teacher evaluation process 2016-17 school year · teacher evaluation process 2016-17 school year...
TRANSCRIPT
Teacher Evaluation Process
2016-17 School Year
Created and Approved by MCUSD#2 PERA Joint Committee
Presented Spring 2016
Initial Evaluation Meeting (August)
• Detailed review of teacher performance rubric
• Review of student growth procedures
Overview of all StepsStep 1 • Pre-Conference
Step 2 • Pre -Assessments
Step 3 • Formal Observation
Step 4 • Conduct Midpoint Checks
Step 5 • Post-Observation Conference
Step 6 • Midpoint Check Conference(s)
Step 7 • Informal Observation(s)
Step 8 • Post-Observation Conference(s)
Step 9• Post
Assessments
Step 10 • Final Growth Target Meeting
Step 11 • Summative Evaluation Conference
*New Student Growth Steps are in BLUE
Step 1 – Pre-Conference
Pre-conference• Discuss any questions related to the teacher performance rubric
• Review pre-observation questions from Talent Ed
• Set date for formal observation/discuss formal observation
• Discuss and select two assessments for student growth (see TeacherSharedrive)
• Discuss dates to conduct/administer midpoint and end checks
Step 2: Pre-Assessments
Pre-assessments • Administer (two assessments)
• Score
• Set initial growth targets
Student Growth Target Data Collection: Assessment 1
Teacher Name: History Buff School: MHS
Class: World Cultures Per. 3 Assessment Name: Conflict in the Middle East
Student Name Pretest Score Growth TargetMid-point
Check
Adjusted Growth
TargetFinal Score Meets Target? (Y=1 N=0)
1 Anna
2 Bob
3 Chris
4 Dwight
5 Eleanor
6 Felix
7 George
8 Hannah
9 Katie
10 Lauren
11 Mia
12 Nora
13 Phillip
14 Oscar
15 Rhea
16 Shawn
17 Tia
18 Trina
19 Will
20 Xavier
21 Zeke
22 Andy
23 Becky
24 Charley
25 Donna
# of Students 25 Data for student growth component
# Meets Target
# of Students in Class
Step 3: Formal Observation
Formal Observation (Focus on Teacher Performance)• Complete pre-observation form in Talent Ed (if not completed previously)
• Complete post-observation reflection form in Talent Ed
• Reflect/prepare for post observation conference
Step 4: Conduct Midpoint Checks
Conduct Midpoint checks (may or may not be completed prior to Step 5)
• Record scores
• Consider adjustments to targets
Student Growth Target Data Collection: Assessment 1
Teacher Name: History Buff School: MHS
Class: World Cultures Per. 3 Assessment Name: Conflict in the Middle East
Student Name Pretest ScoreGrowth
Target
Mid-point
Check
Adjusted
Growth
Target
Final ScoreExceeds/Meets Target?
(Y=1 N=0)
1 Anna 15 52 48 52
2 Bob 25 55 40 55
3 Chris 29 65 60 65
4 Dwight 36 65 55 65
5 Eleanor 36 65 55 65
6 Felix 45 75 65 75
7 George 48 75 50 65
8 Hannah 49 75 65 75
9 Katie 50 80 85 90
10 Lauren 55 80 70 80
11 Mia 55 80 75 85
12 Nora 59 80 75 80
13 Phillip 71 90 80 90
14 Oscar 72 90 85 90
15 Rhea 75 90 80 90
16 Shawn 80 92 90 95
17 Tia 18 52 45 60
18 Trina 70 90 90 90
19 Will 41 65 55 65
20 Xavier 32 65 70 80
21 Zeke 36 65 55 65
22 Andy 36 65 60 65
23 Becky 48 75 65 75
24 Charley 49 75 60 80
25 Donna 55 80 80
# of Students 25 Data for student growth component
# M/E Target 0
# of Students in Class 25
Step 5: Post-Observation Conference
Post-observation Conference• Discuss lesson-feedback
• Discuss midpoint checks, if completed
• Discuss adjusted targets, if necessary
Step 6: Midpoint Check Conference(s)Midpoint check meeting (if not completed during post-conference)
• Share midpoint scores
• Share recommended adjustments (If any)
Student Growth Target Data Collection: Assessment 1
Teacher Name: History Buff School: MHS
Class: World Cultures Per. 3 Assessment Name: Conflict in the Middle East
Student Name Pretest ScoreGrowth
Target
Mid-
point
Check
Adjusted
Growth
Target
Final
Score
Meets Target? (Y=1
N=0)
1 Anna 15 52 48 52
2 Bob 25 55 40 55
3 Chris 29 65 60 65
4 Dwight 36 65 55 65
5 Eleanor 36 65 55 65
6 Felix 45 75 65 75
7 George 48 75 50 65
8 Hannah 49 75 65 75
9 Katie 50 80 85 90
10 Lauren 55 80 70 80
11 Mia 55 80 75 85
12 Nora 59 80 75 80
13 Phillip 71 90 80 90
14 Oscar 72 90 85 90
15 Rhea 75 90 80 90
16 Shawn 80 92 90 95
17 Tia 18 52 45 60
18 Trina 70 90 90 90
19 Will 41 65 55 65
20 Xavier 32 65 70 80
21 Zeke 36 65 55 65
22 Andy 36 65 60 65
23 Becky 48 75 65 75
24 Charley 49 75 60 80
25 Donna 55 80 80
# of Students 25 Data for student growth component
# Meets Target 0
Step 7: Informal Observation(s)
Informal Observation(s)• Complete post-observation reflection form in Talent Ed
• Reflect/prepare for post
Step 8: Post-Observation Conference(s)
Post-observation conference(s)• Discuss lesson
• What other evidence do we still need?
