY, the zgth of JULY, 1947 by finfyotity Registered as a newspaper THURSDAY, 31 JULY, 1947 BATTLE OF MATAPAN. The following Despatch

3594 SUPPLEMENT TO THE LONDON GAZETTE, 31 JULY, 1947

watching the movements of the MediterraneanFleet made it appear possible that an operationby enemy surface forces was intended.

The most probable actions by enemy surfaceforces appeared to be: —

(a) An attack on our convoy routes in theAegean.

(b) The escorting of a convoy to theDodecanese.

(c) A diversion to cover a landing eitherin Cyrenaica or in Greece.

(d) The possibility of an attack on Malta•could not be excluded.3. The Commander-in-Chief was therefore

faced with the problem of meeting a threatwhich he 'knew to exist, but whose nature herould not foretell. Our most vulnerable pointat this time lay undoubtedly in the convoyscarrying troops and material to Greece. Theywere moving, at the time, comparatively 'lightlyescorted, under the rather inadequate cover ofthe Seventh Cruiser Squadron in the Aegean.

It was important to avoid interruption in thepassage of these convoys if possible.

4. The obvious course to prevent enemysurface action against the convoys would havebeen to move the battlefleet into the area westof Crete. It was, however, almost certain that,had this been done, the fleet would have beensighted on its way, in which case the enemywould have only deferred his operation untilthe fleet was obliged to return to harbour tofuel.

5. After consideration it appeared most un-desirable to defer this unknown threat whichwas impending. It was accordingly decidedthat the best course would be to clear thethreatened area of convoys and merchantshipping so that the enemy's blow would bestruck in a vacuum, at the same time makingsuch disposition of available forces as wouldenable us to engage enemy surface forces shouldthey appear.

6. At the same time it was important tomaintain an appearance of normality in thearea concerned, lest the enemy should " smella rat ". It was lucky that only one convoywas actually at sea, A.G.g bound for Piraeuswith troops, which was then south of Crete.This convoy was ordered to maintain its courseuntil nightfall 27th and then turn back in itstracks. A southbound convoy from Piraeuswas ordered not to sail.

In the meantime authorities in the Aegeanwere warned at the last possible moment toclear the area of shipping.Dispositions.

7. The following dispositions were thenordered:—

(a) Force B, consisting of Vice-Admiral,Light Forces, with four cruisers and fourdestroyers to be south-west of Gavdo Islandat daylight 28th March.

(b) Force C, consisting of five destroyersto join him at that time.

(c) *T.S.R. Squadrons in Crete andCyrenaica to be reinforced.

(d) Royal Air Force requested to exertmaximum effort of reconnaissance andbomber aircraft in Aegean and to west ofCrete on 28th March.

(e) H.M. Submarines ROVER andTRIUMPH ordered to patrol off Suda Bayand Milo respectively.* Admiralty footnote:—T.S.R.—Torpedo/Spotter/

Keconnaissance.

(/) Force D, consisting of H.M. ShipsJUNO, JAGUAR, and DEFENDER, whowere at Piraeus, to be at short notice.

(g) H.M.S. CARLISLE ordered to SudaBay to augment A.A. defences.

(h) Greek Naval forces warned to be atshort notice.

Air Reconnaissance Report.8. This plan was adhered'.to in the main but

at noon/27th three enemy cruisers and one-destroyer were sighted by air reconnaissancein position 36 degs. 30 mins. N., 16 degs.40 mins. E., steering 120 degs. This positionwas later amended to 36 degs. 54 mins. N.,17 degs. 10 mins. E. Visibility was bad andthe flying boat could not shadow. The Com-mander-in-Chief decided to take the battlefleetto sea, cancelled the move to Cyrenaka of theT.S.R. aircraft, and made the following re-dispositions : —

Force "B," consisting of the Vice-Admiral,Light Forces in ORION, AJAX, PERTH,GLOUCESTER, the Captain (D), SecondDestroyer Flotilla in ILEX, HASTY,HEREWARD and VENDETTA (all fromoperations in the Aegean) were to rendezvousand be in position 34 degs. 20 mins. N.,24 degs. 10 mins. E., at 0630/28th.GLOUCESTER'S speed was reported downto 24 knots due to .trouble with a plummerblock.

Force " C " was to remain with thebattlefleet.

Royal Air Force reconnaissance wasarranged for 28th over the southern IonianSea, the south-west Aegean, and south ofCrete.

Fleet Sailing from Alexandria.9. Enemy reconnaissance 'planes were over

the fleet at Alexandria at noon and again p.m.27th. At dusk, iQOO/27th, the Commander-in-Chief sailed the Fleet from Alexandria.WARSPITE, BARHAM, VALIANT andFORMIDABLE were in company, the Rear-Admiral, First Battle Squadron, being in

•BARHAM, and the Rear-Admiral, Mediterra-nean Aircraft Carriers, in FORMIDABLE.The fleet was screened by Captain (D),Fourteenth Destroyer Flotilla in JERVIS,JANUS, NUBIAN, MOHAWK, the Captain(D), Tenth Destroyer Flotilla in STUART,GREYHOUND, GRIFFIN, HOTSPUR andHAVOCK. Course was set 300 degs. at 20knots.z8th March, 1941—First Sight and, Contact

with the Enemy—Forenoon Action.10. A dawn air search was flown off from

FORMIDABLE and at 0739 an aircraftreported four cruisers and six destroyers (tobe known as Force " X ") about 30 milessouth of Gavdo Island steering 160 degs. Thiswas at first thought to be an inaccurate reportof Force " B " which was known to be in thatarea, but at 0827 the Vice-Admiral, LightForces' first sighting report of three cruisersand destroyers was received. The Commander-in-Chief increased speed to 22 knots, maintain-ing course 300 degs. The Vice-Admiral, LightForces, was estimated to bear 267 degs. 90miles from the battlefleet and the enemy werereported 009 degs. 18 miles from him steeringfirst 100 degs. and then 160 degs. At 0900 theenemy were reported turning back to 300 degs.with the Vice-Admiral, Light Forces, alsoturning to the north-westward. The Com-mander-in-Chief detached VALIANT to proceed

