summary report - ron smith and associates, inc. · comparison proficiency test page test #17301...
TRANSCRIPT
Headquarters Laboratory P.O. Box 670
Collinsville, MS 39325 Office (601) 626-1100
Fax (601) 626-1122
Florida Laboratory 201 Douglas Ave, Suite A
Dunedin, FL 34698
Office (727) 253-4991
Fax (727) 953-7849
Ron Smith & Associates, Inc.
Testing Division
Toll Free: 1-866-832-6772 │ www.RonSmithandAssociates.com
Email: [email protected]
Spring 2017 Footwear
Comparison Proficiency Test
Test #17301
Summary Report
Page 1 of 13
Summary Report Spring 2017 Footwear Comparison Proficiency Test #17301
Issued: May 24, 2017
On February 20, 2017, Ron Smith and Associates, Inc. (RS&A) shipped the 2017 Spring Footwear Comparison Proficiency Test #17301. Participants were required to submit their responses no later than April 24, 2017 in order for them to be included in this summary report. A total of 22 tests were ordered and shipped, with all 22 participants returning their responses. The test was provided in both digital and hard copy format and included seven questioned impressions and four known footwear impressions. The results presented in this report reflect whether or not the participants’ submitted results agree or disagree with the assigned values garnered from pre-distribution testing and outlined in The Manufacturer’s Report (Appendix 1). The primary purpose of a Summary Report is to provide an overall documentation of all the submitted responses. It is RS&A’s intention to go a step further by providing more meaningful statistical results through analyzing the submitted responses in relation to the demographics obtained from each of the examiners participating in this proficiency test. All results and statistics for Test #17301 will be outlined through graphs and charts found in the remainder of this report. Prior to distribution of this test, all of the expected responses were determined to be either “Identification” or “Exclusion”; however, we are aware that some agencies allow for a conclusion of “Inconclusive” in their casework. In designing this Proficiency Test, there was no intention to force a participant to render a conclusion which goes beyond their considered opinion. To satisfy this option, participants were allowed to enter “Inconclusive” as a response. Due to the fact that a participant's “Inconclusive” response does not meet the assigned values, it will appear as an inconsistent response in the summary report and be incorporated as such in the statistical analysis. It will be up to each agency to decide if the participant's “Inconclusive” response qualifies as being acceptable under their policies and procedures. RS&A strives to maintain the confidentiality of all of its clients and participants. All results are obtained and published using randomly generated test codes. RS&A will not release the identity of any participant without the written consent of the participant and/or the agency involved. For any additional information, please contact Footwear Proficiency Testing Coordinator, at [email protected] or call toll free at 1-866-832-6772.
Spring 2017 Footwear
Comparison Proficiency Test
Test #17301
Summary Report
Page 2 of 13
Appendix 1
Test Manufacturer’s Information
Spring 2017 Footwear Comparison Proficiency Test #17301
The assigned values are:
Questioned Impressions Q#
Conclusion Known Shoe
K-#
Q-1 Identification K-4, Left Shoe
Q-2 Identification K-3, Right Shoe
Q-3 Exclusion
Q-4 Exclusion
Q-5 Exclusion
Q-6 Identification K-2, Left Shoe
Q-7 Identification K-2, Left Shoe
The test consisted of seven questioned impressions and four known footwear impressions in hard copy photograph and/or digital image formats. The assigned values were determined through the ground truth information and verified through unanimous agreement during pre-distribution testing.
Spring 2017 Footwear
Comparison Proficiency Test
Test #17301
Summary Report
Page 3 of 13
Appendix 2
Appendix 3
*For further information, please read Manufacturer’s Additional Observations on the final page of this report.
99%
Consistent vs Inconsistent Responses Compared to Assigned Values
Consistent (153)
Inconsistent (1)
118
35
1 00
20
40
60
80
100
120
Accredited (17) Non-Accredited (5)
Consistent vs Inconsistent ResponsesBased on Accreditation
Consistent
Inconsistent
1%
Spring 2017 Footwear
Comparison Proficiency Test
Test #17301
Summary Report
Page 4 of 13
Appendix 4
Appendix 5
*For further information, please read Manufacturer’s Additional Observations on the final page of this report.
