Superintendent’s Advisory Committee Process and Recommendation January 11, 2018

Committee Members Community Members Eric Ortega – Pala Tom Flanagan – Rancho Eric Nordeen – Gird Kassandra Costa – Sullivan Jeff Johnson – Bonsall ES Brian Olson – Bonsall West Margarette Morgan – Chair Bonsall Community Sponsor

Group Staff Members • Julie Urquhart – BTA President • Lee Fleming – BHS Principal • William Pickering – Assistant Superintendent Business

Services

Committee Process

Committee discussion and feedback related to the current reality of facilities, growth in student population, and the immediate need for facilities planning and building a high school.

Committee Process

Committee Process

Reviewed importance of Prop 51 state funding.

$1.13 billion remains of $3.0 billion for new construction.

Estimated funds available for projects turned in over next 20 months.

With matching funds, BUSD could secure estimated $9,000,000.

Committee Process

• Committee discussion and feedback related to the current reality of properties available. • Of 6 selected for further review, none are currently on the market for sale. • Board directive to ask realtor to conduct final search for available properties. • Committee discussion and feedback related to a bond election needed to pay for building a new school.

Site Analysis Strategy Scope • 8 Potential sites

6 sites presented by Patrick Miller on Wednesday 11/15. Gird Ocean Breeze

Methodology 1. Narrow scope

8 original sites narrowed to 5 through initial weighted ranking of committee.

2. Utilize California Department of Education (CDE) site analysis tools and process

3. Utilize extensive publically available APN data for each site (Margarette Morgan) https://gis-public.co.san-diego.ca.us/ISRP/home (Initial Study Research Packet)

4. Use both statistical evaluation methods and qualitative input from committee.

5. Present factual findings.

Property Search Parameters: • Not more than ¼ mile from arterial

or collection road. • Sewer service proximity. • Location of ingress and egress points. • Topography • 25 – 60 acre sites • No flood plain or flood way locations

CDE Tools and Process William Pickering provided the committee 3 CDE forms

Site Analysis - Is / Is Not

IS IS NOT

• An overall ranking of potential sites. • A professional school site evaluation.

• A recommendation of 2 sites. • A recommendation on what type/grade level of school to build on any given site.

• The result of a diverse committee with representatives from the community, who have reached consensus with the presented findings.

• Proposal on different options the board may have to buy, swap, exchange, sell, etc. land.

• A financial analysis on the various site alternatives.

Site Analysis Results

Jan-2018 Candidate SitesPart 3 ADJUSTED

Site

4 M

issi

on R

d

Site

5 O

ld R

iver

Rd

Site

6 H

olly

Ln

Site

7 O

cean

Bre

eze

Site

8 G

ird R

d

Red = lower 50%Yellow = 51 to 80%

Green = top 20%

Rating FactorsPossible Points 73 78 77 75 91

Safety 20 19 19 18 18 20Location 15 12 13 11 11 13Environment 10 8 9 7 8 10Soils 10 7 8 9 9 9Topography 10 3 5 9 7 10Size and Shape 10 8 10 5 8 9Accessibility 10 8 7 9 6 9Public Services 3 3 2 3 2 2Utilities 3 3 3 3 3 3Cost 3 1 1 2 2 3Availability 3 1 1 0 2 3Public Acceptance 3 1 2 2 2 2

Gird is the highest scoring site. Site 5 – Old River Road is 2nd highest scoring site.

Conclusion After reviewing the 6 properties presented by realtor, Patrick Miller (in addition to Ocean Breeze and Gird Road properties), the BUSD Superintendent’s Advisory Committee determined that there were multiple sites to consider within the Bonsall Unified School District. Gird Road was determined to be the preferred site. “Property 5”, off of Old River Road, was the second preferred site.