Page 5: THIRD SUPPLEMENT The Londo - ibiblio.org · Of TUESDAY, the zgth of JULY, 1947 by finfyotity Registered as a newspaper THURSDAY, 31 JULY, 1947 BATTLE OF MATAPAN. The following Despatch

SUPPLEMENT TO THE LONDON GAZETTE, 31 JULY, 1947 35Q5

ahead at maximum speed with NUBIAN andMOHAWK; WARSPITE (who was havingslight condenser trouble) and BARHAMremained in company with FORMIDABLE.

11. FORMIDABLE'S aircraft were not using"Duty Letters" so that it was difficult tofollow the series of reports. Their positionswere also being omitted from reports as in thecase of aircraft 5H report timed 0905. Anenemy force was being reported to the north-ward of the cruisers, but it was not clear to theCommander-in-Chief whether this was in factanother force or either of those already incontact. The term " battleships " was usedon one occasion. On balance it seemed probablethat there was another enemy force containingbattleships, on which the cruisers were retiring;the Commander-in-Chief, therefore, decided tokeep the air striking force back until the doubtabout this had been cleared up. The aircraft,however, lost touch with the enemy and at0939 the Commander-in-Chief ordered the airstriking force to attack the cruisers in contactwith the Vice-Admiral, Light Forces; if anothersquadron was sighted first, it was to be attackedinstead.

12. At this time Force " X " was estimatedto be 75 miles 300 degs. from the Commander-in-Chief, being reported 16 miles 320 degs. fromthe Vice-Admiral, Light Forces. In order toincrease the speed of the fleet, BARHAM wasordered to follow in the wake of the screen in-dependently of flying operations. VENDETTAwas sighted ahead having been detached bythe Vice-Admiral, Light Forces to join thebattlefleet on account of engine trouble. TheCommander-in-Chief ordered her to proceedindependently to Alexandria.

13. By 1030 there was still no further newsof the enemy to the northward and it seemedpos'sible that Force " X " in contact with theVice-Admiral, Light Forces, was after all theonly enemy squadron in the vicinity; but at1058 the Vice-Admiral, Light Forces reportedtwo battleships bearing 002 degs. 16 miles fromhim and steering 160 degs. The Vice-AdmiralLight Forces turned away to the south-eastwardmaking smoke, but was evidently placed in amost uncomfortable position with the cruiserson his starboard quarter and the battleships (tobe known as Force " Y ") to port. The Com-mander-in-Chief ordered FORMIDABLE to putthe air striking force on to the battleships anddecided to close the Vice-Admiral, Light Forces 'as quickly as possible rather than work roundbetween the battleships and their base. Thedoubt as to whether GLOUCESTER would beable to maintain the Vice-Admiral, LightForces' reported speed of 30 knots weighed infavour of this decision, but the Vice-Admiral,Light Forces' 1123 showed that he was stillkeeping the battleships at a range of 16 miles.

14. The Vice-Admiral, Light Forces was esti-mated to bear 280 degs. 65 miles from the Com-mander-in-Chief at 1135 steering 120 degs. butthere was some doubt as to the accuracy of thisowing to possible difference in reference posi-tions. In order, therefore, to be certain ofmaking contact with the Vice-Admiral, LightForces as early as possible, the Commander-in-Chief altered course to 290 degs. at 1135 andto 270 degs. at 1200. FORMIDABLE wasdetached with two destroyers to operate aircraftindependently, VALIANT was still in companyand BARHAM had been keeping up well.

Surface contact lost—First air attack.15. At 1200 Force " Y ", which was now

reported to consist of only one LITTORIO classbattleship with destroyers, was estimated tobear 290 degs. 45 miles from the Commander-in-Chief; the destroyer screen was detachedahead to join the Captains (D), but at 1210 theVice-Admiral, Light Forces reported having losttouch with the enemy battlefleet and fiveminutes later the air striking force returned with,the news that the battleship had last been seenat 1145, steering 270 degs. with cruisers 20miles to the south-east. The striking'force re-ported one probable hit on the battleship. AJU. 88 had been shot down by a Fulmar.Second heavy Enemy Force reported.

16. A new force (to be known as Force" Z ") was now sighted to the northward byFlying Boat Duty V. It was reported to con-sist of two CAVOUR class battleships, onePOLA and two ZARA cruisers and fivedestroyers in position 35 miles west of Gavdo>Island steering 315 degs. 25 knots.Contact made with the Vice-Admiral, Light

Forces.17. At 1230 the Vice-Admiral, Light Forces

was sighted bearing 220 degs. 12 miles with allhis force undamaged. The Commander-in-Chief altered course to 290 degs. and orderedthe second air striking force to attack the LIT-TORIO battleship. The Vice-Admiral, LightForces' signal timed 1245 was the first intima-tion to the Commander-in-Chief that the enemyhad turned northward, but this was laterassumed to be a signal error and the enemyto have turned westward as reported by thestriking force.

By 1250 it was evident that Forces " X "and " Y " had turned back and there was noprospect of overtaking them unless the speedof the LITTORIO was reduced by air attack.The destroyers were, therefore, ordered to re-form a battlefleet screen, the Captain (D),Second Destroyer Flotilla and two destroyersbeing sent to' the assistance of FORMIDABLEwho was now a long way astern and seen tobe engaging two Torpedo-Bomber aircraft.Speed was reduced at 1306 to 22 knots and at1325 to 21 knots to allow FORMIDABLE andBARHAM to keep up. Force B was now inposition 230 degs. 6 miles from the battlefleet.The Chase.

