tab a. .itinerary tab b.. .briefing slides tab c/67531/metadc...inter american air forces academy d....

TABLE OF CONTENTS

................................................................ TAB A. .Itinerary ............................................................... TAB B.. .Briefing Slides

TAB C .................................................................. MILCON 1391s ................................................................ TAB D.. MILCON BBPs ............................................................... TAB E.. ..BRAC Commission Slides ................................................................ TAB F.. Selected BRAC Data ................................................................ TAB G. ..Convoy Ops BBP ............................................................... TAB H.. ..Acronym Listing

............................................................ TAB J. ...... .: POC Listing

DCN:11701

651 Munitions Squadron Itinerary for Mr Art Beauchamp visit of STAMPISTRAPP 5 July 2005

All times approximate

1145: Arrive at Bldg 444--transport provided by 37 TRW protocol. Met by Col Golding, Maj Bennett, Chief Watts

1145-1200: Mission Brief in 651 MUNS Conf room. Attendees: Col Golding, Maj Bennett, Chief Watts, Mr Fred Sanchez (37 LRS

Muns Flt Chief), Key 651 MUNS personnel

1200-1215: Tour Bldg 421 EIM, 424, 425, 427 (Maintenance & Inspection bays, STAMP pallet storage)

1215-1245: Windshield tour of Munitions Storage Area, tour of 5 Storage igloos:

524: WGU-39125s (hinges) 532: JASSM 539: JDAM built up on 463L pallets 583: AGM-65G in containers 534: Rollerized floor with AGM-65D and MK-84 on 463L pallets

1245-1300: Depart MSA thru Gate 20122 ride convoy route down Hwy 90 to Lackland Flightline 840 Area

1300-1 330: Tour 840 Area

1330-1 345: Drive to Bldg 1530 E STRAPP Warehouse

1345-141 5: Tour STRAPP Warehouse

1415: 37 TRW Protocol picks up Mr Beauchamp

DCN:11701

DCN:11701

-

(I) w

(I) Ll 3 0

I .- 4-J -

DCN:11701

DCN:11701

- a- h- (IJ u u 'rr

DCN:11701

DCN:11701

1. COMPONENT

AIR FORCE

9. COST ESTIMATES

LACKLAND TRAINING ANNEX, TEXAS I CONSTRUCT MSM FACILITY (MSA) PH4 OF 4

PRIMARY FACILITIES

STOR IGLOO

ANTITERRORISM/FORCE PROTECTION (1.0%)

SUPPORTING FACILITIES

FY 2007 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA

(computer generated)

5. PROGRAM ELEMENT

PAVEMENTS

SITE IMPROVEMENTS

UTILITIES/COMMUNICATIONS SUPPORT

2. DATE

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION

1 SUBTOTAL I

4. PROJECT TITLE

6. CATEGORY CODE

CONTINGENCY ( 5.0 %)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SUPERVISION, INSPECTION AND OVERHEAD ( 5.7 % )

TOTAL REQUEST

TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)

EQUIPMENT FROM OTHER APPROPRIATIONS (NON-ADD)

UNIT

7. PROJECT NUMBER

COST

8. PROJECT COST ($000)

110. Description of Proposed Construction : Construct 3 earth covered reinforced

concrete Hayman Type igloos, 26' x 80', capable of storing 500,000 pounds of Class 1.1 munitions. Work includes access roads, reinforced aprons, utilities and other

necessary support. Complies with DoD Minimum Antiterrorism Standards for Buildings, UFC 4-010-01.

I11.REQUIREMENT: 750TN ADEQUATE : 0 TN SUBSTANDARD: 750TN

PROJECT: Constructs 3 earth covered reinforced concrete Hayman Type igloos, 26' x

801,capabile of storing 500,000 pounds of classl.1 munitions. Work includes access roads, reinforced aprons, utilities and other necessary support.

REQUIREMENT: Properly sized and configured munitions storage facilities are required to support the new Standard Air Munitions Packages (STAMP) mission for SDB assets. STAMP assets are war reserve munitions (WRM) required by all Combat Air Force (CAF) involved in many types of contingencies worldwide. Separate structures are required to support single point load out locations to meet STAMP contingency support and to provide safe

and efficient explosives handling and storage capabilities within the existing explosive safety footprint. These igloos must be capable of storing 500,000 pounds Net Explosives

Weight (NEW) of Class 1.1 explosives.

CURRENT SITUATION: The SDB is an ACC new mission requirement. SDB STAMP assets are packaged in a pre-loaded configuration inside a 12-foot long container as well as individual bombs. The existing igloos are utilized to their maximum capacity. Without changes there is insufficient capacity for the current workload and nocapability to accommodate new missions assigned to Lackland AFB.

IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED: Failure to provide adequate SDB storage facilities would result in costly production and fielding delays. Additionally, the SDB would not be immediately available to warfighters if STAMP storage facilities are not provided.

I

DD FORM 1391, DEC 99 Previous editions are obsolete. Page No.

DCN:11701

LACKLAND TRAINING ANNEX, TEXAS ( CONSTRUCT MSM FACILITY (MSA) PH4 OF 4 5. PROGRAM ELEMENT 1 6. CATEGORY CODE 1 7. PROJECT NUMBER 1 8. PROJECT COST ($000)

2. DATE 1. COMPONENT

AIR FORCE

DDITIONAL: This project meets the criteria/scope specified in AFH 32-1084, Standard

E'Y 2007 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA


racility Requirements. All known alternative options including conversion, leasing and status quo were considered during the development of this project. No other option 3ther than new construction could meet mission requirements; therefore, an Economic halysis Certificate of Exception has been performed.


JOINT USE CERTIFICATION: This facility can be used by other components on an "as

wailable" basis; however, the scope of the project is based on Air Force requirements.

4. PROJECT TITLE


DCN:11701

I 1. COMPONENT I E'Y 2007 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 1 2. DATE

I LACKLAND TRAINING ANNEX, TEXAS I CONSTRUCT MSM FACILITY (MSA) PH4 OF 4

AIR FORCE

1 5. PROGRAM ELEMENT I 6. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMBER 8. PROJECT COST ($000)


1 12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:

1 a. Estimated Design Data:

I Status: (a) Date Design Started (b) Parametric Cost Estimates used to develop costs

* (c) Percent Complete as of 01 JAN 2006 * (d) Date 35% Designed

(e) Date Design Complete

(f) Energy Study/Life-Cycle analysis was/will be performed


(2) Basis: (a) Standard or Definitive Design - (b) Where Design Was Most Recently Used -

4. PROJECT TITLE

(3) Total Cost (c) = (a) + (b) or (d) + (e) : (a) Production of Plans and Specifications (b) All Other Design Costs (c) Total (d) Contract (e) In-house

I (4) Construction Contract Award

I (5) Construction Start

YES

(6) Construction Completion

* Indicates completion of Project Definition with Parametric Cost Estimate which is comparable to traditional 35% design to ensure valid scope, cost and executability.

b. Equipment associated with this project provided from other appropriations:

FISCAL YEAR PROCURING APPROPRIATED

EQUIPMENT NOMENCLATURE APPROPRIATION OR REQUESTED

TRK n DED 1 5 ~ PT

TRAC 4450G 6 X 4

STLR 20T 40FTW CMNR

COST ($000)


DCN:11701

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION 3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION I MUNITIONS MAINTENANCE AND

1 . COMPONENT

AIR FORCE FY 2007 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA


LACKLAND TRAINING ANNEX, TEXAS 5. PROGRAM ELEMENT 1 6. CATEGORY CODE

9. COST ESTIML

2. DATE

INSPECTION FACILITY 7. PROJECT NUMBER 18. PROJECT COST ($000)

7.28.96

ITEM MAINTENANCE AND INSPECTION FACILITY

EXPLOSIVES MAINTENCE AND INSPECTION ANTITERRORISMIFORCE PROTECTION (0.5%)

SUPPORTING FACILITIES SOILS ANALYSIS AND REMOVAL SITE IMPROVEMENTS PA VEMENTSIACCESS UTILITIES TELECOMMUNICATIONS

SUBTOTAL CONTINGENCY (5.0%) TOTAL CONTRACT COST SUPERVISION, INSPECTION AND OVERHEAD (5.7'36) TOTAL REQUEST TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED) OTHER APPROPRIATIONS (FURNITURE, EQUIPMENT)

