suppressed inventions - a book report by hal fox

VOLUME 6, NUMBER 9 ISSN 1075-0045 MAY 1999

Web Page: www.padrak.com/ine/ E-mail: [email protected] or [email protected]

SUPPRESSED INVENTIONS - A BOOK REPORTBy Hal Fox

Johnathan Eisen, Suppressed Inventions & OtherDiscoveries, Avery Publishing Group, Garden CityPark, NY, 546 pages, indexed, references, illus.,c1999, ISBN 0-89529-809-0.

If you are an optimist, this is a book you won'twant to read but you should. The prevailing thesisof this book is that many inventions, medical cures,many energy-related inventions, and other valuablediscoveries have been suppressed. Some inventorshave been threatened, shot, or killed. Here are themajor section headings from the table of contents:The Suppression of Alternative Medical TherapiesThe Suppression of Unorthodox ScienceThe Suppression of UFO Technologies andExtraterrestrial ContactThe Suppression of Fuel Savers and AlternateEnergy Resources

As an expert reporter on new-energy topics, this bookreview emphasizes the energy-related discoveries.The energy section begins with the story of NikolaTesla, continues with the energy-producing inventionof Lester J. Hendershot, T. Henry Moray, water as afuel, Archie Blue, Francisco Pacheo, automotivedevelopments (especially carburetors), CharlesPogue, and suppressed fuel savers.

While the author and his selected writings support thetitle of the book, they do so at the expense ofoccasional alternative explanations. For example, thefailure of the automotive industry to adopt fuel-savingdevices is adopted as suppression when it may be justmanagement inertia, "If it ain't broke, don't fix it."The trashing of laboratories (many citations) may notalways be from active suppression. Someembarrassed inventors, unwilling to admit to theirinvestors, that they couldn't solve the problem theywere so sure they could solve, trash their ownlaboratories and move on. Some deaths of inventors,such as T. Henry Moray and Nikola Tesla,

may just have been from old age without outsidehelp. Nevertheless, the author makes a strong pointthat there was, is now, and probably will be thesuppression of inventions in the future.

There is no question but that inventions anddiscoveries have been suppressed. This authorhas been reporting for almost ten years on the partial-success in suppressing cold fusion. This suppressionis briefly mentioned. The reader should feel indebtedto the author and those who helped provideinformation for this book. Anyone who is working thein the fields of new medical or new-energy discoveriesshould treat this book as a text book on what not todo. All other readers should join in the sharing ofinformation about new, proven technologies and newmedical discoveries (even if they come from herbsand not from the pharmaceutical companies). Thegoal should be to spread information in order tominimize suppression.

New inventions cannot be suppressed if theinformation is shared worldwide on the internet. It issuggested that in the next edition of this book, theauthor adds a chapter on the value of disseminationof information. Much of the suppression of newinventions appears to be from the unwillingness ofmany inventors to share their information. Manyinventions have been bought up and shelved due togreed and the fear of lose of existing markets. Manyinventors died with their secrets because they wereunwilling to share their secrets (usually for anothertype of greed: the fear of losing vast wealth). Someinventors just lacked the courage or the means tobattle the status quo.

Recently, the medical establishment, through theFood and Drug Administration tried to force herbalremedies to be handled through the FDA and causeproducers to spend millions of dollars to prove that aspecific herb was beneficial. The hue and cry from

2 MAY 1999

©1999 by Fusion Information Center, Inc. COPYING NOT ALLOWED without written permission. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Fusion Briefings

producers, herbalists, and users plus the support ofmembers of Congress (such as Senator Hatch) plusprevious legislation in favor of natural substances,caused the FDA to back off. There is a real lessonthere and a real lesson given to us by JohnathanEisen. Individuals can be suppressed. It is muchmore difficult to suppress large groups, especially infree countries. It is much easier to suppress a secret.It is much more difficult to suppress sharedknowledge. Buy the book. Sit down and read it.Then find a real invention or discovery that unbiasedprofessionals will agree has commercial potential.The next step is to stand up and make your opinionmean something. Spread the word. Help get financialsupport for the invention. Help get political support.But make sure that you are not supporting someimpractical idea. Example: anyone with a littleworking knowledge of internal combustion enginescan improve a carburetor to get the extra miles pergallon. All you have to do is to make a leaner mixture.But most of the carburetor inventions would not allowyou to drive from the hot desert to the cold ski slopeswithout considerable carburetor adjustments. Manyof the better-mileage inventions are not commerciallypractical and were not suppressed, they died for lackof proper engineering support. There used to be anannual most miles to a gallon contest. Leanmixture, very careful acceleration, constant speed,hard tires, etc. and nearly all the entries could get 80to 100 miles per gallon. Obviously, that is not acommercial method of improving gas mileage.

Here is another example of a highly-touted inventionthat today is commercially impractical: Tesla's world-wide broadcast of power. One could tap this energyfrom any place in the world, provided that you onlyused a small amount of power. Tesla calculatedand stated that there could be enough powergenerated to complete with Niagara Falls. Today,Tesla's entire power output from tuning up the earth toionosphere capacitor wouldn't power Salt Lake City.Tesla's idea was marvelous but impractical. Tesla'ssolution to use alternating current rather than directcurrent was an enormously more valuable idea. Thewidespread use of Tesla coils would disrupt enormousamounts of communication. Tesla coils and otherarcing-type devices should only be used in a screenroom which keeps most of the electromagneticinterference isolated.

Jonathan Eisen has done the world a great favor bywriting this compendium of suppressed inventions. Itis the kind of book that may cause some people tothink. Thinking may not be popular, but it is

important. Thinking people can be moved to talkaction. In the case of suppression of inventions, thebest place to start is with the biggest suppressor: TheUnited States government. Anyone who develops atechnology using government funds shouldunderstand that the government has the right toclassify such work -- it is often desired for nationalsecurity, such as with new weapons development.However, the government should not have theright to classify the work of inventors who do notuse government funds. This is the most importantplace to begin to stop the unnecessary suppression ofinventions! If you want to do something for yourcountry, get the facts about the law that allows thegovernment to suppress inventions -- then get on theinternet and drum up support to change the law. Youwill become a hero.

EVEN SIGMUND FREUDCourtesy of Tom Bearden

Even Sigmund Freud commented on the suppressionof innovation by science, in these words:

“There are three steps in the history of a greatdiscovery. First, its opponents say that the discovereris crazy; later that he is sane but that his discovery isof no real importance; and last, that the discovery isimportant but everybody has known it right along.”

Arthur C. Clarke himself summarized the treatment ofscientific innovation today in these dry terms:

"If they [quantum fluctuations of vacuum] can be[tapped], the impact upon our civilization will beincalculable. Oil, coal, nuclear, hydropower, wouldbecome obsolete - and so would many of our worriesabout environmental pollution." "Don't sell your oilshares yet -- but don't be surprised if the world againwitnesses the four stages of response to any new andrevolutionary development: 1. It's crazy! 2. It may bepossible -- so what? 3. I said it was a good idea allalong. 4. I thought of it first." Arthur C. Clarke, in"Space Drive: A Fantasy That Could Become Reality"NSS ... AD ASTRA, Nov/Dec 1994, p. 38.

MODERN TIMES

Those who can work, do work.Those who can talk, use cell phones.Those who can write, use laptops.Those who can't, watch TV or surf the web.

NEW ENERGY NEWS 3


Rad-Waste

TWO THOUGHTS ON THE TEMPEST

From the New York Times web site / science forums,“Science in the News” on April 8 1999.

Two responses to “A Tempest in a Test Tube 10Years Later,” by William J. Broad, published NYT , Mar23, 1999.*****************To every one who is discussing the FemtosecondScience and Fusion:

Please beware what was reported in TEST TUBEexperiments by Pons and his cohort from UTAH andwhat is being done under the label TABLE TOP are asdifferent as DAY & NIGHT The Utah claims werepatently wishful thinking,,,, and I wish them all thefreedom of wishful thinking.

The idea of using lasers and plasma studies are not tobe talked in the same breath as Utah Cold Fusion,that is asking someone to listen to Beethoven's 9thand at the same time compare it to howls of a hyena.

/s/ mercury610 - 01:16pm Apr 8, 1999 EST (#243 of244)

**************Your article of March 23, “A Tempest in a Test Tube,10 Years Later,” by William J. Broad, seems to havebeen the catalyst to trigger an onslaught of table-topfusion activity. The most recent is reported today in

Nature magazine, April 8, “Nuclear Fusion fromExplosions of Femtosecond Laser-heated DeuteriumClusters,” (www.nature.com), also recently reported inUS News & World Report, April 5, 1999, “Fusion inMiniature.” This is no surprise to Sir Arthur C. Clarke.In the June 5, 1998, issue of Science magazine(www.sciencemag.org), he writes about table-top

fusion, “The literature on the subject is nowenormous, and my confidence that the “new energy”is real, has slowly climbed to the 90th percentile andhas reached the 99% level.” In issue 22, vol. 4 ofInfinite Energy magazine (www.infinite-energy.com),Sir Arthur also states, “If a plasma fusion rocket couldbe developed, it would open up the solar system, justas the airplane opened up this planet.” Hispremonition is very accurate. We have been studyinga nano-scale miniature fusion plasma of sustainedduration within gas vapor of hydrogen or deuteriumand free-floating iron atoms. The iron atoms act muchlike molecular sized damping rods to hold and sustainthe fusion reaction in the same manner as in nuclearfission. Our application is directed towards fusionrocket power. Our web site has received widespreadpopular interest and is the first hit for “SpaceVentures” in Yahoo search. Sir Arthur C. Clarke hassent us a very complimentary email which is shown asa link on the site.

/s/ chuck_bennett - 02:42pm Apr 8, 1999 EST (#244of 244)

Courtesy of Chuck Bennett, President, SpaceVentures, P.O. Box 277721, Sacramento CA, 95827phone: 916-361-0722email: [email protected]

NEW NUCLEAR WASTE PLANCourtesy of Richard Shamp

Joby Warrick, "U.S. to Offer Nuclear Waste Plan,National News, 25 Feb 1999, p A2.

EDITOR'S SUMMARY

Energy Sectretary Bill Richardson has offered a newplan to handle the 77,000 tons of highly-radioactivespent furel pellets that are currently stored on site byvarious nuclear power plants. The DOE wassupposed to take possession of these spent fuelpellets in 1998, however, as there was no place

COLD FUSION BIBLIOGRAPHY

Just updated and revised, the most completebibliography of New Energy research papersand articles [predominantly cold fusion] isavailable again from the Fusion InformationCenter on 2 disks [PC]. Containing over 2500references, it traces the progress of coldfusion research since its beginning in 1989through the abstracts and articles published inFusion Facts, the world's first cold fusionnewsletter/magazine, and abstracted fromother scientif ic publications. SpecifyWordPerfect v6.1 version, or ASCII version.$15.00 ppd.

4 MAY 1999


Miscellaneous

prepared to store this radioactive waste, the DOE hashad to work out other arrangements. PresidentClinton is opposed to the creation of a specialtemporary storage site at or near the Yucca Mountainwhere several billion has been spent to determine ifthat Nevada site is suitable for long-term storage.The real issue (but not known to the writer) is thecurrent development of methods for on-sitestabilization (transmutation) of the spent fuel pellets.

Tony Batt, "House panel balks at Richardson's wasteplan," Las Vegas Review Jrnl, March 13, 1999.(Courtesy of Gary Vesperman.)

EDITOR'S SUMMARY

The House panel gave a chilly reception to keepingthe nuclear wastes at utility sites. Rep. Joe Barton(R-Texas) is pushing a bill to set up temporary nuclearwaste site at the Nevada Test Site no later than June3, 2003. Richardson told the committee that DOEwould need an added $6 billion for the wasterepository. [My! What would $6 billion do indeveloping on-site waste remediation? Ed.]