18. At 1350 course was altered to 310 degs.as it was thought probable that Forces " Y' "and " Z" were trying to make contact witheach other. An air search was also ordered tothe north-westward since no further reports hadbeen received of Forces " X " and " Y ".Doubts whether Duty " V " might in reality bereporting Force " Y " were cleared up whenhis position was checked by a landfall and at1342 the Commander-in-Chief signalled thepositions of the three forces to the fleet. 201Group were instructed to concentrate all flyingboats in the area south and west of Crete tomaintain touch with the enemy. JUNO andForce D were ordered to patrol the KitheraStraits.

19. During the forenoon a strong breeze fromthe north-east had made fly-ing operations delaythe fleet, but in the afternoon the wind droppedaltogether and the heavy cloud dispersed. Thischange in the wind probably also affected theaccuracy of the reported positions of the shorebased aircraft.

Page 6: THIRD SUPPLEMENT The Londo - ibiblio.org · Of TUESDAY, the zgth of JULY, 1947 by finfyotity Registered as a newspaper THURSDAY, 31 JULY, 1947 BATTLE OF MATAPAN. The following Despatch

3596 SUPPLEMENT TO THE LONDON GAZETTE, 31 JULY, 1947

20. Force " Y " was sighted again at 1515when FORMIDABLE's aircraft 4 N N re-ported one battleship and four destroyerssteering 270 degs. in a position 290 degs.65 miles from the Commander-in-Chief. Thesecond air striking force which had been in theair since 1235 attacked the battleship withtorpedoes; they reported three hits and that herspeed was reduced to 8 knots. The Commander-in-Chief altered course to 300 degs.

21. Shortly afterwards aircraft 4 N N re-ported Force " X " consisting of three cruisersand four destroyers stationed 25 miles 250degs. from the LITTORIO battleship whichwas steering 280 degs. about 10 knots. Duty" V " also reported three 6 inch cruisers andtwo destroyers bearing 155 degs. from Force" Z " both steering 300 degs. at 30 knots.

22. At this time (Maleme Fleet Air Arm re-ported that three Swordfish had attacked the

'cruisers of Force " X " with torpedoes at 1205scoring one possible hit and that anotherstriking force was being despatched. YORKwas instructed to arrange with Maleme for adusk attack to be carried out in conjunctionwith the flying boat reports.

23. At 1600 the two CAVOUR battleships-with Force " Z " were estimated to bear 305•degs. 120 miles from the Commander-in-Chiefstill steering north-westward at 30 knots. Thedamaged LITTORIO with Force " X " wasestimated at 60 miles 289 degs. from theCommander-in-Chief; it soon became apparentthat she must be making good 12 to 15 knotsand would not be overhauled by the battlefleetbefore dark. So at 1644 the Vice-Admiral,Light Forces, was ordered to press on and gaincontact. NUBIAN and MOHAWK were alsosent ahead to form a *V/S link with the Vice-Admiral, Light Forces. Soon afterwards athird air striking force was flown off to attackthe LITTORIO at dusk.Night Intentions.

24. Duty " V's " admirable reports of Force"" Z " still showed it to be in two groups, eachmaking 30 knots, the battleships steering 310degs. and the cruisers about 60 miles to thesouth-east of them, steering 325. It was alwayspossible, however, that this second force ofcruisers was in reality Force " X " which at1727 was seen to turn back and take stationfive miles south of the LITTORIO. The situa-tion was still, therefore, somewhat confusedwhen at 1810 the Commander-in-Chief signalledhis night intentions; if the cruisers gained touchwith the damaged battleship the destroyers•would be sent in to attack, followed if necessaryJby the battlefleet; if the cruisers failed to makecontact then the Commander-in-Chief intendedto work round to the north and west and regain;touch in the morning.Situation at dusk.

25. At 1745 WARSPITE's aircraft wascatapulted for the second time and at 1831 madethe first of a series of reports which rapidlycleared up the position. By 1915 it was clearthat the damaged battleship was about 45 milesfrom the Commander-in-Chief, steering 290degs. at 15 knots. Another cruiser force hadjoined it from the north-westward and theenemy fleet was now in five columns. TheLITTORIO was in the centre with fourdestroyers screening ahead and two astern; toport of her there were three 6-inch cruisers in

* Admiralty footnote:—V/S signifies Visual Signal.

the inner column and three NAVIGATORIclass destroyers in the outer column, to star-board there were three 8-inch cruisers in theinner column and two> 6-inch cruisers (laterfound to have been large destroyers) in theouter column. In addition Force " Z " wasstill to the north-westward and apparently con-sisted of two CAVOURs, the three ZARAsand five destroyers. The second force reportedby Duty " V " of two SAVOIAs, one DIAZand two destroyers, was probably that whichhad just joined the LITTORJO.

26. At 1925 the Vice-Admiral, Light Forces,reported two unknown ships and concentratedhis cruisers. Almost immediately afterwardshe reported enemy ships 9 miles to the north-west of him engaging aircraft and makingsmoke. Duty 4 N N reported that the enemy'scentre bore 310 degs. 14 miles from fourdestroyers in the van (probably the Vice-Admiral, Light Forces' four cruisers). At thesame time WARSPITE's aircraft reported theenemy altering course to 230 degs. 15 knots,but no indication was given that this was acompass turn of the whole fleet.Decision to engage at night.

