tana johnson university of chicago tana@uchicago

7
Guilt by Association? How Anti-U.S. Sentiment May Undermine the Legitimacy of Intergovernmental Organizations Tana Johnson University of Chicago [email protected]

Upload: barr

Post on 21-Jan-2016

33 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Guilt by Association? How Anti-U.S. Sentiment May Undermine the Legitimacy of Intergovernmental Organizations. Tana Johnson University of Chicago [email protected]. The Research Question. Anti-U.S. sentiment is prevalent and possibly growing, but does it matter in international relations? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Tana Johnson University of Chicago tana@uchicago

Guilt by Association?How Anti-U.S. Sentiment May Undermine the Legitimacy of Intergovernmental Organizations

Tana JohnsonUniversity of [email protected]

Page 2: Tana Johnson University of Chicago tana@uchicago

The Research Question

• Anti-U.S. sentiment is prevalent and possibly growing, but does it matter in international relations?

• My Answer: It can, by undermining the legitimacy of intergovernmental organizations (IGOs). I call this the possibility of “guilt by association.”

Page 3: Tana Johnson University of Chicago tana@uchicago

“Guilt by Association” Hypothesis

• An actor holding unfavorable perceptions of the United States likely also questions the legitimacy of the IGOs largely created by the U.S. or in which the U.S. possesses substantial ability to intervene.

Page 4: Tana Johnson University of Chicago tana@uchicago

The Dependent Variables

Total Observations: 6,479

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

Distrust a Lot Distrust a Bit Trust a Bit Trust a Lot Don’t Know/No Answer

Percent

UN

WTO

WB

IMF

“To what extent do you trust [each IGO] to operate in the best interests of society? If you don’t know what to reply or have no particular opinion, please say so.”

Page 5: Tana Johnson University of Chicago tana@uchicago

The Key Explanatory Variable

“Do you think the USA has a good influence or a bad influence on your country?”

Total Observations: 6,479

Rather Good28%

Rather Bad20%

Bad10%

Neither22%

Good14%

Missing6%

Page 6: Tana Johnson University of Chicago tana@uchicago

Probit ResultsdistrustWTO distrustUN distrustWB distrustIMF

opinUSA 0.163 ***

(0.030)

0.153 ***

(0.032)

0.166 ***

(0.034)

0.171 ***

(0.032)

opintechnoc 0.145 ***

(0.038)

0.071 ***

(0.015)

0.132 ***

(0.024)

0.075 ***

(0.026)

opingovt 0.218 ***

(0.034)

0.183 ***

(0.034)

0.196 ***

(0.027)

0.187 ***

(0.040)

globalexp -0.037

(0.031)

-0.033

(0.023)

-0.021

(0.021)

-0.043

(0.032)

pprspermo -0.001

((0.001)

-0.001

(0.003)

-0.000

(0.002)

0.002

(0.002)

worryglobzn 0.042

(0.072)

0.043

(0.104)

-0.082

(0.085)

-0.020

(0.074)

nationalism -0.052

(0.049)

-0.017

(0.035)

0.005

(0.049)

0.017

(0.048)

gendistrust 0.015

(0.038)

0.068***

(0.021)

0.084

(0.052)

0.099*

(0.053)

Observations 4582 4813 4593 4494

Page 7: Tana Johnson University of Chicago tana@uchicago

Estimated Probabilities that distrust[IGO] = 1

All variables at mean values EXCEPT: WTO UN WB IMF Ave. Change

from Baseline

(in % pts)

(1) opinUSA & opintechnoc & opingovt at min. 0.12 0.17 0.11 0.17 - 0.18

(2) opinUSA at min. (“good”) 0.22 0.25 0.20 0.25 - 0.10

(3) opingovt at min. (“trust a lot”) 0.23 0.27 0.21 0.27 - 0.08

(4) opintechnoc at min. (“very good”) 0.27 0.32 0.24 0.32 - 0.04

(5) Baseline: all variables at mean values 0.32 0.35 0.29 0.35 n/a

(6) opintechnoc at max. (“bad”) 0.37 0.38 0.34 0.38 + 0.04

(7) opingovt at max. (“distrust a lot”) 0.47 0.48 0.42 0.48 + 0.14

(8) opinUSA at max. (“bad”) 0.46 0.48 0.42 0.48 + 0.13

(9) opinUSA & opintechnoc & opingovt at max. 0.66 0.63 0.61 0.63 + 0.31

Note: all estimates are statistically significant at the 1% level.