teaching real art making

Download Teaching Real Art Making

Post on 23-Jan-2017

212 views

Category:

Documents

0 download

Embed Size (px)

TRANSCRIPT

  • National Art Education Association

    Teaching Real Art MakingAuthor(s): Teresa RobertsSource: Art Education, Vol. 58, No. 2 (Mar., 2005), pp. 40-45Published by: National Art Education AssociationStable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/27696064 .Accessed: 14/06/2014 00:42

    Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

    .JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range ofcontent in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new formsof scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.

    .

    National Art Education Association is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to ArtEducation.

    http://www.jstor.org

    This content downloaded from 195.34.79.253 on Sat, 14 Jun 2014 00:42:57 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=naeahttp://www.jstor.org/stable/27696064?origin=JSTOR-pdfhttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

  • The

    importance of teaching students to make real art?art with

    meaning?can be introduced by the following story.

    An art dealer (this story is authentic) bought a canvas signed "Picasso" and traveled all the way to Cannes to discover whether

    it was genuine. Picasso was working in his studio. He cast a single look at the canvas and said: "It's a fake." A few months later the

    dealer bought another canvas signed Picasso. Again he traveled

    to Cannes and again Picasso, after a single glance, grunted: "It's a

    fake." "But cher ma?tre," expostulated the dealer, "it so happens

    that I saw you working on this very picture several years ago."

    Picasso shrugged: "I often paint fakes." (Koestler, 1964, p.82).

    BY TERESA ROBERTS

    As a committed teacher of studio art, one of my goals is to encourage my students to create not fakes, but real art. Real art I define as any work of art that is the result of a sensitive individual's

    experience of and response to his or her life expressed through a particular

    medium. Real art can be, but does not have to be, entirely original: however, it must involve some kind of creative

    thought. And real art must be genuine. It must have meaning and be more than an exhibition of technical skill, an exercise in formal choices, or an exploration of

    media. Real art must have content related to the artist's own interests and

    experiences and/or arise from the artist's

    personal involvement with human issues and conceptual concerns. Perhaps, in the

    40 ART EDUCATION / MARCH 2005

    This content downloaded from 195.34.79.253 on Sat, 14 Jun 2014 00:42:57 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

  • above story, Picasso was just making a

    joke. Or perhaps he was referring to the

    meaning of the artwork. If even Picasso can create fakes, how then can we

    encourage our students to create real art?

    How can we teach in ways that promote meaning making in art production?

    Teaching students to make real art? artwork with meaning?is a problem that I have been grappling with for quite some time. I first encountered this issue as a student of art. Schooled by primary and

    secondary art teachers who apparently felt that a child's artistic development was best served by benign neglect, I despaired of ever learning anything tangible about

    artmaMng. My teachers seemed content to be nurturing dispensers of materials and I was left to discover what I could about art on my own. Technique, design, and content for me remained almost

    entirely intuitive.

    In college I fared slightly better. My art and art education professors alike focused primarily upon technical and

    design concerns while politely ignoring content. Content, it seemed, played an

    insignificant role in art. However, the more I learned about art, the more I

    recognized that the history of art was

    replete with individuals, like myself, who

    experienced their lives intensely, thought deeply about all manner of things, and used their art, not just as a means of self

    expression, but as a way of communi

    cating their ideas and experiences to other human beings.

    In the 1980s, content reappeared in the art curriculum in the form of Discipline Based Art Education (DBAE) (Fehr, 2004). As an art education student at the

    time, I embraced this approach with a certain degree of relief and, later, as an art

    teacher, I espoused and utilized it. Here at last was the recognition, as Manuel Barkan (1962) had suggested in the 1960s, that there was subject matter in the field of art that was important to teach. Here at last was the kind of structured approach toward art education curriculum and

    materials that Elliot Eisner had been

    promoting for years (Efland, 1990). And, here at last was an approach that invited me, as a teacher, to engage my students in

    thinking and talking about art history, criticism, and aesthetics as well as art

    production.

