supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if …

36
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ] WEEKLY LIST No. 30 OF 2019 FROM : 19-11-2019 To 21-11-2019 COURT NO. : 9 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA REGULAR HEARING SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/Respondent Advocate 1 T.C.(C) No. 113/2005 XVI-A NIFTY CHEMICALS PVT. LTD. JYOTI MENDIRATTA, MANISH KUMAR SARAN, CHANDER SHEKHAR ASHRI Versus UNION OF INDIA . AND ORS. Connected T.C.(C) No. 118/2005 XVI-A M/S. GUPTA DOMESTIC FUELS PVT. LTD. CHANDER SHEKHAR ASHRI Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. V. K. VERMA[R-1], UDDYAM MUKHERJEE[R-2], [R-3] Connected T.C.(C) No. 120/2005 XVI-A TEXELA INDUSTRIES FACTORY CHANDER SHEKHAR ASHRI[P-1] Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. V. K. VERMA[R-1], UDDYAM MUKHERJEE[R-2], [R-3] Connected T.C.(C) No. 122/2005 XVI-A M/S. SARASWATI ENTERPRISES . AND ORS. Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. V. K. VERMA[R-1], UDDYAM MUKHERJEE[R-2], [R-3] 2 C.A. No. 3934/2006 IV-A P. ANJANAPPA (D) BY LRS. AND ORS. NAVEEN R. NATH[P-1] Versus A.P. NANJUNDAPPA AND ORS. DEVASA & CO.[R-1], [R-2], S. N. BHAT[R-3], [R-4], [R-5], [R-6.4], [R-6.3], [R-6.2], [R-6.1], RAJEEV SINGH[R-9] 3 C.A. No. 3453/2007 IX ASHWINI SAHAKARI RUGNALAYA & RES. CENTRE P. S. SUDHEER[P-1] Versus CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX . AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1] to be listed as per court's order dated 17.08.2018. 4 C.A. No. 2169/2007 IV-A MYSORE SALES INTERNATIONAL LTD. ETC. NANDA KISHORE[P-1] Versus THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS) I AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-2], [R-3] adjourned for two weeks as per order dated 10.07.2019 Connected C.A. No. 2168/2007 IV-A THE EXCISE COMMISSIONER, KARNATAKA AND ANR. V. N. RAGHUPATHY[P-1] Versus MYSORE SALES INTERNATIONAL LTD AND ORS. ETC. NANDA KISHORE[R-1], ANIL KATIYAR[R-2], [R-3], [R-4], RAJESH MAHALE[R-5]

Upload: others

Post on 21-Oct-2021

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATESON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS

LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]WEEKLY LIST No. 30 OF 2019 FROM : 19-11-2019 To 21-11-2019

COURT NO. : 9HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHAREGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/Respondent Advocate

1 T.C.(C) No. 113/2005XVI-A

NIFTY CHEMICALS PVT. LTD. JYOTI MENDIRATTA, MANISH KUMAR SARAN,CHANDER SHEKHAR ASHRI

VersusUNION OF INDIA . AND ORS.

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 118/2005XVI-A

M/S. GUPTA DOMESTIC FUELS PVT.LTD. CHANDER SHEKHAR ASHRI

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. V. K. VERMA[R-1], UDDYAM MUKHERJEE[R-2],[R-3]

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 120/2005XVI-A

TEXELA INDUSTRIES FACTORY CHANDER SHEKHAR ASHRI[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. V. K. VERMA[R-1], UDDYAM MUKHERJEE[R-2],[R-3]

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 122/2005XVI-A

M/S. SARASWATI ENTERPRISES . ANDORS.Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. V. K. VERMA[R-1], UDDYAM MUKHERJEE[R-2],[R-3]

2 C.A. No. 3934/2006IV-A

P. ANJANAPPA (D) BY LRS. AND ORS. NAVEEN R. NATH[P-1]Versus

A.P. NANJUNDAPPA AND ORS.DEVASA & CO.[R-1], [R-2], S. N. BHAT[R-3],[R-4], [R-5], [R-6.4], [R-6.3], [R-6.2], [R-6.1],RAJEEV SINGH[R-9]

3 C.A. No. 3453/2007IX

ASHWINI SAHAKARI RUGNALAYA &RES. CENTRE P. S. SUDHEER[P-1]

VersusCHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX . AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]

to be listed as per court's order dated 17.08.2018.

4 C.A. No. 2169/2007IV-A

MYSORE SALES INTERNATIONAL LTD.ETC. NANDA KISHORE[P-1]

VersusTHE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX (TDS) I AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

adjourned for two weeks as per order dated 10.07.2019

ConnectedC.A. No. 2168/2007IV-A

THE EXCISE COMMISSIONER,KARNATAKA AND ANR. V. N. RAGHUPATHY[P-1]

VersusMYSORE SALES INTERNATIONAL LTDAND ORS. ETC.

NANDA KISHORE[R-1], ANIL KATIYAR[R-2],[R-3], [R-4], RAJESH MAHALE[R-5]

Page 2: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …

COURT NO. : 95 Crl.A. No. 462/2012

IIHARAK CHAND AND ORS. VIKAS MEHTA[P-1]VersusHIMMAT MAL GANDHI . AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]

6 C.A. No. 1844/2010IV-A

H.S.GOUTHAM BHARTI TYAGI[P-1]VersusRAMA MURTHY AND ANR. ETC. P. R. RAMASESH[R-1], [R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 1845/2010IV-A

H.M.RAVINDRA KUMAR ROHIT AMIT STHALEKAR[P-1]

Versus

RAMA MURTHY AND ORS. ETC. P. R. RAMASESH[R-1], [R-2], A. SUBBARAO[R-3]

7 C.A. No. 7684/2009IX

DAGADU(DEAD) THROUGH LRS. ANDORS. VENKATESWARA RAO ANUMOLU

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ANDORS.

CHANDAN RAMAMURTHI, NISHANTRAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

8 C.A. No. 414/2007XVII

GRID CORPORATION OF ORISSA LTD. RAJ KUMAR MEHTA[P-1]VersusWESTERN ELECTRICITY SUPPLYCOMPANY OF ORISSA LTD. AND ORS.ETC.

RAJESH KUMAR[R-1], MILIND KUMAR[R-1], K.V. MOHAN[R-1], KIRTI RENU MISHRA[R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 417/2007XVII

ORISSA POWER TRANSMISSION CORP.LTD. RAJ KUMAR MEHTA[P-1]

Versus

WESTERN ELECTRICITY COMPANY OFORISSA LTD. AND ORS.

RAJESH KUMAR[R-1], SOM RAJCHOUDHURY[R-1][PR], RUTWIKPANDA[R-2][PR], K. V. MOHAN[R-2], P. K.MANOHAR[R-12]

ConnectedC.A. No. 759/2007XVII

ORISSA ELECTRICITY REGULATORYCOMMISSION RUTWIK PANDA[P-1]

VersusNORTH EASTERN ELECTRICITY SUPPLYCO. OF ORISSA LTD.

RAJESH KUMAR[R-1], ABHISTH KUMAR[R-11],SURESH CHANDRA TRIPATHY[R-12]

ConnectedC.A. No. 572/2011XVII

GRIDCO LIMITED RAJ KUMAR MEHTA[P-1]

VersusWESTERN ELECT. SUP. CO. OF ORISSALD.

SOM RAJ CHOUDHURY, [R-1], RUTWIKPANDA[R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 463/2011XVII

GRIDCO LIMITED RAJ KUMAR MEHTA[P-1]

VersusNORTH-EASTERN ELEC.SUP.CO.OFORISSA LTD. (NESCO) AND ORS.

SOM RAJ CHOUDHURY[R-1], RUTWIKPANDA[R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No.2942-2943/2011XVII

WESTERN ELECT.SUP.CO.OF ORISSALTD.ETC. SOM RAJ CHOUDHURY

VersusORISSA ELECT. REGULATORY COMMN.. RAJ KUMAR MEHTA, RUTWIK PANDA

ConnectedC.A. No.2939-2941/2011XVII

WESTERN ELECT.SUPPLY CO.OFORISSA LTD. SOM RAJ CHOUDHURY[P-1]

Versus

ORISSA ELECT. REGULATORY COMMN.. RUTWIK PANDA[R-1], RAJ KUMARMEHTA[R-2], P. K. MANOHAR[R-8][PR]

ConnectedC.A. No.3595-3597/2011XVII

ORISSA ELECT. REGUL. COMMN. RUTWIK PANDA[P-1]

Versus

Page 3: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …

COURT NO. : 9WESTERN ELECT.SUP.CO.OF ORISSALTD. AND ORS. SOM RAJ CHOUDHURY[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2674/2013XVII

ODISHA ELECTRICITY REGULATORYCOMMISSION RUTWIK PANDA

VersusGRID CORPN.OF ORISSA LTD. . ANDORS. RAJ KUMAR MEHTA

ConnectedC.A. No.10251-10263/2013XVII

ORISSA ELECTRICITY REGULATORYCOMMISSION RUTWIK PANDA

Versus

SOUTHERN ELECTRICITY SUPPLYCOMPANY OF ORISSA LTD. (SOUTHCO)AND ORS.

SOM RAJ CHOUDHURY, SHIV KUMARSURI[CAVEAT], RAJ KUMAR MEHTA,KRISHNAYAN SEN, ANINDITA PUJARI,SHIBASHISH MISRA[R-55]

ConnectedC.A. No.2625-2638/2014XVII

SOUTHERN ELECT. SUPPLY COMPANYOF ORISSA AND ORS. SHIV KUMAR SURI[P-1]

VersusORSSA ELECTRICITY REGULATORYCOMMISSION AND ORS.

RUTWIK PANDA[R-1], RAJ KUMARMEHTA[R-1], SHIBASHISH MISRA[R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No.3858-3860/2014XVII

ODISHA ELECTRICITY REGULATORYCOMMISSION RUTWIK PANDA

VersusWESTERN ELECTRICITY SUPPLYCOMPANY OF ORISSA LTD. AND ORS.

SOM RAJ CHOUDHURY, SHIV KUMAR SURI,ANINDITA PUJARI

ConnectedC.A. No.1380-1382/2015XVII

ODISHA ELECTRICITY REGULATORYCOMMISSION RUTWIK PANDA[P-1]

Versus

NORTH EASTERN ELECTRICITY SUPPLYCOMPANY OF ODISHA LTD. (NESCO)AND ORS.

RAJ KUMAR MEHTA[INT], RAJESHKUMAR[R-1], SHIBASHISH MISRA[R-2],ANINDITA PUJARI[R-15]ABHISHEK SINGH[IMPL]

ConnectedC.A. No.8037-8039/2015XVII

GRIDCO LIMITED RAJ KUMAR MEHTA

Versus

NORTH EASTERN ELECTRICITY SUPPLYCOMPANY OF ODISHA LTD. AND ORS.

