the€case€for antigravity - visionary-knowledge.com case for antigravity.pdf ·...
TRANSCRIPT
1
The Case ForAntigravity
2
Introductionn Basic Questions:
u What is Gravity?u What is AntiGravity?u What evidence is there that technology, other than
“conventional”aerospace technology exists which could bethought of as being “AntiGravity”or something attemptingto control Gravity?
n We will look at:u Some of the history of Antigravity Researchu Some of the Research of Nick Cooku The Hutchison Effectu Some Antigravity Experimentsu Coral Castle (Florida)u Alleged Black Projects in the USAu Sightings of Flying Trianglesu Hints of “New Technology”which have come from NASA
3
n Newtonian theory says:u“gravity, Force of
attraction that arisesbetween objects by virtueof their masses.”(ChambersEnglish Dictionary –CD ROM edition1996)
uThe force of gravityobeys an “inversesquare law”–at twice agiven distance, the forceis only 1 quarter asstrong.
What is Gravity 1?
4
What is Gravity 2?
nn Einsteinian Gravity (Relativity)Einsteinian Gravity (Relativity)uu A planet's orbit around the Sun (as observed inA planet's orbit around the Sun (as observed in
threethreedimensional space) arises from its natural trajectorydimensional space) arises from its natural trajectoryin modified spacein modified spacetime; there is no need for a force oftime; there is no need for a force ofgravity coming from the Sun and acting on the planet. Thisgravity coming from the Sun and acting on the planet. Thisexplains oddities in the orbit of Mercury (the precession ofexplains oddities in the orbit of Mercury (the precession ofthe Perihelion), not explained by Newtonian Gravitationthe Perihelion), not explained by Newtonian Gravitation(Hutchinson(Hutchinson’’s Concise Encyclopaedia, CDs Concise Encyclopaedia, CDROM Edition 1996)ROM Edition 1996)
5
What is Gravity 3?n Gravity is WEAK in comparison to the other forces of
nature.n String theory suggests, then, that:
u Gravity may be similar to other forces.u Part of its force acts “in another dimension”.u Alternatively, it may be a force “leaking”from another
dimension into our own.n This could account for it being difficult to measure G,the
“gravitational constant”accurately (it is given a value of6.67 x 1011).
n Though String Theory seems to be the most popular as away of explaining Gravity, there is another theory calledLoop Quantum Gravity.
n Does any of this sound like a good explanation ofGravity?
6
What is NOT AntiGravity/AnAntiGravity Device?
n A chair is NOT an antigravitydevice (by my definition!) simplybecause it stops you falling down. (Achair is simply a rigid structure which resists theforce of gravity.)
n A balloon is NOT an antigravitydevice –it floats because of massdisplacement (ArchimedesPrinciple).
n A Propeller/Jet/Rocket Engine isNOT an antigravity device. It worksby displacing mass from one placeto another to generate thrust.
n An Ion engine is not an AntiGravitydevice –it also works by massdisplacement, but is rather moreefficient with propellant mass thanChemical rockets.
7
What is AntiGravity/An AntiGravity Device?
n Any device / method capable of changing the localgravitational field strength or having the effect of reducingan object’s weight. (No “propellant”)
n Another term might simply be Gravity Control.
McMinville Saucer (PaulTrent, May 8, 1950)
Lifter 1 –JL NaudinExperimental Model
TT Brown’s ExperimentalGravitator Disk
8
n When working through Antigravity research, several thingsseem to recuru Devices spinning very quickly or having spinning
components at high speed.u Feeding in High Voltage –Electrograviticsu Using Strong Magnetic Fields –Magnetograviticsu High Frequency Oscillations of Electric Current or Magnetic
Field.
General Characteristics of AntiGravity Devices & Experiments
Simulation of Gordon Cooper’s1955 Sighting near Edward’s AFB
Andreason MicrowavePropulsion –Paul Potter
9
History of AntiGravity Research 1n This may have even started in the early
days of electric power, around 1900.n According to Nick Cook’s research
(discussed later), there was opendiscussion of the subject among groupsof scientists until about 1956, when itseemed to become the subject ofridicule and/or went “underground”.
n There are many historical, evenmythological, figures who havesupposedly experimented with gravitycontrol.
n Two prominent names are Nikola Teslaand Thomas Townsend Brown.
