sustainable urban transport index bhopal. urban... · 2019-11-12 · comprehensive mobility plan -...

Sustainable Urban Transport Index

B H O PA L

2

Sustainable Urban Transport Index - SUTI

• A comprehensive framework to measure and monitor urban transport performance WRT

SDG

• Defines the status of the city transport WRT Indicators

• Comparison with other cities in the Asia – Pacific Region

• Monitor Progress

• An ongoing process – periodically to be carried out

• Collects data for comparative purposes

• Enables Identification of deficiencies

• Set targets

• Enables to identify good practices & lessons

• To receive feedback on indicators, Max-Min limits, Data base, Strategies

Presentation Structure

❑ City Overview

❑ Current Status of Urban Transport and Services

❑ Approach for SUTI Data Collection for Indicators

❑ SUTI Indicators Calculation

❑ Analysis of indicator

❑ Conclusion

Bhopal Urban Transport and Services


2.10 Lacs Highest Ridership

1.65 Lacs Average Daily Ridership

46937 Daily KM’s

900 Daily Trips

401 KM Route Length

15 Routes

287* Buses Current Bus Operations


BUS RAPID TRANSIT System

500m Interval – Utility Ducts

2.5m wide and 16m & 28m long - Bus Stop/Platform

3.35m each c/w – BRTS Bus Lane

24 Km – Corridor Length

Streets are brighter & safe

➢Launched on 27th Sept 2013, 05 Years before.

➢24 Km BRT Corridor connects 03 Railway Stations and 03 Bus Stations.

➢77 BRT Bus Stop integrated with Automatic Fare Collection System.

➢41 Bus Stops are now integrated with AFC system.

➢BRT was able to integrate city bus services due to proper design in respect of

integrated study,

➢BRT AC buses, Non AC Low Floor and Midi Buses are able to ply inside & outside of BRT

Corridor.

Approach for SUTI Data Collection

•Extent to which transport plans cover public transport, intermodal facilities and infrastructure for active modes

Indicator

• Modal share of active and public transport in commuting

Indicator

• Convenient access to public transport in commuting

Indicator

• Public transport quality and reliability

Indicator

• Traffic fatalities per 1,00,000 inhabitants

Indicator

• Affordability –travel costs as share of income

Indicator

• Operational costs of the public transport system

Indicator

• Investment in public transportation systems

Indicator

• Air quality (PM 10)

Indicator

• Greenhouse gas emissions from transport

Indicator

1 2 3

10

4 5

6 7 8 9

1Extent to which transport plans cover public transport, intermodal facilities and infrastructure for active modes


PROPSOSED CATEGORIES/TABLE FOR CALCULATING THIS INDICATOR (SEE SECTION 3.1 IN THE GUIDELINE)

Aspects Explanation Score

I) walking networksThe goals are ambitious, with much designation over city. The Comprehensive Mobility Plan -2031 for Bhopal Planning Area do envisages increased walking networks with secured new funding

3

II) cycling networksCycling networks are existing in present scenario, and plan foresees greater networks along major corridors allocated with phasing and have realistic budget

3

III) Intermodal transfer facilities

Seamless mobility has been a priority of the plan and factors leading to intermodal transfers like interchanges, integration of modes, fares and feeder services are given due consideration with secured new funding

3

IV) public transportPresent public transport mode share is not predominant and thus ambitious goals are indeed set with increased mode share and greater investments with secured funding is proposed in the plan

3

Total (sum) 12

RESULTS

Sr. No. IndicatorsNatural

WeightsNormalization

units MIN MAX


0 - 16 scale 0.1 0 16

Note: Decimal points used to allow reproduction in US format for report

2Modal share of active and public transport in commuting


PURPOSECOMMUTING

(Work and Education)

MODE Trip Rate Trips

a. Scheduled bus and minibus 0.278 560659

b. Train, metro, tram 0 0

c. Ferry 0 0

d. Other public 0 0

e. Public transport (a+b+c+d) 0.278 560659

f. Walking 0.52 1048189

g. Bicycle 0.05 97506

h. Active transport (f+g) 0.57 1145695

i. Passenger car 0.04 73129

j. Taxi 0 0

k. Motorcycle 0.3 609412

l. Scooter/moped 0 0

m. Para transit (unscheduled) 0.02 48753

n. Other motorized (trucks,etc) 0 0

o. Individual motorized (i+j+k+l+m+n) 0.36 731395

p. Total (e+h+o) 1.21 2437649

q. Public and active (e+h) 0.85 1706354

r. Modal share of active and public transport 70.0Sr. No. Indicators

NaturalWeights

Normalizationunits MIN MAX


% of trips

0.1 10 90


Comprehensive Mobility Plan (2012)Comprehensive Mobility Plan (2012)

