the massachusetts model system for educator evaluation teachers 21 dr. patricia b grenier 1

59
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Teachers 21 Dr. Patricia B Grenier 1

Upload: emily-lee

Post on 16-Dec-2015

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Teachers 21 Dr. Patricia B Grenier 1

The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation

Teachers 21

Dr. Patricia B Grenier

1

Page 2: The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Teachers 21 Dr. Patricia B Grenier 1

Objectives Assess Current Knowledge

Reflect on Progress to Date

Share Best Practices

Strategize Gathering Evidence

Formulate Observations and Feedback

Formulating Next Steps

2

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Page 3: The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Teachers 21 Dr. Patricia B Grenier 1

Let’s Review

3

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Page 4: The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Teachers 21 Dr. Patricia B Grenier 1

4

Every educator is an active participant in the evaluation process.

Collaboration and continuous learning are the focus.

Every educator and evaluator

collects evidence and assesses

progress

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary EducationMassachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Page 5: The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Teachers 21 Dr. Patricia B Grenier 1

By documenting and analyzing practice from multiple angles and over an extended period of time, educators and evaluators develop a more complete picture of performance, which leads to a more accurate and informed evaluation.”

Module 5 Facilitator’s Guide

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

5

Page 6: The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Teachers 21 Dr. Patricia B Grenier 1

Gathering Evidence – Key Points

There are three types of evidence required by regulations.

Evidence-based statements are critical and should connect to relevant Standards and Indicators.

One must develop tools and processes for gathering and organizing evidence.

6

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Page 7: The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Teachers 21 Dr. Patricia B Grenier 1

Artifacts in the Educator Plan

Review the Educator Goal Setting and Educator Plan form for Tom Wilson.

For your assigned action step, on a sticky note, write down two artifacts that could be collected to show progress toward the goal.

Post your sticky note on the section of the chart paper with the same number as your action step. 7

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Page 8: The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Teachers 21 Dr. Patricia B Grenier 1

Sources of Evidence for Summative Ratings Three categories of evidence must be collected for

each educator:1. Multiple measures of student learning, growth,

and achievement2. Judgments based on observations and artifacts

of professional practice3. Additional evidence relevant to standards

o This includes evidence collected by the educator and shared with the evaluator relating to fulfilling Standard III: Family and Community Engagement and Standard IV: Professional Culture from the Model System Teacher Rubric

8

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Page 9: The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Teachers 21 Dr. Patricia B Grenier 1

What does this look like?Products of Practice Related to Standards

Multiple Measures of Student Learning

Other Evidence Related to Standards

Artifacts

• Teacher-developed unit assessments

• Grade-level meeting notes

• Parent/teacher communication log

• PLC meeting notes

Observations• Notes/feedback from

short, frequent observations (inside/outside classrooms)

• Notes and feedback from announced observations

• Student work (quizzes, homework, presentations, etc.)

• Portfolios

• Performance assessments (including arts, vocational, health and wellness)

• Interim assessments

• State or district assessments

• Student and staff feedback (2013–14 school year)

9

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Page 10: The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Teachers 21 Dr. Patricia B Grenier 1

Implementation Responsibility

Educator responsibilities:o Identifying, collecting, and organizing artifacts/evidence

related to goal progresso Documenting action steps completedo Collecting and submitting common artifactso Collecting and submitting evidence related to Standards III

and IV Evaluator responsibilities:

o Making resources and supports availableo Identifying common artifacts/evidenceo Observing practice and providing regular and specific

feedback on performanceo Monitoring progress—including midpoint check-inso Organizing and analyzing evidence over time

10

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Page 11: The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Teachers 21 Dr. Patricia B Grenier 1

Evidence or Judgment?

Examine Handout 2. Highlight factual statements. Underline judgment statements or

statements not based on evidence.