27. At 1935 the air striking force reported" probable hits " but no definite informationof damage, and the Commander-in-Chief con-sidered whether he would be justified in takingthe fleet at night through a screening force ofat least six cruisers and u destroyers, withanother force of two battleships, three cruisersand five destroyers, in the vicinity. On theother hand if the enemy were able to continueat 14 or 15 knots during the night they wouldbe well under cover of the JU.87 dive bombersat daylight being already only 320 miles fromtheir base; if they were intercepted at dawn,our forces would almost certainly be subjectedto a very heavy scale of air attack throughoutthe day. The Commander-in-Chief decided toaccept a night action and at 2040 ordered thedestroyers to attack.

28. The attacking force was formed of eightdestroyers under Captain (D), FourteenthDestroyer Flotilla, organised into two divisions(the second under the Captain (D), SecondDestroyer Flotilla), while the remaining fourdestroyers under Captain (D), Tenth DestroyerFlotilla formed the battlefleet screen. Theenemy fleet was estimated to bear 286 degs.33 miles from the Commander-in-Chief, steering295 degs. at 13 knots. Captain (D), FourteenthDestroyer Flotilla decided to pass to the north-ward of the enemy and attack from the vanand signalled his intentions at 2115.

29. At 2iii a Radar report was received fromthe Vice-Admiral, Light Forces, of an unknownship stopped about five miles to port of him;the Commander-in-Chief at once altered courseto 280 degs. to pass nearer to the position. TheVice-Admiral, Light Forces, continued to thenorth-westward without investigating this reportand at 2215 reported that he was steering 340degs. with his cruisers concentrated and wouldkeep clear to the northward of the destroyers.The Vice-Admiral, Light Forces, did not againmake contact with the enemy and no furtherreports were received from him.Night action.

30. At 2210 what was apparently the sameship was detected by VALIANT'S Radar sixmiles on the port bow. The Commander-in-Chief decided to investigate and at 2213 thebattlefieet altered course together to 240 degs.,

Page 7: THIRD SUPPLEMENT The Londo - ibiblio.org · Of TUESDAY, the zgth of JULY, 1947 by finfyotity Registered as a newspaper THURSDAY, 31 JULY, 1947 BATTLE OF MATAPAN. The following Despatch

SUPPLEMENT TO THE LONDON GAZETTE, 31 JULY, 1947

the destroyer screen being ordered over to thestarboard side.

31. At 2225 two large cruisers wereunexpectedly sighted on the starboard bow,with a smaller vessel, thought at first to be a6-inch cruiser, ahead of them. The battlefleetwere turned back to 280 degs. into line ahead,and at 2228 when .the enemy were on the portbow at a range of about 4,000 yards, GREY-HOUND illuminated one of the enemy cruiserswith her searchlight, and WARSPITE openedfire. FORMIDABLE hauled out of the line tostarboard and .the battlefleet engaged. Theenemy were seen to be two cruisers of theZARA Class on an opposite course; they wereapparently completely taken by surprise andtheir turrets were -fore and aft. WARSPITE'Sfirst 15-inch broadside hit the rear cruiser withdevastating effect, five out of six shells hitting.Both cruisers were thereafter repeatedly hit,set severely on fire and put out of action. Adestroyer was seen passing behind the burningcruisers; this was probably the smaller vesseloriginally sighted ahead of them.

32. Except for flashing signals seen on theport quarter, nothing further was seen of theoriginal damaged ship which the battlefleet hadbeen closing to investigate. (BARHAM wasunable to carry out searchlight sweeping pro-cedure on the port quarter owing to damageto her searchlights by blast.)

33. At 2230 three enemy destroyers weresighted on the port bow closing from a positionastern of their cruisers and were engaged. At2232 they were seen to turn away makingsmoke and one at least fired torpedoes.

The battlefleet was turned 90 degs. tostarboard together by Fixed Light ManoeuvringSignal to avoid torpedoes and at 2233steadied on course oio degs. At this timeFORMIDABLE was acting independently onthe starboard bow.

34. During the engagement with enemydestroyers, the leading destroyers had been hitby 6-inch fire -from WARSPITE, and someconfusion was., caused by HAVOCK beingclosely engaged with the enemy destroyers andfailing to burn fighting lights. As a resultWARSPITE fired two salvos at her. HAVOCKwas not damaged although it was thought atthe time that she had possibly been hit.

35. The battlefleet ceased fire at 2235 andwas re-formed into line ahead on a courseoio degs.; FORMIDABLE was ordered torejoin the line at 2310. The four screeningdestroyers (STUART, HAVOCK, GREY-HOUND and GRIFFIN) were released at 2238and ordered to finish off the two cruisers seento be on fire and then bearing 150 degs. fourmiles.

36. At 2245, when the burning cruisers werestill seen right astern (190 degs.), starshell andheavy firing with tracer ammunition could beseen bearing 230 degs., and this continued for10 minu-tes or a quarter of an hour. Since noneof our ships were on that bearing it was thoughtpossible that the Italians were engaging theirown forces. Firing was seen to continue in thevicinity of the damaged cruisers for some timeand at 2300 a heavy explosion was seen andthought to be the torpedoing of one of them.Withdrawal—Light Forces Engagement.

37. The Commander-in-Chief then decidedto withdraw to the north-eastward in order toavoid the possibility of our own forces engaging

3597

each other and to return to the battle area inthe morning. He, therefore, ordered all forcesnot engaged in sinking the enemy to withdrawto the north-eastward, and at 2330 alteredcourse to 070 degs., speed 18 knots. TheCaptain (D), Fourteenth Destroyer Flotilla, wastold not to withdraw until after the strikingforce had attacked. Firing and occasionalheavy flashes were still seen intermittently untilabout oioo on a bearing of 190 degs. to 200degs.

