thailand grading system

GRADING

SYSTEM

THAILAND

North America

BBA International Program

CHULALONGKORN BUSINESS SCHOOL

THAILAND

BBA INTERNATIONAL PROGRAM

CHULALONGKORN BUSINESS SCHOOL 1

Grading System – North America

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. Canada .............................................................................................. 3

1.1 Hec Montreal .......................................................................... 3

1.2 McGill University ..................................................................... 3

1.3 Simon Fraser University .......................................................... 4

1.4 Queen’s University at Kingston ............................................... 4

1.5 University of British Columbia ................................................ 5

1.6 University of Calgary ............................................................... 5

1.7 University of Ottawa ............................................................... 6

1.8 University of Toronto .............................................................. 6

1.9 University of Victoria ............................................................... 7

1.10 York University ..................................................................... 7

2. United States of America .................................................................. 8

2.1 Baruch College, The City University of New York (CUNY) ....... 8

2.2 California State University at Fresno ...................................... 8

2.3 Grand Valley State University ................................................. 8

2.4 New York University (NYU) ..................................................... 9

2.5 Michigan State University (MSU) ............................................ 9

2.6 Oklahoma State University ..................................................... 9

2.7 Oregon State University ........................................................ 10

2.8 San Diego State University .................................................... 10

2.9 San Francisco State University .............................................. 11

2.10 San Jose State University ................................................... 11

2.11 University of Florida ........................................................... 11

2.12 University of Hawaii at Manoa ........................................... 12

2.13 University of Maryland ....................................................... 12




2.14 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill ........................ 13

2.15 University of Northern Colorado ........................................ 13

2.16 University of Southern California ....................................... 14

2.17 University of Wisconsin-Madison ...................................... 14




Each student should be assigned a single letter grade highlighted in

pink equivalent to C Chula grade at the end of each course by the

course instructor as following universities:

1. CANADA

1.1 HEC MONTREAL Numerical value/Mark Evaluation 4.3 A+ Exceptional 4.0 A

Excellent 3.7 A‐ 3.3 B+

Very good 3.0 B 2.7 B‐ 2.3 C+

Good 2.0 C 1.7 C‐

Fair 1.3 D+ 1.0 D 0 E Fail

1.2 MCGILL UNIVERSITY Grades Grade Points Numerical Scale A 4.0 85 – 100% A- 3.7 80 – 84% B+ 3.3 75 – 79% B 3.0 70 – 74% B- 2.7 65 – 69% C+ 2.3 60 – 64% C 2.0 55 – 59% D 1.0 50 – 54% F (Fail) 0 0 – 49%




1.3 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY Letter Grade Numerical Equivalent Definition A+ 4.33 Excellent A 4.00 A- 3.67 B+ 3.33 Good B 3.00 B- 2.67 C+ 2.33

Satisfactory C 2.00 C- 1.67 Marginal C- 1.67 D 1.00 F 0.00 Fail

1.4 QUEEN’S UNIVERSITY AT KINGSTON Grade Numerical Range Grade Point Equivalent A+ 90-100 4.3 A 85-89 4.0 A- 80-84 3.7 B+ 77-79 3.3 B 73-76 3.0 B- 70-72 2.7 C+ 67-69 2.3 C 63-66 2.0 C- 60-62 1.7 D+ 57-59 1.3 D 53-56 1.0 D- 50-52 0.7 F 49 and below 0.0




1.5 UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Percentage (%) Letter Grade 90-100 A+ 85-89 A 80-84 A- 76-79 B+ 72-75 B 68-71 B- 64-67 C+ 60-63 C 55-59 C- 50-54 D 0-49 F (Fail)

1.6 UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY Grade Grade Point Value Description A+ 4.00 Outstanding A 4.00 Excellent A- 3.70 B+ 3.30 B 3.00 Good B- 2.70 C+ 2.30 C 2.00 Satisfactory C- 1.70 D+ 1.30 D 1.00 Minimal pass F 0 Fail




1.7 UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA Letter grade Numerical value Percentage scale value A+ 10 90-100 A 9 85-89 A- 8 80-84 B+ 7 75-79 B 6 70-74 C+ 5 65-69 C 4 60-64 D+ 3 55-59 D 2 50-54 E 1 40-49* F 0 0-39

1.8 UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO Percentage Letter Grade Grade Point Value Grade Definition 90-100 A+ 4.0

Excellent 85-89 A 4.0 80-84 A- 3.7 77-79 B+ 3.3

Good 73-76 B 3.0 70-72 B- 2.7 67-69 C+ 2.3

Adequate 63-66 C 2.0 60-62 C- 1.7 57-59 D+ 1.3

Marginal 53-56 D 1.0 50-52 D- 0.7 0-49 F 0.0 Inadequate




1.9 UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA Grade Grade Point Value Percentage Description A+ 9 90 - 100 Exceptional Work A 8 85 - 89 Outstanding Work A- 7 80 - 84 Excellent Work B+ 6 77 - 79 Very good work B 5 73 - 76 Acceptable work that fulfills the

expectations of the course B- 4 70 - 72

Unacceptable work revealing some deficiencies in knowledge, understanding or techniques

