telecommunication engineering arjan meijerink te presentation – may 29, 2012
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Telecommunication Engineering Arjan Meijerink TE Presentation – May 29, 2012](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062423/56649e355503460f94b236f4/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Telecommunication Engineering
Arjan Meijerink
TE Presentation – May 29, 2012
![Page 2: Telecommunication Engineering Arjan Meijerink TE Presentation – May 29, 2012](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062423/56649e355503460f94b236f4/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Education at the UT – new curriculum ; tasks of PhDs; tasks of supervisors Mark Bentum
![Page 3: Telecommunication Engineering Arjan Meijerink TE Presentation – May 29, 2012](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062423/56649e355503460f94b236f4/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
Assessment of EE curriculum
2010 Good quality (BSc/MSc)
But All EE curricula failed in effectiveness Possibly talent is lost… The reaction on effectiveness and duration is rather phlegmatic
In coming years serious efforts are expected to improve the success !!
![Page 4: Telecommunication Engineering Arjan Meijerink TE Presentation – May 29, 2012](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062423/56649e355503460f94b236f4/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
Causes of the delay
Some courses might ask too much Many assignments take substantionally longer time than
scheduled Decision for the fitting master program causes delays
Main point: student have priorities of their own choice
![Page 5: Telecommunication Engineering Arjan Meijerink TE Presentation – May 29, 2012](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062423/56649e355503460f94b236f4/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
Problems in the assignments
We observe the following:
Huge delays in the projects - often ~1 year. Responsibilities are not always clear Poor background in writing …
…and in structuring research
![Page 6: Telecommunication Engineering Arjan Meijerink TE Presentation – May 29, 2012](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062423/56649e355503460f94b236f4/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
Conclusions
Tell you about the new Electrical Engineering curriculum and the rational behind it.
Show you that the duration of the assignment is one of the main problems. This is also the case for PhD projects.
Show you the structure of assignments. Tell you about a career in science. Give you some tips and expectations
Open issues: How to write a paper/report/thesis How to structure research
![Page 7: Telecommunication Engineering Arjan Meijerink TE Presentation – May 29, 2012](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062423/56649e355503460f94b236f4/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Telecommunication Engineering
Arjan Meijerink
TE Presentation – May 29, 2012
in
Some practical hints for preparingreports, papers and presentations
![Page 8: Telecommunication Engineering Arjan Meijerink TE Presentation – May 29, 2012](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062423/56649e355503460f94b236f4/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
(8)Outline
1. Motivation2. Proficient communication3. Some myths & facts about writing4. Preparation5. The actual writing6. Revision7. Other forms of communication8. Conclusion
![Page 9: Telecommunication Engineering Arjan Meijerink TE Presentation – May 29, 2012](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062423/56649e355503460f94b236f4/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
(9)Outline
1. Motivation2. Proficient communication3. Some myths & facts about writing4. Preparation5. The actual writing6. Revision7. Other forms of communication8. Conclusion
![Page 10: Telecommunication Engineering Arjan Meijerink TE Presentation – May 29, 2012](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062423/56649e355503460f94b236f4/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
(10)2. Proficient communication
Communication should be effective efficient acceptable
and this is determined by factors such as goal
audience
boundary conditions
e.g. knowledge transfer, seeking feedback,building reputation, convincing (!), entertainment
relation? knowledge? attitude/opinion?culture? goals? (!)
i.e. form (written/oral), length, house style, tools, time for preparation, etc.