SOM RAJ CHOUDHURY[R-7], SHARMILAUPADHYAY, RUTWIK PANDA, RAJESH KUMAR,ANINDITA PUJARI

9 C.A. No. 7017/2011XIV-A

SANGITA AND ORS. RAJESH SRIVASTAVAVersus

KULDEEP SINGH AND ORS. YASH PAL DHINGRA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], NARESHBAKSHI[R-5], [R-6], [R-7], [R-13], [R-14]

10 C.A. No. 4983/2009X

THE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND ANDANR. RACHANA SRIVASTAVA

VersusRAVI KUMAR (D) THR. LRS . AND ORS. A. VENAYAGAM BALAN, AP & J CHAMBERS

ConnectedC.A. No. 4988/2009X

STATE OF UTTARANCHAL (EARLIERSTATE OF U.P.) RACHANA SRIVASTAVA

VersusVIRENDER KR(D) TH. LRS . AND ANR. A. VENAYAGAM BALAN, AP & J CHAMBERS

ConnectedC.A. No. 4984/2009X

STATE OF UTTARANCHAL THR. THECOLLECTOR RACHANA SRIVASTAVA

VersusVIRENDER KR(D) THR. LRS. . AND ANR. A. VENAYAGAM BALAN, AP & J CHAMBERS

Page 4: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …

COURT NO. : 9ConnectedC.A. No. 4985/2009X

THE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND RACHANA SRIVASTAVA

VersusRAVI KUMAR (D) THR. LRS. AND ORS. A. VENAYAGAM BALAN, AP & J CHAMBERS

ConnectedCONMT.PET.(C) No.165-168/2007 In C.A.No. 4983/2009X

RAVI KUMAR A. VENAYAGAM BALAN

Versus

R.K.SUDHANSHU AND ORS. RAKESH K. SHARMA, P. N. GUPTA

ConnectedC.A. No.4989-4992/2009X

STATE OF UTTARKHAND KAMLENDRA MISHRA[P-1][GR]

Versus

RAVI KUMAR (D) TH. LRS. ETC. ANAGHA S. DESAI[R-1], A. VENAYAGAMBALAN[R-1]

11 Crl.A. No. 251/2010II-A

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[P-1]VersusAMAR LAL NIDHI[R-1]

12 C.A. No. 1900/2010XVI

PARGAN SINGH AND ORS. T. MAHIPALVersusBHIKHAR SINGH @ SUDARSHAN SINGHAND ORS. BRIJ BHUSHAN

and IA No.62622/2017-XTRA and IA No.62625/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.70066/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTSand IA No.70067/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

13 C.A. No.1843-1844/2009X

STATE OF U.P.(NOW UTTARAKHAND)THR. COLLECTOR HARIDWAR AND ANR. VINAY ARORA[P-1][GR]

VersusR.B.NARAIN SINGH SUGAR MILLS LTD.THR. CHAIRMAN SARDAR HARDEVSINGH AND ANR.

VINEET BHAGAT[R-1], MRIDULA RAYBHARADWAJ[R-1]

[ RETAIN ITS POSITION ]ConnectedC.A. No.1845-1846/2009X

TOWN AREA COMMITTEE THR.EXECUTIVE OFFICER SRIDHAR POTARAJU

VersusR.B.NARAIN SINGH SUGAR MILLS LTD.THR. CHAIRMAN AND ORS. VINEET BHAGAT

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 35030/2015X

M/S. RAI BAHADUR NARAYAN SINGHSUGAR MILLS LIMITED THROUGH ITSRESOLUTION SHRI KAILASH JOSHI(GENERA

VINEET BHAGAT[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND THROUGHCOLLECTOR GAICHANGPOU GANGMEI[R-4], [R-5]

PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS

14 C.A. No. 7647/2009III-A

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESHTHROUGH SECRETARY AND ORS. KAMLENDRA MISHRA[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4]

VersusCHAMPA DEVI{Fixed Date by Court for 19-11-2019 }

ConnectedC.A. No. 8882/2011III-A

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ANDANR. KAMLENDRA MISHRA[P-1], [P-2]

Versus

ASHOK KUMAR KAMANI . AND ORS.RITESH AGRAWAL[R-9], [R-10], GARIMAPRASHAD[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5], [R-6],[R-11], [R-12], [R-13], [R-14]

{Fixed Date by Court for 19-11-2019 }

Page 5: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …

COURT NO. : 9ConnectedC.A. No. 8881/2011III-A

RAI PUSHPALATA (D) P. K. JAIN[P-1]

VersusVARANASI VIKAS PRADIKARANSECRETARY AND ORS.

ARUN K. SINHA[R-1], KAMLENDRAMISHRA[R-2]

{Fixed Date by Court for 19-11-2019 }ConnectedC.A. No. 8870/2011III-A

SMT. SNEHLATA GOEL T. MAHIPAL[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESHTHROUGH COMPETENT AUTHORITYAND ORS.

KAMLENDRA MISHRA[R-1], ARUN K.SINHA[R-2], E. C. VIDYA SAGAR[R-3]

{Fixed Date by Court for 19-11-2019 } and IA No.24543/2018-PERMISSION TOPLACE ADDITIONAL FACTS AND GROUNDS and IA No.24544/2018-EXEMPTIONFROM FILING O.T.

ConnectedC.A. No. 825/2018III-A

STATE OF U.P. AND ANR. KAMLENDRA MISHRA[P-1]

Versus

MALHU . AND ORS. E. C. AGRAWALA[R-1], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5]UTKARSH SHARMA[IMPL]

{Fixed Date by Court for 19-11-2019 }ConnectedC.A. No. 826/2018III-A

STATE OF U.P . AND ORS. KAMLENDRA MISHRA[P-1]

VersusANIL KUMAR . AND ORS. MANJU JETLEY[R-1]{Fixed Date by Court for 19-11-2019 } FOR

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 17731/2019XI

KANPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS VICE CHAIRMAN ABHISHEK CHAUDHARY

VersusMOOLA DEVI AND ORS. DEEPAK GOEL[CAVEAT]{Fixed Date by Court for 19-11-2019 } FOR ADMISSION and I.R.

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 17733/2019XI

KANPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ABHISHEK CHAUDHARY

VersusBRIJ LAL AND ORS.{Fixed Date by Court for 19-11-2019 } FOR ADMISSION and I.R.

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 12467/2019XI

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ANDORS. KAMLENDRA MISHRA

VersusMOOLA DEVI AND ORS. DEEPAK GOEL[CAVEAT]{Fixed Date by Court for 19-11-2019 }

15 C.A. No. 1312/2009XII

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. AND ORS. GURMEET SINGH MAKKER[P-1], [P-2], [P-3]VersusS.RAJU AND ORS. AND ORS. E. C. VIDYA SAGAR

16 Crl.A. No. 932/2008II-B

D.C.SANKHLA ETC ABHAY KUMAR, [P-1]Versus

STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. MONIKA GUSAIN[R-1], ARVIND KUMARSHARMA[R-2]

List the matters after two weeks. (Ref.: R/P dated 18.7.2019)ConnectedCrl.A. No. 992/2008II-B

SOM DUTT TYAGI AMARJIT SINGH BEDI[P-1]

Versus

STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. MONIKA GUSAIN[R-1], ARVIND KUMARSHARMA[R-2]

17 C.A. No.1890-1891/2010XII

ASSOCN. OF VASANTH APPTS. OWNERS PRANAV SACHDEVA[P-1]

Versus

Page 6: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …

COURT NO. : 9

V. GOPINANTH AND ORS. AND ORS.R. NEDUMARAN[R-1], P. V. DINESH[R-1], M.YOGESH KANNA[R-1], VINODH KANNA B.[R-6],[R-7], K. V. VIJAYAKUMAR[R-8]

ConnectedC.A. No. 7334/2013XII

M/S KEYARAM HOTELS P.LTD. NEHA RATHI[P-1][PR]

VersusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ORS. B. BALAJI[R-1], VINODH KANNA B.[R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No.7847-7848/2013XII

ASSN.OF VASANTH APARTMENTSOWNERS PRANAV SACHDEVA

VersusSTATE OF T.NADU AND ORS B. BALAJI, VINODH KANNA B.[R-3]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 591/2015X

CREDAI TAMIL NADU D. L. CHIDANANDA

VersusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ORS. VINODH KANNA B.[R-3]

18 Crl.A. No. 816/2010II-A

AJIT B KERKAR E. C. AGRAWALA[P-1]VersusTRADE WINGS HOTELS LTD. AND ORS. BHARGAVA V. DESAI[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 817/2010II-A

ABK ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD. E. C. AGRAWALA

VersusTRADE WINGS HOTELS LTD. AND ORS. BHARGAVA V. DESAI[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 32116/2015IX

TULIP HOTELS PVT. LTD. AND ANR. E. C. AGRAWALA

VersusTRADE WINGS LTD. A PUBLIC LIMITEDCOMPANY AND ORS. BHARGAVA V. DESAI

IA No.73920/2017-STAY APPLICATION19 C.A. No. 4557/2012

XVIDIPALI BISWAS . AND ORS. RAUF RAHIMVersus

NIRMALENDU MUKHERJEE . AND ORS. SATISH KUMAR, [R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5], [R-6],[R-7]

20 C.A. No.2155-2156/2010XVI

TEJESWARA RAO AND ORS ABHA JAIN[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.GURMEET SINGH MAKKER[R-1], ANILKATIYAR[R-1], G. INDIRA[R-2], [R-3], [R-4],[R-5], [R-6], RAUF RAHIM[R-1], [R-7], [R-8]

{Fixed Date by Court for 19-11-2019 } [ RETAIN ITS POSITION ]21 C.A. No. 6835/2009

IVGURCHARAN SINGH AND ORS. R. C. KOHLIVersusANGREZ KAUR AND ANR. P. N. PURI

22 C.A. No.7086-7087/2009III-A

SYED MOHAMMAD SAJJAD ALI KHAN (D) IRSHAD AHMAD[P-1]

VersusSYED MOHD. AHMAD ALI KHAN ANDORS.

EJAZ MAQBOOL[R-1], PRADEEP MISRA[R-1],[R-2], [R-4]

and IA No.128491/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS and IANo.128493/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

23 C.A. No. 3477/2010X

DAVESH NAGALYA AND ORS. BRAJ KISHORE MISHRAVersusPRADEEP KUMAR (D) THR.LRS. ANDORS. SHARMILA UPADHYAY[R-2]

24 C.A. No. 5149/2011XVI

UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS ANDORS. MADHU SIKRI

Versus

Page 7: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …

COURT NO. : 9SUPRIYA BASU PARTHA SIL{Fixed Date by Court for 19-11-2019 }

ConnectedC.A. No. 5148/2011XVI

SUPRIYA BASU PARTHA SIL

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. MADHU SIKRI, GURMEET SINGHMAKKER[R-1]

{Fixed Date by Court for 19-11-2019 }

25 C.A. No.9049-9053/2011XIV-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. B. V. BALARAM DAS[P-1]

VersusM/S K.C.SHARMA AND CO.. AND ORS. NIKILESH RAMACHANDRAN[R-1]LIST THE MATTER AFTER SUMMER VACATION (AS PER ROP(mentioning) DATED20.05.2019)

26 C.A. No.3964-3965/2009XII

R.M. SUNDARAM @R.MEENAKSHISUNDARAM V. N. RAGHUPATHY

VersusSRI KAYAROHANASAMY ANDNEELAYABHAKSHI AMMAN TEMPLE T. HARISH KUMAR

27 C.A. No. 9778/2010IV-A

BHARAT PETROLEUM CORP.LTD. . ANDORS. PAREKH & CO.

VersusANIL PADEGAONKAR PRATIBHA JAIN

ConnectedC.A. No. 9779/2010IV-A

ANIL PADEGAONKAR PRATIBHA JAIN

VersusBHARAT PETROLEUM CORP.LTD.. ANDORS. PAREKH & CO.

28 Crl.A. No. 2205/2009II-C

SANJEEV @ SANJEEVKUMAR AND ORS. LAWYER S KNIT & CO, [P-2][PR], [P-3][PR]VersusSTATE OF KARNATAKA V. N. RAGHUPATHY

29 Crl.A. No. 1158/2009II-B

SOWARAN SINGH ABHISHEK ATREY[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB UTTARA BABBAR[R-1]

30 Crl.A. No. 1639/2010II-B

MAJOR SINGH ABHISHEK ATREYVersusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB KULDIP SINGH, RANJEETA ROHATGI[R-1]List the matter after Holi Holidays. (Ref. Record of Proceeding dated 28.2.2019

31 C.A. No. 3185/2011IX

MANOJ B. JOSHI BHASKAR Y. KULKARNIVersusTHE 8TH INCOME TAX OFFICER ANDORS. AND ORS. B. V. BALARAM DAS, ANIL KATIYAR

32 C.A. No. 1125/2009XI-A

MEENA PAUL AND ORS. ROMY CHACKO[P-1]VersusBIYATREES @ CHINNAMMA (DEAD) BYLRS. AND ORS.