C+ 3 65 - 69 C 2 60 - 64 D 1 50 - 59 F 0 0 - 49 Failing grade

1.10 YORK UNIVERSITY

From Percentage To Letter Grade Grade Point 90-100 A+ 9 80-89 A 8 75-79 B+ 7 70-74 B 6 65-69 C+ 5 60-64 C 4 55-59 D+ 3 50-54 D 2 40-49 E 1 0-39 F 0




2. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

2.1 BARUCH COLLEGE, THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK (CUNY) Letter Grades and Grade Point Equivalents A 4.0 93.0–100.0 A- 3.7 90.0–92.9 B+ 3.3 87.1–89.9 B 3.0 83.0–87.0 B- 2.7 80.0–82.9 C+ 2.3 77.1–79.9 C 2.0 73.0–77.0 C- 1.7 70.0–72.9 D+ 1.3 67.1–69.9 D 1.0 60.0–67.0 F 0.0 below 60.0

2.2 CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY AT FRESNO Grade Explanation Points A Excellent 4.0 B Good 3.0 C Average 2.0 D Passing 1.0 F Failing 0.0

2.3 GRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY Grade Quality Points A 4.0 A- 3.7 B+ 3.3 B 3.0 B- 2.7 C+ 2.3 C 2.0 C- 1.7 D+ 1.3 D 1.0 F 0.0




2.4 NEW YORK UNIVERSITY (NYU) Letter Grade Legend Quality Points A Excellent 4.0 A- Excellent 3.7 B+ Good 3.3 B Good 3.0 B- Good 2.7 C+ Satisfactory 2.3 C Satisfactory 2.0 C- Satisfactory 1.7 D+ Minimum Passing Grade 1.3 D Minimum Passing Grade 1.0 F Failure 0.0

2.5 MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY (MSU) The Numerical System 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.0

2.6 OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY Grade Note Point/Hour A Excellent 4 B Good 3 C Average 2 D Below average 1 F Failure 0




2.7 OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY Grade Grade Points Notation A 4.0 Exceptional A- 3.7 B+ 3.3 B 3.0 Superior B- 2.7 C+ 2.3 C 2.0 Average C- 1.7 D+ 1.3 D 1.0 Inferior D- 0.7 F 0.0 Failure

2.8 SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY Grade Points A 4.0 A- 3.7 B+ 3.3 B 3.0 B- 2.7 C+ 2.3 C 2.0 C- 1.7 D+ 1.3 D 1.0 D- 0.7 F 0.0




2.9 SAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIVERSITY Grade Points A 4.0 A- 3.7 B+ 3.3 B 3.0 B- 2.7 C+ 2.3 C 2.0 C- 1.7 D+ 1.3 D 1.0 D- 0.7 F 0.0

2.10 SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY Grade Symbol Grade Value A+ 4.0 A 4.0 A- 3.7 B+ 3.3 B 3.0 B- 2.7 C+ 2.3 C 2.0 C- 1.7 D+ 1.3 D 1.0 D- 0.7 F 0

2.11 UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA Passing Grade A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- D+ D D- S

Grade Points 4.0 3.67 3.33 3.0 2.67 2.33 2.0 1.67 1.33 1.0 0.67 0




2.12 UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA

Letter Grade Grade Points A+ 4.0 A 4.0 A- 3.7 B+ 3.3 B 3.0 B- 2.7 C+ 2.3 C 2.0 C- 1.7 D+ 1.3 D 1.0 D- 0.7 F - 0.0

2.13 UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND Grade Grade Policy A+, A 4.0 A- 3.7 B+ 3.3 B 3.0 B- 2.7 C+ 2.3 C 2.0 C- 1.7 D+ 1.3 D 1.0 D- 0.7 F 0.0




2.14 UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL

Grade points A 4.0 A- 3.7 B+ 3.3 B 3.0 B- 2.7 C+ 2.3 C 2.0 C- 1.7 D+ 1.3 D 1.0 F 0.0

2.15 UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN COLORADO

Standard Grading Quality Points A = superior 4.00 A- = A minus 3.67 B+ = B plus 3.34 B = above average 3.00 B- = B minus 2.67 C+ = C plus 2.34 C = average 2.00 C- = C minus 1.67 D+ = D plus 1.34 D = poor, passing 1.00 D- = D minus, passing 0.67 F = failure 0.00




2.16 UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Letter Grade Grade Point A 4.0 A- 3.7 B+ 3.3 B 3.0 B- 2.7 C+ 2.3 C 2.0 C- 1.7 D+ 1.3 D 1.0 D- 0.7 F 0.0

2.17 UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON Grade Grade Points Per Credit A (Excellent) 4 AB (Intermediate grade) 3.5 B (Good) 3 BC (Intermediate grade) 2.5 C (Fair) 2 D (Poor) 1 F (Failure, see section below) 0

thailand grading system

Documents