38. At 0020 HAVOCK reported contact witha LITTORIO battleship in the position of thedamaged cruisers. The Captain (D), Four-teenth Destroyer Flotilla, with the striking forcereported that he was joining HAVOCK, as didGREYHOUND and GRIFFIN, but at onoHAVOCK altered the report to that of an8-inoh cruiser. At 0036, the Captain (D), TenthDestroyer Flotilla, had reported leaving threecruisers stopped and on fire and two othercruisers in the vicinity as well as two damageddestroyers. At 0314 HAVOCK reported beingalongside POLA and asked whether " to boardor blow her stern off with depth charges," theCaptain (D), Fourteenth Destroyer Flotillathen reported having sunk ZARA and beingabout to sink POLA.

March, 1941.39. At 0006 the iCommander-in-Chief had

ordered the fleet to rendezvous at 0700 inposition 35 degs. 54 mins. N., 21 degs. 38 mins.E., and requested air reconnaissance thefollowing morning. JCINO, JAGUAR andDEFENDER were ordered to join the Com-mander-in-Ohief, and also BONAVENTURE,who had left Alexandria the previous afternoon.A Greek flotilla of seven destroyers had beensent through the Corinth Canal to await orderson the first reports of the engagement, butowing to a cyphering error they were notordered to join the Commander-in-Chief until0350. The Naval Attache, Athens, reportedthat 23 Blenheims had attacked the northernforce of enemy ships between 1445 and 1655728th Mardi and had stopped one cruiser withtwo direct hits and a destroyer with one directhit. Maleme also reported at least one torpedohit on the LITTORIO battleship at 1940/28.Fleet Re-formed.

40. At 0430 the Commander-in-Chief alteredcourse to 250 degs. and informed the fleet thathe was keeping W/T silence. At daylight anair search was flown off from FORMIDABLEand between 0600 and 0700 all units of thefleet rejoined the Commander-in-Chief. It wasthought that at least one of our destroyers musthave beep seriously damaged in all the firingsubsequent to the main action, but no shipreported either damage or casualties, OneSwordfish was later reported missing.

41. At 0800 the Commander-in-Chief was inposition 35 degs. 43 mins. N., 21 degs. 40 mins.E., and course was set 220 degs. to sweep thearea of the action. Between 0950 and noomany boats and rafts with Italian survivorswere seen and a large number of survivors werepicked up by destroyers, but at noo enemyaircraft were sighted and as there was no reportof enemy surface ships anywhere in the vicinity,course was set 120 degs. for Alexandria. A

* Admiralty footnote: — Subsequent information hasestablished that the report of the Naval Attache,Athens, was incorrect in that no ship was hit in theseattacks by R.A.F. aircraft although some near misseswere scored.

Page 8: THIRD SUPPLEMENT The Londo - ibiblio.org · Of TUESDAY, the zgth of JULY, 1947 by finfyotity Registered as a newspaper THURSDAY, 31 JULY, 1947 BATTLE OF MATAPAN. The following Despatch

3598 SUPPLEMENT TO THE LONDON GAZETTE, 31 JULY, 1947

signal was broadcast to the Chief of the ItalianNaval Staff giving the position of the remainingsurvivors. The Greek flotilla was ordered toreturn to Athens.

42. The fleet was shadowed during theforenoon and at 1530 a dive-bombing attackwas made by about 12 JU.88s, the main attackbeing directed on FORMIDABLE. There wasno damage, however, the fleet " umbrellabarrage " proving effective. One JU.88 wasshot down and one Fuhnar crashed in the seajust before landing on. There were shadowersduring the rest of the day but no further attackdeveloped. STUART, GRIFFIN and HERE-WARD were detached at 0920 to Piraeus asescort for Convoy G.A.8, and AJAX, PERTH,DEFENDER and HASTY at 1930 to Suda Bayin order to cover Aegean convoys. BONA-VENTURE was also detached at this time tojoin convoy G.A.8 at daylight 30th March.Damage Inflicted on the Enemy.

43. It was not at all clear to the Commander-in-Chief what ships had been sunk, and the fateof the LITTORIO battleship was in doubt. Butit seemed certain from the 900 survivors onboard ships of the fleet that POLA was thedamaged cruiser that had been detected stoppedand that she had been sunk; that the two 8-inchcruisers engaged by the battlefleet were ZARAand FIUME and that they were both sunk; thatHAVOCK had sunk one destroyer and thebattlefleet possibly another; in addition theremight be further losses due to the Royal AirForce bombing attacks. It was also a possi-bility that the enemy had suffered damage in anencounter between their own forces.

March, 1941 — Fleet Return to Alexandria.44. The fleet continued to Alexandria and

arrived there at 1730. An 8.79 shadower wasshot down by fleet fighters at 0834. A sub-marine was reported just as the fleet enteredthe Great Pass and the destroyer screen wereordered to clear the area ahead of the fleet withdepth charges. This operation had no resultapart from creating a marked impression on theItalian survivors.

From: THE VICE ADMIRAL, LIGHT FORCES,MEDITERRANEAN, H.M.S.- ORION.To: THE COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF,

MEDITERRANEAN.Date: loth April, 1941.

ORION, AJAX, PERTH, GLOUCESTER,VENDETTA^ and HEREWARD, havingfuelled, left Piraeus at 1300 on 27th March,1941.

2. GLOUCESTER had, on the previous day,run a plummer block bearing and had replacedit with a spare while in Piraeus, but at thesame time divers had found excessive slacknessin one "A" bracket and her maximum safespeed had to be regarded as 24 knots.

