temecula medical center - engr.psu.edu › ae › thesis › portfolios › 2009... · temecula...

4/27/2009

1

TEMECULA MEDICAL CENTER

TEMECULA, CA

“STRUCTURAL SYSTEM OPTIMIZATION”IMAGE COUTESY OF THE HKS INC.

SEAN BEVILLE STRUCTURAL OPTIONADVISOR: PROF. BOOTHBY

APRIL 13, 2009

“STRUCTURAL SYSTEM OPTIMIZATION”

THE DEPARTMENT OF ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERINGAT

THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY

PRESENTATION OUTLINETHESIS GOALS

BUILDING INTRODUCTION

STRUCTURAL DEPTH• STRUCTURE CHANGES

GRAVITY/LATERAL

PRESENTATION OUTLINEPRESENTATION OUTLINE

THESIS GOALS

BUILDING INTRO

STRUCTURAL DEPTH

• GRAVITY/LATERAL• RECOMMENDATIONS

CM BREADTH• INTRODUCTION• COMPARISONS• RECOMMENDATIONS

ARCHITECTURAL BREADTH• FAÇADE CHANGES

CM BREADTH

ARCHITECTURAL BREADTH

SUMMARY&

RECOMMENDATIONS

THANK YOU

QUESTIONS


APRIL 13, 2009

FAÇADE CHANGES• SUNLIGHT CHANGES• RECOMMENDATIONS

RECAP & FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS

QUESTIONS

4/27/2009

2

THESIS GOALS

Analysis existing conditions/surrounding regionPRESENTATION OUTLINE

THESIS GOALSTHESIS GOALS

BUILDING INTRO

STRUCTURAL DEPTH Optimize new steel structureCM BREADTH


SUMMARY&

RECOMMENDATIONS

THANK YOU

QUESTIONS

Optimize new steel structure

Analyze construction feasibility

of new system

Enhance exterior architecture


APRIL 13, 2009



PRESENTATION OUTLINE

THESIS GOALS

BUILDING INTROBUILDING INTRO

STRUCTURAL DEPTH

LOCATION

Temecula, California33.5°N 117.1°W

CM BREADTH


SUMMARY&

RECOMMENDATIONS

THANK YOU

QUESTIONS


APRIL 13, 2009

4/27/2009

3



THESIS GOALS


STRUCTURAL DEPTH

EXISTING CONDITIONS

Lateral System

Concrete Shear Walls 24” ThickCM BREADTH


SUMMARY&

RECOMMENDATIONS

THANK YOU

QUESTIONS

Floor System

- Concrete Flat-Plate System

- 2-Story D&T Pre-Stressed Double-Tees

- Concrete Shear Walls 24 Thick

- Compressive Strength f’c, 7000 psi


APRIL 13, 2009



THESIS GOALS


STRUCTURAL DEPTH

EXISTING CONDITIONS

Roof System

- 16 Ga Composite Steel Deck

CM BREADTH


SUMMARY&

RECOMMENDATIONS

THANK YOU

QUESTIONS

- 4 ½” Concrete Slab

Foundation

- Drilled Piers 42” Diameter

- Spread Footings 5’x5’ to 18’x18’

Columns


APRIL 13, 2009

- 26”x26” cast-in-place

- Reinforced with #9 and #6 bars

4/27/2009

4



THESIS GOALS


STRUCTURAL DEPTH

BUILDING FUNCTIONS – 295,000 sq. ft.

Floor 1

- Entrance – ER – Exam Rooms

CM BREADTH


SUMMARY&

RECOMMENDATIONS

THANK YOU

QUESTIONS

Floors 2-3

- Intensive Care Unit (ICU) – Exam Rooms – Offices

Floors 4-6

- Patient Rooms – Offices – Nurse Stations


APRIL 13, 2009

STRUCTURAL DEPTH STUDY


THESIS GOALS

BUILDING INTRO

STRUCTURAL DEPTHSTRUCTURAL DEPTH

OPTIMIZED SYSTEMS USING RAM STRUCTURAL SYSTEM

Floor System

l l lCM BREADTH


SUMMARY&

RECOMMENDATIONS

THANK YOU

QUESTIONS

- Flat-plate to composite steel

- Concrete columns to steel columns

Lateral System

- Concrete shear walls to steel braced frames


APRIL 13, 2009

4/27/2009

5



THESIS GOALS

BUILDING INTRO


OPTIMIZED SYSTEMS

Composite Steel System

S l C lCM BREADTH


SUMMARY&

RECOMMENDATIONS

THANK YOU

QUESTIONS

- Steel Columns

- 27’x26’ Typical Bays

Lateral System

- Concentric Diagonal Bracing

M t F


APRIL 13, 2009

- Moment Frames

- HSS Steel Shapes



THESIS GOALS

BUILDING INTRO


FLOOR LAYOUT

Typical Layout

- W18 Girders W16 JoistsCM BREADTH


SUMMARY&

RECOMMENDATIONS

THANK YOU

QUESTIONS

W18 Girders, W16 Joists

- 6” Slab (4” above deck)


