the demographic promise of expanded female education? · schools from existing decs –tripled...
TRANSCRIPT
The Demographic Promise of
Expanded Female Education? Trends in Age at First Birth in Malawi
Monica J. Grant
University of Wisconsin-MadisonDepartment of Sociology
Center for Demography and Ecology
Education and Age at First Birth
• Education gradient in age at first birth (AFB)
– Most consistent association with secondary
school (Jejeebhoy 1995; Bledsoe et al. 1999;
Gupta and Mahy 2003)
• How education affects AFB
– Ideational changes
– Labor market prospects
– Autonomy development
Education Policy Change and AFB
• How association between education and
AFB changes over time (Gupta and Mahy 2003;
Lloyd 2005)
• Changing age of compulsory education
– Turkey (Kirder et al 2009); Ecuador (De Paoli 2009); Great Britain (Braakman 2011); Kenya (Ferre 2009)
• Variation in age at graduation
– Sweden (Skirbekk, Kohler, & Prskawetz 2004)
The Promise of Expanded Female
Education
• Jomtien 1990: “Education for All”
• Female education embraced as a population
policy at ICPD 1994
• Female education for economic development
– Girls Count
– “The Girl Effect”
– WDR 2012: Gender Equity and Development
– WDR 2007: Development and the Next Generation
Education not always empowering
• Gender biased classrooms
• Sexual harassment and abuse at
school
• Limited labor market outcomes for
educated women
• 1994: Free primary education policy
– 1993/4 enrollment: 1.9 million
– 1994/5 enrollment: 2.9 million
• 1998: Secondary school expansion
– Created Community Day Secondary
schools from existing DECs
– Tripled number of secondary school
students
Education Change in Malawi
• Did the education gradient in age at
first birth persist after Malawi’s
education policy changes?
• What factors have contributed to a
changing pattern of association?
Research Questions
Data
• Malawi DHS• 1992, 2000, 2004, 2010
• Age at first birth (months)
• Highest grade attended
None, Lower Primary,
Upper Primary,
Secondary
• Malawi Ministry of
Education, Science, and
Technology (MOEST)
data
Survey
year
Age when
free primary
introduced
Age when
CDSS
created
Exposure to
education
policies
1992 22-26 26-30 None
2000 14-18 18-22 Partial late
2004 10-14 14-18 Partial early
2010 4-8 8-12 Full
Women 20-24 Years Old at Time of Survey
Survey year Median years
of schooling
completed
Median age
of first birth
N
1992 2.9 18.9 953
2000 3.9 19.3 2957
2004 5.2 19.0 2870
2010 5.8 18.9 4555
Women 20-24 Years Old at Time of Survey
(1) (2) (3)
Coef S.E. Coef S.E. Coef S.E.
Survey year (ref. 1992)
2000 -0.01 0.01
2004 -0.01 0.01
2010 -0.02 0.01 *
Lower primary
Upper primary
Secondary or higher
Interaction terms
2000 * Lower primary
2000 * Upper primary
2000 * Secondary or higher
2004 * Lower primary
2004 * Upper primary
2004 * Secondary or higher
2010 * Lower primary
2010 * Upper primary
2010 * Secondary or higher
Accelerated Failure Time Regression: Age at First Birth
Note: All models control for urban/rural and region * p<0.05 ** p<0.01 *** p<0.001
(1) (2) (3)
Coef S.E. Coef S.E. Coef S.E.
Survey year (ref. 1992)
2000 -0.01 0.01 -0.02 0.01 **
2004 -0.01 0.01 -0.04 0.01 ***
2010 -0.02 0.02 * -0.05 0.01 ***
Lower primary 0.00 0.01
Upper primary 0.01 0.01
Secondary or higher 0.15 0.01 ***
Interaction terms
2000 * Lower primary
2000 * Upper primary
2000 * Secondary or higher
2004 * Lower primary
2004 * Upper primary
2004 * Secondary or higher
2010 * Lower primary
2010 * Upper primary
2010 * Secondary or higher
Accelerated Failure Time Regression: Age at First Birth
Note: All models control for urban/rural and region * p<0.05 ** p<0.01 *** p<0.001
(1) (2) (3)
Coef S.E. Coef S.E. Coef S.E.
Survey year (ref. 1992)
2000 -0.01 0.01 -0.02 0.01 ** -0.01 0.01
2004 -0.01 0.01 -0.04 0.01 *** -0.03 0.02
2010 -0.02 0.02 * -0.05 0.01 *** -0.03 0.02
Lower primary 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.02
Upper primary 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.02
Secondary or higher 0.15 0.01 *** 0.22 0.03 ***
Interaction terms
2000 * Lower primary -0.02 0.02
2000 * Upper primary -0.01 0.02
2000 * Secondary or higher -0.08 0.03 *
2004 * Lower primary -0.01 0.02
2004 * Upper primary -0.01 0.02
2004 * Secondary or higher -0.09 0.03 **
2010 * Lower primary -0.04 0.02 *
2010 * Upper primary -0.02 0.02
2010 * Secondary or higher -0.08 0.03 *
Accelerated Failure Time Regression: Age at First Birth
Note: All models control for urban/rural and region * p<0.05 ** p<0.01 *** p<0.001
• Selection
• Enrollment patterns and grade
progression
• School quality
Why has AFB declined among
secondary school attenders?
