the regulation of investigatory powers act 2000 implications for the councils

11
The Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 Implications for the Councils

Upload: rodney-gaines

Post on 18-Jan-2016

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 Implications for the Councils

The Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000Implications for the Councils

Page 2: The Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 Implications for the Councils

Aspects of work that might merit surveillance ……

Fly tipping.

Illegal Money lenders – Loan Sharks

Fraud - Housing benefit, sub-letting, internal fraud, student loan audit, council tax, disability.

Food safety issues

Doorstep Crime Anti Social Behaviour Offences

Page 3: The Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 Implications for the Councils

RIPA and local authorities

Regulates the use of covert investigatory powers by Public Authorities

Ensures that those covert activities are compatible with Human Rights

Introduces Accountability

Page 4: The Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 Implications for the Councils

Justifying Local Authority use of covert techniques

There are no RIPA powers

RIPA simply provides a framework to govern our use of covert techniques to enforce existing consumer/public protection legislation

RIPA has improved control and oversight of these techniques and local authorities “performance” is improving

RIPA makes local authorities accountable and open to challenge – and that is a good thing

Page 5: The Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 Implications for the Councils

Terrorism laws used to spy on us ??

Watched while walking the dog?

Phone spies: Town halls using anti-terror powers to bug residents' calls and emails

Some councils are allowing middle-ranking staff to authorise covert operations

The whole of Britain has become a Panopticon.

Page 6: The Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 Implications for the Councils

The dog fouling debate

“ we do not consider dog fouling or littering as matters which meet the test of necessity and proportionality”

Sir Simon Milton

“Dog excrement carries a parasite which can cause blindness in children. On this basis I suspect that a reasonable, well informed, member of the public would approve of covert surveillance necessary to reduce dog fouling in children’s playgrounds ...”

Sir Christopher Rose

“Dog fouling is at the top of resident’s list in terms of issues they want the council to be tackling on the ground, so I know the public are only too pleased to see us catching people,"

Jim Corey, Ch Exec, Wyre Council

Page 7: The Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 Implications for the Councils

Who is really watching you?

“Let's not get hysterical. There are far graver threats to our liberties than the man from the town hall”

The Guardian

Page 8: The Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 Implications for the Councils

RIPA Key messages

Necessary

Proportionate

Collateral Intrusion

RIPA is a complex and difficult piece of legislation.

“Lord Justice Mummery 2006”

Page 9: The Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 Implications for the Councils

Section 27 RIPA – key messages

An authorisation issued by an Authorising Officer under the Act will provide the lawful authority for a public authority to carry out surveillance.

Officers can only act in accordance with the terms set out in the authorisation

The Authorising Officer thus performs a quasi judicial role

The Authorising Officer is accountable for his actions if things go wrong

Page 10: The Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 Implications for the Councils

The role of elected members

Provide a point of challenge

Ask questions

Ask for reports

Look for outcomes

Page 11: The Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 Implications for the Councils

Dave Holland, Cardiff Council, [email protected]