the practical management of intracerebral hemorrhage associated with oral anticoagulant therapy
TRANSCRIPT
Reviews
The practical management of intracerebral hemorrhageassociated with oral anticoagulant therapy
Luca Masotti1�, Mario Di Napoli2, Daniel A. Godoy3, Daniela Rafanelli4,
Giancarlo Liumbruno5, Nicholas Koumpouros6, Giancarlo Landini7, Alessandro Pampana1,
Roberto Cappelli8, Daniela Poli9, and Domenico Prisco9
Oral anticoagulant-associated intracerebral hemorrhage is in-
creasing in incidence and is the most feared complication of
therapy with vitamin K1 antagonists. Anticoagulant-associated
intracerebral hemorrhage has a high risk of ongoing bleeding,
death, or disability. The most important aspect of clinical
management of anticoagulant-associated intracerebral hemor-
rhage is represented by urgent reversal of coagulopathy, de-
creasing as quickly as possible the international normalized
ratio to valuesr1.4, preferablyr1.2, together with life support
and surgical therapy, when indicated. Protocols for anticoagu-
lant-associated intracerebral hemorrhage emphasize the im-
mediate discontinuation of anticoagulant medication and the
immediate intravenous administration of vitamin K1 (mean
dose: 10–20 mg), and the use of prothrombin complex concen-
trates (variable doses calculated estimate circulating functional
prothrombin complex) or fresh-frozen plasma (15–30 ml/kg) or
recombinant activated factor VII (15–120lg/kg). Because of cost
and availability, there is limited randomized evidence compar-
ingdifferent reversal strategies thatsupportaspecific treatment
regimen. In this paper, we emphasize the growing importance
of anticoagulant-associated intracerebral hemorrhage and de-
scribe options for acute coagulopathy reversal in this setting.
Additionally, emphasis is placed on understanding current con-
sensus-based guidelines for coagulopathy reversal and the
challenges of determining best evidence for these treatments.
On the basis of the available knowledge, inappropriate adher-
ence to current consensus-based guidelines for coagulopathy
reversal may expose the physician to medico-legal implications.
Key words: adverse affects, factor VII, fresh-frozen plasma,
intracerebral hemorrhage, prothrombin complex concentrate,
treatment, vitamin K antagonists, warfarin
Introduction
Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) are a class of anticoagulants that
represent one of the main classes of drugs used in cardiovas-
cular medicine; 1–1�5% of the population in western countries
have been the subject of VKA or so-called oral anticoagulant
therapy (OAT) (1), with widespread use over the past two
decades (2, 3). However, clinical practitioners resist using OAT
(4, 5), especially in elderly patients, due to their difficult
management and the risk of severe bleeding complications
(6). Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) represents the most
serious and feared complication of VKA.
This review is focused on the therapeutic strategies used to
reverse coagulopathy in patients who develop acute nontrau-
matic ICH while on OAT.
Physicians should embrace new practices:
� reverse the coagulopathy as soon as possible to avoid further
hematoma growth
� treat the initial underlying cause of ICH independently to
the treatment of the coagulopathy
� treat small hemorrhage sizes aggressively and quickly be-
cause patients with a better prognosis could worsen with
hematoma expansion, and
� revert anticoagulation in patients with a therapeutic inter-
national normalized ratio (INR), and not necessarily with a
major level of INR (Table 1).
Basic principles in VKA therapy
The available VKA are represented by warfarin, acenocou-
marol, and phenprocoumon, which differ for the differentDOI: 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2011.00595.x
Conflict of Interest: None declared.
Correspondence: Luca Masotti�, UO Medicina Interna Ospedale di
Cecina, Via Montanara, Localita Ladronaia, 57023, Cecina (Li), Italy.
E-mail: [email protected] Medicine, Cecina Hospital, Cecina, Italy2Neurological Service, San Camillo de’ Lellis General Hospital, Rieti, Italy3Neurointensive Care Unit, Sanatorio Pasteur, Catamarca, Argentina4Transfusion Medicine, Pistoia Hospital, Pistoia, Italy5Transfusion Medicine and Clinical Pathology, San Giovanni Calibita
Fatebenefratelli Hospital, Rome, Italy6Neurosurgery, S.S. Filippo e Nicola Hospital, Avezzano, Italy7Internal Medicine, Santa Maria Nuova Florence Hospital, Florence, Italy8Thrombosis Center, University of Siena, Siena, Italy9Department of Medical and Surgical Critical Care, University of Florence,
Thrombosis Center, Florence, Italy
& 2011 The Authors.International Journal of Stroke & 2011 World Stroke Organization Vol 6, June 2011, 228–240228
plasma half-life. VKA drugs act on the liver by inhibiting g-
carboxylation of glutamate residues on the N-terminal regions
of vitamin K-dependent coagulation factors (factor II, VII, IX,
and X) (6) (Fig. 1).
The main indicators for OATare represented by prophylaxis
in patients with cardioembolic sources, primary or secondary
prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism, and thromboem-
bolic prophylaxis in patients with prothrombotic syndromes
(7–9). The efficacy and safety of OAT depends on the quality
control monitoring of the therapy. The bleeding complications
increase with increasing INR values. The risk of bleeding
doubles with each increment of one unit in the INR value.
INR44�5 represents the most significant risk factor for
bleeding in patients with OAT increasing bleeding risk by
about six times (7, 10) (Fig. 2).
Bleeds secondary to OAT are classified as either major or
minor (11). Bleeds are classified ‘major’ if it:
� occurs in critical organs, the brain, retro-peritoneum,
peritoneum, chest, spinal cord, joints, gastro-intestinal tract
� results in a hemorrhagic shock, a decrease of 2 g/dl in
hemoglobin levels, requires surgical or invasive maneuvers, or
� results in death.
The remaining bleeds are classified as ‘minor’ bleeds (11).
Bleeding complications can be reduced, and the accurate
selection of patients’ absolute and relative contraindications
for OAT, patient monitoring in an anticoagulation clinic
Intrinsic pathway
FXII FXIIa
FXI FXIa
FIX FIXa
FVIII FVIIIa FX FXa
Prothrombin (FII) Thrombin (FIIa)
FV FVa
Fibrin monomerFibrinogen
Fibrin multimer
Crosslinked fibrin
Extrinsic pathway
Tissue injury
FVIIa FVII
Fig. 1 Sites of action (red) of oral anticoagulants in the clotting cascade.
Table 1 The NIKE principles in the reversal of anticoagulant-associated intracerebral hemorrhage
N 5 Normalize Normalize INR (and other coagulation parameters) as soon as possible
I 5 Immediate All patients should have immediate coagulopathy reversal, even if hemorrhage is small and clinical condition is good
K 5 Vitamin K1 Initial correction must include longer-acting agents (e.g. vitamin K1) to avoid rebound INR elevation later.
E 5 Elevation of INR Level of INR elevation does not influence timing of reversal. All levels of INR elevation (modest o2�0, therapeutic 2�0–3�0,
supratherapeutic 43�0) require urgent correction
INR, international normalized ratio.
0
2
4
6
8
10
1.9-2.0 2.4-2.7 3.1-3.4 3.7-4.3 4.9-5.7 6.6-8.0Estimated International Normalized Risk (INR) values
Od
ds
Rat
io f
or
intr
acra
nia
lb
leed
ing
ris
k
Fig. 2 Risk of intracerebral hemorrhage in outpatients according to INR levels. INR, international normalized ratio.
& 2011 The Authors.International Journal of Stroke & 2011 World Stroke Organization Vol 6, June 2011, 228–240 229
L. Masotti et al. Reviews
(specifically designed for monitoring OAT patients), together
with the self OAT monitoring (6), have contributed (12).
The risk factors for bleeds in patients with OAT are as
follows:
� advanced age
� severe liver and kidney diseases
� severe thrombocytopenia
� history of previous bleeding
� anemia
� dementia, and
� risk of falls (6).
Some genetic polymorphisms for enzymes involved in the
metabolism of VKA drugs, such as hepatic cytochrome P450
(CYP2C9�2 and CYP2C9�3) and enzyme vitamin K epoxide
reductase complex sub unit 1 (VKORC1), represent adjunctive
risk factors, identifying patients who require small doses of
VKA to reach the therapeutic range (13, 14).
