talent factories hbr june 2007 - douglas a. ready, visiting professor london business school &...

24
TALENT FACTORIES ne 2007 - Douglas A. Ready, visiting professor London Business School & Conger, Chair in Leadership Studies at Claremont McKenna College in California

Upload: skye-cheevers

Post on 16-Dec-2015

220 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: TALENT FACTORIES HBR June 2007 - Douglas A. Ready, visiting professor London Business School & Jay A Conger, Chair in Leadership Studies at Claremont McKenna

TALENT FACTORIES

HBR June 2007 - Douglas A. Ready, visiting professor London Business School &Jay A Conger, Chair in Leadership Studies at Claremont McKenna College in California

Page 2: TALENT FACTORIES HBR June 2007 - Douglas A. Ready, visiting professor London Business School & Jay A Conger, Chair in Leadership Studies at Claremont McKenna

Talent Management• Research of HR in 40 companies – – Companies have formal talent processes in place

but they have fallen out of sync with what the company needs to grow or expand into new markets.

– Deep seated commitment from senior executives on talent issues is a must but difficult to keep the focus

– Lean organisations have no room for development positions

HBR June 2007 - Douglas A. Ready, visiting professor London Business School &Jay A Conger, Chair in Leadership Studies at Claremont McKenna College in California

Page 3: TALENT FACTORIES HBR June 2007 - Douglas A. Ready, visiting professor London Business School & Jay A Conger, Chair in Leadership Studies at Claremont McKenna

Talent Management• Talent Factories have two

critical elements:– Functionality, rigorous talent

processes that support strategic and cultural objectives

– Vitality, emotional commitment by management that is reflected in daily actions.

HBR June 2007 - Douglas A. Ready, visiting professor London Business School &Jay A Conger, Chair in Leadership Studies at Claremont McKenna College in California

Page 4: TALENT FACTORIES HBR June 2007 - Douglas A. Ready, visiting professor London Business School & Jay A Conger, Chair in Leadership Studies at Claremont McKenna

Talent Management• Functionality– The tools and systems that allow a company to put

the right people with the right skills in the right place at the right time

– Good design and technical excellence– Clearly linking processes to the company’s

objectives.

Page 5: TALENT FACTORIES HBR June 2007 - Douglas A. Ready, visiting professor London Business School & Jay A Conger, Chair in Leadership Studies at Claremont McKenna

Talent Management• Vitality– Is the attitudes and mind-sets of the people

responsible for the processes – not just in human resources but throughout the line, all the way to the top of the organisation.

– Unlike processes, which can be copied by competitors, passion is very difficult to duplicate.

– But there are measures that companies can take to build it into their culture.

Page 6: TALENT FACTORIES HBR June 2007 - Douglas A. Ready, visiting professor London Business School & Jay A Conger, Chair in Leadership Studies at Claremont McKenna

Talent Management• Vitality - Three defining characteristics–Commitment– Engagement –Accountability

HBR June 2007 - Douglas A. Ready, visiting professor London Business School &Jay A Conger, Chair in Leadership Studies at Claremont McKenna College in California

Page 7: TALENT FACTORIES HBR June 2007 - Douglas A. Ready, visiting professor London Business School & Jay A Conger, Chair in Leadership Studies at Claremont McKenna

Talent Management• Procter & Gamble– Tied its talent management processes to its strategy

for growth. Thus a focus on winning in emerging markets of China, India, Latin America, the Middle East and Eastern Europe

– Building a global talent supply-chain management process, coordinated worldwide but executed locally

– Hiring and promotions are the responsibility of local managers, but high-potential prospects and key stretch assignments are identified globally

Page 8: TALENT FACTORIES HBR June 2007 - Douglas A. Ready, visiting professor London Business School & Jay A Conger, Chair in Leadership Studies at Claremont McKenna

Talent Management• Procter & Gamble– New hires tend to be local talent. – Key stretch assignments and senior positions

are managed globally at the executive level. – The emphasis on hiring nationals translates

into a diverse pool of leadership talent for the entire corporation, especially at more senior levels.

Page 9: TALENT FACTORIES HBR June 2007 - Douglas A. Ready, visiting professor London Business School & Jay A Conger, Chair in Leadership Studies at Claremont McKenna

Talent Management• Procter & Gamble– As high-potential employees advance, they move

through a portfolio of senior level jobs that are categorized according to strategic challenges, size of the business, and complexity of the market.

Page 10: TALENT FACTORIES HBR June 2007 - Douglas A. Ready, visiting professor London Business School & Jay A Conger, Chair in Leadership Studies at Claremont McKenna

Talent Management• Proctor & Gamble– P&G offers formal training and development

programs and sometimes sends managers to external executive education programs.

– The lion’s share of development takes place on the job with the immediate manager’s support and help from mentors and teammates.

– Most managers are also placed on important multifunctional task forces or project teams from time to time

Page 11: TALENT FACTORIES HBR June 2007 - Douglas A. Ready, visiting professor London Business School & Jay A Conger, Chair in Leadership Studies at Claremont McKenna

Talent Management• Procter & Gamble– People and positions are tracked in a technology-

based talent management system that is sufficiently robust to accommodate all the company’s more than 135,000 employees but is primarily used to track 13,000 middle and upper management employees.