Nikola Tesla (18561943)
Thomas TownsendBrown (19051985)
10
Nikola Teslan Tesla was born in Serbia and emigrated to
the US in 1884.n Tesla was mainly a pioneer in the fields of
Electrostatics and Electricity Generation (withThomas Edison) and invented the AlternatingCurrentbased electricity distribution systemwe use today.
n It was his work which paved the way for similarpioneering work in the field of Electrograviticsby people like Brown.
n The unit of Magnetic Field Flux Density isnamed after Tesla.
n It is claimed that Tesla built and operated OverUnity (“energy for nothing”) devices.
n After his death, most of his notes and papersdisappeared.
n Many stories about him have also beensnowballed in myth and legend, in much thesame way as those in the UFO field.
Nikola Tesla (18561943)
11
Thomas Townsend Brown 1n Thomas Townsend Brown was born in
Ohio.n Townsend Brown never obtained a
degree. He spent time studying at severalschools including Caltech, Kenyon Collegeand Denison University.
n He has been called a Physicist but wasprobably an Electrical Engineer more thananything else.
n He served in the US Navy in the 1930’s atthe Naval Research Laboratory.
n He was involved in Project Winterhaven –a research proposal to build an AntiGravity craft, based on the work TownsendBrown had already completed.
n He died in California in 1985.n Much of his work still seems to be kept
“under wraps”and his family keep a lowpublic profile.
Thomas TownsendBrown (19051985)
12
Thomas Townsend Brown 2n He worked with Dr. Paul Biefeld
(friend of Albert Einstein), Directorof Swazey Observatory in Denison,Ohio.
n In 1923, they started to experimentwith “gravitators”and found aninteraction between electric chargeand the force of gravity.
n Separate to his study of Physics,Townsend Brown founded NICAP(National Investigations Committeeon Aerial Phenomenon) in 1956, toserve as a clearinghouse and"listening post" for informationregarding Saucer sightings andevidence.
n He served for some time asDirector of NICAP (as did MajorDonald Keyhoe).
13
Thomas Townsend Brown 3n He worked in a field which has come
to be known as Electrogravitics.n TTB patented a number of his
“inventions”n In the 1950’s, he worked at the
Bahnson Lab.n In a response letter written to an
interested person in January 1982,TTB wrote:
“I regret to advise you thatelectrogravitic research has beentaken over in its entirety by aCalifornian corporation which hasimposed secrecy at least until theirinvestigations are completed”.
Electrokinetic Apparatus at the BahnsonLab, January 3, 1958 –43 inch foil.
Dr Tom Turner, TTB and someone else,April 5, 1958.
14
n This effect was originally discovered when theywere working with high voltage X ray tubes –they moved excessively when turned on andoff.
n When a Capacitor is Charged up, it LOSESWEIGHT!
n Biefeld set Brown to workon the phenomenon
n More on this later…
The BiefeldBrown Effect
X ray tube
15
“ The Hunt For Zero Point”n Nick Cook, journalist and former editor of Jane’s
Defence Weekly became intrigued whensomeone sent him an article about antigravityresearch.
n He tried to follow up a contact, George S.Trimble, whom, he had read, had worked in thefield of antigravity research in the 50’s.
n Trimble initially agreed to be interviewed, butthen withdrew suddenly –reportedly “scared”.
n Cook continued his research “quietly”over 10years and journeyed some way into the “blackworld”of defence research during World War II.
n His book “The Hunt For Zero Point”is the storyof that journey.
n Here, he talks about some of his findings,initially about American Research.
16
Hans Kamlern One of the figures Nick
Cook encountered duringexploring German wartimeAntiGravity research wasHans Kamler.
n Hans Kamler seemed tohave been in charge ofNazi “Black Projects”.
n It is not known whatbecame of Kamler, as thereare 4 different accounts ofhis death, for example.
http://www.eyepod.org/NaziDiscPhotos.html
17
German Research & “ The Bell”n A number of unusual experiments seemed to
have been carried out by the Germans in the 40’se.g. Schauberger’s “Repulsine”, which was anoverunity implosion device, possibly similar to theHydrosonic Pump, but Schauberger reported hisactually lifted off during testing.
n One of the experiments Nick Cook found someevidence of was The Bell. It was conducted in amine in what is now Poland (but was Germany inWW II).
n As with similar experiments, it had componentsrotating at very high speed and it has been saidthat this would have the bizarre effect of“influencing the spacetime field”.
n This seems to be a recurrent theme –and suchexperiments are often said to produce anomalousenergy or field effects –much like those observednear Flying Saucers.