Practical scores may help in identifying the bleeds risk of
each patient on OAT.
The Outpatients Bleeding Risk Index considers four inde-
pendent predictors of bleeding:
� age 465 years
� prior stroke
� prior gastrointestinal bleeding, and
� any of four comorbidities (recent myocardial infarction,
anemia, diabetes, or renal insufficiency) (15).
The most recent HEMORR2HAGES score, which includes
genetic polymorphisms, is shown in Fig. 3a and b (16).
However, the current clinical usefulness of this one is poor
and routine use might not significantly change the choice of
OAT in elderly patients (17).
Optimal anticoagulation with VKA is clinically challenging
because of various patient food and drug interactions. Fluc-
tuations in dietary vitamin K intake can have a significant
effect on the degree of anticoagulation in patients treated with
VKA. The interactions with many drugs (azole antibiotics,
macrolides, quinolones, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory
drugs, including selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors, selec-
tive serotonin reuptake inhibitors, omeprazole, lipid-lowering
agents, amiodarone, and fluorouracil) suggest that coadmi-
nistration with VKA should be avoided or at least closely
monitored (18). In addition, an increase of patient use of
various dietary herbal products and supplements can
lead to undesired outcomes on anticoagulant levels of
warfarin (19), increasing bleeds risk (20). Case reports have
described an association between their use and ICH due to a
possible antiplatelet effect and VKA potentiate (21, 22).
Because this information is not from human research trials,
it is prudent to avoid the use of herbal agents in patients
who are taking VKA medications and patients and health
care providers should be vigilant of potential herb–drug
interactions (23).
VKA and intracerebral hemorrhagic risk
The OAT-associated ICH (OAT-ICH) represents major bleed-
ing, resulting in a life-threatening condition, sometimes fatal.
The risk of OAT-ICH is of 0�2–0�6% per year of treatment (24,
25). The individual patient cumulative risk of bleeding is
directly related to the length of OAT. Higher frequencies of
bleeding are reported early in the course of therapy; the
frequency of major bleeding decreased from 3�0% during
the first month of outpatient OAT therapy to 0�8%/months
during the rest of the first year of therapy and to 0�3%/months
thereafter (26). Approximately 70% of OAT-ICH are intracer-
ebral, whereas 30% are in the subarachnoid space. The
OAT-ICH represent about 15% of all ICH, with incidence
estimated in the general population of about 1�8/100 000 in-
habitants/year and 8000–10 000 new cases expected every year
in the United States (25, 27, 28). As the use of VKA has
» Points
• 1 Liver disease
Renal disease• 1
• 1Alcoholism
• 1Cancer
• 1 Age > 75 yeras
• Platelets count < 75000/mm 3 1
• Concomitant antiplatelets treatment 1
• 1Previous bleeding
• Uncontrolled arterial blood hypertension 1
• Haemotocrit < 30% 1
• CYP2C9*2 or CYP2C9*3 presence 1
• High risk of falls or cognitiveimpairment 1
• 1Previous stroke
(a) (b)
Fig. 3 (a) The HEMORR2HAGES score. (b) Annual risk of hemorrhage according to HAEMORR2HAGES score.
& 2011 The Authors.International Journal of Stroke & 2011 World Stroke Organization Vol 6, June 2011, 228–240230
Reviews L. Masotti et al.
increased, so has the incidence of OAT-ICH. In fact, VKA may
be associated with as many as 17% of ICH cases, up from
5% 20 years ago (29). The most important OAT-ICH incidence
increase has been seen in patients aged more than 80 years,
ranging from 2�5% in 1988 to 45�9% in 1999 (29). The
risk of ICH increases significantly when OAT is combined
with other antithrombotic therapy (acetyl salicylic acid, ticlo-
pidine, clopidogrel, unfractioned, or low-molecular-weight
heparin) (6).
Although in many cases OAT-ICH occurs in patients with a
VKA overdose demonstrated by an outrange INR value, ICH
can also occur in conditions of INR values within the
therapeutic range. A recent case–control study shows that
only 6% of patients with OAT-ICH were excessively antic-
oagulated before the bleed, demonstrating that OAT use is
associated with an increasing risk of ICH despite appropriate
INR monitoring (30). Figure 4 shows an example of ICH in a
patient with INR in the normal range.
Triggering factors for an OAT-ICH in well-anticoagulated
patients are:
� uncontrolled arterial hypertension
� head trauma
� rupture of an unknown intracranial aneurysm or an arter-
ial-venous malformation
� leukoaraiosis
� amyloid microangiopathy
� primary or metastatic cerebral tumors, and
� unmonitored concomitant occasional therapy leading to an
increase of INR (31).
Cerebral microbleeds (MB) are known to be indicative of
bleeding-prone microangiopathy and potential risk factors for
ICH (32, 33) with a close positional association between
• CT scan after 3 hours• NIHSS 22• Glasgow Coma Scale 7/15• INR 0.7
• The patient is transfered to NeurosurgicalDepartment for haemorrhage evacuation
• Brain CT scan at hospital arrival of a female, 76-years old, about 60 kg of weight, in OAT for atrialfibrillation (suggested INR therapeutic range 2.0-3.0, target 2.5)
• INR at hospital arrival 3.2• NIHSS 6• Clasgow Coma Scale 12/15• Treatment with PCC (Uman Complex®, Kedrion,
Castelvecchio Pascoli, Lucca, Italy)at dosage of 1500 UI in five minutes followed byraFVII (Novoseven®, NovoNordisk) at dosage of1.2mg in five minutes and vitamin K1 (Konakion®,Roche) at dosage of 20 mg in 250 cc of salinesolution in thirty minutes
(a) (b)
• Brain CT scan after 25 days• Brain CT scan after neurosurgicalhaemorrhage evacuation
(d)(c)
Fig. 4 Example of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage in patient on oral anticoagulant therapy. CT, computed tomography; INR, international normalized
ratio; PCC, prothrombin complex concentrate.
& 2011 The Authors.International Journal of Stroke & 2011 World Stroke Organization Vol 6, June 2011, 228–240 231
L. Masotti et al. Reviews
recurrent ICH and prior MB (34). Excessive MB in OAT
patients with ICH compared with other groups suggests that
MB increase the risk of OAT-ICH (35) and underlying MB are
independently associated with a higher incidence of OAT-ICH.
However, the risks and benefits of VKA medication in patients
with MB are not well defined (33).
Thirty-day acute mortality for OAT-ICH is high, ranging
from 12% to 60% (25, 36), and it is nearly doubled when
compared with nonanticoagulated patients (37). However,
hematoma volume and lower level of consciousness measured
by the Glasgow Coma Scale but not INR levels are major
determinants of a poor outcome in patients with OAT-ICH
(38, 39). Hematoma enlargement is a major determinant of a
poor prognosis in OAT-ICH. The OAT-ICH is associated with
a greater baseline median ICH volume, more hemorrhage
expansion, and greater mortality than spontaneous ICH (40).
Experimental ICH animal models demonstrate that hema-
toma volume increases drastically between two- and 24 h,
hematoma volume increases steadily with increasing of INR
values, and mortality is critically associated with hematoma
volume (41). Although, in OAT-ICH patients, initial hema-
toma volume seems not to be significantly different compared
with non-OAT-ICH until INR r3�0, it is larger in OAT-ICH
with INR higher than 3�0 (42–44). It has been demonstrated
that VKA-treated patients continue to bleed more often and
for a longer duration compared with non-OAT-ICH (37).
Approximately 50% of OAT-ICH patients present a secondary
volume expansion compared with 17% of non-OAT-ICH
patients (37).
The time factor represents the most important variable in
the OAT-ICH patient prognosis (45). Patients with suspected
or confirmed OAT-ICH should be treated as a medical
emergency. OAT reversal should start as soon as possible after
symptom onset to prevent hematoma expansion (27). OAT
reversal, together with surgical treatment, and support thera-
pies such as reduction of blood hypertension and hemostatic
therapy represent the possible effective options to restrict
secondary hematoma expansion in OAT-ICH (46).