APRIL 13, 2009

4/27/2009

6



THESIS GOALS

BUILDING INTRO


COLUMN LAYOUT

Typical Layout

- W10x33 → W12x79CM BREADTH


SUMMARY&

RECOMMENDATIONS

THANK YOU

QUESTIONS

W10x33 → W12x79

- Limited to W10 when possible


APRIL 13, 2009



THESIS GOALS

BUILDING INTRO


LATERAL SYSTEM

Diagonal Bracing

HSS 14”x6”x3/8”CM BREADTH


SUMMARY&

RECOMMENDATIONS

THANK YOU

QUESTIONS

- HSS 14 x6 x3/8

- Concentric

Moment Frames

- W12 x 50/87


APRIL 13, 2009

4/27/2009

7



THESIS GOALS

BUILDING INTRO


LATERAL SYSTEM

Typical Chevron Bracing

CM BREADTH


SUMMARY&

RECOMMENDATIONS

THANK YOU

QUESTIONS

- Consistent member contribution

- Adequate deflections < 3.3”

X‐Direction Y‐DirectionControlled by Seismic Controlled by Seismic

Story Story Drift Displacement Story Drift Displacement6 0.68 3.12 0.51 2.795 0.64 2.51 0.48 2.23


APRIL 13, 2009

4 0.64 1.95 0.48 1.713 0.61 1.39 0.45 1.192 0.52 0.86 0.37 0.711 0.49 0.41 0.31 0.32



THESIS GOALS

BUILDING INTRO


LAYOUT MODIFICATIONS

Typical Floors

CM BREADTH


SUMMARY&

RECOMMENDATIONS

THANK YOU

QUESTIONS

- Floor-to-floor heights increased by 12”

- Column sizes smaller = more space

- Thinner lateral-structure


APRIL 13, 2009

4/27/2009

8



THESIS GOALS

BUILDING INTRO


RESULTS & RECOMMENDATIONS

Floor System

CM BREADTH


SUMMARY&

RECOMMENDATIONS

THANK YOU

QUESTIONS

- Explore slab – joist combinations

- Non – composite system

Lateral System

- Eccentric bracing

- Fewer/larger steel braces


APRIL 13, 2009

CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT BREADTH


THESIS GOALS

BUILDING INTRO

STRUCTURAL DEPTH

MATERIAL TAKEOFFS

Existing System

CM BREADTHCM BREADTH


SUMMARY&

RECOMMENDATIONS

THANK YOU

QUESTIONS

- R.S. Means estimates

- Typical concrete construction

Steel Re-design

- RAM Structural System

- Weight takeoffs


APRIL 13, 2009

4/27/2009

9



THESIS GOALS

BUILDING INTRO

STRUCTURAL DEPTH

MATERIAL & LABOR COSTS

R.S. Means – 2008



SUMMARY&

RECOMMENDATIONS

THANK YOU

QUESTIONS

Assumptions

- Steel - $0.50/lb

Takeoffs from 4 Groups

Columns


APRIL 13, 2009

Slabs

Shear walls – Diagonal Bracing

Crane/Equipment



THESIS GOALS

BUILDING INTRO

STRUCTURAL DEPTH

COSTS

3%

Steel Redesign

2%

Concrete Original



SUMMARY&

RECOMMENDATIONS

THANK YOU

QUESTIONS

63%

34%

Materials: 1,473,226Labor: 779,298Equipment: 62,283

52%46%

Materials: 1,990,893Labor: 1,756,787Equipment: 99,763

TOTAL – $3.8 Million TOTAL – $2.3 Million


APRIL 13, 2009

TOTAL SAVINGS – $1.53 Million

$5.2/sq. ft.