![Page 11: Telecommunication Engineering Arjan Meijerink TE Presentation – May 29, 2012](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062423/56649e355503460f94b236f4/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
(11)Outline
1. Motivation2. Proficient communication3. Some myths & facts about writing4. Preparation5. The actual writing6. Revision7. Other forms of communication8. Conclusion
![Page 12: Telecommunication Engineering Arjan Meijerink TE Presentation – May 29, 2012](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062423/56649e355503460f94b236f4/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
(12)3. Some myths & facts about writing (1)
MythWriting is a matter of
talent personal taste inspiration choosing the proper words and sentences following a procedure with a predefined order ‘first time right’
![Page 13: Telecommunication Engineering Arjan Meijerink TE Presentation – May 29, 2012](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062423/56649e355503460f94b236f4/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
(13)
Facts Writing is like solving a problem There are good and bad approaches Being a proficient writer is mostly a matter of attitude The writing process consists of subprocesses:
o planning o data collection and orderingo text formulation and formattingo revising
Good writers spend relatively much time on planning, and revise more often and more thoroughly
3. Some myths & facts about writing (2)
![Page 14: Telecommunication Engineering Arjan Meijerink TE Presentation – May 29, 2012](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062423/56649e355503460f94b236f4/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
(14)
smugness rigidity
resistance against rational and systematic approach
disregard of audience
postponing exaggerated perfection
overcompletenes
self-criticism professionalism reflection systematics
empathy inner dialog with reader go ahead! revision satisfaction with imperfect selectivity and focus
3. Some myths & facts about writing (3)
![Page 15: Telecommunication Engineering Arjan Meijerink TE Presentation – May 29, 2012](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062423/56649e355503460f94b236f4/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
(15)Outline
1. Motivation2. Proficient communication3. Some myths & facts about writing4. Preparation5. The actual writing6. Revision7. Other forms of communication8. Conclusion
![Page 16: Telecommunication Engineering Arjan Meijerink TE Presentation – May 29, 2012](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062423/56649e355503460f94b236f4/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
(16)4. Preparation (1)
Task orientation Goal? main purpose/message? limitations? Readers? goals? knowledge? shadow readers? Boundary conditions:
oon the product? format, length, illustrations?oon the proces? deadline(s), sources, help, tools?
Examples: Paper in IEEE Transactions Article in Scintilla’s magazine “De Vonk” Project proposal for STW
![Page 17: Telecommunication Engineering Arjan Meijerink TE Presentation – May 29, 2012](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062423/56649e355503460f94b236f4/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
(17)4. Preparation (2)
Determining contents and order What is the main question to be answered? How to organize this in subquestions?
Common in engineering science: problem structureoWhat is the problem to be solved? goal/question oWhy is it a problem? motivation/relevanceoWhat is the cause? technical background/analysisoWhat is the solution? conclusion/answer
What is the proper detail level?Collecting data: Literature
Research results
![Page 18: Telecommunication Engineering Arjan Meijerink TE Presentation – May 29, 2012](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062423/56649e355503460f94b236f4/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
(18)Outline
1. Motivation2. Proficient communication3. Some myths & facts about writing4. Preparation5. The actual writing6. Revision7. Other forms of communication8. Conclusion
![Page 19: Telecommunication Engineering Arjan Meijerink TE Presentation – May 29, 2012](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062423/56649e355503460f94b236f4/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
(19)5. The actual writing (1)
Outline Title Authors Division in chapters, (sub)sections, (sub)paragraphs Abstract/summary References Appendices Writing style & layout Acronyms & symbols Figures & tables Equations
![Page 20: Telecommunication Engineering Arjan Meijerink TE Presentation – May 29, 2012](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062423/56649e355503460f94b236f4/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
(20)5. The actual writing (2)
Titlepurposes:
structuringo themeo keywordso type of text
motivating
possible approach: title – subtitle
be creative…e.g. review, comparison, analysis, …
![Page 21: Telecommunication Engineering Arjan Meijerink TE Presentation – May 29, 2012](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062423/56649e355503460f94b236f4/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Telecommunication Engineering
Arjan Meijerink
TE Presentation – May 29, 2012
in
Some practical hints for preparingreports, papers and presentations
![Page 22: Telecommunication Engineering Arjan Meijerink TE Presentation – May 29, 2012](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062423/56649e355503460f94b236f4/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
(22)5. The actual writing (3)
Authors anybody who had a scientific contribution to content,
i.e. novel technical idea, reasoning, approach, …i.e. not for:
technical assistance/measurement/production explaining background material editorial assistance
Order? often: student(s), advisor(s),
…, supervisorAll authors are responsible for contents
acknowledgment
including author list!