Practical management of OAT-ICH
Post OAT-ICH, it is possible and important to make an urgent
OAT reversal. Key measures to reverse OAT in patients with
OAT-ICH can be achieved through the immediate disconti-
nuation of OAT and three different pathways:
� direct competition by administering vitamin K1
� replacement of native coagulation factors by using fresh-
frozen plasma (FFP) or a prothrombin complex concentrate
(PCC), and
� by-passing the central part of the coagulation cascade
through the use of recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa)
(6, 47).
The goal of these therapeutic measures is to decrease the
INR values to levels r1�4, preferably r1�2 (6, 8, 25, 48–53).
The different pharmacological and blood product options
have specific characteristics related to ease of administration,
timing and duration of effect, and cost, which may potentially
influence the choice of their use. The specific options for OAT
reversal should be used complementary to general therapeutic
measures for ICH and life support (51).
Vitamin K1
The administration of vitamin K1 (phytomenadione) is the
first point of any warfarin reversal strategy. However, it has a
slow action onset, making it a poor choice as a single agent. To
effectively reverse the effect of warfarin, vitamin K1 usually
takes at least two- to six-hours, and frequently 12–24 h (6, 8,
25, 49, 50). The effect of vitamin K1 is more rapid when given
intravenously (IV) (53, 54). Vitamin K1 is inexpensive, but
anaphylaxis (three per 10 000 doses) from an IVadministration
has reduced its use (27, 54). Because of the short half-life and
duration of action of other OATreversal measures, vitamin K1
should be administered in all patients in order to avoid a
rebound in coagulopathy (10–20 mg in 250 ml of normal saline
in about 30 mins, infusion rate being 1 mg/min), with the aim
of inducing de novo hepatic synthesis of vitamin K-dependent
coagulation factors and of achieving the stabilization of OAT
reversal (6, 8, 25, 48–53). Subcutaneous and oral administra-
tions represent alternative routes because they do not carry the
same anaphylaxis risk as the IV route; however, the onset of
action is not as rapid or reliable, especially when neurological
status is compromised. Therefore, in OAT-ICH, the IV route is
preferred (6, 8, 25, 48–53).
PCC
Prothrombin complex concentrates represent a generic term
for several products that are derived from plasma and contain
factors II, VII, IX, and X in different concentrations. PCC is
considered the first therapeutic choice in OAT-ICH (6, 8, 25,
48–53, 55). Originally designed as factor IX concentrates, there
are at least 10 different PCC products that are available in
different parts of the world and contain varying levels of factors
II and X, and low levels of factor VII (56, 57). The most
widespread types of PCC generally contain three or four
vitamin K-dependent factors. Generally, PCC with three
factors do not contain factor VII. It has been suggested that
PCC containing three vitamin K-dependent coagulation fac-
tors could be less effective in reversal OAT, and thus, in some
situations, the addition of rFVIIa may be warranted (58).
However, in a prospective study, considering about 90 patients
with spontaneous and traumatic ICH, Imberti et al. (36)
reached the goal to obtain an INRr1�5 30 mins postadminis-
tration of a PCC containing three factors (factors II, IX, and X)
in 75% of patients, and maintained this benefit until 96 h after
administration in 98% of patients, with a very low 30-day
mortality (about 12%). A meta-analysis (n 5 460 patients) has
demonstrated the effectiveness of the PCC in determining the
rapid OAT reversal, the superiority of the PCC over the FFP
& 2011 The Authors.International Journal of Stroke & 2011 World Stroke Organization Vol 6, June 2011, 228–240232
Reviews L. Masotti et al.
and/or vitamin K1, reducing the times of OAT reversal, with-
out cases of disseminated intravascular coagulation and low
thrombotic risk (1�5%) (59).
The PCC are available as a concentrate, which can be
reconstituted to a total volume of about 50–150 ml and
delivered in 10–30 mins depending on the volume and rate
of infusion. The PCC infusion dose is dependent on body
weight; it is related to INR and is based on a dose of factor IX
necessary to reversal (56). For each international unit of
PCC per kg of body weight, the plasma concentration of factor
IX increases by 1% (60). Table 2 summarizes the recommended
dose of PCC to be infused in patients with OAT-ICH. Optimal
PCC dosing (INR-based vs. a standardized fixed dose) remains
somewhat controversial, although individualized dosing
may ensure INR correction more rapidly. PCC can correct
the INR within minutes (36). Thus, they are very good agents
for acute OATreversal because of the small volume, the range of
coagulation factors provided, and the rapid onset of action.
However, PCC are significantly more expensive than vitamin
K1 and FFP (6, 8, 25, 48–53, 55). When using PCC prepara-
tions with low amounts of factor VII, coadministration of
one- to two-units of FFP or rFVIIa may also be considered
(8, 50, 55).
FFP
Fresh-frozen plasma is the most common agent utilized in
OAT-ICH, especially in the United States, where 60% of
consumed FFP is used for OAT reversal (61). The FFP is a
blood product that contains all the coagulation factors. How-
ever, the actual levels of vitamin K-dependent clotting factors
in each unit of FFP are not standardized and may vary widely.
Table 3 shows the average content of individual coagulation
factors present in a single unit of FFP as reported by Blood
Transfusion Task Force of British Committee for Standards in
Haematology (62). Anyway, the ordinary FFP unit is inevitably
subject to the biological variability associated with a single
donor (63). Furthermore, the infusion of FFP has some risks.
In particular, it may be necessary to use large volumes of
plasma to correct the coagulation defect. Initial doses of 15 ml/
kg of FFP are suggested (6, 8, 25, 49, 50, 62), although there is
evidence that a dose of 30 ml/kg produces more complete
correction of coagulation factor levels (60, 64–67). Although
the required volume of FFP somewhat depends on the initial
INR, the target INR is the more relevant issue. According to a
recent study, the difference in the predicted FFP transfusion
volume between an INR goal of 1�3 and 1�7 is two-liters of
plasma at all initial INRs. This represents a significant patient
overload volume with potentially dangerous effects in the
elderly and cardio pulmonary disease patients (66). Further-
more, in these patients, the infusion rate should not be too
quick and this can lead to delays in OAT reversal. The FFP
Table 2 How to choose the dose of PCC or FFP for urgent warfarin
reversal: calculated or fixed dose
INR value Estimated functional PC
Calculated dose
First step: Convert INR to % of estimated circulating functional
prothrombin complex (PC)
Z5 5%
4�0–4�9 10%
2�6–3�2 15%
2�2–2�5 20%
1�9–2�1 25%
1�7–1�8 30%
1�4–1�6 40%
1�0–1�3 100%
Second step
Calculate the dose:
IU of PCC or ml of FFP needed to be infused 5 (Target in % of PC to be
reached–current estimated % of PC)� kg of body weight
Example:
Present INR 4�5 corresponding to estimated functional PC 10%
Target INR 1�4 corresponding to estimated functional PC 40%
Body Weight 70 kg
IU needed to be infused 5 (40–10)� 70 5 2100 IU of PCC or 2800 ml
of FFP
INR value PCC dose (IUkg) FFP dose (ml/kg)
Fixed dose
1�5–2�0 20 15
2�0–4�0 30–40 15–30
Z4�0 50 15–30
Example:
Present INR 4�5Body weight 70 kg
IU needed to be infused 5 3500 IU of PCC or 1050–2100 ml of FFP
Adapted from Aguilar et al. (25).INR, international normalized ratio;
PCC, prothrombin complex concentrate; FFP,fresh-frozen plasma.
Table 3 Average composition of 250–300 ml of fresh-frozen plasma
after thawing at 41C
Levels after
thawing (41C)
Levels
after 24 h
Levels after
five days
Fibrinogen 260–270 mg/dl 220–230 mg/dl 220–230 mg/dl
Factor II 80 IU 80 IU 80 IU
Factor V 80 IU 75 IU 65 IU
Factor VII 90 IU 80 IU 70 IU
Factor VIII 90 IU 50 IU 40 IU
Factor IX 100 IU / /
Factor X 85 IU 85 IU 80 IU
Factor XI 100 IU / /
Factor XII 80 IU / /
Factor XIII 100 IU / /
Antithrombin 100 IU / /
Von Willebrand
factor
80 IU / /
Adapted from British Committee for Standards in Hematology, Blood
Transfusion Task Force (62).