Mode of Travel Total Trips Mode Share

Walk 1048189 43%

Cycle 97506 4%

2W 609412 25%

Auto 48753 2%

Car 73129 3%

Minibus 487530 20%

Standard Bus 73129 3%

3Convenient access to public transport in commuting

3

Network Length

(km)

Coverage area with a

buffer of 500m on

either side

(Km2)

Pop. Density

(inh/km2)

Inhabitants

#

370 290 5002 1452960

Total Population (2016) 2018000

% within 500m buffers 72

Methodology

1. Taz wise Population estimated

2. 370 Operational Stop location (2018) ;

3. Build buffer of 500m around the stop/stations

4. Calculated the % of population within the bufferof 500 m for SMC area

Results

Convenient access to public transport in commuting



units MIN MAX

3Convenient access to public transport service

% of population

0.1 20 100


4Public transport Quality and Reliability

Public transport Quality and Reliability 4Dissatisfied Satisfied

Dimension RESP SATISF

Frequency of the service 345 813 1158 70.2

Punctuality (delay) * 338 820 1158 70.8

Comfort and cleanliness of vehicles 336 822 115871.0

Safety of vehicles 350 808 1158 69.8

Convenience of stops/stations 315 843 1158 72.8

Availability of information 329 829 1158 71.6

Personnel courtesy 299 859 1158 74.2

Fare level 290 869 1158 75.0

Responses 2601 6663 9264 71.9



units MIN MAX

4 Public transport quality and reliability % satisfied 0.1 30 95


RESULTS

User Satisfaction Report_MoHUA, 2017

Source: User Satisfaction Report, MoHUA, 2017

5Traffic fatalities per 1,00,000 inhabitants

Traffic fatalities per 1,00,000 inhabitants 5Fatalities Number

Road transport 252

Railway transport 0

Tram 0

Ferryboats 0

Other 0

Total 252

Inhabitants 2018000

Fatalities/100,000 inhabitants 12

Status of Fatalities and Serious Injuries over the period



units MIN MAX

5 Traffic fatalities per 100.000 inhabitants # fatalities 0.1 10 0


Year 2017 fatalities

Source: http://www.morth.nic.in/sites/default/files/Road_Accidents_in_India_2017.pdf

6Affordability – travel costs as share of income

Affordability – travel costs as share of income 6Services

Monthly Ridership

Market shares Single ticket

price Monthly cost

(60 tickets)Weighted

monthly cost

City Bus 83901 50.8 12 690 351

BRT 81099 49.2 14 810 398

Total 165000 100 0 749

Mean household income 15,000Affordability

5.0

Source: https://smartcities.data.gov.in/catalog/public-transport-accessibility-http://mybusbhopal.in/http://www.sutpindia.com/skin/pdf/BCLL%20Presentation-04092017_1.pdfUser Satisfaction Report_MoHUA, 2017



units MIN MAX


% of income

0.1 35 3.5


https://smartcities.data.gov.in/catalog/public-transport-accessibility-

http://mybusbhopal.in/

http://www.sutpindia.com/skin/pdf/BCLL%20Presentation-04092017_1.pdf

7Operational costs of the public transport system

Operational costs of the public transport system 7Services Fare Revenue Expenses Fare box ratio

Monthly Ridership

Share (%)

City bus 23,138,972 18,022,629 128% 83901 50.8

BRT 22,366,211 17,420,736 128% 81099 49.2

Total 45,505,183 35,443,364 128 1,65,000 100



units MIN MAX


Cost recovery

ratio0.1 22 100


Source: https://smartcities.data.gov.in/catalog/public-transport-accessibility-http://mybusbhopal.in/http://www.sutpindia.com/skin/pdf/BCLL%20Presentation-04092017_1.pdfBCLL Fare box revenue and opertional expenditure, 2019User Satisfaction Report_MoHUA, 2017

https://smartcities.data.gov.in/catalog/public-transport-accessibility-

http://mybusbhopal.in/

http://www.sutpindia.com/skin/pdf/BCLL%20Presentation-04092017_1.pdf

8Investment in public transportation systems

Investment in public transportation systems 8



units MIN MAX

8 Investment in public transportation systems% of total

invest-ment0.1 0 50


INVESTMENTS BY THE CITY

15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20 average

PUBLIC TRANSPORT FACILITIES (Rs in Lakhs) 4520.8 4027.3 350.0 727.7 698.7 2064.89TOTAL TRANSPORT (Rs in Lakhs) 28045.6 16969.3 5235.0 7600.2 10134.3 13596.89