3. ILEX and HASTY were ordered to leaveSuda Bay so as to join the cruisers thirty milessouth of Gavdo Island (in position 34 2Q N.,24 10 E.) at 0630 on 28th March.

4. On the way HEREWARD examined anA/S contact dn approximate position 012 degs.Phalconera 15 miles. This may have been thewreck of the U-Boat attacked by VENDETTAon i8th March in this position. Light oil wasstill to be seen on the surface in the vicinity.

5. The passage to the rendezvous was madewithout incident and at 0607 on 28th March two

destroyers were sighted to the northward whichproved to be ILEX and HASTY.

6. The course of 200 degs. at 0645 wasselected to take the squadron further from thelikely area of enemy air reconnaissance, whileremaining in a position suitable for anyeventuality.

PHASE I (0630-1230).7. As soon as the enemy aircraft shadowing

was identified, at 0633, as a type that is some-times carried in catapult ships, it was realisedthat enemy surface forces might be in thevicinity. But when the first enemy report fromone of FORMIDABLE'S aircraft reported fourcruisers and four destroyers (a force identicalin composition with my own;, some 35 miles tothe north-east of my position, steering a coursesimilar to my own, I was in some doubtwhether it was not, in fact, my own force thatwas being reported. Enemy warships weresighted astern before any further aircraftreports had been received and decoded.

8. The enemy sighted were at once suspectedof being ZARA class, since cruisers of thisclass had been reported at sea on the previousday by flying boats. This suspicion soonproved correct. Knowing that vessels of thatclass could outrange my squadron and that,having superior speed, they could choose therange I decided to try to draw them towardsour own battlefleet and carrier.

9. The enemy followed and opened fire at25,500 yards at 0812. At the same time oneof the enemy cruisers was seen to catapult oneaircraft. The fire was accurate to begin withand the enemy appeared to be concentratingon GLOUCESTER. She snaked the line toavoid hits.

10. At 0829, when the range had closed to23,500 yards, GLOUCESTER opened fire withthree salvos, but they all fell short. The enemymade an alteration of some 35 degs. away afterthe first salvo and put himself outside our gunrange. After this time, although the enemyresumed a course similar to my own and con-tinued to fire till 0855, all his salvos fell short.

11. GLOUCESTER flew off her aircraft at0830 and it carried out action observation, buther reports were not received in ORION owingto her not using the frequency ordered.

12. During this action VENDETTA soonbegan to lag behind and caused someembarrassment. By 0834 sh6 was about threemiles astern and I ordered her to steer to thesouthward clear of the action.

13. At 0855 the enemy turned away to portand ceased fire. He eventually steadied on acourse of about 300 degs. I decided tofollow and endeavour to keep touch.VENDETTA, by cutting off corners, rejoinedat 0925. She was ordered to join the battlefleet.

14. At 0854 a signal from aircraft 5F hadbeen received, reporting 3 enemy battleships at0805 in a position which was seven miles frommy own position at 0805. Though this reportwas manifestly incorrect as regards position, itprepared me for a meeting with enemy battle-ships at any moment.

15. H.M.S. FORMIDABLE reported that atabout 1045 or iioo, her striking force wasfired at by my squadron. This may have beenso. Fire was opened on various unidentifiedsingle aircraft at long range about this time.

Page 9: THIRD SUPPLEMENT The Londo - ibiblio.org · Of TUESDAY, the zgth of JULY, 1947 by finfyotity Registered as a newspaper THURSDAY, 31 JULY, 1947 BATTLE OF MATAPAN. The following Despatch

SUPPLEMENT TO THE LONDON GAZETTE, 31 JULY, 1947 3599

16. A battleship was sighted to the northwardat 1058. Half a minute later she opened anaccurate fire from about 32,000 yards and notime was lost in altering to the southward,increasing to full speed and making smoke.ORION was the target for the first ten minutesand the first salvos fell over. ORION wasstraddled and suffered minor damage from anear mass.

17. When the smoke began to take effect,GLOUCESTER, being to windward, was theonly ship in view to the enemy battleship andshe became the target. She was repeatedlystraddled. The destroyers could hardly keepup at the speed of about 31 knots which thecruiser wa,s maintaining. Only one destroyer,HASTY, succeeded eventually in reaching aposition from which her smoke was of any

\ benefit to GLOUCESTER.j 18. At 1127 our own aircraft attacked the

•' enemy with torpedoes and she turned awayand ceased fire, though owing to the smoke,I did not know this until GLOUCESTER'Ssignal reporting this fact got through the smokeat 1138.

19. Information for the enemy's movementsduring iHhis 28-minute action is very scanty, asthe battleship was only occasionally sightedfrom GLOUCESTER and PERTH. Sheappears to have steered a course approximately160 degs. at 31 knots or more. Nothing couldbe seen to the north and west on account ofsmoke and I felt sure that the enemy cruiserswhich I had been fallowing would now beclosing my force -from the north-west.

20. When certain that the enemy had ceasedfire, I ordered ships to stop making smoke.This took some time to clear, and when the

/ ' horizon could be seen (at 1148) there wasnothing in sight. The enemy cruisers evidentlyproceeded to join the battleship.

21. Course was now steered to make contactwith our own battlefleet. When touch wasgained at 1230, it was found that my position,which had been confirmed within one mile bya fix at noon, was 10 miles 342 degs. from thatwhich the battlefleet had been using.

PHASE II (1230-1800).22. ILEX, HASTY and HEREWARD were

detached to join the battlefleet, and the cruisersdrew ahead on a bearing of 290 degs. from thebattlefieet to maximum V/S distance, asordered in your 1305.

23. At 1651 I received your 1644 orderingme to press on and gain touch with thedamaged enemy battleship. Speed wasincreased to 30 knots.