QUANTITY

1,458

2 12-2 13

UNIT COST

1,620

L 10. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION: Concrete foundation and floor slab, structural steel

MCP MPYJ 95-3220

framing, and a standing seam metal roof. One-story structure with maintenance bays and administrative offices. Project includes soils analysis and hauling, site improvements, pavements, interior and area lighting, lightning

EEIC: 321 3,400

2nd fire protection systems, and all necessary utilities. 1 1 . REQUIREMENT: 1,458 SM; ADEQUATE: 0 SM; SUBSTANDARD: 1,458 SM >ROJECT: Construct munitions maintenance and inspection facility (Current Mission) XEQUIREMENT: A properly sized and configured munitions maintenance and inspection facility capable of 24- lour a day operation is required to support the 651 Munitions Squadron mission at Lackland AFB. Also ncludes area lighting, lightning and fire protection systems to accomplish the munitions mission. ZURRENT SITUATION: Current maintenance and surveillance/inspection operations are conducted in aging, lilapidated and inadequately configured facilities that do not allow the required explosives weight for current Standard Air Munitions Packages (STAMP) and Standard Tanks, Racks, Adapters, and Pylon Packages STRAPP) programs. Operations are restricted to two explosive operating bays and must be replaced with four jays to effectively accomplish the mission. Lighting is poor and is to some extent non-existent. Safety :onditions are compromised due to maintenance operations being accomplished in crowded, poorly lit facilities. MPACT IF NOT PROVIDED: Without this facility munitions personnel will continue to be subjected to leedlessly unsafe and crowded conditions and will be forced to continue multiple movements of munitions and :qiiipment to perform maintenance procedures in inadequate operating bays. As a result, the Munitions jquadron mission will be severely degraded. IDDITIONAL: This project meets the criterialscope specified in AFH 32-1084, "Standard Facility 7equirement.s. " All known alternative options including conversion, leasing and status quo were considered luring the development of this project. No other option other than new construction could meet mission equirements; therefore, a Certificate of Exception has been performed. 3ASE CIVIL ENGINEER: Lt Col Jeffry D. Knippel, Commercial 2 10-67 1-2977, FAX 2 10-67 1-4074 h a i l to: [email protected] MUNITIONS MAINTENANCE FACILITY 1,458 SM = 15,700 SF)

ID Form 139 1 Page No. 1

DCN:11701


I . COMPONENT

AIR FORCE

REQUIREMENTS CALCULATION

FY 2007 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA (computer generated)

LACKLAND AIR FORCE BASE, TEXAS

Tactic,al MissiIelGlide Weapon Maintenance Shop 2 12-2 13 AFH 32- 1084, Chap 7, Para 7.17 Surve~llance and Inspect~on Shop 215-582 [AFH 32-1084, Chap 7 , Para 7.231

2. DATE

4. PROJECT TITLE MUNITIONS MAINTENANCE A N D INSPECTION FACILITY

Suace Criteria

5 . PROJECT NUMBER

MPYJ 95-3220

Work Bay 1 260.1 1 2,800

Component

Work Bay

I Work Bay 1 260.1 1 2,800 I

Net Area Square meters I Square feet

260.1 1 2,800

/ Latrines 1 33.4 1 360 I

Work Bay

Test Cell

ReadyITraining Room

ToolITest Equip. Room

Supply & Equip. Storage

I Administration 1 139.4 1 1,500 I

260.1

14.9

41.8

27.9

27.9

This project encompasses joining category code 215-582 and 212-213 into one facility. The new facility will house 57 workers, as well as, facilities for missile maintenance and munitions surveillance. Work bays will be 50' X 56' to accommodate support equipment, personnel and staging of munitions.

2,800

160

450

3 00

300

Mech/Elec/Telecomm (1 0%)

Total TMIGWIS&I Shop

D Form 1391 Page No. 2

132.6

1,458.3

1,430

15,700

DCN:11701

I L A C K L A N D A I R F O R C E B A S E . T E X A S

I . C O M P O N E N T

A I R F O R C E

I EXISTING FACILITIES/DEFICIENCY DETAIL DATA SHEET

3. I N S T A L L A T I O N A N D L O C A T I O N

F Y 2007 M I L I T A R Y C O N S T R U C T I O N P R O J E C T D A T A (computer generated)

4. P R O J E C T T I T L E M U N I T I O N S M A I N T E N A N C E A N D I N S P E C T I O N FACILITY

SCOPE OF FY 04 REQUEST: 1,458 SM

2. D A T E

5. P R O J E C T N U M B E R

M P Y J 95-3220

REQUIREMENTS COMPUTATIONS REQUIREMENTSIASSETS Mission: Basic Training Wing a. Total Requirement

Technical Training Wing b. Existing Substandard Defense Language Institute c. Existing Adequate Inter American Air Forces Academy d. Funded Not in Inventory

e. Adequate Assets (c+d) f. Included in FY04 Program g. Deficiency (a-e-f)

Rea~~irement: See Calculations Page

I Current Mission/New Mission Analysis: Current Mission = 100%

Scope 0 1,458 3,030

0 0 0 0

1,458

NBR OF BLDGS

1 3 0 0 0 0 1

b. Existing Substandard: 3030 SM CAT SCOPE TOTAL CONDITY PE CODE NOMENCLATUREIBLDG NBR BLDG (SM) YEARKODEICONST REMARKS 212-213 SHPTACMSLGlWl421E 1,486 1954 3 CMU Convert* 2 15-582 SHP SRVLL INSP 142 1 M 1,488 1954 3 CMU Convert* 2 15-582 SHP SRVLL INSP 1428 2 1954 3 CMU Future Demo

3,030

c. Existing Adequate: 0 SM CAT SCOPE TOTAL CONDITYPE CODE NOMENCLATUREIBLDG NBR BLDG (SM) YEAWCODEICONST REMARKS

g. Deficiencv: 1,458 SM CAT SCOPE TOTAL CONDITYPE

CODE NOMENCLATUREIBLDG NBR BLDG (SM) YEAR/CODE/CONST REMARKS

* Existing buildings, 421E and 421M, are historical and will be retained and converted t o inert and non-explosive storage. This action will relieve overcrowding in current storage facilities.

I D Form 139 1 Page N o . 3

DCN:11701

AIR FORCE I -

3 , INSTALLATION AND LOCATION

:ECB/Wimberley/2 1 MarO5/d:\l5-Projects\l391 s\95-3220-050321 M&I Facility.doc

LACKLAND AIR FORCE BASE, TEXAS 4. PROJECT TITLE 1 5. PROJECT NUMBER

1. COMPONENT

COST DETERMINATION


MUNITIONS MAINTENANCE AND INSPECTION FACILITY

1 Project Name: / Munitions Maintenance and Inspection Faality

2. DATE

MPYJ 95-3220

I Buildina Number: I NEW / I 1 I - Project Location: Project Scope:

Size Adiustrnent Factor I (From Tab SAR 1 I 0.921

Lackland Training Annex, TX 1,458 1 SM

Facility Type Categ~ry Code ACF

FROM OSD PRICING GUIDE SHP TAC MSL GNV & SHP, SRVLL INSP

Unit Cost: I Maximum Unit Cost

I

21 2-21 3/21 5582 (From Tab ACF):

I I I I I I

COST ESTIMATE

0.82

(Unit Cost x ACF x SAF) I

PRIMARY FACl UTl ES Fire Station / Anti-terrorisdForce Protection

SUPPORTING FAClUTlES /

$2,147.40 $1,620.00

Soils Analysis and Removal Site l rnprovements Pavements Utilities Telecommunications

1 Subtotal Contingency

1 Tdal Contract Costs

SCOPE

0.5

Supervision Inspection & Overhead Total ~equest 1 Total Request (Rounded)

/ Tdal Project Cost

2.9 6.9 6.9 6.9

5.0

Other Appropriations (Furniture, Equipment)