Passed Malawi Secondary Certificate Exam (MSCE)
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
1975 1985 1995 2005
Pe
rce
nt
of
stu
de
nts
wh
o p
asse
d M
SCE
Year
Total
Girls
Boys
(1) (2)
OLS First Stage (Yrs schlg) Second Stage (AFB)
Coef. SE Coef. SE Coef. SE
Years of schooling 0.29 0.01 ***
Exposure to Policy
1980-84 (vs. 1976-79)
Ethnicity (ref. Chewa)
Tumbuka -0.25 0.24
Lomwe -0.50 0.17 **
Yao 0.06 0.22
Ngoni -0.03 0.19
Other -0.16 0.18
Religion (ref. Catholic)
Protestant -0.03 0.11
Muslim -0.40 0.21
Other/none 0.10 0.59
Urban 0.03 0.15
Constant 17.47 0.25 ***
Linear Regression: Age at First Birth, Women Born 1976-1984
Note: All models include district-level fixed effects. * p<0.05 ** p<0.01 *** p<0.001
(1) (2)
OLS First Stage (Yrs schlg) Second Stage (AFB)
Coef. SE Coef. SE Coef. SE
Years of schooling 0.29 0.01 ***
Exposure to Policy
1980-84 (vs.
1976-79) 0.57 0.12 ***
Ethnicity (ref. Chewa)
Tumbuka -0.25 0.24 1.47 0.32 ***
Lomwe -0.50 0.17 ** 0.08 0.25
Yao 0.06 0.22 0.26 0.31
Ngoni -0.03 0.19 0.73 0.26 **
Other -0.16 0.18 0.01 0.27
Religion (ref. Catholic)
Protestant -0.03 0.11 -0.79 0.16 ***
Muslim -0.40 0.21 -1.64 0.30 ***
Other/none 0.10 0.59 -2.48 0.52 ***
Urban 0.03 0.15 2.71 0.20 ***
Constant 17.47 0.25 *** 5.63 0.35 ***
F-test (Exposure to policy) 23.48 ***
Linear Regression: Age at First Birth, Women Born 1976-1984
Note: All models include district-level fixed effects. * p<0.05 ** p<0.01 *** p<0.001
(1) (2)
OLS First Stage (Yrs schlg) Second Stage (AFB)
Coef. SE Coef. SE Coef. SE
Years of schooling 0.29 0.01 *** -0.44 0.21 *
Exposure to Policy
1980-84 (vs. 1976-79) 0.57 0.12 ***
Ethnicity (ref. Chewa)
Tumbuka -0.25 0.24 1.47 0.32 *** 0.83 0.43
Lomwe -0.50 0.17 ** 0.08 0.25 -0.44 0.26
Yao 0.06 0.22 0.26 0.31 0.27 0.31
Ngoni -0.03 0.19 0.73 0.26 ** 0.52 0.32
Other -0.16 0.18 0.01 0.27 -0.14 0.25
Religion (ref. Catholic)
Protestant -0.03 0.11 -0.79 0.16 *** -0.61 0.24 *
Muslim -0.40 0.21 -1.64 0.30 *** -1.62 0.48 ***
Other/none 0.10 0.59 -2.48 0.52 *** -1.78 0.82 *
Urban 0.03 0.15 2.71 0.20 *** 2.02 0.65 **
Constant 17.47 0.25 *** 5.63 0.35 *** 21.84 1.34 ***
F-test (Exposure to policy) 23.48 ***
Linear Regression: Age at First Birth, Women Born 1976-1984
Note: All models include district-level fixed effects. * p<0.05 ** p<0.01 *** p<0.001
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
1 2 3 4
Ave
rage
age
of
curr
en
tly
en
rolle
d s
tud
en
ts
Year of secondary school
1992
2000
2004
2010
Average Age Currently Enrolled Secondary School Students
School Quality
• Heterogeneity by type of secondary
school
– Differences in resources, teacher
qualifications, learning outcomes
– Schoolgirl pregnancy
– Labor market prospects
• What would have happened if
secondary expanded without FPE?
• How well does the experience of
Malawi predict what will happen
elsewhere?
Additional Questions
0
.05
.1.1
5
Den
sity
10 20 30 40 50afb
Distribution of AFB
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Pro
po
rtio
n a
ble
to
re
ad c
om
ple
te s
en
ten
ce
Highest Grade Completed
2000
2004
2010
Grade-specific literacy rates