P. GEORGE GIRI[R-1.4], [R-1.3], [R-1.2], [R-1.1],[R-2], [R-3]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 23534/2009XI-A

BIYATREES @ CHINNAMMA . (DEAD)THR. LRS. AND ORS. P. GEORGE GIRI[P-1]

VersusC.G.MANNUEL @ KUNJACHAN . (DEAD)THR. LRS. AND ORS.I.A. No. 1 Application for condonation of delay in filing the SLP

33 C.A. No. 2444/2010XVI

KALAWATI DEVI MANJEET CHAWLAVersusPRABHAWATI DEVI DEAD THR. LRS.AND ANR. AND ANR. S. K. VERMA

Page 8: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …

COURT NO. : 934 C.A. No. 134/2009

XIIT.DHANPAL AND ORS. AND ORS. ANUP KUMARVersusDHANAPAL AND ANR. AND ANR. L. K. PANDEY

35 Crl.A. No. 1738/2010II-A

SHIVA MANSOOR ALIVersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[R-1]

36 Crl.A. No. 2032/2009II-C

R.C.SHARMA(DEAD) THROUGH LRS. LILY ISABEL THOMASVersusSTATE (C.B.I.) MUKESH KUMAR MARORIAFOR ON IA 12987/2010 FOR ON IA 29201/2011 FOR ON IA 81598/2011

37 Crl.A. No. 900/2010II-C

SHANMUGAM V. RAMASUBRAMANIANVersusSTATE BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE M. YOGESH KANNA

38 C.A. No. 7230/2012XIV-A

HIMACHAL ROAD TRANSPORTCORPORATION AND ANR. HIMANSHU TYAGI[P-1], VINOD SHARMA[P-2]

VersusHIMACHAL ROAD TRANSPORTCORPORATION RETIRED EMPLOYEESUNION

PRIYA PURI, [R-1]

39 C.A. No. 4394/2010XIV-A

BOLORAM BORDOLOI RAJIV MEHTA[P-1]VersusLAKHIMI GAOLIA BANK . AND ORS. MITTER & MITTER CO.[R-1], [R-1], [R-2], [R-5]

40 C.A. No.5800-5801/2017XII-A

YARLAGADDA PARTHASARADHI K. SARADA DEVI

VersusYARLAGADDA TULASAMMA . AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY, K. SHIVRAJ CHOUDHURI

41 C.A. No. 1083/2012XII

T.NADU ELECT.BOARDAND ORS. ANDORS. M. YOGESH KANNA[P-1][GR]

VersusK.SUBRAMAIAM S. GOWTHAMAN[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 1084/2012XII

TAMILNADU ELEC.BOARD AND ANR. M. YOGESH KANNA[P-1][GR]

VersusM.RANGANATHAN NISHE RAJEN SHONKER[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 1085/2012XII

TAMILNADU ELEC.BOARD AND ANR.AND ANR. M. YOGESH KANNA[P-1][GR]

VersusA.CYRIL NISHE RAJEN SHONKER[R-1]

42 Crl.A. No. 5/2010II

N.RAGHAVENDER SOMIRAN SHARMA[P-1]VersusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP. BYCBI MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA[R-1]

43 Crl.A. No. 581/2010II-C

PARAMASIVAM K. RAM KUMAR[P-1]VersusSTATE BY SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE M. YOGESH KANNA[R-1]

44 C.A. No. 9493/2010III

KAMLABEN(D) TR.LRS.. AND ORS. NACHIKETA JOSHI[P-1.4], [P-1.3], [P-1.2],[P-1.1], [P-1], [P-2.1], [P-2], [P-3]

VersusSTATE OF GUJARAT . AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI[R-1]

45 Crl.A. No. 1271/2010II-C

SHANKRAPPA SHARNAPPA KACHANURAND ORS. SUPREETA SHARANAGOUDA[P-1]

Versus

STATE OF KARNATAKA SHUBHRANSHU PADHI[R-1], JOSEPHARISTOTLE S.[R-1]

Page 9: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …

COURT NO. : 9ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1272/2010II-C

SIDDU @ SIDDANNA AND ORS. R. D. UPADHYAY[P-1]

VersusHOME DEPARTMENT SHUBHRANSHU PADHI[R-1]

46 Crl.A. No.1750-1751/2009II-B

FAROOQ RASULBHAI KURESHI SANJAY JAIN[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ANR. ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-1], B. V. BALARAMDAS[R-2]

47 C.A. No. 5389/2012XII-A

KALLAKURI PATTABHIRAMASWAMY(D)TR.LRS. G. MADHAVI

VersusKALLAKURI KAMARAJU . AND ORS. SUDHA GUPTA, P. VINAY KUMAR

48 Crl.A. No. 1078/2010II-A

SURENDRA BANGALI @ S.S. ROUTELE PRAMOD DAYAL[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF JHARKHAND ANIL K. JHA[R-1]

49 Crl.A. No. 1008/2010II-C

R.DAMODARAN S. GOWTHAMANVersusTHE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OFPOLICE M. YOGESH KANNA

50 C.A. No.8721-8722/2010XI-A

KERALA REVENUE VILLAGE STAFFORGANISATION (KRVSO),REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY

RADHA SHYAM JENA[P-2]

VersusSTATE OF KERALA . AND ORS. C. K. SASI

51 C.A. No. 8163/2009IV

TEK CHAND JAGRATI SINGH[P-1]Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], MAYURIRAGHUVANSHI[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 5862/2012XIV-A

SHRI SANJIB DEB ROY AND ANR. MAYURI RAGHUVANSHI[P-1], [P-2]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], B. K.SATIJA[R-5], [R-8], JAGRATI SINGH[R-4], [R-6],[R-7]

52 Crl.A. No. 361/2010II-A

ARIFVALI MUHAMMED SHAIKH HIMANSHU MUNSHI[P-1][SCLSC]Versus

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR[R-1]

53 C.A. No.4616-4618/2010IV

JAGMOHAN SINGH DHILLON ETC.ETC. D. MAHESH BABU

Versus

SATWANT SINGH AND ORS. VINEET BHAGAT, KAVEETA WADIA, KARANBHARIHOKE[R-5]

54 C.A. No. 3034/2012XII

RAMACHANDRA REDDY AND ORS. G. BALAJI[P-1]VersusRAMULU AMMAL SHASHI BHUSHAN KUMAR[R-1]

55 C.A. No.2037-2038/2010XI-A

ITTY P. K. MANOHAR

VersusIVY ABRAHAM AND ORS. LIZ MATHEW, [R-2]

56 C.A. No.5199-5201/2011XIV-A

UNMUKT BHATNAGAR AND ORS. KUSUM CHAUDHARY[P-1]

VersusMANOJ BHATNAGAR (D) BY LRS.. ANDANR.

SHOBHA RAMAMOORTHY[R-1.2], RAJIVRANJAN DWIVEDI[R-1]

Page 10: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …

COURT NO. : 957 Crl.A. No. 2004/2010

IIHIMMATA RAM MUKUL KUMAR[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

58 C.A. No.9998-10009/2011III

AMRUTBHAI SOMABHAI PATEL RAGHAVENDRA S. SRIVATSA

VersusSPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER .AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 26300/2015III

PATEL DASHRATHLAL RAMANLAL SUMITA RAY

VersusONGC LTD AND ANR.

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 26807/2015III

LASIBEN JIVANJI THROUGH HERPOWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDERDASHRATHBHAI PATEL

SUMITA RAY

VersusONGC LIMITED . AND ANR.

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 26833/2015III

THAKOR PAPATJI GABHAJI THROUGHHIS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDERDASHRATHBHAI PATEL

SUMITA RAY

VersusONGC LIMITED . AND ANR.

59 C.A. No. 3876/2017XV

JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY S. K. BHATTACHARYAVersus

JAMEA HIDAYAT TRUST AND ORS.R. D. UPADHYAY, PRATIBHA JAIN, PRAGATINEEKHRA, K. L. JANJANI, EQUITY LEXASSOCIATES, COAC

ConnectedC.A. No. 3874/2017XV

JAIPUR DEVT.AUTH. S. K. BHATTACHARYA[P-1]

Versus

M/S S.M.S.INVESTMENT CORP.P.LTD.AND ORS.

COAC[R-1], R. D. UPADHYAY[R-1], PRATIBHAJAIN[R-1], K. L. JANJANI[R-1], EQUITY LEXASSOCIATES[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3872/2017XV

JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY S. K. BHATTACHARYA

Versus

M/S RIDHI SIDHI BUILTTECH PVT. LTDAND ORS. AND ORS.

COAC, R. D. UPADHYAY, PRATIBHA JAIN,PRAGATI NEEKHRA, K. L. JANJANI, EQUITYLEX ASSOCIATES

ConnectedC.A. No. 3873/2017XV

JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY S. K. BHATTACHARYA

Versus

M/S S.M.S.INVESTMENT CORP.P.LTD.AND ORS.

COAC, R. D. UPADHYAY, PRATIBHA JAIN,PRAGATI NEEKHRA, K. L. JANJANI, EQUITYLEX ASSOCIATES

ConnectedC.A. No. 3875/2017XV

JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY S. K. BHATTACHARYA

Versus

M/S RIDHI SIDHI BUILTTECH PVT. LTD.AND ORS. AND ORS.

COAC, R. D. UPADHYAY, PRATIBHA JAIN,PRAGATI NEEKHRA, K. L. JANJANI, EQUITYLEX ASSOCIATES

ConnectedC.A. No. 3871/2017XV

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

Versus

M/S S.M.S.INVESTMENT CORP. . ANDORS.

PRATIBHA JAIN[R-1], MILIND KUMAR[R-2],[R-3], S. K. BHATTACHARYA[R-4], EQUITY LEXASSOCIATES[R-10], K. L. JANJANI[R-11], [R-12],[R-13]

Page 11: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …

COURT NO. : 9ConnectedC.A. No. 3882/2017XV

STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR

VersusM/S RIDHI SIDHI BUILTTECH P.LTD..AND ORS.

B. KRISHNA PRASAD, SARVESH SINGHBAGHEL, R. D. UPADHYAY, COAC

ConnectedC.A. No. 3883/2017XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR

Versus

M/S SMS INVESTMENT CORPPORATION(P) LTD. AND ORS.

SUSHIL KUMAR JAIN, R. D. UPADHYAY,PRATIBHA JAIN, K. L. JANJANI, B. KRISHNAPRASAD, COAC

ConnectedC.A. No. 3877/2017XV

STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR

VersusJAMEA HIDYAT TRUST . AND ORS. R. D. UPADHYAY, B. KRISHNA PRASAD, COAC

ConnectedC.A. No. 3881/2017XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR

VersusTHE JAMEA HIDAYAT TRUST AND ORSAND ORS.

B. KRISHNA PRASAD, R. D. UPADHYAY, K. L.JANJANI, COAC

ConnectedC.A. No. 3878/2017XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR

Versus

M/S. RIDHI SIDHI BUILTTECH PVT. LTD.AND ORS. AND ORS.

SARVESH SINGH BAGHEL, R. D. UPADHYAY,PRATIBHA JAIN, K. L. JANJANI, B. KRISHNAPRASAD, COAC

ConnectedC.A. No. 3880/2017XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR

Versus

M/S SMS INVESTMENT CORP.P.LTD.AND ORS.

SUSHIL KUMAR JAIN, R. D. UPADHYAY,PRATIBHA JAIN, K. L. JANJANI, B. KRISHNAPRASAD, COAC

ConnectedC.A. No.15528-15531/2017XV

ABDUL RASHID MIR AND ANR. MUKUL KUMAR

Versus

M/S. RIDHI SIDHI BUILTTECH PVT.LTD.AND ORS AND ORS.