TRANSMUTATIONCourtesy of Remy Chevalier

"Transmutation Of Nuclear Waste” New Scientist, 16Jan 1999; p 31.

SUMMARY

This is a three-page article on potential and future oftransmutation technologies. Two websites aresuggested for further reading: www-adtt.lanl.gov andw w w . c e rn . c h / C ER N / A nn ou n c em e n t s / 1 9 94 /Energy/Amplifier.html

MILLENNIAL SCIENCE

S. Inomata (President, JPI., Niigata, Japan),“Prospect for the 21st Century Science,” revisedEnglish translation, JPI NEWS, Jan 1999.

By the success of the 2nd Int. Symposium onConsciousness, New Medicine and New Energy, thisyear 1999 has become a year of great leap forward tothe 21st century. There were two innovations in

science at the turn of this century, from the 19th tothe 20th century. The one is discovery of quanta byMax Plank in 1900. The second is the specialrelativity proposed by A. Einstein. And the 20thcentury has been the age of quantum mechanics andrelativity. However, the 20th century science began toreveal serious difficulties since early 1970. In particlephysics, proton decay experiments to validate grandunification theory (GUT) has been unsuccessful andmissing neutrino problem in solar energy has not yetbeen solved. Furthermore, high temperaturesuper-conducting phenomenon in ceramic material,cold fusion in an electrochemical reaction, andN-machine are unable to be understood by theparadigm of present natural science since the 17stcentury. Adding to these, metal bending, mind-overmatter phenomenon, has been confirmed scientificallyand the intrinsic limitations of the mass-energy naturalscience manifested itself. I think a key-word of thescientific revolution which humanity is nowexperiencing is "consciousness" (Ki, spirit), which wasneglected at the onset of the present natural sciencein the 17st century. The problem to incorporate"consciousness ingredient" into present science wasdiscussed at the 1st Int. Symposium onConsciousness, New Medicine and New Energy, andit was also discussed in the second symposium lastautumn.

And it resulted in the radical shift of our scientificworld view and scientific paradigm. It is reallydeserved to be called as the second Copernicanrevolution. How does the shift influence on theexisting science? First, as to relativity, it has theaspect, by the mathematical hypothesis of constancyof light speed, to expel non-material aether (Ki, spirit)which the 19th century physicists thought as themedium of EM propagation, and thereby securing themechanistic nature of Newtonian science. Therefore,it could not survive into the 21st century and its reignwould be limited within this century. Furthermore,according to the new scientific world view, thephysical world is not closed by itself, but is connectedto the shadow or consciousness world. This impliesthe possibility of violation of various conservation lawsin conventional physics; such as the law ofconservation of energy and that of angularmomentum. Thus, conventional physics may notsurvive.

Humanity may have a prospect of brand new scientificworld view and paradigm in the new century to comeshortly.

NEW ENERGY NEWS 5


These computer generated shapes represent complexpatterns of oscillating electrons formed by the intenseelectromagnetic fields from a laser beam. Researchersobserved that the electrons scattered radiation with wave-lengths that were harmonically related to the original beam.(Courtesy U. of Mich.)

LIGHT MAY SLOW DOWNCourtesy of Remy Chevalier

Roger Highfield, (Science Editor), “Scientists putbrakes on light,” The Electronic Telegraph, issue1364, Thursday, 18 February 1999.

Scientists have slowed light down..... way down,reported Dr Lene Hau of the Rowland Institute forScience, and Harvard University. By passing itthrough an illuminated atomic cloud, they have cut thespeed of a pulse of yellow laser light from 186,000miles per second to 0.01 mile per second and plan toreduce it further to a crawl of about half an inch asecond.

Because glass has a refractive index which is largerthan that of free space,.light is already known to slowdown a little when it enters a piece of glass. Quotedfrom the magazine: “Dr Hau said: "We are using amuch more interesting mechanism to slow light downby a factor of 20 million." The trick is to use onelightbeam to alter the refractive index of an unusualmedium - a cloud of sodium atoms cooled to ultra-lowtemperature known as a "Bose-Einstein condensate"- in such a way that it can slow down a second pulseof light. The trick has a number of applications, Dr.Hau said, such as converting infra-red light into bluelight. "In the future, this could be of importance forlaser light projectors -- it is hard to generate blue lightotherwise."

With a view toward future practicality and commercialapplications, such things are suggested as: convertinginfrared light to the visible spectrum easier, reducingnoise in communications, and creating light controllingswitches for the new optical computers. Dr. Hausaid: "These possible applications are, of course, forthe future -- perhaps 10 years down the line if we getto work on it. Right now we have an experimentalset-up where we are pushing technology to theoutermost limit. We'll have to figure out how to makethis into a practical instrument."

THOMPSON SCATTERINGCourtesy of Chuck Bennett

Daniel C. McCarthy, "Thomson Scattering MadeRelative," Photonics Spectra, March 1999.

EDITOR'S REVIEW

Physicists at the U. of Michigan Center for UltrafastOptical Science have used an ultra-fast pulsing laser

to pick up and drive electrons. Based on "relativisticThomson scattering", the researches were able todeduce the patterns of motion made by the oscillatingelectrons. See a scanned copy of the picture from thearticle. Note that the pattern on the upper right is thesame pattern that Dr. Jin has computed as being astable pattern for a high-density, charge-cluster ofelectrons - a toroid shape.

COMING - TAPPING ZPE?Courtesy of John Allan

Bernard Leitaer (formerly with the central bank inBelgium), "Awakening the Goddess," Living Lightlywith Positive News, issue 7, Spring 1999, pp 8-9.

EDITOR'S SUMMARY

Leitaer cites three waves that are pending: shift inmoney, burgeoning information, and zero-pointenergy. Leitaer cites the energy wave as being on thehorizon and not yet perceived by the media. So true!His definition of knowledge is information that hasbeen digested, integrated, and used by the personwho has been exposed to information. That is a gooddefinition. The article correctly states that zero-pointenergy (ZPE) comes from space itself. Incorrectly,due to lack of information, the article states:"Mainstreaming this energy may take awhile, and thisprocess, this wave of nw energy is still below the level

6 MAY 1999


of the horizon." Maybe in England, but not in Utah orCalifornia. Of the information wave, the internet,Lietear writes, "...produced by the Pentagon as aresult of the Cold War. ... It is the technological andevolutionary tool to bring us to unity beyond diversity.If you believe the information revolution is a big thing,wait until you see the monetary revolution. ... In fact,money is not a thing -- it is an agreement. It lives inthe same space as political parties, as gender, asmarriage." In an unusual insight into our changingworld, Leitaer tells us that a recent survey in Americanfound that about one quarter of society no longeraccepts the media's paradigm or value system."These people are aware that things have to change-- that inner work is necessary as well as outer work.In the Western world alone it is estimated that thereare over one hundred million people who recognizethis [new paradigm].

TESLA SOCIETY - HARD TIMESCourtesy of Roy Stewart

The International Tesla Society, Inc. has fallen onhard times and has taken out bankruptcy. We regretthat this society has not managed to survive. It isrumored that someone else will try to pick up thepieces and reorganize the Tesla Society.

THE OIL GLUTCourtesy Dr. Win Lambertson

Staff, "Drowning in oil," The Economist, March 6,1999, pp 19-22.

EDITOR'S SUMMARY AND COMMENTS

This article came just after gasoline prices have risenby ten cent per gallon at the pump during the pastweek. However, an oil glut may become a real issue,not because the oil-producing and exporting countries(OPEC) are producing too much oil, but hopefully,because we have better new-energy systems in use.Then the oil can be saved for future use as chemicalfeedstocks to make the thousands of products that weuse every year from petrochemicals. Don't burn it,conserve it for future generations.

Therefore, the future impact of new-energy devicecommercialization (which now has begun) will besome economic disasters for some nations such asIraq, Iran, Nigeria, Saudia Arabia, etc. Some of themembers of the upper class in these countries mayhave to go to work for a living. The good news is that

the non-OPEC nations, especially those that producelittle or no oil, will be able to have new-energysources.

MONEY CHANGINGCourtesy of John Allan

Richard Douthwaite, "The Ecology of Money," LivingLightly with Positive News, issue 7, Spring 1999, pp10-12.

EDITOR'S REVIEW

This article updates the biblical injunction that "thelove of money is the root of all evil." The authorstates, "Ninety-seven percent of all the money thatgets into circulation is created by the banking system- it doesn't come from the government at all. ... Sixtypercent of the money in circulation in this country (UK)is only there because people have taken outmortgages." The most interesting part of the article isthe discussion of Local Exchange Trading Systems(LETS). Here are some interesting quotes: "So anessential part of building sustainable communities isthat they must have their own money system. LETSdoes take a step toward this..." About experimentalcurrency systems: "One of these, and the one I ammost closely connected with, is in rural Ireland."About another currency system in the UK: "...it isbeing launched by Rural Forum Scotland and willcover about half of the rural area of Scotland."Finally: "The way I see the future developing is thatwe conceive of a sustainable world, not being

NEW ENERGY NEWS 7


Articles

produced by a One World International Agreement ...There will be a myriad of micro-economies which haveadjusted their systems of production and developedcultures so that they can live within the limits of theirown place. Each of these regions will have its owncurrency, yet there will also be multi-nationalcurrencies like the Euro, and there will probably be aworld currency too." The author extols the virtues ofmany LETSystems. Maybe we should start or join onefor the coming turn of the century problems.

THE DYNAMICS OF NEUTRINOSBy Chuck BennettPresident, Space Ventures, Sacramento, CA

This monograph is a continuation in a series ofarticles [1-4] dedicated to the creation of a unifiedtheory that encompasses the known forces of nature.A postulate has been established that neutrinospossessing mass pervade the universe thus creatinga "luminiferous medium." A foundation for thedynamics of the neutrino medium is presented herein.The mass energy equation can be interpreted as astatement that mass is comprised of a condensedneutrino group. Therefore, energy propagation asevaporated mass can be re-written in terms of adifferential rate. The equation, E = mc 2, isdifferentiated with respect to radial distance, r. Therate of electromagnetic energy propagation outward isinversely proportional to the rate of mass gradientinward. The proportionality constant is the speed oflight squared. Thus the gravitation equation isexpressed by the following equation:

dE/dr = - dm/dr c 2

The above expression summarizes how gravitation iscaused by electromagnetic gradients radiating

outward from a large body. Gravity and light energyare one in the same by an inverse relation and aproportionality constant, c2. As light energy radiatesoutward, a bias in the mass-energy field is establishedacross all spectrums of light energy. The effect isamplified by the power of mass energy. Thegravitation effect is subtle, but very little is needed tomove mass when the amplification factor is c2. Notethat the gradient, dE/dr, has the units of force due tothe definition of energy as force times distance. Alsonote that dm/dr is a mass gradient and this describesthe gravitational field.

Then gravity may be described as "an æther wind ofneutrinos." This establishes gravitation as an ongoing and continuous condensation of the neutrinomedium. Michelson and Morley would havedemonstrated a wavelength shift if one of the arms ofthe interferometer had been pointed straight up. Andthis has indeed been proven in terms of the so calledred or blue shift of photons traveling towards or awayfrom the earth's center along a gravitational vector.

Einstein's equivalence principle is another statementthat gravity is the "neutrino æther wind." Free fall ismore inertial than fixed at the earth's surface becausein free fall, objects appear to be weightless. Anaccelerometer that has not been reset to zero at thefixed state (a pure accelerometer) will read zero infree fall and will read one g fixed at the earth'ssurface. This means that objects fixed at the surfaceof the earth are equivalent to having an accelerationof one g and when in free fall, there are nocompressive forces. This is typically explained by theso called body force of gravity that acts on each andevery point with equal force so that in free fall there isno registration of compressive force.

