sustainable performance ranking metric by sonoma raceway

23
Sustainable Performance Ranking Metric Methodology and Results

Upload: sonomaraceway

Post on 22-May-2015

125 views

Category:

Automotive


1 download

DESCRIPTION

The goal of this ini>al project is to create a simple automobile ranking system that demonstrates which vehicles best optimize both sustainability and performance. In the process, we hope to start a dialogue on this topic and inspire partners to join us in this mission.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Sustainable Performance Ranking Metric by Sonoma Raceway

Sustainable  Performance  Ranking  Metric  

Methodology  and  Results  

Page 2: Sustainable Performance Ranking Metric by Sonoma Raceway

Sustainability  vs.  Performance?  

Consumer  vehicles  are  typically  posi>oned  to  be  either  “green”  or  “high  performance”.  

 What  about  the  driver  who  wants  both?  

Page 3: Sustainable Performance Ranking Metric by Sonoma Raceway

Project  Vision  

•  To  create  a  new  standard  in  vehicle  excellence  that  values  both  sustainability  and  performance.  

•  To  empower  consumers  to  choose  vehicles  that  balance  sustainability  and  performance.  

•  To  incen>vize  automo>ve  manufacturers  to  op>mize  sustainable  performance  technologies.  

Page 4: Sustainable Performance Ranking Metric by Sonoma Raceway

A  Ranking  Metric  

The  goal  of  this  ini>al  project  is  to  create  a  simple  automobile  ranking  system  that  demonstrates  which  vehicles  best  op>mize  both  sustainability  and  performance.    In  the  process,  we  hope  to  start  a  dialogue  on  this  topic  and  inspire  partners  to  join  us  in  this  mission.  

Sustainability                    +                    Performance  

Page 5: Sustainable Performance Ranking Metric by Sonoma Raceway

Academic  Research  Team  

GreenMBA  Student  Team  –  Daniel  Bakke  –  Kevin  Bullock  –  Peter  Carlson  –  Louise  Kelso  –  Stephanie  Servente  –  Annie  Sherman  –  Lisa  Beth  Wellhausen  

This  project  started  as  a  group  assignment  in  the  GreenMBA’s  Sustainable  Metrics  class.      Special  thanks  goes  to  these  students  for  their  hours  of  research  in  crea>ng  our  beta  data.  

Page 6: Sustainable Performance Ranking Metric by Sonoma Raceway

Engineer  Review  

Dr.  Paul  Erickson  –  Associate  Professor  Mechanical  and  Aerospace  Engineering,  UC  Davis  

Page 7: Sustainable Performance Ranking Metric by Sonoma Raceway

Beta  Methodology  For  this  beta  version,  we’ve  inten>onally  used  a  limited  data  set  and  simplified  math  to  study  how  to  create  a  more  

advanced  ranking  system.  

Page 8: Sustainable Performance Ranking Metric by Sonoma Raceway

Ranking  Components  

Sustainable  Performance  Ranking  

Sustainability  

Miles  Per  Gallon  (City/Highway)  

Emissions  (Tailpipe  &  Upstream)  

Performance  

Horsepower  

Torque  

Power/Weight  Ra>o  

Page 9: Sustainable Performance Ranking Metric by Sonoma Raceway

Basic  Math  •  Sustainability  Ranking  

–  1  to  5  points  rela>ve  to  best  and  worse  

–  Equal  parts  Miles  Per  Gallon  and  Emissions  

•  Performance  Ranking  –  1  to  5  points  rela>ve  to  best  and  worse  

–  Equal  parts  Horsepower,  Torque,  and  Power/Weight  

•  Sustainable  Performance  Total  –  Up  to  5  sustainability  points  +  up  to  5  performance  points  =  Up  to  10  Total  Points  

Page 10: Sustainable Performance Ranking Metric by Sonoma Raceway

Data  Set  Parameters  •  Gas,  Diesel  and  Hybrid  Technologies  

–  Electric  Vehicle  Ranking  Included  for  Comparison  •  Consumer  Vehicles  

–  Under  $60,000  •  Popular  Vehicles  

–  Top  100  Sold  in  2011  –  Plus  select  green  vehicles  for  comparison  

•  Entry  Level  Engine/Accessories  –  Reduces  complexity  in  the  beta  data  set  

•  StaGc  Performance  Data  –  Performance  is  primary  sta>c  metrics  –  Later  will  add  dynamic  performance  data  such  as  

handling  and  breaking.  