B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-5], [R-6], ROHIT K.SINGH[R-2]

60 Crl.A. No. 108/2012II-A

GUNA MAHTO R. D. UPADHYAYVersusTHE STATE OF JHARKHAND GOPAL PRASAD

61 Crl.A. No. 2251/2010II-C

FEDRICK CUTINHA S. N. BHAT[P-1]VersusSTATE OF KARNATAKA SHUBHRANSHU PADHI[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 2265/2010II-C

KRISHNAPPA @ KITTU NAIKA N. ANNAPOORANI[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF KARNATAKA SHUBHRANSHU PADHI[R-1]

62 C.A. No. 7334/2010XII

ARUCHAMY GOUNDER @ARUMUGHAM(D)TH:LR AND ORS. V. BALACHANDRAN[P-1]

VersusM. BALASUBRAMANIAM VIKAS MEHTA[R-1]and IA No.92110/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS and IANo.92111/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

63 C.A. No. 8070/2010IV-A

GOVT. TOOL ROOM AND TRAININGCENTRE S. N. BHAT[P-1]

VersusH.N. YOGA RAJAN AND ANR. NARESH KUMAR[R-1]

Page 12: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …

COURT NO. : 964 Crl.A. No. 811/2011

II-CNAGOOR PICHAI @ BADUSHA VIPIN KUMAR JAIVersusTHE STATE THROUGH SUB INSPECTOROF POLICE M. YOGESH KANNA

65 C.A. No. 4749/2011XII

P.P.RATHI V. BALACHANDRANVersusARULMIGU MALLIGESWARARTHIRUKOIL AND ORS. AND ORS. R. SATHISH

66 C.A. No.1137-1138/2011IV

ZILE SINGH ETC. AND ANR. RISHI MALHOTRA

Versus

CHATTER SINGH (DEAD) THR. LRS. ANDORS.

(MRS. ) VIPIN GUPTA, VINOD SHARMA[R-1.4],[R-1.3], [R-1.2], [R-1.1], [R-8.2], [R-8.1], [R-8.6],[R-8.5], [R-8.4], [R-8.3]

67 Crl.A. No. 2418/2010II-C

C.VILVANATHAN SANGEETA KUMARVersusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU M. YOGESH KANNA[R-1]

68 C.A. No. 7580/2012XI-A

PRAKASAN M.P.. AND ORS. A. RAGHUNATH[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4], [P-5],SANAND RAMAKRISHNAN[P-6], [P-7], [P-8]

VersusSTATE OF KERALA . AND ANR. G. PRAKASH[R-1]LIST THE MATTER ON 21.2.2019 BEFORE THE APPROPRIATE BENCH AS PERCOURT'S ORDER DT. 15.01.2019.

69 C.A. No. 10766/2011III-A

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESHTHROUGH COLLECTOR AND ANR. KAMLENDRA MISHRA[P-1], [P-2]

Versus

NANWA (DEAD) THR. LRS. AND ANR. S. R. SETIA[R-1], SUDHIRKULSHRESHTHA[R-2]

70 Crl.A. No. 191/2011II-C

K.RAJENDRAN V. RAMASUBRAMANIANVersusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP. BYTHE INSPECTOR OF POLICE M. YOGESH KANNA[R-1]

71 C.A. No.1869-1871/2018XII

BALASUNDARAM AND ORS. AND ORS. VIPIN NAIR[P-1][PR], [P-2][PR], [P-3][PR]

VersusRAMALINGAM AND ORS. AND ORS.ADVOCATE NAME: MR. VIPIN NAIR(FOR PETITIONER)

72 C.A. No. 97-98/2012XIV-A

INDIAN COUNCIL OF AGRICULTURALRESEARCH THROUGH THE DIRECTORGENERAL AND ANR.

PRAVEEN SWARUP[P-1], [P-2]

Versus

RAJINDER SINGH . AND ORS. SUDARSHAN RAJAN[R-1], [R-2], [R-4], [R-5],[R-6], [R-9]

73 C.A. No. 11196/2011IV-A

STATE BANK OF INDIA SANJAY KAPURVersusA.G.D. REDDY S. N. BHATList in the month of March, 2019 before appropriate Bench..

74 Crl.A. No. 233/2013II-B

BISHNUPADA DUTTA AND ANR. RANJAN MUKHERJEEVersusTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL PLR CHAMBERS AND CO.[R-1]

75 C.A. No. 3927/2018XII-A

G. MADHUSUDHANA PRASAD AND ORS.

V. N. RAGHUPATHY[P-1], [P-2][PR], [P-3][PR],[P-4][PR], [P-5][PR], [P-6][PR], [P-7][PR],[P-8][PR], [P-9][PR], [P-10][PR], [P-11][PR],[P-12][PR], [P-13][PR], [P-14][PR], [P-15][PR],[P-16][PR], [P-17][PR], [P-18][PR], [P-19][PR],[P-20][PR], [P-21][PR]

Versus

Page 13: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …

COURT NO. : 9

M. LAKXMIKANT AND ORS.G. N. REDDY[R-1], [R-6][GR], [R-7][GR],VENKAT PALWAI LAW ASSOCIATES[R-6]SADINENI RAVI KUMAR[I-1][IMPL],[I-2][IMPL], [I-3][IMPL]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3928/2018XII-A

P.V.RAMAPATHI RAO AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY

Versus

GOVERNMENT OF A.P. AND ORS. GUNTUR PRABHAKAR, VENKAT PALWAI LAWASSOCIATES[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3929/2018XII-A

M.B. HEMLATHA AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY

Versus

M. LAXMIKANTH AND ORS. GUNTUR PRABHAKAR[R-6][GR], [R-7][GR],VENKAT PALWAI LAW ASSOCIATES[R-6], [R-6]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3930/2018XII-A

N. VIJAY KUMAR C. K. RAI[P-1]

Versus

G. MOHAN REDDY AND ORS.ABHIJIT SENGUPTA[R-1], GUNTURPRABHAKAR[R-6][GR], [R-7][GR], VENKATPALWAI LAW ASSOCIATES[R-7]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3931/2018XII-A

K.ANANTHA REDDY AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY[P-1]

Versus

GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESHAND ORS.

GUNTUR PRABHAKAR[R-1][GR], [R-2][PR],VENKAT PALWAI LAW ASSOCIATES[R-1], [R-1],[R-2], [R-2], ANIS AHMED KHAN[R-3], [R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3932/2018XII-A

M.PENCHALA RAJU AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY[P-1]

Versus

M.LAXMIKANTH AND ORS.G. N. REDDY, SADINENI RAVI KUMAR[R-1], C.S. N. MOHAN RAO[R-1], GUNTURPRABHAKAR[R-6][GR], [R-7][GR], VENKATPALWAI LAW ASSOCIATES[R-6]

FOR ON IA 11/2014 (Application for impleadment FILED BY MR. C.S.N. MOHANRAO)

76 C.A. No. 6640/2013III-A

VIKAS JAINVersusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS. BHAKTI VARDHAN SINGH[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

77 C.A. No. 3795/2012XII

AROCKIAMARY AND ORS. AND ORS. V. BALACHANDRANVersusKULANDAIAMMAL AND ORS. AND ORS. P. V. YOGESWARAN, SUDHIR KUMAR GUPTA

78 C.A. No. 11341/2013XIV-A

SHANKAR KUMAR T. L. GARGVersusRAM NARAIN AND ANR. PAHLAD SINGH SHARMA, VISHWA PAL SINGH

79 C.A. No.5785-5788/2011III-A

SHAUKAT NARESH KUMAR[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4], [P-5],[P-6], [P-7]

VersusSTATE OF U.P. . AND ORS. TANMAYA AGARWAL[R-1], [R-2]

80 C.A. No. 652/2019XII

S.GAJAGANAPATHY RAKESH K. SHARMAVersusS.RATHINASABABATHY (DEAD) THR LRSAND ORS AND ORS. SUMIT KUMAR, S. R. SETIA[R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 653/2019XII

SHANKAR P. N. RAMALINGAM

VersusS.RATHINASABABATHY (DEAD)THROUGH LRS. AND ORS. SUMIT KUMAR, S. R. SETIA

FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 1/2012

Page 14: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …

COURT NO. : 981 Crl.A. No. 1627/2013

II-BMAHENDRABHAI NATHABHAI RAVAL DHARMENDRA KUMAR SINHA[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-1]

82 C.A. No. 6213/2016IV

TRUST MANDIR THAKUR RAMLACCHAMN JI MAHRAJ ARJUN SINGH BHATI

Versus

PURAN (D) THR. LRS. . AND ORS. A. N. ARORA, RAJIV SHANKAR DVIVEDI,KRISHAN KUMAR, SHILPA SINGH[R-5]

83 C.A. No. 7810/2013XIV-A

JAI KISHAN BANSAL(D) TR.LRS. PETITIONER-IN-PERSONVersusMOHD.ISHTYAQUDDIN K. S. RANA

ConnectedC.A. No. 7813/2013XIV-A

JAI KISHAN BANSAL(D) TR.LRS. PETITIONER-IN-PERSON

VersusMOHD ISHTYAQUDDIN K. S. RANA

ConnectedC.A. No. 7812/2013XIV-A

JAI KISHAN BANSAL(D) TR.LRS. PETITIONER-IN-PERSON

VersusMOHD.IMTIYAZ K. S. RANA

84 Crl.A. No. 1265/2012II-C

T.G.KRISHNAMURTHY. AND ORS. AMAN MOHIT HINGORANIVersusSTATE OF KARNATAKATHROUGHTARIKERE POLICE AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY

85 C.A. No. 5859/2012IV

OM PRAKASH AMAN MOHIT HINGORANIVersusSTATE OF PUNJAB V. N. RAGHUPATHY

86 C.A. No. 356/2015IV-A

M/S. NAMDHARI SEEDS PVT.LTD. KARANJAWALA & CO.VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 361-363/2015IV-A

M/S. NAMDHARI SEEDS PVT.LTD. KARANJAWALA & CO.

VersusC.I.T. AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 357/2015IV-A

M/S. INDO AMERICAL EXPORTS SENTHIL JAGADEESAN

VersusC.I.T. AND ANR.

ConnectedC.A. No. 366-367/2015IV-A

M/S. NAMDHARI SEEDS KARANJAWALA & CO.

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR.

ConnectedC.A. No. 358-360/2015IV-A

M/S. NAMDHARI SEEDS PVT.LTD. KARANJAWALA & CO.

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR.

ConnectedC.A. No. 374-376/2015IV-A

M/S. NAMDHARI SEEDS PVT.LTD. KARANJAWALA & CO.

VersusTHE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX

ConnectedC.A. No. 368-373/2015IV-A

M/S NAMDHARI SEEDS KARANJAWALA & CO.