0
153
0 10
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
Sworn (0) Civilian (22)
Consistent vs Inconsistent ResponsesBased on Sworn or Civilian Status
Consistent
Inconsistent
84
69
0 10
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
IAI Certified (12) Non-Certified (10)
Consistent vs Inconsistent ResponsesBased on IAI Certification Status
Consistent
Inconsistent
Spring 2017 Footwear
Comparison Proficiency Test
Test #17301
Summary Report
Page 5 of 13
Appendix 6
*For further information, please read Manufacturer’s Additional Observations on the final page of this report.
55%
4%
14%
27%
Percentage of Participants Based on Primary Job Position
Latent Print Examiner (12)
Firearms/Toolmark Examiner (0)
Crime Scene Investigator (1)
Footwear Examiner (3)
Questioned Document Examiner (0)
Other (6)
42
0
20
7
0
84
0
0
1
0
0
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Other (6)
Questioned Document Examiner (0)
Footwear Examiner (3)
Crime Scene Investigator (1)
Firearms/Toolmark Examiner (0)
Latent Print Examiner (12)
Consistent vs Inconsistent Responses Based on Primary Job Position
Consistent
Inconsistent
Spring 2017 Footwear
Comparison Proficiency Test
Test #17301
Summary Report
Page 6 of 13
Appendix 7
*For further information, please read Manufacturer’s Additional Observations on the final page of this report.
68%
23%
9%
Percentage of Participants Based on Time Devoted to Footwear Casework
Less than 25% (15) 25%-50% (5)
51%-75% (0) 76%-100% (2)
14
0
35
104
0
0
0
1
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
75%-100% (2)
50%-75% (0)
25%-50% (5)
Less than 25% (15)
Consistent vs Inconsistent Responses Based on Time Devoted to Footwear Casework
Consistent
Inconsistent
Spring 2017 Footwear
Comparison Proficiency Test
Test #17301
Summary Report
Page 7 of 13
Appendix 8
*For further information, please read Manufacturer’s Additional Observations on the final page of this report.
4%
50%
9%
14%
23%
Percentage of Participants Based on Hours of Footwear Training Completed
Less than 40 Hours (0) 40-80 Hours (1)
81-200 Hours (11) 210-400 Hours (2)
401-1000 Hours (3) 1001+ Hours (5)
35
21
14
76
7
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
1001+ Hours (5)
401-1000 Hours (3)
210-400 Hours (2)
81-200 Hours (11)
40-80 Hours (1)
Less than 40 Hours (0)
Consistent vs Inconsistent Responses Based on Hours of Footwear Training Completed
Consistent
Inconsistent
Spring 2017 Footwear
Comparison Proficiency Test
Test #17301
Summary Report
Page 8 of 13
Appendix 9
*For further information, please read Manufacturer’s Additional Observations on the final page of this report.
9%4%
27%
55%
5%
Percentage of Participants Based on Years of Experience in Footwear
Examinations
Less than 1 Year (0) 1-3 Years (2)
4-6 Years (1) 7-10 Years (6)
11-20 Years (12) 21+ Years (1)
7
83
42
7
14
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
21+ Years (1)
11-20 Years (12)
7-10 Years (6)
4-6 Years (1)
1-3 Years (2)
Less than 1 Year (0)
Consistent vs Inconsistent Responses Based on Years of Experience in Footwear
Examinations
Consistent
Inconsistent
Spring 2017 Footwear
Comparison Proficiency Test
Test #17301
Summary Report
Page 9 of 13
Appendix 10
*For further information, please read Manufacturer’s Additional Observations on the final page of this report.
18%
5%
36%
41%
Percentage of Participants Based on Highest Level of Education Completed
High School (4) Associate's Degree (1)
Bachelor's Degree (8) Master's Degree (9)
PhD (0)
0
63
56
7
27
0
0
0
0
1
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
PhD (0)
Master's Degree (9)
Bachelor's Degree (8)
Associate's Degree (1)
High School (4)
Consistent vs Inconsistent Responses Based on Highest Level of Education Completed
Consistent
Inconsistent
Spring 2017 Footwear
Comparison Proficiency Test
Test #17301
Summary Report
Page 10 of 13
Appendix 11
*For further information, please read Manufacturer’s Additional Observations on the final page of this report.
