theory mecha file

Download Theory Mecha File

Post on 25-Oct-2015

36 views

Category:

Documents

5 download

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

a shit ton of theory

TRANSCRIPT

DISPOSITIONALITY GOOD 2AC

THEORY MAGIC

THEORYNegative Fiat EXISTS

LONG7SHORT8A/2 No Right to Counterplans9Conditionality Good

2NC102NR11A/2 Advocating Perms1213A/2 Argumentative Irresponsibility

A/2 Justifies Severance Perms14A/2 CPs are Different Worlds and Not Args Conditional15A/2 Strategy Skew16A/2 One CP bad interp17A/2 Justifies Infinite Worlds18A/2 Dispo Better19Conditionality Bad

2AC (Long)202AC (Short)211AR Overview22231AR (all args)

A/2 1AC checks SQ24A/2 Aff side bias25A/2 Unconditional Worse26A/2 Stick us with the CP27A/2 Time Skew Inevitable28A/2 CPs leads to opportunity costs29A/2 Dispo IS Conditionality30A/2 Perms Check31A/2 Key to Neg Strat32A/2 Negation Theory33A/2 No in round abuse34A/2 All args conditional35A/2 Time pressure good36A/2 Err negative37A/2 Only one conditional counterplan38A/2 Leads to adhoc theories39A/2 Topicality first4041A/2 Plan focus

42A/2 2AC strategy

A/2 Key to kritiks43A/2 Best Policy Option4445A/2 More real world

A/2 Potential abuse NOT a voter462AR

Overview47

A/2 Err negative48A/2 All time tradeoffs reciprocal49A/2 All args conditional50A/2 2AC strategy51A/2 Only one conditional cp52A/2 No right to cover53A/2 Breadth54A/2 Multiple perms55A/2 Time pressure good56A/2 Conditional perms check57A/2 Time skew arbitrary58A/2 More real world59A/2 Best policy option60PICS BAD

2AC (Long)612AC (Short)621AR (Short)631AR (all args)64A/2 Key to test all of plan65A/2 Encourages spec plan writing66A/2 Lit checks67A/2 Net benefits checks68A/2 Best policy option69A/2 Key to check extra topical plan planks70A/2 Aff must defend 100% of plan71A/2 Encourages research72A/2 Inround abuse only73A/2 Topical pics check74A/2 Key to neg strat75A/2 More real world76A/2 Plan focus77A/2 Reject the arg78A/2 All cps are pics79A/2 Err negative80A/2 We get one pic812AR

Overview82A/2 Real world8384A/2 Encourages spec plan writing

A/2 Reject the arg, not the team85A/2 Net benefit/competition checks8687A/2 Aff must defend 100% of plan

A/2 Encourages research88A/2 Key to neg ground89PICS GOOD

2nc (Long)902NC (Short)912NR

Overview92A/2 NO Aff ground93A/2 Leads to vague plan text94A/2 Other counterplans are okay95A/2 Net benefit alone is enough96A/2 Inifitely regressive97A/2 Bad advocacy98Dispositionality good

2NC (Long)992NC (Short)1002NR

A/2 Perms dont check101

A/2 Straight turns dont check102A/2 No aff side bias103104A/2 Education

A/2 Your cp is conditional105A/2 Multiple worlds106A/2 No advocacy1072NR Overview108DISPOSITIONALITY BAD

2AC (Long)109 2AC (Short)1101AR

A/2 (All args)111Overview112A/2 Outweighs topicality113A/2 Key to neg strat114A/2 Conditional perms worse115A/2 Plan focus/neg theory116A/2 Best policy option117A/2 Real world118A/2 2ac chooses our strategy119A/2 No in round abuse120A/2 Time skew arbitrary121A/T Just stick us with the counterplan122A/T No right to cover123A/T Discuss more issues124A/T Time pressure good125A/T Err negative126A/T Were not going for CP127A/T Multiple perms worse128A/T Were going for CP129A/T Addons check130A/T Unconditionality worse131A/T Only one dispo cp132A/T Unconditionality IS multiple aff worlds133A/T Straight turns check134A/T Perms check135A/T All args are dispo136A/T Education137A/T Strat skew inevitable138A/T Err neg139A/T Reject the arg140A/T Time tradeoff reciprocal141A/T Aff side bias142A/T Severence/intrinsic perms justify1432AR

Overview144TEXTUAL COMPETITION BAD

2AC145A/2 Key to testing146A/2 Not infinitely regressive147A/2 Justifies 2ac clarifications148A/2 CX doesnt check1492AR

Overview150TEXTUAL COMPETITION GOOD

2NC1512NR

Overview152A/2 Cross-ex checks153A/2 Leads to semantics games154A/2 Not real world155A/2 Infinitely regressive156TOPICAL CPs BAD 2AC1571AR

Overview158A/2 Best policy option159160A/2 Err negative

A/2 Education161A/2 Key to negative ground162TOPICAL CPs GOOD2NC163AGENT CPs BAD

2AC (Long)1642AC (Short)1651AR

(All args)166A/2 Must defend agent167A/2 Limit the topic168A/2 Literature checks abuse169A/2 Literature demands agent CPs170A/2 Best policy option171A/2 Encourages specific plan writing172A/2 Competition checks1732AR

Oveview174AGENT CPs GOOD

2NC (Long)1752NC (Short)1762nr

overview177A/2 Net benefit alone is sufficient178A/2 Kills topic specific debate179A/2 Infinitely regressive180A/2 Forces aff to argue against selves181A/2 Encourages vague plan writing182A/2 Moot 1ac183OBJECT FIAT BAD