Versus

Page 15: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …

COURT NO. : 9THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 377/2015III

C.I.T VIII ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S MONSANTO INDIA LTD. RAHUL GUPTA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 378/2015III

C.I.T VIII ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S MONSANTO INDIA LTD. RAHUL GUPTA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 379/2015III

C.I.T-VIII MUMBAI ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S MONSANTO INDIA LTD. RAHUL GUPTA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 387/2015III

C.I.T 8 ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S MONSANTO INDIA LTD. RAHUL GUPTA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 388/2015III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 8 ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S MONSANTO INDIA LTD. THROUGHITS DIRECTOR RAHUL GUPTA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 380/2015III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX V ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S MONSANTO INDIA LTD. THROUGHITS MANAGER RAHUL GUPTA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 381/2015III

COMM. OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S MONSANTO INDIA LTD. THROUGHITS MANAGER RAHUL GUPTA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 384/2015III

COMM. OF INCOME TAX-VIII, MUMBAI ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S MONSANTO INDIA LTD. RAHUL GUPTA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 386/2015III

COMM. OF INCOME TAX VIII ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusMONOSANTO INDIA LTD. RAHUL GUPTA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 383/2015III

COMM. OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusMONSANTO INDIA LTD. THROUGH ITSMANAGER RAHUL GUPTA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 382/2015III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S MONSANTO INDIA LTD. THROUGHM.D. RAHUL GUPTA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 385/2015III

C.I.T-V MUMBAI ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S MONSANTO INDIA LTD. RAHUL GUPTA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 389/2015IV-A

M/S INDO AMERICAN EXPORTS SENTHIL JAGADEESAN

Versus

Page 16: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …

COURT NO. : 9COMMISSIONER OF INCOME -TAX ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 4584/2015IV-A

M/S UPL LTD. PRAVEENA GAUTAM[P-1]

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX .AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-2]

and IA No.101654/2017-AMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLEConnectedSLP(C) No. 4579/2015IV-A

M/S. UPL LTD. PRAVEENA GAUTAM

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCIRCLE 11(4) AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-2]

and IA No.101667/2017-AMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLEConnectedSLP(C) No. 4578/2015IV-A

M/S UPL LTD. PRAVEENA GAUTAM[P-1]

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-2]

and IA No.101664/2017-AMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLEConnectedSLP(C) No. 4583/2015IV-A

M/S. UPL LTD. PRAVEENA GAUTAM, [P-1]

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX . ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-2]

and IA No.101644/2017-AMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLEConnectedSLP(C) No. 4577/2015IV-A

M/S. UPL LTD. PRAVEENA GAUTAM[P-1]

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-2]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 4582/2015IV-A

M/S UPL LTD. PRAVEENA GAUTAM[P-1]

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

and IA No.101655/2017-AMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLEConnectedSLP(C) No. 4585/2015IV-A

M/S. UPL LTD. PRAVEENA GAUTAM

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX .AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-2]

and IA No.101658/2017-AMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLE

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 7567/2015IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX TAX CBUILDING AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S UPL LTD. PRAVEENA GAUTAMand IA No.101669/2017-AMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLE

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 7566/2015IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. NAMDHARI SEEDS PVT. LTD. KARANJAWALA & CO.List alongwith C.A. No. 356 of 2017

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 6464/2015IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. ADVANTA LTD. PRAVEENA GAUTAMand IA No.106019/2017-XTRA

Page 17: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …

COURT NO. : 9ConnectedSLP(C) No. 7558/2015IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S ADVANTA LTD. PRAVEENA GAUTAMand IA No.101679/2017-AMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLE

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 19939/2015IV-A

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S NAMDHARI SEEDS KARANJAWALA & CO.

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 9949/2015IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - IBANGALORE . AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S UPL LTD. PRAVEENA GAUTAMand IA No.101686/2017-AMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLE

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 11727/2015IV-A

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S UPL LTD. PRAVEENA GAUTAMand IA No.101675/2017-AMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLE

ConnectedS.L.P.(C)...CC No.3547/2016IV-A

M/S NAMDHARI SEEDS PVT. LTD. KARANJAWALA & CO.[P-1]

Versus

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[R-1][GR], [R-2][GR]

ConnectedS.L.P.(C)...CC No.3505/2016IV-A

M/S. NAMDHARI SEEDS KARANJAWALA & CO.

Versus

ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[R-1][GR]

ConnectedS.L.P.(C)...CC No.3624/2016IV-A

M/S. NAMDHARI SEEDS KARANJAWALA & CO.

Versus

THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX ANIL KATIYAR[R-1][GR]

ConnectedS.L.P.(C)...CC No.3789/2016IV-A

M/S. NAMDHARI SEEDS KARANJAWALA & CO.

Versus

ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[R-1][GR]

ConnectedS.L.P.(C)...CC No.3804/2016IV-A

M/S NAMDHARI SEEDS KARANJAWALA & CO.

Versus

JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(OSD) ANIL KATIYAR[R-1][GR]

ConnectedS.L.P.(C)...CC No.3705/2016IV-A

M/S NAMDHARI SEEDS KARANJAWALA & CO.

Versus

JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(OSD) ANIL KATIYAR[R-1][GR]

ConnectedS.L.P.(C)...CC No.3703/2016IV-A

M/S NAMDHARI SEEDS KARANJAWALA & CO.

Versus

ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[R-1][GR]

Page 18: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …

COURT NO. : 987 C.A. No. 9289/2013

IIIB.P. SINGH RAHUL KAUSHIKVersusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

88 Crl.A. No. 1179/2012II-B

NARENDRASINH KESHUBHAI ZALA RAVI PRAKASH MEHROTRA[P-1][SCLSC]VersusSTATE OF GUJARAT ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-1]

89 C.A. No. 1537/2016XII

R.JANKIAMMAL VIKAS MEHTAVersus

S.K.KUMARASWAMY (D) THR.LRS. ANDORS.

SHOBHA RAMAMOORTHY, S. RAVI SHANKAR,PRABHA SWAMI, K. V. MOHAN, PALLAVILANGAR[R-2], [R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 1538/2016XII

S.R. SOMASUNDARAM AND ANR. S. RAVI SHANKAR, GAURAV AGRAWAL

VersusS.K.KUJMARASWAMY (D) THRU LRS. .AND ORS. AND ORS.

SHOBHA RAMAMOORTHY, VIKAS MEHTA, K.V. MOHAN

FOR FOR ON IA 5/2017 FOR [BRINGING ON RECORD LRS] ON IA 90850/201890 C.A. No. 6610/2015

XVILAKHAN SAO(D) THR. HIS L.RS. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYALVersus

PARWATI DEVI . AND ORS. BANKEY BIHARI SHARMA, SUBHASISHBHOWMICK

91 Crl.A. No. 759/2013II-B

SAMABHAI RAMSUBHAI KISHORI MANISHA T. KARIA[P-1]VersusSTATE OF GUJARAT ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-1]REF; HON'BLE COURT ORDER DATED 06.06.2019 LIST THE MATTER AFTERVACATION

92 Crl.A. No.905-908/2013II

NANHE SINGH . AND ORS. KRISHNA PAL SINGH

VersusSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND JATINDER KUMAR BHATIAand IA No.88592/2017-I/A FOR BAIL and IA No.88596/2017-EXEMPTION FROMFILING O.T. and IA No.126819/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IANo.16996/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

93 C.A. No.10423-10424/2017IV-A

H.M.SHIVANNA(D) BY LRS. AND ANR.AND ANR. BALAJI SRINIVASAN

VersusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS.AND ORS.

ANKUR S. KULKARNI, V. N. RAGHUPATHY,VAIJAYANTHI GIRISH

IA NO. 152152/2019(FOR DIRECTION) IN CA 10423-24/2017 ONLY TO BE LISTEDBEFORE THE HON'BLE COURT

94 Crl.A. No. 1290/2012II

MAHAVEER SINGH MOHD. IRSHAD HANIF[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

95 C.A. No. 11161/2017IV-A

GURUSHANTAYYA ANIL KUMARVersusGOURAVVA AND ORS. TULIKA PRAKASH, ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEELIST IN THE SECOND WEEK OF JULY-(R/P 2.05.2019 ON MENTIONING)

ConnectedC.A. No. 11162/2017IV-A

NEELAKANTAYYA TULIKA PRAKASH

VersusGURUSHANTAYYA AND ORS. ANIL KUMAR, AFTAB ALI KHAN

96 Crl.A. No.148-151/2014II

ANJUM KHAN SHAKEEL AHMED[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESHTHROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETRY

AJAY VIKRAM SINGH[R-1], P.NARASIMHAN[R-1], [R-2]

Page 19: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …

COURT NO. : 997 C.A. No. 5921/2014

XIIUNION OF INDIA AND ANR. SHAKEEL AHMED[P-1]Versus

K. KAJNA . AND ORS. AJAY VIKRAM SINGH[R-1], P.NARASIMHAN[R-1], [R-2]

98 C.A. No. 15150/2017XIV-A

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS. SHUVODEEP ROYVersus

MUKUT RANJAN SARMA . AND ORS.

SHAILESH MADIYAL, [R-6], [R-7], [R-10],[R-11], RAHUL PRATAP[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4],[R-5], [R-8], [R-9], [R-13], [R-14], [R-15], [R-16],[R-17], [R-18], [R-19], [R-20], [R-21], [R-22],[R-23], [R-24], [R-25], [R-26], [R-27], [R-28],[R-29], [R-30], [R-31], [R-32], [R-33], [R-34],[R-35], [R-36], [R-37], [R-38], [R-39], [R-40]

99 C.A. No.8031-8033/2015XII-A

THE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSANFI AVENTIS AMERIQUE DU NORDAND ORS. PRAVEEN KUMAR

100 C.A. No.6776-6777/2013III

KAZI AKILODDIN CHANDER SHEKHAR ASHRI

VersusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS. NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

101 C.A. No. 8772/2013III

SHIVAJI RAMCHANDRA SAWANT ABHA R. SHARMA[P-1]VersusDINESH RAMCHANDRA SAWANT ANDORS. S.M. JADHAV AND COMPANY[R-1], [R-2]

102 Crl.A. No. 1122/2017II-A

NANDESHWAR KUMAR SUBHRO SANYAL[P-1]Versus

RAJENDRA PRASAD PANDEY AND ORS. KUMAR MIHIR[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5],SANTOSH KUMAR - I[R-6]

103 C.A. No. 6422/2015XII-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX III ANIL KATIYARVersusSPECTRA SHARES AND SCRIPS (P)LIMITED TATINI BASU

ConnectedC.A. No. 6427/2015XII-A

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXIII ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSPECTRA SHARES AND SCRIPS PVT LTD TATINI BASU

ConnectedC.A. No. 14094/2015XII-A

PR. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX 3 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. SPECTRA SHARES AND SCRIPESPVT. LTD. TATINI BASU

ConnectedC.A. No. 14613/2015XII-A

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX 3 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S SPECTRA SHARES AND SCRIPESPVT. LTD. TATINI BASU

104 C.A. No. 9884/2013XI-A

THE STATE OF KERALA AND ORS. C. K. SASIVersusK. BHANAMMA VENKITA SUBRAMONIAM T.R

ConnectedC.A. No. 9885/2013XI-A

STATE OF KERALA . AND ORS. C. K. SASI[P-1]

VersusP.M.ANTONY VENKITA SUBRAMONIAM T.R[R-1]

Page 20: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …

COURT NO. : 9ConnectedSLP(C) No. 33132/2015XI-A

STATE OF KERALA AND ORS. C. K. SASI

VersusSAJITHA P.M. . AND ANR.

105 W.P.(C) No. 984/2013PIL-W

TELANGANA VIKAS KENDRA MANOJ C. MISHRA[P-1]VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR. C. K. SUCHARITA[R-2]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 207/2014PIL-W

VISHNU ALLURI AND ANR. PETITIONER-IN-PERSON[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.RAJESH SRIVASTAVA[R-1], CAVEATOR-IN-PERSON[R-1], AMIT SHARMA[R-1], S.. UDAYAKUMAR SAGAR[R-5]

FOR FOR ON IA 5/2017 FOR ON IA 7/2017 and IA No.86398/2017-impleading partyand IA No.86412/2017-PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW AN IA

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 166/2014PIL-W

M. RAJAMOHAN REDDY SENTHIL JAGADEESAN[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. CAVEATOR-IN-PERSON[R-1], MUKESH KUMARMARORIA[R-3]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 161/2014PIL-W

K. RAGHU RAMAKRISHNA RAJU ANDANR. N. RAJARAMAN[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA . AND ORS. CAVEATOR-IN-PERSON[R-1], B. KRISHNAPRASAD[R-2], S.. UDAYA KUMAR SAGAR[R-4]

Office Report for DirectionsConnectedW.P.(C) No. 203/2014PIL-W

M. GOPI KRISHNA NITIN KUMAR THAKUR

VersusUNION OF INDIA SUSHMA SURI, CAVEATOR-IN-PERSON

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 210/2014PIL-W

MANOHAR LAL SHARMA ADVOCATE PETITIONER-IN-PERSON[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.CAVEATOR-IN-PERSON[R-1], GUNTURPRABHAKAR[R-2], S.. UDAYA KUMARSAGAR[R-3]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 211/2014PIL-W

KARNATAKA TELUGU PRAJA SAMITHI NARESH KUMAR[P-1]

Versus

U.O.I. AND ANR. CAVEATOR-IN-PERSON, B. KRISHNAPRASAD[R-1], C. K. SUCHARITA[R-2]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 217/2014PIL-W

