Tea Presentation On Elps

Download Tea Presentation On Elps

Post on 18-Dec-2014

1.674 views

Category:

Documents

1 download

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

<ul><li> 1. ELL Statewide Assessment Update Where We Are and Where Were Headed Title III Management Institute April 21, 2009 Megan Galicia &amp; Cristina Vazquez Managers Gloria Zyskowski Deputy Associate Commissioner TEA Student Assessment Division </li> <li> 2. Topics <ul><li>General info </li></ul><ul><li>Performance trends </li></ul><ul><li>Texas Projection Measure (TPM) </li></ul><ul><li>Future </li></ul></li> <li> 3. Texas ELL Population <ul><li>About 800,000 ELLs in Texas public schools per fall 2008 PEIMS </li></ul><ul><li>ELLs make up over 15% of total student population </li></ul><ul><li>About 90% are Spanish speakers </li></ul><ul><li>Over 100 languages represented in Texas schools </li></ul></li> <li> 4. First and Second Year Immigrants <ul><li>In spring 2008, approximately 677,000 K-12 ELLs were assessed in all domains with TELPAS </li></ul><ul><li>In grades 312, </li></ul><ul><li>about 20,000 1st year immigrants were reported </li></ul><ul><li>about 40% of 1st year immigrants and 19% of 2nd year immigrants received a composite rating of beginning </li></ul></li> <li> 5. ELLs in U.S. Schools 3 or More Years with Significantly Limited English <ul><li>In spring 2008, about 71,000 Texas ELLs in grades 3-12 who had been enrolled in U.S. schools for 3 or more years had composite TELPAS ratings of beginning or intermediate </li></ul><ul><li>This was about 1 in 5 students </li></ul></li> <li> 6. LEP for 5 or More Years <ul><li>In grades 512, 148,858 LEP students out of 216,181 who tested in all TELPAS domains were reported in spring 2008 as enrolled in U.S. schools for 5 or more years </li></ul><ul><li>This was about 69% , about 7 out of 10 </li></ul>Figures based on students with a composite rating </li> <li> 7. 2009 TELPAS Reading Online Test <ul><li>More than 99% of 2-12 ELLs likely to be assessed online </li></ul><ul><li>Less than 1% paper versions </li></ul></li> <li> 8. TELPAS Holistic Rating Training Data <ul><li><ul><li>Spring 2008 and 2009 online courses </li></ul></li></ul><ul><li><ul><li>Total of approximately 200,000 online courses completed </li></ul></li></ul><ul><li><ul><li>Qualification history </li></ul></li></ul><ul><li><ul><li>Over 140,000 successful qualifications from spring 2006 through spring 2009 </li></ul></li></ul><ul><li><ul><li>Success rate typically 90% or above </li></ul></li></ul></li> <li> 9. Performance on TAKS </li> <li> 10. Spring 2008 Grade 5 TAKS Math Primary SSI Administration Percent Passing No. = Numbers tested LAT results not included Students No. % All Eng and Spn 327,548 83 All Eng 322,315 83 Monitored 1 Eng 11,593 89 Monitored 2 Eng 20,385 90 Current LEP Eng 38,411 68 All Spn 5,233 48 </li> <li> 11. Spring 2008 Grade 8 TAKS Math Primary SSI Administration Percent Passing Students No. % All Eng 309,854 75 Monitored 1 Eng 3,436 71 Monitored 2 Eng 7,456 71 Current LEP Eng 18,085 41 </li> <li> 12. Spring 2008 Grade 10 TAKS Math Percent Passing Students No. % All Eng 293,041 63 Monitored 1 Eng 1,986 47 Monitored 2 Eng 2,527 52 Current LEP Eng 14,698 26 </li> <li> 13. LAT TAKS Spring 2008 Reading, Math, and Science Percent Passing *ELA for grade 10 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 R* Eng 48 26 20 22 12 15 16 Spn 64 45 41 49 M Eng 44 40 34 25 21 17 18 Spn 37 31 19 24 S Eng 22 7 10 Spn 17 </li> <li> 14. Grade 3 TAKS Reading Primary SSI Administration Percent Passing *Preliminary results Students 2008 2009* All Eng and Spn 87 89 All Eng 88 89 Monitored 1 Eng 97 99 Monitored 2 Eng 93 98 Current LEP Eng 80 83 All Spn 82 83 </li> <li> 15. Grade 5 TAKS Reading Primary SSI Administration Percent Passing *Preliminary results Students 2008 2009* All Eng and Spn 83 82 All Eng 83 83 Monitored 1 Eng 89 89 Monitored 2 Eng 86 89 Current LEP Eng 56 57 All Spn 72 68 </li> <li> 16. Grade 8 TAKS Reading Primary SSI Administration Percent Passing *Preliminary results Students 2008 2009* All 92 93 Monitored 1 Eng 92 92 Monitored 2 Eng 93 94 Current LEP Eng 58 63 </li> <li> 17. ELL Results Over Time </li> <li> 