the 5g infrastructure association imt2020: 5g ppp ... wwrf/meetings/past events... · the 5g...

43
The 5G Infrastructure Association 27/10/2018 1 Werner Mohr Nokia, 5G PPP Evaluation Group Chair IMT2020: 5G PPP Evaluation Group activities

Upload: others

Post on 23-Sep-2020

9 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The 5G Infrastructure Association IMT2020: 5G PPP ... wwrf/meetings/past events... · The 5G Infrastructure Association 27/10/2018 1 Werner Mohr Nokia, 5G PPP Evaluation Group Chair

The 5G Infrastructure Association

27/10/2018 1

Werner Mohr

Nokia, 5G PPP Evaluation Group Chair

IMT2020: 5G PPP Evaluation Group

activities

Page 2: The 5G Infrastructure Association IMT2020: 5G PPP ... wwrf/meetings/past events... · The 5G Infrastructure Association 27/10/2018 1 Werner Mohr Nokia, 5G PPP Evaluation Group Chair

• Background of evaluation activities based on ITU-R process

• 5G roadmap, project portfolio and Evaluation Group members

• Radio Interface Technology submissions to ITU-R

• First evaluation results based on available information (examples)• Peak data rate

• Peak spectral efficiency

• Control plane latency

• Conclusions

27/10/2018 2

Outline

Page 3: The 5G Infrastructure Association IMT2020: 5G PPP ... wwrf/meetings/past events... · The 5G Infrastructure Association 27/10/2018 1 Werner Mohr Nokia, 5G PPP Evaluation Group Chair

Background of evaluation activities based on

ITU-R process

327/10/2018

Page 4: The 5G Infrastructure Association IMT2020: 5G PPP ... wwrf/meetings/past events... · The 5G Infrastructure Association 27/10/2018 1 Werner Mohr Nokia, 5G PPP Evaluation Group Chair

Usage scenarios for IMT-2020

and beyond (ITU-R)

27/10/2018 4Source: ITU-R: IMT Vision – Framework and overall objectives of the future development of IMT for 2020 and beyond. Recommendation

ITU-R M.2083-0 (09/2015), https://www.itu.int/dms_pubrec/itu-r/rec/m/R-REC-M.2083-0-201509-I!!PDF-E.pdf.

Page 5: The 5G Infrastructure Association IMT2020: 5G PPP ... wwrf/meetings/past events... · The 5G Infrastructure Association 27/10/2018 1 Werner Mohr Nokia, 5G PPP Evaluation Group Chair

Enhancement of key capabilities from

IMT-Advanced to IMT-2020 (ITU-R)

27/10/2018 5Source: ITU-R: IMT Vision – Framework and overall objectives of the future development of IMT for 2020 and beyond. Recommendation

ITU-R M.2083-0 (09/2015), https://www.itu.int/dms_pubrec/itu-r/rec/m/R-REC-M.2083-0-201509-I!!PDF-E.pdf.

Page 6: The 5G Infrastructure Association IMT2020: 5G PPP ... wwrf/meetings/past events... · The 5G Infrastructure Association 27/10/2018 1 Werner Mohr Nokia, 5G PPP Evaluation Group Chair

27/10/2018 6

Schedule for development of IMT-2020 radio

interface recommendation

Source: ITU-R WP 5D: Submission, Evaluation Process and Consensus Building for IMT-2020. 2017.

Step1 and 2

No.27 No.28 No.29 No.30 No.31 No.32 No.33 No.34 No.35

Step 3(0)

(1)

(40 months: #23 - #32)

Step 4

(20 months: #28 - #32)

(16 months: #31 - #34) (2)

Steps 5,6 and 7(3)

Steps 8

(4)(12 months: #33 - #36)

(28 months: #29 - #35)

WP 5D meetings

2016No.36

Steps in radio interface development process:

Step 1: Issuance of the circular letter Step 2: Development of candidate RITs and SRITsStep 3: Submission/Reception of the RIT and SRIT

proposals and acknowledgement of receipt

Step 5: Review and coordination of outside evaluation activitiesStep 6: Review to assess compliance with minimum requirementsStep 7: Consideration of evaluation results, consensus building

and decision

Step 8: Development of radio interface Recommendation(s)

Critical milestones in radio interface development process:(0): Issue an invitation to propose RITs March 2016 (2): Cut off for evaluation report to ITU February 2020

(3): WP 5D decides framework and key June 2020characteristics of IMT-2020 RIT and SRIT

(4): WP 5D completes development of radio October 2020interface specification Recommendations

IMT-2020 2-01

Evaluation of candidate RITs and SRITs by Independent Evaluation Groups

Step 4:

(1): ITU proposed cut off for submission July 2019of candidate RIT and SRIT proposals

No.26No.24 No.25No.23

2017 2018 2019 2020

Evaluation

RIT - Radio Interface TechnologySRIT - Set of Radio Interface Technologies

Page 7: The 5G Infrastructure Association IMT2020: 5G PPP ... wwrf/meetings/past events... · The 5G Infrastructure Association 27/10/2018 1 Werner Mohr Nokia, 5G PPP Evaluation Group Chair

• Step 4 – Evaluation of candidate

RITs or SRITs by independent

evaluation groups

– 5G Infrastructure Association

registered as Evaluation Group at

ITU-R

– Evaluation guidelines to follow in

ITU-R M.[IMT-2020.Submission]

– Additional evaluation methods

by Evaluation Groups may be

used and shared between

Evaluation Groups

– Coordination between

Evaluation Groups for

comparison and consistency of

results

– Evaluation reports to be sent to

ITU-R Study Group 5 as input for

WP5D and publication

27/10/2018 7Source: ITU-R WP 5D: Submission, Evaluation Process and Consensus Building for IMT-2020. 2017.