Repulsine 1
Artist’simpression of
“the Bell”
Repulsine 2
18
The BiefeldBrown Effect 2n Capacitorweighing Balance (Jean Louis Naudin).
19
Schematic of CapacitorweighingBalance
When VoltageA
pplied,“H
at”goes up
20
Capacitor in Plastic Bag…n The Ion Wind explanation seems less likely to be correct when you
see the experiment operating inside a plastic bag…
21
The BiefeldBrown Effect 5n Many scientists say that there is no electro
gravitic effect –it is a byproduct of airionisation or an “ionwind”
n However, calculations seem to show that “IonWind”alone is not enough to account for theamount of lift/thrust produced.
n With the Electric Balance, the Ion Wind shouldcease when the power is switched off (I think),but the balance levels as the capacitordischarges.
n It is fairly easy to build a Lifter… using a HighTension source (old TV), Balsa Wood andAluminium Foil
23
The Hutchison Effect 1n This the name given to what appeared in
the video clip with Boyd Bushman & NickCook (which some say is just a fraud).
n Bushman hinted to Nick Cook he shouldtake a trip to Vancouver to see JohnHutchison –the person who did the“tricks”in the video.
n Hutchison can produce this effect withbetween 75 W and 1.5 kW of power.
n In November 2008, he reproduced thelevitation effect as part of a “challenge”.
n Melting and Fusion of metals also seemsto be an occasional side effect –asshown in the photo (right).
24
The Hutchison Effect 2n John Hutchison’s Lab Equipment was confiscated on 24 February 1990 by
the direct order of former Canadian Prime Minister Brian Mulroney. TheGovernment has retained the lab in spite of a court order by Judge Paris ofthe Supreme Court of British Columbia to return it.
25
Wilbert Smith – Gravity Control(Anti Gravity)
n Wilbert Smith, who became theSuperintendent of Radio Regulations inCanada, postulated (in simple terms)that the force of Gravity was actually theresult of interacting magnetic fields thatobjects themselves generated.
n He suggested that a “motional”magneticfield might be used to influence gravityand he and his team designedexperiments to test this.
n It seems very unlikely that Smith wouldlie about his experimental results, ormisinterpret them.
26
Eugene Podkletnov /Ning Lee
n In 2002, Boeing, approached Podkletnov to work withthem on further research into blocking gravity.
n He has also done experiments with a “force beam”andweight reduction.
n Information is decidedly sketchy.n Ning Li worked on a “Gravity Shielding Device”at U. of
Alabama, but an article on space.com said:n The main university professor involved with the project,
Ning Li, has since left the school. She said she hasfounded a company in Huntsville that also will market agravityshield device.
n Li said she dropped the NASA collaboration and decidedto work independently after the agency "wasted" theproject's money and resources.
http://www.space.com/businesstechnology/technology/anti_grav_000928.html
27
Coral Castle – Built Using AntiGravity Methods?
n This is a tourist attraction in Florida.n It seems to have been built single
handedly by a Latvian immigrant,Edward Leedskalnin.
n Some of the blocks at Coral Castleweigh 30 tons, yet he seemed to havemoved them without heavy liftingequipment.
n Statements he made and equipment atthe site suggest he may have usedAntiGravity techniques to construct it.
n This idea is not taken seriously,despite the difficulties in explaining thestructures in any other way.
28
Black Projects Research at LockheedMartin 1
n Some people seem to dismiss the idea that AntiGravity technology has been researched by USdefence companies or the Air Force.
n In a documentary broadcast in 1999 on Channel 5,Boyd Bushman confirmed their research.
n Boyd Bushman also appeared to confirm that thisresearch had produced results.
n Nick Cook of Jane’s Defence Weekly spoke to him inabout 1998.
n Bushman’s words were:n “What we have is wonderful and it comes from
miracles occurring, but that that we will see is not whatwe have.”
n “I am refining and heading towards something that allyou have to do is charge and it is lifting up –it is losingweight.”
n “When we complete the technology, it should fly.”