Page 11: Sustainable Performance Ranking Metric by Sonoma Raceway

Primary  Data  Sources  

Page 12: Sustainable Performance Ranking Metric by Sonoma Raceway

Later  Data  to  be  Integrated  •  Sustainability  

–  Life  Cycle  Analysis  (i.e.  full  costs  of  hybrid  baderies)  

–  Passenger  Mile  (2  seat,  4  seat,  10  seat)  

–  Drag  Coefficient  –  Total  Cost  of  Ownership  (Fuel,  

Insurance,  Maintenance)  •  Performance  

–  Braking  –  Handling  –  Safety  Ra>ngs  –  0-­‐60  >mes  –  Electric  Specific:  Range  /  

Recharge  Time  /  Volts  Used  

Page 13: Sustainable Performance Ranking Metric by Sonoma Raceway

Results  Set  #1  

Sedan/Coupe  Ranking  Leaderboards  

Page 14: Sustainable Performance Ranking Metric by Sonoma Raceway

Sustainable  Performance  Top  10  Sedans/Coupes  –  Under  $60k  

Make   Model   Tech   Sustainability   Performance   TOTAL  

Ford   Mustang   Gas   2.4   5.0   7.4  

Toyota   Camry  LE  Hybrid   Hybrid   4.3   3.1   7.3  

Lincoln     MKZ  Hybrid   Hybrid   3.1   4.1   7.2  

Chevrolet   Camaro   Gas   2.2   4.9   7.2  

BMW   3-­‐Series   Gas   3.0   4.1   7.1  

Mercedes-­‐Benz   E-­‐Class   Gas   2.3   4.8   7.1  

Chevrolet   Impala   Gas   2.4   4.7   7.0  

Kia   Op>ma  LX  Hybrid   Hybrid   4.0   3.1   7.0  

Hyundai   Sonata  Hybrid   Hybrid   4.0   3.1   7.0  

Mercedes   E350  BlueTec   Diesel   2.4   4.6   7.0  

Page 15: Sustainable Performance Ranking Metric by Sonoma Raceway

Sustainable  Performance  Top  10  Sedans/Coupes  –  Under  $30k  

Make   Model   Tech   Sustainability   Performance   TOTAL  

Ford   Mustang   Gas   2.4   5.0   7.4  

Toyota   Camry  LE  Hybrid   Hybrid   4.3   3.1   7.3  

Chevrolet   Camaro   Gas   2.2   4.9   7.2  

Chevrolet   Impala   Gas   2.4   4.7   7.0  

Kia   Op>ma  LX  Hybrid   Hybrid   4.0   3.1   7.0  

Hyundai   Sonata  Hybrid   Hybrid   4.0   3.1   7.0  

Dodge   Challenger   Gas   2.2   4.6   6.8  

Dodge   Charger   Gas   2.2   4.3   6.5  

Volkswagen   Passat  TDI  SE   Diesel   3.7   2.8   6.5  

Ford   Fusion  Hybrid   Hybrid   4.0   2.2   6.3  

Page 16: Sustainable Performance Ranking Metric by Sonoma Raceway

Results  Set  #2  

SUV/Truck  Ranking  Leaderboards  

Page 17: Sustainable Performance Ranking Metric by Sonoma Raceway

Sustainable  Performance  Top  10  SUVs/Trucks  –  Under  $60k  

Make   Model   Tech   Sustainability   Performance   TOTAL  

Toyota   Highlander  Hybrid   Hybrid   3.0   4.7   7.7  

Lexus     RX  450h  Hybrid   Hybrid   3.1   3.9   7.0  

GMC   Sierra  Hybrid  (Truck)   Hybrid   2.1   4.8   6.9  

GMC     Yukon  Hybrid   Hybrid   2.1   4.8   6.9  

Mercedes   ML350  BlueTec   Diesel   1.9   4.8   6.8  

BMW   X5  xDrive35d   Diesel   1.9   4.8   6.6  

Ford   Edge   Gas   2.3   4.1   6.4  

Volkswagon   Touareg  Sports   Diesel   2.0   4.3   6.3  

BMW   X5   Gas   2.0   4.2   6.2  

Cadillac   SRX   Gas   1.8   4.4   6.2  

Page 18: Sustainable Performance Ranking Metric by Sonoma Raceway

Sustainable  Performance  Top  10  SUVs/Trucks  –  Under  $30k  

Make   Model   Tech   Sustainability   Performance   TOTAL  

Ford   Edge   Gas   2.3   4.1   6.4  

Ford   F-­‐Series  F150  (Truck)   Gas   1.8   4.2   6.0  

Jeep   Wrangler   Gas   1.6   4.4   5.9  

Ford   Explorer   Gas   2.0   4.0   5.9  