DD Form 1391 c Page No. 4

UNITCOST

1,458 %

5.7

68

COST ($000) 2.374

% % % %

%

$1,620.00

68 163 1 63 163 - 1 18

3,049 - 1 52

3,202 %

2,362 12

675

- 1 82 3,384 3,400

DCN:11701

CECBlWimberley12 1 MarO5/d:\l5-Projects\] 391 s\95-3220-050321 M&1 Facility.doc

TRAINING ANNEX (MEDINA) - d

I .COMPONENT AIR FORCE

(AETC)

LACKLAND AIR FORCE BASE. TEXAS

- - -

Coordination:

4. PROJECT TITLE MUNITIONS MAINTENANCE AND

37 CESICEV (Environmental) Date


FY 2007 CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA (computer generated)

5. PROJECT NUMBER

37 CESICEF (Fire Dept) Date

2. DATE

37 CESICommunity Planner Date

Approval:

Base Clvil Engineer Date

37 SPTGICC Date

DD Form 1391 SITE LOCATION PLAN

Page No. 5

DCN:11701

AIR FORCE FY 2007 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA (AETC) (computer generated)


LACKLAND AIR FORCE BASE. TEXAS 4. PROJECT TITLE 5 . PROJECT NUMBER

MUNITIONS MAINTENANCE AND INSPECTION FACILITY MPYJ 95-3220

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE F O R CRITICAL PLANNING ACTIONS

Command t\lR FORCE EDUCATION AND TRAINING COkIRIAND (AETC) Base. State, Country if Overseas: LACKLAND AFB, T X

I . INSTRUCTIONS: Place one X in the most appropriate response for each top~c area to show current status of compliance. When responding to a statement requ~ring additional data, f i l l in the blank with appropriate information. If none of the printed statements are appropriate, add or attach an appropriate comment. For MILCON projects, the Civil Engineering Squadron Commander and installation commander must sign the cert~ticate and submit ~t to the MAJCOM staff where it will be updated, retained and be readlly available if required by HQ USAF.

11. PLANNING: I . Environmental Impact Analys~s Process (AFI 32-7061):

Categorical exclusion number applies. - Environmental Assessment under preparation. Expected completion date is -

X Finding o fNo Significant Environmental Impact signed on - April 2001 (date). - Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) under preparation. Expected completion date is - Draft EIS filed on (date). - Final EIS filed on (date). - Record of decision filed on (date). - Foreign nation or protected global resource exemption number applies. - Environmental study (or review underway) under preparation. Expected completion date is - Environmental study (or review) completed on (date). Finding of "No Practical Alternative" signed (date) -

2. Wetlands (AFl 32-7064): X Project is not sited in a wetland. -

Requirements of Clean Water Act, Section 404 & 401 in progress. Expected completion date is (date). -

Req~lirements of Clean Water Act, Section 404 & 401 completed on (date). - Sectlon 404 & 401 Permits issued (date). - Finding of -'No Practical Alternative" signed (date). -

3. Flood plains (AFI 32-7064): X Project is not sited in a 100-year flood plain. -

Requirements of EO 1 1988 in progress. Expected completion date is -

Project is sited in a 100-year flood plain. Requirements of EO 1 1988 completed on (date). Finding of "No Practical Alternative" signed (date). -

4. Coastal Zone Management (AFI 32-7064): X Project does not directly affect a state coastal zone. -

Consistency determination being developed. Expected completion date is Consistency determination completed on (date).

5 Coastal Barrier Resources (AFI 32-7064): X Project is not sited within the Coastal Barrier Resources System. -

Project exempt from the Coastal Barrier Resources Act (CBRA). Consultation with the Regional Director, United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), in progress. - Estimated completion date is - Consultation with the Regional Director, USFWS, concluded (date). -

6 Threatened and Endangered Species (AFI 32-7064): X Project has no potential for affecting threatened or endangered species or critical habitats. -

Based on consultation with USFWS or host nation liaison on (date), threatened or endangered species in the vicinity of the project will not be affected. - Consultation with USFWS/NMFS underway in accordance with the Endangered Species Act. Formal consultation with the Regional Director, USFWS completed on (date). - Biological Assessment is required. Estimated completion date is -

Biological opinion issued by USFWS on (date). -

DD Form 1391 Page No. 6

DCN:11701


CECBlWimberley12 1 MarO5/d:\l5-Projects\l391 s\95-3220-050321 M&I Facility.doc

4. PROJECT TITLE MUNITIONS MAINTENANCE AND INSPECTION FACILITY

5. PROJECT NUMBER

MPYJ 95-3220

2. DATE I . COMPONENT AIR FORCE

(A ETC)

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

F O R CRITICAL PLANNING ACTIONS (CONTINUED)

7 Cultural Resource Management (AFI 32-70651

Properties affected by project are addressed in a Programmatic Agreement that was fully executed with the State H~storic - Preservation Officer and the ACHP on (date). Prqject area has not been surveyed for historic properties. Survey requirements are identified in the A-106 system and the estimated -



completion date is X Project area has been surveyed and no historic properties were identified. The State Historic Preservation Officer was notified by -

letter dated Survey identified historic properties but the project will have no effect on them; written concurrence by the State Historic Preservatio~ - Officer is dated After consultation, State Historic Preservation Officer concurred that the project will have no adverse effect on historic properties. - The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation concurred in writing with this determination on (date). Project will have an adverse effect on historic properties. A memorandum of agreement (MOA) mitigating the adverse effect was - executed on (date). Estimated date to execute the MOA is or No MOA was developed and the formal comments of the Council were - sought in a memo dated Project will affect a site or property of interest to Native Americans. - Appropriate Native American Tribe or Group contacted on (date) -

8. Inceraeencv and Intergovernmental Coordination for Environmental Planning (AFI 32-7060): X Coordination of proposed project with the state Single Point of Contact or other agencies is not required.

Coordinat~on with the state Slngle Pomt of Contact is in progress. Expected date of completion is Proposed project was coordinated with the state Single Point ol'contact or other agencies on (Specil'y any other agencies).

9. Environmental Permits (AFIs 32-7040. 7041. 7042. 70441: X No permits are required.

No permits required, but regulatory agency notification required prior to construction (e.g, underground storage tank removals) The following permits are required prior to construction: (List the construction and operating permits).

10 I'otentiallv Rewlated Substances (AFls 32-1052. 7042):

a. Asbestos: X not present; - survey underway; - - present; scheduled for removal as required by applicable state regulations.

b. Lead-Based Paint:

- not present; - survey underway; X present; (Describe mitigation.) Building components that must be removed will be classified for proper disposal -

mitigation is not necessary as insufficient quantities exist to require mitigation.

c. Ozone depleting substance: X not present; - survey underway; -

present; (Describe mitigation, or state why mitigation is not necessary.)

d Polvchlorinated biphenvls (PCBs): X not present; - survey underway; -

present; (Describe mitigation, or state why mitigation is not necessary.) - eRadon:

X not present; - survey underway; - - present; (Describe mitigation, or state why mitigation is not necessary.)

f. Other known hazardous or toxic substances and oollutants: (e.g. contaminated soils) X not present; survey underway;

present; scheduled for removal as required by applicable state regulations. -


DCN:11701

CECBlWimberley12 1 MarO5/d:\l5-Projects\l391~\95-3220-050321 M&I Facility.doc 1. COMPONENT I 1 2. DATE

AIR FORCE FY 2007 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA (A ETC) (computer generated)


I2 Environmental Restoration Program (ERP): X Facility IS not sited on or near an ERP site. -


Facility is sited near an ERP site. Approximately feet away. - Facility is on an ERP site. -

A Request for Waiver was submitted to MAJCOM on (date). - - The site is projected to be remediated and/or closed out on (date), prior to commencement of

4. PROJECT TITLE MUNITIONS MAINTENANCE AND INSPECTION FACILITY

construction activities. The nature of the site contamination does not preclude the type of construction activity proposed. - There is a Compliance Agreement associated with this site -

- A Remedial Investigation Feasibil~ty Study was completed on (date) to accurately delineate the aerial extent of the contamination.

5. PROJECT NUMBER

MPYJ 95-3220

13. Air Pollutants (AFI 32-7040): X Will not be generated by the operation or construction ofthis facility. -

Will be generated by the operation or construction of this facility. (describe type and amount of substance expected to be generated, existing control systems, and the need for additional controls). -

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE FOR CRITICAL PLANNING ACTIONS

(CONTINUED) I I Radon at New Construct~on Sites:

X Not Present. - present: (Describe mitigation, or state why mitigation I S not necessary.)

