team finland future watch presentation: innovative planning in the u.s.: engaging communities to...
TRANSCRIPT
Innovative Planning in the U.S.:Engaging Communities to Build Better Places
Dr. Robert Goodspeed, University of Michigan (USA)Research Assistants: Lacey Sigmon, Doug Plowman, Seul Lee
June 18, 2014
Lahde:
Evolution of Planning
Kent (1964):●Government focus●Plan-oriented●Minimal engagement
Albrechts (2004):●Government-led●Vision, actions & means for implementation●Stakeholder involvement crucial
Lahde:
Three Dimensions of Innovation:
Civic EngagementInstitutions
Public & Private Roles
Planning Practices
Illustrated By Three Cases:
● Boston Innovation District
● Chicago GOTO 2040
● San Francisco Municipal Office of Civic Innovation
Lahde:
Figure 1: Internet Use in America Between 1995 and 2014 Source: “Internet Use Over Time.” Pew Research Center, Washington, D.C. (2013) http://www.pewinternet.org/data-trend/internet-use/internet-use-over-time/, May 20, 2014.
Lahde:
Civic Engagement Trends
Park(ing) Day, San Francisco
Boston Innovation District (BID)
Lahde:
An example of some of the businesses locating in the Innovation District
Mayor Menino was a key backer of the project
Lahde:
District Hall: A key building in the Innovation District
Public, Private and Non-Profits involved in running the District
Developed on an underutilized section of land with good transport links to downtown
Aiming to create a 24-hour district for people to enjoy
Lahde:
Networking events are a key feature of the District. Events like this occur frequently.
Chicago GO TO 2040 Regional Plan
Lahde:
Innovative Kiosks were a key part of the public engagement process.
Invent the Future: The report created outlining the Public Engagement
Lahde:
Workshops were held across the Chicago Metro area
A snapshot of how the online software looked to users
San Francisco Mayor’s Office of Civic Innovation
Images: City of San Francisco
Living Innovation Zones Entrepreneurship in Residence Mayor’s Innovation Roundtable
Lahde:
Lahde:
ImproveSF:Online Platform for Cross-Sector Collaboration
http://www.improvesf.com
Lahde:Twitter Content Analysis for the Case Study Projects
Twitter Analysis
Engagement (advertising meetings, local events, Twitter interaction)•Boston – 40%•Chicago – 38.6%•San Francisco – 50.9%
Informational•Boston – 54.6%•Chicago – 56.6%•San Francisco – 48.1%
Lahde:
Institutions Public & Private RolesSocial Media
Discussion
Lahde:
Questions?
Robert GoodspeedAssistant Professor of Urban PlanningTaubman College of Architecture and Urban PlanningUniversity of Michigan
[email protected]: @rgoodspeedTel. +1 734-615-7254