![Page 23: Telecommunication Engineering Arjan Meijerink TE Presentation – May 29, 2012](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062423/56649e355503460f94b236f4/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
(23)5. The actual writing (4)
Division in chapters, (sub)sections, (sub)paragraphs (1)1. Introduction
Opening Scope: goal/question Outline
Not: Personal background Acknowledgment Technical details
Preface/epilogue/footnote
Chapter/Section 2 !
Wide field
Topic
Funnel openingNovelty?
Descriptive! Logical?Related work?
Motivation!
![Page 24: Telecommunication Engineering Arjan Meijerink TE Presentation – May 29, 2012](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062423/56649e355503460f94b236f4/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
(24)5. The actual writing (5)
Division in chapters, (sub)sections, (sub)paragraphs (2)x. Conclusion(s) (and recommendations)
Goal achieved?or: answer to research question
Future perspective, e.g.oapplicationso relation to future work ocall to action
Not: summary
Remaining chapters/sections: support of conclusion
Abstract !
Connect to introduction!
![Page 25: Telecommunication Engineering Arjan Meijerink TE Presentation – May 29, 2012](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062423/56649e355503460f94b236f4/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
(25)5. The actual writing (6)
Division in chapters, (sub)sections, (sub)paragraphs (3)
Example 1:1. Introduction2. Technical background/analysis3. Research approach4. Results5. Conclusions
Example 2:1. Introduction2. Problem analysis3. Problem 14. Problem 25. Problem 36. Overall conclusionSections as in Example 1
Conventional!
Balance overview/logic vs. overkill vs. esthetics
![Page 26: Telecommunication Engineering Arjan Meijerink TE Presentation – May 29, 2012](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062423/56649e355503460f94b236f4/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
(26)5. The actual writing (7)
Abstract/summary Summary of context, scope, support, conclusion Typically
o1–2 pages, ~1 paragraph/chapter (report) o1 paragraph, 1–3 lines/section (paper)
So distinguish between: Preface: personal notes etc. outside scope Introduction: context, scope, outline Conclusion: evaluation/answer Abstract: context, scope, support, conclusion
![Page 27: Telecommunication Engineering Arjan Meijerink TE Presentation – May 29, 2012](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062423/56649e355503460f94b236f4/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
(27)5. The actual writing (8)
References Not: list of consulted or recommended material Purpose: honor / support / context Form: quote / summary / citation Descriptive & traceable (complete!) In order of citation
[4] http://www.utwente.nl/ewi/te/
Better: [4] Web site of the Telecommunication Engineering Group at the University of Twente,http://www.utwente.nl/ewi/te/.
refer!
![Page 28: Telecommunication Engineering Arjan Meijerink TE Presentation – May 29, 2012](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062423/56649e355503460f94b236f4/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
(28)5. The actual writing (9)
AppendicesAnything that is relevant but not essential for understanding
e.g. raw data, mathematical proof, source codeor at least not for every reader
e.g. summary background knowledge
refer!
![Page 29: Telecommunication Engineering Arjan Meijerink TE Presentation – May 29, 2012](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062423/56649e355503460f94b236f4/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
(29)5. The actual writing (10)
Writing style & layout be specific and precise be punctual (spelling & layout) be consistent follow conventions
Acronyms & symbols Introduced once, upon first occurrence
Exception: abstract Abbreviated words not capitalized. Exception: names
The probability density function (PDF) is given by […]. From this PDF it follows that …
![Page 30: Telecommunication Engineering Arjan Meijerink TE Presentation – May 29, 2012](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062423/56649e355503460f94b236f4/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
(30)5. The actual writing (11)
Figures & tables Purpose: illustration, support, attraction, esthetics Should explain (not be explained) Should not contain more information than needed
e.g. graphs Independent var. on x axis; dependent var. on y axis Clearly define variables and units Scales: illustrative and consistent
refer!
![Page 31: Telecommunication Engineering Arjan Meijerink TE Presentation – May 29, 2012](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062423/56649e355503460f94b236f4/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
(31)
What could be improved?
Figure 5.3: Measurement of the RC filter. The measurement matches well with the theory.
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1000
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
time [s]
v
olta
ge [
V]
theory
measurement
?small…
dashed lines do not make sense…
in text!
![Page 32: Telecommunication Engineering Arjan Meijerink TE Presentation – May 29, 2012](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062423/56649e355503460f94b236f4/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
(32)
Better..
Figure 5.3: Theoretical and measured output voltage of the RC filteras a function of time
0 20 40 60 80 1000
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
time [s]
v
olta
ge
[V]
theorymeasurement
![Page 33: Telecommunication Engineering Arjan Meijerink TE Presentation – May 29, 2012](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062423/56649e355503460f94b236f4/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
(33)5. The actual writing (11)
Figures & tables Purpose: illustration, support, attraction, esthetics Should explain (not be explained) Should not contain more information than needed
e.g. graphs Independent var. on x axis; dependent var. on y axis Clearly define variables and units Scales: illustrative and consistent
Captions Below figure or above table Should only describe what is there (no interpretation!)
refer!
![Page 34: Telecommunication Engineering Arjan Meijerink TE Presentation – May 29, 2012](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062423/56649e355503460f94b236f4/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
(34)5. The actual writing (12)
Equations are part of the sentence should be written in well-defined symbols
The voltage is given by […], in which …
italic Roman (not italic) variables x, V function names f (x) indices ai
operators/parentheses + > (.)
common functions cos(x) words/acronyms Vout(t) numbers and units 1 cm vectors: boldlowercase v matrices: bold uppercaseM
![Page 35: Telecommunication Engineering Arjan Meijerink TE Presentation – May 29, 2012](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062423/56649e355503460f94b236f4/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
(35)Outline
1. Motivation2. Proficient communication3. Some myths & facts about writing4. Preparation5. The actual writing6. Revision7. Other forms of communication8. Conclusion
![Page 36: Telecommunication Engineering Arjan Meijerink TE Presentation – May 29, 2012](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062423/56649e355503460f94b236f4/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
(36)6. Revision Write in rounds: first rough contents, then details Proofread
o Is the main question answered?oAre order and detail level appropriate?o Is everything consistent?oAre boundary conditions met?o…
(Make notes during writing!) Reconsider focus/structure/audience Kill your darlings! Let others (co-authors?) review Instruct them
![Page 37: Telecommunication Engineering Arjan Meijerink TE Presentation – May 29, 2012](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062423/56649e355503460f94b236f4/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
(37)Outline
1. Motivation2. Proficient communication3. Some myths & facts about writing4. Preparation5. The actual writing6. Revision7. Other forms of communication8. Conclusion
![Page 38: Telecommunication Engineering Arjan Meijerink TE Presentation – May 29, 2012](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062423/56649e355503460f94b236f4/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
(38)7. Other forms of communication
PresentationsMain difference with report/paper?
perception by audience!i.e. more effort required on:
focus motivation completeness
Main difference oral/poster presentation?
Other examplesE-mails, phonecalls, meetings, …
clear presentation stressing important things …
![Page 39: Telecommunication Engineering Arjan Meijerink TE Presentation – May 29, 2012](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062423/56649e355503460f94b236f4/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
(39)8. Conclusion
Proper writing is mainly a matter ofbeing aware of your goal
and having the right attitude
…just like doing the actual research itself
(…and many other things you do in life).
Good luck writing…and advising others
how to do it!