111
1
42
00
20
40
60
80
100
120
Consistent Inconsistent
Consistent vs Inconsistent ResponsesBased on Review of Original Conclusions by
another Footwear Examiner Prior to Submission
Reviewed (16)
Not Reviewed (6)
Spring 2017 Footwear
Comparison Proficiency Test
Test #17301
Summary Report
Page 11 of 13
Appendix 12
Participant Responses Listed by Test Code
Questioned Impression # Q-1 Q-2 Q-3 Q-4 Q-5 Q-6 Q-7
Assigned Values
ID K-4
ID K-3
EXC EXC EXC ID
K-2 ID
K-2
Test
C
od
e
4301C17301 ID
K-4 ID
K-3 EXC EXC EXC
ID K-2
ID K-2
8154W17301
ID K-4
ID K-3
EXC EXC EXC ID
K-2 ID
K-2
3866A17301
ID K-4
ID K-3
EXC EXC EXC ID
K-2 ID
K-2
8906H17301
ID K-4
ID K-3
EXC EXC EXC ID
K-2 ID
K-2
5121M17301
ID K-4
ID K-3
EXC EXC EXC ID
K-2 ID
K-2
7142J17301
ID K-4
ID K-3
EXC EXC EXC ID
K-2 ID
K-2
4714Q17301
ID K-4
ID K-3
EXC EXC EXC ID
K-2 ID
K-2
4129V17301
ID K-4
ID K-3
EXC EXC EXC ID
K-2 ID
K-2
3602E17301
ID K-4
ID K-3
EXC EXC EXC ID
K-2 ID
K-2
8997N17301
ID K-4
ID K-3
EXC EXC EXC ID
K-2 ID
K-2
3523J17301
ID K-4
ID K-3
EXC EXC EXC ID
K-2 ID
K-2
Spring 2017 Footwear
Comparison Proficiency Test
Test #17301
Summary Report
Page 12 of 13
1149D17301
ID K-4
ID K-3
EXC EXC EXC ID
K-2 ID
K-2
1035Q17301
ID K-4
ID K-3
EXC EXC EXC ID
K-2 ID
K-2
3164M17301
ID K-4
ID K-3
EXC EXC EXC ID
K-2 ID
K-2
154J17301
ID K-4
ID K-3
EXC EXC EXC ID
K-2 ID
K-2
1102I17301
ID K-4
ID K-3
EXC EXC INC ID
K-2 ID
K-2
6718A17301
ID K-4
ID K-3
EXC EXC EXC ID
K-2 ID
K-2
88G17301
ID K-4
ID K-3
EXC EXC EXC ID
K-2 ID
K-2
4166E17301
ID K-4
ID K-3
EXC EXC EXC ID
K-2 ID
K-2
7824F17301
ID K-4
ID K-3
EXC EXC EXC ID
K-2 ID
K-2
6499M17301
ID K-4
ID K-3
EXC EXC EXC ID
K-2 ID
K-2
6277Y17301
ID K-4
ID K-3
EXC EXC EXC ID
K-2 ID
K-2
Spring 2017 Footwear
Comparison Proficiency Test
Test #17301
Summary Report
Page 13 of 13
Totals
Questioned Impression # Q-1 Q-2 Q-3 Q-4 Q-5 Q-6 Q-7
Assigned Values
ID K-4
ID K-3
EXC EXC EXC ID
K-2 ID
K-2
Consistent Responses 154 154 154 154 153 154 154
Inconsistent Responses 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
Percentage of Consistent Reponses
100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 100% 100%
Participant’s Additional Comments
Test Code Comments
4301C17301
Used Q-6 and Q-7 in comparison of Q-5 to K-2.
8906H17301
Q2 - Q5 were excluded due to excessive wear. The identifications were effected due to correspondence in outsole pattern and physical size as well as correspondent general wear and individualizing accidental characteristics.
1102I17301
Q5 - scene mark has movement in it, some features not recorded. Mark could have been left by K4 but with no footwear elimination prints from victims (bearing in mind there are 2 exclusions with the same sole pattern) I would have to say 'inconclusive'.
Manufacturer’s Additional Observations There were no additional observations.
Authorized by: Ron Smith, President For Further Information Contact: Footwear Proficiency Test Coordinator