the cngs target expectation vs. experience

26
The CNGS Target Expectation vs. Experience Presented by L.Bruno AB/ATB Experimental Areas, Targets and Secondary Beams Group

Upload: ting

Post on 22-Jan-2016

39 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

The CNGS Target Expectation vs. Experience. Presented by L.Bruno AB/ATB Experimental Areas, Targets and Secondary Beams Group. The CNGS Target Expectation vs. experience. OUTLINE 1. Requirements & engineering approach - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The CNGS Target Expectation vs. Experience

The CNGS TargetExpectation vs. Experience

Presented by L.BrunoAB/ATB Experimental Areas, Targets

and Secondary Beams Group

Page 2: The CNGS Target Expectation vs. Experience

The CNGS TargetExpectation vs. experience

OUTLINE

1. Requirements & engineering approach2. Material choices & target cooling

3. Engineering limits of the target 4. Handling overview

5. Summary

Page 3: The CNGS Target Expectation vs. Experience

Physical requirements…

… reliably intercept a 400 GeV proton beam every 6 s in a double fast extraction with 10.5 µs long spills at 50 ms

distance. The nominal beam intensity is 4.8x1013 protons

per cycle, but an ultimate intensity of 7x1013 protons must be considered in view of a possible beam upgrade.

The beam has a = 0.53 mm.

The CNGS Target has to …

Page 4: The CNGS Target Expectation vs. Experience

… and engineering requirements

… interact with a high intensity, well focused fast extracted beam of 750 kW average power. The target

must be located along the beam path within ±0.1mm in the transversal direction and must withstand the thermo-

mechanical shock and evacuate the deposited thermal energy. Spare targets, remote alignment and monitoring

are required.

The CNGS Target has to …

Page 5: The CNGS Target Expectation vs. Experience

The target elements

10 cm long carbon rods, Ø = 5mm and/or 4mm

protonbeam

Note: - target rods thin / interspaced to “let the pions out”

- target shall be robust to resist the beam-induced stresses

- target needs to be cooled (particle energy deposition)

Page 6: The CNGS Target Expectation vs. Experience

Engineering approach

The target should NOT be cooled by water, in order to avoid mechanical shocks.

Material choices should minimize the absorbed beam power and maximize radiation resistance.

The target should be a consumable item with in-situ spares.

The target station should allow remote handling by the crane.

The target station should allow remote calibration of the displacement system.

Page 7: The CNGS Target Expectation vs. Experience

Material choices

Window flange (SS 316 LN)

Finned tube(Al alloy 5083 H111)

EB weld

Ni-coatedBe

window(Ø1.5”) Ni-coated

Be window

(Be, Ø4”)

EB weld

Beam

The target unit is conceived as a static sealed system filled with 0.5 bar of He.

The tube has annular fins to enhance convective heat transfer. The choice of light materials limits the absorbed design power to less than

5 kW.

Target rods(carbon)

Support tube(2D C-C

composite)

Ag-coated Al Helicoflex joint

Page 8: The CNGS Target Expectation vs. Experience

Ten targets (+1 prototype) have been built. They are assembled in two magazines worth 500 kCHF each.

The target units

Page 9: The CNGS Target Expectation vs. Experience

-80

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

0 4 8 12 16 20 24

Support seat No.

Dif

fere

nce

[u

m]

Laser Tracker

MetrologyC- C supports

Beam

C- C Tube

C- C Tube

Laser Tracker

Target rod alignment Results of the lab measurements

Reference surface

Lab tests have proven that a monolithic 2D carbon-carbon structure can be built with a high precision. This is a major achievement of the project.

Page 10: The CNGS Target Expectation vs. Experience

The target magazineThe CNGS Target Station as-built

BPKGFast coupling systems

Indexing finger

The commissioning experience has proved that the active target unit can be changed with an in-situ spare within 15 min. Still, an erratic time-

out when disengaging the indexing finger has been detected which requires a reset of the exchange system. This is being investigated on

the target spare.

Page 11: The CNGS Target Expectation vs. Experience

The first target magazine…

…Is equipped as follows:

1. Graphite target with baseline geometry under helium (Graphite 2020PT by Carbone Lorraine);

2. Carbon target with baseline geometry under helium(Sintered Carbon SC24 by Sintec Keramik);

3. C-C composite target with baseline geometry under helium(Aerolor A035 by Carbone Lorraine);

4. Carbon target with baseline geometry under vacuum(Sintered Carbon SC24 by Sintec Keramik);

5. “Safe” target: Graphite target with all 5mm rods under helium (possibility to increase the beam size, 2020PT);.

Page 12: The CNGS Target Expectation vs. Experience

Measured rotation precisionof the target magazine

The location of the active target has been measured by a laser-tracker during a complete rotation of the target magazine.

The discrepancies shown in the diagram cumulate the local machining tolerances and the global precision of the target rotation mechanism.

The results are within the required precision of ±100 μm.

Beam

-100

-75

-50

-25

0

25

50

75

100

-100 -75 -50 -25 0 25 50 75 100

Dx [mm]

Dy

[mm

] 1

1'

2

3 4

5

Start

End

Page 13: The CNGS Target Expectation vs. Experience

CNGS target rod alignment Control by the laser tracker

Page 14: The CNGS Target Expectation vs. Experience

C-C Tube prototype Control at CERN – August 2004

Page 15: The CNGS Target Expectation vs. Experience

Air coolingSchematic side view

Target enclosure

Inlet target Inlet fixed shielding

Ou

tlet Beam

Page 16: The CNGS Target Expectation vs. Experience

Target enclosure

Ou

tlet

Beam

Fixed shielding

Air coolingSchematic top view

Metallic sheets fixed to the alignment table

Page 17: The CNGS Target Expectation vs. Experience

Engineering limits of the CNGS target

Mechanical Limits

Dynamic stresses (beam time-structure)

Static stresses (beam profile)

Thermal limits

Cooling (target density, thermal load dilution)

Radiation damage Defects (annealing at high T) Target failure (quick exchange, in-situ spares)

Presently, the limit of the CNGS target is set by the dynamic stresses. Spreading the extracted protons more batches and increasing the spacing of the proton extractions would allow to increase the proton beam intensity beyond 1 MW.

Page 18: The CNGS Target Expectation vs. Experience

Str

ess r

ati

o

/u

Time0 ms 1 ms

Estimated Target Stress Measured material properties

Based on the measured material properties, the estimated stress values are within the allowables under worst loading conditions

(1.5mm off-axis, ultimate proton spill on a cold baseline target without damping).

Preliminary results

Page 19: The CNGS Target Expectation vs. Experience

Handling principles

Shielding

Fiducials

Displacement

mechanism

BPKG monitor

Beam

Target magazine

Alignment table

Base tableTarg

et

en

clo

su

re

The target magazine is mechanically coupled to the BPKG monitor. They are aligned in the lab and are remotely handled as a single component (the « alignment table »). They rest on the « base table », bearing the displacement mechanisms. The cooling manifold is not shown.

Focal Point

Support disks

Page 20: The CNGS Target Expectation vs. Experience

The Target AssemblyThe CNGS Target as-built

Page 21: The CNGS Target Expectation vs. Experience

T40 - Schematic Vertical view

Proton beam

Fixed structure“Handled” structure

Target assembly

Target enclosure

Horiz. Base plane

Steel frame

Crane limit

Shield

Horn

lim

it

Page 22: The CNGS Target Expectation vs. Experience

The target within its shieldingThe CNGS Target Station as-built

Page 23: The CNGS Target Expectation vs. Experience

Fast coupling system

Out-of-shielding

Motorization

The base table

Guiding groove

Adjustable Table seat

The base table is placed automati-cally by guiding grooves on three adjustable seats.

The motorization driving the table mechanisms is located out of the shielding.

The connection is realized through the shielding by shafts provided with fast coupling systems.

Page 24: The CNGS Target Expectation vs. Experience

The four alignment motorizations have been assembled, cabled and successfully tested in the lab with the final local electronic control

system.

RotaryPotentiomete

r

DC Motor

Torque limiter

Switches

Fast mech. coupling

Alignment MotorizationMain parts

Page 25: The CNGS Target Expectation vs. Experience

Each motorization block is mounted together with a shaft holder on a support plate fixed to the shielding. The motorization and the holder

can be easily (de)mounted (< 60 sec) for maintenance.

Motorization block

Shaft holder

Support plate

Alignment MotorizationAssembly

Page 26: The CNGS Target Expectation vs. Experience

The project has delivered…

A new operational target station Complying with the specifications at “ultimate” beam

intensity; Successfully tested (mechanics, electronics, in local and

remote); Spare sub-assemblies

A complete spare target assembly (“base+alignment tables”);

A double of all motorizations and potentiometers; A double of electronic components (rack, cables);

A set of tools to maintain it “Hardware” tools (handling, alignment, transport,

testing); “Software” tools (detailed procedures for testing and

handling); Trained personnel to operate the target

Preventive and exceptional maintenance4 technicians (2 Mech. + 2 Electr)

Alignment (2 Geometers); Remote operation (1 Engineer); Radiation protection (2 Technician); Handling (2 crane/transport operators).

Summary