The material in this slide show is intended for presentation before neighborhood associations, PTA’s, church groups and similar community-oriented audiences. It is to be shown free of charge, for educational purposes only. It’s meant as a guide to help you acquaint your friends and neighbors with this important subject. No script is provided. Users are free to modify it by removing slides and/or adding their own new ones but not by changing the content of any of the original slides contained herein.

Thank you for sharing this resource with your community. - RNO

THINKING ABOUT FLUORIDEAN INFORMAL SLIDE PRESENTATION

copyright 2009 by Rae Nadler-Olenick

WHO SUPPORTS WATER FLUORIDATION?•THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION (ADA)

•THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL (CDC)

•THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (AMA)

•ALL STATE HEALTH DEPARTMENTS

•ALL AMERICAN DENTAL SCHOOLS, RESEARCH INSTITUTES AND MAJOR FUNDING ENTITIES

•YOUR FAMILY DENTIST

•THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

•THE SUGAR LOBBY

•THE GOVERNMENTS OF MOST ENGLISH-SPEAKING COUNTRIES

WHO DOESN’T SUPPORT WATER FLUORIDATION?THE REST OF THE WORLD

THINKING ABOUT FLUORIDE

LOOK WHAT CAME ALONG ABOUT THE SAME TIME AS FLUORIDE

Q: Do You Trust Politicians?

HEALTH BUREAUCRATS ARE POLITICIANS

•THEY MAKE THE HEALTH DECISIONS THAT AFFECT YOU•THEY RUN THE CDC, FDA, ADA AND SIMILAR ORGANIZATIONS•THEY ARE NOT YOUR FAMILY DENTIST OR FAMILY DOCTOR•THEY OFTEN LACK APPROPRIATE SCIENTIFIC TRAINING•THEY ARE WELL-PAID POLITICAL APPOINTEES•THEY ARE NOT ACCOUNTABLE TO THE PEOPLE•THEY REPORT TO THEIR BOSSES AT THE HIGHEST LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT, EDUCATION AND INDUSTRY•THEY SERVE CORPORATE INTERESTS

IF DR. MARCUS WELBY WERE IN CHARGE, WE COULD TRUST HIM. UNFORTUNATELY HE’S NOT.

Q: Do You Still Trust Health Bureaucrats?

WHY SHOULD WE ABANDON WATER FLUORIDATION?

• IT DOESN’T WORK

• IT’S BAD FOR YOU

• IT’S EXPENSIVE & WASTEFUL

WATER FLUORIDATION DOESN’T WORK

• BOTH THE CDC AND THE ADA ADMIT THAT ANY BENEFITS OF FLUORIDE COME FROM TOPICAL APPLICATION (AS IN TOOTHPASTE)

• LOOK AROUND YOU. YOU’LL SEE GOOD TEETH AN BAD TEETH, JUST AS ALWAYS. THE GULF BETWEEN THE DENTAL HEALTH OF LOW INCOME AND MIDDLE-CLASS CHILDREN IS AS GREAT AS EVER. PROPONENTS OF WATER FLUORIDATION AS A “SOCIAL EQUALIZER” CAN’T QUANTIFY THE BENEFITS.

WATER FLUORIDATION IS BAD FOR YOU

• FLUORIDE IS A TOXIC WASTE REGULATED BY THE EPA• THE CDC AND ADA BOTH RECOMMEND AGAINST USING

FLUORIDATED WATER FOR BABY FORMULA• FLUORIDE CAUSES FLUOROSIS, A DISFIGUREMENT OF

THE TEETH • FLUORIDE CAUSES AND/OR AGGRAVATES BONE AND

JOINT DISEASES• FLUORIDE AGGRAVATES DIABETES & KIDNEY DISEASE• FLUORIDE DAMAGES THE THYROID GLAND BY

REPLACING NECESSARY IODINE• FLUORIDE LOWERS IQ• EVERYONE RECEIVES THE SAME CONCENTRATION

REGARDLESS OF AGE, SIZE, ACTIVITY LEVEL AND STATE OF HEALTH

FLUORIDE IS A TOXIC WASTE REGULATED BY THE EPA

(a by-product of the phosphate fertilizer industry)