Nissan   Murano   Gas   1.9   3.9   5.8  

Chevrolet   Traverse   Gas   1.8   3.9   5.7  

Dodge   Ram  Pickup  1500  (Truck)   Gas   1.2   4.5   5.7  

Dodge   Durango   Gas   1.7   3.9   5.7  

Honda   CR-­‐V  2WD   Gas   2.8   2.6   5.5  

Kia   Sportage   Gas   2.6   2.7   5.3  

Page 19: Sustainable Performance Ranking Metric by Sonoma Raceway

Results  Set  #3  

Hatchback/Wagon  Ranking  Leaderboards  

Page 20: Sustainable Performance Ranking Metric by Sonoma Raceway

Sustainable  Performance  Top  10  Hatchbacks/Wagons  –  Under  $60k  

Make   Model   Tech   Sustainability   Performance   TOTAL  

Chevrolet   Volt  Plugin  Hybrid   Hybrid  Mode   4.0   3.0   7.0  

Toyota   Prius  Hybrid   Hybrid     5.0   1.6   6.6  

Volkswagen   Golf  TDI   Diesel   3.6   3.0   6.6  

Volkswagen   Jeda  Sportswagon  TDI   Diesel   3.6   2.8   6.4  

Audi     A3  TDI   Diesel   3.6   2.8   6.4  

Lexus   CT  200h  Hybrid   Hybrid   4.3   1.9   6.2  

Nissan   Juke   Gas   3.1   3.0   6.2  

Audi     A3  2.0   Gas   2.9   3.3   6.1  

Honda   Insight  EX  Hybrid   Hybrid   4.4   1.5   5.9  

Honda     CR-­‐Z  Hybrid   Hybrid   3.9   1.9   5.8  

Page 21: Sustainable Performance Ranking Metric by Sonoma Raceway

Sustainable  Performance  Top  10  Hatchbacks/Wagons  –  Under  $30k  

Make   Model   Tech   Sustainability   Performance   FINAL  

Toyota   Prius  Hybrid   Hybrid     5.0   1.6   6.6  

Volkswagen   Golf  TDI   Diesel   3.6   3.0   6.6  

Volkswagen   Jeda  Sportswagon  TDI   Diesel   3.6   2.8   6.4  

Lexus   CT  200h  Hybrid   Hybrid   4.3   1.9   6.2  

Nissan   Juke   Gas   3.1   3.0   6.2  

Audi     A3  2.0   Gas   2.9   3.3   6.1  

Honda   Insight  EX  Hybrid   Hybrid   4.4   1.5   5.9  

Honda     CR-­‐Z  Hybrid   Hybrid   3.9   1.9   5.8  

Volkswagen   Golf   Gas   2.9   2.8   5.7  

Kia   Soul   Gas   3.3   2.1   5.4  

Page 22: Sustainable Performance Ranking Metric by Sonoma Raceway

Sustainable  Performance  Top  10  Hatchbacks/Wagons  –  w/  Electric  Vehicles  

Make   Model   Tech   Sustainability   Performance   FINAL  

Tesla   Model-­‐S   Electric   3.9   5.0   8.9  

Chevrolet   Volt  Plugin  Hybrid   Electric  Mode   4.8   3.0   7.8  

Nissan   Leaf   Electric   5.0   2.2   7.2  

Chevrolet   Volt  Plugin  Hybrid   Hybrid  Mode   3.0   3.0   6.0  

Volkswagen   Golf  TDI   Diesel   2.7   3.0   5.7  

Audi     A3  2.0   Diesel   2.4   3.3   5.6  

Volkswagen   Jeda  Sportswagon  TDI   Diesel   2.7   2.8   5.5  

Audi     A3  TDI   Diesel   2.7   2.8   5.5  

Nissan   Juke   Gas   2.5   3.0   5.5  

Toyota   Prius  Hybrid   Hybrid     3.6   1.6   5.2  

This  comparison  is  added  to  show  that  Electric  Vehicles  rank  so  high,  they  change  the  bar  for  sustainability  and  performance.  

Page 23: Sustainable Performance Ranking Metric by Sonoma Raceway

Interested  in  going  further?  

•  We’re  Seeking  Feedback  –  How  can  we  make  this  beder?  

•  We’re  Seeking  Partners  –  Trusted  Data  Sources  –  Engineers  and  Sta>s>cians  –  Press  and  Media  

•  We’re  Seeking  Sponsors  –  Associate  your  brand  with  Sustainable  Performance  innova>on.  

Contact  Us  •  Madhew  J.  Ellis  

Director  of  Business  Development  707-­‐933-­‐3903  [email protected]  

•  Joey  Shepp  Metric  Project  Consultant  415-­‐455-­‐5351  [email protected]