survey of australian institutional attitudes to private equity investment with european (ex uk)...
Post on 19-Dec-2015
217 views
TRANSCRIPT
Survey of Australian Institutional Attitudes to Private Equity Investment with European (ex UK) Comparisons
The Objective
To gain an understanding of the main drivers for institutions to invest/ disinvest in private equity
Support and Authorship
Sponsored by Adveq, a Zurich based private equity fund of funds manager
Australian survey by John Evans, UNSW European survey by Johan
Ginyard,Stockholm School of Economics
The Data
Australia: large superannuation funds, with 40 respondents, $A120 billion of assets
Europe: pension funds, insurers, 106 respondents, $EUR 300 billion of assets (est)
Current Allocations: Australia
6%
10%
13%
45%
26%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%
up to 0.5%
up to 1.0%
up to 2.0%
up to 5.0%
over 5.0%
Current Allocations: Europe
16%
0%
14%
5%
9%
23%
9%
5%
19%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%
up to 0.5%
up to 1.0%
up to 1.5%
up to 2.0%
up to 2.5%
up to 5.0%
up to 7.5%
up to 10.0%
over 10.0%
16%
0%
14%
5%
9%
23%
9%
5%
19%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%
up to 0.5%
up to 1.0%
up to 1.5%
up to 2.0%
up to 2.5%
up to 5.0%
up to 7.5%
up to 10.0%
over 10.0%
Current Investment Medium: Australia
Fund of funds 48%
Direct20%
Single pool32%
Fund of funds 48%
Direct20%
Single pool32%
Current Investment Medium: Europe
Fund of fundsinvestment
14%
Direct fundinvestment
58%
Direct company
investment 28%
Fund of fundsinvestment
14%
Direct fundinvestment
58%
Direct company
investment 28%
Current Country Allocation: Australia
Austra lia74%
N on specific3%
U .S .16%
Asia0%
Europe7%
Austra lia74%
N on specific3%
U .S .16%
Asia0%
Europe7%
Current Country Allocation: Europe
Europe75%
R.o.W .4%
U.S.21%
Europe75%
R.o.W .4%
U.S.21%
Future Allocation
Australia: stable at around 4.5% of FUM Europe: stable at around 3.4% of FUM
Future Investment Medium: Australia
Fund of funds 50%
Direct18%
Single pool32%
Fund of funds 50%
Direct18%
Single pool32%
Future Investment Medium: Europe
Fund of fundsinvestment
28%Direct fundinvestment
54%
Direct company
investment 18%
Fund of fundsinvestment
28%Direct fundinvestment
54%
Direct company
investment 18%
Future Country Allocation: Australia
Australia65%
Non specific13%
U.S.12%
Asia2%
Europe8%
Australia65%
Non specific13%
U.S.12%
Asia2%
Europe8%
Future Country Allocation: Europe
74%
65%
21%26%
1%5% 4%
9%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Europe Europefuture
U.S. U.S.future
Asia Asiafuture
Rest ofWorld
Rest ofWorldfuture
Future Allocation by Type of Investment: Australia
1 2 3 4 5
Asia VC
Asia BO
Europe VC
Secondary markets
US VC
Emerging markets
Europe BO
US BO
Australian VC
Australian BO
most attractive least attractive
1 2 3 4 5
Asia VC
Asia BO
Europe VC
Secondary markets
US VC
Emerging markets
Europe BO
US BO
Australian VC
Australian BO
most attractive least attractive
Future Allocation by Type of Investment: Europe
2.6
2.5
2.8
3.0
2.5
2.5
2.8
3.1
2.9
3.0
1 2 3 4
U.S. Venture Capitalinvestments
U.S.development/growth/buyout
investments
Domestic venture capitalinvestments
Domesticdevelopment/growth/buyout
investments
Asian venture capitalinvestments
Asiandevelopment/growth/buyout
investments
European venture capitalinvestments
Europeandevelopment/growth/buyout
investments
Investments in emergingmarkets
Acquisition of secondarypositions
Unattractive Attractive
2.6
2.5
2.8
3.0
2.5
2.5
2.8
3.1
2.9
3.0
1 2 3 4
U.S. Venture Capitalinvestments
U.S.development/growth/buyout
investments
Domestic venture capitalinvestments
Domesticdevelopment/growth/buyout
investments
Asian venture capitalinvestments
Asiandevelopment/growth/buyout
investments
European venture capitalinvestments
Europeandevelopment/growth/buyout