PHASE III (1800/28-0700/29).24. I decided to spread the cruisers by 2000

in order to locate the damaged enemy battle-ship. Orders to start spreading were given at1907, but when, seven minutes later, three orfour ships were sighted ahead against the after-glow, these were taken to be enemy cruisersdropping 'back to drive off shadowers and Iconcentrated my squadron to deal with them.

25. At 1935 and 1945 the enemy's retalia-tion to the dusk torpedo attack by our ownaircraft could be distinctly seen from mysquadron some 12 miles away. The sky wasfilled with streams of tracer ammunition ofvarious colours and they must have been' very

gallant men who went through it to get theirtorpedoes home.

26. As it was evident that a large number ofships was in close company I decided to closeconcentrate. Speed was kept down to reducebow waves.

27. At 2015 ORION obtained a deflection byRadar of a vessel six miles ahead. At the sametime GLOUCESTER saw a dark object low inthe water on the port bow about a mile away.This was not seen from ORION and was notreported by GLOUCESTER at the time. Speedwas reduced to 15 knots, and over a period ofeighteen minutes, Radar ranges were plotted,proving that the vessel was stopped or movingvery slowly. She was thought to be a largevessel, bigger than any cruiser, and withoutother vessels in the vicinity unless they werealongside her. AJAX reported the same objectby W/T.

28. By 2033 ORION was within three and ahalf miles of mis vessel, which I thought at thetime to be the damaged battleship because ofher size. She still could not be seen.

29. At this juncture I decided to lead thesquadron clear to the northward and thencontinue in search of the remaining ships. Ifthis ship was the battleship she was " fixed,"and, if not, dt was necessary to regain touch.

30. The Commander - in - Chief, actingpresumably on AJAX'S report, ordered theI4th and 2nd Destroyer Flotillas to attack thebattleship, giving her position exactly asreported by AJAX, but giving her speed as 13knots on a course of 295 degs.

31. At 2040, I reported the same vessel asstopped, and supposed that Captain (D), I4thDestroyer Flotilla, would attack her in thatposition.

32. I was considering spreading the cruisersto find the remainder, when I realised that, ifCaptain (D), I4th Destroyer Flotilla, wentfurther west on the assumption that the enemywas moving at 13 knots, he would almostcertainly encounter our cruisers. Furthermore,the enemy had been reported as having alteredcourse to 230 degs. during the dusk torpedoattack1 and it seemed that he might now besteering, if anything, to the northward of 295degs., if, as I suspected, he was making forMessina.

33. At 2155 AJAX reported deflection byRadar of three vessels, five miles to the south-ward of us. This would be rather farther westthan our flotillas were likely to have reachedat the time but I decided to keep concentratedand steer more to the north so as to keep clearof them, and later to alter course and increasespeed so as to intercept any part of the enemyforce that might have continued towardsMessina, on a course of about.300 degs.

34. I kept on to the north-west so as not tobe silhouetted against the star shell that werebeing used during the night action then inprogress astern.

35. During this time a red pyrotechnic signalwas sighted to the north-west at what seemed along range, though it was difficult to judge itsdistance. I was about to spread when yoursignal was received ordering all forces notactually engaged to withdraw to tihe north-east.

(Signed) H. D. PRIDHAM-WIPPELL,Vice-Admiral.

Page 10: THIRD SUPPLEMENT The Londo - ibiblio.org · Of TUESDAY, the zgth of JULY, 1947 by finfyotity Registered as a newspaper THURSDAY, 31 JULY, 1947 BATTLE OF MATAPAN. The following Despatch

34_°N.

A. A&ABRUZZI> V*GAR|BALOIOT/PiF'UME

•P.U,̂ POLA^O%' ZARA

34a

N.

0829DPEN Fl.._(3SALVOSJ

FIRE

2|4C

DIAGRAM N°l

THE BATTLE OF MATAPANPositJons at 0800. March 28T.HI94I.Note..Position of Force Z is estimated.

Scale of Milesis 20

25°E.

WARSPITE

Page 11: THIRD SUPPLEMENT The Londo - ibiblio.org · Of TUESDAY, the zgth of JULY, 1947 by finfyotity Registered as a newspaper THURSDAY, 31 JULY, 1947 BATTLE OF MATAPAN. The following Despatch

— '

25°E

34°N. SIGHTED BY GLOUCESTER'S AIRCRAFT

BUT NOT YET REPORTED

34C

Nn ~ .- -,

PURGE L.

0853 CEASED FIRE

0853

DIAGRAM N°2

THE BATTLE OF MATAPANPositions at 0900, Cruisers cease firing- at 0853.

Note.-Position of Force 2 is estimated.Scale of Miles

4=J?—k

WARSPITE

30 40

25°E

Page 12: THIRD SUPPLEMENT The Londo - ibiblio.org · Of TUESDAY, the zgth of JULY, 1947 by finfyotity Registered as a newspaper THURSDAY, 31 JULY, 1947 BATTLE OF MATAPAN. The following Despatch

24°E. ' 25°

POLA

FlUMEGARIBALDI

ABRUZZI

\FORCEY^AV.VENETO & 4DESTROYERS

\T R E N T O ' / V°pEN F IRE IO58IESTEBOLZANO

T R I E S T E / x

•»

ORION &FORCE B

N

DIAGRAM N?3

THE BATTLE OF MATAPANCruisers contact with V.Veneto.MOO.

Scale of Miles WARSP1TE ̂ ^I 0 5 10 15 ?0 30 40 vvAKbHIlt VA«'oc I I 1 I 1 I 1 t IZ4 t.