& 2011 The Authors.International Journal of Stroke & 2011 World Stroke Organization Vol 6, June 2011, 228–240 233
L. Masotti et al. Reviews
requires compatibility testing and thawing before administra-
tion; there is an inherent delay in initiating FFP transfusion
(62, 67). Thanks to the introduction of several preventive
measures, the residual risk for the three major viral infections
(i.e., hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus, HIV/AIDS) is cur-
rently very low (68). Anyway, other equally life-threatening
risks of FFP transfusion are far more common, such as severe
allergic reactions (69), transfusion-associated circulatory over-
load (70), and transfusion-related acute lung injury (71).
Because of these considerations, FFP should be used in the
OAT- ICH if PCC is not available (60).
rFVIIa
Recombinant activated factor VII is an approved medication
for the treatment of hemophilia.
Randomized clinical trials (RCT) have evaluated the benefit
of avoiding enlargement of hematoma in the acute phase of
spontaneous noncoagulopathic ICH and using off-label for
VKA-related ICH as well as traumatic hemorrhage (72–75).
The rFVIIa promotes hemostasis at sites of vascular rupture,
limiting hematoma enlargement after ICH. Preliminary results
have shown a reduction in hematoma volume increase,
mortality, and better functional status after a three-month
administration of rFVIIa, despite a 5% increase in arterial
thromboembolic phenomena (76). The phase III FAST trial
showed no significant difference in mortality or severe dis-
ability at 90 days between different dosages of rFVIIa and
placebo, but confirmed the hemostatic effect and thromboem-
bolic complications (77). In conclusion, the use of rFVIIa
reduces the growth of the hematoma but does not improve
patient survival or functional outcome after ICH; in addition,
rFVIIa increases the incidence of arterial thromboembolic
complications (78). On the basis of these results, routine
utilization of rFVIIa as ultra-early hemostatic therapy for all
patients with ICH cannot be recommended. However, the use
of rFVIIa in conjunction with FFP is associated with shortened
times to correction of INR and reduced the total dose of FFP
required for the correction of coagulopathy in OAT-ICH
patients (79).
As with PCC, rFVIIa has the advantage of limited volume
infusions; even low doses of rFVIIa correct prothrombin time.
INR values cannot be used as a reliable indicator of cessation of
bleeding in patients who have received rFVIIa. A single IV dose
can normalize the INR within minutes; however, it is very
important to keep in mind that INR might increase in
subsequent hours due to the short-half-life of rFVIIa, and
therefore, the drug infusion requires strict follow-up and
monitoring (80). It is not known whether other emerging
coagulation tests such as thromboelastography might be
useful. The dose of rFVIIa for OAT-ICH is not standardized
and optimal dosing is not known. The rFVIIa is administered
as a single, one-time bolus over two- to five-minutes ranging
from 15 to 120mg/kg (mean dose 80–90 mg/kg) (25, 27). Large
doses are associated with a longer duration of effect (81).
Until now, rFVIIa has not been a recognized for the
treatment of OAT-associated bleeding and therefore its use in
these situations is considered off-label (81, 82), even though
suggested by the 2008 American College of Chest Physicians
Guidelines on Antithrombotic Therapy as an alternative to
PCC or FFP with a grade of recommendation IC (6). Among all
the current warfarin-reversal options, rFVIIa, however, is the
most expensive.
Whatever measures are chosen, the INR should be checked
at the end of the infusion, and then every three-hours when the
INR is corrected to confirm its stability. If INR monitoring
reveals a value Z1�5, an additional dose of reversal therapy
should be administered (6, 8, 50, 55). Table 4 summarizes the
advantages and limitations of each measure of OAT reversal.
The role and timing of surgery in OAT-ICHWhen reaching the goal of OATreversal, neurosurgical evacua-
tion of the hematoma should be warranted when indicated
(51, 52, 83). Figure 4 (c,d) shows an example of neurosurgical
hematoma evacuation after OATreversal. Given the absence of
strong scientific evidence to indicate a prominent role of
Table 4 Options for urgent warfarin reversal
Agent Pros Cons
Usefulness for
urgent reversal
Vitamin K1 Widely available; inexpensive; directly reverses
warfarin effect; small volume infused; low infec-
tive and thrombotic risk
Slow onset of action; possible allergy Poor
Fresh-frozen plasma Widely available; contains all coagulation factors;
low thrombotic risk
Large volumes usually needed; requires cross-
matching and thawing; slow onset of action; not
negligible infective risk, possible TRALI
Fair
Prothrombin complex
concentrate
Rapid onset; small volume infused; low infective
risk
Expensive; variable factor concentrations in differ-
ent preparations; not negligible thrombotic risk
Good
Recombinant activated
factor VII
Rapid onset; small volume infused; thrombin
burst; low infective risk
Very expensive; acts directly on only a single factor;
INR correction may be ‘lab artifact’; off label use
Good
TRALI, transfusion acute lung injury.
& 2011 The Authors.International Journal of Stroke & 2011 World Stroke Organization Vol 6, June 2011, 228–240234
Reviews L. Masotti et al.
surgery in determining the outcome, this measure should be
performed in a tailored manner. With the exceptions of the
placement of a ventricular drain in patients with hydrocepha-
lus and evacuation of a large posterior fossa hematoma, the
timing and nature of other neurosurgical interventions is also
controversial. In practice, surgery is performed as a life-saving
measure in patients with large hematomas or cortical hemor-
rhages and secondary neurologic deterioration. American and
European guidelines recommend surgery for patients with
lobar supratentorial hemorrhages within 1 cm of the cortical
surface, particularly for those with good neurological status
who are deteriorating clinically. For patients with profound
sited hemorrhages (basal ganglia, thalamic) and mass effect,
guidelines suggest evacuation with minimally invasive meth-
ods within 12 h (51, 52). Urgent surgical removal of infra-
tentorial hematomas larger than 3 cm is frequently associated
with remarkable recoveries. There is substantial evidence that
the management of patients with ICH in a neurointensive care
unit, where treatment is directed toward monitoring and
managing cardiorespiratory variables and intracranial pres-
sure, is associated with improved outcomes. Attention must be
paid to fluid and glycemic management, minimizing the risk of
ventilator-acquired pneumonia, fever control, provision of
enteral nutrition, and thromboembolic prophylaxis.
There is a robust theoretical basis supporting early surgery.
An aggressive management in the acute phase can be translated
into improved outcomes after ICH (84). Specific treatment
approaches include early diagnosis and hemostasis, aggressive
management of blood pressure, open surgical and minimally
invasive surgical techniques to remove clot, techniques to
remove intraventricular blood, and management of intracra-
nial pressure (84). The OAT-ICH may produce a great volume
hematoma with mass effect, edema, obstructive hydrocepha-
lus, midline shift, intracranial hypertension, herniations, and
death; thus, surgery is a therapeutic possibility. Surgical
evacuation may prevent hematoma expansion, decrease in-
tracranial pressure, mass effect, and prevent the release of
neurotoxic products. Despite these hypothetical benefits,
surgery remains controversial, without a clear demonstra-
tion of efficacy when compared with standard medical therapy
(83, 85).
Most surgeons follow guidelines for clot removal similar to
those applied for spontaneous hematomas of nonanticoagu-
lated patients (51), although the analysis of available clinical
data suggests that patient subgroups that mostly benefit from
surgery are different from anticoagulated patients. The litera-
ture lacks evidence on the effect of early surgery in antic-
oagulated and rapidly worsening patients because most studies
on the surgical evacuation of ICH have considered patients
already treated for correction of INR (83, 86). A study
performed at the Mayo Clinic suggests that emergency evacua-
tion for deteriorating patients with large OAT-ICH is compa-
tible with a favorable outcome independent of anticoagulation
reversal (87). Time shortening of OAT reversal is crucial both
for spontaneous and for posttraumatic ICH to be submitted to
neurosurgery evacuation (88). Ultra-rapid reversal of antic-
oagulation could reduce the time to biological and surgical
hemostasis, and might improve outcome (89). In this case,
neurosurgery could be performed immediately with results
comparable to those of nonanticoagulated patients. However,
guidelines note than there is evidence that ultra-early surgery
(within four-hours) is associated with an increased risk of
rebleeding and higher mortality (475%) (90). Future rando-
mized studies should aim to individuate with higher accuracy
patients who certainly may benefit from surgical treatment.