MATTEGUNTA RAMAKRISHNA NITIN KUMAR THAKUR[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA CAVEATOR-IN-PERSON[R-1], SUSHMASURI[R-2]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 215/2014PIL-W

PENDURTHI VENKATESH A. VENAYAGAM BALAN[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIAB. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1], SUSHMA SURI[R-1],CAVEATOR-IN-PERSON[R-1], S.. UDAYAKUMAR SAGAR[R-2]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 219/2014PIL-W

VUNDAVALLI ARUN KUMAR PETITIONER-IN-PERSON[P-1]

Versus

UOI AND ANR. CAVEATOR-IN-PERSON, B. KRISHNAPRASAD[R-1], S.. UDAYA KUMAR SAGAR[R-2]

Page 21: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …

COURT NO. : 9ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 223/2014PIL-W

MUPPALLA SUBBARAO AND ORS. A. VENAYAGAM BALAN[P-1]

Versus

UOI AND ANR. CAVEATOR-IN-PERSON, B. KRISHNAPRASAD[R-1], S.. UDAYA KUMAR SAGAR[R-2]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 224/2014PIL-W

RASTHRIYA PRAJA CONGRESS(SECULAR) A. VENAYAGAM BALAN[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.B. KRISHNA PRASAD, SUSHMA SURI[R-1],CAVEATOR-IN-PERSON[R-1], S.. UDAYAKUMAR SAGAR[R-2]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 218/2014PIL-W

K. PRABHAKAR RAJU AND ANR. A. VENAYAGAM BALAN[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. CAVEATOR-IN-PERSON[R-1], B. KRISHNAPRASAD[R-1], S.. UDAYA KUMAR SAGAR[R-2]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 228/2014PIL-W

NALLARI KIRAN KUMAR REDDY ANDORS. ANNAM D. N. RAO[P-1]

Versus

UOI AND ORS. CAVEATOR-IN-PERSON, B. KRISHNAPRASAD[R-1], S.. UDAYA KUMAR SAGAR[R-4]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 225/2014PIL-W

RAYAPATI SAMBASIVA RAO AND ANR. ANNAM D. N. RAO[P-1]

Versus

UOI AND ORS. CAVEATOR-IN-PERSON, B. KRISHNAPRASAD[R-1], S.. UDAYA KUMAR SAGAR[R-4]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 275/2014PIL-W

B. SANJEEVA RAO PETITIONER-IN-PERSON[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-2], S.. UDAYA KUMARSAGAR[R-4]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 230/2014PIL-W

MATTA JAYAKAR AND ANR. M. VIJAYA BHASKAR[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.CAVEATOR-IN-PERSON[R-1], B. KRISHNAPRASAD[R-1], D. MAHESH BABU[R-2], C. K.SUCHARITA[R-2]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 271/2014PIL-W

K.K SHERWANI R. C. KAUSHIK[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1], S.. UDAYA KUMARSAGAR[R-2]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 289/2014PIL-W

P.R. KRISHNAN AND ANR. PETITIONER-IN-PERSON[P-1], M. A.CHINNASAMY[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. AND ORS.

ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE, B. KRISHNAPRASAD[R-1], DEBOJIT BORKAKATI[R-3], [R-4],ASWATHI M.K.[R-5], SUMEET LALL[R-6],ASHOK KUMAR SINGH[R-7], P. V.YOGESWARAN[R-8], ANINDITA PUJARI[R-9],UTTARA BABBAR[R-10], RUCHI KOHLI[R-11],GOPAL SINGH[R-12], RAJIV NANDA[R-13],PARIJAT SINHA[R-14]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 344/2014PIL-W

BANDI SREEKANTH & 3 ORS CHANDAN RAMAMURTHI

VersusUOI AND ORS. SUSHMA SURI

Page 22: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …

COURT NO. : 9ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 306/2014PIL-W

CHANAMOLU LAKSHMI ANUPAMA ANDORS. R. NEDUMARAN[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1], SUSHMA SURI[R-1],S.. UDAYA KUMAR SAGAR[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 1471/2017XII-A

D.SURAYANARAYANA AND ORS. K. SARADA DEVI

VersusGOVT. OF INIDA SUSHMA SURI, D. BHARATHI REDDY

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 742/2014PIL-W

HARITHA SARANGA AND ORS. AND ORS. V. K. MONGA

VersusUNION OF INDIA GUNTUR PRABHAKAR

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 456/2014PIL-W

VISHNU ALLURI DEBASIS MISRA[P-1]

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR. SUSHMA SURI[R-1]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 470/2014PIL-W

DR.M.SHARATH CHANDRA REDDY VIPIN KUMAR JAI

VersusUNION OF INDIA . AND ORS. SUSHMA SURI

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 804/2014PIL-W

MUTTEEVI VENKATAPPA LAKSHMI ANDORS. P. VINAY KUMAR

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. AND ORS. SUSHMA SURI, S.. UDAYA KUMAR SAGAR,GUNTUR PRABHAKAR

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 132/2018PIL-W

PONGULETI SUDHAKAR REDDY D. MAHESH BABU

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA[R-3], GURMEETSINGH MAKKER[R-4], B. V. BALARAMDAS[R-5], [R-6], ANIL KATIYAR[R-7], S.. UDAYAKUMAR SAGAR[R-8], GUNTURPRABHAKAR[R-9]AMIT K. NAIN[IMPL]APPLICANT-IN-PERSON[INT]

[NOT TO BE DELETED FROM 03.08.2018]

106 Crl.A. No.278-279/2016II-A

BHUNESHWAR YADAV AKHILESH KUMAR PANDEY[P-1]

Versus

NIRMAL SINGH AND ORS. SHANTANU SAGAR[R-1], [R-2], [R-4], [R-5],NIRANJANA SINGH[R-3]

107 C.A. No. 4464/2014III

BASANT LAL S/O MOTILAL TIWARI(DEAD) THROUGH LRS. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[P-1]

VersusRAMASHANKAR S/O KAMTAPRASADTIWARI AND ORS.

NITIN BHARDWAJ[R-1], KARUNAKARMAHALIK[R-1]

108 C.A. No. 7364/2014XVI

STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. GOPAL SINGH[P-1]Versus

SHYAMA NANDAN MISHRA SHARMILA UPADHYAY[R-1], AKHILESHKUMAR PANDEY[R-1]

FOR APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS ON IA 97786/2017ALL . and IANo.136655/2017-INTERVENTION APPLICATION

ConnectedC.A. No. 7371/2014XVI

STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. GOPAL SINGH[P-1]

Versus

SARWAR AKRAM KHAN AND ORS. SATYAJEET KUMAR[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4],[R-5], DIVYA ROY[R-6]

Page 23: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …

COURT NO. : 9ConnectedC.A. No. 7373/2014XVI

STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. GOPAL SINGH[P-1]

VersusKARUNESH KUMAR AND ORS. SHANTANU SAGAR[R-1], DIVYA ROY[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 7365/2014XVI

STATE OF BIHAR GOPAL SINGH[P-1]

Versus

SUBHAS CHANDRA SINGH SATYAJEET KUMAR[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4],[R-5], [R-6]

ConnectedC.A. No. 7368/2014XVI

STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. GOPAL SINGH[P-1]

VersusJAYA TIWARY DIVYA ROY[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 7374/2014XVI

STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. GOPAL SINGH[P-1]

VersusPRABIN CHANDRA SINGH SHANTANU SAGAR[R-1]

109 C.A. No. 5943/2014III-A

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESHMEDICAL AND HEALTH SERVICES THR.PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND ORS.

ANKIT GOEL[P-1], [P-2], [P-3]

VersusDR. OM PRAKASH AGGARWAL

110 Crl.A. No.2314-2319/2014II-A

SHIV SHANKAR SAHI CHANDRA PRAKASH[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ANR. DEVASHISH BHARUKA[R-1], SUBHROSANYAL[R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5], [R-6], [R-7]

111 C.A. No.8214-8215/2016X

THE STATE OF UTTARAKHANDUTTARAKHAND PEY JAL S.V.E.N.NIGAMMANAGING DIRECTOR

SHIRIN KHAJURIA[P-1]

Versus

JAGDISH CHANDRA PANDEYRASHMI NANDAKUMAR[R-3], ANURAGKISHORE[R-5], GARVESH KABRA[R-6][PR],[R-7][PR], [R-8][PR], [R-9][PR], [R-10][PR],[R-11][PR], [R-12][PR], [R-14][PR]

ConnectedC.A. No.8216-8217/2016X

SUBHASH CHANDRA ANURAG KISHORE

Versus

THE STATE OF UTTARAKHANDSECRETARY AND ORS.

SHIRIN KHAJURIA[R-2], [R-3], GARVESHKABRA[R-16][PR]

112 C.A. No. 6815/2014III-A

U.P. RAJKIYA NIRMAN NIGAM LIMITED TUSHAR BAKSHIVersusL.N. GUPTA

113 Crl.A. No. 1856/2014II-C

RAHIL AND ANR. MOHD. IRSHAD HANIF[P-1]VersusSTATE(GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 927/2015II-C

SURAIYA MUSHTAQ AHMAD

VersusSTATE OF (GOVERNMENT OF N.C.T. OFDELHI) B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1]

114 C.A. No.10884-10885/2018XI-A

SANJAYA DAS KEDAR NATH TRIPATHY[P-1]

Versus

STATE OF ORISSA . AND ORS. SOM RAJ CHOUDHURY[R-1], [R-2], SUVENDUSUVASIS DASH[R-3]

{Fixed Date by Court for 19-11-2019 } [ RELEASED FROM PART-HEARD ]

Page 24: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …

COURT NO. : 9ConnectedC.A. No.10886-10887/2018XI-A

STATE OF ORISSA AND ANR. SOM RAJ CHOUDHURY[P-1]

Versus

SANJAYA DAS AND ANR. KEDAR NATH TRIPATHY[R-1], SUVENDUSUVASIS DASH[R-2]

{Fixed Date by Court for 19-11-2019 }ConnectedC.A. No.10888-10889/2018XI-A

CUTTACK DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SUVENDU SUVASIS DASH[P-1]

Versus

SANJAYA DAS . AND ORS. KEDAR NATH TRIPATHY[R-1], SOM RAJCHOUDHURY[R-2], [R-3]

{Fixed Date by Court for 19-11-2019 }

115 C.A. No. 773/2017XVI-A

THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIRAND ORS. M. SHOEB ALAM, [P-2], [P-3]

VersusSALEEM JAHANGIR RESHI J. P. DHANDA

116 C.A. No. 5477/2016X

MANOJ KUMAR . AND ORS. ANJANI KUMAR MISHRA[P-1]VersusSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND . THROUGHPRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND ORS.

KAMLENDRA MISHRA[R-1], [R-2], DEBASISMISRA[R-3], [R-4]

117 Crl.A. No. 1039/2015II-B

OM PARKASH SINGH ANIS AHMED KHAN[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB JASPREET GOGIA[R-1]

118 C.A. No. 9735/2016III

NAGPUR SHIKSHAN MANDAL AND ANR. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYALVersus

VARSHA VINOD SAYAM AND ANR. NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR,ANAGHA S. DESAI

ConnectedC.A. No. 9734/2016III

NAGPUR SHIKSHAN MANDAL AND ANR. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

Versus

NANDA WAKDE AND ANR. NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR,ANAGHA S. DESAI

119 C.A. No. 1443/2017XIV-A

ROSHAN LAL GUPTA (DEAD) THROUGHLRS. PIYUSH SHARMA[P-1.4], [P-1.3], [P-1.2], [P-1.1]

VersusIDBI BANK LIMITED AND ANR. RABIN MAJUMDER

120 Crl.A. No. 334/2015II-A

SATISH PURUSHOTTAM AUSHAL ANDANR. ANAGHA S. DESAI, [P-2]

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKARFOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 18856/2016

ConnectedSLP(Crl) No. 1306/2015II-A

VILAS PURUSHOTTAM AUSHAL ANAGHA S. DESAI

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

121 Crl.A. No. 106/2018II-C

MALTI @ K.S. PRIYA @ SHANTI @PREMKUMARI AND ANR. KAMINI JAISWAL[P-1], [P-2]

VersusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH SUMEER SODHI[R-1][GR]

122 C.A. No.5208-5211/2017XII

V. MASILAMANI AND ORS. ETC. ETC.AND ANR.

ANKUR S. KULKARNI, GURMEET SINGHMAKKER

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ETC. ETC.AND ANR. VIJAY KUMAR, SRIRAM P.