11

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Page 12: The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Teachers 21 Dr. Patricia B Grenier 1

Artifact Cover Page

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

12

Page 13: The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Teachers 21 Dr. Patricia B Grenier 1

Running Record of Evidence Form

13

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Page 14: The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Teachers 21 Dr. Patricia B Grenier 1

Importance of Strategically Collecting Artifacts

OR

14

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Page 15: The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Teachers 21 Dr. Patricia B Grenier 1

Importance of Strategically Collecting Artifacts Artifacts should be a sample that

demonstrates educator performance and impact:o Aligned with educator goals, the Model

System Teacher Rubric, or school goals Number of artifacts to collect varies by

educator Artifacts can provide evidence of more

than one Standard or Indicator 15

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Page 16: The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Teachers 21 Dr. Patricia B Grenier 1

Strategies for Collecting Artifacts Identify common artifacts that all or

most educators will be expected to collect (e.g., lesson plans)

Share examples of high-quality, valuable evidence during faculty or team meetings:oMight include showing sample artifacts

that provide evidence of more than one Standard or Indicator 16

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Page 17: The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Teachers 21 Dr. Patricia B Grenier 1

Artifacts From Tom Wilson

17

Five artifacts with partially completed Artifact Cover Pages

Set Artifacts Location

A A two-day lesson plan Handout 3

B Unit assessment dataTeam meeting minutes

Handouts 4 and 5

C Parent communication logE-mail exchange

Handouts 6 and 7

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Page 18: The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Teachers 21 Dr. Patricia B Grenier 1

Identifying Evidence in Artifacts Within your school team, divide into pairs. Each pair will do the following: o Review one set of artifacts.o Complete the Artifact Cover Page for those

two artifacts.o Consider these questions:

– After reviewing these artifacts, what else might you want to know about Tom’s practice?

– What would you want to ask this teacher?18

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Page 19: The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Teachers 21 Dr. Patricia B Grenier 1

To Recap…Three categories of evidence:

1. Multiple measures of student learning, growth, and achievement

2. Judgments based on observations and artifacts of professional practice

3. Additional evidence relevant to standards

19

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Page 20: The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Teachers 21 Dr. Patricia B Grenier 1

1. Support

2. Organize

3. Communicate

20

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Page 21: The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Teachers 21 Dr. Patricia B Grenier 1

1. SupportSet Your School Up for Success

The more concrete the Educator Plan, the easier it is to identify and collect artifacts.

Share examples of high-quality, valuable evidence during faculty or team meetings:

o Demonstrate example artifacts that provide evidence of more than one Standard or Indicator.

Identify common artifacts that all or most educators will be expected to collect (unit assessments, parent-teacher logs, etc.).

21

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Page 22: The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Teachers 21 Dr. Patricia B Grenier 1

2. Organize

Adopt a process for organizing artifacts and observation notes by Standard or Indicator and/or goals:o Paper-based, e-mail-driven, or online “cloud-

based” system Calendar:o Review actions in Educator Plans and make

agreed-upon supports and resources available to educator teams and individuals throughout the year.

o Identify key points of contact throughout the year (observations and feedback, formative assessment conferences, and summative evaluations).

22

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Page 23: The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Teachers 21 Dr. Patricia B Grenier 1

3. Communicate Expectations

Avoiding the…

OR

23

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Page 24: The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Teachers 21 Dr. Patricia B Grenier 1

3. Communicate Expectations

Artifacts should be a sample that demonstrates educator performance and impact.

Evidence should be clearly tied to educator goals, Standards, or Indicators.

Provide everyone with a clear idea of what, how, and when to share products of practice.

24

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Page 25: The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Teachers 21 Dr. Patricia B Grenier 1

Back at your school…

Work with your team to identify how you will:

1. Support,2. Organize, and3. Communicate expectations

related to the collection of evidence at your school.

25

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Page 26: The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Teachers 21 Dr. Patricia B Grenier 1

Feasibility

Work with your team to identify how you will feasibly implement this aspect of the educator evaluation system. How will your school:

Provide necessary assistance and support to educators throughout the year?

Organize evidence collection? Communicate information and

expectations related to this process clearly and effectively?

28

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Page 27: The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Teachers 21 Dr. Patricia B Grenier 1

Reflecting

On the back of your implementation plan, list:o Three next steps for you personallyo Two challenges for implementing

artifact collection at your schooloOne question you still have regarding

evidence collection

27

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Page 28: The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Teachers 21 Dr. Patricia B Grenier 1

Homework

28

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Page 29: The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Teachers 21 Dr. Patricia B Grenier 1

Observations and Feedback___________________

29

Page 30: The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Teachers 21 Dr. Patricia B Grenier 1

Intended OutcomesAt the end of this session, participants will be able to: Describe the role of observation as a

methodology for gathering evidence of educator performance;

Delineate best practices for conducting high-quality short, frequent, unannounced observations; and

Craft timely, targeted feedback that is evidence-based and grounded in the Standards of effective practice.