Conformity determination required. - X Conformity determination not required.

.4 . Water Pollutants (AFI 32-7041): X Facility will not generate water pollutants. - X Facility construction will not cause soil erosion.

Facility will generate water pollutants. Describe type and amount along with minimization, treatment, and disposal plan - Facility construction w ~ l l cause erosion and require an erosion control plan.

5 Sol~d and Hazardous Wastes (AF1 32-7042. 32-7080L X Fac~l~ ty will not be used for managing solid or hazardous wastes. -

Facility will be for managing solid or hazardous wastes. - 6. Underground Storage Tanks (AFI 32-7044) (Check all that apply):

X No underground storage tanks are involved. 'New underground storage tanks will be installed. Existing tanks on the project site will be removed. Ensure regulatory agency has been notified Contamination does not exist. - Contamination exists. - Contamination unknown. - Existing tanks on the project site to be retained.

17 Air Installation Compatible Use Zone (AFI 32-7063): X Facility is sited in compliance with Air Installation Compatible Use Zone Study. No noise level reduction is required.

Facility is sited in compliance with Air Installation Compatible Use Zone Study. Noise level reduction of will be provided in design and construction. - Noise waiver request is being processed. - Noise waiver has been granted. -

18. Base Comprehensive Plan (AFI 32-7062): X Facility is sited in accordance with the General Plan and is within a compatible land use area. -

Facility is not sited in accordance with the General Plan and is not within a compatible land use area for the following reason:

Page No. 8

DCN:11701

CECBlWimberleyl2 lMarO5/d:\l5-Projects\l39 1 s\95-3220-05032 1 M&I Facility.doc I . COMPONENT 1 I 2. DATE

-

-

-

L

7 -

2

2

2


AIR FORCE (AETC)

11. Ex~loslves OuantitvlDistance Siting and Safetv Clearance Criteria: a. Projects (new construction, facility modification, or change in use) involving explosives storage or handling.

Explosives safety siting approval obtained on (date). - X Request for explosive safety siting approval sent to MAJCOM on (date). Expected approval date is

Request for WaiverIExemption sent to MAJCOM on (date). Expected approval date is - b. P ' t s not involving explosives (new construction, facility modification, or change in use).

Project is not sited within explosives clear zones. Explosives safety siting approval obtained on (date). - Request for explosive safety siting approval sent to MAJCOM on (date). Expected approval date is - Request for WaiverlExemption sent to MAJCOM on (date). Expected approval date is -



!2 Air Base Survivability. Conventional Hardening. Chemical Protection I_evels and Priorities. Camouflage. Concealment and Deception: X Project does not affect airbase operability

Facility I S sited or constructed in compliance with criteria contained in WMP-I - - Waiver or exemption required; request submitted to MAJCOM Civil Engineering Readiness Office, in accordance with WMP-I

Waiver or exemption granted on (date). -


4. PROJECT TITLE MUNITIONS MAINTENANCE AND INSPECTION FACT1 ,ITY

!3. Allowance for Physically Handicaoped. Project provides all design features for handicapped. -

X Project provides access and limited features. - Pro-ject provides access but no other features. D e s ~ g ~ i features for handicapped are not required. - Design features will not be provided for the following reason. - -

3 Real Estate Reclulrement(AFR 32-900 11: X Project does not require acquisition o f real estate interest.

Project requires acquisition of a real estate interest over $200,000. Land interest is to be acquired through minor land authority. - Other (explain): -

5. PROJECT NUMBER

MPY.1 95-37.3.0

5. AntiterrorismlForce Protection: Antiterrorisdforce protection measures included in this project are based on a completed installation terrorist threat assessment and a completed Command or Joint Staff Installation Vulnerability Assessment. - Antiterrorismlforce protection measures included in this project satisfy requirements established by a completed installation Physical

X Security and Force Protection Plan (DoD 2000.16. Standard 15). Project meets or exceeds the requirements of DoD Antiterrorism Construction Standards.


(CONTINUED) 19. Airfield Clearance Criterla (AFI 32-1026):

X Facility IS in compliance with airfield clearance criteria, including clear zone, accident potential zones and airfield airspace (height obstruction) cr~teria and poses no potential threat to flight safety. - A request for waiver to airfieldlairspace clearance criteria is being prepared. Expected completion date is -

- A temporary waiver for construction activity in the airtield vicinity was approved on (date) A permanent waiver of airfieldlairspace clearance criteria was obtained on (date). -

20 Atr Space Use. X Project does not affect air space use and does not require submittal of FAA Form 7460-1 to the Regional Office of the FAA. - - Project sent to Regional FAA on (date). Obstruc~ion marking and lighting recommendations are included in the project.

6. Excess Soace. X Excess space is not available to satisfy the requirement. -

7. Temvorary Facilities: X Temporary facilities are not required for this project.

Temporary facilities are required for this project and will be demolished upon completion. -

DCN:11701

AIR FORCE I (computer generated) 3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION

CECB/Winiberley/2 1 MarOS/d:\l5-Projects\l391 s\95-3220-05032 1 M&I Facility.doc


MUNITIONS MAINTENANCE AND I

2. DATE I . COMPONENT FY 2007 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA

FOR CRITICAL PLANNING ACTIONS (CONTINUED)

INSPECTION FACILITY

28 Commun~cations and Information Support

MPYJ 95-3220

The conimunicat~ons equipment, information technology systems, pewiring costs, and other requirements for this project have been identified and are included in the project cost estimate and all other applicable project documents. A copy of the commun~cation cost

X estimate is attached to the DD 1391.

CERTIFICATE 01: COMPLIANCE

29 Enerev and Water Conservation. X Proiect complies with the minimum energy and water conservation performance standards. -

30 S e ~ s m ~ c Considerations. X Seismic planning and design complies with TI 809-04.

Seismic evaluat~ons performed for existing fac~lities. Seismic deficiencies identified by the seismic evaluations are mitigated by project completion.

3 1 .loint Use Cert~fication (include selection on DD Form 1391): X Mission requirements, operational considerations, and location are incompatible with use by other components

This is an installation utilitylinfrastructure project, and does not qualify forjoint use at this location. However, all tenants on this installation are benefited by this project. This facility can be used by other components on an "as available" basis; however. the scope o f the project is based on Air Force requirements. This facility is programmed for joint use with (identify the component the facility is jointly used with); however, it is fully funded by the Air Force. The facility is programmed for joint use with (identify the component(s) the facility is jointly used with) and is conjunctively funded by (identify the participating component(s):l

12 Susrarnable Desian and Development: X Project includes sustainable development concepts.

Project will qualify for LEEDTM certification. Prqject does not include sustainable development concepts

concur with the above statements.

J A R Y KAY HERTOG :olonel, USAF :ommander, 37 TRW

Date

DD Form 1391c Page No. 10 CECB/Wimberley/21Mar05/d:\l5-Projects\l391 s\95-3220-05032 1 M&I Facility.doc

DCN:11701

I . COMPONENT

AIR FORCE

ITEM STAGING AND INSPECTION FACILITY

WAREHOUSEIINSPECTION FACILITY ANTITERRORISMIFORCE PROTECTION (0.5%)

SUPPORTING FACILITIES SOILS ANALYSIS AND REMOVAL SITE IMPROVEMENTS PAVEMENTSIACCESS UTILITIES

SUBTOTAL CONTINGENCY (5.0%) TOTAL CONTRACT COST SUPERVISION, INSPECTION AND OVERHEAD (5.794) TOTAL REQUEST TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED) OTHER APPROPRIATIONS (FURNITURE, EQUIPMENT)

5. PROGRAM ELEMENT

7.28.96 'ES

UIM


QUANTITY

1,673

2. DATE


LACKLAND TRAINING ANNEX. TEXAS

9. COST ESTIMA'I

6. CATEGORY CODE

422-277

UNIT COST

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION JOINT MUNITIONS STAGING1

INSPECTION FACILITY

COST ($000) 3,620

(3,602) ( 18) 1,24 1

( 100) ( 380) ( 380) ( 380) 4,861

243 5,104

29 1 5,395 5,400

( 68)

7. PROJECT NUMBER MCP

MPYJ 04-3225

10. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION: Concrete foundation and floor slab, structural steel framing, and a standing seam metal roof. One-story structure with built in scale, electric roll-LIP doors for warehouse service, marshalling office, and holding area with electric gates. Project includes soils analysis and hauling, site improvements, pavements, interior and area lighting, lightning and fire protection systems, and all necessary utilities. Air Conditioning: 20 KW 11 . REQUIREMENT: 1,673 SM; ADEQUATE: 0 SM; SUBSTANDARD: 0 SM PROJECT: Construct munitions staginglinspection facility (Current Mission)

8. PROJECT COST ($000) EEIC: 321

5,400

REQUIREMENT: A modern, properly sized, all weather flight line munitions holding, staging and inspection point facility capable of 24-hour a day operation to provide munitions from the munitions storage site at Medina Annex to aircraft at the Kelly Field Annex runway. Facility will also require adequate area lighting, lightning and fire protection systems for the successful accomplishment of the munitions mission.