Step 1Circular Letter to invite

proposals for radio interface technologies and

evaluations

Step 2

Development of candidate radio interface

technologies

Step 5Review and coordination

of outside evaluation activities

Step 6Review to assess compliance with

minimum requirements

Step 7Consideration of

evaluation results, consensus building, and

decision

Descriptions of proposed radio interface technologies and evaluation reports

Step 8Development of radio

interface Recommendation(s)

Radio interface specifications (SPECS), sufficiently detailed to enable worldwide compatibility

Step 9Implementation of

Recommendation(s)

Step 4Evaluation of candidate

radio interface technologies by independent evaluation

groups, grouping of the technologies through consensus building

Coordination between independent evaluation groups

Step 3Submission/Reception of

the RIT and SRIT proposals and acknowledgement of

receipt

IMT-2020 2-02

ITU-R Outside ITU-R

IMT-2020 terrestrial component radio

interface development process

Page 8: The 5G Infrastructure Association IMT2020: 5G PPP ... wwrf/meetings/past events... · The 5G Infrastructure Association 27/10/2018 1 Werner Mohr Nokia, 5G PPP Evaluation Group Chair

• ITU-R report provides

detailed guidelines on

evaluation methodology

and procedures

– System simulation

procedures

– Analytical approach

– Inspection approach

– Usage scenarios

– Test environments

– Network layout

– Evaluation

configurations including

detailed parameter

settings

– Antenna characteristics

– Channel models for IMT-

2020 for system and link

level simulations

27/10/2018 8

Detailed ITU-R report of evaluation

guidelines

Source: ITU-R WP 5D: Guidelines for evaluation of radio interface technologies for IMT-2020. Report ITU-R M.24.12-0, 11/2017.

Characteristic for evaluationHigh-level assessment

method

Evaluation

methodology in this

report

Related section of Reports

ITU-R M.[IMT-2020.TECH PERF REQ]

and ITU-R

M.[IMT-2020.SUBMISSION]

Peak data rate Analytical § 7.2.2Report ITU-R M.[IMT-2020.TECH

PERF REQ], § 4.1

Peak spectral efficiency Analytical § 7.2.1Report ITU-R M.[IMT-2020.TECH

PERF REQ], § 4.2

User experienced data rate

Analytical for single band

and single layer;

Simulation for multi-

layer

§ 7.2.3Report ITU-R M.[IMT-2020.TECH

PERF REQ], § 4.3

5th percentile user spectral

efficiencySimulation § 7.1.2

Report ITU-R M.[IMT-2020.TECH

PERF REQ], § 4.4

Average spectral efficiency Simulation § 7.1.1Report ITU-R M.[IMT-2020.TECH

PERF REQ], § 4.5

Area traffic capacity Analytical § 7.2.4Report ITU-R M.[IMT-2020.TECH

PERF REQ], § 4.6

User plane latency Analytical § 7.2.6Report ITU-R M.[IMT-2020.TECH

PERF REQ], § 4.7.1

Control plane latency Analytical § 7.2.5Report ITU-R M.[IMT-2020.TECH

PERF REQ], § 4.7.2

Connection density Simulation § 7.1.3Report ITU-R M.[IMT-2020.TECH

PERF REQ], § 4.8

Energy efficiency Inspection § 7.3.2Report ITU-R M.[IMT-2020.TECH

PERF REQ], § 4.9

Reliability Simulation § 7.1.5Report ITU-R M.[IMT-2020.TECH

PERF REQ], § 4.10

Mobility Simulation § 7.1.4Report ITU-R M.[IMT-2020.TECH

PERF REQ], § 4.11

Mobility interruption time Analytical § 7.2.7Report ITU-R M.[IMT-2020.TECH

PERF REQ], § 4.12

Bandwidth Inspection § 7.3.1Report ITU-R M.[IMT-2020.TECH

PERF REQ], § 4.13

Support of wide range of

servicesInspection § 7.3.3

Report ITU-R M.[IMT-

2020.SUBMISSION], § 3.1

Supported spectrum

band(s)/range(s)Inspection § 7.3.4

Report ITU-R M.[IMT-

2020.SUBMISSION], § 3.2

Page 9: The 5G Infrastructure Association IMT2020: 5G PPP ... wwrf/meetings/past events... · The 5G Infrastructure Association 27/10/2018 1 Werner Mohr Nokia, 5G PPP Evaluation Group Chair

Today’s available ITU-R documents

Status ITU-R WP5D, November 2017

927/10/2018

• Minimum requirements related to technical performance

for IMT-2020 radio interface(s)

• Requirements, evaluation criteria and submission templates

for the development of IMT-2020

• Guidelines for evaluation of radio interface technologies for IMT-

2020

Source: ITU-R WP5D, October 2017.

Microsoft Word

Document

Microsoft Word

Document

Microsoft Word

Document

Page 10: The 5G Infrastructure Association IMT2020: 5G PPP ... wwrf/meetings/past events... · The 5G Infrastructure Association 27/10/2018 1 Werner Mohr Nokia, 5G PPP Evaluation Group Chair

Evaluation characteristics

Details and relations

1027/10/2018Source: 5G PPP IMT-2020 Evaluation Group.