In free fall, there is no force because free fall is theprocess of the neutrino æther accelerating inward atone g. In other words, the neutrino æther is inertialspace and to be fixed against an acceleration of theneutrino æther, is to be fixed against the accelerationof inertial space. Spin arrests the action of gravityand causes mass to stabilize in an orbit or an actionthat resembles gravitational repulsion. Since heat isa form of spinning mass, the negation of gravity maybe possible with a contained thermal gradient that hasa very large magnitude of gradient and is opposite thegravitational field.

The above approach introduces the view of a"Bernoulli effect" on all types of fundamental particles.When a particle flows past another particle in a closetangential flyby, a void is created. Then the firstparticle begins to fill the void. The principle

"There is no room in good science forchallenging the known Physics ofTheoretical Laws. Far too manymortgages are involved."

-- Attributed to Nicholas Copernicus.

8 MAY 1999


of void filling is a fundamental law of nature. This iswhy the vortex feeds on itself to get stronger andstronger with increasing tangential velocity towardsthe center until a threshold is reached and matter orneutrino æther goes out through the top and/or bottomof the vortex center "eye."

But this is the Bernoulli "void filling" principle in action.The inward acceleration of inertial space is asecondary outcome of the flyby tangential effect thatmanifests as gravity. This provides a view that doesnot have to treat the neutrino æther as having finitecompressibility. The neutrino æther conforms to fitthe manifestation of the natural realm in a way thatexplains the effects observed.

Further reasoning can be applied to explain the other3 forces of nature. The various forces are simply dueto the Bernoulli flyby void filling effect at differentproximaties with different constants of magnitude.Gravitation is due to the tangential action ofelectromagnetic gradients that permeate all bodiesand pull items inward described fundamentally byNewton's laws.

The strong force is a similar action at a hypermagnified level. The electron is a spherical vortexthat is tumbling through space. Attraction cannot bedistinguished from repulsion because the tumblingcareening action of the flyby will look like a repulsionwhen two electrons attract each other and result in a"powered" flyby. A positron and electron attractbecause a positron is a reverse flow spherical vortexso there is always superposition of attraction for allpoints in the merger of the two flow fields.

The proton attracts an electron because the proton ismore stationary and stable and can anchor theBernoulli void filling effect to cause the electron tohave a stable orbit. The other forces of nature aremerely the same effect on a different scaling basis.This gives a universal theory born from the neutrinoæther. Classical mechanics with waves, forces,collisions, etc., are outcomes of the basic action.Waves result when streams of particles grouptogether and travel according to the motion templateof a helieal spiral pattern that links the action of theparticle to a sinusoidal wave as seen from the sideview. Thus the neutrino æther possesses a highdegree of orthogonality.

In conclusion, the neutrino æther will conform to makeall known phenomena exist in a way that provides thelaws of nature. Many new variations of a resurrectedæther have recently been proposed. The conceptspresented herein are just another

addition to the ongoing effort to reestablish aworkable æther with the neutrino of finite mass as thebasic building block of the æther.

Previous Articles:1. C. Bennett, "The Luminiferous Medium as a Sea

of Neutrinos," J. New Energy, Summer/Fall, 1998,vol 3., No. 2/3, pp. 30-32.

2. C. Bennett, "A Quantized Æther", New EnergyNews, November, 1996, vol 4, no 7, p.7.

3. C. Bennett, "Einstein's Mass Dilation as ÆtherDrag", J. New Energy, Spring, 1997, vol 2, no I,pp. 74-76.

4. C. Bennett, "Light is the Ghost of Mass," NewEnergy News, Vol. 5, No. 2, June 1997, pp. 8-9.

NUCLEOVOLTAIC CELLCourtesy of Pat Bailey

David Moon asked me to send you this. A drawing isattached. A new approach to obtaining energy fromthe cold fusion reactions, by converting the energydirectly to electricity, was disclosed in an article, "TheNucleo-Electric Effect" (Infinite Energy , number13-14).

Following is a more detailed description of one celldesign based on this concept.

Cell Design

Strong Pressure vessel (1) contains H 2 or D2 gas.P-type semiconductor (2) has NP junction (3) with N- type semiconductor (4) that has been coated with athin film of hydrogen -active metal (eg. Pd, Ni or Ti).Electrical contacts (5) connect the semiconductors toan external circuit (6) as well as to a rechargeablebattery or energizer (7), in series with two large ohmresistors (8,81), which provide a forward - biasedvoltage across the NP junction greater than thecontact potential set up in the reverse direction (P toN) . Hydrogen or deuterium gas is admitted to theevacuated vessel through valve (9). Pressure isabove atmospheric, optimum pressure beingdetermined by experiment. Hydrogen nuclei absorbedinto the interface between the metallic film andsurface of the N-type semiconductor react to driveexcess electrons across the junction to the P side andout to the external circuit. PN-type rectifiers (10-13) inthe circuits assure flow of electrons as indicated.These are heavily - doped tunnel diodes having lesselectr ical res istance than other impur i tysemiconductors.

NEW ENERGY NEWS 9


Operation of cell

The rechargeable battery or energizer (7) applies avoltage to the PN junction contrary to the equilibriumcontact potential set up at the junction. A diffusion ofelectrons from N to P across the junction begins, butresistor (8) is designed to limit the rate of discharge ofthe battery (7) . If the external circuit (6) is closed, itmay also contribute slightly to the current beingapplied. Absorption of sufficient H or D into the N -type semiconductor will, according to the "swimmingelectron layer" (SEL) theory (Miley, Hora), result innuclear fusions or transmutations. It is proposed herethat the nuclear energy released will excite electronsin the semiconductor from the valence band into theconduction band, at a worthwhile efficiency, thusgenerating an excess electrical potential. Initially, thecurrent flows entirely through the external circuit (6).

When the generated current reaches the energy, suchthat the potential at C exceeds the potential at A, thensome current (e- ) will flow from C to A. At point A,electrons have two possible pathways: from A to N toP to B, or from A thru (7) to B. The latter is the"recharging cycle" for the battery and should occurwhen the internal resistance of the battery (7) acrossAB, designated r7, is less than the total resistancefrom A to N to P to B. That is, when r7 << R8 + R11 +RNP + R81. The selection of resistors (8

and 81) must give enough ohms to steer the electronflow from A to B thru energizer (7) when V (at C)exceeds V (at A), in order to recharge the battery (7)during normal cell operation.

Current from the cell divides at C during normaloutput. To be a useful source of d.c. electricity, mostof the electron flow from C to D will go through theexternal circuit (6). Therefore the total resistance fromC to D passing through the battery (7), which is R13 +r7 + R12, will be considerably greater than theexternal resistance, R6 + R10, yet will allow forrecharging. Further, to prevent the loss of electricalenergy from P to B to D during operation, R81 + R 12>>R6 + R10. If it happens that reactions in the N -type semiconductor fall below the minimumoperational level, then V (at C) becomes less than V(at A), and battery (7) reenergizes the cell.

Choosing the correct components for thisnucleo-electric cell, including the proper ohm resistors(8 and 81), can lead to a reliable*, rugged,self-sustaining and long-lasting source of directcurrent for many applications.

*Note : tests may prove individual cells producevarying d.c., but that cells in combination generate anacceptably steady current.

David Moon Minneapolis, MN, USA, September 18,1998

KNOWLEDGE KNOWS NO BORDERSAND NO LIMITS.

The title is inspired by the mission statement of theS lovak ia -based company ca l l ed INTER-ENERGORESURS, a knowledge-intensive enterprisehaving as primary source of revenues licensingagreements for its really earth-shaking and newbreakthrough technologies.

The high quality of the portfolio of licenses of thecompany is based on the collaboration with front-linescientists and inventors from Russia and EasternEurope, places which temporarily are lacking fundsbut have plenty of resources of first class little graycells. Beyond its 17- letters name, suggesting that it isfocusing on "international energy resources", attestedby the three "generations" of YUSMAR devices whichare world leaders in energy saving, the companyoffers unique, genuine technological 'gems' as:

10 MAY 1999


-- an INDUSTRIAL process for production offullerenes, the very first worldwide- an openingtoward thousands of high-tech applications;-- a handy, on-the-site, process for "highly reactivehydrocarbon mixtures," a stuff with unmatchedefficiency for oil spill removal;-- a hyper-efficient filler for rubber and plastics;-- innovative processes for esthetically and opticallyperfect high-temperature monocrystals and ceramics;-- processes for the manufacture of rare-earth metalsand for isotopes of osmium;-- an invincible method for the protection ofdocuments, banknotes, credit-cards etc. againstcounterfeiting by using the isotope osmium-187 asmarker.-- a device for waste-water treatment, YUSMAR-PP-BIO, highly efficient and with a broad range ofapplicability.-- vortex type air coolers/heaters with the best workingparameters and performances worldwide.

All this licenses are fully backed and supported bypatents, know-how reports, international certificationsand, last but not least by the prestige of the inventors.

And this is only the start. The company, whichhopefully will get a short acronym and brand-name,IER, (shortness of name is a sign of greatness) wasfounded in November 1997 by Mikhail Pavlovskiy,entrepreneur from Ukraine who is the generalmanager of IER. His primary motivation and the raisond'etre of the company is ecological awareness andcare, pollution being a chronical problem for ourgeneration and especially troubling and acute forIER's geographical area.

In Pavlovskiy's vision, the primary task is to reducesignificantly the consumption of fuels of all kind, solid,liquid gaseous; he dreams about a fuel-less Terrasometime in the 21 st century.

His associate and close friend, coming from theMoldova Republic, Dr. Yuri S. Potapov is inventoremeritus of his country, member of the Russian andUkrainian academies, owner of the US award "Torchof Birmingham", an Edison of our age. Potapov'sYUSMAR machines generate heat and electric powerfrom water. The newest devices are workingcompletely autonomously. These claims can beverified at the sites, IER Company in RimavskaSubota and YUSMAR Company in Kishinev.

Other consultants/associates/supporters of thecompany are:

Ilya Varshavski, the renowned inventor of rocketengines, of hydrogen based engines with closedloops, founder of the scientific field called "energy-accumulating substances", president of the "AlbertEinstein" International Academy for Energetics,leading member of the Russian Academy.

Henry Gelperin, member of the Russian Committeefor Environmental Protection, member of the RussianAcademy, of the International Academy for Natureand Society, the academies of cosmonautics, ofnoosphere etc., etc.;

D. F . Baziev, Ph. D., member of the RussianAcademy of Natural Sciences;

Lev G. Sapogin, professor, founder of the "unitaryquantum theory";

Peter Gluck, Ph. D., from the Institute of Isotopic andMolecular Technology, Cluj-Napoca, Romania,professor of management of technology and ofecological energetics, pioneer of the consultingactivity in his country.

This gives an image of the tacit knowledge supportingIER. As for the explicit knowledge, this can beevaluated on the basis of a collection of over 400patents collected and owned by the company.

The company's strategy is based on the firm beliefthat all the citizen's of Earth are entitled to a cleanenvironment and to energetical prosperity. ThereforeIER is ready to start discussions about selling licensesand patent rights to all the interested parties. Thecompany thinks that in this new world,communication beyond geography and collaborationbeyond history is indeed possible.*********The coordinates of the company:

INTERENERGORESURS97901 Rimavska Subotaul. Fucikova, SLOVAKIA

Tel: 0042 1866 5631432Tel/Fax : 0042 1866 5631144Mobile : 0042 1903 8033222E-mail: [email protected] in construction!

NEW ENERGY NEWS 11


THE PARAMETERS OF THE UNIVERSEBy Bert Schreiber (Bellaire, TX)

BRIEF REVIEW

A short review will be undertaken to refresh thereaders minds. Every Mass acts as if its entire Forceis concentrated at its exact center of Mass.Therefore, every Mass acts as if it was at the center ofthe Universe. That ended the SEP. There is thatMarmet Equation which now permits all theparameters of the smallest Universe, whichtheoretically can exist, up to our Universe, and thenceto the maximum limit to be calculated. [previousarticle NEN, Jan 1999]

There needs but to study (19-8) a bit. Setting Mass ofUniverse, MU to the left side, then there is on the rightside, the value which gives its radius. It is importantto note that the calculation gives the R to anotheridentical M, so that they can be theoretically, or willbe in reality, attracted to one another, resulting in theacceleration of same, whether or not one is fixed andthe other can move, or both can move. From that MU

calculation of r, then its diameter, and from that itsspherical Volume, and from the Volume and Mass, theMass density of same.