Furthermore, the role of surgery in OAT-ICH should be
reevaluated in the light of recent technological advances.
Minimally invasive techniques may allow a more efficient
and less traumatic evacuation of the hematoma (91, 92).
Current evidence: benefits, concerns,and challenges
Currently, there are no prospective, randomized, controlled
clinical trials comparing the various VKA-reversal strategies.
There are no controlled trials assessing whether or not PCC or
rFVIIa are superior to a strategy of FFP and vitamin K1, or
comparing PCC and rFVIIa regarding clinical outcome. How-
ever, several small retrospective and prospective studies eval-
uated the effectiveness of INR reversal obtained with the
various agents (44, 74, 93, 94). In summary, they show that a
reversal of INR within two-hours from hospital admission is
associated with low rates of hematoma enlargement and is
achieved in the majority of patients (84%) treated with PCC,
while FFP infusions show only a partial effect in reducing
hematoma enlargement (39%) and vitamin K1 has no effects
(93). In patients with ICH-related coagulopathies of different
etiologies who need neurosurgical interventions, the reversal
of INR before surgery attempted with FFP and rFVIIa is
quicker (mean seven-hours), without thrombotic complica-
tions, with a better functional outcome (95). The beneficial
effect after the reversal of anticoagulation using different
agents is also evident in patients with acute clinical worsening
and a marked mass effect who have emergency surgical
evacuation of hematomas (87). These studies show that there
is limited evidence to support a specific treatment regimen for
VKA-related ICH. Randomized trials using patient mortality
and neurological function as outcomes have been proposed.
However, they do not appear to be easy to carry out due to the
large sample size required, the frequent poor outcome of OAT-
ICH patients, and variability in available products in different
areas of the world. Thus, current approaches derive more from
consensus-based guidelines driven from concern for rapid and
safe coagulopathy correction.
The risk of thrombotic events after OATreversal is a problem
that has affected this type of treatment strategy in patients with
acute OAT-associated bleeding for a long time, although the
percentages of thrombosis are variable on the basis of the
different OATreversal treatments used, ranging from 0% to 7%
(25). In many cases, physicians do not have alternative choices
& 2011 The Authors.International Journal of Stroke & 2011 World Stroke Organization Vol 6, June 2011, 228–240 235
L. Masotti et al. Reviews
to reverse OAT adverse effects, particularly if hemorrhage is
severe enough to endanger the life of the patient. Goldstein
and colleagues have shown that the 30-day incidence of
arterial and venous thromboembolic events is about 5% for
patients with OAT-ICH in which OAT is discontinued,
lower than that reported in patients with non-OAT-
ICH (7�2%) (96), whereas Imberti et al. (36) did not
observe thrombotic complications during hospitalization of
OAT-ICH treated with PCC. However, thrombotic events in
the acute phase of OAT-ICH seem not to influence 30-day
mortality (96). Mechanical prophylaxis should be pre-
scribed to patients with OAT-ICH to prevent venous throm-
boembolism (97).
The time for OAT should be restarted after an ICH is an
important question. For each patient, the balance between the
thrombotic risk due to the coexistent thromboembolic disease
for which OAT was prescribed and the risk of bleeding
recurrence should be carefully evaluated.
A case–control study enrolling approximately 50 patients
compared a group of patients in which OAT was restarted
after ICH with one in which OAT was not restarted, and
showed that the risk of ICH recurrences could be low in
those who restarted therapy, whereas the incidence of throm-
botic events could not be negligible in those who did not
restart OAT (98). A very recent review of clinical studies and
case series by Romualdi et al. (99) has demonstrated an
incidence of 2�9% of ICH recurrence after restarting OAT in
patients with prosthetic heart valves suffering from a first
episode of ICH. It is suggested by experts to restart OAT
therapy in patients with prosthetic mechanical heart valves, in
most cases one-week from the hemorrhagic event, while
some concerns exist in restarting OAT in nonvalvular atrial
fibrillation (25).
In patients after OAT-associated major bleeding,
ACCP guidelines suggest the possibility of reducing OAT
intensity, for example prescribing a range of INR between
2�0 and 2�5 in prosthetic mechanical heart valves and
between 1�5 and 2�0 in patients with atrial fibrillation together
with a close monitoring of INR to avoid the risk of overdose
(6) or to replace mechanical with bioprosthetic valves in
selected patients (6). For OAT-ICH in patients with venous
thromboembolism, caval filters’ placement is indicated
to prevent a first episode or a recurrence of pulmonary
embolism (100).
Treatment algorithms and guidelines
Despite the lack of evidence from RCT, there are several
international consensus-based guidelines that address the
treatment regimen in OAT-ICH patients (6, 11, 50–52, 55).
All guidelines emphasize the high morbidity of OAT-ICH,
the urgency of rapid reversal of coagulopathy, the use of
vitamin K1 (usually IV), and the use of PCC, given the rapid
onset of action with these agents and the shortcomings of
FFP alone. However, none provides a specific target INR
for an adequate reversal and the lack of clear evidence
limits the ability to make strong recommendations about the
agent and the dose to be used. Any intracranial bleeding
in a patient on VKA, independent of INR levels when
Z1�5, should be considered as a life-threatening condition
regardless of the hematoma size or the patient’s clinical status
at the first evaluation, because of the high risk of ongoing
hemorrhage, the high fatality rate, and the residual severe
disability from OAT-ICH (Fig. 5). The main recommendations
are summarized in Table 5.
Fig. 5 Proposed algorithm for Hyperacute VKA reversal. CT, computed tomography; FFP, fresh-frozen plasma; INR, international normalized ratio; PCC,
prothrombin complex concentrate; OAT-ICH, oral anticoagulant-associated intracerebral hemorrhage; rFVIIa, recombinant activated factor VII; VKA, vitamin
K antagonist.
& 2011 The Authors.International Journal of Stroke & 2011 World Stroke Organization Vol 6, June 2011, 228–240236
Reviews L. Masotti et al.
Conclusion
The incidence of OAT-ICH has increased recently because it is
associated with a high risk of ongoing bleeding, death, or
disability. Urgent reversal of coagulopathy is the highest
priority. Several agents such as vitamin K1, PCC, rFVIIa,
and/or FFP are available, and there are pros and cons in the
use of each of them. They should be included in the qualifica-
tion of every physician who might have to treat a patient
receiving such therapy. The incorrect or the late management
of therapeutic measures for OAT reversal in the case of ICH
may expose the physician to the risk of legal prosecution,
because effective and safe antidotes are available (101). There-
fore, it is not acceptable that the reversal of OAT is delayed or
incomplete or even omitted. A call for action is needed to
develop a uniform approach for physicians in the management
of patients on OAT, and it is particularly desirable that each
hospital is equipped with internal protocols derived from
recognized guidelines (Fig. 5).
All protocols for OAT-ICH emphasize the immediate cessa-
tion of the anticoagulant medication and the immediate
administration of vitamin K1 (IV). The use of PCC or rFVIIa
may reverse coagulopathy more rapidly than FFP alone;
however, randomized trials testing this are yet to be initiated.
Furthermore, the cost and availability of these agents may limit
their widespread use. In the near future, new oral antithrom-
botic drugs will be used (and will possibly replace VKAs) for
the prophylaxis and treatment of arterial and venous throm-
boembolic disease. Among these, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and
apixaban are the most studied and have already been shown to
be effective and safe (102–105). After the recent Phase III trial
RE-LY (randomized evaluation of long-term anticoagulation
therapy), the use of dabigatran in atrial fibrillation is more
clearly defined. The results show that the 110-mg dose of
dabigatran was associated with similar rates of stroke and
systemic embolism (primary end points) and lower rates of
major hemorrhage when compared with warfarin; the 150 mg
dose of dabigatran was associated with lower rates of stroke
and systemic embolism but with a similar rate of major
hemorrhage (106).