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

30

Page 31: The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Teachers 21 Dr. Patricia B Grenier 1

31

Every educator is an active participant in the evaluation process.

Collaboration and continuous learning are the focus.

Every educator and evaluator

collects evidence and assesses

progress

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary EducationMassachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Page 32: The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Teachers 21 Dr. Patricia B Grenier 1

What the Research Says . . . Evaluators need multiple opportunities

and settings to observe and assess educator practice

Multiple observations paired with timely feedback are a key part of a strong evaluation system

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

32

Page 33: The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Teachers 21 Dr. Patricia B Grenier 1

Voices on Observation

Handout 1: Studies link classroom observations to student achievement , by Stephen Sawchuck

Handout 2: Mini-Observations – Seven Decision Points for Principals, by Kim Marshall

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

33

Page 34: The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Teachers 21 Dr. Patricia B Grenier 1

Active Reading

Underline statements you find to be important takeaways or themes from the article

Circle one word or phrase that represents the key takeaway or theme

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

34

Page 35: The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Teachers 21 Dr. Patricia B Grenier 1

Making Connections

What are the key messages and ideas in the two articles with regard to observations and feedback?

What are some best practices for observations and feedback?

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

35

Page 36: The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Teachers 21 Dr. Patricia B Grenier 1

Observing Practice: What can you see?

Inside the Classroom

Outside the Classroom

Teacher Student engagement

Classroom management

Differentiated instruction

Cultivating a safe learning environment

Professional collaboration (team meetings)

Family and community engagement

Collaborative data analysis

Principal Teacher Observations Family and community engagement

2-way communication

Communication of school vision

Safe learning environment

Collaborative planning

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

36

Page 37: The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Teachers 21 Dr. Patricia B Grenier 1

Principles of Brief Observations Frequent

Focused

Varied

Useful and Timely Feedback

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

37

Page 38: The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Teachers 21 Dr. Patricia B Grenier 1

Guiding Questions

1. What does it mean to be FREQUENT in your observations?

2. How does this principle of high-quality observations better support the improvement of teaching and learning?

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

38

Page 39: The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Teachers 21 Dr. Patricia B Grenier 1

Guiding Questions

1. What does it mean to be FOCUSED in your observations?

2. How does this principle of high-quality observations better support the improvement of teaching and learning?

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

39

Page 40: The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Teachers 21 Dr. Patricia B Grenier 1

Guiding Questions

1. What does it mean to be VARIED in your observations?

2. How does this principle of high-quality observations better support the improvement of teaching and learning?

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

40

Page 41: The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Teachers 21 Dr. Patricia B Grenier 1

Guiding Questions

1. What does it mean to be USEFUL and to give TIMELY FEEDBACK in your observations?

2. How does this principle of high-quality observations better support the improvement of teaching and learning?

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

41

Page 42: The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Teachers 21 Dr. Patricia B Grenier 1

Strategies for Collecting Evidence Identify a focus ahead of time

o Goals, specific Standards/Indicators

Record evidence, not judgmento Quotations, observed actions or movements

by teacher and students, literal descriptors, etc.

Be an efficient note-takero Establish abbreviations, paraphrase

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

42

Page 43: The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Teachers 21 Dr. Patricia B Grenier 1

Evidence versus Judgment EVIDENCE JUDGMENTT: “Explain your answer to me. Show me what you did.”

Teacher does a good job getting students to explain their reasoning

Students constructed sailboats using various types of materials independently

Teacher wasn’t engaged enough with the students and just sat at his desk 

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

43

Page 44: The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Teachers 21 Dr. Patricia B Grenier 1

Collecting Evidence Through Observation

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

44

Page 45: The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Teachers 21 Dr. Patricia B Grenier 1

Video I Background Kelli teaches 4th grade A math lesson is in progress Kelli’s goals focus on:

1. Improving students’ understanding of place value and properties of operations in order to perform multi-digit arithmetic (Standard 4.NBT.4-6); and

2. Using instructional practices that engage all students during independent or small group work time (Indicators II-A and II-B).

