INSIGHT USAGE STATISTICS

Mockup Presentation

for indepth usage analysis of

Repositories, Publications and Authors

maurice.vanderfeesten 1

“Since it is their [Funding Agencies] mission to promote research, many funding agencies support open access. [...] Thus the question arises whether the money invested in open access is on a par with its research impact.”

Johannes Fournier (German Research Foundation)

Berlin6, 13 May 2008, Session 7 - Pondering on Research Impact and Cost Effectiveness

http://oa.mpg.de/berlin6/index8a92.html?page_id=75

maurice.vanderfeesten 2

“ Scientific information has the power to transform our lives for the better – it is too valuable to be locked away. In addition, every EU citizen has the right to access and benefit from knowledge produced using public funds.”

Neelie Kroes, Vice-President of the European Commission for the Digital Agenda

Ghent, 2 December 2010

maurice.vanderfeesten 3

The question of how to measure the effectiveness of such a publishing model [Open Access] was simple, according to Liebrand – by usage levels.

Wim Liebrand, chief executive of SURFfoundation

Research Information, January 2011, Issue 51, page 17

maurice.vanderfeesten 4

Vorming nieuw SURF programma, Platform ICT&Onderzoek Consultatie bijeenkomst, 21 April 2011

maurice.vanderfeesten 5

Impact =

maurice.vanderfeesten 6

citation (h-index & h’-index , eigenfactor, g-index, h-b-index, etc.)

+ usage (downloads & views)

+ peer-review (expert opinion)

+ alt-metrics (storage, links, bookmarks,

conversations/reviews/opinions)

Journal Article

Individual Topic

altmetrics.org & en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Bibliometrics

INSIGHT SURVEY RESULTS 2011-04-26

maurice.vanderfeesten 7

Repository managers able to make efforts for delivering statistics before the OpenAccess week 2011

1. Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam 2. NWO / CWI 3. Rijksuniversiteit Groningen 4. Technische Universiteit Delft 5. Universiteit Leiden 6. Universiteit Maastricht 7. Universiteit Utrecht 8. Universiteit van Amsterdam 9. Universiteit van Tilburg 10. Vrije Universiteit 11. Wageningen Universiteit & Researchcentrum

maurice.vanderfeesten 8

Repository managers positive towards sharing common statistics

1. Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam 2. NWO / CWI 3. Rijksuniversiteit Groningen 4. Technische Universiteit Delft 5. Universiteit Leiden 6. Universiteit Maastricht 7. Universiteit Twente 8. Universiteit Utrecht 9. Universiteit van Amsterdam 10. Universiteit van Tilburg 11. Vrije Universiteit 12. Wageningen Universiteit & Researchcentrum