However, among the main limitations of these new drugs,
the absence of a specific antidote in bleeding complications
could influence their use in clinical practice. Whatever the
antidotes tested for the treatment of the new antithrombotic,
drug-related bleedings consist of PCC, FFP, and rFVIIa;
hence, their knowledge could also be useful for this new
scenario (107, 108).
References
1 Salamat A, Seaton J, Watson HG. Impact of introducing guidelines on
anticoagulant reversal. Transfus Med 2005; 15:99–105.
2 Go AS, Hylek EM, Phillips KA et al. Prevalence of diagnosed atrial
fibrillation in adults; national implications for rhythm management
and stroke prevention: the AnTicoagulation and Risk Factors in Atrial
fibrillation (ATRIA) Study. JAMA 2001; 285:2370–5.
3 Robert-Ebadi E, Le Gal G, Righini M. Use of anti-coagulants in
elderly patients: practical recommendations. Clin Interv Aging 2009;
4:165–77.
4 Pisters R, de Vos CB, Nieuwlaat R, Crijns HJ. Use and underuse of oral
anticoagulation for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: old and
new paradigms. Semin Thromb Hemost 2009; 35:554–9.
5 Wittkowsky AK. Effective anticoagulation therapy: defining the gap
between clinical studies and clinical practice. Am J Manag Care 2004;
10(Suppl.): S297–306.
6 Ansell J, Hirsh J, American College of Chest Physicians et al. Pharma-
cology and management of the vitamin K antagonists: American
College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guide-
lines (8th edition). Chest 2008; 133:160S–98S.
7 Schulman S, Beyth RJ, Kearon C, Levine MN, American College of
Chest Physicians. Hemorrhagic complication of anticoagulant and
thrombolytic treatment: American College of Chest Physicians
evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (8th edition). Chest
2008; 133:257S–98S.
8 Federation of Centers for the Diagnosis of Thrombosis and Surveil-
lance of Antithrombotic Therapies (FCSA). Guide to oral anticoagu-
lant therapy. Recommendations. Edition 2009. http://www.fcsa.it
9 Baglin TP, Keeling DM, Watson HG, for the British Committe
for Standards in Hematology. Guidelines on oral anticoagula-
tion (warfarin): third edition-2005 update. Br J Hematol 2006; 132:
277–85.
Table 5 Summary of recommendations for oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT) reversal from the main International Scientific Societies
Scientific Society
First choice (always in association
with intravenous vitamin K1) Second choice Levels of evidence
Grade of
recommendation
AHA (51) PCC or FFP / IIa B
ACCP (6) PCC or FFP or rFVIIa / I C
BSH (9) PCC FFP III B
ASTH (50) PCC1FFP / Expert consensus /
ESO (52) PCC FFP IV /
FCSA (8) PCC FFP Expert consensus /
SIMTI (55) PCC FFP II C1
PCC, prothrombin complex concentrate; FFP, fresh-frozen plasma; AHA, American Heart Association; ACCP, American College of Chest Physician;
BSH, British Society of Hematology; ASTH, Australasian Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis; ESO, European Stroke Organization; FCSA,
Federation of Centers for the Diagnosis of Thrombosis and Surveillance of Antithrombotic Therapies; SIMTI, Italian Society of Transfusion
Medicine.
& 2011 The Authors.International Journal of Stroke & 2011 World Stroke Organization Vol 6, June 2011, 228–240 237
L. Masotti et al. Reviews
10 Hylek EM, Singer DE. Risk factor for intracranial hemorrhage in
outpatients taking warfarin. Ann Intern Med 1994; 120:897–902.
11 Schulman S, Kearon C, on behalf of the SubCommittee on Control of
the Anticoagulation of the Scientific,Standardization Committee of
the Intrnational Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis. Definition
of major bleeding in clinical investigations of antihemostatic medic-
inal products in non-surgical patients. J Thromb Haemost 2005;
3:692–4.
12 Chiquette E, Amato MG, Bussey HI. Comparison of an anticoagula-
tion clinic with usual medical care: anticoagulation control,
patient outcomes, and health care costs. Arch Intern Med 1998; 158:
1641–7.
13 Gage BF. Pharmacogenetics-based coumarin therapy. Hematol Am
Soc Hematol Educ Program 2006: 467–73.
14 International Warfarin Pharmacogenetics Consortium. Estimation of
the warfarin dose with clinical and pharmacogenetic data. N Engl J
Med 2009; 360:753–64.
15 Beyth RJ, Quinn LM, Landefeld CS. Prospective evaluation of an
index for predicting risk of major bleeding in outpatients treated with
warfarin. Am J Med 1998; 105:91–9.
16 Gage BF, Yan Y, Milligan PE et al. Clinical classification schemes for
predicting hemorrhage: results from the National Registry of Atrial
Fibrillation (NRAF). Am Heart J 2006; 151:713–9.
17 Somme D, Corvol A, Lazarovici C, Lahjibi-Paulet H, Gisselbrecht M,
Saint-Jean O. Clinical usefulness in geriatrics patients of combining
the CHADS2 and HEMORR2HAGES scores for guiding antithrom-
botic prophylaxis in atrial fibrillation. A preliminary study. Aging Clin
Exp Res 2010; 22:289–94.
18 Holbrook AM, Pereira JA, Labiris R et al. Systematic overview of
warfarin and its drug and food interactions. Arch Intern Med 2005;
165:1095–106.
19 Nutescu EA, Shapiro NL, Ibrahim S, West P. Warfarin and its
interactions with food, herbs and other dietary supplements. Expert
Opin Drug Safe 2006; 5:433–51.
20 Izzo AA, Di Carlo G, Borrelli F, Emst E. Cardiovascular pharma-
cotherapy and herbal medicines: the risk of drug interactions. Int J
Cardiol 2005; 98:1–14.
21 Wittkowsky AK. Dietary supplements, herbs and oral anticoagulants:
the nature of evidence. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2008; 25:72–7.
22 Samules N. Herbal remedies and anticoagulant therapy. Thromb
Haemost 2005; 93:3–7.
23 Ulbricht G, Chao W, Costa D, Rusie-Seamon E, Weissner W, Woods J.
Clinical evidence of herb-drug interactions: a systematic review by the
Natural Standard Research Collaboration. Curr Drug Metab 2008;
9:1063–120.
24 Linkins LA, Choi PT, Douketis JD. Clinical impact of bleeding in
patients taking oral anticoagulant therapy for venous thromboem-
bolism: a meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 2003; 139:893–900.
25 Aguilar MI, Hart RG, Kase CS et al. Treatment of warfarin-associated
intracerebral hemorrhage: literature review and expert opinion. Mayo
Clin Proc 2007; 82:82–92.
26 Levine MN, Raskob G, Landefeld S, Kearon C. Hemorrhagic com-
plications of anticoagulant treatment. Chest 2001; 119:108S–21S.
27 Steiner T, Rosand J, Diringer M. Intracerebral haemorrhage asso-
ciated with oral anticoagulant therapy. Current practice and unre-
solved questions. Stroke 2006; 17:256–62.
28 Appelboam R, Thomas EO. Warfarin and intracranial haemorrhage.
Blood Rev 2009; 23:1–9.
29 Flaherty ML, Kissela B, Woo D et al. The increasing incidence of oral
anticoagulant-associated intracerebral haemorrhage. Neurology 2007;
68:116–21.
30 Jeffrey RL, Gordon DH, Sivasubramaniam R, Chapman A. Warfarin
related intracranial haemorrhage: a case-controlled study on antic-
oagulation monitoring prior to spontaneous subdural or intracer-
ebral haemorrhage. J Clin Neurosc 2009; 16:882–5.
31 Marietta M, Pedrazzi P, Girardis M, Torelli G. Intracerebral haemor-
rhage: an often neglected medical emergency. Intern Emerg Med 2007;
2:38–45.
32 Greenberg SM, Vernooij MW, Cordonnier C et al. Cerebral micro-
bleeds: a guide to detection and interpretation. Lancet Neurol 2009;
8:165–74.
33 Lee SH, Ryu WS, Roh JK. Cerebral microbleeds are a risk factor
for warfarin-related intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurology 2009; 72:
171–6.
34 Sueda Y, Naka H, Ohtsuki T et al. Positional relationship between
recurrent intracerebral hemorrhage/lacunar infarction and pre-
viously detected microbleeds. Am J Neuroradiol 2010; 31:1498–503.