18. Grades 312 TELPAS Results: % Students at Each Proficiency Level <ul><li>B = Beginning </li></ul><ul><li>I = Intermediate </li></ul><ul><li>A = Advanced </li></ul><ul><li>H = Advanced High </li></ul>* First year of new TELPAS reading tests. Results not comparable to previous years Listening B I A H Speaking B I A H Reading B I A H Writing B I A H 07-08 7 20 35 38 10 24 35 32 9 17 27 48* 12 32 34 23 06-07 8 24 37 30 12 27 36 25 9 13 36 42 15 36 33 17 05-06 10 27 37 25 15 30 35 21 11 15 38 36 18 39 30 13 </li> <li> 19. TELPAS Composite Ratings 2006-2008 Percent Reaching Advanced High <ul><li>Composite weights have not changed </li></ul><ul><li>TELPAS reading tests changed in 2008 for grades 2-12 </li></ul>K-2 3-12 2008 16 45 2007 11 39 2006 10 32 </li> <li> 20. Then and Now: English Reading Proficiency Percent Rated Beginning RPTE 2001 TELPAS Reading 2008 Grade 3 25 12 Grade 10 21 7 </li> <li> 21. Secondary Reading / ELA Gains 2007 to 2008 Changes in Percent Passing Primary administrations LAT not included Grade All Students Current LEP 2007 (%) 2008 (%) 2007 (%) 2008 (%) 6 92 91 67 71 7 85 84 41 47 8 89 92 49 58 9 86 84 38 39 10 84 86 34 45 11 90 90 33 40 All LEP Gr. 8 2009 93 63 </li> <li> 22. Then and Now: TAKS Reading Percent of ELLs Passing Primary SSI administrations Panel recommended standards 2009 results preliminary Grade Spring 2003 Spring 2009 Grade 5 Eng 32 57 Grade 5 Spn 51 68 Grade 8 25 63 </li> <li> 23. Then and Now: Grade 4 Writing of ELLs Percent Passing 1998 TAAS 2008 TAKS ELLs Tested in English 71 86 ELLs Tested in Spanish 62 90 </li> <li> 24. Then and Now: LAT Math Percent Passing First LAT math administration was spring 2005 Grade No. Tested Spring 2005 No. Tested Spring 2008 Grade 3 Eng 1,402 37% 1,443 44% Grade 3 Spn 1,216 27% 1,225 37% Grade 10 2,536 8% 2,989 18% </li> <li> 25. Texas Projection Measure &amp; Vertical Scale </li> <li> 26. What is the Texas Projection Measure (TPM)? <ul><li>Applied to TAKS, TAKS (Accommodated), and linguistically accommodated versions of TAKS </li></ul><ul><li>A multi-level regression-based projection model </li></ul><ul><li>Projects student performance separately for each subject in the next high-stakes grade (defined by the Texas legislation as grades 5, 8, and 11) </li></ul></li> <li> 27. Texas Projection Measure (TPM) <ul><li>TPM uses current TAKS information to predict future TAKS performance </li></ul><ul><li>TPM will be reported for TAKS mathematics, reading, science, social studies and writing </li></ul><ul><li>TPM projections will be reported for both English and Spanish versions of TAKS </li></ul></li> <li> 28. TPM and ELLs Note: 4 th -grade Spanish writing will be projected to 7 th -grade English writing English 8 th Grade Spanish 5 th /6 th Grade English 8 th Grade English 5 th /6 th Grade Spanish 5 th Grade Spanish 3 rd /4 th Grade English 5 th Grade English 3 rd /4 th Grade TAKS Language Projected To TAKS Language Projected From </li> <li> 29. Example: Grade 6 to 8 Reading Note: Grade 8 Met Standard=700, Commended Performance=850 Grade 6 Met Standard (Rdg)=644, Commended (Rdg)=797 N 681 700 550 550 225.28 8 N 691 550 640 550 225.28 7 N 669 550 550 550 225.28 6 Y 717 550 550 650 225.28 5 Y 724 650 550 650 225.28 4 Y 709 600 600 600 225.28 3 Y 850 775 775 775 225.28 2 Y 741 640 640 640 225.28 1 Met TPM? PROJECTION CAMP_R M_VSS R_VSS INTERCEPT 0.0784 0.2511 0.4770 Student Scores </li> <li> 30. Reporting Spring 2009 <ul><li>On Confidential Student Report </li></ul><ul><li><ul><li>Indicator (yes/no) about whether student projected to meet the standard in the next high stakes grade </li></ul></li></ul><ul><li><ul><li>For reading/ELA and math </li></ul></li></ul><ul><li><ul><li><ul><li>Grades 3 and 4 to 5 </li></ul></li></ul></li></ul><ul><li><ul><li><ul><li>Grades 5, 6, and 7 to 8 </li></ul></li></ul></li></ul><ul><li><ul><li><ul><li>Grades 8, 9 and 10 to 11 </li></ul></li></ul></li></ul><ul><li><ul><li>For science </li></ul></li></ul><ul><li><ul><li><ul><li>Grade 5 to 8 </li></ul></li></ul></li></ul><ul><li><ul><li><ul><li>Grade 8 to 11 (2010) </li></ul></li></ul></li></ul><ul><li><ul><li><ul><li>Grade 10 to 11 </li></ul></li></ul></li></ul><ul><li><ul><li>For social