maurice.vanderfeesten 9

What repository managers want

• Visualisation of: – Totals

– Usage over time

– Geographics

– Popularity

• Numbers of: – Objects

– Metadata Views

– Fulltext Downloads

• Filtered by: – Time period

– Institution

– Publication Type

– Single Publication *

– Single Author *

*) added value for researchers

maurice.vanderfeesten 10

Visualising statistics

• For Repository Managers

– Insight Repositories Dashboard

• For Researchers

– Insight Publication Dashboard

– Insight Author Dashboard

maurice.vanderfeesten 11

INSIGHT REPOSITORIES for repository managers

maurice.vanderfeesten 12

maurice.vanderfeesten 13

Views: 77.594 Downloads: 908.434 Objects: 606.985

Views Downloads

Objects

Views/Objects

Downloads/Objects

[Views] Downloads

362

256

131

3362

2256

1131

insight-statistics

maurice.vanderfeesten 14

maurice.vanderfeesten 15

maurice.vanderfeesten 16

maurice.vanderfeesten 17

maurice.vanderfeesten 18

[Views] Downloads

maurice.vanderfeesten 19

maurice.vanderfeesten 20

maurice.vanderfeesten 21

maurice.vanderfeesten 22

INSIGHT PUBLICATIONS for the Researchers

maurice.vanderfeesten 23

Statistieken

maurice.vanderfeesten 24

Views: 14

Downloads: 219

Views Downloads

Objects

Views/Objects

Downloads/Objects

Statistieken

Views

Overzicht

maurice.vanderfeesten 25

INSIGHT AUTHORS for the Researchers

maurice.vanderfeesten 26

Statistieken

maurice.vanderfeesten 27

Views: 679

Downloads: 5127

Views Downloads

Objects

Views/Objects

Downloads/Objects

Views Downloads

362

256

131

3362

2256

1131

Statistieken

Views

Overzicht

urn:nbn:nl:ui:11-dbi/49edad50a2f3e urn:nbn:nl:ui:11-dbi/443cd774057d6 urn:nbn:nl:ui:11-dbi/44902c349fcc0 urn:nbn:nl:ui:11-dbi/44d872431bbdc

maurice.vanderfeesten 28

PAST: SURE1

maurice.vanderfeesten 29

• Infrastructuur, architectuur, protocollen en beheer – SURE uitwissel standaard (OAI-PMH+OpenURL ContextObjects)

– SURE robot filter list (based on international acceptance)

– SURE repository module (download, deploy, configure)

– SURE log aggregator

– SURE API Services

• Dagelijkse harvest

• Downloads en views per identifier

http://wiki.surffoundation.nl/display/statistics/Project+results maurice.vanderfeesten 30

UvA VU

maurice.vanderfeesten 31

PRESENT: OPENAIRE Statistics in international context, using the same standards

maurice.vanderfeesten 32

maurice.vanderfeesten 33

maurice.vanderfeesten 34

PRESENT: SURE2

maurice.vanderfeesten 35

Business case

• Op een aantrekkelijke manier de impact en gebruik van Open Access Publicaties presenteren van Repositories in Nederland.

• Biedt een additionele mogelijkheid om impact te meten (in de maatschappij).

• Voor wie: Repository Managers & Onderzoekers

maurice.vanderfeesten 36

Resultaten

• Downloads en views per Auteur, Publication

• Statistics Dashboard

• Verder uitrol en inbedding in landelijke repository community en Narcis

• Resultaat op OpenAccess Week 2011 (okt)

maurice.vanderfeesten 37

NWO/CWI TUD UL UM UU UvA UvT VU WUR

DANS

Embedable </> HTML code snippets

maurice.vanderfeesten 38

WP1: Project Management

WP2: Repository

Dashboard (buiten narcis)

development + roadmapping

WP6: Kennis disseminatie

WP5: Repositories

implementation and

Support

WP4: Log Harvesting

Project indeling

WP3: End-user

Dashboard (in narcis)

maurice.vanderfeesten 39

Project uitvoering

• WP1: Project management – UvT

• WP2: Repository Dashboard development (buiten narcis) – DANS

• WP3: End-user Dashboard development (in narcis) – DANS

• WP4: Log Harvesting – DANS

• WP5: Repository implementatie en Support – Implementation: EUR, NWO/CWI, TUD, UM, UU, UvT, WUR (≈16uur per IR) – Support: VU, UvA, UL (≈2uur per te implementeren IR)

• WP6: Kennis disseminatie – UL – Artikel & Conferentie? – Exposure in SURFshare community: nieuwsbrief, scienceguide, etc.

maurice.vanderfeesten 40

Budget verdeling

WP1: Project Management

WP2: Repository

Dashboard (buiten narcis)

development + roadmapping

WP6: Kennis disseminatie

WP5: Repositories

implementation and

support

WP4: Log Harvesting

WP3: End-user

Dashboard (in narcis)

€5.000

€7.500

Eigen-bijdrage

€12.500

Penvoerder 100% subsidie

DANS 50% subsidie + 50% matching

Instellingen Eigen bijdrage (=100% matching)

Instelling 100% subsidie

maurice.vanderfeesten 41

Vervolgstappen

• Project Plan – richting BIK

• Letter of intent (eindverantwoordelijke repositories)

• Subsidievoorwaarde penvoerder

• Planning communiceren

– Kickoff: 1 juni

– Resultaat: okt OpenAccess Week 2011

maurice.vanderfeesten 42

VRAGEN? vanderfeesten@surf.nl

maurice.vanderfeesten 43