35 Lovelock CE, Cordonnier C, Naka H et al. Antitrombotic drug use,
cerebral microbleeds, and intracerebral hemorrhage: a systematic
review of published and unpublished studies. Stroke 2010; 41:1222–8.
36 Imberti D, Barillari G, Biasoli C et al. Prothrombin complex con-
centrates for urgent anticoagulation reversal in patients with intra-
cranial haemorrhage. Pathophysiol Haemost Thromb 2007-08; 36:
259–65.
37 Flibotte JJ, Hagan N, O’Donnell J, Greenberg SM, Rosand J. Warfarin,
hematoma expansion, and outcome of intracerebral hemorrhage.
Neurology 2004; 63:1059–64.
38 Zubkov AY, Mandrekar JN, Claassen DO, Manno EM, Wijdicks EF,
Rabinstein AA. Predictors of outcome in warfarin-related intracer-
ebral hemorrhage. Arch Neurol 2008; 65:1320–5.
39 Baldi G, Altomonte F, Altomonte M et al. Intracranial haemorrhage in
patients on antithrombotics: clinical presentation and determinants
of outcome in a prospective multicentric study in italian emergency
departments. Cerebrovasc Dis 2006; 22:286–93.
40 Cucchiara B, Messe S, Sansing L, Kasner S, Lyden P, for CHANT
Investigators. Hematoma growth in oral anticoagulant related in-
tracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke 2008; 39:2293–6.
41 Foerch C, Arai K, Jin G et al. Experimental model of warfarin-
associated intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke 2008; 39:3397–404.
42 Fric-Shamji EC, Shamji MF, Cole J, Benoit BG. Modifiable risk factors
for intracerebral hemorrhage: study of anticoagulated patients. Can
Fam Physician 2008; 54:1138–9.
43 Flaherty ML, Tao H, Haverbusch M et al. Warfarin use leads to larger
intracerebral hematomas. Neurology 2008; 71:1084–9.
44 Sheth KN, Cushing TA, Wendell L et al. Comparison of hematoma
shape and volume estimates in warfarin versus non-warfarin-related
intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurocrit Care 2010; 12:30–4.
45 Goldstein JN, Stephen HT, Frontiero V et al. Timing of fresh
frozen plasma administration and rapid correction of coagulopathy
in warfarin-related intracerebral haemorrhage. Stroke 2006; 37:
151–5.
46 Steiner T, Bosel J. Options to restrict hematoma expansion after
spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke 2010; 41:402–9.
47 Wiedermann CJ, Stockner I. Warfarin-induced bleeding complica-
tions-clinical presentation and therapeutic options. Thromb Res 2008;
122(Suppl. 2): 513–8.
48 Dentali F, Ageno W, Crowther M. Treatment of coumarin-associated
coagulopathy: a systematic review and proposed treatment algo-
rithms. J Thromb Haemost 2006; 4:1853–63.
49 Hanley JP. Warfarin reversal. J Clin Pathol 2004; 57:1132–9.
50 Baker RI, Coughlin PB, Gallus AS et al. Warfarin reversal: consensus
guidelines, on behalf of the Australasian Society of Thrombosis and
Haemostasis. MJA 2004; 181:492–7.
51 Morgenstern LB, Hemphill JC, Anderson C et al. Guidelines for the
management of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: a guideline
for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/
American Stroke Association. Stroke 2010; 41:2108–29.
52 Steiner T, Kaste M, Forsting M et al. Recommendations for the
management of intracranial haemorrhage – part I: spontaneous
intracerebral haemorrhage. The European Stroke Initiative Writing
& 2011 The Authors.International Journal of Stroke & 2011 World Stroke Organization Vol 6, June 2011, 228–240238
Reviews L. Masotti et al.
Committee and the Writing Committee for the EUSI Executive
Committee. Cerebrovasc Dis 2006; 22:294–316.
53 Ageno W, Garcia D, Aguilar MI et al. Prevention and treatment of
bleeding complications in patients receiving vitamin K antagonists,
Part 2 treatment. Am J Hematol 2009; 84:584–8.
54 Hanslik T, Prinseau J. The use of vitamin K in patients on anti-
coagulant therapy: a practical guide. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs 2004; 4:
43–55.
55 Liumbruno G, Bennardello F, Lattanzio A, Piccoli P, Rossetti G, as the
Italian Society of Transfusion Medicine and Immunohaematology
(SIMTI) Working Party. Recommendations for the use of antithrom-
bin concentrates and prothrombin complex concentrates. Blood
Transfus 2009; 7:325–34.
56 Schulman S, Bijsterveld NR. Anticoagulants and their reversal.
Transfus Med Rev 2007; 21:37–48.
57 Goldstein JN, Rosand J, Schwamm LH. Warfarin reversal in antic-
oagulant-associated intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurocrit Care 2008;
9:277–83.
58 Holland L, Warkentin TE, Refaai M, Crowther MA, Johnston MA,
Sarode R. Suboptimal effect of a three-factor prothrombin complex
concentrate (Profilnine-SD) in correcting supratherapeutic interna-
tional normalized ratio due to warfarin overdose. Transfusion 2009;
49:1171–7.
59 Leissinger CA, Blatt PM, Hoots WK, Ewenstein B. Role of prothrom-
bin complex concentrates in reversing warfarin anticoagulation: a
review of the literature. Am J Hematol 2008; 83:137–43.
60 Levi M, Toh CH, Thachil J, Watson HG.##Guidelines for the diagnosis
and management of disseminated intravascular coagulation. British
Committee for Standards in Haematology Br J Haematol 2009;
145:24–33.
61 Ozgonenel B, O’Malley B, Krishen P, Eisenbrey AB. Warfarin reversal
emerging as the major indication for fresch frozen plasma use at a
tertiary care hospital. Am J Hematol 2007; 82:1091–4.
62 British Committee for Standards in Hematology, Blood Transfusion
Task Force. Guidelines for the use of fresh-frozen plasma, cryopreci-
pitate and cryosupernatant. Br J Hematol 2004; 126:11–28.
63 Liumbruno GM, Sodini ML, Grazzini G, Tuscan Transfusion System.
Recommendations from the Tuscan Transfusion System on the
appropriate use of solvent/detergent-inactivated fresh-frozen plasma.
Blood Transfus 2008; 6:25–36.
64 Chowdhury P, Saayman AG, Paulus U et al. Efficacy of standard
dose and 30 ml/kg fresh frozen plasma in correcting laboratory
parameters of haemostasis in critically ill patients. Br J Haematol
2004; 125:69–73.
65 Santagostino E, Mancuso EM, Morfini M et al. Solvent/detergent
plasma for prevention of bleeding in recessively inherited coagulation
disorders: dosing, pharmacokinetics and clinical efficacy. Haemato-
logica 2006; 91:634–9.
66 Holland LL, Brooks JP. Toward rational fresh frozen plasma transfu-
sion. Am J Clin Pathol 2006; 126:133–9.
67 Liumbruno G, Bennardello F, Lattanzio A, Piccoli P, Rossetti G, Italian
Society of Transfusion Medicine and Immunohaematology (SIMTI)
Work Group. Recommendations for the transfusion of plasma and
platelets. Blood Transfus 2009; 7:132–50.
68 Velati C, Romano L, Fomiatti L, Baruffi L, Zanetti AR, SIMTI
Research Group. Impact of nucleic acid testing for hepatitis B virus,
hepatitis C virus, and human immunodeficiency virus on the safety of
blood supply in Italy: a 6-year survey. Transfusion 2008; 48:2205–13.
69 Domen RE, Hoeltge GA. Allergic transfusion reactions: an evaluation
of 273 consecutive reactions. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2003; 127:316–20.
70 Popovsky MA. Transfusion and the lung: circulatory overload and
acute lung injury. Vox Sang 2004; 87:62–5.
71 Silliman CC, Fung YL, Ball JB, Khan SY. Transfusion-related acute
lung injury (TRALI): current concepts and misconceptions. Blood Rev
2009; 23:245–55.