studies </li></ul></li></ul><ul><li><ul><li><ul><li>Grades 8 and 10 to 11 </li></ul></li></ul></li></ul><ul><li><ul><li>For writing </li></ul></li></ul><ul><li><ul><li><ul><li>Grade 4 to 7 </li></ul></li></ul></li></ul></li> <li> 31. Spring 2009 Reporting Changes <ul><li>Same basic reporting information as past years </li></ul><ul><li><ul><li>Old scale with 2100 as Met and 2400 as Commended Performance </li></ul></li></ul><ul><li><ul><li>Same graph on Confidential Student Report (CSR) </li></ul></li></ul><ul><li>New Information </li></ul><ul><li><ul><li>Vertical scores added near Lexile/Quantile scores </li></ul></li></ul><ul><li><ul><li>Data file </li></ul></li></ul><ul><li><ul><li><ul><li>Vertical scale scores for 2009 </li></ul></li></ul></li></ul><ul><li><ul><li><ul><li>Vertical scale scores for 2008 (converted) </li></ul></li></ul></li></ul><ul><li><ul><li>Parent brochure explaining new information </li></ul></li></ul><ul><li><ul><li>Blackline master </li></ul></li></ul></li> <li> 32. Reporting Spring 2009 <ul><li>Projection indicator reported for </li></ul><ul><li><ul><li>April administration 5 &amp; 8 mathematics </li></ul></li></ul><ul><li><ul><li>April administration 3-11 reading and mathematics </li></ul></li></ul><ul><li><ul><li>May administration 5 &amp; 8 mathematics retests </li></ul></li></ul><ul><li>Projections used in AYP final for April 3-11 administration except for grades 5 &amp; 8 </li></ul><ul><li>For grades 5 &amp; 8, any student retesting will have projections recalculated for all subjects </li></ul></li> <li> 33. Current Plans for Reporting Summer 2009 <ul><li>Online reports </li></ul><ul><li>Student level </li></ul><ul><li><ul><li>2008 vertical scale score </li></ul></li></ul><ul><li><ul><li>2009 vertical scale score </li></ul></li></ul><ul><li><ul><li>Projection </li></ul></li></ul><ul><li><ul><li>Graph summarizing information </li></ul></li></ul><ul><li>Summary reports at the campus, district, region, and statewide levels </li></ul><ul><li><ul><li>Number and percent Met Standard </li></ul></li></ul><ul><li><ul><li>Number and percent Met TPM </li></ul></li></ul><ul><li><ul><li>Number and percent Met Standard OR Met TPM </li></ul></li></ul></li> <li> 34. TPM and AYP <ul><li>TPM will be used for 2009 AYP and state accountability calculations </li></ul><ul><li>Campuses and districts will get AYP and state accountability credit for students currently meeting the standard or projected to meet the standard </li></ul><ul><li>Use of TPM can only improve AYP and state accountability ratings </li></ul></li> <li> 35. More Information <ul><li>March 5, 2009, letter to school districts on TEA website under Whats New </li></ul><ul><li>Parent brochure with reports </li></ul><ul><li>Q and A (blackline master) </li></ul><ul><li>FAQ </li></ul><ul><li>Equations and practice spreadsheets </li></ul><ul><li>Step-by-Step </li></ul><ul><li>We are working as fast as we can to get information to you! </li></ul></li> <li> 36. Future </li> <li> 37. Reinforcing Connections <ul><li>In conjunction with other agency staff, Student Assessment staff will continue to reinforce connections between ELPS, content area TEKS, TELPAS, and TAKS </li></ul><ul><li>All teachers of ELLs are required to teach the ELPS </li></ul><ul><li>Understanding these connections is important </li></ul></li> <li> 38. English language proficiency standards are aligned and linked with TELPAS <ul><li>TELPAS rater training helps teachers internalize what ELPS proficiency levels (PLDs) mean and why they are important </li></ul><ul><li>Teachers who attend rater training are getting professional development on the PLD portion of the ELPS in addition to assessment training </li></ul>ELPS TELPAS </li> <li> 39. TELPAS Results <ul><li>TELPAS raters learn to directly assess how well students can use English to engage in academic instruction. This is what TELPAS is all about. </li></ul><ul><li>This understanding leads to understanding the need for linguistically accommodated instruction. </li></ul></li> <li> 40. Using TELPAS and ELPS to Inform Instruction <ul><li>At beginning of school year: Use prior springs TELPAS proficiency level ratings as starting place to...</li></ul></li></ul>