The future of anaerobic digestion and biogas utilization

Download The future of anaerobic digestion and biogas utilization

Post on 26-Jun-2016

213 views

Category:

Documents

1 download

Embed Size (px)

TRANSCRIPT

<ul><li><p>gpiorgerg,iver</p><p>BiogasAnaerobic digestionAnimal manureNutrient recyclingBiogas utilization</p><p>ncienimacattal p</p><p>Anaerobic digestion of animal manure and slurries offers several benets by improving their fertilizer</p><p>targetissuesuire inof anim</p><p>essary to close the loops from production to utilization by optimalrecycling measures (Fig. 1).</p><p>Biogas can be produced from nearly all kind of biological feed-stock types, within these from the primary agricultural sectors andfrom various organic waste streams from the overall society. Thelargest resource is represented by animal manure and slurries from</p><p>pogenic methane, which has 23 times the global warming potentialof CO2. Furthermore, 65% of anthropogenic nitrous oxide and 64%of anthropogenic ammonia emission originates from the world-wide animal production sector (Steinfeld et al., 2006).</p><p>If handled properly, manure can be a valuable resource forrenewable energy production and a source of nutrients foragriculture.</p><p>In the main part of northern Europe, the animal farms muststore the produced slurry specially designed storage tanks, with atotal capacity corresponding to 69 months of slurry production.Storage of slurry is necessary due to restrictions of its application</p><p>* Corresponding author. Address: Bioenergy and Green Engineering ResearchGroup, Esbjerg Institute of Technology, Aalborg University, Niels Bohrs Vej 8, 6700Esbjerg, Denmark. Tel.: +45 65504166; fax: +45 65501091; mobile: +45 21662511.</p><p>Bioresource Technology 100 (2009) 54785484</p><p>Contents lists availab</p><p>Bioresource T</p><p>lsE-mail address: jhn@aaue.dk (J.B. Holm-Nielsen).wastes, where biogas from anaerobic co-digestion of animal man-ure, combined with pre- and post-treatment technologies, play anincreasing important role.</p><p>The large amounts of animal manure and slurries produced to-day by the animal breeding sector as well as the wet organic wastestreams represent a constant pollution risk with a potential nega-tive impact on the environment, if not managed optimally. To pre-vent emissions of greenhouse gases (GHG) and leaching ofnutrients and organic matter to the natural environment it is nec-</p><p>represented by energy crops, of which most common are graincrops, grass crops and maize. Maize silage is among the mostpromising energy crops for biogas production (Braun et al., 2008).</p><p>When untreated or poorly managed, animal manure becomes amajor source of air and water pollution. Nutrient leaching, mainlynitrogen and phosphorous, ammonia evaporation and pathogencontamination are some of the major threats. The animal produc-tion sector is responsible for 18% of the overall green house gasemissions, measured in CO2 equivalent and for 37% of the anthro-1. Introduction</p><p>The overall pollution preventionKyoto agreement as well importantanimal health and food safety reqsolutions for handling and recycling0960-8524/$ - see front matter 2009 Elsevier Ltd. Adoi:10.1016/j.biortech.2008.12.046qualities, reducing odors and pathogens and producing a renewable fuel the biogas.The EU policies concerning renewable energy systems (RES) have set forward a xed goal of supplying</p><p>20% of the European energy demands from RES by year 2020. A major part of the renewable energy willoriginate from European farming and forestry. At least 25% of all bioenergy in the future can originatefrom biogas, produced from wet organic materials such as: animal manure, whole crop silages, wet foodand feed wastes, etc.</p><p> 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</p><p>s, the objectives of therelated to human andcreasingly sustainableal manure and organic</p><p>cattle and pig production units as well as from poultry, sh, fur,etc. In the EU-27 alone, more than 1500 mill. tonnes of animalmanure are produced every year (Table 1). European agriculturehandles more than 65% of livestock manure as slurry, a liquid mix-ture of urine, feces, water, and bedding material (Menzi, 2002). An-other agricultural substrate suitable for anaerobic digestion isKeywords:duction areas need therefore suitable manure management, aiming to export and to redistribute theexcess of nutrients from manure and to optimize their recycling.The future of anaerobic digestion and bio</p><p>J.B. Holm-Nielsen a,b,*, T. Al Seadi b, P. Oleskowicz-PoaBioenergy and Green Engineering Research Group, Esbjerg Institute of Technology, AalbbCentre for Bioenergy, University of Southern Denmark, Niels Bohrs Vej 9-10, 6700 EsbjcBiosystems Department, Ris National Laboratory for Sustainable Energy, Technical Un</p><p>a r t i c l e i n f o</p><p>Article history:Received 13 June 2008Received in revised form 11 December 2008Accepted 21 December 2008Available online 13 February 2009</p><p>a b s t r a c t</p><p>One of the common tendegeneral is to intensify the alivestock density is alwaysconsiderable pollution threimportant for environmen</p><p>journal homepage: www.ell rights reserved.as utilization</p><p>el c</p><p>University, Niels Bohrs Vej 8, 6700 