investments
Investments in emergingmarkets
Acquisition of secondarypositions
Unattractive Attractive
Investment Return Objectives
Australia: absolute return of 16.5%pa, relative return of 4.5%pa
Europe: absolute return of 12%pa, relative return of 4%pa
Investment Drivers: Australia
Non financial objectives
Corporate objective
Annual positive returns
Risk diversification
Relative return increment
1 2 3 4 5
most important least important
Non financial objectives
Corporate objective
Annual positive returns
Risk diversification
Relative return increment
1 2 3 4 5
most important least important
Investment Drivers: Europe
3.5
4.2
3.8
2.5
1.6
1 2 3 4 5
Reaching an annual positive return overthe entire period of the commitment
Increase of the relative return
Risk diversification and reduction
Corporate objectives
Non-financial objectives
Unimportant Very important
3.5
4.2
3.8
2.5
1.6
1 2 3 4 5
Reaching an annual positive return overthe entire period of the commitment
Increase of the relative return
Risk diversification and reduction
Corporate objectives
Non-financial objectives
Unimportant Very important
Managing the Investment
Australia: predominately trustee decision and management (with asset consultant)
Europe: In over two thirds of the Nordic institutions surveyed, the CIO (Chief Investment Officer) or a dedicated Private Equity Officer is responsible for the investment decision.
Single Pool & FoF Investment Criteria
most important least important
Image
Sparring partner
Customisation
Co investors
Reporting
Governance
Terms
Transparency
Other
Team
Track record
Value added
Financials
Industry knowledge
Manager track record
Operational
1 2 3 4 5
most important least important
Image
Sparring partner
Customisation
Co investors
Reporting
Governance
Terms
Transparency
Other
Team
Track record
Value added
Financials
Industry knowledge
Manager track record
Operational
1 2 3 4 5
PE Barriers: Australia
Internal issues
Know how
Default
Reporting
Time involvement
Tranparency
Long term commitment
Illiquidity
Fees
1 2 3 4 5
low risk/hurdlehigh risk/hurdle
Internal issues
Know how
Default
Reporting
Time involvement
Tranparency
Long term commitment
Illiquidity
Fees
1 2 3 4 5
low risk/hurdlehigh risk/hurdle
PE Barriers: Europe
3.5
3.6
3.2
3.4
3.4
3.6
3
3.1
1 2 3 4 5
Illiquitdity
Lack of transparency
Risk of default
Long-term commitment
Lack of own knowhow
Management time and resource consumption
Effort to convince internal committees(e.g. board of directors)
Reporting and Corporate Governance
Unimportant Important
3.5
3.6
3.2
3.4
3.4
3.6
3
3.1
1 2 3 4 5
Illiquitdity
Lack of transparency
Risk of default
Long-term commitment
Lack of own knowhow
Management time and resource consumption
Effort to convince internal committees(e.g. board of directors)
Reporting and Corporate Governance
Unimportant Important
Conclusions: why invest?
Return enhancement for the investor remains the dominant reason for investing
Diversification is also another important driver
Conclusions: Barriers to investing
Predominately illiquidity issues Europeans also see management time
involvement as a serious issue Australians don’t like the fees
Conclusions: How to invest
Fund of Funds remains the dominant Australian investment medium, but Europeans prefer single pooled funds
A manager’s track record, ie performance, remains the main selection criteria
Conclusions: where to invest
Investors are holding private equity investments at around the 3%-5% levels
Own region remains the dominant target for investment, but with increasing interest in Asia
“Buyout” situations remain the most interesting type of investment
Issues
What are the implications for economic development of the investor attitudes?
What should governments do to change the attitude (assuming they want to)?
What results will investors actually get?