TABLE 5 gives all of the parameters, from thesmallest to the largest possible Universe includingours, 8. Specific discussion will follow as to this table.Excluding any values with <, all answers arestipulated to be extended. 15 billion light years =1.419 x 1028 cm. r in cm, Mass in gm, density isgm/cm3 and Volume is cm3.

The values can be found and/or double checked fromtheir ratio relationships. It is possible to extend TABLE5 up or down, between limits, by finding the

ratios between any two, and using same, to find orverify, the other values. The ratios for r and densityare linear. Using either then, Mass is (d1 : d2)2 and forVolume (r1 : r2)

3. As an example: To find M at limit, M9,determine ratio of 6. to 9. for density which is:

R = 5 < x 10-7 : 7.407 x 10-48 = 6.75 < x 1040 which isalso = radius.M9. = M6. x R2 = 2 < x 10 -6 x 45.5625 x 1080 = 9.1125 <x 1075

Note Mass in 9. whose numerical value is one-half of1822.5 (911.25 x 1073).

How close does the effective Gravitational radiuscompare with the neutrino and the proton?

DEFINING THE ENERGY MARKETWingate A. Lambertson, Ph.D.March 21, 1999

INTRODUCTION

When Hal Fox published a comparison of energyproductivity with four other categories (New EnergyNews, Vol. 6, No. 7, January, 1999), I asked Fox whatthe energy industry consisted of, when described interms of productivity. He responded that he had someof the same questions. This led me to do a littledigging and the following paper .

My primary source was Statistical Abstract of theUnited States - 1996. Types of fuel categorize theindustry. Consumption in the United States in 1994was:

Fuel type Quadrillion Btu/yearPetroleum products 34.7Natural gas 21.2

TABLE 5

RADIUS MASS DENSITY VOLUME1. 1.924500 X 10-21 7.407407 x 10-48 2.48097 x 1014 2.985678 x 10-62

2. 1.333333 x 10 -13 3.555555 x 10 -32 3.75 < x 106 9.481481 x 10-39

3. 2.138334 x 10 -11 9.144947 x 10-28 2.338269 x 104 3.910990 x 10-32

4. 9.928090 x 10 -10 1.666666 x 1- -24 5.212169 x 102 3.197645 x 10-27

5. 1.291348 x 10 -9 3.335162 x 10-24 3.097537 x 102 1.076714 x 10-26

6. 1 2 < 10-6 5 < x 10-7 4 <7. 7.071067 x 102 1 6.653142 x 10-10 1.414213 x 109

Current :8. 15BLY* 4.027122 x 1050 3.523608 x 10-35 1.142897 x 1085

9. 6.75 < x 1040 9.1125 < x 1075 7.407407 x 10-48 1.123018 x 10123

* Billion Light Years

12 MAY 1999


Coal 19.5Nuclear electric power 6.3Renewable energy

Hydroelectric power 3.1Geothermal 0.3Biofuels 2.8

Electric power generation converts basic fuels intoelectric power and is categorized separately. For thepurpose of this paper, it is included in the abovecategories. Electric power is used in zero-pointenergy collection so the fuel or energy source and thechanging into useful electric power cannot beseparated.

GLOBAL ENERGY OUTLOOK published by Moody'sWorld Energy Group, in their February, 1999 issue,forecast that by 2020 the world will consume threetimes as much energy as in 1970. In that year, theworld's energy consumption was 1,359.3 quadrillionBtu. Assuming that the Global projection is the bestavailable, the world's energy requirement will be 4,078quadrillion Btu. That is the target for zero-pointenergy.

The common unit of measurement in the abovecategories is the Btu, the British thermal unit. OneBtu is needed to raise one pound of water one degreeFahrenheit at 39.2 degrees F. One quadrillion is 1015

or 1,000 trillion. In oil terms, there are 5.8 million Btuin a barrel. In electricity terms, there are 10,272 Btuper kilowatt-hour. In coal terms, there are 21.278million Btu per long ton. Nuclear power requires20,914 Btu per kilowatt-hour.

Energy companies are based primarily on petroleum.During the 1970s oil crisis, some oil companiesdiversified into coal and chemicals and calledthemselves energy companies. The Global articletells us that Royal Dutch Shell and British Petroleumsee themselves as energy companies and are pouringmillions of dollars into solar manufacturing facilities.On the surface, movement into renewable energy iscommendable. However, it appears to be a delayingaction to protect their investment in fossil fuels. In1994 the photovoltaic component of our energyconsumption was too small to be even listed.

Zero-Point Energy Role

The only new energy sources that have the potentialto meet the world's energy needs are cold fusion andzero-point energy. Nuclear energy is both expensiveand politically unacceptable. Zero-point energy isabout 10 years behind cold fusion in its developmentbut is inherently less expensive and capable of beingscaled up rapidly. It not only is capable of electric

power production but will be used in all the fossil fuelmarkets, except chemicals. It will be possible tocompletely saturate the energy market by 2020 and atleast one organization has plans to do just that.

Funding Potential

Global lists nine economic sectors in terms of profit.Of those nine, energy was third from the bottom at$3.72 billion in the fourth quarter of 1998. If you takeout electric companies, the profit was only $1,633billion. In 1994 on revenues of $446.6 billion, theoperating income was $30.1 billion at 3.7 percent.The technology sector was $17.08 billion. As pointsof comparison, in 1995 Intel had sales of $16.2 billionwith a net income of $3,556 billion. Microsoft hadsales of $5,937 billion with a net income of $1,453billion or 24.5 percent.

The collection of zero-point energy and conversioninto electric power or other fossil fuel applications is ahigh technology activity and will justify a hightechnology rate of return on investment or a 50percent gross profit, for example. The relatively highrate of return will attract investors from all over theworld.

Hal Fox estimated the cost of new energy as one thirdof present day energy costs. (Private communication)At that rate, it will replace all fossil, nuclear andrenewable energy sources. Even the Columbia Rivermay go back to salmon production. Sales expenseswill be very low.

Order the book:

SUPERLUMINARY RELATIVITYRELATED TO NUCLEAR

FORCES AND STRUCTURES

Petar K. Anastasovski166 Pages, $28.50 plus postage

Order: Trenergy, Inc.3084 E. 3300 SouthSalt Lake City, Utah 84109

Phone: 801-466-8680 Fax: 801-466-8668

A N E W T H E O R YO F R E L A T I V I T Y

NEW ENERGY NEWS 13


OtherPublications

ENERGY CREATION RESEARCH

Dr. Lev Sapogin, Igor Kulikov (Moscow), “Proposal forTheoretical and Experimental Research on Creationof New Energy Sources and Reactive Engines(Green-Jet Project),” 40 refs, 10 figs.

INTRODUCTION

Our civilization would be impossible without sourcesof energy. Unfortunately our seemingly prosperouslife may be nearing its end. According to theevaluation of experts the present-day resources ofhydrocarbon fossil fuel will start to be exhausted by2025 and then the world will face a beginning of trueenergy crisis. Conceivably, conventional nuclearreactors might solve this problem, since the existingthorium and uranium deposits would last forthousands of years. Yet, from an ecological view-point the current varieties of classic nuclear-fissionreactors are “delayed-action mines” threateningmankind by periodic Chernobyl-type disasters.

For the entire report visit:http://www.erols.com/sturartjr/Ganzproj.html

MORE ANOMALIES

Roger Taylor, “Some Attempts to ReproduceAnomalous Phenomena,” newsletter of the USPsychotronic Association, 12/27/94, 7 refs, 1 fig.

ABSTRACT

For the past 10 years I have been intensely interestedin scientific aspects of subtle energy -- and indeed inall kinds of “fringe science.” My aim has been to helpbring at least some aspects of subtle energy out intothe light of objectivity. Nothing would please me morethan to be able to demonstrate some phenomenonwhich would defy conventional explanation. Thus Ihave, over the years, tried to repeat several publishedclaims to demonstrate such phenomena. In some Ihave failed to find the phenomenon -- often due toinsufficient technical details being provided. In others,where I have reproduced the phenomena (to mysatisfaction at least) it has seemed to me that theywere accountable by simple conventionalexplanations. It is difficult enough in this area topublish in any detail even positive results, and moredifficult if they are negative. Thus I limit myself to aqualitative account of my experiences in each of fourtypes of experiment.

WIRED FOR COLD FUSIONCourtesy of Pat Bailey

What If Cold Fusion Is Real? - Wired magazineArticle, Nov. 1998 by Charles Platt, Wired

The full text of the really great review on Cold Fusionfrom the Wired magazine article, Nov. 1998, is now at:<http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/ 6.11/coldfusion.html> and is 11 pages long,for easy printing (hint!).

Dr. Eugene Mallove said last October: "It is one of thevery best general media accounts of cold fusion todate. Charles Platt is to be congratulated for hisexcellent treatment."

THE COSMIC LIGHTCourtesy of Dr. Timothy Binder

On May 2, 1999, the University of Science &Philosophy celebrates the 50th anniversary of TheWalter Russell Foundation. As a part of thatanniversary, a new publication, The Cosmic Light, aquarterly magazine of the University of Science &Philosophy begins with volume one, number one,January 1999 issue. The cost of this quarterly is $20per year. Write to Swannanoa, P.O. Box 520,Waynesboro, VA 22980.

Dr. Timothy Binder has long been a supporter ofnew-energy science. Currently, he and Toby Grotzare working on new-energy research. Dr. Binder isDirector of Research for the University of Science &Philosophy.

FUTURE TECHNOLOGY INTELLIGENCE REPORT,MARCH 1999vol 10, no 3 excerptsCourtesy of Dr. Antony C. Sutton

This issue of Future Technology Intelligence Reporthas the following articles:

"Quiet Please, Bureaucrats Asleep -- Since March1989". The article describes the contents of the DOEcold fusion information on its website and includes thefollowing reponse from a DOE representative: "...stillreflects our considered opinion on cold fusion. Wehave no plans to update the Web site in the nearfuture."

14 MAY 1999


"Department of Agriculture Awakened by Reality".The article reports that the Dept of Ag includedirradiation, genetic engineering, sewage sludge, andchemical sprays as allowable for organic farming.280,000 farms, marketers, and consumers objected.The DOA had to retract. Perhaps the new-energycommunity can do the same for DOE.

"State Department holds First InternationalConference on Free Energy".

FTIR - APRIL 1999 , vol 10, no 4

“US State Department and Free Energy”(exerpts)“....... We have had personal experience ofGovernment abuses, sitting across the table fromGovernment people pressuring us to withdraw aprivate book from circulation. When we refused wewere arbitrarily ejected from a Stanford Fellowship.This is another side of the political sickness describedby Paulo Correa and not uncommon.......

We do not speak for the Free Energy Community.However we sense a widespread vision of a free,voluntary world with the least possible Governmentinterference and promoting honesty in science.

The Impact of Free Energy

....... Reduce dependence on Middle East oil andnatural gas and you reduce the significance of theMiddle East as a political "national interest". This hasmajor military, foreign policy and fiscal implications.This reduces the political influence of oil firms. Wecan then reduce military expenditures. Less oil, lesspolitics, less instability.

Russia gets 60% of foreign exchange from oil andgas, and is already strapped. Free energy is positivefor the emerging freedom forces in Russia andencourages private initiative because free energycurbs the expansionist imperialist forces fueled by oil.LENR technology can speed programs for eliminationof nuclear weapons...... another instability headache,

.... This is private business by private citizens, payingtheir own expenses with no government subsidy, lawabiding, peaceful and constructive. There is no needfor regulation, there is nothing to regulate.

Ah! The knowledge, that’s the key.......

Who has the knowledge? A retired Tufts chemicalengineering professor, a fired Press Officer from MIT,a bought out researcher from Los Alamos NationalLaboratory, a Naval Research Laboratory researcher

and scores of others in this category...talented hardworkers not interested in politics and academicgames..

.... Free Energy is not a monopoly, not polluting,cannot be used to destroy or control, doesn’t usescarce resources or tear up the environment.. Itneeds a free competitive structure for development.”

FTIR offers two-year subscription to its monthlypublication plus a copy of Dr. Sutton's book, ColdFusion; Secret Energy Revolution for $120. Respondto FTIR, PO Bx 2903, Sacramento, CA 95812.

FROM GLOBAL ENERGY OUTLOOKCourtesy of Gordon B. Moody

The following is a quote from Gordon Moody'seditorial in the February 1999 issue of Global EnergyOutlook:

"While the administration likes to take credit forthe booming U.S. economy, increased productivityresulting from technology and low energy costs arethe factors keeping inflation and interest rates at theirlowest level in more than a decade. Unfortunately,neither the politicians nor the American Publicrecognize that the oil and gas industry cannotcontinue to provide low cost energy if they are losingbillions of dollars." [It must take some real 'spin-doctoring' for certain groups to claim that the big oilindustry is or has-been destroying the emergence ofnew-energy products. Ed.]

In this same issue of Global Energy Outlook are thefollowing extracted tidbits: The U.S. daily oil production is down (1998compared with 1997) by 165,030 bbls per day. U.S. tax rates are higher than anytime in thiscentury except 1944 (during WW II).The major oil companies had profit declines during1998 4th Qtr. by 91 percent. The energy sectorexperienced losses of billions of dollars. Federal taxes are 20.7 of entire economy now,compared to 19% during Korean War and 20.9%when the U.S. was fighting both Germany and Japan. Between 1970 and 1980 the U.S. economyincreased 122.4% while energy consumption hasincreased only 35.9%. Currently, the U.S. consumes92.9 quadrillion BTUs (est. for 1999, an increase of1.7% from 1998). Oil and natural gas provide 2.3rds of U.S. energyand coal provides almost 1/4th. U.S. major oil companies denied entry into SaudiOil business. [That's good, the oil companies need toinvest in new-energy projects. Ed.]

NEW ENERGY NEWS 15


The seepage of oil from ocean-under-seabedsources is 100 times as much oil as comes fromoffshore oil exploration. The biggest threat to oil prices stems from thepolitical unrest in the Middle East. By 2020, the world will consume three times asmuch energy as it did in 1970. U.S. gross domestic product grew 5.6% in 4th Qtr.of 1998. The smallest category is Basic Materials at$2.4 billion; Energy at $3.7 billion, and the topFinancial Services at $22.36 billion.

EDITORIALGordon B. Moody (Publisher / Editor) Global EnergyOutlook, March 1999, vol 4, no 3.

The U.S. economy continues to surge upward.American consumers are spending nearly 100% oftheir after-tax incomes as if there were no tomorrow.With nothing left to spend, they are borrowing on theinflated values of their stocks. The U.S. trade deficitis at the highest level in history. All of the movementappears to be in one direction. Asia depends uponU.S. imports to consume 25% of its exports. WithLatin America, the U.S. must import two-thirds of itsexport to keep them solvent. All of the forecasts callfor the U.S. economy to continue its upward spiral, butthat calls for American consumers to spend morewhen there’s little left to spend. In 1992, Americanssaved 5.7% of their income. Today, all savings arerolled-up into inflated stock prices. Robert J.Samuelson, noted economist, says the U.S. economymay be surfing in its own euphoria. Overpriced stockscause consumers to overspend and businesses tooverinvest. Sooner or later, the process will chokeon itself. The after shocks worldwide will bedisastrous.

SPACE ENERGY JOURNALCourtesy Don Kelly

This quarterly journal specializes in energy-relateddevices. The latest issue: volume X, issue 1, March1999, has the following articles of interest tonew-energy readers:

"The Gravity-Magnetic Wheel/Motor, Type II." Thisarticle discusses theoretical and experimental workwith using masses that are on the periphery on thedown motion of the wheel and move toward the axleon the up motion side. The interesting addition is theuse of magnets to help reposition the masses near thebottom of the wheel. "1998 Report on the Win Method," by WingateLambertson. This is a short history of the times andproblems of the E-dam cermet device that recent datashows a yield of 145 percent.

"Free Energy Device (USA)." reprinted from Dec.1998 issue of The Leading Edge InternationalResearch Journal - #117. The article claims that aTom Bearden, Zero Point Electrical Generator (ZPEG)has been built, kept secret, and "We have not paid anelectrical bill since 1993."Book Review of Secrets of Cold Wr Technology:Project HAARP and Beyond, by Gerry Vassilkatos.The review by Pat Bailey says "Get This Book!NOW!! "The Newman's Energy Machine." by J L Naudinand M. David. This report claims a mechanicalefficiency of 134%. The output measurement uses apony brake. In input measurements use ahigh-frequency oscilloscope.

For further information contact Space EnergyAssociation, PO Box 1136, Clearwater, Florida,33757-1136 or call 954-749-6553.

CHAINS -- A BOOK REVIEWBy Hal Fox

James Bovard, FREEDOM IN CHAINS, The Rise ofthe State and the Demise of the Citizen, c1999, St.Martin's Press, 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, N.Y.10010, 326 pages, indexed, 1256 references.

Why should an energy newsletter review a book aboutthe constraints that the government imposes on itscitizens? The answer is simple: So you will be awareof what type of restraints will be placed on new-energydevices unless voters object. This well-researchedand impeccably-documented book, is a must read forany person who looks to new-energy systems toprovide him or her with additional freedom. I'llguarantee that you will not be so complacent aboutyour government for the rest of your life, and rightlyso.

The book reviews the basic rights which the foundersof this country insisted should be retained by thecitizens. The book also chronicles how these citizenrights have gradually been eroded until now even thehated name of a ruthless czar is coupled withgovernment institutions, such as a drug czar. Thisbook gives us many examples of how we haveallowed the government agencies (at all levels) toerode citizen rights and, in many cases, to enslaveand imprison citizens who failed to abide by unfair

Book Review

16 MAY 1999


government bureaucratic mandates. Here are someexamples:

"The average family with two earners paid nearly asmuch in taxes in 1998 as their total nominal earningsin 1980."Welfare: "In the six most generous states, benefitsexceed the entry-level salary for a computerprogrammer. The higher the benefits, the less workrecipients perform."Price Control: "Supreme Court Justice Owen Roberts... it is plain that this Act creates personal governmentby a petty tyrant instead of government by law."Superfund: The government has spent almost$1 billion for Superfund and forced private parties tospend up to another $80 billion. Yet the program hascleaned up barely a third of the most dangerouslandfills."Citizen Trust: "...a 1995 poll found that 76 percent ofAmericans say that they "rarely or never trustgovernment to do what is right."Rewarded by Fines: "...OSHA inspectors were beingrewarded on the basis of how many fines they issued."Stealing by IRS: "...IRS wrongfully collected up to $7billion in penalties...not owed by taxpayers. Thus,Americans probably lose more each year fromunjustified IRS payment demands than is stolen by allthe burglars and armed robbers combined."Price of Getting: "What have politicians given to thecitizenry that they did not originally take from them? ...In reality, ... politicians give back far less in value thanthey took."Sovereignty: "The challenge of our times is to limitthe power of government so that citizens can reclaimsovereignty over their own lives."

Many of the laws enacted by government are labeledwith such nice words as Environmental Protection,Fair Trade, and Comprehensive Employment andTraining Act ($40 billion spent, $0 results). Worse,the legislators think they are helping the people.However, by the time the bureaucrats write andpublish the regulations, the citizens who are supposedto be helped find that they can be arrested,imprisoned, and fined, with no rights to sue those whoimpose these serious coercions upon them.

So what has that to do with new energy? When coaluse decreases, when electric utilities cannot competewith new-energy devices, when oil refineries have toreduce production, when natural gas use is greatlyreduced, what do you think those industries are goingto ask from their Congresspersons? They will ask forfair trade, price controls, new-energy restrictions, andlegislation prohibiting new-energy systems. And whatwill the Congresspersons do? Unless a strong

voice from the people is registered, the will find waysto help maintain fairness for groups that donate largere-election funds.

What Should You Do? You must make your votecount. You must make your voice heard. You mustfill your Congressman's email file with strong,courteously-worded demands for the government tonot restrict the use of new-energy technology. Youhad better start now or find that the new-energydevices now being commercialized will be bound withgovernment regulations disguised as safety, fairness,consumer protection, etc.

Recently, the Department of Agriculture tried toexpand the definition of organic. Tens of thousandsof concerned citizens objected. The DOA withdrew!That is the answer to your freedom to use thenew-energy devices that are now beingcommercialized! To be forewarned is to beforearmed! Read this book, be informed, maintainyour energy rights. Then regain your many otherrights that are currently denied by bureaucraticregulations.

In the final chapter of this remarkable book, the authorsuggests some things that citizens should do. Hereare some further suggestions that should beaccomplished:

1. Require every government agency that is based onthe Constitutional concept of "promote the generalwelfare" to reduce its number of regulations by halfand the amount of fines by half. Repeat this mandateevery Congress or forgo any appropriations.

2. Remove the shield of sovreignty for all "generalwelfare" based agencies and allow the concernedcitizen to sue the government worker and haveimmediate access to an independent Arbitrator.

3. Require that only one government agency shall beallowed to write regulations for any particular topicsuch as Energy.

4. Pass legislation that all total government taxationcannot exceed 25% of a person's income.

5. Insist that someone in every Congressperson'soffice must read a new law before it is presented forvote.

Note: The editor invites you to suggest ways in whichgovernment excesses in the name of "generalwelfare" can be curtailed. First, read this book and bean informed citizen.

NEW ENERGY NEWS 17


END GOVERNMENT SECRECYCourtesy of Remy Chevalier

Danna A. Demac, Keeping America Un-Informed:Government Secrecy in the 1980s , ISBN0-8298-0721-7

Chapter 7 is titled, "Indirect Connection, ScientificInquiry and National Security." The following is fromthe introductory paragraph: "In this so-calledinformation age, scientific inquiry and technologicalinvention have become tools of political power. ... Thenew importance of the results of scientific researchhas intensified a fundamental controversy betweenthose who would restrict the flow of scientificinformation in the interest of national security andthose who would encourage that flow to ensureAmerican excellence in science and education." It isextraordinarily difficult to follow the logic of restrictingthe flow of information to ensure excellence ineducation!

The Two Basic Issues:1. The claim of the proponents of strict secrecy isthat the nation must control technological informationto ensure the country's technologic superiority. Strictlimits on sharing of scientific information were vital tonational security.2. The claim of the academic and scientific scholarsis that scientific superiority in the U.S. can only bemaintained by freedom to communicate scientificinformation.

This publisher's view is that the government must befree to classify (for short periods of time) detailedstructural information on military weapons. This viewincludes the right of government to classifyweapon-related research that is funded bygovernment military agencies. The governmentshould have no right to classify any type of researchand development discovered by individuals and/orfunded by corporate of private funds.

Free Energy:The Race to Zero Point

From Nikola Tesla to New Hydrogen Energy; PlasmaDischarge to T.Townsend Brown; Magnetic Motorsto Anti-Gravity... the Era of Unlimited Energy hasbegun!

A comprehensive 110-minute broadcast-qualitydocumentary featuring the most promising devices,processes and theories from brilliant visionaryscientists and the most persistent independentinventors on the planet!

Get late information on the history and latestrevolutionary developments from the following: TomBearden, Dennis Lee, Dave Porter, Dr. DennisCravens, Eugene Mallove, Troy Reed, Hal Fox,Jeane Manning, Roy Thornson, John Hutchison,Joseph Newman, Paramahamsa Tewari, Dr. ShiujiInomata, Moray King , Dr. Brian O'Leary, TomValone, Paul Pantone. Hosted by: Bill JenkinsWritten & Directed by: Christopher ToussaintProduced by: Harry DeLigter Distributed by:Lightworks Audio & Video Music by: Steve Gaines,Richard Burmer, Mark Swane

VHS HiFi $34.95 + $3.05 S&H = $38.00. Free shipping & handling for INE members.Order from: FIC, 3084 E. 3300 South, Salt Lake City, UT 84109

18 MAY 1999


Editorial

The Regulations:The Inventions and Secrecy Act of 1951 gave

defense agencies authority to review patentapplications to determine if they should be classified.This law has been used to classify a voice scramblerand a data-protection device. An attempt was madeto classify the discovery of high-density chargeclusters.

The Atomic Energy Act of 1954 relates to nuclearenergy research. Such research is "born classified"under this law. In 1979, this act was used to preventpublication of an article, "The H-Bomb: How We GotIt, Why We're Telling It." Later in 1981, the DOEattempted to use this law to prohibit any U.S.laboratory employees from corresponding withresearchers from Communist countries.

The Export Administration Act of 1979 allowsrestrictions on the export of anything deemed to beharmful to national security.

Finally, regulations were promulgated by overfifteen government agencies to control, oversee, orrestrict scientific activities.

The Result:It would be obvious to anyone who is experienced

in research and development, that these restrictionswould diminish the technological advances in anycountry in which this type of restraint on professionalcommunication was imposed. That has been theresult in the U.S. The editor of this magazine hastalked with scientists who have left the United Statesand gone to other countries to be able to continuetheir scientific research after their work had beenclassified. Consider the growth of the computer andthe internet technologies. What country would beahead of the U.S. if the in-the-garage work led to thefirst Apple Computer had been classified? The U.S.leads the world in new technology. Freedom ofcommunication is the essence of technologicaldevelopment. No government agency nor any civilservant should have any right to curtail privateinvention and discovery. If it is weapon-related, theinventor is going to try to sell it to the governmentanyway!

The Solution:The solution is simple; under the Freedom of

Information any person whose research is notsupported by government funds retains full rights tothe dissemination of scientific data unless theresearcher and the government agree on full paymentfor research achieved and/or planned. Also, thegovernment shall have no right to change theclassification of any government-funded orprivate-funded research that is not initially classified.Government employees and politicians act only uponpublic demand. Therefore, SUPPORT THE RALLYTO END SECRECY: OCTOBER 24TH, 1999 ATNOON AT THE CAPITOL BUILDING.

IS CO-GENERATION DEAD?By Hal Fox, editor

There is legislation that an entity who produces morepower than required for that entity, can sell the powerto the power company. The idea is to save theburning of more fossil fuels by having the powercompany buy the co-generated power and close downits own fossil-fuel-burning, power-generating station.The end result has been the building of a variety ofsmall water-powered generating facilities; theinstallation of natural-gas turbine-engine generators;and a number of plans for home owners to becomeinvolved in co-gen operations.

Here is the danger: The utility is not required to paymore than its lowest cost of generating electricalpower. As soon as the current two new-energytechnologies (now being commercialized) areavailable, power-production costs are expected toplummet. Therefore, anyone making an investment inpower-generating equipment to sell power to the localutility must take that information into his/her financialplanning.

Co-generation of electrical power, to sell to the localutility, is not dead but it is mighty sick. However, forthose who desire to "get off the grid" with one of thenew-energy power-generating technologies, theremay be some short-term benefits that can be obtainedby installing a larger-than-needed, power-producingunit and selling power to the local power company.Perhaps there will be a one- to two-year potential tosell power. But don't mortgage your home to do it!

NEW ENERGY NEWS BIBLIOGRAPHY

Jus t updated f rom INE, a comple tebibliography is available containing over1000 references, listing all the articles,papers and abstracts published in the NewEnergy News since we began back in 1993.Request PC WordPerfect 6.1 or ASCIIformat. Copies are US$10, postage andhandling included. INE, 3084 E 3300South, Salt Lake City, UT 84109, or call801-466-8680

NEW ENERGY NEWS 19


Lettersto the Editor & Others

LETTER FROM JOHN COLLINS

New theory on the Bessler/Orffyreus wheel

Just letting you know that I have put my money wheremy mouth is. As requested some time back, byseveral vociferous people, I've put an abbreviatedversion of the theory I've developed about JohannBessler's wheel up on my web site athttp://www.free-energy.co.uk. Why it did not violateany physical laws. I have also discovered clues to themechanism he used and I have filed a patent on it. Assoon as I know how to replicate the wheel, I'll post thatinformation too. I would welcome any feedback.

John Collins<[email protected]>Author of 'Perpetual Motion; An Ancient MysterySolved?'for more information and details on ordering, visit myweb site at http://www.free-energy.co.uk

LETTER FROM DAVID DE HILSTER

I want to thank you for your review of the SAA Book.It is greatly appreciated. As you know, trying to get anew idea out is quite a battle but we have sold over200 books world-wide in less than a year andphysicists, professors, scientists, and students alikeare starting to seriously look at Carezani's work.

Just a couple of additions and corrections...

My email is best given for this article as<[email protected]>. Also, we have anextensive website on the subject at:http://www.autodynamics.org. It has been up for over3 years now and attracts a lot of attention.

Again, thanks much for the review. It is greatlyappreciated that you took the time to read the bookand write your opinion.

Sincerely, David de HilsterSAA President

LETTER FROM TREVOR OSBORNESubject: Charging for the Internet !!

Just received the following from Ted Hall in MtRainier, WA regarding the question of whether thereis to be a long-distance phone fee charged for internetuse... Trevor

Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 23:19:45 ESTSubject: Fwd: Internet Access Fee

Thank you for e-mailing me about your concerns witha long distance charge on Internet services. There isno plan, bill, or process in place to charge an accessfee or long distance charge for the Internet. Nor isthere any plan to tax electronic commerce on theInternet, because last year Congress passed a bill,that I cosponsored, titled The Internet Tax FreedomAct. This bill puts a moratorium on all Internet taxesfor two years, until a sound policy regarding electroniccommerce can be developed. There is an e-mail thathas been circulating since this past November, and ithas always cited that a vote "will take place in twoweeks time." This e-mail is not factual. This beingsaid, where does the talk of a long distance fee on theInternet come from?

The Internet is among the most exciting technologicaladvancements in the last decade. Access to theInternet has opened up whole new possibilities for life,business, and social service. The very idea of payinglong-distance-type charges for hours web surfingnaturally produces great anxiety. Therefore theserumors tend to spring up anytime the FCC doesanything related to long distance service.

On February 25, 1999, the FCC adopted a DeclaratoryRuling to clear up some issues regarding a conflictbetween local telephone companies. Essentially theFCC is beginning to lay the ground work that will aid inthe development of the Internet.

The FCC guaranteed the following points in itsFebruary 25, 1999 meeting:

The FCC will not impose long distance charges fordialing up the Internet. This exemption from longdistance access charges is solid as a rock and hasbeen upheld in court.

The consumer may continue to access the Internetby dialing a seven digit telephone number, and will notincur a long distance charges when they do so.

20 MAY 1999


The FCC has reconfirmed the Internet's exemptionfrom local telephone charges. Consumers will see nonew charges on their Internet or phone bills

The big picture in the long run is very positive -- ourcontinued "hands off" policy towards the Internet willallow it to continue growing rapidly, unfettered byregulations.

The government must not be too quick to regulate,or worse, tax an industry that is developing itstechnology so fast. I hope this information is helpfuland answers your question.

Thanks again for contacting me about your concernswith a long distance charge on the Internet. If there isanything else I can do for you, please do not hesitateto e-mail, call or write me.

Adam SmithMember of Congress

LETTER TO DON KELLY

NEN Editor apologizes to Don Kelly and others:

Don Kelly writes: "Hal, I really do take issue with yourstatement in NEN [{put in issu and page ]] ‘In themeantime Don Kelly (and the rest of you) don't give upon mankind's ingenuity and ability to solve our energyproblems.’ This one really set me off, since I've beengong through the halls of hell in N/E for the past tenyears, and only now see the tiny (low-tech) light at theend of the tunnel. This statement is a lot like talkingdown your nose to me and the others now involved inthe low-tech 'G' Wheel N/E direction."

Don Kelly, I sincerely apologize. There is no one inthe new-energy field that has been more diligent thatyou in seeking out methods of creating better energysources. I look up to you. I admire you for your work.You will never get the credit you deserve for your time,money, and persistence. The same plaudits go toyour friends. I know you haven't given up. I suspectthat like Sparky Sweet, you'll die trying to improve theworld. I certainly do not look down my nose at anyone. It may be true that I have been discouraged bythe lack of any "low-tech" solution to the N/E problem(so far), but my hopes are with you. In the meantime,our publishing activities and our search for andreporting on both high-tech and low-tech new-energydiscoveries has brought me in contact with a couple ofamazing new developments, both of which have takenten years to develop (and neither is cold fusion). Aswe reported in NEN, March 1999, these newadvances: 1. Dr. Randall Mills collapsing the hydrogenatom below its

traditional ground state and, 2. the creation andproper control of high-density charge clusters, appearto be the two most promising new-energy technolgiesbeing, or close to being, commercialized.

Don Kelly has another beef: "Firstly, your judgementof these "G" Wheels is real bumdinger; i.e. 'a devicemay not work in a uniform gravity field, but would workif part of the device were exposed to a weakenedgravity field.'"

My fault, Don, for not being more precise. Theconcept was that if we could put one part of a wheel(almost any wheel) so that half was exposed tostandard gravity and the other half exposed toreduced gravity, then one part of the wheel (of thesame mass) would appear to be "lighter" and the otherhalf would appear to be "heavier." The wheel wouldobviously rotate. What is being done with Wheels isnot to affect gravity but to affect the torque given to awheel by having various masses change theireffective radius arm (m times r) so that this torquecaused by a uniform gravity is different on one part ofthe wheel than on the opposite side of the wheel. [Bythe way, I think the use of magnets to affect one sideof the G Wheel is ingenious.]

Don Kelly also makes another suggestion: "Shouldersactively seems to center on writing about thetechnology in his 80-plus-page patent, etc., but whynot prototype work on his proof?"

Mea culpa, Don. I've failed to report on KenShoulders' extensive laboratory work that has led tohis several patents (issued and pending). KenShoulders is, in my judgement, one of the world'sgeniuses in the laboratory. He has a marvelouslywell-equipped laboratory adjacent to his home. Onethat makes some of the rest of us drool with envy. Ihaven't properly related that story. However, Ken hasno inner need for the media to praise him, nor forothers to accept his work. He knows what he is doing.He knows what he wants to achieve, before he makesa public announcement. Ken Shoulders cares notwhat less-informed and less-talented people thinkabout his work. As for those who would like to instructShoulders about his errors, I classify theseself-appointed experts as equivalent to the ones whoproclaimed that the Wright Brothers couldn't fly,Edison's light bulb wasn't practical, and Goddardshould know that rockets couldn't work in spacebecause there was nothing to push against.

Don Kelly, thank you for calling attention to my lack ofgood reporting. You are kind enough to take time towrite and explain so that others can benefit, hopefully,by my improved explanations.Best regards, Hal Fox, Editor, NEN.

NEW ENERGY NEWS 21


This Editor’s Letter to Another Editor:

NASA TO SEARCH FOR ENERGYCourtesy Toby Grotz

Frank Walls, "Alter NASA mission to search forenergy," The Arizona Republic, 7 Dec. 1998, p B4.

Dear Editor, The Arizona Republic

In a recent contribution to "My Turn," Frank Wallssuggests that NASA be turned into NationalAlternative Energy Research Administration. One ofthe missions of the current Department of Energy is tofind, foster, and promote sources for new energy.DOE has funded hot fusion (about $20 billion) andfunded solar, wind, tide, geothermal, and biomassalternative energy products by spending billions moredollars. The results have been essentially zero, as faras providing low-cost, alternative energy. Why wouldany living and literate person expect that a renamedNASA could do any better?

Almost no scientific breakthroughs are produced fromgovernment laboratories. It is the individual or smallprivate groups that foster new technologies. Readersof The Arizona Republic may be interested to knowthat two such alternative-energy groups are nowcommercializing new-energy discoveries.

Example 1: The 1989 invention by Dr. Randell Mills isnow being commercialized (defined as a companyhaving developed its technology to the stage ofproviding engineering prototypes to licensees). Dr.Mills' invention obtains energy from catalyzing thehydrogen atom below its normal ground state. Thisprocess is accomplished in a hot gaseousenvironment and the photons of energy, in thecollapsing of the hydrogen atoms, provide copiousamounts of thermal energy. This is a revolutionarynew form of chemical energy. After this process wasdiscovered on earth, it was found to be a part of thesun's energy. For more information, see the followingweb site: www.blacklightpower.com

Example 2: Kenneth Shoulders was issued a patenton May 21, 1991 as U.S. Patent 5,018,180. Thistechnology produces both thermal energy and directelectrical energy. The ratio of the output to inputenergy ranges from 10 to 100. The source of theenergy, according to the patent: "...In any event,energy is provided to the traveling wave outputconductor, and the ultimate source of this energyappears to be the zero-point radiation of the vacuumcontinuum." This is the first patent (known to me) todescribe the source of energy as coming from theenergy that fills all space. In other words, this is thefirst technology to tap the vast energy available

anywhere on earth or in space. Now that issomething that NASA needs.

Further information of these exciting new-energytechnologies can be found in the pages of NewEnergy News, and in the Journal of New Energy.

Hal Fox, Editor, NEN & JNE

LETTER FROM STG. NIEUWE ENERGIE

Regarding Gravity, the Stevens Device, andDisk-Shaped Magnets

By means of response to the "Stevens" device thefollowing:

I wrote a theory of gravity that is based entirely on ahydraulic view of physics. This means that allphenomena are considered a result of space (aether)currents. Fields are considered mathematicalabstractions, in reality space currents exists that flowat right angles to these field-lines. For example:gravity has vertical field lines, but the real space flowis horizontal. So gravity is explained as caused byanti-clockwise, spiral-shaped space currents thatcome from all directions. Due to the presence of ourplanet, an excess exists in the horizontal direction(this out-of-balance situation obviously is the cause ofgravity).

Before making some remarks about the "Stevens"device, it must be understood that conductivity isprimarily caused by the degree the conductor allowsthe passage of space currents. This is true whether ornot electrons are involved and dragged along by thesespace currents.

When keeping the above in mind, a lot makes sensein the e-mail but a lot is non-sense as well. If the 7.23Hz is true, all smaller objects around us would shakecontinuously and we would all soon become mad.The true frequency is 157.3 kHz, the well known earthfrequency. At this frequency any coil will resonate onthe inductance of the wire and the capacitancecaused by the space in between the wires. Once thegeometry of the outer coil is fixed, cutting the wiringaway in between tests is a good way of tuning thiscoil, because the inductance changes at a differentrate than the capacitance. It is further claimed thatwhen the device is overturned it performs less well.From this may be concluded that the device is woundfrom inside out in a clockwise direction. This is thebest way to receive the pulsating anti-clockwisegravity spiral currents. By the way, nothing is saidabout this spiral aspect and

22 MAY 1999


I consider this just as important as the flatness of thecoil. Because of the excess of horizontal spiral gravityflow, the device will perform best when in thehorizontal position. When placed at an angle, it willreceive spiral flows that have suffered absorption bythe near planet. I would not be surprised when theantenna shows much operation when in the verticalposition. Because the gravity spiral flows come fromthe outside, the outer coil shields the inner coil fromthe gravity energy; this means the only task left is atransformer function. Because a rectifier bridge givesa loss of 1.2 Volts, it is very efficient to step up thevoltage to decrease this loss. This also brings downthe impractical high frequency to a zero value. Thisinner coil must be tuned to the same base frequency.A lot of readers wonder about the function of themagnet(s). Magnets show a powerful space currentaround the north-south axis, when a conductor isplaced around this axis this will promote spaceconduction. This would promote the start-up of thedevice. Of course, a 157.3 kHz trigger current woulddo the same job. You have all heard of Coler's 180kHz fundamental frequency for magnets. This was forthe 10 mm. diameter steel magnets of his time. It'spossible however to find a magnet that is tuned to theantenna. The frequency of a disc shaped magnet isproportional to its strength and inversely proportionalto it's diameter.

Stg. Nieuwe EnergieHalleyweg 1893318 CG DordrechtHolland

LETTER FROM FRANK ZNIDARSIC

I originally published the idea of a quantum ofcapacitance in my book Elementary Antigravity in1989, ISBN: 0-533-08334-6.

This idea is important in that it links the size of themacro-un iverse to the in terac t ions o fmicro-elementary particles. The link is stray capacitivecouplings.

The value I published in 1989 is 3.42 x 10 -24 farads.

Let's take a look at the capacitance of an isolated oneinch superconducting sphere.

Capacitance = 4 eo = 1 x 10 -10 farads

The ratio of the quantum of capacity to capacity ofsphere is 3.42 x 10 -24 / 1 x 10 -10 = 3.4 x 10 -14

----------------------------------------------------

We have just discovered that the velocity of light in asuperconductive solid is 35 MPH or about 75 metersper second

The ratio of this number to the speed of light squaredis (must square number because light speed varies ofthe sq. root of the electric constant):

(75 / c)2 = 6.25 x 10 -14

Note the agreement between the above two ratios.

------------------------------------------------------

Finally we believe that the downshifted Comptonwavelength of the electron in a one inch super-conducting disk is:

FREQ MHz = 38 / (diameter) = 38 mega hertz

This value is constant with Noever's work at NASAMarshall

This yields a wavelength of c/FREQ = 7.9 meters

Comparing 7.9 meters to the Compton wavelength ofthe electron yields: (note this frequency varies directlywith the change in capacitance)

2.42 x 10 -12 / 79 = 3.1 x 10 -14

Once again this third ratio is consistent with the firsttwo.

The numbers may be off a little due to the fact that theexact size, modes of vibration, and stray capacitancevalues are not exactly known.

CONCLUSION

A superconductor is a view into another universewhere: Light travels at 31 MPHCompton frequencies are in Mega Hertz band.Low Level Nuclear Reactions take place.Heat travels at the speed of sound.Current travels without friction.

I wonder what life would look like in such a universe.

The conclusions support my original idea of aquantum of capacitance.

Comments please.Frank [email protected]

NEW ENERGY NEWS 23


MeetingsTHE NATIONAL TOWN MEETINGFOR A SUSTAINABLE AMERICA

Detroit, Michigan and points across AmericaMay 2-5, 1999

http://www.sustainableamerica.org

Sponsored by the President's Council on SustainableDevelopment (PCSD) and the Global Environment &Technology Foundation (GETF), the National TownMeeting (NTM) will showcase best practices thatpromote sustainability around the country. Theprogram will emphasize building individual andinstitutional capacity so that best practices can bereplicated elsewhere. The NTM will focus onsustainable solutions that are available today andways that you can take advantage of them.

The NTM may to be the largest U.S. event of its kind,with activities in Detroit and many communities acrossthe country. They expect to reach millions ofAmericans with extensive national and local mediacoverage. The NTM program features a variety oflearning and networking opportunities that highlightthe vital issues that must be addressed to create asustainable America. The event will launch a"sustainability best practices" movement, providetraining tools to replicate these practices and trackand measure the impacts of new approaches.

Included will be roundtable discussions, interactivelearning sessions, an award ceremony and culturalactivities planning. Over 3,000 people are expectedin Detroit, with thousands more participating inConcurrent Events through satellite links and theInternet. The audience in Detroit will include leadersin business, communities, government, academia andmany others who are seeking practical informationabout how sustainable practices can benefit theircommunities or businesses. A marketplace forexhibitors from business, academia, government andnon-government organizations will also be featured.

34th IECECIntersociety Energy Conversion

Engineering ConferenceAugust 1-5, 1999

Hotel VancouverVancouver, British Columbia, Canada

"Engineering an International Energy Strategy"

This conference provides a forum to present anddiscuss engineering aspects of energy conversion,advanced energy conversion systems and devices,energy utilization and efficiency, environmentalissues, and policy impacts on the research,development and implementation of energy systems.Papers dealing with all engineering aspects of thegeneral topical areas below are welcome.

General Chair: Dr. Jerry BeamAir Force Research LaboratoryPh: 937/255-6226Fax: 937/476-4781Email: [email protected]

Program Chair: Michael G. SchneiderSundstrand CorporationPh: 815/394-4952Fax: 815/394-3897Email: [email protected]

INSTITUTE OFNUCLEAR MATERIALS MANAGEMENT40th Annual Meeting, July 25-29, 1999The Pointe Hilton at Squaw PeakPhoenix, Arizona

The 40th Annual Meeting will provide attendees withprofessional forum for the exchange of the latesttechnical information in nuclear materialsmanagement. The meeting will address all aspects ofnuclear materials management.

Can be reached at INMM Headquarters at (847) 480-9573; Fax (847) 480-9282

7th RUSSIAN CONFERENCE ON COLD NUCLEARTRANSMUTATION (RCCNT-7)May 23-30, 1999Olimpiyskiy Hotel, Dagomys(near the famous Black Sea resort town of Sochi)

Programming includes:1. Experimental researches of Cold Fusion andNuclear Transmutation;2. Cold Fusion and Nuclear Transmutation theoreticalmodels;3. Cold Fusion applied technologies and devices.

24 MAY 1999


Registration fee: $900 covers conf. Proceedings andprogram, transportation to and from Sochi airport,hotel, all meals, organizing fee.

Contact Yury N. Bazhutov, P.O. Box 169, “Erzion”Center, 105077 Moscow, Russia.Phone (095) 464-78-81, (095) 946-15-51Fax (095) 131-89-65<[email protected]>

4TH ASTI WORKSHOP ON ANOMALIES INHYDROGEN / DEUTERIUM LOADED METALS

22-24 October 1999, Hotel Villa Riccardi, Via al Monte7, Rocca d'Arazzo(AT)

E-mail: [email protected] site: netcity.it\coldfusion

The entire hotel is already pre-booked for the nightsof 21,22, 23 so we will make any reservation on yourbehalf. Accommodation will cost attendees just45,000 lire per night (about $25).

This year there will be a workshop fee of 250,000Italian lire as a contribution towards meals which willbe provided by the organization. All participants willreceived a copy of the Proceedings of the 3rdworkshop published by the Italian Physics Society(Societa' Italiana di Fisica). Notwithstanding theintroduction of the workshop fee, the cost of attendingthe workshop may even be lower than in previousyears because of the lower board and accommodationcosts.

If you would like to present a paper, book a room, orsimply attend the workshop, please contact me assoon as possible because space is limited.Check out the website for the latest details.

Yours sincerelyBill Collis (Local Organizer)

EXOTIC RESEARCH CONFERENCE POSTPONED

New Location & Dates: Phoenix/Mesa, Arizona, July22-July 25, 1999http://www.exoticresearch.comConference Location: Holiday Inn, 1600 SouthCountry Club Drive, Mesa, AZ 85210Hotel Reservations: (602) 964-7000, rooms $59.

The Exotic Research Conference scheduled in Seattlefor March 25-March 28, 1999 has been

changed to Phoenix/Mesa, Arizona. July 22-July 25,1999. Those who are previously preregistered will becontacted individually to make arrangements forrefunds or transference of registration to the PhoenixConference. If you would like to contact me, I can bereached at (520) 424-3581.

As a consolation to those living in the Seattle area,Paul Pantone has agreed as a personal favor to go toSeattle and put on a FREE GEET technologyworkshop at the Doubletree Inn at Southcenter onSunday March 28, 1999. Paul will be in the area fromFriday March 26 - Sunday March 28. For exact datesand times call Paul Pantone at (801) 281-2462.

Conference Rates$249.95 - Members/Nonmembers$199.95 - Spouse$169.95 - Student (under 21)Price does not include workshops or banquet.

Workshop Rates - $39.95

Pre-Registration Discount Rates25% - members registered before Apr 3020% - members registered before May 3115% - members registered before Jun 3010% - members registered before Jul 22

Annual Membership Rates$30-United States$35-Canada/Mexico$55-ElsewhereDiscount does not apply to memberships.

Engine that runs on mountain dew!! Impossiblewelds with BROWN'S GAS! STIRLING ENGINESat work! Free energy from air! SuppressedElectromedicine! Movement restored inquadraplegics!

REGISTER ONLINE or call (24 hours/day):(800) 417-6399(520) 424-3581 (Steve Elswick)

If there is any one thing that attendees can do to makethings easier on the staff, it is to PREREGISTER!!!!Preregistration is important. It allows the planners todetermine numbers for room arrangements, cateringarrangements, etc. Preregistration also insures thatyou will have a place to sit in the conference.Unfortunately many people believe they can wait untilthey get to the door to get in and then they get allupset at the fact that space is limited. It is theconference organizers nightmare.

NEW ENERGY NEWS 25


Commercial ColumnCommercial Column

ENECO : is in the business of commercializing theexciting new field of low energy induced nuclearreactions in solids via patent licensing, joint-ventures, and co-operative research. ENECO,University of Utah Research Park, 391-B ChipetaWay, Salt Lake City, Utah 84108 USA. ContactFred Jaeger, Voice 801-583-2000, Fax 801-583-6245. Email: [email protected]

Fusion Information Center (FIC): Research anddevelopment of new energy systems. The world'smost complete resource depository for cold fusionresearch information, as well as other new energyresearch including zero-point energy; space energyresearch; electronic, electromagnetic, andmechanical over unity devices and transmutation.We are the publishers for New Energy News, andthe Journal of New Energy. Voice 801-466-8680,Fax 801-466-8668. Contact Hal Fox.

Please help pass the word. Thank you for yoursupport,

Steve ElswickPublisher, Exotic Research Reporthttp://www.exoticresearch.com

ADVANCED POLYMER SOURCES SEMINAR

International Seminar on the Technology ofInherentlyConductive PolymersSeptember 26-29, 1999Sheridan Conference Center, Toronto, Canada

A tutorial on the various aspects of thetechnology will be given on the first day of thisseminar (Sunday the 26th). This includesproperties, processing and applications. Mondaythrough Wednesday will be dedicated toone-hour lectures given by scientists fromindustry and academia involved in thedevelopment and marketing of this technology.The workshop will end in a round tablediscussion.

The seminar is designed for engineers andscientists involved in the R&D as well as designof a variety of electrical and electronic app catons and devices incorporating semiconductingand high conductivity polymers.

Contact: Dr. Matt AldissiTelephone: 813-854-4332 Fax: 813-854-5596email: <[email protected]>web page:<www.fastwww.com/conductive_polymers/>

The following companies (listed alphabetically)are commercializing cold fusion or otherenhanced energy devices: [Listings with youradditional copy, or boxed, for small annual servicefee.]

COMPANY: PRODUCT

American Pure Fusion Engineering and Supply:Warren Cooley, 1-800-789-7109 or 503-585-6746.Email to: [email protected]

Clustron Sciences Corp.: Contact: Ron Brightsen,703-845-8531.

E-Quest Sciences: Contact Russ George,FAX 415-851-8489.

German Association for Vacuum Field Energy: DVS-Secretariat, Feyermuehler Str. 12, D-53894Merchernich, Germany. Tel: 011-49/(0)2443-8246 Fax:011-49/(0) 2443-901880 E-mail: [email protected]: www.gptec.com/dvs.

Holotec AG: Clean Energy Technology, contact AndréWaser, Gen. Mgr., Bireggstrasse 14, CH-6003, Luzern,

26 MAY 1999


Trenergy, Inc., is developing new technology tostabilize high-level radioactive wastes.Contact at 3084 East 3300 South, Salt Lake City,UT 84109, Voice801-466-8680, Fax 801-466-8668.

Institute for New Energy (INE), organization topromote and help find funding for new energyresearch.Visit our Home Page: www.padrak.com/ine/ whichcontains many important scientific papers andcurrent reports on all areas of research.E-mail: [email protected]

or [email protected] Lake City, Utah. Voice 801-466-8680,Fax 801-466-8668.

New Energy News monthly newsletter forINE, highlighting the research anddevelopment in the worldwide new energyarena. Edited by Hal Fox.

Switzerland. Phone 011 41-41 360 4485, or Fax 01141-41 360 4486.

Hydro Dynamics, Inc.: Rome, Georgia. Contact JamesGriggs, Voice 706-234-4111 Fax 706-234-0702.

JET Energy Technology, Inc.: Energy Production andUtilization and Control. Weston, MA. Contact Dr.Mitchell Swartz, Voice 617-237-3625. Fax 617-237-3625.http://world.std.com/~mica/jet.html

Labofex, Experimental and Applied Plasma Physics:Ontario, Canada. Contact Dr. Paulo N. Correa. Tel905-660-1040Fax 905-738-8427

Magnetic Power Inc.: Sebastopol, CA. Contact MarkGoldes, voice 707-829-9391, Fax 707-829-1002.

Nova Resources Group, Inc.: Denver, CO. Call ChipRansford, Phone 303-433-5582.

UV Enhanced Ultrasound : Hong Kong.FAX 852-2338-3057.

"YUSMAR"- Scientific-Commercial Company:President: Dr. Yuri S. Potapov, 277012 Kishinev,Moldova. Phone and Fax 011-3732-233318.

Zenergy Corp.: Founded in 1996 to facilitate theintroduction of commercially viable energy alternatives.390 South Robins Way, Chandler, AZ 85225. ContactReed Huish, 602-814-7865, Fax 602-821-0967, e-mail:[email protected]

Note: The Fusion Information Center has been actingas an information source to many of these companies.We expect to augment our international service toprovide contacts, information, and businessopportunities to companies considering an entry into theenhanced energy market.

INFORMATION SOURCES

Advanced Energy Network Newsletter, quarterly.Advanced Energy Network, P.O. Box 691, Rondebosch7700 Capetown, Rep. South Africa.

Antigravity News and Space Drive Technology ,bimonthly newsletter, pub. J.E.Cox Enterprise, P.O. Box

655, Marietta, GA 30061-655 (Phone 770-218-9693).Per year $36. U.S., $48 foreign.

Cold Fusion Times, quarterly newsletter published byDr. Mitchell Swartz, P.O. Box 81135, Wellesley Hills MA02181.Home Page: http://world.std.com/~mica/cft.html

Cycles, a R&D newsletter, published by DieterSoegemeier, Editor, GPO Box 269, Brisbane,QLD.4001, Australia.Phone/Fax: +61 (0)7 3809 3257.

Electric Spacecraft Journal, quarterly, edited by CharlesA. Yost, 73 Sunlight Drive, Leicester, NC 28748.

Electrifying Times, 3/year magazine. 63600 DeschutesMarket Rd, Bend, OR 97701541-388-1908, Fax 541-388-2750,E-mail <[email protected]>www.teleport.com/~etimes/

Elemental Energy, monthly newsletter, edited by WayneGreen, 70 Route 202N, Petersborough, NH 03458.Email: <[email protected]>

Foundations of Science, free newsletter pub. 4-6/yr., ed.David L. Bergman. Common Sense Science, Inc., P.O.Box 1013, Kennesaw, GA 30144-8013. 770-565-5504

< D b e r g m a n @ C o m p u S e r v e . c o m >www.cormedia.com/css

Fusion Facts has become a section in the Journal ofNew Energy.

Fusion Technology, Journal of the American NuclearSociety, edited by Dr. George Miley, 555 N. KensingtonAve., La Grange Park, IL 60525.

Future Technology Intelligence Report (FTIR), monthlynewsletter, making available technological informationnow omitted from establishment media. Back issuesavailable at substantially lower cost on the InterNet at<www.tarapublishing.com> FTIR, P.O. Box 2903,Sacramento, CA 95812. <[email protected]>

NEW ENERGY NEWS 27


Journal of New Energy, quarterly, presentingpapers representing the new areas of energyresearch, leading-edge ideas in the developmentof new energy technology, and the theories behindthem. Published by the Fusion Information Center,Inc. Editor: Hal Fox. Address & phone above.

Infinite Energy, bi-monthly magazine.P.O. Box 2816, Concord, NH 03302-2816.Voice: 603-228-4516. Fax: 603-224-5975E-mail [email protected]

A.Keith Brewer International Science Library, a non-profit organization having a Tesla collection; new energybooks, publications and videos; one of the GermanAssociation of Vacuum Field Energy archives. 325 N.Central Ave., Richland Center, WI 53581; Phone:608-647-6513; FAX: 608-647-6797; e-mai l :drbrewer@mwt/net; web site: www.mwt.net/~drbrewer.

KeelyNet BBS - Jerry Decker, 214-324-3501Internet: www.keelynet.comE-mail: [email protected]

Planetary Association for Clean Energy Newsletter,quarterly, edited by Dr. Andrew Michrowski. 100Bronson Ave, # 1001, Ottawa, Ontario K1R 6G8,Canada. Web page: http://energie.keng.de/~pace

Positive News and Living Lightly, quarterly, edited by S.Crockett-Burrows. The Six Bells, Bishops Castle,Shropshire SY9 5AA UK. Tel: (01588) 630-121 / 122

Space Energy Journal, quarterly, edited by Jim Kettner& Don Kelly, P.O. Box 1136, Clearwater, FL 34617-1136.

The above list of commercial and information sourceswill be growing. New listings will be added asinformation is received. Send information to NEN , 3084East 3300 South, Salt Lake City, UT, 84109.

Advertising rates for New Energy News

1 Month 2 Months 6 Months 12 issues1/8 page $ 25.00 $ 40.00 $100.00 $175.001/6 page $ 35.00 $ 50.00 $140.00 $245.001/4 page $ 45.00 $ 60.00 $180.00 $315.001/3 page $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $200.00 $430.001/2 page $100.00 $140.00 $400.00 $700.00Full Page $150.00 $200.00 $550.00 $900.00

CONTENTS FOR MAY 1999SUPPRESSED INVENTIONS . . . . . . . . . . . 1EVEN FREUD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2FUSION BRIEFINGS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

Two thoughts on the tempestRAD-WASTE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

New Nuclear Waste PlanTransmutation

MISCELLANEOUS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4Millennial ScienceLight May Slow DownThompson ScatteringTapping ZPE?The Oil GlutMoney Changing

ARTICLES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7Dynamics of NeutrinosNucleovoltaic CellKnowledge Knows No Borders

Parameters of the UniverseDefining the Energy MarketEnergy Creation ResearchMore Anomalies

OTHER PUBLICATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13Wired for Cold FusionCosmic LightFTIRGlobal Energy OutlookSpace Energy Journal

BOOK REVIEW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15Freedom in ChainsKeeping America Uninformed

EDITORIAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18Is Co-Generation Dead?

LETTERS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19MEETINGS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23COMMERCIAL COLUMN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25

suppressed inventions - a book report by hal fox

Documents