technology readiness infrastructure grant overview
DESCRIPTION
Technology Readiness Infrastructure Grant Overview. www.22itrig.org. Technology Readiness in Michigan. Technology Readiness Infrastructure Grant Goals. Grant Structure. Funds Distribution. Category One: District Participation Awards. Category Two: - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
1
Technology Readiness Infrastructure Grant
Overview
October 16, 2013
Technology Readiness in Michigan
www.22itrig.org
2
Technology Readiness Infrastructure Grant
Goals
October 16, 2013
Statewide interconnected network to support reliable unencumbered access to
online assessments
Establish collective purchasing contracts for learning devices and online content
Leverage regional networks to facilitate consolidation and increase the level of network-based services available to all
regions
Build capacity to assist educators in planning and implementing the best practices and technology required to
support the next generation of assessment, teaching, and learning
3
Grant Structure
October 16, 2013
• District ParticipationCategory One:
• Consortium LeadershipCategory Two:
• Statewide ActivitiesCategory Three:
• District Consortium Confirmation
Category Four:
• Interconnecting ISDs and Districts
Category Five:
4
Funds Distribution
October 16, 2013
Funds to Local Districts and Consortia $15,905,400 • Categories One, Two, and Four
Funds to Activities $18,094,600• Category Three
Funds to Connectivity $16,000,000• Category Five
Total $50,000,000
5
Category One: District Participation Awards
October 16, 2013
$14,692,540.00 Total awards
Representing 1,469,254 students
96.1% of all students
56 ISDs
541 LEAs
136 PSAs
6
Greater Michigan Educational Consortium (Genesee ISD)
Intra-Michigan Technology Readiness Leadership Consortium (Wexford-Missaukee ISD)
Kent ISD Consortium (Kent ISD)
Rural Northern Michigan Consortium (Copper Country ISD)
Southwest Michigan Consortium (Kalamazoo RESA)
Consortia Map
Category Two: Consortium Leadership
October 16, 2013
www.22itrig.org
TRIG Structure
7October 16, 2013
MDE
TRIG Steering Committee
MAISA TRIG Operations
Office
IMTRLC GMEC Kent RNM SW
Project Director
Erate SEN MTRAx Classroom Readiness
Device Purchasing
Data Integration
Assessment & Curriculum
Erate Advisory SEN Advisory
MTRAx Advisory
Classroom ReadinessAdvisory
Device Purchasing
AdvisoryData Integration
AdvisoryAssessment &
Curriculum Advisory
Erate PM SEN PM MTRAxPM
Classroom Readiness
PM
Device Purchasing
PMData Integration
PMAssessment &
Curriculum PM
Business and Communications Support
Evaluation (FSU)
Batch Geo
8October 16, 2013
9
Category Three:Statewide Activities
October 10, 2013
ConnectivityState Education Network (SEN)
Design
SEN Build
Collaborative ServicesData Systems
Integration
Device Purchasing
E-Rate
Professional Learning
Operations OfficeMI Technology
Readiness Assessment Tool (MTRAx)
Classroom Readiness
Assessment and Curriculum
10
Category Three:Statewide Activities
October 10, 2013
ConnectivityState Education Network (SEN)
Design
SEN Build
Collaborative ServicesData Systems
Integration
Device Purchasing
E-Rate
Professional Learning
Operations OfficeMI Technology
Readiness Assessment Tool (MTRAx)
Classroom Readiness
Assessment and Curriculum
11
Category Three:Statewide Activities
October 16, 2013
Connectivity:
State Education Network Design
Greater Michigan Educational ConsortiumGenesee ISD Awardee
Project Manager: Dave Childs
12
Connectivity: State Education Network
October 16, 2013
Outcomes
Clearly defined K-12 infrastructure assets
Data center collaboration and improved/efficient administrative
mechanisms for network integration and fiber sharing
13
Connectivity: State Education Network
October 16, 2013
Outcomes
Reduced fixed and support costs of network infrastructure
Set stage for collaboration with local municipal entities (network services/sharing)
14
Connectivity: State Education Network
Benefits to the Local Districts
October 16, 2013
Improved ability to respond quickly (virtual data centers/shared infrastructure) to changes in K-12 environment (competitive/regulatory/instruction)
Cost containment (economies of scale/specialization) in the face of growing demands for bandwidth and networks that make educational content sharing easier, mobile, and targeted
Districts can be more responsive to parent/student demands
15
MAEDS Conference
Check out the session on SEN▪ Friday, October 18, 2013▪ 9:00 a.m. – 10:00 a.m.▪ Presenter: Dave Childs, Greater Michigan Education Consortium
October 16, 2013
16
Category Three:Statewide Activities