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dRczDWKhwlg&feature=youtu.be

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

45

Page 46: The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Teachers 21 Dr. Patricia B Grenier 1

Recording Evidence From An Observation

Compare/discuss the notes on the completed Observation Evidence Collection Form to evidence you collected

Identify points of agreement as well as evidence that was not included

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

46

Page 47: The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Teachers 21 Dr. Patricia B Grenier 1

Observation Debrief

What evidence did you see related to Kelli’s second goal, on a collaborative learning environment?

Did you see the same things her principal saw?

What did her principal miss that you noticed?

What evidence did you see of other Standards, Indicators or goals?

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

47

Page 48: The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Teachers 21 Dr. Patricia B Grenier 1

Value of Feedback

Targeted, Ongoing Feedback

Improved Educator Practice

Improved Student Achievement

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

48

Page 49: The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Teachers 21 Dr. Patricia B Grenier 1

Characteristics of Effective Feedback FOCUSED: feedback should focus on

what was observed EVIDENCE-BASED: feedback should be

grounded in evidence of practice CONSTRUCTIVE: feedback should

reinforce effective practice and identify areas for continued growth

TIMELY: feedback should be provided shortly after the observation

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

49

Page 50: The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Teachers 21 Dr. Patricia B Grenier 1

Constructing FeedbackKelli’s Goal: Using instructional practices that engage all students during independent or small group work time (II-A-2, II-B-2.).

Using your observation notes and the rubric: Draft two points of feedback for KelliFocus on feedback that is

oFocusedoEvidence-based, and oConstructive

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

50

Page 51: The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Teachers 21 Dr. Patricia B Grenier 1

Video II Background Chuck teaches 10th grade physics Chuck is a 3rd year, non-PTS teacher Chuck’s goals focus on:

o Helping students to analyze, interpret and communicate results of scientific investigations and translate numerical or technical information into words.

o Creating a safe and collaborative learning environment (II-B-1 and II-B-2)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AxBavxlDC9s

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

51

Page 52: The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Teachers 21 Dr. Patricia B Grenier 1

Aligning Evidence to Standards and Indicators

Review your notes with a partner

Work together to assign each evidence statement to a Standard and Indicator, using the full Teacher Rubric in your handout packet.

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

52

Page 53: The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Teachers 21 Dr. Patricia B Grenier 1

Evidence of Chuck’s Goals

During the video observation, what evidence did you see of:

Helping students to analyze, interpret and communicate results of scientific investigations and translate numerical or technical information into words.

Creating a safe and collaborative learning environment

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

53

Page 54: The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Teachers 21 Dr. Patricia B Grenier 1

Draft Feedback for Chuck

Draft feedback for Chuck based on the evidence you recorded

Come to consensus with your table on two to three pieces of feedback for Chuck

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

54

Page 55: The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Teachers 21 Dr. Patricia B Grenier 1

Suggested Homework for School Leadership Teams

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

55

Discuss and plan what an annual schedule of observations might look like in your school context.o Consider the number of evaluators, number

of teachers, and number of school days. o Consider setting deadlines for completing the

first observation of all teachers.o Consider having evaluators set a goal for

observation completion, like Kim Marshall did.

Page 56: The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Teachers 21 Dr. Patricia B Grenier 1

Suggested Homework for All School-Based Educators Try conducting a short observation of a

colleague Ask your colleague to observe you as

well Debrief/discuss the evidence that was

gathered and what was challenging about the process.

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

56

Page 57: The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Teachers 21 Dr. Patricia B Grenier 1

Feedback and Questions Please take a moment to complete the

feedback form being handed out. We appreciate your feedback!

Questions?o About this training:

E-mail [FACILITATOR/VENDOR EMAIL HERE]o About educator evaluation more generally:

E-mail [email protected]

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

57

Page 58: The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Teachers 21 Dr. Patricia B Grenier 1

Suggested Homework for School Leadership Teams Review and discuss your district/school

improvement plan and compare it with the Standards and Indicators to determine alignment. Begin to identify the type of evidence and data that are currently being collected that could help inform progress toward Educator Plans and goals.

58

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Page 59: The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Teachers 21 Dr. Patricia B Grenier 1

Suggested Homework for All School-Based Educators Work with a colleague, in a small group

or at a faculty meeting, to select a particular Standard from the Model System Teacher Rubric, and identify potential sources of evidence (data) to inform performance decisions. Discuss whether these data are easily accessible and comparable across classrooms.

59

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education