Evaluation characteristics Evaluation means Band cases Usage scenario(s) Radio environment Uplink Downlink Network load Mobility Remarks

1. Peak data rate Analytical Single band eMBB n.a. yes yes n.a. n.a. Input from calculation in No. 2

Aggregated bands eMBB n.a. yes yes n.a. n.a. Input from calculation in No. 2

2. Peak spectral efficiency Analytical eMBB n.a. yes yes n.a. n.a. Input to No. 1

3. User experienced data rate Analytical for

single band and

single layer

Single band eMBB Dense urban yes yes n.a. n.a. Input from simulations in No. 4

Simulation for

multi-layer

Aggregated bands eMBB Dense urban yes yes n.a. n.a. Input from simulations in No. 4

4. 5th percentile user spectral efficiency Simulation n.a. eMBB Indoor Hotspot yes yes n.a. n.a. Input to No. 3/5, input from No. 14

n.a. eMBB Dense Urban yes yes n.a. n.a. Input to No. 3/5, input from No. 14

n.a. eMBB Rural yes yes n.a. n.a. Input to No. 3/5, input from No. 14

5. Average spectral efficiency Simulation n.a. eMBB Indoor Hotspot yes yes n.a. n.a. Input from simulations in No. 4, 14

n.a. eMBB Dense Urban yes yes n.a. n.a. Input from simulations in No. 4, 14

n.a. eMBB Rural yes yes n.a. n.a. Input from simulations in No. 4, 14

6. Area traffic capacity Analytical Single band eMBB Indoor Hotspot yes yes n.a. n.a. Input from simulations in No. 5, 14

Aggregated bands eMBB Indoor Hotspot yes yes n.a. n.a. Input from simulations in No. 5, 14

7. User plane latency Analytical n.a. eMBB n.a. yes yes n.a. n.a. n.a.

n.a. URLLC n.a. yes yes n.a. n.a. n.a.

8. Control plane latency Analytical n.a. eMBB n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.

n.a. URLLC n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.

9. Connection density Simulation n.a. MTC n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.

10. Energy efficiency Inspection n.a. eMBB n.a. n.a. n.a. loaded case n.a. Input from simulations in No. 5

n.a. eMBB n.a. n.a. n.a. no load n.a. n.a.

11. Reliability Simulation n.a. URLLC Urban Marco n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.

12. Mobility Simulation n.a. eMBB Indoor Hotspot yes n.a. n.a. Stationary Input from No. 14

n.a. eMBB Indoor Hotspot yes n.a. n.a. Pedestrian Input from No. 14

n.a. eMBB Dense Urban yes n.a. n.a. Stationary Input from No. 14

n.a. eMBB Dense Urban yes n.a. n.a. Pedestrian Input from No. 14

n.a. eMBB Dense Urban yes n.a. n.a. Vehicular Input from No. 14

n.a. eMBB Rural yes n.a. n.a. Pedestrian Input from No. 14

n.a. eMBB Rural yes n.a. n.a. Vehicular Input from No. 14

n.a. eMBB Rural yes n.a. n.a. High speed vehicular Input from No. 14

13. Mobility interruption time Analytical n.a. eMBB n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.

n.a. URLLC n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.

14. Bandwidth Inspection n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.

15. Support of wide range of services Inspection n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.

16. Supported spectrum band(s) / range(s) Inspection n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.

Page 11: The 5G Infrastructure Association IMT2020: 5G PPP ... wwrf/meetings/past events... · The 5G Infrastructure Association 27/10/2018 1 Werner Mohr Nokia, 5G PPP Evaluation Group Chair

Registered IMT-2020 Evaluation Groups

Status: December 2017

1127/10/2018Source: ITU-R. http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-R/study-groups/rsg5/rwp5d/imt-2020/Pages/submission-eval.aspx.

• 5G Infrastructure Association - 5G PPP web site Europe

• ATIS WTSC IMT-2020 Evaluation Group - WTSC web site USA

• ChEG Chinese EvaluaHon Group - ChEG web site China

• Canadian Evaluation Group - CEG web site Canada

• Wireless World Research Forum - WWRF web site Global

• Telecom Centres of Excellence, India - TCOE web site India

• The Fifth Generation Mobile Communications Promotion Forum, Japan - 5GMF

web site Japan

• TTA 5G Technology Evaluation Special Project Group - TTA SPG33 web site Korea

• Trans-Pacific Evaluation Group - TPCEG web site USA – Taiwan

• ETSI Evaluation Group - ETSI web site Europe

• Egyptian Evaluation Group Africa

Page 12: The 5G Infrastructure Association IMT2020: 5G PPP ... wwrf/meetings/past events... · The 5G Infrastructure Association 27/10/2018 1 Werner Mohr Nokia, 5G PPP Evaluation Group Chair

5G roadmap, project portfolio and Evaluation

Group members

1227/10/2018

Page 13: The 5G Infrastructure Association IMT2020: 5G PPP ... wwrf/meetings/past events... · The 5G Infrastructure Association 27/10/2018 1 Werner Mohr Nokia, 5G PPP Evaluation Group Chair

13

5G PPP Vision and Requirements

5G roadmap

Source: 5G Infrastructure Association: 5G Empowering vertical industries White Paper, February 2016.27/10/2018

Page 14: The 5G Infrastructure Association IMT2020: 5G PPP ... wwrf/meetings/past events... · The 5G Infrastructure Association 27/10/2018 1 Werner Mohr Nokia, 5G PPP Evaluation Group Chair

27/10/2018 14

Horizon 2020 5G PPP

Call 1 selected projects – 07.2015 – 06.2017 (06.2018)

Source: 5G PPP, https://5g-ppp.eu/5g-ppp-phase-1-projects/.