Step 9: Post-Assessments
Conduct Post-Assessment (two times)• Administer tests
• Score
• Complete Student Growth Target Data
Student Growth Target Data Collection: Assessment 1
Teacher Name: History Buff School: MHS
Class: World Cultures Per. 3 Assessment Name: Conflict in the Middle East
Student Name Pretest ScoreGrowth
Target
Mid-
point
Check
Adjusted
Growth
Target
Final
Score
Exceeds/Meets
Target? (Y=1 N=0)
1 Anna 15 52 48 52 54 1
2 Bob 25 55 40 55 55 1
3 Chris 29 65 60 65 66 1
4 Dwight 36 65 55 65 71 1
5 Eleanor 36 65 55 65 66 1
6 Felix 45 75 65 75 70 0
7 George 48 75 50 65 60 0
8 Hannah 49 75 65 75 76 1
9 Katie 50 80 85 90 75 0
10 Lauren 55 80 70 80 78 0
11 Mia 55 80 75 85 74 0
12 Nora 59 80 75 80 84 1
13 Phillip 71 90 80 90 91 1
14 Oscar 72 90 85 90 92 1
15 Rhea 75 90 80 90 90 1
16 Shawn 80 92 90 95 97 1
17 Tia 18 52 45 60 67 1
18 Trina 70 90 90 90 81 0
19 Will 41 65 55 65 68 1
20 Xavier 32 65 70 80 88 1
21 Zeke 36 65 55 65 65 1
22 Andy 36 65 60 65 70 1
23 Becky 48 75 65 75 73 0
24 Charley 49 75 60 80 82 1
25 Donna 55 80 80 75 0
# of Students 25 Data for student growth component
# M/E Target 17
# of Students in Class 25
Step 10: Final Growth Target MeetingFinal Growth Target Meeting
• Review student growth target data
• Calculate scores of two assessments
Student Growth Target Data Collection: Assessment 1
Teacher Name: History Buff School: MHS
Class: World Cultures Per. 3 Assessment Name: Conflict in the Middle East
Student Name Pretest ScoreGrowth
Target
Mid-
point
Check
Adjusted
Growth
Target
Final
Score
Exceeds/Meets
Target? (Y=1 N=0)
1 Anna 15 52 48 52 54 1
2 Bob 25 55 40 55 55 1
3 Chris 29 65 60 65 66 1
4 Dwight 36 65 55 65 71 1
5 Eleanor 36 65 55 65 66 1
6 Felix 45 75 65 75 70 0
7 George 48 75 50 65 60 0
8 Hannah 49 75 65 75 76 1
9 Katie 50 80 85 90 75 0
10 Lauren 55 80 70 80 78 0
11 Mia 55 80 75 85 74 0
12 Nora 59 80 75 80 84 1
13 Phillip 71 90 80 90 91 1
14 Oscar 72 90 85 90 92 1
15 Rhea 75 90 80 90 90 1
16 Shawn 80 92 90 95 97 1
17 Tia 18 52 45 60 67 1
18 Trina 70 90 90 90 81 0
19 Will 41 65 55 65 68 1
20 Xavier 32 65 70 80 88 1
21 Zeke 36 65 55 65 65 1
22 Andy 36 65 60 65 70 1
23 Becky 48 75 65 75 73 0
24 Charley 49 75 60 80 82 1
25 Donna 55 80 80 75 0
# of Students 25 Data for student growth component
# M/E Target 17
# of Students in Class 25
Student Growth Percentage of Students Range for Ratings
Excellent 85% 3.4 4
Proficient 68% 2.7 3.3
Needs Improvement 50% 2 2.6
Unsatisfactory < 49% 0 1.9
Number of students meeting
Percentage of Students
Demonstrating Growth
Percent Multiplied by 4 (to arrive at
the range)Student growth sample Number of students
Assessment #1 (Ex. World Cultures Per. 3) 25 17
Assessment #2 (Ex. World Cultures Per. 6) 20 15
Column Total 45 32 71.11% 2.8
Student Growth (30%) 2.8
Step 11: Summative Evaluation Conference
Summative Evaluation Conference