4/27/2009

10



THESIS GOALS

BUILDING INTRO

STRUCTURAL DEPTH

SCHEDULING

Concrete Existing Steel Re-Design



SUMMARY&

RECOMMENDATIONS

THANK YOU

QUESTIONS

261 Days 208 Days

Savings

53 Days


APRIL 13, 2009

2.7 Months

@ $60,000/Month = $198,000 in scheduling savings



THESIS GOALS

BUILDING INTRO

STRUCTURAL DEPTH

CONCLUSIONS

Total Savings

$1 53 Million ($5 2/sq ft )CM BREADTHCM BREADTH


SUMMARY&

RECOMMENDATIONS

THANK YOU

QUESTIONS

- $1.53 Million ($5.2/sq. ft.)

Additional Savings

- Scheduling impact

- Early move-in, Foundations

Disadvantages of Steel

Lead time


APRIL 13, 2009

- Lead time

- Increased height

- Staging area

4/27/2009

11



THESIS GOALS

BUILDING INTRO

STRUCTURAL DEPTH

CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS

Composite Steel Is Viable



SUMMARY&

RECOMMENDATIONS

THANK YOU

QUESTIONS

Flexible Savings

Further Investigation Recommended


APRIL 13, 2009



THESIS GOALS

BUILDING INTRO

STRUCTURAL DEPTH

OPTIMIZED SYSTEMS

Existing Condition

CM BREADTH

ARCHITECTURAL ARCHITECTURAL BREADTHBREADTH

SUMMARY&

RECOMMENDATIONS

THANK YOU

QUESTIONS

- Plaster façade

- Minimal window coverage

Re-Design

- Predominantly glass

- Extensions for shade LIFE SCIENCES BUILDING


APRIL 13, 2009

4/27/2009

12



THESIS GOALS

BUILDING INTRO

STRUCTURAL DEPTH

OPTIMIZED SYSTEMS

Glass Façade Re-Design

CM BREADTH


SUMMARY&

RECOMMENDATIONS

THANK YOU

QUESTIONS

- Regional architecture

- Sun study

- Penn State study


APRIL 13, 2009

HEALTH SERVICES BUILDING



THESIS GOALS

BUILDING INTRO

STRUCTURAL DEPTH

OPTIMIZED SYSTEMS

Glass Façade Re-Design

9° lCM BREADTH


SUMMARY&

RECOMMENDATIONS

THANK YOU

QUESTIONS

- 79° sun angle

- 8’ windows


APRIL 13, 2009

4/27/2009

13



THESIS GOALS

BUILDING INTRO

STRUCTURAL DEPTH

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

New architectural approach for regionCM BREADTH


SUMMARY&

RECOMMENDATIONS

THANK YOU

QUESTIONS

New architectural approach for region

Increased sunlight → heat

Less efficient than original design


APRIL 13, 2009

Further investigation not recommended

SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONS


THESIS GOALS

BUILDING INTRO

STRUCTURAL DEPTH

GOALS

Analysis existing conditions/surrounding region

Existing conditions explored and verifiedCM BREADTH


SUMMARYSUMMARY&&

RECOMMENDATIONSRECOMMENDATIONS

THANK YOU

QUESTIONS

Systems studied for comparison

Optimize new steel structure

Re-designed steel member sizes determined

More efficient lateral system


APRIL 13, 2009

Further investigation recommended

4/27/2009

14

SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONS


THESIS GOALS

BUILDING INTRO

STRUCTURAL DEPTH

GOALS

Analyze construction feasibility of new system

Steel system very efficientCM BREADTH


SUMMARYSUMMARY&&

RECOMMENDATIONSRECOMMENDATIONS

THANK YOU

QUESTIONS

Lower final costs and construction times

Further investigation recommended


Adds appeal to region

Allows more incoming light


APRIL 13, 2009

g g

Original design – more efficient operating costs

Further investigation not recommended

THANK YOU


THESIS GOALS

BUILDING INTRO

STRUCTURAL DEPTH

Special thanks to

CM BREADTH


SUMMARY&

RECOMMENDATIONS

THANK YOUTHANK YOU

QUESTIONS

HKS Inc.

Penn State University

Prof. Parfitt

Prof. Holland

Prof. Boothby


APRIL 13, 2009

Friends and Family

4/27/2009

15

QUESTIONS


THESIS GOALS

BUILDING INTRO

STRUCTURAL DEPTH

CM BREADTH


SUMMARY&

RECOMMENDATIONS

THANK YOU

QUESTIONSQUESTIONS

QUESTIONS?


APRIL 13, 2009

temecula medical center - engr.psu.edu › ae › thesis › portfolios › 2009... · temecula...

Documents