Page 12: TALENT FACTORIES HBR June 2007 - Douglas A. Ready, visiting professor London Business School & Jay A Conger, Chair in Leadership Studies at Claremont McKenna

Talent Management• Procter & Gamble

– To keep the systems relevant:• A global talent review – a process by which every

country, every function and every business is assessed for its capacity to find, develop, deploy, engage, and retain skilled people, in light of specific performance objectives. • P&G also evaluates the success rate of its key

promotions, using quantitative and qualitative measures that cover a three-year period. Managers who improve the business and its capabilities are deemed “successful”. The company has a success rate that exceeds 90%.

Page 13: TALENT FACTORIES HBR June 2007 - Douglas A. Ready, visiting professor London Business School & Jay A Conger, Chair in Leadership Studies at Claremont McKenna

Talent Management• Proctor & Gamble – Vitality– Fostering Commitment• Hires and develops people through a set of principles

that are specifically designed to foster commitment e.g. hire at entry level and build from within• College intern program that offers the chance to

assume real responsibility by working on important projects with the full resources of the company.• It also assigns interns to multifunctional teams that

work on business and organisational issues and present solutions to the CEO and senior management sponsors.

Page 14: TALENT FACTORIES HBR June 2007 - Douglas A. Ready, visiting professor London Business School & Jay A Conger, Chair in Leadership Studies at Claremont McKenna

Talent Management• Procter & Gamble - Vitality– Building Engagement• Employees are engaged in their own career

development from day one. They work with hiring managers to plot moves that will build what the company calls “career development currency”.• For high-potentials “destination jobs” are identified

which are attainable only if the employee continues to perform, impress, and demonstrate growth potential. • University recruiting is a line led activity and not HR led.

Page 15: TALENT FACTORIES HBR June 2007 - Douglas A. Ready, visiting professor London Business School & Jay A Conger, Chair in Leadership Studies at Claremont McKenna

Talent Management• Procter & Gamble – Vitality– Ensuring Accountability • Top management attention that clearly signals that

talent management is both a leadership responsibility and core business process. • All of P&G’s managers and executives understand that

they will be held accountable for identifying and developing the firm’s current and future leaders. • They are evaluated and compensated on their

contributions to building organisational competence, not just on their performance.

Page 16: TALENT FACTORIES HBR June 2007 - Douglas A. Ready, visiting professor London Business School & Jay A Conger, Chair in Leadership Studies at Claremont McKenna

Talent Management

• To be the “World’s Local Bank”–Worked to incorporate talent

processes into the firm’s DNA.

Page 17: TALENT FACTORIES HBR June 2007 - Douglas A. Ready, visiting professor London Business School & Jay A Conger, Chair in Leadership Studies at Claremont McKenna

Talent Management• HSBC – to be the “World’s Local Bank”–To develop local talent while

maintaining global standards, HSBC centrally designed its human resources practices and policies but built in some flexibility to accommodate local variations

Page 18: TALENT FACTORIES HBR June 2007 - Douglas A. Ready, visiting professor London Business School & Jay A Conger, Chair in Leadership Studies at Claremont McKenna

Talent Management

• HSBC – to be the “World’s Local Bank”–To help instil a global mind-set,

HSBC created a system of talent pools that track and manage the careers of high-potentials within the firm

Page 19: TALENT FACTORIES HBR June 2007 - Douglas A. Ready, visiting professor London Business School & Jay A Conger, Chair in Leadership Studies at Claremont McKenna

Talent Management• HSBC – to be the “World’s Local

Bank”– Managers of the pools then single out

people to recommend for the group talent pool, which represents the most senior cadre of general managers, and is administered centrally.

Page 20: TALENT FACTORIES HBR June 2007 - Douglas A. Ready, visiting professor London Business School & Jay A Conger, Chair in Leadership Studies at Claremont McKenna

Talent Management• HSBC – to be the “World’s Local

Bank”– Leaders maintain talent relationship

dialogues with members of each pool, in face-to-face conversations where possible, to address their development needs and concerns.

Page 21: TALENT FACTORIES HBR June 2007 - Douglas A. Ready, visiting professor London Business School & Jay A Conger, Chair in Leadership Studies at Claremont McKenna

Talent Management• HSBC – to be the “World’s Local Bank”–People are told that if they want to

reach the highest levels of management they must expect to work in at least two very different cultural environments.

Page 22: TALENT FACTORIES HBR June 2007 - Douglas A. Ready, visiting professor London Business School & Jay A Conger, Chair in Leadership Studies at Claremont McKenna

Talent Management• HSBC – to be the “World’s Local Bank”– Being assessed on a scale of 1 to 5 can be

demoralising for some. So rate only people in the top two levels and feedback to the rest on development needs and support.

Page 23: TALENT FACTORIES HBR June 2007 - Douglas A. Ready, visiting professor London Business School & Jay A Conger, Chair in Leadership Studies at Claremont McKenna

Talent Management• HSBC - Vitality– Building Engagement• Each unit must have a talent

implementation strategy• Early exposure to head office

location and interaction with top management

Page 24: TALENT FACTORIES HBR June 2007 - Douglas A. Ready, visiting professor London Business School & Jay A Conger, Chair in Leadership Studies at Claremont McKenna

Talent Management• HSBC – Vitality– Accountability• The group management board is held accountable for

the company’s talent pools. • Executives are also held accountable for maintaining

honesty in the talent management process.