29
Secret US Projects?n Over the last 50 years, there have been repeated
stories and claims that the US has developedadvanced craft, which seem to mimic some of thebehaviour of the craft flown by “the people topside”.
n People like Bob Lazar are fairly well known in thefield for these claims (Whilst Stanton Friedman doesnot believe Lazar’s claims, it is interesting to hearBoyd Bushman’s opinion… Bushman gives Lazarsome credit)
n Disclosure Project Witness, Mark McCandlishtestifies to knowledge of ARV’s (Alien ReproductionVehicles).
n Perhaps less well known is Edgar Fouché. He hadtop secret/crypto clearance and worked as anEngineering Programme Manager and SiteManager for US DoD contractors involved inclassified development between 1987 and 1995.
Bob Lazar
Mark McCandlish
Edgar Fouché
30
Fouché in Area 51n Edgar Fouché spoke to a number of people
involved in Black projects –including peoplewho piloted the SR71 (Blackbird)
n Fouché describes a story of secretly beingdriven to an “unknown desert location”to workon Crypto equipment, in which he was anexpert. But he knew this was somewhere nearGroom Lake, where secret aircraft, such as theF117 Stealth Fighter were tested.
n He states that, in the late 1970’s, when he hadto fix some equipment, he came across andinspected a module labelled "Direct OrbitalCode Link”, which contained advancedelectronics. The meaning of this was confirmedin later conversations about satellitecommunications.
n He states he overheard conversations, whileworking there, about QuasiCrystals whichwere an enabling technology for advancedcommunications and propulsion.
SR71
F117 Stealth Fighter
31
n Edgar Fouché describes a number of advancedaircraft.
n Even though the full specifications of the 30oddyear old SR71 are still classified, it is knownthat it could fly at 85,000 feet at speeds up toMach 3.3.
n The USAF now reportedly has the SR75 whichcan travel at up to 120,000 feet and Mach 5 –Nevadaó Russia in 3 hours! This was part ofProject Aurora.
n He describes SR75 as a “launcher”for the SR74, which can reach a height of 151 miles.
n SR75 can also launch a 2ton satellite payload.n Fouché describes the Space Shuttle as an
antique.n He also describes 2 orbital vehicles Space
Orbital Nuclear –Service Intercept Vehicle(SONSIV), code named Locust.
Fouché tells of More Advanced,Secret Aircraft
SR75 may looksimilar to this
“A vintage pieceMadam, have you had it
valued recently?”
32
TR3B – Secret USAF Craft 1n Fouché describes how he has seen
photographs of a triangular craft calledTR3B, taken by someone who wasgiving Mission Support on a C130.
n The TR3B is thought to be part of theAurora (Advanced Aircraft Development)programme.
n One of Fouché’s associates states hesaw the TR3B at Papoose (part of Area51). It hovered silently in the sameposition, for some 10 minutes, beforegently settling vertically to the tarmac. Attimes a corona of silver blue light glowedaround the circumference of the massiveTR3B.
n The operational model is 600 feet across.n Fouché states that at least 3 of the billion
dollar plus TR3Bs were flying by 1994.n The craft can travel at up to Mach 9 in
any direction (due to reduced Gforces).
33
TR3B – Secret USAF Craft 2n The TR3B's outer coating is reactive and
changes with radar stimulation and canchange reflectiveness, radarabsorptiveness, and colour.
n QuasiCrystals are used in the vehicle’sskin.
n Fouché describes part of the propulsion asbeing by Magnetic Field Disruption (MFD),which has been reverse engineered.
n Mercury based Plasma, pressurised at250,000 atmospheres & at a temperatureof 150K (123OC) is rotated at 50,000 rpm.
n This reduces the weight of the centre of thecraft by 89%. This increasesmanoeuvrability by 89% as well.
n Fouché states that MFD research hadstarted as early as 1955.
n TR3B uses Nuclear Thermal Hydrogen /Oxygen Engines for manoeuvring (technologymentioned by Fouché before recent NASA briefings –see later)
34
Results of the Research?
n Someone has suggested to me the followingequation may give an answer to what has beenproduced by this research…
(Tesla + Thomas Townsend Brown)x 30 years x ?billion dollars =
Spaceship!Spaceship!n So now, let’s review some history –and a
connection which spans across history
35
The Quicksilver Connection…n I am not the first to notice this, but
here is a video that I made aboutit!
n Mercury seems to be important inantigravitytechniques/technology…
n It is spoken ofu in relation to the Nazi Bell
Researchu The TR3Bu In the Vaimanika Shastra –the
ancient Indian Vedic text aboutVimanas
36
Flying Triangle Sightingsn Thousands have now been documented in a study by NIDS and other
individual researchers such as Omar Fowlern One was in the Sheffield Area in 1997n one was in Cannock Chase, UK, Staffordshire in 2002n http://ourstrangeplanet.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=vie
w&id=65&Itemid=60
37
John Lenard Walson’s Imagesn No clear answers as to what these show… . (Find various
videos on YouTube).n A series entitled “Far Above Space and Time”
38
A Link Between Gravity andMagnetism?
n A NASA Science Story from 20th April 2004 talksof a new probe …
n “In Search of GravitomagnetismGravity Probe B has left Earth to measure asubtle yet longsought force of Nature.”