2AC1841AR

A/2 Net benefits check abuse185A/2 All CPs are object fiat186A/2 Key to neg ground187A/2 Key to test federal govt1882AR

Overview189OBJECT FIAT GOOD

2NC1902NR

Overview191A/2 Moots 1ac192A/2 Infinitely regressive193ARTIFICIALLY COMPETITIVE CPs BAD194ARTIFICIALLY COMPETITIVE CPs GOOD19550 state fiat good 2NC197INTERNATIONAL FIAT BAD

2AC1981AR

A/2 Disproves the resolution199A/2 Literature checks200A/2 Agent is a key resolution question2012AR

202Overview

INTERNATIONAL FIAT GOOD

2NC

2NR203Overview204205A/2 Judge is a us policymaker

A/2 International orgs = multiple countries206207A/2 Infinitely regressive

50 STATE FIAT BAD

2AC (Long)2082AC (Short)2091AR

210(All Args)

A/2 Its run every year211A/2 Competition checks212A/2 Its should/would213A/2 Tests federal2142AR

Overview2155O STATE FIAT GOOD

2NC (Long)2162NC (Short)2172NR

Overview218A/2 Its utopian219A/2 Infinitely regressive220A/2 No literature221A/2 It isnt reciprocal222Severance Permutations Bad223Severance Permutations Good224226Time Frame Permutations Good

Intrinsicness Permutations Good227Perms

A/2 Cant perm a kritik229CONSULTATION BAD

A/2 Multiple perms bad230NEW 2NC CPs 1AR2312AR

Overview232233A/2 Best policy option

A/2 2ACcritical thinking234A/2 Its a constructive235A/2 Moots 1nc counterplan value236NEW 2NC CPs GOOD

2NC (Long)2372NC (Short)2382NR

Overview239A/2 Internsic perms justified240A/2 Leeway on 1ar arguments241DELAY CPs GOOD

2NC (Long)2422NC (Short)2432NR

A/2 Plan is done later244A/2 Justifies intrinsicness246ASPEC 2AC2471AR

A/2 Solvency deficit248

249Overview

FIAT SHOULD BE IMMEDIATE250FIAT DOESNT HAVE TO BE IMMEDIATE251MULTI-ACTOR FIAT BAD252MULTI-ACTOR FIAT GOOD253Ks Must Have a Text Alt

1AR Overview255A/2 Tags/Cards = Advocacy256Piks bad 2AC257Floating PIKS Dad 1AR 258259Negative Framework 2NC FIAT Bad

A/2 must spec cp status in the 1nc (Short)260A/2 Must spec cp status in 1nc (Long)261A/2 MUST SPEC CP STATUS

2NR Overview263A/2 Its my cross-ex264A/2 Youre stuck with the cp265A/2 Not specifying isnt fair266267A/2 Leads to Conditionality

MISC - Negative fiat exists 2nc268MISC Theory is not a voter269MISC Err negative on theory270MISC Potential abuse is a voter271A/2 REVERSE INHERENCY272A/2 COUNTER-PERMS273A/2 WHOLE REZ274EXTRA-TOPICALITY GOOD275EXTRA-TOPICALITY BAD276EFFECTS T GOOD277EFFECTS T BAD278GRAMMAR STANDARD BAD279SPEED GOOD

SHORT280281SPEED GOOD LONG VERSION (1/4)

-284negative fiat inevitable 2NC (long)negative fiat is inevitable and is the only non-side biased standard for the round-

1. Reciprocity- The aff has the option to suspend reality for durationo of plan implementation, negative ground is based on fiat cutting both ways.The 1AC is a 9 minute straight turn to the squo. If we have to defend the straight turned squo then the aff should have to defend all plan implementation processes (insert L or F spec)2. real world- Policy makers negate competing policies all the time. Real world education is critical to create effective advocates (if its a K debate, link to how effective 3. Best policy Post 1ac debate is supposed to be a debate on how to best solve a harm- negative fiat is critical to ensuring full testing of the 1AC which is key to fairness, excluding sections of the 1ac from discussion, is exclusionary to the negative and proves the aff has not met their presumptive burden, vote neg.4. There is no abuse, permutations check artifical and non-competitive counterplans.5. No aff fiat- the aff has to prove this is intrinsic ground. any abuse is checked by permuatations.6. Ground- Counterplans are critical to negative flexibility, we cant be expected to 7. Opportunity Cost- The counterplan is an opportunity cost to the plan- Neg fiat is just a way of testing if the options precluded by plan implementation are preferable to the plan.negative fiat inevitable 2nc (short)Allowing negative fiat is the only fair standard for the round-

1. Reciprocity- The aff has the option to suspend reality for durationo of plan implementation, negative ground is based on fiat cutting both ways.

2. Status quo is not an option- The 1AC is a 9 minute straight turn to the squo. If we have to defend the straight turned squo then the aff should have to defend all plan implementation processes

3. real world- Policy makers negate competing policies all the time. Real world education is critical because debate is an educational activity to prepare debaters for real life advocacy.

4. Ground- Counterplans are critical to negative strategy and our ability to check back aff side bias and infinite prep.

5. Side negative- they have the first and last speech and infite prep. this argument uniquely justifies it because not allowing negative fiat assures negs lose 100% of debatesnegative fiat inevitable 2nr at: no right to counterplans1. Counterplans are key to ground- Counterplans are key to test the best policy option/2. Disads not an alternative- the aff can outweigh any disad at the impact caculus level.

3. Negation theory subsum