CURRENT SITUATION: This munitions staginglinspection facility supports worldwide deployment of Standard Air Munitions Packages (STAMP) and Standard Tanks, Racks, Adapters, and Pylon Packages (STRAPP) war munitions. As the Air Force transitions to an Air Expeditionary Force posture rapid deployment of STAMPISTRAPP is essential to successful mission accomplishment. The current lack of this facility forces continual wasted travel back and forth from the Medina Annex to the Kelly Field runway to retrieve pallets for air shipments. Added manpower and travel requirements delay the operation and jeopardize the timely execution of wartime missions. Lighting is poor and inclement weather protection is non-existent.

IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED: Without this facility, both wartime and peacetime operations will continue in makeshift roadside loading and crowded travel lanes within the munitions compound at the Medina Annex. STAMPISTRAPP munitions deliveries to critical cargo aircraft will continue to delayed as crews repeatedly [ravel back and forth to the flightline for necessary equipment and accessories. Munitions personnel will :ontinue to be subjected to needlessly dangerous conditions and procedures. Ultimately, the deployment of war nunitions will continue to be severely handicapped.

DCN:11701

ADDITIONAL: This project meets the criterialscope specified in AFH 32-1084, "Standard Facility Requirements. " All known alternative options including conversion, leasing and status quo were considered during the development of this project. No other option other than new construction could meet mission requirements; therefore, a Certificate of Exception has been performed.

BASE CIVIL ENGINEER: Lt Col Jeffry D. Knippel, Conlmercial 210-671-2977, FAX 210-671-4074 Elnail to: jeffi.v.knippel@,Iackland.af.mil

(JOINT MUNITIONS STAGINGIINSPECTION FACILITY 1,673 SM = 18,000 SF)

I

DD Form 139 1 Page No. 1 CECB/Witnberley/22Mar05/d:\I 5-Projects\ 139 1 s\04-3225-050322 JI Faci1ity.doc

DCN:11701

I . COMPONENT

AIR FORCE


REQUIREMENTS CALCULATION



4. PROJECT TITLE

JOINT MUNITIONS STAGINGIINSPECTION FACILITY

Flight Line Munitions Holding Point 422-277 (AFH 32-1084, Chap 9, Para 9.5.7)

2. DATE

5. PROJECT NUMBER

MPYJ 04-3225

I I

Total TMIGW Maint. Shop 1 1,673.0 1 18,000

Space Criteria

DD Form 1391 CECB/Wimberleyl22Mar05/d:\15-Projects\l39 1 s\04-3225-050322 JI Facility.doc

Component

Warehouse (Pallets, Netting, etc.)

Covered Marshalling Pad

Marshalling Office

Latrines

MechIElcclTelecomm (1 0%)

Page No. 2

Net Area Square meters

1230.0

278.8

18.7

18.7

126.8

Square feet 13,240

3,000

200

200

1,360

DCN:11701

2. DATE I . COMPONENT

AIR FORCE


I EXISTING FACILITIES/DEFICIENCY DETAIL DATA SHEET


FY 2007 MILITARY CONSTKUCTION PROJECT DATA (computer generated)

4. PROJECT TITLE


SCOPE OF FY 04 REQUEST: 1,673 SM

REOUIREMENTS COMPUTATIONS REOUIREMENTSIASSETS Mission: Basic Training Wing a. Total Requirement

Technical Training Wing b. Existing Substandard Defense Language Institute c. Existing Adequate Inter American Air Forces Academy d. Funded Not in Inventory

e. Adequate Assets (c+d) f. Included in FY04 Program g. Deficiency (a-e-f)

Re~uirement: See Calculations Page

5. PROJECT NUMBER

MPYJ 04-3225

Scope 0 1,673

0 0 0 0 0

1,673

NBR OF BLDGS

1 0 0 0 0 0 1

Current Mission/New Mission Analysis: Current Mission = 1000,6

b. Existing Substandard: 0 SM CAI' SCOPE TOTAL CONDITY PE CODE NOMENCLATUREIBLDG NBR BLDG (SM) Y EARICODEICONST REMARKS

c. Existing Adequate: 0 SM CAT SCOPE TOTAL CONDITYPE CODE NOMENCLATUREIBLDG NBR BLDG (SM) YEARKODEICONST REMARKS

g. Deficiency: 1,673 SM CAT SCOPE TOTAL CONDITYPE

CODE NOMENCLATUREIBLDG NBR BLDG (SM) YEARICODEICONST REMARKS

DD Form 1391 Page No. 3 CECB/Wi1nberley/22Mar05/d:\15-Projects\l39 1 s\04-3225-050322 JI Facility.doc

DCN:11701

1 . 2. DATE COMPONENT FY 2007 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA

(computer generated) AIR FORCE


LACKLAND AIR FORCE BASE. TEXAS 4. PROJECT TITLE 5. PROJECT NUMBER

JOINT MUNITIONS STAGING/INSPECTION FACILITY MPYJ 04-3225

COST DETERMINATION

Project Summary Sheet I I I I I I

Project Name: Munitions Maintenance and Inspection Faality Building Number: NEW Proiect Location: I Lackland Trainina Annex. TX I I Project Scope: 1,6731 SM

FROM OSD PRlCl NG GUl DE Facility Type / FLT LN MUNS HLD PNT I Category Code 422-277 ACF (From Tab ACF): 0.82 Size Adjustment Factor (From Tab SAF) 0.92 Unit Cost: 1 $2,147.401 Maximum Unit Cost

I I I

COST ESTIMATE SCOPE UNIT COST COST ($000)

PRl MARY FACI UTI ES 2,724 Flt In Muns Hld Pnt 1,673 $1,620.00 2,710 Anti-terrorisndForce Protection 0.5 % 14

SUPPORTING FACILITIES 2,100 Tel ecomrnunicat ions LS 450 Soi Is Analysis and Removal LS 110 Site Improvements LS 480 Pavements LS 560 Utilities LS 500

Subtotal 4,824 Contingency 5.0 % - 241

1 Total Contract Costs 5,065 Supervision Inspection & Overhead 5.7 % - 289

/Total Request 5,354 I Total Request (Rounded) 1 5,4001

Other Appropriations (Furniture, Equipment)

1 Total Project Cost 1 5,4501

DD Form 139 1 c Page No. 4

DCN:11701

CECB/Wimberley/22Mar05/d:\15-Projects\l391 s\04-3225-050322 JI Facility.doc I .COMPONENT

AIR FORCE (AETC)

LACKLAND AIR FORCE BASE. TEXAS

Coordination:

4. PROJECT TITLE


TRAINING ANNEX (MEDINA) i


FY 2007 CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA (computer generated)

5. PROJECT NUMBER

MPYJ 04-3225

37 CESICEV (Environmental) Date

2. DATE

37 CESICEF (Fire Dept) Date

37 CESICommunity Planner Date

SITE LOCATION PLAN

Approval:

Base Civil Engineer Date

37 SPTGICC Date

--

Page No. 5 DD Form 1391

DCN:11701

I . COMPONENT AIR FORCE 1 FY 2007 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA

(A ETC) (computer generated) 3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION


JOINT MUNITIONS STAGINGIINSPECTION FACILITY MPYJ 04-3225 C E R T I F I C A T E OF C O M P L I A N C E

F O R C R I T I C A L P L A N N I N G A C T I O N S

Command: AIR FORCE EDUCATION AND TRAINING CORlRlAND (AETC) Base, State, Country if Overseas: LACKLAND AFB, TX

I . INSTRUCTIONS: Place one X in the most appropriate response for each topic area to show current status of compliance. When responding to a statement requiring additional data, till in the blank with appropriate information. If none of the printed statements are appropriate, add or attach an appropriate comment. For MILCON projects, the Civil Engineering Squadron Commander and installation commander must sign the certificate and submit it to the MAJCOM staff where it will be updated, retained and be readily available if required by HQ USAF.