72 Freeman WD, Brott TG, Barrett KM et al. Recombinant factor VIIa for
rapid reversal of warfarin anticoagulation in acute intracranial
hemorrhage. Mayo Clin Proc 2004; 79:1495–500.
73 Ingerslev J, Vanek T, Culic S. Use of recombinant factor VIIa
for emergency reversal of anticoagulation. J Postgrad Med 2007; 53:
17–22.
74 Ilyas C, Beyer GM, Dutton RP, Scalea TM, Hess JR. Recombinant
factor VIIa for warfarin-associated intracranial bleeding. J Clin Anesth
2008; 20:276–9.
75 Stein DM, Dutton RP, Kramer ME, Scalea TM. Reversal of coagulo-
pathy in critically ill patients with traumatic brain injury: recombi-
nant factor VIIa is more cost-effective than plasma. J Trauma 2008;
66:63–72.
76 Mayer SA, Brun NC, Begtrup K et al. Recombinant activated
factor VII for acute intracerebral hemorrhage. N Eng J Med 2005; 352:
777–85.
77 Mayer SA, Brun NC, Begtrup K et al. Efficacy and safety of
recombinant activated factor VII for acute intracerebral hemorrhage.
N Engl J Med 2008; 358:2127–37.
78 Yuan ZH, Jiang JK, Huang WD, Pan J, Zhu JY, Wang JZ. A meta-
analysis of the efficacy and safety of recombinant activated factor VII
for patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage without hemophilia.
Clin Neurosci 2010; 17:685–93.
79 Brody DL, Aiyagari V, Shackleford AM, Diringer MN. Use of
recombinant factor VIIa in patients with warfarin-associated intra-
cranial hemorrhage. Neurocrit Care 2005; 2:263–7.
80 S^rensen B, Johansen P, Nielsen GL, S^rensen JC, Ingerslev J. Reversal
of the International Normalized Ratio with recombinant activated
factor VII in central nervous system bleeding during warfarin
thromboprophylaxis: clinical and biochemical aspects. Blood Coagul
Fibrinolysis 2003; 14:469–77.
81 Erhardtsen E, Nony P, Dechavanne M, Ffrench P, Boissel JP,
Hedner U. The effect of recombinant factor VIIa (NovoSeven) in
healthy volunteers receiving acenocoumarol to an International
Normalized Ratio above 2.0. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 1998; 9:
741–88.
82 Mallarkey G, Brighton T, Thomson A, Kaye K, Seale P, Gazarian M. An
evaluation of eptacog alfa in nonhaemophiliac conditions. Drugs
2008; 68:1665–89.
83 Mendelow AD, Gregson BA, Fernandes HM et al. Early surgery versus
initial conservative treatment in patients with spontaneous supra-
tentorial intracerebral haematomas in the International Surgical Trial
in Intracerebral Haemorrhage (STICH): a randomized trial. Lancet
2005; 365:387–97.
84 Elliott J, Smith M. The acute management of intracerebral hemor-
rhage: a clinical review. Anesth Analg 2010; 110:1419–27.
85 Teemstra OP, Evers SM, Kessels HG. Meta analyses in treatment of
spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral hematoma. Acta Neurochir
(Wien) 2006; 148:521–8.
86 Fernandes HM, Gregson B, Siddique S, Mendelow AD. Surgery in
intracerebral hemorrhage: the uncertainty continues. Stroke 2000;
31:2511–6.
87 Rabinstein AA, Wijdicks EFM. Determinants of outcome in antic-
oagulation-associated cerebral hematoma requiring emergency eva-
cuation. Arch Neurol 2007; 64:203–6.
88 Kalina M, Tinkoff G, Gbadebo A, Veneri P, Fulda G. A protocol for the
rapid normalization of INR in trauma patients with intracranial
hemorrhage on prescribed warfarin therapy. Am Surg 2008; 74:
858–61.
89 Vigue B, Ract C, Tremey B et al. Ultra-rapid management of oral
anticoagulant therapy-related surgical intracranial hemorrhage. In-
tensive Care Med 2007; 33:721–5.
90 Morgenstern LB, Demchuk AM, Frankowski RF, Grotta JC. Rebleed-
ing leads to poor outcome in ultra-early craniotomy for intracerebral
hemorrhage. Neurology 2001; 56:1294–9.
& 2011 The Authors.International Journal of Stroke & 2011 World Stroke Organization Vol 6, June 2011, 228–240 239
L. Masotti et al. Reviews
91 Krylov VV, Dash’ian VG, Shaklunov AA, Burov SA. The use of
frameless neuronavigation in the surgery of hemorrhagic stroke. Zh
Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova 2008:108(Suppl. 23): 3–6.
92 Oi S, Abdullah SH. New transparent peel-away sheath with neuroen-
doscopic orientation markers. Technical note. J Neurosurg 2007;
107:1244–7.
93 Huttner HB, Schellinger PD, Hartmann M et al. Hematoma growth
and outcome in treated neurocritical care patients with intracerebral
hemorrhage related to oral anticoagulant therapy: comparison of
acute treatment strategies using vitamin K, fresh frozen plasma, and
prothrombin complex concentrates. Stroke 2006; 37:1465–70.
94 Sjoblom L, Hardemark HG, Lindgren A et al. Management and
prognostic features of intracerebral hemorrhage during anticoagulant
therapy: a Swedish multicenter study. Stroke 2001; 32:2567–74.
95 Roitberg B, Emechebe-Kennedy O, Amin-Hanjani S, Mucksavage J,
Tesoro E Human recombinant factor VII for emergency reversal of
coagulopathy in neurosurgical patients: a retrospective comparative
study. Neurosurgery 2005; 57:832–6.
96 Goldstein JN, Fazen LE, Wendell L et al. Risk of thromboembolism
following acute intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurocrit Care 2009;
10:28–34.
97 Geerts WH, Bergqvist D, Pineo GF et al. Prevention of venous
thromboembolism: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-
based clinical practice guidelines (8th Edition). Chest 2008; 133:
381–453.
98 Claassen DO, Kazemi N, Zubkov AY, Wijdicks EF, Rabinstein AA.
Restarting anticoagulation therapy after warfarin-associated intra-
cerebral hemorrhage. Arch Neurol 2008; 65:1313–8.
99 Romualdi E, Micieli E, Ageno W, Squizzato A. Oral anticoagulant
therapy in patients with mechanical heart valve and intracranial
haemorrhage. A systematic review. Thromb Haemost 2009; 101:
290–7.
100 Crowther MA. Inferior vena cava filters in the management of venous
thromboembolism. Am J Med 2007; 120:S13–7.
101 Heninger MM. Commonly encountered prescription medications in
medical-legal death investigation: a guide for death investigators and
medical examiners. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 2000; 21:287–99.
102 Connolly SJ, Ezekowitz MD, Yusuf S et al. Dabigatran versus
warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Eng J Med 2009; 361:
1139–51.
103 Schulman S, Kearon C, Kakkar AK et al. Dabigatran versus warfarin in
the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism. N Eng J Med 2009;
361:2342–52.
104 Lassen MR, Ageno W, Borris LC et al. Rivaroxaban versus enoxaparin
for thromboprophylaxis after total knee arthroplasty. N Eng J Med
2008; 358:2776–86.
105 Roser-Jones C, Becker RC. Apixaban: an emerging oral factor Xa
inhibitor. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2010; 29:141–6.
106 Connolly SJ, Ezecowitz MD, Yusuf S et al. Dabigatran versus warfarin
in patients with atrial fibrillation. NEJM 2009; 361:1139–51.
107 van Ryn J, Ruehl D, Priepke H et al. Reversibility of the anticoagulant
effect of high doses of the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran, by
recombinant Factor VIIa or activated prothrombin complex concen-
trate (abstract 0370). 13th Congress of the European Hematology
Association, June 12–15, 2008. Haematologica 2008; 93(Suppl. 1):
148.
108 Crowther MA, Warkentin TE. Bleeding risk and the management
of bleeding complications in patients undergoing anticoagulant
therapy: focus on new anticoagulant agents. Blood 2008; 111:
4871–9.
& 2011 The Authors.International Journal of Stroke & 2011 World Stroke Organization Vol 6, June 2011, 228–240240
Reviews L. Masotti et al.