Page 13: THIRD SUPPLEMENT The Londo - ibiblio.org · Of TUESDAY, the zgth of JULY, 1947 by finfyotity Registered as a newspaper THURSDAY, 31 JULY, 1947 BATTLE OF MATAPAN. The following Despatch

ZARA

GARIBALDIABRUZZI

24°E,

TRENTOTRIESTE

FORCE YVVENETO CEASE FIRE

34°

ORIONAJAXPERTH *%GLOUCESTER ^l 24° E

DIAGRAM N°4

THE BATTLE OF MATAPANFirst T/B attack from Formidable, 1130.

Surface contact lost.Scale of Miles

20 30 4010=t-

15

WARSPITE

Page 14: THIRD SUPPLEMENT The Londo - ibiblio.org · Of TUESDAY, the zgth of JULY, 1947 by finfyotity Registered as a newspaper THURSDAY, 31 JULY, 1947 BATTLE OF MATAPAN. The following Despatch

*fcl FIUMEGARIBALDI.

"x^ ABRUZ21

34°N.

'x, BOLZANO

XFORCE Y

— «V.VENE

22|°E.

DIAGRAM N?5

THE BATTLE OF MATAPANSecond T/B attack from Formidable, 1530.

Scale of Miles1!

N.

Page 15: THIRD SUPPLEMENT The Londo - ibiblio.org · Of TUESDAY, the zgth of JULY, 1947 by finfyotity Registered as a newspaper THURSDAY, 31 JULY, 1947 BATTLE OF MATAPAN. The following Despatch

35°N.

DIAGRAM N°6

THE BATTLE OF MATAPANDusk T/B attack, 1930.Cruising Dispositions.

Scale of Miles

22

Page 16: THIRD SUPPLEMENT The Londo - ibiblio.org · Of TUESDAY, the zgth of JULY, 1947 by finfyotity Registered as a newspaper THURSDAY, 31 JULY, 1947 BATTLE OF MATAPAN. The following Despatch

20'

ESTIMATED POSITION

V.VENETOTRENTO

TRIESTEBOLZANO

35°30'

\

4 DESTROYERSFIUME

7ARA

2fE. DIAGRAM N?7

THE BATTLE OF MATAPANNight, Action (I) , 2215.

Scale of Miles0 5 10 15 20

1 ... .-j==—| —1- i fc30

APOLAfSTOPPEO;

2I|0E.

Page 17: THIRD SUPPLEMENT The Londo - ibiblio.org · Of TUESDAY, the zgth of JULY, 1947 by finfyotity Registered as a newspaper THURSDAY, 31 JULY, 1947 BATTLE OF MATAPAN. The following Despatch

td

35°3Q'N.

2CT30'\ ESTIMATED POSITION

2I°|E 2!°30'

fcW.VENETOV/S.TRENTO^TRIESTE*\ BOLZANO

\ &DESTROYERS

DIAGRAM N°8

THE BATTLEoF MATAPANNight Action (ii) 2230.

Scale of Miles

T ? 20

D.I4&7 DESTROYERS

^:^S-

I20°30'

GREYHOUND& GRIFFIN

TRACK OF

BATTLEFLEET

CRUISER ORDESTROYER SUNK?

2IfE 2I°30'

Page 18: THIRD SUPPLEMENT The Londo - ibiblio.org · Of TUESDAY, the zgth of JULY, 1947 by finfyotity Registered as a newspaper THURSDAY, 31 JULY, 1947 BATTLE OF MATAPAN. The following Despatch

,Xo20 ^TO TARANTO ?.\\\\

ESTIMATED POSITIONV.VENETO

2S°E.I

36°N.

ORIONVAJAXPERTH

GLOUCESTER

DIAGRAM N?9

THE BATTLE OF MATAPANPositions at Midnight, 28^/29*

22*

AScaJe of Miles* ° » 40

DJ4&7 DESTROYERS

ARSPITE

N.

35°30' 35°30'

|GREYHOUND&GRIFFIN

D.IO. STUART

HAVOCK

2I°E.

Page 19: THIRD SUPPLEMENT The Londo - ibiblio.org · Of TUESDAY, the zgth of JULY, 1947 by finfyotity Registered as a newspaper THURSDAY, 31 JULY, 1947 BATTLE OF MATAPAN. The following Despatch

20b30'i 21?E. 2I°30'

JERVIS,D.14NUBIANMOHAWKJANUS

ILEX.D.2.HASTYHEREWARDHOTSPUR>.

35°/5'

N.

GREYHOUND V.GRIFFIN

FIUME, LIGHTS & RAFTSFIRST SURVIVORS O(LEADING DESTROYER?)

D. 14.,D.2.& DESTROYERS WITH HAVOCK,GRIFFIN& GREYHOUND TO RENDEZVOUS WITHC./NC.AT 07OO.

O400 ° '35°/5O300 N.

DIAGRAM N?IO

THE BATTLE OF MATAPANFrom Midnight to 0400, March 29*1941.

Destroyers clearing- up.Scale of Miles

20°30

Page 20: THIRD SUPPLEMENT The Londo - ibiblio.org · Of TUESDAY, the zgth of JULY, 1947 by finfyotity Registered as a newspaper THURSDAY, 31 JULY, 1947 BATTLE OF MATAPAN. The following Despatch

LONDONPRINTED AND PUBLISHED BY HIS MAJESTY'S STATIONERY OFFICETo be purchased directly from H.M. Stationery Office at the following addresses :

York House, Kingsway, London, W.C.2 ; 13a Castle Street, Edinburgh, 2 ̂39-41 King Street, Manchester, 2; 1 St. Andrew's Crescent, Cardiff;

Tower Lane, Bristol, 1 ; 80 Chichester Street, BelfastOR THROUGH ANY BOOKSELLER

1947Price One Shilling net

S.O. Code No. 65-38031