IA No.91307/2017-EARLY HEARING APPLICATION IS TO BE LISTED.

Page 25: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …

COURT NO. : 9123 C.A. No. 5780/2015

XVIRSHAD(D)THROUGH LRS. SHOBHA GUPTA[P-1]VersusSHARAFAT HUSSAIN PRATIBHA JAIN[R-1]

124 Crl.A. No. 828/2015II-A

SANJAY VITHHAL PACHAGHARE B. K. PALVersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

125 Crl.A. No. 1203/2015II-B

RAKESH KUMAR SINGH VIVEK NARAYAN SHARMA[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL PLR CHAMBERS AND CO.[R-1]

126 C.A. No. 132/2016XIV-A

CANON INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED H. RAGHAVENDRA RAOVersusDEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 135/2016XIV-A

SONY ERICSSON MOBILECOMMUNICATIONS INDIA PVT.LTD.(NOW) MERGED WITH SONY INDIA PVTLTD) NEW DELHI

AMBHOJ KUMAR SINHA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-III,NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 138/2016XIV-A

SONY ERICSSON MOBILECOMMUNICATION INDIA PVT. LTD.(NOW MERGED WITH SONY INDIA PVTLTD)

AMBHOJ KUMAR SINHA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-III ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 137/2016XIV-A

CANON INDIA PVT. LTD. H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO[P-1]

VersusDEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX CIRCLE 3(1) NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

FOR PERMISSION TO PLACE ADDITIONAL FACTS AND GROUNDS ON IA102664/2018

ConnectedC.A. No. 136/2016XIV-A

CANON INDIA PVT. LTD. H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO[P-1]

VersusDEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX CIRCLE 3(1) ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 139/2016XIV-A

CASIO INDIA CO. PVT. LTD. KISHORE KUNAL

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 141/2016XIV-A

CASIO INDIA CO. PVT. LTD. THR. MASAONAKA, MD KISHORE KUNAL

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 140/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NEWDELHI ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

M/S. CANNON INDIA PVT. LTD. H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO, ANIL KUMARGAUTAM

ConnectedC.A. No. 2669/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IV ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S HAIER APPLIANCES INDIA PVT.LTD.

Page 26: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …

COURT NO. : 9ConnectedC.A. No. 143/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NEWDELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S DAIKIN AIR-CONDITIONING INDIAPVT. LTD. ANIL KUMAR GAUTAM

ConnectedC.A. No. 2668/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IV ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. HAIER APPLICANCES INDIA PVT.LTD.

ConnectedC.A. No. 142/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-VNEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S REEBOK INDIA COMPANY LTD. KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No. 144/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-8 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. SHARP BUSINESS SYSTEMS INDIALTD. POOJA DHAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 151/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NEWDELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. DAIKIN AIR - CONDITIONING INDIAPVT. LTD. ANIL KUMAR GAUTAM

ConnectedC.A. No. 145/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I,NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. CASIO INDIA CO. PVT. LTD KISHORE KUNAL

ConnectedC.A. No. 147/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. CASIO INDIA CO. (P) LTD. KISHORE KUNAL

ConnectedC.A. No. 146/2016XIV-A

REEBOK INDIA COMPANY LTD. KAVITA JHA

VersusADDL. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 148/2016XIV-A

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX CIRCLE 3 (1) NEW DEHI ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S CANON INDIA PVT. LTD. H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3937/2017XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX IV ANIL KATIYAR

VersusDISCOVERY COMMUNICATION INDIA SHEKHAR PRIT JHA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 150/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX III ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSTRYKER INDIA PVT. LTD. V. N. RAGHUPATHY

ConnectedC.A. No. 149/2016XIV-A

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

Versus

M/S. CANON INDIA PVT. LTD. H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO, ANIL KUMARGAUTAM[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 521/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 1,NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. AMADEUS INDIA PVT. LTD. SHEKHAR PRIT JHA

Page 27: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …

COURT NO. : 9ConnectedC.A. No. 527/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 9 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusTOSHIBA INDIA PVT. LTD. AMBHOJ KUMAR SINHA

ConnectedC.A. No. 526/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXDELHI - 8 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. SHARPA BUSINESS SYSTEM(INDIA) PVT. LTD. POOJA DHAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 152/2016XIV-A

REEBOK INDIA COMPANY KAVITA JHA

VersusADDL. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ConnectedC.A. No. 1219/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NEWDELHI ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S. CANON INDIA PVT. LTD. H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2703/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CIRCLE 3(1) ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S. CANON INDIA PVT. LTD. H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 4808/2016XIV-A

HAIER APPLIANCES (INDIA ) P. LTD. KAVITA JHA

VersusDEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX

ConnectedC.A. No. 5024/2016XIV-A

HAIER APPLIANCES (INDIA) PVT. LTD. KAVITA JHA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ConnectedC.A. No. 4809/2016XIV-A

HAIER APPLIANCES (INDIA) PVT. LTD. KAVITA JHA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX

ConnectedC.A. No. 4412/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -IVNEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusHAIER APPLIANCES INDIA PVT LTD

ConnectedC.A. No. 5909/2016XIV-A

DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusHONDA SIEL POWER PRODUCTS LTD. KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No.5905-5906/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusBAUSCH AND LOMB EYECARE (INDIA)PVT. LTD. PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 5903/2016XIV-A

ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusBAUSCH AND LOMB EYECARE (INDIA)PVT. LTD. PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 5904/2016XIV-A

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

Versus

Page 28: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …

COURT NO. : 9BAUSCH AND LOMB EYECARE (INDIA)PVT. LTD. PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 6485/2016XIV-A

THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX RANGE 2 ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusBAUSCH AND LOMB EYECARE (INDIA )PVT LTD PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 3953/2017XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusMARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD. KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No. 3954/2017XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD. KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No.11110-11111/2016XIV-A

ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusBAUSCH PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMARand FOR AMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLE ON IA 119430/2017

ConnectedC.A. No. 2572/2017XIV-A

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. AVERY DENNISION (INDIA) PVTLTD KAVITA JHA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2430/2017XIV-A

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXDELHI 2 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S BAUSCH AND LOMB EYE CAREINDIA PVT LTD PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 3070/2017XIV-A

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX- 1 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusAVERY DENNISON (INDIA) PVT LTD KAVITA JHA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 5514/2017XIV-A

PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-09 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S TOSHIBA INDIA PVT LTD AMBHOJ KUMAR SINHA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8403/2017XIV-A

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX DELHI-2 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S BOSE CORPORATION INDIA PVTLTD HARISH PANDEY[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8404/2017XIV-A

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX, DELHI 2 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S BOSE CORPORATION (INDIA) PVT.LTD HARISH PANDEY[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 11201/2017XIV-A

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX CIRCLE 4 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusLE PASSAGE TO INDIA TOURS ANDTRAVELS (P) LTD. KAVITA JHA[R-1]

IA No.80934/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.80937/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

Page 29: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …

COURT NO. : 9ConnectedC.A. No. 15498/2017XIV-A

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusLE PASSAGE TO INDIA TOURS ANDTRAVELS (P) LTD KAVITA JHA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 17811/2017XIV-A

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusBAUSCH AND LOMB EYECARE INDIAPVT LTD PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 21852/2017XIV-A

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX4 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusHONDA SIEL POWER PRODUCTS LTD.

ConnectedC.A. No. 19984/2017XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 4NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusHONDA SIEL POWER PRODUCTS LTD KAVITA JHA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 1826/2018XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 4 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusHONDA SIEL POWER PRODUCTS LTD.IA No.14992/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING

ConnectedSLP(C) No.13384-13385/2018XIV

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

AMADEUS INDIA PVT LTD SHEKHAR PRIT JHA[R-1]FOR FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA64556/2018

ConnectedDiary No. 10952-2018XIV

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusVALVOLINE CUMMINS PVT. LTD.

ConnectedC.A. No. 4652/2018XIV-A

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXDELHI I ANIL KATIYAR

VersusAVERY DENNISON (INDIA) PVT. LTD.

ConnectedDiary No. 13295-2018XIV

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX 9 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusVALVOLINE CUMMINS PVT. LTD.FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.55855/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.55856/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNEDJUDGMENT

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 16882/2018XIV

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 4 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusHONDA SIEL POWER PRODUCTS LTD. KAVITA JHAFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.78320/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.78322/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNEDJUDGMENT

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 20829/2018XV

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S GILLETTE INDIA LTD. TARUN GUPTA[R-1]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.76572/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.76573/2018-PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF DATES

Page 30: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …

COURT NO. : 9ConnectedSLP(C) No. 16881/2018XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 4 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S HONDA SIEL POWER PRODUCTSLTD. KAVITA JHA

FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.77389/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.77390/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNEDJUDGMENT

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 16885/2018XIV

THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX 4 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusHONDA SIEL POWER PRODUCTS LTD.FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.82614/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 20837/2018XV

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S GILLETTE INDIA LTD DIRECTOR TARUN GUPTA[R-1]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.86519/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 17094/2018XIV

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 6DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusMAKE MY TRIP INDIA PVT. LTD SHEKHAR PRIT JHA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 9624/2018XV

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXALWAR ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S GILLETTE INDIA LTD. TARUN GUPTA[R-1]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.118232/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.118233/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THEIMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.118234/2018-PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHYLIST OF DATES

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 22239/2019XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX III ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S SONY INDIA PVT. LTD.FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.134327/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.134329/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THEIMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.134326/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INREFILING

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 15803/2019XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX III ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S SONY INDIA PVT LTDIA No.94691/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING

127 C.A. No. 10433/2016III

SMT. SUSHILABAI TUKARAM PATIL ANDANR. SACHIN PATIL

VersusSUBHASH KAKASAHEB PATIL . ANDORS. S.M. JADHAV AND COMPANY

128 Crl.A. No.1410-1412/2015II-A

RAJKUMAR SHASHIBHUSHAN P. ADGAONKAR

Versus

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA POLICESTATON INCHARGE AND ORS.

NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR[R-1], AMOL B.KARANDE[R-2]

ConnectedSLP(Crl.)...CRLMP No.4705-4706/2016II-A

LAXMAN S/O DADARAO KARANDE AMOL B. KARANDE

Versus

Page 31: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …

COURT NO. : 9RAJKUMAR AND ANR.

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1823/2017II-A

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

VersusRAJKUMAR

129 Crl.A. No.1419-1420/2015II-A

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

VersusRAMESH JIJEBA LAHANE MANJU JETLEYMR. MAHABIR SINGH, SENIOR ADVOCATE APPOINTED AS AMICUS CURIAE TOASSIST THE HON. COURT IN THE INSTANT MATTER

130 C.A. No.21828-21831/2017XII

M.R. SRINIVASAN AND ORS. ETC. ANDORS. GAGAN GUPTA[P-1]

VersusASSOCIATION OF TAMIL NADUHIGHWAYS ENGINEERS AND ORS. ETC.

PRANAV SACHDEVA[R-1], VINODH KANNAB.[R-2], K. V. VIJAYAKUMAR[R-3][GR]

131 Crl.A. No. 616/2016II

DHARAMPAL AND ANR. VARINDER KUMAR SHARMA[P-1]Versus

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH RUCHIRA GOEL[R-1], FARRUKHRASHEED[R-1]

and IA No.7690/2018-BAIL APPLICATION132 C.A. No. 9927/2016

III-AGYANENDRA SINGH ABHA R. SHARMAVersusJOINT DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION ANDORS.On mentioning, as per Hon'ble Court's Order dated 15.04.2019, List the matter on24.04.2019 before the appropriate Bench as per the roster.