October 10, 2013
ConnectivityState Education Network (SEN)
Design
SEN Build
Collaborative ServicesData Systems
Integration
Device Purchasing
E-Rate
Professional Learning
Operations OfficeMI Technology
Readiness Assessment Tool (MTRAx)
Classroom Readiness
Assessment and Curriculum
17
Category Three:Statewide Activities
October 16, 2013
Collaborative Services:
Data Systems Integration Intra-Michigan Technology Readiness
Leadership ConsortiumWexford-Missaukee ISD Awardee
Project Manager: Don Dailey
Activity Six: Data System Integration Infrastructure Pilot
Outcomes
Develop data hub architecture
Implement data hub hardware and software
Build connectors from data hub to a variety of data systems
18October 16, 2013
Activity Six: Data System Integration Infrastructure Pilot
Outcomes
Replicate datahubs regionally
Provide capability to aggregate data from regional datahubs
19October 16, 2013
Activity Six: Data System Integration Infrastructure Pilot
Benefits to the Local Districts
Eliminate redundant data entry and replace expensive data bridging services
Provide efficiencies as districts are able to work with more common systems
Serve as the basis for a personal learning architecture which could help to improve student achievement
20October 16, 2013
21October 16, 2013
Datahub Overview
Ed-Fi Datahub
ODSDatabase
Ed-Fi DatahubDashboardDatabase
DashboardApplication Third
PartyData
Warehouse
Com
mon
Exch
ange Fo
rmat
EdupointSynergy
InfiniteCampus
PearsonPowerScho
ol
MISTAR/Zangle
Skyward
ACT
Personal Learning
Architecture
DIBELSMEAPMME
SWIS
Library
FoodService
Transportation
Special Educatio
n
Report/QueryTools
Import Assessments Directly
Facilitate Integrations Directly
Reporting
SIS Integrati
ons
SunGardeSchoolPl
us
October 16, 2013 22
23
MAEDS Conference
Check out the session on Data Systems Integration ▪ Thursday, October 17, 2013▪ 1:30 p.m. – 2:30 p.m.▪ Presenter: Don Dailey, Kalamazoo RESA
October 16, 2013
24
Category Three:Statewide Activities
October 16, 2013
Collaborative Services:
Device PurchasingRural Northern Michigan Consortium
Copper Country ISD AwardeeProject Manager: Karen Hairston
25
Collaborative Services: Device Purchasing
October 16, 2013
Outcomes Develop equipment specifications for Personal Learning Devices and
have school districts/charter schools project potential
purchases
Prepare and issue an Invitation to Bid for Personal Learning Devices
26
Collaborative Services: Device Purchasing
October 16, 2013
Outcomes Develop specifications for desktop
computers and have school districts/charter schools project
potential purchases
Prepare and issue an Invitation to Bid for desktop computers
27
Collaborative Services: Device Purchasing
Benefits to the Local Districts
October 16, 2013
Aggregated demand purchasing
Adds value, such as Professional Development
Ease of making purchases
Collaborative Services: Device Purchasing
28October 16, 2013
54,831 Total
Devices
Purchased
Collaborative Services: Device Purchasing
29October 16, 2013
$9,587,474 Total Savings
Over Education
al List Price
Collaborative Services: Device Purchasing
Area: Amount:
Amount of PD $ 661,775.00
Amount of Incentive $ 5,000,000.00
Savings over educational list price
$ 9,587,474.00
TOTAL SAVINGS $15,249,249.00
30October 16, 2013
31
Category Three:Statewide Activities
October 16, 2013
Collaborative Services:
E-Rate
Intra-Michigan Technology Readiness Leadership Consortium
Wexford-Missaukee ISD Awardee
Project Manager: Bill Thompson
32
Collaborative Services: E-Rate
October 16, 2013
Outcomes
Design and implement a statewide bid for Internet
connectivityEstablish training for school staff and consultants that oversee the
USF process - will be ongoing and will integrate the statewide
bid process
33
Collaborative Services: E-Rate
October 16, 2013
Outcomes Develop state master contracts that districts can leverage to drive down
their cost of Wide Area Network (WAN) connectivity
Successful implementation and utilization should ensure that every
school has enough Internet bandwidth to take high stakes online assessments
34
Collaborative Services: E-Rate
Benefits to the Local Districts
October 16, 2013
Drive costs down as low as possible
Simplify E-rate filing
Make sure all legal assurances are met
Maximize E-rate to the most benefit
35
MAEDS Conference
Check out the session on E-Rate▪ Friday, October 18, 2013▪10:20 a.m. – 11:20 a.m.▪ Presenters: Jim Rarus, Wayne RESA & Josh Hayes, Wexford-Missaukee ISD
October 16, 2013
36
Category Three:Statewide Activities
October 10, 2013
ConnectivityState Education Network (SEN)
Design
SEN Build
Collaborative ServicesData Systems
Integration
Device Purchasing
E-Rate
Professional Learning
Operations OfficeMI Technology
Readiness Assessment Tool (MTRAx)
Classroom Readiness
Assessment and Curriculum
37
Category Three:Statewide Activities
October 16, 2013
Professional Learning:
Operations OfficeIntra-Michigan Technology
Readiness Leadership ConsortiumWexford-Missaukee ISD Awardee
Project Director: Tim Hall
38
Professional Learning:Operations Office
October 16, 2013
Partnership with MAISA and MIEM
Oversight of operations of grant
Oversight of Statewide Activities of grant
Evaluation of grant
39
Category Three:Statewide Activities
October 16, 2013
Professional Learning:Michigan Technology Readiness
Assessment Tool (MTRAx)Kent ISD Consortium
Kent ISD Awardee
Project Manager: Matt Lindner
40
Professional Learning:MI Technology Readiness Assessment Tool
October 16, 2013
Outcomes
Identify readiness for online assessments (network and device
readiness)
Provide on-demand reporting capability for readiness status
41
Professional Learning:MI Technology Readiness Assessment Tool
October 16, 2013
OutcomesProvide low effort data collection tools and processes for network
and device data
Feed data to Activity Three to assist in professional development
Enhanced MTRAx functionality to enable use of the application in
the development of district technology plans
42
Professional Learning: MI Technology Readiness Assessment Tool
Benefits to the Local Districts
October 16, 2013
Provide tech readiness data to all ISDs, LEAs, and PSAs in a manner that is easily updated and provides on-demand reporting of readiness status
Assist in the professional development process through the identification of training requirements as it relates to the technology used for online assessments
Provide a common platform for the development of tech plans that leverages the data already stored in MTRAx
43
Professional Learning: MI Technology Readiness Assessment Tool
October 16, 2013
44
MAEDS Conference
Check out the session on MTRAx▪ Thursday, October 17, 2013▪ 2:40 p.m. – 3:40 p.m.▪ Presenter: Matt Lindner, Plante & Moran
October 16, 2013
45
Category Three: Statewide Activities
October 16, 2013
Professional Learning:
Classroom Readiness
Greater Michigan Educational Consortium
Genesee ISD Awardee
Project Manager: Melissa White
46
Professional Learning: Classroom Readiness
October 16, 2013
Outcomes
Improve technology proficiency
Improve tech readiness for online assessments
Create instructional resources available to all educators
47
Professional Learning: Classroom Readiness
October 16, 2013
Outcomes
Provide data to review teacher and student growth in tech proficiency and online assessment readiness
Equip educators with the tools to integrate technology into classroom
instruction
48
Professional Learning: Classroom Readiness
Benefits to the Local Districts
October 16, 2013
Regional Coordinator and a cadre of coaches to assist teachers in the pilot buildings to become tech ready
Pilot buildings will be introduced to various online assessment tools to use with students on a regular basis
Educators in pilot buildings will be motivated and equipped to integrate technology into classroom instruction using Best Practices
49
Professional Learning: Classroom Readiness
October 16, 2013
50
Category Three:Statewide Activities
October 16, 2013
Professional Learning:
Assessment and CurriculumIntra-Michigan Technology Readiness Leadership
Consortium
Wexford-Missaukee ISD Awardee
Project Manager: Amber Kowatch
51
Professional Learning: Assessment and Curriculum
October 16, 2013
Outcomes
Provide knowledge, skills, and resources to help teachers effectively use the data from assessments to inform classroom instruction and help support student learning
Resources developed to support formative assessment practices, balanced assessment systems, and management of ongoing assessments within a school or classroom
Resources and professional development will be offered to build capacity for online assessment in K-2 classroom and students
52
Professional Learning: Assessment and Curriculum
Benefits to the Local Districts
October 16, 2013
A series of recorded webinars from national education experts
The series will assist districts in creating a best practice plan for developing a balanced assessment system
Educators will have a better understanding of what assessments are available and how they can use assessment results to make an immediate impact on classroom instruction
T IR GGet Tech Ready, Set…
Go Online!