    Recently, however, prompted by a certain passivity in my students' involve ment with art lessons, I have turned my attention to an extension of DBAE, a method that is based on the belief that art students of all ages can best learn about art by working with the same type of content that professional artists work

    with?important ideas that are related to their own lives and the Uves of others, and

    by using artmaking processes similar to those of professional artists (Walker, 2001). This method differs from an "after the masters" approach and from many DBAE art lessons in that students are not

    encouraged merely to work with the

    subject matter, techniques, or styles of adult artist models. Instead, artmaking problems are designed around big ideas?

    important interdisciplinary human issues and ideas. Student artists are encouraged to make personal connections with these

    big ideas and explorations of these issues become the bases of their art. The

    artmaking processes of adult artists who work with similar big ideas are studied and sometimes used as models in this

    approach. However, the emphasis on

    individual exploration and reflection invites student artists to grapple with and

    make meaning of these issues in their own Uves. This common-sense synthesis of art

    education approaches suggests that it is

    possible to engage students both intellec

    tually and intuitively in art production. What follows is a brief examination of selected aspects of this approach, which

    may prove useful to art teachers who are

    also concerned with guiding their students toward making real art.

    * . "111 _%.; l E i t i ... XhS. i l l - _ i ::. . . 9 =~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~. .. . . . *::R.Nc a @ ! | Ell B I g#:.: i. Q i _ ::'St SllEI_ E S:: . :: ............................ :: ...._.. .. llk :_ ., ..... :, iej; . :.w N i E; i aS :SI~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~s . i : giM _!ef' ~~~~~~~~~~......

    - ;, } . >. e~~~~~~~~~~ia ... o.> o.R~~~~~~~~~~g m e e .e. ii i l l iiC@ eg'S 3 g~~~~~~~~~~~.... .. . .... t i B?.>.>!.>.S. X i i.' 1 2i:: g S:S -x Bipx~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~......

    6'f1S3 Y:::: ... ::' :: 'S;,:3BIE: ':!.: . ...... '.' _n o .:zB _s _ii~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~......o:..

    :::.::: ::e tmsec: ca:_: . :: : ....... :::.:: ::.>::so: ................ :S _Z~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.. .. ..... ..... __..._... ..... * w . .. , .,.j,., . CioM g _w s R~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~. . .. ... ... Y~~~ix !: : Eii . w~~~~~~~~~~~~~w~~o>X~~~~o>} .: ::.Y::. ::.i: E. zE; .......... B i _liJF st~ ~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~....... :: .X 3:ers_.:g ..:!.28.:::.i~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~e;..E}..i:.? _ _ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ..............i. . . . _...... j j j;_5 ,>>. -,,. jjC.. Sp *N_~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~......... :::;L.... ^_f} '. ::. s .E?.: ::is~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.... ... Z~~~~~~~~a: ::::r _ _ . .~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ .....: ... :.... B~~~~e . .: .: : i _ _ : : :. .................. : :: . i 3 _ bY~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~. .......................

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~. . . : . b ,,_.......... _}8

    I~~~~~~~~~~eS}::~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~. :S. ..E ::. .. S - --- --

    S.:g_. iS, ! .................. :_ .: ::~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.. . . . ....

    =-W_~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~. : t.. ... .... ... . .. ...... ... .. .. .. .. .. ... .. .. .. .. ..

    MARCH 2005 / ART EDUCATION 41

    This content downloaded from 195.34.79.253 on Sat, 14 Jun 2014 00:42:57 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

  • ...art classes should

    not be a rehearsal for

    making real art. Nor should they be technical workshops

    where students learn about skills and tools that they may use later in meaningful ways. Students should be

    engaged in the same

    types of activities as real artists.

    The Importance of Big Ideas in Classroom Artmaking Year after year I watch some of the art

    lessons that I present to my public school

    s