39
NASA Briefings on the New Mars/MoonMissions – 11th Feb 2004
n So where is this technology, and how much isthere? Maybe General Les Lyles and General TomStafford know…
n Tom Stafford spoke on “Nuclear Electric”and“Nuclear Thermal Propulsion”–Edgar Fouchéspoke of this in 1998!
n These hearings /briefings were deleted off thespecial website that was set up only a few monthsafter they were posted
n Stafford was heard to say “The Air force does havea lot of technology… ”
n I thought it was NASA that developed space faringtechnology?
40
So if there is something real inall this…
üFree energy for everyone (not allowed)üFreedom for everyone who has the tech (not
allowed)üBUT Also…
IT’S ALREADY BEENWEAPONISED AND USED…
41
What Technology Can do this?n Steel turns to dust… .
http://www.drjudywood.com/
42
What Technology Can do this?n 8090% if 2 if the worlds tallest buildings
disappeared in 20 seconds… Where is the rubble?
http://www.drjudywood.com/
43
Levitation Effects on 9/11
John Hutchison LevitationDemonstration 01 Nov 2008 –at his Vancouver Apartment
Shortly after 9/11 (How didthe NYPD car get inverted?)
Dr Judy Wood has proposed that an undisclosed type ofDr Judy Wood has proposed that an undisclosed type ofDirected Energy Weapon was used to destroy most of theDirected Energy Weapon was used to destroy most of theWorld Trade Centre Complex on 9/11.World Trade Centre Complex on 9/11.
http://www.drjudywood.com/
46
Levitation Effects on 9/11n File no 9110506 Michael Macko (P4 P5) I realized I
couldn't get out from under the collapse. I dove under anESU truck that was facing north on the west side of WestStreet. I dove under that and waited for the building tocome down. When the building did come down, I actuallythought I was trapped, and the truck was blown off me,pushed off me, I guess. It was not there. At that point Iwas just really shocked and didn't know what was goingon at that point. I didn't know I was really, reallyshocked.)
n File No. 9110075 RENE DAVILA While we're walkingI realize that we only have two people. I see my vehicle.The seats are covered. I've still got my bag. I hold it like atrophy. Like people collect basketballs. I haven't touched whatever the force was, it was so strong that it wentinside of the bag.
See: http://tinyurl.com/911hestudy/
47
The Endn In a story Thomas Townsend Brown once told to
his family, he made an analogy, comparing aperson and UFOs/ET craft to a fish looking up atthe bottom of a passing ship."That fish looks up at that strange thing in hissky. It may have different properties, maybe size,prop wash or turbulence. Some fish will scatterand never look again, some fish will wonder, butnone of them will really know what that formrepresents. They will never know about whatother things man is capable of other than sailingacross that particular part of the ocean. We inmany ways are those fish, and the lights we seein our skies are the hulls of those ships."
48
Sources of Informationn JL Naudin’s marvellous site http://www.jlnlabs.org/n Nick Cook’s The Hunt For Zero Point (2002) (Available from Amazon
etc)n American Antigravity http://www.americanantigravity.com/n Archive of http://www.teegeeack.com/ufotr3bfs2002.html (no longer
available)n Jeff Rense sound archives http://www.rense.com/
n http://www.drjudywood.com/n UFO Casebook http://www.ufocasebook.com/n Fouche Presentation http://www.ufomind.com/misc/1998/aug/d26
001.shtmln Channel 5 Documentary Billion Dollar Secret (1999)n Channel 4 Documentary Welcome to the 11th Dimension (2003)n Channel 4 3part Documentary Riddle of the Skies (1999)n NASA Briefings at http://www.moontomars.org/ (no longer available)n Thomas Townsend Brown –http://www.soteria.com/n Coral Castle –http://www.coralcastle.com/