BOTH THE CDC AND THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION

ADVISE AGAINST MIXING BABY FORMULA WITH FLUORIDATED WATER

FLUORIDE CAUSES FLUOROSIS, A DISFIGURMENT OF THE TEETH

FLUORIDE CAUSES AND/OR AGGRAVATES BONE AND JOINT DISEASES

FLUORIDE AGGRAVATES DIABETES AND KIDNEY DISEASE

FLUORIDE DAMAGES THE THYROID GLAND BY REPLACING NECESSARY IODINE

FLUORIDE LOWERS IQ

EVERYONE RECEIVES THE SAME CONCENTRATION REGARDLESS OF AGE,

SIZE, ACTIVITY LEVEL AND STATE OF HEALTH

WATER FLUORIDATION IS EXPENSIVE AND WASTEFUL

• AUSTIN SPENDS OVER $300,000 ON WATER FLUORIDATION ANNUALLY

• LESS THAN 1% OF THE FLUORIDATED WATER SUPPLY IS CONSUMED AS DRINKING WATER

• THAT’S AT LEAST $297,000 WASTED!• THE MONEY COULD BE BETTER SPENT ON

REAL ORAL HEALTH PROGRAMS • (and by the way, where does all that tapwater that

isn’t consumed by drinking go? Back into the environment!)

HOW DID WE GET INTO THIS

SITUATION?

TWO THINGS CAME

TOGETHER

WORLD WAR II

EARLY* DENTISTS WHO STUDIED A CONDITION CAUSED BY EXCESSIVE

FLUORIDE IN DRINKING WATER

• COLORADO BROWN STAIN

• “TEXAS TEETH”

THEY THOUGHT THESE TEETH WERE

HEALTHY AND DESIRABLE.*1920’s and earlier

• THE DENTISTS NOTICED THAT MANY OF THEIR PATIENTS HAD UNSIGHTLY BROWN STAINS ON THEIR TEETH.

• THEY LIKEWISE NOTED THAT THOSE BROWN-STAINED TEETH SEEMED RESISTANT TO DECAY.

• THEY KNEW THAT UNUSUALLY HIGH AMOUNTS OF NATURALLY-OCCURRING FLUORIDE IN THE LOCAL WATER CAUSED THE STAINS.

• THEY CONCLUDED (INCORRECTLY) THAT FLUORIDE WAS ALSO RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DECAY RESISTANCE.

A FEW WORDS ABOUT THOSE DENTISTS’ “DISCOVERIES”

WHAT THE DENTISTS FAILED TO TAKE INTO ACCOUNT:

• THE NATURAL FLUORIDE SOURCE IN THE LOCAL DRINKING WATER WAS CALCIUM FLUORIDE. THUS THE PEOPLE WERE CONSUMING A GREAT DEAL OF CALCIUM.

• THE LOCAL POPULATION WAS WEALTHY (RANCHERS & FARMERS), HEALTH CONSCIOUS AND ABLE TO AFFORD THE BEST DENTAL CARE.

• THEY ENJOYED A HEALTHY DIET OF FOODS LOCALLY-GROWN ON THEIR RICH SOIL, INCLUDING GRAINS, VEGETABLES, BEEF AND AN ABUNDANCE OF MILK.

• THEY CONSUMED VERY FEW PROCESSED FOODS.

NOW BACK TO OUR STORY…

WORLD WAR II INDUSTRY REQUIRED FLUORIDE FOR:

• STEEL SMELTING• ALUMINUM SMELTING• URANIUM ENRICHMENT

WE COULD NOT HAVE WON THE WAR WITHOUT IT.

PRIOR TO WW II, FLUORIDE HAD NOT BEEN

WIDELY USED IN INDUSTRY. ITS TOXIC PROPERTIES QUICKLY BECAME APPARENT IN THE FACTORIES, WHERE WORKERS BECAME ILL WITH A VARIETY OF AILMENTS. FARMS DOWNWIND OF THE FACTORIES SUFFERED SERIOUS CROP AND ANIMAL LOSS.

FEARING A SPATE OF LAWSUITS, INDUSTRY AND GOVERNMENT (JOINED BY HIGHER EDUCATION, WHICH IS FUNDED BY BOTH) WENT IN SEARCH OF “EVIDENCE FAVORABLE TO LITIGATION.” THEY DISCOVERED THE FLUORIDE-IS-GOOD-FOR-YOUR-TEETH DENTISTS. THE REST IS HISTORY.

USING 2 OR 3 DENTISTS’ WRONG CONCLUSIONS AS A RATIONALE:

• THE INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE OBLIGINGLY DEFINED FLUORIDE AS A NUTRIENT (ALONG WITH CALCIUM, MAGNESIUM AND VITAMIN D).

• THE PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE SET THE “IDEAL” CONCENTRATION ARBITRARILY AS ONE PART PER MILLION IN DRINKING WATER – FOR EVERYONE .

• A MAJOR PUBLICITY CAMPAIGN - HEAVILY FUNDED BY INDUSTRY - WAS LAUNCHED TO “SELL” FLUORIDE TO THE PUBLIC.