133 C.A. No. 7257/2016III-A

VIPIN KUMAR SINGH YASH PAL DHINGRA[P-1]VersusSTATE OF U.P THR. PRINCIPALSECRETARY . AND ORS.

GARIMA PRASHAD[R-1], TANMAYAAGARWAL[R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5]

List the appeals for final hearing in January, 2017.ConnectedC.A. No. 7258/2016III-A

SHRAVAN KUMAR ASHA GOPALAN NAIR[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ANDORS.

KRISHNANAND PANDEYA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],VINAY GARG[R-4]

and IA No.105549/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.134 C.A. No. 6122/2016

XVISAHID ALIM AND ORS. AND ORS. CHANDRA PRAKASHVersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. ANDORS. SAMIR ALI KHAN[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

LIST IN THE MONTH OF JULY 2019 VIDE HON'BLE COURT'S ORDER DATED28/01/2019

135 C.A. No. 7397/2016III-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. GURMEET SINGH MAKKER[P-1], [P-2], [P-3]VersusGAJENDRA TEWARI ANURAG KISHORE[R-1]As per Court's Order dated 25.01.2019 list the appeal in the month of March, 2019before the appropriate Bench.

136 Crl.A. No. 44/2017II-C

MOHD. VAKIL AFTAB ALI KHAN[P-1]VersusSTATE(GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1]

137 Crl.A. No. 1121/2016II-C

ANWAR ALI AND ANR. ANJANI KUMAR MISHRA[P-1][PR], [P-2][PR]VersusTHE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ABHINAV MUKERJI[R-1][GR]FOR FINAL ARGUMENTS VIDE HON'BLE COURT'S ORDER DATED 02.07.2018.

Page 32: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …

COURT NO. : 9138 Crl.A. No. 1078/2017

II-ATHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[P-1]VersusRAMESH ANIS AHMED KHAN[R-1]

139 Crl.A. No. 1688/2017II-C

SHIV KUMAR ALIAS JAWAHAR SARAF SUBHASISH BHOWMICK[P-1]VersusRAMAVTAR AGARWAL T. HARISH KUMAR

140 Crl.A. No. 1229/2017II-C

CHAMAN LAL RADHIKA GAUTAM[P-1][PR]VersusTHE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AJAY MARWAH[R-1][GR]HEARING EXPEDITED VIDE HON'BLE COURT'S ORDER DATED 21.07.2018 AND04.07.2018.FOR FINAL ARGUMENTS AND DISPOSAL VIDE HON'BLE COURT'SORDER DATED 04.07.2018.

141 Crl.A. No. 117/2017II-A

ATUL M. PAREKH KAMINI JAISWALVersusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 139/2017II-A

SUDHIR S. MEHTA KAMINI JAISWAL

VersusCENTRAL BUREAUOF INVESTIGATION MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA[R-1]FOR FOR APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION ON IA 139015/2019

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 138/2017II-A

DEEPAK BHUPATRAI MEHTA KAMINI JAISWAL

VersusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA[R-1]FOR

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 136/2017II-A

R. SITARAMAN ABHIMANUE SHRESTHA

VersusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION MUKESH KUMAR MARORIAFOR

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 140/2017II-A

COODLI RAVI KUMAR AND ANR. JAYANT KUMAR MEHTA

VersusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONAND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 137/2017II-A

SEETHAPATHY SURESH BABU JATIN ZAVERI[P-1]

VersusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA[R-1]

142 C.A. No. 4934/2017III

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX I ANIL KATIYAR

VersusADANI ENTERPRISES LTD TARUNA SINGH GOHIL[R-1]

143 C.A. No. 82/2019III

SURAT MUNICIPAL CORPORATION MUNAWWAR NASEEM[P-1]VersusGAURAV KANVAR JUNEJA AND ORS. RUPESH KUMAR[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

144 Crl.A. No. 1730/2017II-B

VINOBHAI M. P. VINODVersusSTATE OF KERALA G. PRAKASH[R-1]

145 Crl.A. No. 1801/2017II-A

THE STATE OF BIHAR NIRANJANA SINGH[P-1]VersusKAMESHWAR PRASAD YADAV ASHWANI KUMAR DUBEY[R-1]

146 Crl.A. No. 1537/2017II-B

JAYRAJSINH TEMUBHA JADEJA R. C. KOHLI[P-1]Versus

THE STATE OF GUJARAT ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-1]RAHUL GUPTA[I-1][IMPL]

Page 33: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …

COURT NO. : 9

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1538/2017II-B

AMARJITSINH ANIRUDHDHSINH JADEJAAND ANR. E. C. AGRAWALA[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF GUJARAT ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-1]RAHUL GUPTA[I-1][IMPL]

147 Crl.A. No. 132/2018II-C

SHRI DEEPAK SRIVASTAV RITESH KUMAR CHOWDHARYVersusTHE STATE OF DELHI B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 133/2018II-C

RAJENDER SRIVASTAV RITESH KUMAR CHOWDHARY

Versus

STATE OF DELHI DEBASIS MISRA[CAVEAT], B. V. BALARAMDAS[R-1]

148 C.A. No. 2201/2018IV-A

ASHOK KUMAR GOYAL AND ANR. PRATIBHA JAINVersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ANDORS. B. S. BANTHIA[CAVEAT], ARJUN GARG[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2202/2018IV-A

ASHOK KUMAR GOYAL AND ANR. CHRISTI JAIN

VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ANDORS. B. S. BANTHIA[CAVEAT], ARJUN GARG[R-1]

FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA159123/2018 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 159125/2018

ConnectedCONMT.PET.(C) No.1072/2018 in C.A. No.2201/2018IV-A

ASHOK KUMAR GOYAL AND ANR. PRATIBHA JAIN

Versus

ABHAY CHAUDHARY AND ORS. B. S. BANTHIA[R-1], [R-2], [R-4], [R-5]

IN C.A. No. - 2201/2018,

ConnectedC.A. No.4533-4534/2019IV-A

FIRM M/S GWALIOR LAND DEALS ANDFINANCE THROUGH PARTNER HARISHANKAR GOYAL(DEAD) THROUGH LRS

CHRISTI JAIN

VersusSURESH KUMAR AND ORS. ABHINAV RAMKRISHNA[R-4.1]

149 Crl.A. No. 404/2018II-C

ARUN KUMAR AMIT AGRAWALVersusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANR.

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 405/2018II-C

ARUN KUMAR AMIT AGRAWAL

VersusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANR.FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.31495/2018-PERMISSION TO FILE SLP/TP

150 C.A. No. 11923/2018XIV-A

MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD. (EARLIERKNOWN AS MARUTI UDYOG LTD.) KAVITA JHA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXDELHI ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]

[ RETAIN ITS POSITION ]

ConnectedC.A. No. 11924/2018XIV-A

MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD. (EARLIERKNOWN AS MARUTI UDYOG LTD.) KAVITA JHA

VersusCOMMSSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 11841/2018XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX. ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

Page 34: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …

COURT NO. : 9MARUTI UDYOG LTD. KAVITA JHA[CAVEAT]

ConnectedC.A. No. 11842/2018XIV-A

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXDELHI 6 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusMARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD KAVITA JHA[CAVEAT]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.119420/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 32929/2018XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX II ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusMARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LIMITED(FORMERLY KNOWN M/S. MARUTIUDYOG LTD.)

KAVITA JHA

IA No.140408/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.140410/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

ConnectedC.A. No. 11919/2018XIV-A

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 6(FORMERLY COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX II) NEW DELHI

ANIL KATIYAR

VersusMARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LIMITED(FORMERLY MARUTI UDYOG LTD.) NEWDELHI

KAVITA JHA[CAVEAT]

FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.137205/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.137207/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THEIMPUGNED JUDGMENT

ConnectedC.A. No. 11920/2018XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXDELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. MARUTI UDYOG LTD. KAVITA JHA[CAVEAT]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.155109/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.155110/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING

ConnectedDiary No. 33387-2018XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME II ANIL KATIYAR

VersusMARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LIMITED(FORMERLY MARUTI UDYOG LTD.) KAVITA JHA[CAVEAT]

FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.151988/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.151989/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING

ConnectedC.A. No. 11921/2018XIV-A

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX 6 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusMARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD. THROUGHDIRECTOR KAVITA JHA[CAVEAT][CAVEAT]

FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.142970/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING [ TO BE TAKEN UP ALONG WITH ITEM NO.45 I.E. SLP(C)NO.9074/2018 ]

ConnectedC.A. No. 11977/2018XIV-A

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 6(FORMERLY COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX II)

ANIL KATIYAR

VersusMARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LIMITED(FORMERLY MARUTI UDYOG LTD.) KAVITA JHA[CAVEAT][CAVEAT]

FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.143757/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

ConnectedC.A. No. 11835/2018XIV-A

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME 6 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusMARUTI SUZUKI LIMITED KAVITA JHA[CAVEAT][CAVEAT]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.157069/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

Page 35: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …

COURT NO. : 9ConnectedC.A. No. 34/2019XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusMARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LIMITED KAVITA JHA[CAVEAT][CAVEAT]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.154277/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

ConnectedC.A. No. 33/2019XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXDELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusMARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LIMITED KAVITA JHA[CAVEAT]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.159765/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 3826/2019XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXDELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusMARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LIMITED KAVITA JHA[CAVEAT]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.181936/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.181938/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 6631/2019XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S MARUTI UDYOG LIMITED (NOWKNOWN AS MARUTI SUZUKI INDIALIMITED

KAVITA JHA[CAVEAT][CAVEAT]

FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.13185/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.13192/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING

ConnectedDiary No. 44704-2018XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX II ANIL KATIYAR

VersusMARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD. KAVITA JHA[CAVEAT]

ConnectedDiary No. 23919-2019XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 6 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusMARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD. KAVITA JHA[CAVEAT]

151 Crl.A. No. 641/2018II-A

KAILAS S/O JAGANNATH PRADHAN ANDANR. JAY KISHOR SINGH

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ANDORS.

KAILAS BAJIRAO AUTADE[CAVEAT], NISHANTRAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR[R-1]

152 C.A. No. 4418/2018XIV-A

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFWEALTH TAX, I NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S ORIENTAL BUILDING ANDFURNISHING CO. LTD MANAGINGDIRECTORFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.54053/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.54056/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNEDJUDGMENT

ConnectedC.A. No. 4417/2018XIV-A

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFWEALTH TAX 1 DELHI TA ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S ORIENTAL BUILDING ANDFURNISHING CO. LTD.FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.54114/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.54115/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNEDJUDGMENT

153 Crl.A. No. 725/2019II

AJAY P. MATHEW PROMILAVersus

Page 36: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF …

COURT NO. : 9

THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND ANR. S.. UDAYA KUMAR SAGAR[R-1], AJAY VIKRAMSINGH[R-2]

[ List in the second week of August, 2019 ]

154 C.A. No. 8989/2018III

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX AHMEDABAD ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S NIRMA LIMITED MOHIT D. RAM[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 9815/2018III

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX AHMEDABAD ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S NIRMA LIMITED MOHIT D. RAM

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 27976/2018III

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S NIRMA LIMITED MOHIT D. RAM[R-1]

155 Crl.A. No. 510/2017II

NARSINGH PAL VARINDER KUMAR SHARMA[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH SHASHANK SHEKHAR SINGH[R-1]{Fixed Date by Court for 20-11-2019 } [ TOP OF THE BOARD ]

156 C.A. No. 5758/2009XVI

SHYAMAL KANTI DAS MRIDULA RAY BHARADWAJVersus

SANKAR KUMAR GHOSH AND ORS. RUPESH KUMAR, PLR CHAMBERS ANDCO.[R-14], [R-15], [R-16], [R-17]

{Fixed Date by Court for 21-11-2019 } [ RETAIN ITS POSITION ]

NEW DELHI15-11-2019 17:01:09

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR