techniques of lscs a review

48
Review of techniques of LSCS Veerendrakumar C.M MD.,DNB VIMS, Bellary

Upload: veerendrakumar-cm

Post on 07-May-2015

7.560 views

Category:

Health & Medicine


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Techniques of lscs a review

Review of techniques of LSCS

Veerendrakumar C.M MD.,DNB

VIMS, Bellary

Page 2: Techniques of lscs a review

James Young Simpson1811-1870

Obstetrics is not one of the exact sciences and in our penury of truth

- we ought to be accurate in our statements,

- generous in our doubts, - tolerant in our convictions.

Page 3: Techniques of lscs a review

evolutionBeing Bipedal

Being intelligent

Page 4: Techniques of lscs a review

Caesarean has evolved over centuries. It has meant different things to different people at different times.

Dead mother dead babyDead mother live babyLive mother live babyHealthy mother healthy babyHealthy mother, healthy baby & healthy

pelvic floor.

Page 5: Techniques of lscs a review

IS C.S. SAFE ?

NO !

Page 6: Techniques of lscs a review

….if a C.S is not done, the woman and her baby take the risks

….while if the C.S is done, The doctor takes the risk

Page 7: Techniques of lscs a review

‘REDUCE THE QUANTITY IMPROVE THE

QUALITY’

Page 8: Techniques of lscs a review

‘8’ hours Vs ‘8’ minutes

Page 9: Techniques of lscs a review

easy normal delivery or s. c. s.

Page 10: Techniques of lscs a review

O. T.A. Good Boyle’s apparatusB. Multipara monitorC. Suction apparatusD. Defibrillator ‘?’

Page 11: Techniques of lscs a review

Decorum of the O.T.

Page 12: Techniques of lscs a review

Timing of antibiotic administration

NICE RECOMMENDATION [new 2011]

• Offer women prophylactic antibiotics at CS before skin incision.

• Offer women prophylactic antibiotics at CS to reduce the risk of postoperative infections.

Page 13: Techniques of lscs a review

Choose antibiotics effective against endometritis, urinary tract and wound infections, which occur in about 8% of women who have had a CS.

Do not use co-amoxiclav when giving antibiotics before skin incision.

Page 14: Techniques of lscs a review

Skin preparationShaving results in microscopic

nicks and tears of the epidermis

Actually increases the risk of skin infection unless done immediately preoperatively.

Surgical obstetrics 1992

Page 15: Techniques of lscs a review

Betadine sprayBefore shifting to OT abdomen

cleansed and betadine spray applied

operating area covered with sterile drape

Prepackaged adhesive draping

Page 16: Techniques of lscs a review

IncisionPfannensteilJoel cohenMidline verticalSupraumbilical in morbidly obese

Am J obst gynecol

2000

Page 17: Techniques of lscs a review

Abdominal entry

Page 18: Techniques of lscs a review

Abdominal incision

NICE RECOMMENDATIONSThe transverse incision of choice should be the

Joel Cohen incision (straight skin incision, 3 cm above the symphysis pubis; subsequent tissue layers are opened bluntly and if necessary extended with scissors and not a knife).

It is associated with shorter operating times and reduced postoperative febrile morbidity. A

 

Page 19: Techniques of lscs a review

Meticulous attention to placement of skin incision

Allis clamp test

Am J Obst Gynecol 1991

Page 20: Techniques of lscs a review

Abdominal exposureTubular plastic

retractor with a rolled edge

Page 21: Techniques of lscs a review

UV fold entryBlunt or sharpPrevious surgery- sharp better

Page 22: Techniques of lscs a review

Uterine incision

-CLASSICALLY - several centimetres below the UV fold

- just below the UV fold

Page 23: Techniques of lscs a review

Uterine incision

NICE RECOMMENDATIONSWhen there is a well formed lower uterine

segment, blunt rather than sharp extension of the uterine incision should be used as it reduces blood loss, incidence of postpartum haemorrhage and the need for transfusion at CS. A

Page 24: Techniques of lscs a review

T incision is the weakest and poorest of uterine wound healing

Use J or double J (trap door) incision

Use of intravenous dilute 150 mcg-300 mcg NTG O’grady, operative obstetrics

Page 25: Techniques of lscs a review

E R R- for extraction of the head

Elevation Rotation Reduction

Cho, OBG management 2003

Page 26: Techniques of lscs a review

Difficult cranial deliveryThinking ahead is a great

boon

keep relaxants ready

Vaccum/short forceps/vectis

Keep asst ready for ‘Passing it up” technique

Page 27: Techniques of lscs a review

Delivery of the baby

NICE RECOMMENDATIONS

Forceps should only be used at CS if there is difficulty delivering the babies head. The effect on neonatal morbidity of the routine use of forceps at CS remains uncertain. C

[Either forceps or a vacuum device may be used to deliver the fetal head-Williams]

Page 28: Techniques of lscs a review

Delayed cord clampingSuggested benefits of delayed cord clamping

include decreased neonatal anaemia; Better systemic and pulmonary perfusion; and

better breastfeeding outcomes. Possible harms are polycythaemia,

hyperviscosity, hyperbilirubinaemia, transient tachypnoea of the newborn and risk of maternal fetal transfusion in rhesus negative women.

Page 29: Techniques of lscs a review

Delivery of placenta

NICE RECOMMENDATIONOxytocin 5 iu by slow intravenous injection

should be used at CS to encourage contraction of the uterus and to decrease blood loss. C

At CS, the placenta should be removed using controlled cord traction and not manual removal as this reduces the risk of endometritis.

A .

Page 30: Techniques of lscs a review

Mechanical dilatation of the cervixThree trials with a total of 735

women(CDSR)

There was insufficient evidence of mechanical dilatation of the cervix at non-labour caesarean section for reducing postoperative morbidity.

Page 31: Techniques of lscs a review

EXTERIORISATION OF UTERUS

"Misgav Ladach" Cesarean Section

Page 32: Techniques of lscs a review

Extra-abdominal versus intra-abdominal repair of the uterine incision at caesarean

Six studies were included, with 1294 women (CDSR)

There is no evidence from this review to

make definitive conclusions about which method of uterine closure offers greater advantages

Page 33: Techniques of lscs a review

Uterine closureNICE RECOMMENDATION Intraperitoneal repair of the uterus at CS should be

undertaken. Exteriorisation of the uterus is not recommended because it is associated with more pain and does not improve operative outcomes such as haemorrhage and infection. A

The effectiveness and safety of single layer closure of the uterine incision is uncertain.

Except within a research context the uterine incision should be sutured with two layers.

B

Page 34: Techniques of lscs a review

Correct method of uterine closure

Page 35: Techniques of lscs a review

Uterine closure auto stapler preloaded with

dissolving copolymer staples made of polylactic and polyglycolic acid

Incises and staples the myometrium in single actionNo advantage -cochrane review 2006

May be of use in fetal surgery

Page 36: Techniques of lscs a review

Suction… mop…

GUTTER CLEANING

Page 37: Techniques of lscs a review

Routine gutter cleaning with mopTo be avoidedMay result in microscopic

abrasions Adhesions may develop

Page 38: Techniques of lscs a review

Forgotten mop with sigmoid injury !!!

Page 39: Techniques of lscs a review

Closure versus non-closure of the peritoneum at caesarean section

Fourteen trials, involving 2908 women.(CDSR)

There was improved short-term postoperative outcome if the peritoneum was not closed.

Long-term studies --limited

Page 40: Techniques of lscs a review

Examination of adnexa mandatory

Page 41: Techniques of lscs a review

NICE RECOMMENDATIONRoutine closure of the subcutanoues tissue space

should not be used, unless the woman has more than 2 cm subcutaneous fat, because it does not reduce the incidence of wound infection.

A

Superficial wound drain should not be used at CS because they do not decrease the incidence of wound infection or wound haematoma.

A

Page 42: Techniques of lscs a review

NICE RECOMMENDATIONWomen having a CS should be offered

thromboprophylaxis as they are at increased risk of venous thromboembolism.

Page 43: Techniques of lscs a review
Page 44: Techniques of lscs a review

CAESAR trial european study3000 women recruited2x2x2 factorial multicentric RCT

Single- versus double-layer uterine closure.

Closure of the peritoneumLiberal versus restricted use of a

subsheath drain.

Page 45: Techniques of lscs a review

there is a difference in the duration of surgery(mean difference, 2.4 minutes; 95% CI, 1.3–3.6 minutes),favouring nonclosure. However, the duration of surgery is a poor surrogate for morbidity.

Page 46: Techniques of lscs a review

However, there have been suggestions that non closure of the peritoneum may be harmful in the longer term.

Lyell D, Peritoneal closure at primary caesarean delivery and adhesions. Obstet Gynecol 2005;106:275–80.

Page 47: Techniques of lscs a review

CORONIS 2x2x2x2x2fractional factorial randomised TRIAL in developing countries 15936 women

Blunt versus sharp abdominal entryExteriorisation of the uterus for repair versus

intra-abdominal repairSingle versus double layer closure of the

uterusClosure versus non-closure of the

peritoneum (pelvic and parietal)Chromic catgut versus Polyglactin-910 for

uterine repair

Page 48: Techniques of lscs a review

ReferencesTHE COCHRANE

LIBRARYCochrane Database

of Systematic Reviews

NICE GUIDELINES Issued: November

2011 NICE clinical guideline

132