Technology Readiness Infrastructure Grant
Six Sites to Choose from:
October 29, 2013Crystal Mountain ResortLunch: 11:15 am – 11:50 am
Presentation Time: 12:10 pm – 4:00 pm
http://tinyurl.com/techready-imtrlc
November 4, 2013Marquette-Alger RESA
Presentation Time: 8:30 am – 1:40 pm
Lunch: 12:00 pm – 1:00 pmhttp://
tinyurl.com/techready-maresa
November 7, 2013Genesee ISD
Presentation Time: 12:10 pm – 4:00 pm
http://tinyurl.com/techready-gisd
November 11, 2013Kent ISD
Lunch: 11:15 am – 11:50 amPresentation Time: 12:10 pm –
4:00 pmhttp://
tinyurl.com/techready-kentisd
November 12, 2013KRESA – West Campus
Lunch: 11:15 am – 11:50 amPresentation Time: 12:10 pm –
4:00 pmhttp://tinyurl.com/techready-kalamazoo
November 18, 2013Oakland Schools
Presentation Time: 12:10 pm – 4:00 pm
http://tinyurl.com/techready-oakland
3 SCECH’s Pending Approval
54
Website
TRIG Website
www.22itrig.org
October 16, 2013
55
Contact Information
October 16, 2013
• Tim Hall • Technology Readiness
Infrastructure Grant Project Director
General Informati
on
Questions
• Summer Franck• Communications Assistant
& Device Training Coordinator
Section 22i Technology Readiness
2012-13… $50,000,000.00 for technology infrastructure grants to districts or to intermediate districts on behalf of their constituent districts. Funds received under this section shall be used for access to a computer-adaptive test or for the development or improvement of a district’s technology infrastructure, including, but not limited to, hardware and software, in preparation for the planned implementation in 2014-2015 of online growth assessments.
2013-14… $45,000,000.00 for the technology infrastructure grant program for districts or intermediate districts on behalf of their constituent districts. Funds received under this subsection shall be used for the development or improvement of a district’s technology infrastructure, the shared services consolidation of technology and data, and hardware in preparation for the planned implementation in 2014-2015 of online growth assessments.
56
57
Goals for Tech Readiness2012-13 2013-14
Develop and implement collaborative purchasing arrangements for statewide network services and personal learning and assessment devices.
Establish sustainable, cost-effective
collaborations for sharing technology and data-related services to assist schools and districts to become “test ready.”
Build the capacity of educators at
ISDs, LEAs, and PSAs to effectively plan and implement online assessments and “Any Time, Any Place, Any Way, Any Pace” learning.
Competitively award a whole-
school technology pilot with a focus on economic and demographic diversity.
Develop and implement collaborative purchasing arrangements for statewide network services and personal learning and assessment devices.
Establish sustainable, cost-effective
collaborations for sharing technology and data-related services to assist schools and districts to become “test ready.”
Build the capacity of educators at
ISDs, LEAs, and PSAs to effectively plan and implement online assessments and “Any Time, Any Place, Any Way, Any Pace” learning.
58
FY2012-13
726 participants
56 ISDs (100%)
530 Districts (96.5%)
139 Charter Schools (50%)
58
Eligibility Requirements
Individual districts and ISDs must complete the Michigan Technology Readiness Assessment tool (MTRAx) by December 15, 2013.
Individual districts and ISDs must agree to complete an updated technology readiness planning process designated by the department by June 30, 2014.
59
Participation Requirements1. The district agrees to participate in one statewide or
regional consortium identified through the application process and report spending estimates under the new participation requirements. The district agrees to limit participation funds spending toward technology readiness efforts such as: Online/Digital Assessment, including universal diagnostic
screening tools In-building wireless connectivity Network services (i.e. additional bandwidth, content
filtering) Computer/device purchasing Technology and data collaborations that support online
assessment readiness
60
Participation Requirements (Cont.)
2. The district agrees to be represented in TRIG sponsored statewide 470 bids for E-rate funding and consider using the awarded vendors, although districts will not be bound to purchase from the bid. The district agrees to apply for all of their eligible E-rate Priority 1 service(s) where such participation is economically advantageous to the district.
3. In instances where the ISD or district manages its own wide area networks (WANs), the ISD/district will, if requested, allow for the connection of the ISDs/District WAN to the SEN (State Education Network). The ISD/District will permit installation of electronics and/or software, provided by this grant, required for implementing and performance monitoring of the SEN. This is with the understanding that the electronics and/or software provided by this grant will not negatively interfere with or control the ISD/District’s servers, routers, switches or other WAN equipment determined necessary and installed by June 30, 2014. 61
Participation Requirements (Cont.)
4. The district agrees to satisfactorily participate in one or more of the State of Michigan authorized online pilot and/or field test opportunities. To satisfy this requirement, the total number of online pilot and/or field tests administered in the district during the 2013-14 school year must equate to at least 20% of your district's full-time equivalency (FTE) pupil count from the Fall 2013 MSDS Collection. Please see participation examples below.
This requirement includes necessary activities related to online testing such as installing software, attending training, and performing online test preparation procedures. It is understood that the software will not negatively interfere with the district’s normal operations. The grant will not require the installation of software under these participation requirements after June 30, 2014.
62
Participation Requirements (Cont.)
Example #1: If a charter school with 150 student FTEs administers the science and social studies interim pilot assessments to 15 students in the fourth grade, that equates to 30 tests administered and therefore satisfies this participation requirement.
Example #2: If a K-12 school district with 1,700 student FTEs administers the ELA and math interim pilot assessments to 180 students in grades K through 2, that equates to 360 tests administered and therefore satisfies this participation requirement.
Example #3: If a K-12 school district with 5,000 student FTEs administers the US History, World History, Biology, and Chemistry interim assessments to 250 students (each), that equates to 1,000 tests administered and therefore satisfies this participation requirement.
63
Participation Requirements (Cont.)
5. The ISD/district agrees to complete MTRAx data collection by December 15, 2013, complete an updated technology readiness planning process designated by the department by June 30, 2014, and install any hardware and/or software provided by this grant that is necessary to achieve “low effort” in monitoring and reporting technology readiness at the ISD, district, and/or school building level with the understanding that electronics and/or software provided by the grant will not negatively interfere with nor control ISD/district’s servers, routers, switches or, WAN equipment determined necessary. The grant will not require the installation of hardware or software under these participation requirements after June 30, 2014.
64
Participation Requirements (Cont.)
6. The district agrees to participate in any necessary surveys sent out by the TRIG operations office to inform the work of the various activities (maximum of three per fiscal year, October 1, 2013 to June 30, 2014).
7. The district understands that its ISD must also agree to these requirements for the district to receive participation funds.
65
Simplifying Tech Readiness Grant
2012-13Category 1: Participation Category 2: ConsortiaCategory 3: Activities
Activity 1: Project MgtActivity 2: Tech ReadinessActivity 3: Classroom Readiness Activity 4: Device PurchasingActivity 5: Urban School Readiness (EAA)Activity 6: Data IntegrationActivity 7: Digital Assessment
Category 4: ConfirmationCategory 5: State Ed Network
2013-14InvitationConsortiaActivities Operations Office / E-Rate Michigan Technology
Readiness Assessment Tool (MTRAx)
Classroom Readiness Device Purchasing
Data Integration and Consolidated Data and Technology Services
Assessment and Curriculum State Ed Network Design /
Build66
67
22i Technology Readiness Infrastructure Grant
2012-2013 2013-2014
District Participation Approx. $15 million ($10/student)
Approx. $15 million ($10/student)
Consortium Leadership Approx. $1.5 million (combined)
Approx. $1.5 million(combined)
Statewide Activity Activities Approx. $17.5 million
Approx. $14.75 million
State Education Network $16 million Approx. $13.75million
Section 22i Technology Readiness
68
Statewide Activities
2012-2013 2013-2014
Project Management and E-rate Consortium
Approx. $3.0 million Est. $1 million
Technology Readiness Pilot Approx. $1.4 million Est. $500,000
Classroom Readiness $3.0 million $3 million
Statewide Device and Software Purchasing
$5.34 million $7 million
Section 22i Technology Readiness
69
Statewide Activities (Cont.)
2012-2013 2013-2014
Urban District Technology Readiness Pilot*
Approx. $3.4 million
$5 million
Data System Integration and Data Services
Approx. $1 million Approx. $3 million
Activity Seven: Curriculum and Instruction
$50,000 Est. $250,000
State Education Network (Build) $16 million Approx. $13.75 million
Section 22i Technology Readiness
December 15, 2013Participation Due Date
70
Section 22i Technology Readiness