Euro-5G5G PPP Coordination

and Support Action

CHARISMAConverged Heterogeneous Advanced

5G Cloud-RAN Architecture for

Intelligent and Secure Media Access

5G EnsureSecurity

(Will be added later)

Security

5GEx5G Exchange

CogNetBuilding an Intelligent System of

Insights and Action for 5G Network

Management

SELFNETFramework for SELF-organized network

management in virtualized and

software defined NETworks

Network automation

5G-XhaulDynamically Reconfigurable Optical-Wireless

Backhaul/Fronthaul with Cognitive Control

Plane for Small Cells and Cloud-RANs

5G-CrosshaulThe 5G Integrated fronthaul/backhaul

Fronthaul/Backhaul

VirtuWindVirtual and programmable

industrial network prototype

deployed in operational Wind park

SONATAService Programming and

Orchestration for Virtualized

Software Networks

SUPERFLUIDITYSuperfluidity: a

super-fluid, cloud-native, converged

edge system

SESAMESmall cEllS coordinAtion for

Multi-tenancy and Edge services

SDN, NFV, Cloud andVirtualisation

5G-Norma5G NOvel Radio Multiservice

adaptive network ArchitectureMETIS-IIMobile and wireless communications

Enablers for Twenty-twenty (2020)

Information Society-II

COHERENTCoordinated control and spectrum

management for 5G heterogeneous

radio access networks

SPEED-5Gquality of Service Provision and capacity

Expansion through Extended-DSA for 5G

mmMAGICMillimetre-Wave Based Mobile Radio Access Network

for Fifth Generation Integrated Communications

Radio-related cluster

FANTASTIC-5GFlexible Air iNTerfAce for Scalable service delivery

wiThin wIreless Communication networks of the 5th

Generation

Flex5GwareFlexible and

efficient

hardware/softwar

e platforms for 5G

network elements

and devices

Hardware implementation

Page 15: The 5G Infrastructure Association IMT2020: 5G PPP ... wwrf/meetings/past events... · The 5G Infrastructure Association 27/10/2018 1 Werner Mohr Nokia, 5G PPP Evaluation Group Chair

27/10/2018 15

Horizon 2020 5G PPP

Call 2 selected projects – 06.2017 – 11.2019 (08.2020)

Source: 5G PPP, https://5g-ppp.eu/5g-ppp-phase-2-projects/.

Page 16: The 5G Infrastructure Association IMT2020: 5G PPP ... wwrf/meetings/past events... · The 5G Infrastructure Association 27/10/2018 1 Werner Mohr Nokia, 5G PPP Evaluation Group Chair

Members of the 5G PPP IMT-2020

Evaluation Group

1627/10/2018

• Supporting 5G PPP projects• Phase II

• One5G

• 5G Essence

• 5G MoNAarch

• 5G Xcast

• To-Euro-5G CSA

• Phase III• 5G VINNI

• Supporting 5G Infrastructure Association Members• Huawei

• Nokia

• Telenor

• Turkcell

Source: 5G PPP IMT-2020 Evaluation Group.

Page 17: The 5G Infrastructure Association IMT2020: 5G PPP ... wwrf/meetings/past events... · The 5G Infrastructure Association 27/10/2018 1 Werner Mohr Nokia, 5G PPP Evaluation Group Chair

Radio Interface Technology submissions to

ITU-R

1727/10/2018

Page 18: The 5G Infrastructure Association IMT2020: 5G PPP ... wwrf/meetings/past events... · The 5G Infrastructure Association 27/10/2018 1 Werner Mohr Nokia, 5G PPP Evaluation Group Chair

Submissions of Radio Interface Technologies

(RTIs), July 2018

1827/10/2018

• RIT submissions to ITU-R

• 3GPP:• Initial submission in February 2018

• Update of proposal in October 2018

• Final submission in July 2019

• China:• Initial submission in February 2018 based on 3GPP Release 15

• Korea:• Initial submission in February 2018

• Deviations from 3GPP Release 15

• Based on trial specification for Winter Olympic Games in Korea

• ETSI DECT:• Initial submission in July 2018

• Different approach than 3GPP

• TSDSI:• Initial submission in July 2018

• Basically the same approach as 3GPP Release 15

• 5G PPP Evaluation Group is focussing on 3GPP submission

Source: 5G Infrastructure Association.

Page 19: The 5G Infrastructure Association IMT2020: 5G PPP ... wwrf/meetings/past events... · The 5G Infrastructure Association 27/10/2018 1 Werner Mohr Nokia, 5G PPP Evaluation Group Chair

27/10/2018 19

3GPP time schedule on IMT-2020 radio

interface submissions

Source: 3GPP.

IMT2020 submission - timeplan

Page 20: The 5G Infrastructure Association IMT2020: 5G PPP ... wwrf/meetings/past events... · The 5G Infrastructure Association 27/10/2018 1 Werner Mohr Nokia, 5G PPP Evaluation Group Chair

First evaluation characteristics based on

available information

2027/10/2018

Page 21: The 5G Infrastructure Association IMT2020: 5G PPP ... wwrf/meetings/past events... · The 5G Infrastructure Association 27/10/2018 1 Werner Mohr Nokia, 5G PPP Evaluation Group Chair

First evaluation characteristics based on

available information

2127/10/2018

• First evaluation characteristics done or initial considerations based on

available information from initial submission• Peak data rate (final)

• Following slides

• Peak spectral efficiency (final)

• Following slides

• Control plane latency (first considerations)

• Following slides

• Bandwidth (final, Evaluation Report Section III.14)

• Supported bandwidths meet requirements

• Support of wide range of services (first considerations, Evaluation Report Section III.15)

• Supported spectrum band(s)/range(s) (final, Evaluation Report Section III.16)

• Supported spectrum bands meet requirements

• Calibration of simulators ongoing

• Necessary information on other characteristics expected in submission

to ITU-R in October 2018

Source: 5G PPP IMT-2020 Evaluation Group.

Page 22: The 5G Infrastructure Association IMT2020: 5G PPP ... wwrf/meetings/past events... · The 5G Infrastructure Association 27/10/2018 1 Werner Mohr Nokia, 5G PPP Evaluation Group Chair

Jose Luis Carcel, Manuel FuentesUniversitat Politecnica de Valencia (UPV).

5G New RadioIMT-2020 Evaluation: Peak data rate and peak spectral efficiency calculation

Page 23: The 5G Infrastructure Association IMT2020: 5G PPP ... wwrf/meetings/past events... · The 5G Infrastructure Association 27/10/2018 1 Werner Mohr Nokia, 5G PPP Evaluation Group Chair

23

Peak data rate formula [Analysis]

• Calculated as:

� �: Number of aggregated component carriers (CC) in a frequency band. Values from 1 up to 16.

� ����: Scaling factor related to the proportion of resources used in DL/UL transmissions.

� FDD DL and UL: �� � 1.� TDD DL and UL: �� depends on the frame structure and the Slot Format Indicator (SFI).

Example TDD DL:- Frame structure: DDDSUDDDSU (D: Downlink, U: Uplink, S: Mixed Downlink and Uplink).- Slot structure for Mixed Frames:

» SFI = 31: 11 OFDM symbols (DL), 2 OFDM symbols (UL), 1 OFDM symbol (GP).

- ���� :

» 6 out of 10 frames are fully dedicated to DL. ��� � 0.6» 2 out of 10 frames are partially dedicated to DL. 12 out of 14 OFDM symbols per slot. ��� � �

�� ·���� � 0.1714

» ���� � ���+���� 0.7714� �: Number of layers when multiple antennas are used. DL values from 1 up to 8. UL values from 1 up to 4.

� ��: Maximum modulation order (�� � 8�.� �� !: Maximum CR ("�#$ � 0.925�.� (���: Scaling factor used to reflect the capability mismatch between baseband and RF capability for both Standalone UE and Non-

Standalone UE. Values: 1 or 0.75.

� µ: Numerology. Integer values from 0 up to 4.

� )*+: Total OFDM symbol duration in seconds. Depends on numerology and the CP type.

� ,-�../ : Maximum RB allocation in the available BW. It is multiplied by 12 to obtain the number of REs.

� 01 � : Overhead introduced by physical channels and signals.

Peak data rate

23 �4 · 5�#6789 · �� · : · "�#$ ·;<=>>? ,A · 12

B9A· 1 C DE

F

G�

Page 24: The 5G Infrastructure Association IMT2020: 5G PPP ... wwrf/meetings/past events... · The 5G Infrastructure Association 27/10/2018 1 Werner Mohr Nokia, 5G PPP Evaluation Group Chair

24

Peak data rate formula [Analysis]

• Calculated as:

Peak data rate

23 �4 · 5�#6789 · �� · : · "�#$ ·;<=>>? ,A · 12

B9A· 1 C DE

F

G�

,-�../ � ./H((IJI K LM

Frequency range Numerology (µ) SCS(kHz)Maximum BW (MHz)

EffectiveBW (MHz) ,-�../

FR1(450 MHz - 6 GHz)

0 15 50 48.6 2701 30 100 98.28 2732 60 100 97.2 135

FR2(24.25 GHz - 52.6

GHz)

2 60 200 190.08 264

3 120 400 380.16 264

1 The impact of the frequency guard bands on the available bandwidth is considered for the ,-�../ calculation.

Page 25: The 5G Infrastructure Association IMT2020: 5G PPP ... wwrf/meetings/past events... · The 5G Infrastructure Association 27/10/2018 1 Werner Mohr Nokia, 5G PPP Evaluation Group Chair

25

Peak data rate formula [Analysis]

Peak data rate

• Overhead (DE��)� Specifies the ratio of REs occupied by L1/L2 control, synchronization signals, reference signals

and guard bands with respect to the total number of REs available for the effective bandwidthin a 5G NR frame (time interval of 10 ms).

� Overhead can be calculated for DL and UL transmissions:

Downlink Uplink

� Depending on the transmission mode, different OH values and peak data rates are obtained:� DE��,N�� and peak data rate for FDD DL.

� DE��,O�� and peak data rate for TDD DL.

� DEP�,N�� and peak data rate for FDD UL.

� DEP�,O�� and peak data rate for TDD UL.

DEP� �DE<=QRS T DE<PRRS T DE<PURS

BVWXY"Z[\]DE�� �DEUU <⁄ >RS T DE<�RRS T DE<�URS T DE_<

BVWXY"Z[`]

Page 26: The 5G Infrastructure Association IMT2020: 5G PPP ... wwrf/meetings/past events... · The 5G Infrastructure Association 27/10/2018 1 Werner Mohr Nokia, 5G PPP Evaluation Group Chair

26

FDD DL: Peak data rate [Analysis]

• Calculated as: Example:

� a: Number of component carriers (CC) in a frequency band. 16

� ��:Scaling factor for the proportion of resources used in FDD DL. 0.7714

� �:Number of layers when multiple antennas are used in DL. 8

� :��: Scaling for the capability mismatch between baseband and RF. 1

� �� is the maximum modulation order. 8

� "�#$ is the maximum CR. 0.925

� µ is the numerology. 0

� B9 is the total OFDM symbol duration in seconds (Normal CP). 71.37 µs

� ;<=>>? is the maximum RB allocation in the effective BW. 270

� OH is the overhead. 0.1044

Peak data rate

23 �4 1 · 8 · 8 · 1 · 0.925 · 270 · 1271.37 · 10cd 1 C 0.1044 � 38.51efg[

�d

G�

Page 27: The 5G Infrastructure Association IMT2020: 5G PPP ... wwrf/meetings/past events... · The 5G Infrastructure Association 27/10/2018 1 Werner Mohr Nokia, 5G PPP Evaluation Group Chair

27

FDD DL: Peak data rate [Analysis]

• Extrapolation to all configurations (Gbps) through two possible approaches:

� 1. Maximum peak data rate for the maximum number of component carriers (CC=16).

� 2. Maximum peak data rate for the minimum number of CC that fulfils the IMT-2020 requirement.

Peak data rate

Freq. Band

NumerologyBandwidth

(MHz)hi

SISO

hiMIMO

Number of CC

hiSISO + CA

hiMIMO + CA

FR10 50 0.30 2.40 16 4.81 38.511 100 0.60 4.87 16 9.74 77.992 100 0.59 4.78 16 9.57 76.59

IMT-2020 Required Value DL: 20 Gbps

Freq. Band

NumerologyBandwidth

(MHz)hi

SISO

hiMIMO

Number of CC

hiSISO + CA

hiMIMO + CA

FR10 50 0.30 2.40 9 2.70 21.661 100 0.60 4.87 5 3.04 24.372 100 0.59 4.78 5 2.99 23.93

CA: Carrier aggregationCC: Component Carriers

Page 28: The 5G Infrastructure Association IMT2020: 5G PPP ... wwrf/meetings/past events... · The 5G Infrastructure Association 27/10/2018 1 Werner Mohr Nokia, 5G PPP Evaluation Group Chair

28

TDD DL: Peak data rate [Analysis] (SFI 31)

• Calculated as: Example:

� a: Number of component carriers (CC) in a frequency band. 16

� ��:Scaling factor for the proportion of resources used in TDD DL1 0.7714

� �:Number of layers when multiple antennas are used in DL. 8

� :��: Scaling for the capability mismatch between baseband and RF. 1

� �� is the maximum modulation order. 8

� "�#$ is the maximum CR. 0.925

� µ is the numerology. 0

� B9 is the total OFDM symbol duration in seconds (Normal CP). 71.37 µs

� ;<=>>? is the maximum RB allocation in the effective BW. 270

� OH is the overhead. 0.1284

Peak data rate

23 �4 0.77 · 8 · 8 · 1 · 0.925 · 270 · 1271.37 · 10cd 1 C 0.128 � 28.9efg[

�d

G�

1 Frame structure: DDDMUDDDMU, M frames with SFI: 31

Page 29: The 5G Infrastructure Association IMT2020: 5G PPP ... wwrf/meetings/past events... · The 5G Infrastructure Association 27/10/2018 1 Werner Mohr Nokia, 5G PPP Evaluation Group Chair

29

TDD DL: Peak data rate [Analysis] (SFI 31)

• Extrapolation to all configurations (Gbps) through two possible approaches:

� Maximum peak data rate for the maximum number of component carriers (CC=16).

� Maximum peak data rate for the minimum number of CC that fulfil the IMT-2020 requirement.

Peak data rate

Freq. Band

NumerologyBandwidth

(MHz)hi

SISO

hiMIMO

Number of CC

hiSISO + CA

hiMIMO + CA

FR10 50 0.22 1.80 16 3.61 28.911 100 0.45 3.66 16 7.32 58.562 100 0.44 3.59 16 7.19 57.52

FR22 200 0.82 6.59 16 13.19 105.563 400 1.65 13.25 16 26.51 212.09

IMT-2020 Required Value DL: 20 Gbps

Freq. Band

NumerologyBandwidth

(MHz)hi

SISO

hiMIMO

Number of CC

hiSISO + CA

hiMIMO + CA

FR10 50 0.22 1.80 12 2.71 21.681 100 0.45 3.66 6 2.74 21.962 100 0.44 3.59 6 2.69 21.57

FR22 200 0.82 6.59 4 3.29 26.393 400 1.65 13.25 2 3.31 26.51

CA: Carrier aggregationCC: Component Carriers

Page 30: The 5G Infrastructure Association IMT2020: 5G PPP ... wwrf/meetings/past events... · The 5G Infrastructure Association 27/10/2018 1 Werner Mohr Nokia, 5G PPP Evaluation Group Chair

30

FDD UL: Peak data rate [Analysis]

• Calculated as: Example:

� a: Number of component carriers (CC) in a frequency band. 16

� ��: scaling factor for the proportion of resources used in FDD UL 1

� �:Number of layers when multiple antennas are used in UL. 4

� :��: Scaling for the capability mismatch between baseband and RF. 1

� �� is the maximum modulation order. 8

� "�#$ is the maximum CR: 0.925

� µ is the numerology. 0

� B9 is the total OFDM symbol duration in seconds (Normal CP). 71.37 µs

� ;<=>>? is the maximum RB allocation in the effective BW. 270

� OH is the overhead. 0.0782

Peak data rate

23 �4 1 · 4 · 8 · 1 · 0.925 · 270 · 1271.37 · 10cd 1 C 0.0782 � 19.81efg[

�d

G�

Page 31: The 5G Infrastructure Association IMT2020: 5G PPP ... wwrf/meetings/past events... · The 5G Infrastructure Association 27/10/2018 1 Werner Mohr Nokia, 5G PPP Evaluation Group Chair

31

FDD UL: Peak data rate [Analysis]

• Extrapolation to all configurations (Gbps) through two possible approaches:

� Maximum peak data rate for the maximum number of CC.

� Maximum peak data rate for the minimum number of CC that fulfil the IMT-2020 requirement.

Peak data rate

Freq. Band

Numerologyhi

SISO

hiMIMO

Number of CC

hiSISO + CA

hiMIMO + CA

FR10 0.30 1.23 16 4.95 19.811 0.62 2.51 16 10.05 40.222 0.61 2.47 16 9.88 39.55

IMT-2020 Required Value UL: 10 Gbps

Freq. Band

Numerologyhi

SISO

hiMIMO

Number of CC

hiSISO + CA

hiMIMO + CA

FR10 0.30 1.23 9 2.78 11.141 0.62 2.51 4 2.51 10.052 0.61 2.47 5 3.09 12.36

CA: Carrier aggregationCC: Component Carriers

Page 32: The 5G Infrastructure Association IMT2020: 5G PPP ... wwrf/meetings/past events... · The 5G Infrastructure Association 27/10/2018 1 Werner Mohr Nokia, 5G PPP Evaluation Group Chair

32

TDD UL: Peak data rate [Analysis] (SFI 31)

• Calculated as: Example:

� a: Number of component carriers (CC) in a frequency band. 16

� ��: scaling factor for the proportion of resources used in TDD UL1 0.6286

� υ is the number of layers when multiple antennas are used. 4

� :��: scaling for the capability mismatch between baseband and RF. 1

� �� is the maximum modulation order 8

� "�#$ is the maximum CR: 0.925

� µ is the numerology 0

� B9 is the OFDM symbol duration in seconds (Normal CP) 71.37 µs

� ;<=>>? is the maximum RB allocation in the whole BW 270

� OH is the overhead 0.1003

Peak data rate

23 �4 0.62 · 4 · 8 · 1 · 0.925 · 270 · 1271.37 · 10cd · 1 C 0.10 � 12.16efg[

�d

G�

1 Frame structure: UUUMDUUUMD, M frames with SFI: 31

Page 33: The 5G Infrastructure Association IMT2020: 5G PPP ... wwrf/meetings/past events... · The 5G Infrastructure Association 27/10/2018 1 Werner Mohr Nokia, 5G PPP Evaluation Group Chair

33

TDD UL: Peak data rate [Analysis] (SFI 31)

• Extrapolation to all configurations (Gbps) through two possible approaches:

� Maximum peak data rate for the maximum number of CC.

� Maximum peak data rate for the minimum number of CC that fulfil the IMT-2020 requirement.

Peak data rate

Freq. Band Numerologyhi

SISO

hiMIMO

Number of CChi

SISO + CA

hiMIMO + CA

FR10 0.19 0.76 14 2.66 10.631 0.38 1.54 7 2.70 10.812 0.38 1.52 7 2.66 10.67

FR22 0.74 2.96 4 2.96 11.853 1.48 5.94 2 2.97 11.88

IMT-2020 Required Value UL: 10 Gbps

Freq. Band Numerologyhi

SISO

hiMIMO

Number of CChi

SISO + CA

hiMIMO + CA

FR10 0.19 0.76 16 3.04 12.161 0.38 1.54 16 6.17 24.712 0.38 1.52 16 6.10 24.40

FR22 0.74 2.96 16 11.85 47.433 1.48 5.94 16 23.76 95.05

CA: Carrier aggregationCC: Component Carriers

Page 34: The 5G Infrastructure Association IMT2020: 5G PPP ... wwrf/meetings/past events... · The 5G Infrastructure Association 27/10/2018 1 Werner Mohr Nokia, 5G PPP Evaluation Group Chair

34

Peak spectral efficiency (DL) [Analysis]

• Calculated as the peak data rate normalized by carrier bandwidth (including frequency guard bands):

• FDD DL = 1, TDD DL: 0.7714.

• Maximum BW is considered for each numerology and FR.

• FDD DL TDD DL

Peak data rate

Frequency Band

Numerologyji (bit/s/Hz)

SISO

ji (bit/s/Hz)

MIMO

FR10 6.01 48.131 6.09 48.742 5.98 47.87

k3 �23

· lm

Frequency Band

Numerologyji (bit/s/Hz)

SISO

ji (bit/s/Hz)

MIMO

FR10 5.97 46.841 5.93 47.442 5.98 46.60

FR22 5.34 42.763 5.37 42.96

IMT-2020 Required Value DL: 30 bits/s/Hz

Page 35: The 5G Infrastructure Association IMT2020: 5G PPP ... wwrf/meetings/past events... · The 5G Infrastructure Association 27/10/2018 1 Werner Mohr Nokia, 5G PPP Evaluation Group Chair

35

Peak spectral efficiency (UL) [Analysis]

• Calculated as the peak data rate normalized by carrier bandwidth (including frequency guard bands):

• FDD UL = 1, TDD UL = 0.6286.

• Maximum BW is considered for each numerology and FR.

• FDD UL TDD UL

Peak spectral efficiency

k3 �23

· lm

Frequency Band

Numerologyji (bit/s/Hz)

SISO

ji (bit/s/Hz)

MIMO

FR10 6.19 24.761 6.28 25.142 6.17 24.71

IMT-2020 Required Value UL: 15 bits/s/Hz

Frequency Band

Numerologyji (bit/s/Hz)

SISO

ji (bit/s/Hz)

MIMO

FR10 6.04 24.171 6.14 24.572 6.06 24.26

FR22 5.89 23.573 5.90 23.62

Page 36: The 5G Infrastructure Association IMT2020: 5G PPP ... wwrf/meetings/past events... · The 5G Infrastructure Association 27/10/2018 1 Werner Mohr Nokia, 5G PPP Evaluation Group Chair

5G NR FDD Control plane latency

Ole Grøndalen

Telenor

Page 37: The 5G Infrastructure Association IMT2020: 5G PPP ... wwrf/meetings/past events... · The 5G Infrastructure Association 27/10/2018 1 Werner Mohr Nokia, 5G PPP Evaluation Group Chair

ITU-R M.2410:

• Control plane latency refers to the transition time from a most

“battery efficient” state (e.g. Idle state) to the start of

continuous data transfer (e.g. Active state).

• This requirement is defined for the purpose of evaluation in

the eMBB and URLLC usage scenarios.

• The minimum requirement for control plane latency is 20 ms.

Proponents are encouraged to consider lower control plane

latency, e.g. 10 ms.

Page 38: The 5G Infrastructure Association IMT2020: 5G PPP ... wwrf/meetings/past events... · The 5G Infrastructure Association 27/10/2018 1 Werner Mohr Nokia, 5G PPP Evaluation Group Chair

Considerations for 5G NR

• For 5G NR “a most battery efficient state” can mean the

RRC_INACTIVE as well as RRC_IDLE state.

• It will therefore be reasonable to do the latency calculations

starting with the UE in the RRC_INACTIVE state.

• The control plane latency will then be determined by the

duration of the RRC Connection Resume procedure.

Page 39: The 5G Infrastructure Association IMT2020: 5G PPP ... wwrf/meetings/past events... · The 5G Infrastructure Association 27/10/2018 1 Werner Mohr Nokia, 5G PPP Evaluation Group Chair

Transition time calculation

UE gNB

Random Access Preamble

Random Access Response

RRCConnectionResumeRequest

RRCConnectionResume

Latency assumptions

Worst-case delay due to RACH scheduling period: 1 TTI

Transmission of RACH Preamble: 1 TTI

Preamble detection and processing in gNB: 1 ms

Transmission of Random Access Response: 1 TTI

UE Processing Delay (decoding of scheduling grant, timing alignment and C-RNTI

assignment + L1 encoding of RRC Connection Request) : 1 ms

Transmission of RRC Connection Resume Request: 1 TTI

RRCConnectionResumeComplete

Processing delay in gNB (L2 and RRC): 3 ms

Transmission of RRC Connection Resume (and UL grant): 1 TTI

Processing delay in the UE (L2 and RRC): 3 ms

Transmission of RRC Connection Resume Complete : 1 TTI

The UE and gNB processing delays dominate.

Values used are based on those proposed in R2-1812009 and R2-1812253

Page 40: The 5G Infrastructure Association IMT2020: 5G PPP ... wwrf/meetings/past events... · The 5G Infrastructure Association 27/10/2018 1 Werner Mohr Nokia, 5G PPP Evaluation Group Chair

Numerical examples

Δf 15 kHz 60 kHz 240 kHz

#OFDM symbols

per TTI

14 7 2 14 7 2 14 7 2

TTI [ms] 1 0.5 0.143 0.25 0.125 0.0357 0.0625 0.0312 0.00893

CP latency [ms] 14 11 8.86 9.5 8.75 8.21 8.38 8.19 8.05

• With the UE and gNB processing delay assumptions given, the

20 ms control plane latency requirement is satisfied in all cases.

• The results are only indicative until the UE and gNB processing

delays are specified in TS 38.331.

Page 41: The 5G Infrastructure Association IMT2020: 5G PPP ... wwrf/meetings/past events... · The 5G Infrastructure Association 27/10/2018 1 Werner Mohr Nokia, 5G PPP Evaluation Group Chair

Conclusions

4127/10/2018

Page 42: The 5G Infrastructure Association IMT2020: 5G PPP ... wwrf/meetings/past events... · The 5G Infrastructure Association 27/10/2018 1 Werner Mohr Nokia, 5G PPP Evaluation Group Chair

Conclusion

4227/10/2018

• Evaluation requires substantial technical work for• analytic evaluation• simulations and• inspection

• 5G PPP is supporting independent evaluation by several projects and members of 5G Infrastructure Association

• First evaluation characteristics investigated based on available information

• Focus on 3GPP submission to ITU-R

• ITU-R requirements met for• Peak data rate• Peak spectral efficiency• Bandwidth• Supported spectrum band(s)/range(s) meet

• Simulations under preparation• Several characteristics require additional information from SDOs

Source: 5G Infrastructure Association.

Page 43: The 5G Infrastructure Association IMT2020: 5G PPP ... wwrf/meetings/past events... · The 5G Infrastructure Association 27/10/2018 1 Werner Mohr Nokia, 5G PPP Evaluation Group Chair

27/10/2018 43

Thank you for your

attention!

http://5g-ppp.eu