Esbjerg, DenmarkDenmarksity of Denmark, P.O. Box 49, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark</p><p>s of animal production activities in Europe and in developed countries inal production and to increase the size of the animal production units. Highcompanied by production of a surplus of animal manure, representing afor the environment in these areas. Avoiding over-fertilization is not onlyrotection reasons but also for economical reasons. Intensive animal pro-</p><p>le at ScienceDirect</p><p>echnology</p><p>evier .com/ locate/bior tech</p></li><li><p>period as crop fertilizer to only 46 months interval, close to orduring the growing season. This restrictions aim to reduce nutrientleaching to ground water by increased utilization efciency by thecrops, if applied during germination and vegetative growth. In</p><p>in particularly ammonia and methane (Nielsen et al., 2002). Theproduced digestate can be further rened after the anaerobic treat-ment. One of the simplest methods is by separation with a decan-ter centrifuge into a solid and a liquid fraction. The dry mattercontent of the solid fraction is typically 2535%. It contains 6080% of the dry matter and phosphorus content of the original slur-ry, but only 2025% of the nitrogen and 1015% of the potassium(Mller et al., 2006). Separation facilitates the export of nutrientsfrom the areas with excess of manure and the redistribution ofnutrient to other areas in need of nutrients.</p><p>Throughout recent years, limited success was achieved by test-ing several physical, chemical and biological pre-treatment meth-ods, aiming to increase hydrolysis of the lignocelluloses structureof manure bers and by this to increase the biogas yield of digestedmanure (Mller et al., 2006). Separation can also be used as a pre-treatment of liquid manure, in order to produce a concentrated so-lid fraction which increases signicantly the biogas potential unitof per digested volume.</p><p>2. Anaerobic digestion of animal manure</p><p>Anaerobic digestion of animal manure has the general goal ofconvert organic residues into two categories of valuable products:on one hand biogas, a renewable fuel further used to produce greenelectricity, heat or as vehicle fuel and on the other hand the di-gested substrate, commonly named digestate, and used as fertilizer</p><p>H2O</p><p>O2CO2</p><p>FERTILISER</p><p>ANAEROBIC DIGESTION</p><p>BIOGAS</p><p>ELECTRICITY AND HEATORGANIC WASTES</p><p>VEGETABLE BIOMASS</p><p>ANIMAL MANURE</p><p>LIGHT</p><p>PHOTOSYNTHESIS</p><p>Fig. 1. Schematic representation of the sustainable cycle of anaerobic co-digestionof animal manure and organic wastes (Al Seadi, 2002).</p><p>J.B. Holm-Nielsen et al. / Bioresource Technology 100 (2009) 54785484 5479countries where there are no restrictions of the period of applica-tion, the storage time is shorter and slurry application seasonsare often determined by the existing storage capacity, rather thanconsiderations about nutrient utilization efciency (Petersen et al.,2006).</p><p>There is a positive relationship between N surplus and GHGemissions. Each kg of N surplus corresponds with a GHG emissionof approximately 3070 kg CO2-equivalents (Oenema et al., 2006).Biogas production from anaerobic digestion of animal manure andslurries is an effective way of reducing greenhouse gas emissions,</p><p>Table 1Estimated amounts of animal manure in EU-27 (based on Faostat (2003)).</p><p>Country Cattle Pigs Cattle</p><p>(1000 heads) (1000 heads) (1000 livestock units)</p><p>Austria 2051 3125 1310Belgium 2695 6332 1721Bulgaria 672 931 429Cyprus 57 498 36Czech R. 1397 2877 892Denmark 1544 13,466 986Estonia 250 340 160Finland 950 1365 607France 19,383 15,020 12,379Germany 13,035 26,858 8324Greece 600 1000 383Hungary 723 4059 462Ireland 7000 1758 4470Italy 6314 9272 4032Latvia 371 436 237Lithuania 792 1073 506Luxembourg 184 85 118Malta 18 73 11Netherlands 3862 11,153 2466Poland 5483 18,112 3502Portugal 1443 2348 922Romania 2812 6589 1796Slovakia 580 1300 370Slovenia 451 534 288Spain 6700 25,250 4279Sweden 1619 1823 1034UK 10,378 4851 6628EU-27 91,364 160,530 58,348in agriculture. Digestate can as well be further rened into concen-trated fertilizers, ber products and clean water, all suitable forrecycling.</p><p>Co-digestion of animal manure with various biomass substratesincreases the biogas yield and offers a number of advantages forthe management of manure and organic wastes (Nielsen et al.,2002) and for mitigation of green house gas (GHG) emissions.Anaerobic co-digestion of manure and digestible organic wastesfrom food industry is very important for the corporate economyof the biogas plants and for the socio-economic reasons (Braun</p><p>Pigs(1000 livestock units)</p><p>Cattle manure(106 tons)</p><p>Pig manure(106 tons)</p><p>Total manure(106 tons)</p><p>261 29 6 35529 38 12 4978 9 2 1142 1 1 2240 20 5 251124 22 25 4628 4 1 4114 13 3 161254 272 28 3002242 183 49 23283 8 2 10339 10 7 18147 98 3 102774 89 17 10636 5 1 690 11 2 137 3 0 36 0 0 0931 54 20 751512 77 33 110196 20 4 25550 40 12 52109 8 2 1145 6 1 72107 94 46 140</p><p>152 23 3 26405 146 9 15513,399 1284 295 1578</p></li><li><p>and Wellinger, 2003). Biogas from co-digestion of animal manureand suitable organic wastes is also a very attractive solution froma socio-economic point of view, when biogas externalities, includ-ing environmental, human and animal health benets are quanti-ed and integrated in the overall economic benets. For thesocio-economic point of view, admixture of organic waste to ani-mal manure digestion brings about important benets concerningincreased production of biogas and energy sales, savings related toorganic waste treatment, improved fertiliser value of digestate andreduction of GHG emissions from manure and organic wastes(Nielsen et al., 2002; Olesen et al., 2005; Hjorth et al., 2008).