I I PLANNING. I. Env~ronrnental Impact Analysis Process (AFI 32-7061):

Categorical exclusion number applies. - Environmental Assessment under preparation. Expected completion date is

X Findlng of No Significant Environmental Impact signed on Aprll 2001 (date). - Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) under preparatiorl. Expected completion date is Draft EIS filed on (date). - Final EIS filed on (date). - Record of decision filed on (date) Foreign nation or protected global resource exemption number applies. Environmental study (or review underway) under preparation. Expected completion date is - Environmental study (or review) completed on (date). Finding of "No Practical Alternative" signed (date)

2 Wetlands (AI71 32-7064). X Project is not sited in a wetland.

Requirements of Clean Water Act, Section 404 & 401 in progress. Expected completion date is (date) - Requirements of Clean Water Act, Section 404 & 401 completed on (date). Section 404 & 401 Permits issued (date). - Finding of "No Practical Alternative" signed (date). -

3. Flood plains (AFI 32-7064): X Project is not sited in a 100-year flood plain.

Requirements of EO 11988 in progress. Expected completion date is Project is sited in a 100-year flood plain. Requirements of EO 11988 completed on (date). Finding of "No Practical Alternative" signed (date).

I. Coastal Zone Management (AFI 32-70641: X Project does not directly affect a state coastal zone. -

Cons~stency determination being developed. Expected completion date is Consistency determination completed on (date). -

5 Coastal Barrier Resources (AFI 32-7064L X Project is not sited within the Coastal Barrier Resources System. -

Project exempt from the Coastal Barrier Resources Act (CBRA). Consultation with the Regional Director, United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), in progress. Estimated completion date is Consultation with the Regional Director, USFWS, concluded - (date). -

Threatened and Endaneered Species (AFI 32-7064): X Project has no potential for affecting threatened or endangered specles or critical habitats.

Based on consultation w ~ t h USFWS or host nation liaison on (date), threatened or endangered species in the vicin~ty of the project will not be affected. Consultation with USFWSNMFS underway in accordance with the Endangered Species Act. Formal consultation with the Regional Director, USFWS completed on (date). - Biological Assessment is required. Estimated completion date is Biological opinion issued by USFWS on (date). -

1 Form 1391 Page No. 6

DCN:11701


CECB/Wi1nberley/22Mar05/d:\15-Projects\l391~\04-3225-050322 JI Facility.doc

4. PROJECT TITLE


5. PROJECT NUMBER

MPYJ 04-3225


(A ETC)


(CONTINUED) 7 Cultural Resource Management (AFI 32-7065).



Properties affected by project are addressed in a Programmatic Agreement that was fully executed with the State Historic - Preservation Officer and the ACHP on (date).

- Project area has not been surveyed for historic properties. Survey requirements are identified in the A-106 system and the estimated completion date is

X Prqject area has been surveyed and no historic properties were identitied. The State Historic Preservation Officer was notified by - letter dated Survey identified historic properties but the project will have no effect on them; written concurrence by the State Historic Preservatio - Officer 1s dated After consultation, State Historic Preservation Officer concurred that the project will have no adverse effect on historic properties. - The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation concurred in writing with this determination on (date). Project will have an adverse effect on historic properties. A memorandum of agreement (MOA) mitigating the adverse effect was - executed on (date). Estimated date to execute the MOA is or No MOA was developed and the formal comments of the Council were - sought In a memo dated Project w ~ l l affect a site or property of interest to Native Americans. - Appropriate Native American Tribe or Group contacted on (date) -

8. ln tera~encv and Intergovernmental Coordination for Environmental Planning (AFI 32-7060): X Coordination of proposed project with the state Single Point of Contact or other agencies is not required. -

Coordmation with the state Single Point of Contact is in progress. Expected date o f completion is - Proposed project was coordinated with the state Single Point of Contact or other agencies on - (Speci@ any other agencies).

9. Environmental Permits (AFls 32-7040. 7041. 7042. 7044): X No permits are required.

No permits required, but regulatory agency not~fication required prior to construction (e.g. underground storage tank removals) - The following permits are required prior to construction: (List the construction and operating permits) -

0 I'otenl~allv Rentilated Substances (AFls 32-1052. 7042L

a. Asbestos: X not present; survey underway; -

present; scheduled for removal as required by applicable state regulations.

b. Lead-Based Paint: not present; survey underway; -

X present; (Describe mitigation.) Building components that must be removed will be classified for proper disposal mitlgation is not necessary as insufficient quantities exist to require mitigation -

c. Ozone depleting substance: X not present; survey underway;

present, (Describe mitlgation, or state why mitigation is not necessary.)

d I'olychlorinated biphenvls (PCBs): X not present; survey underway; -

present; (Describe mitigation, or state why mitigation is not necessary.) - e. Radon:

X not present; - survey underway; - present; (Describe mitigation, or state why mitigation is not necessary.)

f. Other known hazardous or toxic substances and uollutants: (e.g. contaminated soils) X not present; survey underway; -

present; scheduled for removal as required by applicable state regulations.

Page No. 7

DCN:11701

CECB/Wi1nberley/22Mar05/d:\15-Projects\l391s\04-3225-050322 JI Facility.doc I . COMPONENT

AIR FORCE (A ETC) (computer generated)


2. Environmental Restoration Program (ERP): X Facility is not sited on or near an ERP site. -

F a c ~ l ~ t y is sited near an ERP site. Approximately feet away. - Facil~ty is on an ERP site -

A Request for Waiver was submitted to MAJCOM on (date). - The site is projected to be remediated andlor closed out on (date), prior to commencement of construction activities. The nature of the site contamination does not preclude the type of construction activity proposed. There is a Compliance Agreement associated with this site A Remedial Investigation Feasibility Study was completed on (date) to accurately delineate the aerial extent o f the contamination.



4. PROJECT TITLE


3. Air Pollutants (AFI 32-7040). X W ~ l l not be generated by the operation or construction of this facility.

Will be generated by the operation or construction of this facility. (describe type and amount o f substance expected to be generated, existing control systems, and the need for additional controls). Conformity deternunation required.

X Conformity determination not required. - I Water Pollutants (AFI 32-7041):

X Facility will not generate water pollutants. - X Facility construction will not cause soil erosion. -

Facility will generate water pollutants. Describe type and amount along with minimization, treatment, and disposal plan. Facility construction will cause erosion and require an erosion control plan.

i. Solid and Hazardous Wastes (AFI 32-7042. 32-7080): X Facility will not be used for managing solid or hazardous wastes. -

Fac~lity will be for managing solid or hazardous wastes. - I . Underground Storage Tanks (AF132-7044) (Check all that apply):

X No underground storage tanks are involved. - New underground storage tanks will be installed. Existing tanks on the project site will be removed. Ensure regulatory agency has been notified. Contamination does not exist. - Contamination exists. Contamination unknown. Existing tanks on the project site to be retained.

7 Air Installation Compatible Use Zone (AFI 32-7063): X Facility is sited in compliance with Air Installation Compatible Use Zone Study. No noise level reduction is required. -

Facility is sited in compliance with Air Installation Compatible Use Zone Study. Noise level reduction of will be prov~ded in design and construction. - Noise waiver request is being processed. -

2. DATE

5 . PROJECT NUMBER

MPYJ 04-3225

N o ~ s e waiver has been granted. - 18. Base Comprehensive Plan (AFI 32-7062):

X Facil~ty is sited in accordance with the General Plan and is within a compatible land use area. - Facil~ty 1s not sited in accordance with the General Plan and is not within a compatible land use area for the following reason:


(CONTINUED) I . Radon at New Construction Sites:

X Not Present. - present; (Describe mitigation, or state why mitigation is not necessary.)