SHARE (in %) 15.2

Source: Bhopal Municipal Budget 2016-2020

9Air quality (PM 10)

Air quality (PM 10) 9



Units MIN MAX

9 Air quality (pm10) μg/m3 0.1 150 10


Location PM10 (yearly mean)

Bhopal Planning Area 105

Total city population 2018000

Population weighted concentration 105

Source: BRTS presentation_Feb19, Computed by CSE from CPCB air quality data submitted to Rajya Sabha for 44 cities and CPCB the ENVIS centre

10Greenhouse gas emissions from transport

Greenhouse gas emissions from transport 10

GHG

Emissions

(CO+Co2)

Total Vehicle

(Passenger + Freight)

Tons/day 2410.96

Tons/year

(per capita) 0.44



units MIN MAX

10 Greenhouse gas emissions from transport Tons/cap 0.1 2.75 0


Year 2015 Total (tons/day)

ModesPM2.5 PM10 Nox CO CO2

Total Vehicles (Passenger +

Freight)4.79 5.07 8.49 109.59 2301.37

Source: http://www.urbanemissions.info/india-apna/bhopal-india/

InputsSr.

No.Indicators

Natural Weights

Range

units MIN MAX VALUE YEAR COMMENTS ABOUT DATA SOURCES OR ISSUES RELEVANT FOR INTERPRETATION

1

Extent to which transport plans cover public transport, intermodal facilities and infrastructure for active modes

0 - 16 scale

0.1 0 16

12 2031

Comprehensive Mobility Plan - Bhopal 2031, prepared in 2011 , Bhopal Municipal Corporation and DIMTS


% of trips 0.1 10 90

70 2012

Comprehensive Mobility Plan - Bhopal 2031, prepared in 2011 , Bhopal Municipal Corporation and DIMTS

3Convenient access to public transport service

% of population

0.1 20 100

72 2019

Calculated for Bhopal Planning Area , considering 370 bus stops along the operational routes.

4Public transport quality and reliability

% satisfied 0.1 30 9571.9 2017

User Satisfaction Report, Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs, GoI, prepared in 2017

5Traffic fatalities per 100.000 inhabitants

# fatalities 0.1 10 0

10 2017

Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, Road Accidents in India, prepared in 2017


% of income

0.1 35 3.55 2019

MyBus Bhopal - Ridership data (2019); User Satisfaction Report_MoHUA (2017) (average household income within Bhopal Planning Area)


Cost recovery

ratio0.1 22 100

100 2019BCLL Fare Box revenue and Operational Expenditure (2019)

8Investment in public transportation systems

% of total invest-ment

0.1 0 5015.2 2017-2019

Bhopal Municipal Budget from 2016 to 2020

9 Air quality (pm10) μg/m3 0.1 150 10105 2016

BRTS presentation_Feb19, Computed by CSE from CPCB air quality data submitted to Rajya Sabha for 44 cities and CPCB the ENVIS centre

10Greenhouse gas emissions from transport

Tons/cap 0.1 2.75 00.44 2015

Urban Emissions_India Apna for Bhopal

Outputs

C1 RESULT SPIDER DIAGRAM

1Extent to which transport plans cover public transport, intermodal

facilities and infrastructure for active modes75.00

2 Modal share of active and public transport in commuting

75.00

3 Convenient access to public transport service

65.00

4 Public transport quality and reliability

64.50

5 Traffic fatalities per 100.000 inhabitants

1.00

6 Affordability – travel costs as part of income

95.26

7 Operational costs of the public transport system

100.00

8 Investment in public transportation systems

30.37

9 Air quality (PM10)

32.14

10 Greenhouse gas emissions from transport

84.14

SUTI INDEX RESULTGeometric mean – 42.33

0.00

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.00

50.00

60.00

70.00

80.00

90.00

100.00

1. Extent to which transportplans cover public

transport, intermodalfacilities and infrastructure

for active modes

2. Modal share of activeand public transport in

commuting

3. Convenient access topublic transport service

4. Public transport qualityand reliability

5. Traffic fatalities per100.000 inhabitants

6. Affordability – travel costs as part of income

7. Operational costs of thepublic transport system

8. Investment in publictransportation systems

9. Air quality (pm10)

10. Greenhouse gasemissions from transport

THANK YOU

sustainable urban transport index bhopal. urban... · 2019-11-12 · comprehensive mobility plan -...

Documents