</p><p>There are many types of biogas plants in Europe, categorisedaccording to the type of digested substrates, according to the tech-nology applied or according to their size. The biogas plants digest-ing manure are categorised as agricultural biogas plants, and theyusually co-digest manure and other suitable organic residues,many of them of agricultural origin as well. A common classica-tion of the agricultural biogas plants is: (1) the large scale, jointco-digestion plants and (2) the farm scale plants. There is not asharp delimitation between these two categories as elements oftechnology from one category are also common to the other.</p><p>The EU-countries where the agricultural biogas plants are mostdeveloped are Germany, Denmark, Austria and Sweden and to a</p><p>of manure and organic waste treatment, nutrient recycling andrenewable energy production, generating intertwined agriculturaland environmental benets.</p><p>Fresh animal manure and slurry are collected from the pre-stor-age tanks at the farms, transported to the biogas plant and mixedand co-digested with digestible organic wastes. The anaerobicdigestion process takes place at thermophilic (5358 C) or meso-philic (3040 C) temperatures, during 1225 days. The hydraulicretention time decreases with the digestion temperature. Beforebeing added to the reactor content, specic substrates and animalby-products are submitted to a controlled pre-sanitation, aiming toinactivate pathogens and to break their propagation cycles. The di-gested biomass is transferred to the storage tanks, which are usu-ally covered with a gas proof membrane for the recovery of theremaining biogas production. The biogas plants can be equippedwith installations for separation of ber and liquid fractions.</p><p>Digested biomass is transported back to the farms, at the stor-age tanks placed out in the elds, as pathogen free and nutrition-ally dened liquid fertilizer and integrated in the crop fertilizerplan at each farm. The farms receive back only that amount of di-gested biomass which they are allowed by the law to apply on theirelds, according to the regulation on nutrient loading/ha. The ex-cess of digested biomass is sold by the biogas plant to crop farms</p><p>ratioesteas</p><p> Biisat</p><p>n of </p><p>lly d</p><p>por</p><p>5480 J.B. Holm-Nielsen et al. / Bioresource Technology 100 (2009) 54785484certain level the Netherlands, France, Spain, Italy, United Kingdomand Belgium. The technology is under current development incountries like Portugal, Greece and Ireland as well as in many ofthe new, Eastern European, member states, where a large biomasspotential is identied.</p><p>2.1. The joint biogas plant concept</p><p>The joint biogas plants co-digest animal manure collected fromseveral farms, mixed with suitable organic residues from the foodand feed industries and from the overall society. The joint biogasplants are usually of large scale, with digester capacities rangingfrom, e.g., few hundreds m3 up to several thousands m3.</p><p>One of the pioneer countries in developing agricultural biogasplants for manure and organic wastes co-digestion was Denmark,were the joint biogas plant concept was developed throughoutthe last two decades and represents today an integrated system</p><p>Animal farms* Cattle manure* Pig manure* Poultry manure</p><p>Sepaof dig biom</p><p>Centralised* Homogen* Digestion* Reductio* Sanitation* Nutritiona</p><p>Fertilizer on the fields* Improved utilisation of plant nutrients* Reduction of the consumption of mineral fertilizer* Reduction of water pollution</p><p> Trans</p><p>Storage facilitiesout in the fields</p><p>Transport SystemFig. 2. The main streams of the integrated concept of centralizin the region.The produced biogas is, e.g., used for combined heat and power</p><p>generation, or for upgrading and utilization as vehicle fuel, like inSweden (Nielsen et al., 2002; Persson et al., 2006). The producedpower is sold to the grid and the heat is distributed through thedistrict heating system to the consumers. Some of it is used bythe biogas plant as process heating.</p><p>The biogas production cycle represents an integrated system(Fig. 2) of renewable energy production, resources utilization, or-ganic wastes treatment and nutrient recycling and redistribution,generating intertwined agricultural and environmental benets,as listed below:</p><p> Renewable energy production. Cheap and environmentally healthy organic waste recycling. Less greenhouse gas emission. Pathogen reduction through sanitation.</p><p>n d</p><p>s</p><p>Other biomass suppliers* Industrial organic waste * MSW(organic)* Sewage sludge</p><p>ogas Plantion</p><p>odour nuis...</p></li></ul>

Recommended

View more >