ID Form 1391 Page No. 8

DCN:11701

3 , INSTALLATION AND LOCATION

CECB/Winiberley/22Mar05/d:\15-Projects\l39 1 s\04-3225-050322 JI Facility.doc


(CONTINUED) 19 Airfield Clearance Criteria (AFl 32-1026):

X Facility is in compliance with airfi eld clearance criteria, including clear zone, accident potential zones and airfield airspace (height obstruction) criteria and poses no potential threat to flight safety. - A request for waiver to airfield/airspace clearance criteria is being prepared. Expected completion date is - A temporary waiver for construction activity in the airfield vicinity was approved on (date). - A permanent waiver of airfieldla~rspace clearance criteria was obtained on (date). -

20 Air Space Use: X Prqject does not affect a n space use and does not require submittal of FAA Form 7460-1 to the Regional Office of the FAA. -

Project sent to Regional FAA on (date). Obstruction marking and lighting recommendations are included in the project -


(A ETC)


21. Exvloslves OuantitvIDistance Siting and Safety Clearance Criteria: a. Projects (new construction, facility modification, or change in use) involvmg explosives storage or handling.

Explosives safety siting approval obtained on (date) - X Request for explosive safety siting approval sent to MAJCOM on (date). Expected approval date is

Request for WaiverIExemption sent to MAJCOM on (date). Expected approval date is - b I w t s not ~nvolving explosives (new construction, facility moditication, or change in use)

Prqject is not s ~ t e d wi th~n explosives clear zones. - Explos~ves safety siting approval obtained on (date). - Request for explosive safety siting approval sent to MAJCOM on (date). Expected approval date is Request for WaiverIExemption sent to MAJCOM on (date). Expected approval date is -


4. PROJECT TITLE

!2. Air Base Survivabilitv. Conventional Hardening. Chemical Protection Levels and Priorities. Camouflage, Concealment and Deceution: X Project does not affect airbase operability -

Facility is sited or constructed in compliance with criteria contained in WMP-1. - Waiver or exemption required; request submitted to MAJCOM Civil Engineering Readiness Office, in accordance with WMP-I . - Waiver or exemption granted on (date). -

!3 Allowance for Phvsically Handicapped: Project provides all design features for handicapped. -

X Project provides access and limited features. Project provides access but no other features. Design features for handicapped are not required. - Design features will not be provided for the following reason: -

4. Real Estate Requirement(AFR 32-900 1 ): X Project does not require acquisition of real estate interest. -

Project requires acquisition o f a real estate interest over $200,000. Land interest is to be acquired through minor land authority. - Other (explain): -

5. PROJECT NUMBER

5 Ant~terrorlsmlForce Protection: Antiterror~smlforce protection measures included in this project are based on a completed installation terrorist threat assessment and a completed Command or Joint Stafflnstallation Vulnerability Assessment. - Anllterrorism/force protection measures included in this project satisfy requirements established by a completed installation Phys~cal

X Security and Force Protection Plan (DoD 2000.16. Standard 15). - Project meets or exceeds the requirements of DoD Antiterrorism Construction Standards. ,

6 Excess Space: X Excess space is not available to satisfy the requirement. -

7 , Temporary Facilities: X Temporary facilities are not required for this project.

Temporary facilities are required for this project and will be den~olished upon completion -

Page No. 9

DCN:11701

AIR FORCE I (computer generated) 3 . INSTALLATION AND LOCATION

CECBlWimberley/22MarO5/d:\1 5-Projects\] 391 s\04-3225-050322 J1 Facility.doc I . COMPONENT


FOR CRITICAL PLANNING ACTIONS (CONTINUED)

28 Conimunications and Information Support:


4. PROJECT TITLE


The communications equipment, information technology systems, prewiring costs, and other requirements for this project have been identified and are included in the project cost estimate and all other appl~cable project documents. A copy of the commun~cation cost

X estimate is attached to the D D 1391.

2. DATE

5 . PROJECT NUMBER

MPYJ 04-3225

29 Enerov and Water Conservation: X Prolect complies with the minimum energv and water conservation performance standards. -

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

30. Seismic Considerations: X Seismic planning and design complies with TI 809-04.

Seismic evaluations performed for existing facilities. Seismic defic~encies identified by the seismic evaluations are mitigated by project completion.

3 1 . Joint Use Certification (include selection on DD Form 1391): X Mission requirements, operational considerations, and location are incompatible with use by other components.

This is an ~nstallation utility/infrastructure project, and does not qualify forjoint use at this location. However, all tenants on this installation are benefited by this project. T h ~ s facility can be used by other components on an "as available" basis; however, the scope of the project is based on Air Force requirements. This fac~lity is programmed forjoint use with (identify the component the facility is jointly used with); however, it is fully funded by the Air Force. The facil~ty is programmed for joint use with (ideniitji the component(s) the facility is jointly used with) and is con.junctively fi~nded by (~dentify the participating component(s)).

\2. Sustainable Design and Development: X Project includes sustainable development concepts.

Project will qualify for LEEDTM certification. Project does not include sustainable development concepts

c o n c u r with t h e a b o v e s t a t e m e n t s .

dARY KAY HERTOG :olonel, USAF :omrnander, 37 TRW

Date

DD Form 1391c Page No. 1 0 CECB/Wimberley/22Mar05/d:\15-Projects\l391s\04-3225-050322 JI Facility.doc

DCN:11701

BULLET BACKGROUND PAPER

SDB PROGRAM FUNDING FOR MODULAR STORAGE MAGAZINES

PURPOSE

This paper provides justification for using Small Diameter Bomb (SDB) program funds for the construction of three (3) Modular Storage Magazines (MSM) in the 651 MUNS Munitions Storage Area.

BACKGROUND

- Properly sized and configured munitions storage facilities are required to support the new Standard Air Munitions Packages (STAMP) mission for SDB assets. STAMP assets are War Reserve Materiel munitions available for shipment to combat units involved in contingencies worldwide.

DISCUSSION

- Current facilities in use with little modification or funding since originally built in 1954.

- 65 1 MUNS already stores new weapons such as the AIM-9X, the Joint Standoff Weapon and the Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile; scheduled to receive SDB in FY 08.

- SDB STAMP assets packaged in a pre-loaded configuration inside a 12-foot long container, as well as individual bombs.

- Igloos inefficient for storing large containers. Due to arched ceiling and narrow doors, cannot support the increased width of the new SDB packaging.

- Currently large weapons stored using workarounds that create unsafe conditions for personnel and increased risk of damage to equipment.

- Adapting current workarounds to SDB will further increase hazards.

- Failure to fund adequate SDB storage facilities could result in costly fielding delays and possible damage to containers and/or assets due to handling requirements.

- Wide doors and straight walls of MSMs reduce handling, increase safety and efficiency of transport preparation, and allow greater consolidation of assets in storage.

RECOMMENDATION: AFMC request SDB program funding for MSMs at 65 1 MUNS to ensure unit ability to support SDB mission requirements.

DCN:11701


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON MAINTENANCE AND INSPECTION FACILITY

PURPOSE

This paper outlines projected increases in productivity following construction of the new Maintenance and Inspection (M+I) facility.

BACKGROUND

- Properly sized and configured munitions bays are required to support the Standard Air Munitions Packages (STAMP) mission. A new facility with twice the bay size will hold 2 times the Net Explosive Weight and allow concurrent operations, doubling peak capacity.

DISCUSSION

- Time to inspect and test munitions estimated to be cut in half with new facility.

- Old facility plagued with problems associated with a structure of its age

- Unreliable electrical system prevents use of test sets with specific power requirements

- Many days unworkable due to flooding inside current building

- No drive through capability increases time spent moving munitions within bay

- 651'' Munitions squadron's expected growth through fiscal year 07 is 7,744 assets

- Reason: Davs/ Man hours lost Fornzula Used Flooding in bays 1512 160 1 Sdays x 18people x 8hrs = time Degraded electrical 1011440 1 Odays x 1 8people x 8hrs = time Total lost 2513600

- Reason: Man hours gained Forrnula Used Two Bays 10,400 260days x Speople x 8hrs = time Drive through 12,168 260days x 18people x 2.6hrs = time Total 22,568

- Total potential man hours gained is 26,168, Formula used is: 3600L + 22,568t

RECOMMENDATION: AFMC Seek funding for new M+I Facility to ensure 65 1 MUNS ability to support mission requirements.