• ALL AMERICAN DENTAL SCHOOLS AND RESEARCH LABS ADOPTED A PRO-FLUORIDE POSITION

• LATER, LAWS WERE CLEVERLY FASHIONED TO ENABLE BOTH THE FDA AND THE EPA TO AVOID RESPONSIBILITY.

SINCE 1945 THE “REGULATORY” AGENCIES HAVE CLUNG TO THEIR OUTDATED STANDARD DESPITE:

• MOUNTING EVIDENCE OF HARM• MOUNTING EVIDENCE OF CHRONIC OVER-

EXPOSURE FROM OTHER SOURCES, ESPECIALLY FOOD AND DENTAL PRODUCTS

• MOUNTING EVIDENCE OF INEFFECTIVENESS• THE 2006 NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL

REPORT, WHICH CONCLUDED THAT THE EPA’S MAXIMUM CONTAMINANT LEVEL (MCL) IS NOT PROTECTIVE OF HEALTH.

Some Examples:• IN THE MID-1980’S, UNDER HEAVY LOBBYING

PRESSURE FROM DOW CHEMICAL CO. WHICH MAKES FLUORIDE-BASED PESTICIDES,THE EPA RAISED THE MCL FOR FLUORIDE IN WATER FROM 2 TO 4 PPM.

• IN 1990, THE HEAD TOXICOLOGIST OF EPA’S DRINKING WATER DEPARTMENT, DR. WILLIAM MARCUS, WAS FIRED FOR SPEAKING OUT AGAINST FLUORIDE. HE SUED, AND WAS REINSTATED WITH BACK PAY AND PUNITIVE DAMAGES AFTER PROVING HIS FIRING WAS POLITICALLY MOTIVATED.

• IN 1994, A TOP TOXICOLOGY EXPERT, DR.

PHYLLIS MULLENIX, WAS FIRED FROM HER HARVARD-FUNDED JOB AFTER PUBLISHING RESEARCH CONNECTING FLUORIDE TO CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM DAMAGE IN LABORATORY RATS. SHE HAD EARLIER SPOKEN ON THE SUBJECT AT THE NIH IN WASHINGTON DC AND IN BOSTON.

• DURING THE LATE 1990’S, THE EPA’S OWN UNION OF SOME 1500 SCIENTISTS AND ENGINEERS ISSUED A STRONG STATEMENT AGAINST THE FLUORIDATION OF DRINKING WATER AND EVEN PARTICIPATED IN LAWSUITS AGAINST THEIR EMPLOYER IN AN EFFORT TO GET EPA’S SAFETY STANDARDS REVIEWED.

• IN 2001, A HARVARD GRADUATE STUDENT,

ELISE BASSIN, WHOSE RESEARCH SHOWED A LINK BETWEEN FLUORIDE AND A HIGHER INCIDENCE OF BONE CANCER IN YOUNG BOYS WAS REPUDIATED BY HER OWN MAJOR PROFESSOR, AND THE PUBLICATION OF HER WORK WAS DELAYED FOR FIVE YEARS.

• IN 2006, THE NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL’S REPORT ON FLUORIDE IN WATER CONCLUDED THAT EPA’S CURRENT ALLOWABLE MCL OF 4 PPM IS NOT PROTECTIVE OF HEALTH AND CALLED FOR A REVIEW OF THE STANDARDS. TO DATE, NOTHING HAS BEEN DONE.

Why Do They Act This Way?• FEAR OF LITIGATION. A TORRENT OF RUINOUS

LAWSUITS WOULD FOLLOW ANY ADMISSION THAT WATER FLUORIDATION HAS DAMAGED THE HEALTH OF MILLIONS OF PEOPLE.

• LOSS OF FACE. AN ADMISSION OF HARM WOULD SERIOUSLY DAMAGE THE PRESTIGE OF THE HEALTH BUREAUCRATS WHO ENDORSE WATER FLUORIDATION

• INERTIA. (IT’S EASIER TO KEEP FOLLOWING A FAMILIAR ROUTE THAN CHANGE DIRECTION).

• UNWILLINGNESS TO PART WITH LONG-HELD BELIEFS. SOME HEALTH BUREAUCRATS MAY ACTUALLY BELIEVE ARTIFICIAL FLUORIDATION IS SAFE AND EFFECTIVE. THEY’VE BEEN TOLD THAT MOST OR ALL OF THEIR LIVES, JUST AS WE HAVE.

The Moral of Our Story:

THE POWER OF A HANDFUL OF HIGHLY

PLACED BUREAUCRATS TO OBSTRUCT

THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE PUBLIC IS

LOCKED IN AT THE TOP. THEREFORE , IT

IS NECESSARY TO OPPOSE THEM AT THE

LOCAL LEVEL.

SAY NO TO WATER FLUORIDATION.

THE END