DCN:11701


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON JOINT INSPECTION FACILITY

PURPOSE

This paper outlines projected increases in productivity following construction of the new Joint Inspection (JI) facility.

BACKGROUND

- A covered area with adjoining storage is required to support the Standard Air Munitions Packages (STAMP) mission. Artificial lighting and covered spacing will enable the potential for 24 hour operations in any weather. Storage will allow more efficient access to essential pallet build up materials.

DISCUSSION

- Joint Inspection process with new facility will be carried out as follows:

- Pallets, chains, binders, tie downs, nets and plastic covers will be kept at the JI facility instead of Kelly USA (7 mile distance)

- Upon notification of a pending shipment all needed supplies will be transported from the facility to the build-up locations (less than 1 mile distance)

- Once pallets are built and loaded on trucks, they will be moved to JI facility pending joint inspection of STAMPISTRAPP packages with Munitions and ATOC personnel

- All documents and munitions will be checked for discrepancies

- A dedicated JI facility with covered storage and admin facilities will allow all errors to be corrected on the spot, eliminate lost time due to lighting, and will be equipped with L.P.S

- Vehicles will then be driven to Kelly flight-line to be loaded on transport

- Time Savings

Reason Man Hours Retrieve pallets 40 5people x 2hrs x 4days =time Break down 108 36trucks x 3people x lhour =time 24 hr Lighting 16640 260days x 8people x 8hrs =time Total 16788

DCN:11701

DCN:11701

Selected STAMPISTRAPP BRAC Data for Mr Art Beauchamp:

STAMPISTRAPP Equipment:

STAMPISTRAPP required equipment:

- - I - I d

1 Load Ramo 3 7

Type 1 Authorized I Assigned LITE ALL

I I -

STAMPISTRAPP Pallet build equipment:

7

Pallet Scales ( Pallet Jack

3

I Dunnage 5,400 5,400 1

3

I 5

Type 4631, Pallets Side Nets Top Nets Chains Binders

STAMP Precision Guided Munitions Test Equipment:

3 5

Authorized 1,800 3,600 1,800

17,648 8.71 1

Assigned 827

1,058 3 79

11,385 5 R44

Missile Test Sets ANIDSM-129 ANIDSM-787 ANIDSM- 157 TS-4044 AID

GCU-30lE ANIGY Q 79

TTU-574 ANIGSM 396lC

CFMREANIGYQ-75A TTU-373 C/E ANIGJM-65

CU-2452 Test Set Coupler SM-860A IR Simulator

Calibrator Elect Altimeter

Authorized 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2

Assigned 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2

Missile Supported AGM-65 AGM-65 AGM-65 AIM-9 AIM-9

AIM-9X 1 JSOW AIM-9X / JSOW

AGM-88 AIM- 120

CCGS AGM-130 AGM-130 AGM-130 AGM-130

DCN:11701


HOIST BEAM HUNTER MECHANICAL

1 1

DCN:11701


STAMPISTRAPP Manpower Data:

65 1 Munitions Squadron Active Duty Manpower Data:

SKILL LEVEL I AUTH ASSIGNED 9 0 0

Projected Manpower increases at McConnell AFB, KS:

AGR Traditional Guardsmen

Current Authorizations 2 5 30

Projected Authorizations 8 0 105

DCN:11701

Selected STAMPISTRAPP BRAC Data for Mr Art Beauchamp: DCN:11701


BLDG #

440

44 1 TOTALS

509 Gate 19

TOTALS

1530

I TYPE I R R A P P a l l

TYPE

Condemned

Condemned 2

GOV Pad GOV Pad

2

Warehouse

Validatec, 106.300 SF

- - - - I ----- -..a* Igloo Multicube Operating Facilities Inert Storage

(SF) REAL PROPERTY

7,616

7,616 15,232 22,500 60,000 82,500

71,936

86 EA (1 6 1,740 SF)

Admin Explosive Sited Pad GOV Parking Pad

0 0 0

STRAPP Warehouse

INSIDE SF

Hlstorlcal Facillty

Historical Facllity

2,000 SF 30,000 SF 8,000 SF

0 0 0

- - -

12,000 SF 22,000 SF 80,000 SF

0 71,936 SF 30' High Shelving

SF USED

SF REQ N.E.W.

SHORT TON

147.45

DCN:11701

Selected Munitions Acronyms:

ACP -Ammunition Control Point AGM, -Air to Ground Missile AIM -Air Intercept Missile AIM 9-Sidewinder AIM 120-AMRAAM AMRAAM-Advanced Medium Range Air to Air Missile AUR -All Up Round AURC -All Up Round Container CCG -Computer Control Group CIIC -Controlled Inventory Item Code CTK -Composite Tool Kit EOD -Explosive Ordnance Disposal GAP -Global Asset Positioning GBU -Guided Bomb Unit GCUIS -Guidance Control UnitISection IDS --Intrusion Detection System JDAM-Joint Direct Attack Munition JSOW-Joint Stand Off Weapon JASSM-Joint Air to Surface Standoff Missile LMR L a n d Mobile Radio LOGMOD -Logistics Module

..... ..,........ 8 LPS -Lighting Protection System MC2K Mun i t i ons Control 2000 MMHE -Munitions Material Handling Equipment MSA -Munitions Storage Area NEW-Net Explosive Weight O&M-Operations and Maintenance PGM-Precision Guided Munitions QA-Quality Assurance SDB-Small Diameter Bomb STAMP-Standard Air Munitions Package STRAPP-Standard Tank, Rack, Adapter, and Pylon Package STU-Secure Telephone Unit TAMP-Tactical Air Missile Program TMDE-Test, Measurement and Diagnostic Equipment TMRS-Tactical Munitions Records System T.O. Techn ica l Order TRAP-Tanks, Racks, Adapters and Pylons UTC-Unit Type Code WMP-War Mobilization Plan WM-War Reserve Materiel

DCN:11701

651 Munitions Squadron & 75 MXG (STAMPISTRAPP) Contact List:

NAME RANK - DSN E-MAIL

Susan Golding Col 777-7504 susan.noldin~(ii>,hill.af.mil

Earl Bennett Maj 473-4616 earl.bennett@lackland,af.~nil

Drew Wilson 1 Lt 473-4330 drew.wilsonG~lackland.af.mi1

Kellen Squires 2 Lt 473-0385 kellen.squires(i?,lackland.af.~nil

Yvonne Watts CMSgt 473-4330 won~~e.watts~~lacl~land.af.mil

DCN:11701


ON

STAMPISTRAPP EXPLOSIVE CONVOY OPERATIONS

PURPOSE

This paper provides Mr Art Beauchamp information on the explosive convoy operation required to move STAMP munitions from Medina Annex to the Lackland AFB Flightline.

BACKGROUND

- 65 1 MUNS stores munitions items in support of the Air Force War Mobilization Plan One, and is required to palletize standard munitions packages on 463L airlift pallets. The munitions storage area is located on Lackland Training Annex (Medina Annex), and munitions must be convoyed approximately 12 miles to the Lackland AFB Flightline over Texas highways.

DISCUSSION

37 TRW provides convoy support as written in the LAFB Installation Deployment Plan. - Six munitions vehicle augmentee drivers - Security Forces escorts for the entire convoy

The San Antonio Police Department also provides an escort from Gate 20 on Hwy 90 to the Growden Gate on Lackland AFB.

The 37 TRW also monitors the convoy from the Deployment Control Center (DCC), the 65 1 MUNS provides a liaison in the DCC.

All munitions vehicles are equipped with radio communication equipment, and high explosive or sensitive munitions are covered with tarps.

The 37 TRW Weapons Safety Office has approved the convoy route, and a safety representative accompanies all convoys.

All munitions storage areas routinely receive and out-ship munitions via commercial carrier over civilian highways.

RECOMMENDATION: None, for information only.

Maj Bennett/65 1 MUNS/CC/473-4616/[email protected]/erb/30 June 2005

DCN:11701

tab a. .itinerary tab b.. .briefing slides tab c/67531/metadc...inter american air forces academy d....

Documents